Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Description
This course is dedicated to producing succinct, effective writing and presentations by
focusing on core sets of audience concerns. It has three related goals:
1) To develop a set of writing and presenting skills that will help students on their exams
within the program and in a professional environment
2) To find, digest, and repackage information about important events and trends within
students’ subfields
3) To use these skills to develop materials that students can use to present themselves as
members of a larger professional community
These goals point the course in two directions. They encourage students to look outward toward
the broader context of their chosen subfields and industries, but they also ask students to think
deeply about their own role within these larger contexts so that they can begin to formulate
professional personas. The course’s written materials and presentations reflect these twin
orientations, all with the aim of preparing students to perform the necessary task of presenting
themselves as informed and integral members of their industries in professional contexts that
range from social media and networking to cover letters and job interviews.
Additionally, the E295 course series is designed to fulfill the following objectives:
Students will communicate clearly, professionally, and persuasively:
○ Extemporaneously frame, engage, and solve engineering problems in front of technical
and non-technical audiences
○ Use clear, concise, meaningful, and persuasive language to share technical knowledge
with stakeholders in varied cultural and organizational settings
○ Convey technical expertise with enthusiasm, confidence, and sincerity necessary to
build long-term professional relationships
○ Communicate with a “bias to action,” focus on the why as well as the how, inspire and
persuade others, and propel meaningful change
Assignments
Reading and writing assignments for this class will be short, but something will be due
each week (see calendar below). Expect to spend between two and three hours on each
assignment. Readings will be available on our bCourses site or through library links—there are
no required texts. The Mayfield Handbook of Technical and Scientific Writing will be a useful
resource for much of the course (Perelman, Leslie C., James Paradis and Edward Barrett, The
Mayfield Handbook of Technical and Scientific Writing. (Mountain View: Mayfield, 1998).
Available online: https://www.mit.edu/course/21/21.guide/).
Electronic copies of assignments should be submitted to our bCourses site—see specific
assignments for details.
Assignment Calendar
September 16th Finding Articles: Research Methods In your notes: List of possible
industries, companies, or
people to request informational
interviews with
October 7th Part III: What’s Your Vision? Industry Trends Synthesis
Argument; Science Op-Eds;
Thesis statements; Executive Summaries
October 14th Op-Ed strategies; Science Op-Ed Executive
Executive Summary workshop Summary
Grades
Papers/Writings…………………………………………………….65%
Bio Blurb (3%)
Industry Trends Annotated Bibliography (7%)
Industry Trends Paragraph (5%)
Industry Trends Synthesis (10%)
Science Op-Ed Executive Summary (5%)
Science Op-Ed (10%)
Statement of Purpose (10%)
Final Paper Revision (15%)
Presentations………………………………………………………..20%
Career Odyssey (5%)
Informational Interview Reflection (5%)
Final presentation (10%)
Participation……………………..……………………………...…..15%
In-class discussions and other activities (5%)
Writing group activities and meetings (10%)
Note: In keeping with Fung Institute policies, final grades may be subject to curving. Your final
grade may be higher or lower than your individual assignment grades would lead you to expect.
This class does not use the bCourses gradebook to calculate course grades.
Conversions: Scale:
A 95 B 85 A 100-92 B+ 89-88
A- 91 B- 81 A- 91-90 B 87-82
B+ 89
Attendance
Each student is allowed one absence with no questions asked. If you miss additional
classes for reasons other than medical or family emergencies, your overall course grade will be
reduced by 1⁄3 of a letter grade for each missed class beyond the first (e. g. the second missed
class drops the possible course grade from an A to an A-). Exceptions may be made for
important professional development activities like job interviews; just let me know beforehand.
If you are feeling sick, please do not come to class. Follow university and public health
guidelines around self-isolating and testing until you know it’s safe to return to campus. Let me
know where you are in the process and we’ll excuse the absence(s).
If issues surrounding the problematic use of sources arise, our policy is as follows:
First time: The paper gets a C. You should talk to your grader about the issue, and you
have the option to rework the sections for possible full credit. If the problems
have not been resolved on resubmission, the C stands.
Second time: The paper gets a D. You should talk to your grader about the issue, and
you have the option to rework the sections for a one letter-grade penalty (so an A
paper would get no better grade than a B). If the problems have not been resolved
on resubmission, the D stands.
Third time: The paper gets an automatic F.
We retain the right to give no credit to overtly or intentionally plagiarized papers.
Write a short biographical paragraph (100-200 words) detailing your professional background,
achievements, and interests. As part of the Fung community, you should use our staff bios to
guide you in selecting the kind of information to include. You can find them here:
https://funginstitute.berkeley.edu/programs-centers/full-time-program/leadership-
development/engineering-leadership-teaching-team/