CIVIL LAW CASES [Vol.

XXXII 20I0:
350

dated 22-4-2006 that required him to deposit rent on 10th May. It was in (b)S
the same order dated 22-4-2008 that the learned Rent Controller had
-—‘5.
ordered to deposit of arrears and then payment of monthly rent by 10 of
each month. Since the tenant deposited rent on 10th of May, the things to esti
speak for itself; at least on 10th of May he knew of the tentative rent
order The case-law referred to by the learned counsel does not really
(c)Q
help him because in Zubaida’s case the tenant pleaded that he did not -—Art
know of the rent order. But here the tenant compiled with one part of the unclin>
rent order and did not comply with the other part of the same order. The
other three cases relied upon by the petitioner are the cases where there
was a technical default either rent deposited in the wrong case but in the
same Court or by mistake in another case or m Jamil Ahmad s case
consistent conduct over six years. No such element is present m this
case The strict view taken by the Supreme Court m Muhai^ad
Yousaf’s case is law of the land. Even otherwise the petitioner has fai ed
against
to make out any ground for interference with concurrent orders by the
Additior
Court below. This Constitution Petition is therefore, dismissed in limme
dated
with listed application. Rajanpm
Petition dismissed. dismisset
S.A.K./M-200/K
. 2. :
possessio
2010 C L C 350 Bakhsh v
Bakhsh s<
[Lahore]
and that .
Before Ch. Naeem Masood, J expired aj
property,
MANZOOR AHMAD and 9 others—Petitioners residence
versus made pers
was Contes
GHULAM NABI and 5 others—Respondents 31-7-2003
and the ca
Civil Revision No.l55-D of 2007, decided on 9th April, 2009.
additional j
(a) Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984) (i) Wh
__ Art. 129(g)—Best evidence must be produced and should not be is t;

withheld, [p, 353] A (ii) Wh

NS Vehkatagiri Ayyangar’s case PLD 1949 PC 26 and Abdul 3- ^
Ghafoor v. Kallu 2008 SGMR 452 ref. with the
Sardar v Gurdial AIR 1927 PC 230; Bajranglal v; Sheeta Ram the partie
the suit i]
ATR 1Q49 Cal 457- Ramchand v. India AIR 1962 Bombay 92; Virendra
15-6-200(
V Jagiivan AIR 1974 SC 1957; Bhagwan v. Bhishan AIR 1974 p“nJa ’
Mst. Kamina v. Al-Amin 1992 SCMR 1715 and Iswar v. Harihar AIR learned A
dated 9-2-
199 SC-1341 rel.
CLC