Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Villa I Tatti, The Harvard Center for Italian Renaissance Studies and The University of Chicago
Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to I Tatti Studies in
the Italian Renaissance
PATRICIA SIMONS
The muchmuch
visualattention
attentionlately, evident
culture in atofleast
lately, four major
marriage exhibitions
evident in in Renaissance at least four Italy major has exhibitions attracted
mounted over the years 2008-10.1 When, in the summer of
2010, 1 visited the Museo Thyssen-Bornemisza in Madrid to see the ex-
hibition devoted to Domenico Ghirlandaio's portrait of Lorenzo Tor-
nabuoni's wife Giovanna degli Albizzi (Fig. 1), I realized that my dis-
sertation completed decades ago still had a story to tell. Continuing
errors in the identification of certain Tornabuoni portraits are informed
by ahistorical or romanticizing assumptions that occasionally imbue
current scholarship on marital imagery.2 By taking a forensic approach
to the portraits of Lorenzo Tornabuoni and his successive wives, I hope
1 This essay has benefited from comments graciously offered by Caroline Elam, Jonathan
Nelson, and the anonymous readers. I am also indebted to Rab Hatfield, whose generosity with
documents long ago enriched my own archival explorations. Elizabeth Mellyn kindly checked
the updating of archival seganture. All archival references are to the Archivio di Stato, Florence.
All dates cited are new style.
In chronological order, the exhibitions were The Triumph of Marriage: Vainted Cassoni of
the Renaissance , Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum, Boston (Baskins et al. 2008); Art and Love
in Renaissance Italy , New York, The Metropolitan Museum of Art (Bayer 2008); Love and
Marriage in Renaissance Florence: The Courtauld Wedding Chests , London, Courtauld Gallery
(Campbell 2009); and Virtù d'amore : Pittura nuziale nel quattrocento fiorentino , Florence, Gal-
leria dell'Accademia e Museo Home (Paolini, Parenti and Sebregondi 2010). Marriage was
also a central but not exclusive theme in the ground-breaking exhibition on domestic arts, At
Home in Renaissance Italy, London, Victoria and Albert Museum (Ajmar-Wollheim and Den-
nis 2006). For a review of the 2008 exhibitions at the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum and
The Metropolitan Museum of Art, see Simons and Schmitter 2009.
2 VAN DER Sman 2010a (references will be to the English translation at the end of the
book). Earlier bibliography on Ghirlandaio's panel portrait includes Cadogan 2000, 174-
176, 277-278, no. 46; Brown 2001, 190-193, no. 30. This article draws on Simons 1985,
esp. 2:143-145, 169-175, 305-306, 311-313. Due to a misunderstanding about copyright,
UMI long withheld the dissertation but it is now available through Proquest and alternatively
can be accessed and downloaded without charge at http://deepblue. lib. umich. edu/handle/
2027. 42/78007.
103
not only to resolve specific confusions but also to suggest how to elu-
cidate the genre of marital portraiture, especially of women, with an
historically informed, broad analysis.3
The current tendency to situate what seems to be nearly every secu-
lar work of art within the context of marriage should be modulated, as
should assumptions about appropriate, "private," or purely personal
imagery. For example, it was a life-long bachelor, the Venetian patri-
arch Gabriel Vendramin, who commissioned, in about 1545, Titian's
lively depiction of Cupid conquering a formerly ferocious lion to func-
tion as the cover for the portrait of a woman (who was probably not a
mistress).4 Two paintings of circa 1425 showing the race and presenta-
tion of banners during the feast day of Florence's patron saint John the
Baptist are profoundly civic scenes decorating marriage chests. s As
with other rites of passage, certain (though far from all) marriages oc-
casioned public spectacles and domestic decoration in an elite culture
that required magnificent display in both palaces and piazzas. For mar-
ital or other reasons, Renaissance portraiture placed personages on ex-
hibit for audiences that went beyond the familiar and familial to the
communal and foreign. Lorenzo's gilded room housing Giovanna's
portrait, admired even by a usually sanguine notary as "bella," would
have impressed visiting Florentines as well as numerous foreign digni-
taries who were accommodated in the Tornabuoni palace.6 Medals of
various Tornabuoni men and women, including the newly wed Giovan-
na, were objects that circulated outside the boundaries of family and
city.
Such visual, expensive statements were expected to last forever,
eternally presenting figures in prayer and pious witness in the case of
religious portraiture and preserving ancestors for the sake of future
generations. Ghirlandaio's consummate profile (Fig. 1) commemorated
Giovanna's death in 1488, two years after she married Lorenzo Torna-
buoni. Ghirlandaio also frescoed at least one, and I contend two, por-
traits of her within the family chapel in Florence (Figs. 2, 11), and these
shed further light on her status. I will also demonstrate that Lorenzo's
104
105
131. The old notion that the rightmost woman among the visitors in the Birth of the Baptist is
Giovanni's sister Lucrezia Tornabuoni has recently been mistakenly reversed, and it has thus
been said that Lucrezia (aged fifty-six when she died in 1482) is the young woman on the
far left, "in her most expensive finery, staring out at the viewer": Campbell and Cole 2012,
291.
106
one his age."15 Educated in part with his cousins, the children of Lo-
renzo de' Medici, and a student of Greek under Angelo Poliziano,
was in the top echelon of Florentine cultural and political circles. Gio
vanni's sole legitimate son, Lorenzo, was probably keen to continue th
lineage, and he married at the age of eighteen, very early for a Floren
tine man, producing a son with his first wife Giovanna. Upon her un
timely death while pregnant again, he established a chapel in her hon
at the church of Santa Maria Maddalena, often called Cestello, where
rebuilding campaign under Medicean aegis was under way.16 His se
ond wife, Ginevra Gianfigliazzi, whom he married in 1491, bore h
a son and two daughters, but during the 1490s he was also engage
in financial and political troubles resulting from the faltering fortune
of the Medici after Lorenzo il Magnifico's death in April 1492 an
the expulsion of the son Piero in November 1494. 17 One of five men
charged with treason in August 1497, he was unceremoniously b
headed by the anti-Medicean Republic in the middle of the night.1
For more than forty years thereafter, the Tornabuoni estate was tied
up in complex legal maneuvers: confiscated by the state, on the on
hand, but on the other hand part of the inheritance of Lorenzo's youn
children, whose property was officially administered by the magistrac
of the Pupilli (wards).19 Cannily, to forestall the possibility of financi
ruin, Giovanni had ceded much of his property to his two grandsons
legally bypassing Lorenzo, though that strategy only helped delay wha
was eventually the dispersal of the estate, including the sale of the vil
with Botticelli's frescoes in 1541 and the palace in 1542. 20
At the time of the portraits under consideration here, however, th
Tornabuoni were wealthy landowners. Just as they gathered in an ar
rich with familial associations within the city, the Tornabuoni's large
15 Guicciardini 1970, 134. Other contemporary praise includes Cerretani 1994, 217
237, 239; Nardi 1888, 107. On Lorenzo's patronage, see Simons 1985, 1:136-138, includ
Giovanni Banchegli's, Aritmetica (where he is called "magnifico"), and passim for his edu
tion; van der Sman 2010b, 12-157, passim.
16 Luchs 1977, esp. 21, 42-45, 86-88, 116, 119, n. 3, 149, n. 50, 283-286, 348, 349. Bette
known by the name Santa Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi due to a later change in dedication, t
church will hereafter be referred to as Cestello.
17 Guicciardini 1970, 134; van der Sman 2010b, 130-157.
18 Landucci 1883, 155-157; Parenti 1994-2005, 2:121-124; Simons 1985, 2:113-114
n. 166; van der Sman 2010b, 149-156.
19 Van der Sman 2010b, 159-160.
20 Simons 1985, 2:113, n. 165; Kuehn 2009, 1:63-82; van der Sman 2010b, 144, 160
107
21 Simons 1985, 1:169-175, and passim-, Simons 1987, 221-250; Cadogan 2000, 238. On
patronage rights in the chapel, see also Hatfield 1996.
22 Simons 1985, 1:170-171, 173-174. For the villa at Chiasso Macerelli, see also Carocci
1906-07, 2:224-225; Pedroli Bertoni and Prestipino Moscateli 1988 (for plans of the rele-
vant suite see 217, 231, 235).
23 Horne 1908, 142-143, gives a clear, detailed account.
24 Vasari 1906, 3:269; Gombrich 1945, 57, n. 1, repeated in Gombrich 1972, 218,
n. 163. The doubt was echoed in Chastel 1959, 172, n. 3.
25 Ettlinger 1976, 404. Doubt continues to be expressed, for example, by Pons 1989,
72; Pegazzano 2000, 2:1627; and Zöllner 2005, 225, 226. Giovanna is mistakenly seen in the
villa's portrait, and the building is said to have been owned by her uncle-in-law rather than her
father-in-law by J. G. Pollard in Scher 1994, 134, no. 46. Lorenzo's uncle is again the erro-
neous owner in Pollard 2007, 342-343. Citing yet adapting Simons 1985, 1:298-317, Pollard
sees Ginevra in the villa fresco but invents the idea that it is an "overpainted figure."
*> Pupilli 181, fol. 144r; Simons 1985, 1:171; Cadogan 2000, 287, no. 68.
27 Lightbown 1978, 2: 62, citing Carocci 1906-07 and Conti 1881 and 1882.
108
28 "Un podere posto nel piviere e popolo di Santto Stefano in Pane, luogho detto Chiasso
Maceregli, chon chasa da singnore e da lavoratore, il quale nel primo chatasto del 1427 era di
Giuliano... [sic: di Francesco] Ginori e dipoi si trasferi per Dominicho suo figluolo da Piero [di
Filippo] da Ghaglano... e dipoi dopo la morite di detto Piero la sua donna e rede e prochura-
tore si IT à venduta a Giovannj Tornabuoni sopradetto": Catasto 922, fol. 15 Ir; Simons 1985,
1:170, 2:135-136; VAN der Smán 2007, 180, nn. 7-8. Giuliano di Francesco Ginori's return of
1427 confirms this provenance (Catasto 78, fol. 164r), as does that of Filippo da Gagliano in
1469-70 (Catasto 925, fol. 370v). Rtoolfi 1890, 442, n. 1, dated the transfer from Ginori to da
Gagliano at 1451.
29 "Uno podere posto nel popolo e piviere di Sant Stefano in Pane, luogho detto Chiasso
a Mascierelli, con chasa da signiore e lavoratori confinato da prima via e secondo Lorenzo de'
Medici e 3. Tomaso Lottieri, e più tre pezzi di terra con suo vochaboli e confini apresso a detto
podere e sopra dettj confini tiello a mezzo Ciancho di Maso e Giannino e Piero suo figliuolo":
Monte Comune o delle Graticole, Copie del Catasto dell'Archivio del Monte, 1427-1480 (he-
reafter Copia di Catasto) 73, fol. 430r, published in part by Horné 1908, 142, 353.
30 Pedroli Bertoni and Prestipino Moscateli 1988, Fig. 99 (misdated). For the device,
see note 68 below.
31 NA 5675, fol. 49v, published in Cadogan 2000, 371. For the "chamera della lodovi-
cha" and its anticamera , see Pupilli 181, fol. 143 r.
32 The legal donation of his estate to his grandsons in January 1495 (NA 1924, insert 1,
fols. 281r-87v) and his tax return submitted that year, Decima Repubblicana 25, fol. 605r.
33 Pupilli 181, fols. 141r-44r; CS, Ser. II, 124, fol. 76v ("El Chiasso cho' 3 poderi"). Gio-
vanni's funeral was on 17 April, his onoranza on 19 April: Corporazioni Religiose Soppressi dal
Governo Francese (hereafter Soppressi) 102, App. 19, fol. 124r and App. 86, fol. 53r. For fi-
nancial reasons, Giovanni's great grandson Lionetto was forced to sell "una possessione nomi-
nata El Chiasso" in 1541: Carocci 1906-07, 1:225; Pampaloni 1968, 362, n. 68.
109
and construction occurring at the site during the 1480s and 1490s, the
room frescoed by Botticelli is surely the "chamera nuova di sopra" ex-
amined in the inventory begun on 4 January 1498.34 The only other
room specifically placed on the upper floor was the bedroom or "cha-
mera di Lorenzo di sopra," which adjoined this "new" room by way of
an anticamera , and that arrangement is still evident today. Botticelli's
frescoes embellished the room closest to the main stairs, and hence it
was the more appropriate, semi-public area for entertainment and re-
laxation.
Perhaps the new set of rooms, typical of nuptial suites, was built in
time for the arrival of Lorenzo's first spouse Giovanna di Maso degli
Albizzi (1468-1488) in the autumn of 1486, which is the occasion
usually associated with Botticelli's frescoes. More likely, however, it
was ready for his second wife Ginevra di Bongianni Gianfigliazzi
(1473-1542 or later), wed in 1491. 35 Lorenzo's earlier wedding in
1486 was instead the occasion for the decoration of a sumptuous suite
in the family's city palace.36 The evidence reconfirms the traditional yet
sometimes questioned association of the frescoes with Lorenzo Torna-
buoni and his wife, but it does not prove a connection with Giovanna
or provide a certain date.37
Dissention has also arisen because it is, amazingly, often not recog-
nized that the woman portrayed by Botticelli (Fig. 3) is not identical
with Giovanna as portrayed by Ghirlandaio in Santa Maria Novella
and in the Madrid panel (Figs. 1-2). 38 The strange claim for resem-
blance between the female face in the villa and Giovanna's two por-
traits continues to be made, for instance, by Josef Schmid in 2002
34 See Pupilli 181, fols. 143v-44r for the rooms and their decoration. I thank Patricia Ru-
bin, with whom I visited the Tornabuoni villa in June 1987. Some scholars date the inventory to
25 September 1497, but that is when the file was opened and the children listed; the actual
inventory took place several months later.
35 Ammirato 1615, 42, dated the Tornabuoni- Albizzi wedding to 15 June 1486, hence
long repeated. But celebrations took place in September and some of the dowry was paid in
October 1486: VAN DER Sman 2007, 162-163, 181, nn. 19-20 (payments by her father in July
through September); Cecchi 2008, 280, n. 115 (the dowry). For Ginevra's marriage, see below.
36 Pupilli 181, fol. 148r; Kress 2003, 245-285; Bayer 2008, 303-306, no. 140.
37 Cf. van der Sman 2007, 162; van der Sman 2009, 57-58; van der Sman 2010b, 48.
38 Citing no literature on Ghirlandaio, Körner 2006, 248, 396, n. 5 63 regards Botticelli's
female figure as Giovanna, dismissing as implausible the observation in Pope-Hennessy 1966,
217, that the villa woman follows Giovanna in the chapel but remains unidentified. Some Bot-
ticelli scholars note the difference, but go no further than saying he did not portray Giovanna,
or they accept Ettlingens undocumented claim (1976).
110
and Gert Jan van der Sman several times between 2007 and 2010. 39 In
stead, the woman in the villa, with strikingly individualized features,
clearly the younger of the two women who immediately follow Giovan
na in Ghirlandaio's Visitation (Fig. 2). It is implausible to believe th
Giovanna is a recognizable portrait in the fresco, but that the distinc
tive face behind her is only a generic idealization.
In 1897 it occurred to Ulrich Thieme that the woman portrayed b
Botticelli was, in fact, Lorenzo's second wife, but he rejected the notio
because of the presumed marriage of Ginevra in 1494, a date consi
ered too late on stylistic grounds.40 However, we now know that she
was considered marriageable in mid- 1489, had consummated her mar
riage with Lorenzo by October 1491, and bore a son in Septembe
1492. 41 Later scholars have rarely taken up the case for Ginevra, bu
evidence published here for the first time in full strongly points
her representation at the villa.42
The mistaken identification goes back to the time of the sale of Bot
ticelli's frescoes. In 1881-82, Cosimo Conti and then Charles Ephru
proposed that Botticelli portrayed Giovanna in a fresco commemorat
ing her marriage in 1486, citing Scipione Ammirato's sixteenth-centur
description of the spectacular wedding festivities that has long prede
termined the focus on the union as an exceptional one.43 While t
111
mirato's description is presumably drawn from Naldo N aldi' s epithalamium, discussed in VAN
der Sman 2007, 174-179; van der Sman 2009, 39, 44-51, 60-61, 87; van der Sman 2010a, 269,
292-293; van der Sman 2010b, 31-32, 35, 37, 41-42, 51, 60, 66.
44 Perosa 1960, 28-34.
45 Sitwell 1889, 9 (acknowledging the difference but still seeing Giovanna in the me-
dal, the panel, and the frescoes of both the chapel and the villa); Ridolfi 1890, 439-452 (cit-
ing the same material as Sitwell but not noting a difference); Paléologue 1897, 493-497 (not
noting a difference); Thieme 1897-98, 192-200, observing a difference, as did Mesnil 1938,
100-102.
46 Horne 1908, 144, 147-148. About the same time, Gerald S. Davies (1908, 118) ex-
plicitly saw Giovanna as the leading lady in the Visitation but was puzzled by the discrepancy
with the face in the villa.
47 Gombrich 1972, 75-76.
48 Ettlinger 1976, 404-406; briefly reported in Ettlinger and Ettlinger 1976, DO-
DI; accepted by, among others, Pons 1989, 72-73; Martin 1996, 119 and caption to Fig. 2;
Acidini Luchinat 2001, 17; Zöllner 2005, 120-124, 225-226. The label was observed in
the Louvre on 23 August 2010.
112
113
8
54 "2 bacini d'ottone con più lavoro chon issmalto e con l'arme di chase Albizzi e Gian-
figliazzi": Pupilli 181, fol. 14 lv. Giovanni's anteroom in the town palace contained "una mi-
sciroba chon l'arme di chasa e dagli Albizi": fol. 149v; for Albizzi arms on a Tornabuoni em-
broidery, see NA 5675, fols. 47v-48r, published in Cadogan 2000, 370.
ss HORNÉ 1908, 147.
56 Horné 1908, 145-147.
57 Lightbown 1978, 1:93-97, 2:60-63. The leading woman in the Visitation was first
identified as Giovanna by SlTWELL (1989) then Ridolfi (1890). Lightbown did not suggest
who she was if not Giovanna.
114
58 The embroidered palio was to include the coat of arms of Giovanni's dead wife Fran
cesca Pitti, too: NA 5675, fols. 47v-48r, published in Cadogan 2000, 370. Luchs 1977, 1
n. 16 quotes the Grascia record of Giovanna's death. Her funeral and "messa cantata" at San
Maria Novella used a generous 52 lbs of wax: Soppressi 102, App. 84, fol. 40r. Her son's bir
is recorded in Tratte 444 bis, fol. 162r.
59 On the masses, see Simons 1985, 1:139-143, 2:116-18, nn. 183, 191-197.
60 NA 5675, fol. 48v; Cadogan 2000, 370. Giovanni was indeed buried in the chape
Simons 1985, 1:214-215.
61 Simons 1985, 1:143, 2:118, nn. 195-197. From Christmas 1490 or 1491 masses for he
were offered in the Cestello chapel instead.
62 Cadogan 2000, 236; Landucci 1883, 60. For the order of painting, see the diagram
of giornate in Ruffa 1990, 58, Figs. 6-7; Cadogan 2000, 241.
63 Sedano Espín et al. 2010, 331-338.
64 Sedano Espín et al. 2010, 333-334, who are surprisingly cautious about the order o
execution between panel and fresco, though the authors rightly stress the changes and say th
the ultimate source was very probably her medal.
115
65 Pope-Hennessy 1966, 28 and oft repeated, for example in Brown 2001, 190; Luke
Syson in Campbell et al. 2008, 151; van der Sman 2010a, 270, 279, 289.
66 For the giornata see Ruffa 1990, 58, Fig. 6.
67 Similarly, the Man of Sorrows painted by Ghirlandaio in the 1480s has Christ's right hand
reaching forward yet partly truncated by a fictive border of red paint: van der Sman 2010a, 327,
no. 55. Another purpose of the brown border in Giovanna's portrait may have been to prevent
cropping by the framer: Sedano Espín et al 2010, 337. A brown border also surrounds Ghirlan-
daio's Magi tondo for the Tornabuoni and Michelangelo's Torment of St Anthony, c. 1487-88.
68 First pointed out in Simons 1985, 1:145, then Simons 1988, 13. Among other loca-
tions, the triangular or diamond emblem (usually with flames) occurs at the Cestello chapel;
throughout the frescoed borders, glass, and intarsia at Santa Maria Novella; on corbels in
the vüla and capitals in the city palace; and on one version of Giovanni's medal (Hill 1930,
no. 1023). According to the surviving drawing, it was also planned for Zacharias's vestment
and the dome in the Annunciation to Zacharias , though the details are now barely discernible
in the fresco. For the drawing, see Cadogan 2000, 131, 305-306, no. 112. On the device, see
Simons 1985, 1:145, 229, 259, 2:212-213, n. 94; De Prano 2010, 16-17.
69 For various versions of the medal see Hill 1930, nos. 1021-1022; Pollard 1984, 452-
456, nos. 253-254; Eleonora Luciano in Brown 2001, 130-132, no. 11; Syson in Campbell et
al. 2008, 148-151, no. 33; van der Sman 2010a, 288-289, 298-299, nos. 19, 29.
116
70 The adaptation is probably by Lorenzo's teacher Poliziano: Simons 1985, 1:143, 2:118,
n. 199; Shearman 1992, 108-112. Poliziano also wrote an epigram for her tomb: Polizian
1867, 154-155; Maïer 1965, 194, n. 2, 244, 292. Although most of the evidence points to Po-
liziano, Lorenzo Tornabuoni may have played a role in adapting the inscription: De Pran
2008b, 617-641.
71 Pupilli 181, fol. 148r.
72 Hatfield 2009, 21-22, earlier reported by Musacchio 2008, 29-32.
73 Lauts 1943, 53, no. 58; Anrep-Bjurling 1980, 281, 290; Schmid 2002, 111. If this is
true, then Hatfield's idea that Ghirlandaio portrayed in-laws holding handkerchiefs or gloves
repeated by Musacchio (note 72), is unlikely. On the cloth (mappa) signifying status or purifi
cation (at various rites, including nuptials), see Partridge and Starn 1980, 55-56, 61-62.
117
74 Lee 1882, 163, 164; Mesnil 1938, 103; dismissed already by Conti 1882, 60. Pico's
medal reverse of the Graces and his hairstyle seem to have given rise to this suggestion, along
with an urge to associate Botticelli's paintings with Neoplatonism and the Medici circle.
75 TfflEME 1897-98, 192-200. Lauts 1943, 53, no. 74, suggested that the woman in the
villa and the chapel is Antonio's wife, and hence this is repeated in Anrep-Bjurling 1980
284-285. Antonio may be portrayed in the Sistine chapel (note 80 below).
7* Ross 1910, 218, 224-225; Simons 1985, 1:130-131, 145, 2:108-109, nn. 135-137.
77 NA 5675, fol. 49v, published in Cadogan 2000, 371.
7* Gombrich 1972, 75-76.
79 Lorenzo's medal, Hill 1930, no. 1068, would seem to be ca. 1485, judging by his
young age (he was born on 10 August 1468: Tratte, Libro dell'Età 443 bis, fol. 146r); on
the medal see also Campbell et al. 2008, 148-151, no. 34; van der Sman 2010a, 298, no
28. Similarly, his sister Lodovica appears much younger in her medal than she is at the head
of the entourage in the Birth of the Virgin by Ghirlandaio: Hill 1930, no. 1069; Luciano in
Brown 2001, 127-129, no. 10; van der Sman 2010a, 286-287, no. 17. One version of Lodo-
vica's medal contains the inscription AN. Villi and, since she was born on 1 Oct. 1476 (Monte
Comune o della Graticola 3744, fol. 281r), it was cast in 1485-86.
118
119
her demise. A future wife rather meekly stands in her shadow, and in
each case valuable oligarchic alliances are publicly displayed by the
portrayal of in-laws.85
While it can be hazardous to compare two faces by different artists,
the very close similarity - in viewing angle, facial features, hair, shaved
forehead, scalp, jewelry, and veil - between the two versions of Ginevra
indicates that one depends upon the other. Despite surface losses in
each fresco, the hair styling and individual wisps of curling hair ar
more detailed in the chapel, as are the bags under her eyes and slight
differences between the eyelids. Appropriately somber when following
her dead predecessor in the chapel, the new bride has a fresher, livelier,
more idealized, and self-possessed mien when painted by Botticelli in
the villa. As with Ghirlandaio's portrait of Giovanna in the Visitation ,
it is probable that Botticelli, too, resorted to a previously produced
drawing or painting as the model for Ginevra's face.
Since the Visitation was painted in 1490, Botticelli's work in the vil-
la is of about the same year or a litde later. According to the Dominican
chronicler Modesto Biliotti, writing in 1586, Botticelli designed em-
broidery that Giovanni Tornabuoni donated to the cappella maggior
of Santa Maria Novella as part of his campaign to make it his family
and funereal chapel.86 Giovanni's will drawn up in March 1490 noted
that the work on an embroidered cover for the crucifix had begun
which locates Botticelli's relationship with the family precisely about
the time of Lorenzo's second marriage.87
Other evidence also points to the later date for Botticelli's frescoes.
Lorenzo collected part of the Gianfigliazzi dowry on 13 October 1491,
but Ginevra was considered nubile from mid- 1489, not long after her
sixteenth birthday, when her dowry matured in July of that year. The
85 Far from a unique political move to ally the Albizzi with Medici relatives (still claimed
by Schmid 2002, 127, for instance), the marriage of Giovanna and Lorenzo was only one of
several marital alliances between the Tornabuoni, Medici, and Albizzi. For example, Giovanna
was the granddaughter of Lorenzo's aunt: Simons 1985, 1:123, 144, 2:103, n. 97, 119, n. 203,
hence Cadogan 2000, 278.
86 Biliotti 1895-96, 241. Without noting the patron, in 1568 Vasari named Botticelli as
the designer of the "fregio della croce che portano a processione i Frati di Santa Maria Novel
la": Vasari 1906, 3:323.
87 NA 5675, fol. 47v, published in Cadogan 2000, 370. The sewing nuns of Santa Ver-
diana were paid for the work in June 1495, suggesting that indeed the work was only starting in
1490 and that thus the design had been made recendy. For the payment see Soppressi 102,
Appendice, 19, fol. llOv (new numeration lOlOv).
120
88 NA 1924, insert 1, fol. 147r; and note 41 for Ginevra's dowry fund.
89 Van der Sman 2009, 189, n. 9; van der Sman 2010b, 176, n. 63.
90 I am grateful to Brenda Preyer for this information, drawn from Bongianni' s rico
danze , which she uses in Preyer 2004.
91 Borsook and Offerhaus 1981, 38-40; Hatfield 1978, 2:230-231.
92 On the basis of the now lost document of 1561, Alessandro's presence in the group
the left of the Expulsion was first indicated by Follini 1795, 323. The dowry is documented i
Monte Comune o della Graticola 3744, fol. 28 Ir and Alessandro was "marito" by 27 Augu
1492; NA 13888 (formerly M237), fols. 124r-26r (Feb. 1493); Hatfield 2009, 34, nn. 14
145. The marriage was arranged by Lorenzo de' Medici on 25 February 1489: Hatfie
2009, 22, 35, n. 147. Nasi witnessed the extension of Ghirlandaio's deadline for the complet
of the chapel's frescoes in April 1489: NA 4359 (formerly C186), insert 5, no. 8.
121
122
from the common medium of fresco and the presence in both of youn
graceful women clothed in plentiful, loose drapes than it does fro
such matters as color, composition, or figure groupings (Fig. 4). T
mistaken identification of the female portrait has predetermined asses
ments of Botticelli's visual strategy.
The four personifications greeting Ginevra may "look like sisters of
the daughters of Jethro" painted in Rome, yet they are simpler, large
relatives, conceived with more breadth and monumentality." Deta
are less evident, their decorative place overtaken by the manipulation
of color, which was becoming "more individual than before [Rome
and more varied."100 Botticelli's increasing simplification of mass and
detail during the late 1480s is especially evident in his treatment
form and composition within the Liberal Arts fresco (Fig. 5). Figures
are bent into geometric generalizations, subdued by forces workin
more toward a sense of group dynamics. The sloping shoulders an
elongated sweep of Philosophy seated on a raised dais and Geomet
to her immediate right, for instance, are close to that bravura manipu
lation of human form Botticelli imposes on the Virgin in the Cestello
Annunciation , commissioned after March 1489, or on the female fig
ures in his Santa Barnaba altarpiece, commonly dated to abou
1488. 101 Perhaps Botticelli's "virile air" [aria virile), singled out by a
anonymous Milanese contemporary at about this time, was precise
evoked by the vigor of his colors and increasingly broad conception.10
The identification of Lorenzo and his second wife Ginevra in the
villa has implications for the meaning of Tornabuoni portraiture. Th
deceptive appearance of individual detail in portraits (albeit misrecog
nized!) has exacerbated a widespread tendency to read portrayals
Giovanna in personal, romanticized terms. Hence, for instance, a boo
about her two-year marriage is subtitled, in Dutch, "beauty and de
tiny" ( schoonheid en noodlot ), changed in the recent English translati
to the similarly nostalgic phrase "timeless art and fleeting lives." 103 O
123
104 Zöllner 1998, 101, 112, reiterated as a possibility in Zöllner 2005, 226.
105 Van der Sman 2009, 189, n. 9; van der Sman 2010b, 176, n. 63, instead offers the
circular argument that the nuptial themes of Naldo Naldi's poem for the Tornabuoni- Albizz
marriage of 1486 apply so well to Botticelli's frescoes that the images cannot relate to any othe
wedding.
1{* Hill 1930, nos. 998B, 1003; Wind 1967, 36-56, 68-80, Figs. 10-14, 69-70. For a re-
freshingly non-Neoplatonic reading of the reverses with Mercury and Three Graces, see De
Prano 2010, 18-22, and with a plausible emphasis on bridal virtues, De Prano 2008a.
107 Cf. Syson in Campbell et al. 2008, 148, reporting an opinion that goes back to Hill
1930, no. 1021. The Graces on Giovanna's reverse are less worn than those on the other medals
Hill reproduces.
108 Cf. Syson in Campbell et al. 2008, 151, n. 1.
109 "In Albieram Albitiam," lines 27-28, in Poliziano 1867, 239. Botticelli's Three
Graces in the Primavera are another case, probably marital, and unrelated to Tornabuoni pa-
tronage.
110 Poliziano 1867, 240, lines 33-36. The figure on the medal also recalls Poliziano's de-
scription of chaste Diana in his Stanze 1. 46.
124
H' Fahy 1984, 1:233, Figs. 233-234; Campbell 2007; Bayer 2008, 303-306, no. 140; van
der Sman 2010a, 294-296, nos. 24-26.
112 For Mercury in the villa, see Zöllner 1998, 110.
113 Poliziano 1867, 72, 154-155, 333-335; SIMONS 1985, 1:176-77, 2:141-142; FAHY
1984, 233; note 70 above. Poliziano is among the humanists portrayed by Ghirlandaio in
the Annunciation to Zacharias.
114 For the poetic fiction of female portraiture, see Dempsey 1992, esp. 131-139.
115 Dal Poggetto 1977, including 337-341 for pearls; Randolph 1998, 182-200.
125
not necessarily a particular woman. In the Birth of the Virgin, the re-
cently affianced but still virginal Lodovica Tornabuoni probably wears
what her father's testament of 1490 described among her lavish dowry
as a "crocettina."116 In her earlier medal, Lodovica displayed what may
be the bulky, round "crocettina" of pearls surrounding a crucifix, but
from it three pearls are suspended (Fig. 10).
At about the same time, the medal of her new sister-in-law Giovan-
na exhibited jewelry that was her signature ornament before it passed
on to the second wife Ginevra for display on public occasions, even
while it was actually part of Lodovica's dowry. The usual form of the
pendant, seen in the profile panel (Fig. 1), consists of a tripartite com-
position: a small diamond is set in gold at the top, below that is a large
ruby in a quatrefoil gold setting, and from it hang three large pearls.
Giovanni's testamentary list of his daughter's dowry succinctly de-
scribed it in 1490 as "a pendant with one ruby and one diamond
and three pearls."117 But in the medals, young Lodovica wears the
three pearls, while the bride Giovanna has a single, elongated gem or
pearl hanging below the first two elements. Although the parts were
somewhat interchangeable in visual representations and the small dia-
mond setting at the top was not always depicted, and the pendant
hangs from either a string of pearls or a plain black cord in various por-
traits, the elements are similar enough for the basic form to be recog-
nizable. It first appears in about 1485-86 in the medals, and in 1489-90
both Giovanna and Ginevra display it in their adjacent portraits within
the Visitation , and hence it had featured in Giovanna's profile panel
(1488-89) and later recurred in Ginevra's villa fresco (1490-91), before
it is carefully described in Giovanni's will of 1490 and then in further
documentation of Lodovica's dowry in 1493. 118 Initially, the pendant in
Giovanna's panel portrait (Fig. 1) was rather different, indicating that
at some point during production it was decided that she would be per-
petually endowed with the Tornabuoni asset.119
116 For the Tornabuoni jewelry, see NA 5675, fol. 49r, published in Cadogan 2000, 370-
371; Simons 1985, 1:135, 2:112, n. 163; Hatfield 2009, 33-34, n. 140. On the "crocettina," see
also Dal Poggetto 1977, 295, 340, nos. 187, 219 (where Lodovica's name and death date are
incorrect); Simons 1985, 1:139; Simons 1988, 9.
117 NA 5675, fol. 49r, published in Cadogan 2000, 370.
118 For Nasi's acknowledgment of Lodovica's dowry in February 1493, see Hatfield
2009, 34, n. 140.
119 Susana Pérez, "Radiographic Study," in van der Sman 2010a, 335.
126
120 Staley 1909, xiv; Offerhaus 1976, 119-120 (and hence Schmid 2002, 130); Dal
Poggetto 1977, 296, no. 189 (but "Giovanna Tornabuoni" is also seen in the Birth of the Vir-
gin , 340). The following is drawn from Simons 1985, 1:311-314, 2:240-242, nn. 140-143 (hence
Hatfield 1996, 115, 117, n. 58). Despite the fact that a copy of Simons 1985 was hand deliv-
ered to him in winter 2005, van der Sman (in 2009, 196, n. 9, and 2010b, 183, n. 116) names
Offerhaus, Schmid, and Hatfield, but not Simons, when saying the identification is hypotheti-
cal.
121 For the drawing, see Cadogan 2000, 300, no. 98 (British Museum 1895, 0915. 451).
122 For various changes, all dating after November 1487, see Simons 1985, 1:312, 317;
Simons 1987, 233, 235 and n. 39. Ghirlandaio's Magi tondo dated 1487 very probably also
celebrates the birth: Simons 1985, 2:139, n. 81.
127
is probable that the Birth was executed not only after the boy's birth in
October 1487 but also after the necessary seasonal break during win-
ter's cold and damp.
That the Birth was painted in the summer (of 1488) is suggested by
the fact that the fruits being delivered with enthusiasm by a classicizing
maiden on the far right - grapes, pomegranates, and probably peaches
- ripen in that season or early autumn, especially overlapping in Sep-
tember. Moreover, the female figure wears over her white dress a sum-
mer garment, a giornea or open-sided overgown, of light pink with
golden embroidery. Ghirlandaio may have painted the fruits and cloth-
ing at another time, perhaps the spring, but he chose to visualize the
celebration of a birth as though it were taking place in late summer
or early autumn, somewhat befitting Giovanni di Lorenzo's birthday
of 1 1 October. The visual congruence of seasonal details also conveys
the impression of eyewitness immediacy. The female figure's pose and
tired, puffy appearance imply that she is gravid, as Giovanna certainly
was when she died on 7 October 1488, according to Poliziano's com-
memorative epigram.123 Mother and pregnant again when depicted
alive but ill in the Birth, Giovanna later featured as a dead, commemo-
rated, and idealized wife in the Visitation below.124
Portrait identifications by way of visual comparison are difficult, be-
cause artistic license and variation are always involved. Botticelli clearly
idealized his figures but so, too, did Ghirlandaio, often considered the
paragon of realistic portrayal in Quattrocento Florence. The generaliza-
tion of features was exacerbated by the working process, which re-
quired at least one transfer from memory or a drawing rather than di-
rect observation. Ghirlandaio's ability to evoke a grander vision from
the particulars of a drawing is famously evident in the case of the el-
123 Poliziano 1867, 154-155, which notably grieves over a child "nondum nata," but
many modern writers erroneously say that she died in childbirth.
124 The delay between the painting of the two registers is explained by the backlog of
work implied when, on 7 April 1489, the Ghirlandaio brothers obtained an extension of their
deadline from May 1490 to March 1491: Cadogan 2000, 359-360, no. 33, which also notes
that most of the chapel's frescoes were done in 1488-90 (241). The large double-sided altar-
piece, the stained glass designs, and changes to the program of the frescoes had been added
to their workload since the initial contract, along with such Tornabuoni commissions as the
Magi tondo (1487) and Giovanna's profile portrait panel (1488-89). Perhaps the altarpiece
of the Visitation for Cestello (1491) had already been commissioned by the time of the exten-
sion, too. For at least eight works connecting the Tornabuoni with Ghirlandaio, see Simons
1987, 236. The summer of fresco production in 1489 was perhaps primarily focused on the
lowest register of Mary's cycle.
128
Fig. 10. Domenico Ghirlandaio, detail of leading woman (here identified as Giovanna degli
Albizzi), in The Birth of St. John the Baptist , ca. 1488, fresco. Cappella Maggiore, Santa Maria
Novella, Florence.
Fig. 11. Niccolo Fiorentino (attributed), Lodovica Tornahuoni , obverse, ca. 1485, late cast,
bronze, 15 mm diameter. Samuel H. Kress Collection, National Gallery of Art, Washington
DC, 1957.14.891.a.
derly man with a diseased nose, for whom both the graphic record
and the final painting survive.125 In the case of one surviving portrait
in the Tornabuoni chapel, for an older female attendant in the Birth o
the Virgin, Ghirlandaio moved from a now-lost sketch (perhaps in
metalpoint) to the finished (and surviving) drawing in black chalk,
which was then pricked for transfer onto a substitute cartoon tha
was used for the actual fresco, augmented by incisions into the plas
ter.126 He probably began his construction of the profile portraits of
Giovanna and her young sister-in-law Lodovica by referring to thei
medals, yet in each case the painted portrait presents a more refined,
mature, and dignified woman. Whichever mode was used for his var-
ious depictions of the Tornabuoni pendant, in that case too general-
ized idealization was the result. Whereas the pearls appear perfect
spheres in Giovanna's panel portrait (Fig. 1), the documentation o
Lodovica's dowry in 1493 noted that they were a little elongated
and one was slightly uneven.127 Similarly, Ghirlandaio refined Giovan-
na's features and body shape as he built up the layers of paint in that
profile portrait.
Michelangelo, who worked in the Tornabuoni chapel as an appren-
tice from 1487 for at least a year and probably more, famously opined
that naturalistic exactitude was unimportant in portraits because in a
thousand years "no one will be able to know that they were other-
wise."128 Although, indeed, we cannot be certain what they actually
looked like in every particular, in the case of Lorenzo Tornabuoni
and his successive wives Giovanna and Ginevra, we can be reasonably
sure about where, when, and why they were portrayed in late fifteenth
century Florence.
125 Cadogan 2000, 176, 276-277, no. 45, and 304, no. 109 for the drawing; Elena Greer
in Campbell et al. 2008, 244-247, no. 77.
126 On the drawing in Chatsworth and its use, see Bambach 1999, 37, 240-241, 287 (and
152, 258, 337, 344-346 and passim for broader comments on his working method with draw
ings in the chapel); Brown 2001, 200-201; Cadogan 2000, 144, 151, 291-292, no. 79.
127 The document is quoted in Hatfield 2009, 34, n. 140 ("tre perlle fine bianche ben
fatte; anno un pocho e' lungho et un pocho rognose").
128 Cadogan 1993, 30-31; for the quotation, Steinmann and Wittkower 1927, 241.
129
9
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bayer, Andrea (ed.), Art and Love in Renaissance Italy , exhibition catalog,
York, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 2008.
Biliotti, Modesto, "Chronica Pulcherrimae Aedis Magnique Coenobii S. Mar
cognomento Novellae Florentinae Civitatis", in Analecta Sacri Ordinis Frat
Praedicatorum , ser. 3, 1 (1893-94), 2 (1895-96), 3 (1897-98), 12 (1915-16),
(1917-18).
Bo, Carlo and Gabriele Mandel, L'opera completa del Botticelli , Milan, 1978.
Borsook, Eve and Johannes Offerhaus, Francesco Sassetti and Ghirlandaio at Santa
Trinità, Florence: History and Legend in a Renaissance Chapel , Doornspijk, 1981.
Brockhaus, Heinrich (Enrico), Ricerche sopra alcuni capolavori d'arte fiorentina ,
Milan, 1902.
Brown, David A. (ed.), Virtue and Beauty: Leonardo's " Ginevra de} Benci " and Re-
naissance Portraits of Women. Exhibition catalog, Washington DC, National Gal-
lery of Art, 2001.
Cadogan, Jean, "Michelangelo in the Workshop of Domenico Ghirlandaio", Bur-
lington Magazine , 135 (1993): 30-31.
- Domenico Ghirlandaio : Artist and Artisan , New Haven, 2000.
Campbell, Caroline, "Lorenzo Torn abuoni' s History of Jason and Medea Series:
Chivalry and Classicism in 1480s Florence", Renaissance Studies , 21 (2007): 1-19.
- with contributions by Graeme Barraclough and Tilly Schmidt, Love and Mar-
riage in Renaissance Florence : The Courtauld Wedding Chests , Exhibition catalog,
London, Courtauld Gallery, 2009.
Campbell, Lorne et al ., Renaissance Faces: Van Eyck to Titian , London, 2008.
130
Campbell, Stephen J. and Michael W. Cole, Italian Renaissance Art , New York
2012
131
132
Offerhaus, Johann, "Motief en Achtergrond. Studies over het Gebruik van de Ar-
chitektuur in de 15e eeuwse Florentijnse Schilderkunst", PhD diss., University of
Amsterdam, Printed Utrecht, 1976.
Paléologue, Maurice, "Le portrait de Giovanna Tornabuoni par Domenico Ghir-
landaio", Gazette des beaux-arts , 18 (1897): 493-497.
Pampaloni, Guido, "Tornaquinci, poi Tornabuoni, fino ai primi del cinquecento",
Archivio storico italiano , 126 (1968): 331-362.
Paolini, Claudio, Daniela Parenti and Ludoica Sebregondi (eds.), Virtù d'amore.
Pittura nuziale nel quattrocento fiorentino , exhibition catalog, Florence, Galleria
dell'Accademia e Museo Home, Florence, 2010.
Parenti, Piero, Storia fiorentina , edited by Andrea Matucci, 2 vols., Florence,
1994-2005.
Partridge, Loren and Randolph Starn, A Renaissance Likeness: Art and Culture in
Raphael's Ujulius IT' Berkeley, 1980.
Pattilo, N. Allen Jr., "Botticelli as a Colorist", Art Bulletin , 36 (1954): 203-220.
Pedroli Bertoni, Maria and Miranda Prestipino Moscateli, Villa Tornabuoni-
Lemmi di C areggi, Rome, 1988.
Pegazzano, Donatella, "Giovanni Tornabuoni", in Encyclopedia of Italian Renais-
sance and Mannerist Art , edited by Jane Turner, 2:1627-1628, London, 2000.
Perosa, Alessandro (ed.), Giovanni Rucellai ed il suo Zibaldone , London, 1960.
Plebani, Eleonora, I Tornabuoni. Una famiglia fiorentina alla fine del Medioevo , Mi-
lan, 2002.
133
Poliziano, Angelo, Prose volgari inedite e poesi latine e greche , Florence, 1867.
Pollard, J. G., Medaglie Italiane del Rinascimento nel Museo Nazionale del Bargello
vol. 1, 1400-1530 , Florence, 1984.
- with Eleonora Luciano and Maria Pollard, Renaissance Medals , vol. 1, Italy
Washington DC, 2007.
Pons, Nicoletta, Botticelli. Catalogo completo , Milan, 1989.
Pope-Hennessy, John, The Portrait in the Renaissance , Princeton NJ, 1966.
Prinz, Wolfram and Max Seidel (eds.), Domenico Ghirlandaio 1449-1494 . Atti d
convegno internazionale Firenze, 16-18 ottobre 1994 , Florence, 1996.
Preyer, Brenda, " Around and in the Gianfigliazzi Palace in Florence: Developments
on Lungarno Corsini in the 15th and 16th Centuries", Mitteilungen des Kunsthist
rischen Institutes in Florenz , 48 (2004): 55-104.
Randolph, Adrian, "Performing the Bridal Body in Fifteenth-Century Florenc
Art History , 21 (1998): 182-200.
Ridolfi, Enrico, "Giovanna Tornabuoni e Ginevra de' Benci nel coro di S. Ma
Novella in Firenze", Archivio storico italiano , 5, 6 (1890): 426-456.
de Roover, Raymond, The Rise and Decline of the Medici Bank 1397-1494 , Cam
bridge MA, 1963.
Ross, Janet, The Lives of the Early Medici as Told in Their Correspondence , London
1910.
134
- "Women in Frames: The Gaze, the Eye, the Profile in Renaissance Portraiture
History Workshop , 25 (1988): 4-30.
Simons, Patricia and Monika Schmitter, Review of exhibitions. Renaissance St
dies, 23, no. 5 (2009): 718-727.
Sitwell, Frances, "Types of Beauty in Renaissance and Modern Painting,,> Art Jour
nal (1889): 5-11.
VAN DER Sman, Gert Jan, "Sandro Botticelli at Villa Tornabuoni and a Nuptial Poem
by Naldo Naldi", Mitteilungen des Kunsthistorischen Institutes in Florenz , 5
(2007): 159-186.
- Lorenzo & Giovanna: Schoonheid en noodlot in Florence , Leiden, 2009.
- Lorenzo and Giovanna : Timeless Art and Fleeting Lives in Renaissance Florence ,
translated by Diane Webb, Florence, 2010.
VAN der Sman, Gert Jan (ed.), Ghirlandaio y el Renacimiento en Florencia , Madrid
2010.
135