Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
BY
(R166194U)
I TINOTENDA SAMSON MAKUVAZA hereby declare that this dissertation submitted for
assessment is my own composition. I produced all the information presented, except where
clearly and specifically acknowledged, at the University of Zimbabwe, Department of
Mechanical Engineering. This work has not been presented in the fulfilment of a similar or
related degree(s) program.
DATE:
SIGNED:
Abstract
The Osbourne Reynolds set up better describes the behavior of fluid when subjected to different
conditions, mainly temperature. Hence for this to happen the set up requires that a unit for
regulating the temperature be set up. This project outlines the design of a temperature
regulating system that uses of a thermo-electric device which in-cooperates the inclusion of
passive heat exchanger called a heat sink. A thermoelectric cooler (TEC) is a type of cooler that
uses the electricity between the junction of two materials to cause a temperature drop. As such
the temperature regulating unit for the set up operates using the Peltier effect. Effectively, a TEC
uses electrical energy to pump heat from one area to another. An understanding of the science of
how TECs operate as well as their design will be investigated and finally, a unique design for a
TEC with a high efficiency is presented. This report creates a design of a high efficiency
temperature regulating section that operates at a high coefficient of performance. The design
will also include phase change material that will differentiate it from its competition and allow
for superior cooling and efficiency. The design will also feature vacuum sealed chambers that
will provide very good insulation and allow fast optimal cooling mechanisms. A unique heat sink
is designed to optimally dissipate the heat that is removed by the TECs. The model can also
examine the variables that affect the thermal system that are controllable in the design of the
regulating unit. Given the new design, the regulating unit in this report was designed to cool a
volume of 15 litres of hot water for the largest temperature range (100-20) in a space of 3
minutes given a constant 12 V power supply. The theoretical analysis concludes that this design
is sufficient at creating a regulating unit with a high efficiency that can cool to the desired low
temperature for the experiment.
This project has been made approved and certified executed due to the professional and
intellectual supervision of Dr. L.K Gudukeya and Eng. T Chikuku not forgetting the
unquantifiable support and assistance most especially in acquisition of materials and information
that has helped in the realization of success in this project.
Appreciation goes to my Head of Department of the department, Eng. T Chikuku for the
meaningful contribution in managerial, academic and productive criticism. It has helped to
sharpen some crooked views and attitude.
Table of Contents
Declaration.......................................................................................................................2
Abstract............................................................................................................................3
Acknowledgement...........................................................................................................4
Table of Contents.............................................................................................................5
List of Tables...................................................................................................................8
Table of figures................................................................................................................9
Chapter 1 Introduction................................................................................................................11
1.2 Background........................................................................................................................12
1.5 Justification........................................................................................................................14
1.5.2 Time...........................................................................................................................14
1.6 Aim....................................................................................................................................14
1.7 Objectives..........................................................................................................................14
2.2.2 Finning.......................................................................................................................18
2.2.5 Baffles........................................................................................................................19
2.3 Augmentation....................................................................................................................19
Chapter 3 Methodology..............................................................................................................27
4.1.1 Advantages................................................................................................................32
4.1.2 Disadvantages............................................................................................................32
Design Option 2 Plate Heat exchangers (Air cooled finned type heat exchanger).33
4.2.2 Advantages................................................................................................................34
4.2.3 Disadvantages............................................................................................................34
4.3.2 Advantages................................................................................................................36
4.3.3 Disadvantages............................................................................................................36
5.7 Time required for cooling 15 litres for maximum temperature difference........................45
Chapter 7 Conclusion.................................................................................................................62
List of Tables
Table 4-3.6-1 1 Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Parts List...............................................................31
Table 4.1-1Finned Heat Exchanger Parts List...............................................................................33
Table 4.4-1 Binary Dominance Matrix..........................................................................................37
Table 4.4-2 The Design Solution Scoring.....................................................................................38
Table 6.1-1 Cost of electrical components....................................................................................65
Table 6.1-2 Cost of Mechanical Components...............................................................................66
Table 6.1-3 Grand total Cost.........................................................................................................66
Table of figures
Figure 1.5.1-1 The Osborne Reynolds Apparatus At the University of Zimbabwe......................12
Figure 1.5.1-2 Thermal conductivity apparatus currently being used for temperature adjustment
purposes.........................................................................................................................................13
Figure 2.1.1-1 Parallel flow heat exchange working principle (Glacial Tech, 2020)...................15
Figure 2.1.2-1 counter flow working principle (Glacial Tech, 2020)...........................................15
Figure 2.1.2-2 one-shell, two pass tube heat exchanger (BrainKart, 2020)..................................16
Figure 2.1.2-3 'Two-shell-pass, four-tube-pass' exchanger...........................................................16
Figure 2.1.3-1 Cross flow working principle (BrainKart, 2020)...................................................16
Figure 2.1.5-1 Compact heat exchangers: flat tubes, continuous plate fins and plate fin (single
pass) (Researcgate, 2020)..............................................................................................................17
Figure 2.6.1-1 Air cooled heat exchanger (Anon, 2010)...............................................................22
Figure 2.6.2-1 Modernized liquid cooling system (BV Thermal Systems, 2016).........................23
Figure 2.7.1-1 Slag Wool (Kramer, 2020).....................................................................................24
Figure 2.7.1-2 Construction on chilled water pipe (Kramer, 2020)..............................................24
Figure 2.7.1-3 Cellular(nitrile rubber) insulation sheets...............................................................24
Figure 2.8.1-1Peltier element schematic. Thermoelectric legs are thermally in parallel and
electrically in series.......................................................................................................................26
Figure 2.8.1-1 Time Response Curve............................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
Figure 2.8.1-1 Arduino Control section code................................................................................29
Figure 2.8.1-2 Designing temperature regulator using Autodesk inventor 2017..........................29
Figure 2.8.1-3 Simulation Analysis in Ansys18............................................................................30
Figure 4.1.3-1 Proposed construction layout.................................................................................32
Figure 4.1.3-2 Air cooled fin type heat exchanger........................................................................33
Figure 4.1.3-3 Detailed view of the finned heat exchanger...........................................................33
Figure 4.2.1-1 Proposed construction layout.................................................................................34
Figure 4.2.3-1 Shell and tube heat exchanger with Baffles...........................................................35
Figure 4.2.3-2 Shell and Tube heat exchanger..............................................................................35
Figure 4.3.1-1 Proposed Construction Layout...............................................................................36
Figure 4.3.3-1 Developed Model of the temperature regulation for the Osbourne Reynolds setup
.......................................................................................................................................................39
Figure 4.3.3-1 Placement of Thermal Electric Coolers.................................................................41
Figure 4.3.3-2 The cooling body...................................................................................................42
Figure 4.3.3-1 Selected Heat Sink.................................................................................................43
Figure 4.3.3-2 Temperature Distribution In a Single Fin..............................................................44
Figure 5.8.3-1 Temperature sensor................................................................................................50
Figure 5.8.4-1 LCD Crystal display..............................................................................................51
Figure 5.8.5-1 Relay switch...........................................................................................................52
Figure 5.8.5-2 Process flow...........................................................................................................52
Figure 6.1.1-1 Temperature Distribution in Fin for Varying L.....................................................55
Figure 6.1.1-2 Q vs Fin Length.....................................................................................................55
Figure 6.1.2-1 Temperature Distribution in Fin Varying length...................................................56
Figure 6.1.2-2 Fin Height effect on the heat transfer in a fin........................................................57
Figure 6.1.3-1 Temperature in fin for varying fin thickness.........................................................58
Figure 6.1.3-2 Heat Transfer due to convection for varying fin thickness....................................59
Figure 6.1.4-1 Heat Transfer coefficient effect on the temperature distribution in a fin..............60
Figure 6.1.4-2 Heat transfer coefficient on the heat transfer rate..................................................61
Figure 6.1.4-1 Circuit diagram......................................................................................................65
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 General Introduction
According to Course-hero (2019) Osbourne Reynolds experiment is used to investigate the
characteristic of the flow of the liquid in the pipe which is also used to determine the Reynolds
Number for each state of the flow. The design of the apparatus allowed studying the characteristic
of the flow of the fluid in the pipe, the behavior of the flow and also to calculate the range for the
laminar and turbulent flow where the calculation is used to prove the Reynolds number is
dimensionless by using the Reynolds Number formula.
The experiment is conducted mainly to study the criterion of laminar, transition and turbulent flow.
In fluid mechanics, internal flow is defined as a flow for which the fluid is confined by a surface.
The flow may be laminar or turbulent[ CITATION Mil16 \l 2057 ]. Osborne Reynolds Apparatus
consists of water resource for the system supply, fix-head water input to big and small transparent
pipes, dye input by injection unit, and water output unit to determine water flow rate. The laminar,
transition and turbulent flows can be obtained by varying the water flow rate using the water outlet
control valve. Water flow rate and hence the flow velocity is measured by the volumetric
measuring tank. The supply tank consists of glass beads to reduce flow disturbances. Flow patterns
are visualized using dye injection through a needle valve. The dye injection rate can be controlled
and adjusted to improve the quality of flow patterns[ CITATION For01 \l 2057 ].
The apparatus also consists of a separate temperature regulating free standing unit. It connects to
the water supply line to the water, varying its temperature and viscosity. Controls on the module
vary the electrical input and the flow rate, to give steady conditions over a range. The most
commonly used heating system consists of the heated system that contains the heating plant and
the control unit[ CITATION Mil16 \l 1033 ]. It forms the thermal system. If the control unit is
working automatically, we can speak about an automatically controlled thermal system.
These systems can have various configuration and structures. System configurations can include an
electric, hydraulic, hot air and/or similar system. The heating plant and its power consumption
depend on the size of the heated system, on its inner temperature and on the outer temperature. The
energy source is usually a burner (natural gas, oil, coal.) or an electric heater (heating resistor, arc
furnace, Peltier cell.)[ CITATION Gla20 \l 2057 ]
1.2 Background
The Osborne Reynolds Apparatus was brought to the University of Zimbabwe Mechanical
engineering lab so as to allow students to conduct experiments on fluid flow concepts that is how
each fluid behaves under different conditions[ CITATION GAN96 \l 2057 ]. The equipment
includes a vertical head tank that provides a constant head of water through a bell mouth entry to
the flow visualization glass pipe. Stilling media (marbles) are placed inside the tank to
tranquilize the flow of water entering the pipe. The discharge through this pipe is regulated by a
control valve and can be measured using a measuring cylinder. The flow velocity, therefore, can
be determined to calculate Reynolds number. A dye reservoir is mounted on top of the head tank,
from which a blue dye can be injected into the water to enable observation of flow conditions. In
this experiment, the dye injected into a laminar flow will form a clear well-defined line.
It will mix with the water only minimally, due to molecular diffusion. When the flow in the pipe
is turbulent, the dye will rapidly mix with the water, due to the substantial lateral movement and
energy exchange in the flow. There is also a transitional stage between laminar and turbulent
flows, in which the dye stream will wander about and show intermittent bursts of mixing,
followed by a more laminar behavior. Temperatures is continuously varied throughout the whole
process.
For temperature regulating purposes the thermal conductivity apparatus is sometimes used which
relies upon the basis of thermal conductivity of a metal to vary the temperature of the water until
the required value is reached[ CITATION Las01 \l 2057 ].
1.5 Justification
1.5.1 Eliminating effects of ambient temperature
The operation of the experiment has to be separated from the outside environment. For an
individual to have a correct sets of results, temperature for that particular test has to be kept
constant. Hence one can conclude how each fluid behaves or deduce the characteristics of fluid
at that particular instance.
1.5.2 Time
Currently the university relies upon one set of apparatus. However huge numbers of students are
limited to getting the basic knowledge of the experiment since much time is taken to adjust one
set of temperature value. Consequently, boredom and lack of focus largely on their part is
impacted hence the need of a temperature regulating section that fast and reliable.
1.6 Aim
To design a mechanically operated temperature regulating unit for the Osbourne
Reynolds experiment set up.
1.7 Objectives
To adjust the temperature of water ( 15 Litres ) to any value within a short space of time on
a temperature scale of 0−100 ℃
To automatically pump the temperature adjusted water to the experiment set up.
To install an effective insulating system around the apparatus.
Chapter 2 Literature Review
The design of the temperature regulating unit for the Osborne Reynolds is mainly centered on
refrigeration principles and heat exchange mechanisms.
Figure 2.1-3 Parallel flow heat exchange working principle[ CITATION Gla20 \l 2057 ]
2.1.3
Figure 2.1-5 'Two-shell-pass, four-tube-pass' exchanger. Figure 2.1-6 one-shell, two pass tube heat exchanger[ CITATION
Bra20 \l 2057 ]
Cross flow
A cross-flow heat exchanger has the two fluid streams flowing at right angles to each other.
Figure 2.1-5 illustrates such an arrangement an automobile radiator is a good example of cross-
flow exchanger. These exchangers are 'mixed' or 'unmixed' depending upon the mixing or not
mixing of either fluid in the direction transverse to the direction of the flow stream and the
analysis of this type of heat exchanger is extremely complex because of the variation in the
temperature of the fluid in and normal to the direction of flow
Figure 2.1- 8 Compact heat exchangers: flat tubes, continuous plate fins and plate fin (single pass)[ CITATION Res20 \l 2057 ]
2.2.2 Finning
Tubes can be finned on both the interior and exterior. This is probably the oldest form of heat
transfer enhancement. Finning is usually desirable when the fluid has a relatively low heat
transfer film coefficient as does a gas. The fin not only increases the film coefficient with added
turbulence but also increases the heat transfer surface area. This added performance results in
higher pressure drop. However, as with any additional surface area, the fin area must be adjusted
by efficiency. This fin efficiency leads to an optimum fin height with respect to heat
transfer[CITATION GAN96 \l 2057 ].
2.2.5 Baffles
Baffles are designed to direct the shell side fluid across the tube bundle as efficiently as possible.
Forcing the fluid across the tube bundle ultimately results in a pressure loss. The most common
type of baffle is the single segmental or cut segmental baffle shown in figure 3 which changes
the direction of the shell side fluid to achieve cross flow. Deficiencies of the segmented baffle
include the potential for dead spots in the exchanger and excessive tube vibration. Baffle
enhancements have attempted to alleviate the problems associated with leakage and dead areas in
the conventional segmental baffles.
The baffles may result in shell reductions of approximately 10-20%. Comparison of exchanger,
with and without baffles, shows that baffles have the vital role in heat transfer rate. The results
also show that the effect of changing the number of baffles is more important than varying the
height of baffles for heat transfer rate inside the shell. Increasing Reynolds number in shell-side
causes the increase of heat transfer rate. Reynolds number can be increased by adding the
number of baffles more easily and with less cost as compared to increasing the inlet velocity of
the fluid [ CITATION Van16 \l 2057 ].
2.3 Augmentation
Whenever inserts technologies are used for the heat transfer enhancement, along with the
improvement in the heat transfer rate, the pressure drop also increases, which induces the higher
pumping cost. Therefore, any augmentation device or methods utilized into the heat exchanger
should be optimized between the benefits of heat transfer coefficient and the higher pumping
cost owing to the increased frictional losses. The objective of the heat transfer augmentation can
be achieved by increasing the surface heat surface coefficient through improving the thermal
contact of the heat exchanger fluid with the wall. In general, heat transfer augmentation methods
are classified into three broad categories[ CITATION Kup02 \l 2057 ]:
Q=UA ∆T lm
Q is the rate of heat transfer between the two fluids in the heat exchange
and ∆ T lm is the log mean temperature difference calculated from the inlet and outlet
temperatures of both fluids.
Where
The required heat transfer rate can be determined from known flow rate, heat capacity and
temperature change for either the hot fluid or the cold fluid. Then either the flow rate of the other
fluid for a specified temperature change, or the outlet temperature for known flow rate and inlet
Air cooled heat exchangers are used in a wide variety of applications. Common air to liquid to
liquid applications include but are not limited to lube oil coolers, water and glycol coolers, jacket
water coolers, engine radiators, hydraulic oil coolers (both stationary and mobile), and closed-
loop cooling systems. Common air to air or air to gas applications include but are not limited to
inter/after coolers on compressors, belt guard after-coolers blower coolers, biogas cooling,
landfill gas cooling, soil vapour. A schematic view of exchanger is depicted in figure 2.6-1
below.
Figure 2.6-9 Air cooled heat exchanger[ CITATION Ano10 \l 2057 ]
1.1.1.1
Figure 2.7-12 Slag Wool[ CITATION Kra20 \l 2057 ] Figure 2.7-11 Construction on chilled water pipe[ CITATION
Kra20 \l 2057 ]
Granular Insulation
It is composed of small nodules which may contain voids or hollow spaces. It is not considered a
true cellular material since gas can be transferred between the individual spaces. This type may
be produced as a loose or pourable material, or combined with a binder and fibers or undergo a
chemical reaction to make a rigid insulation. Examples of these insulations are calcium silicate
and vermiculite.
A Peltier cooler can also be used as a thermoelectric generator. When operated as a cooler, a
voltage is applied across the device, and as a result, a difference in temperature will build up
between the two sides. When operated as a generator, one side of the device is heated to a
temperature greater than the other side, and as a result, a difference in voltage will build up
between the two sides. However, a well-designed Peltier cooler will be a mediocre
thermoelectric generator and vice versa, due to different design and packaging requirements.
control programs for the design was created. The code was based on the C++ computer language
under which the control and command instruction were created. The figure 3.6-1 below shows
the Arduino Catalogue Box.
Thermal simulations were performed using the ANSYS platform to determine the functionality
and best performance for various condition. Figure below 3.6-3 depicts the simulation analysis of
a shell and tube exchanger
4.1
Part Description
1 Cap
2 Reducer Tee
3 Inner tube
4 Outer tube
5 Reducer Tee
6 Cap
Figure 3.6-20 Detailed view Table 4- 3.6- 1 1 Double Pipe Heat Exchanger Parts List
Working principle
A double pipe heat exchanger (also sometimes referred to as pipe in exchanger) was chosen as
the first design option for the cooling mechanism of the temperature regulating unit for the
Osbourne Reynolds set up. As shown in the figure 4.1.1.1-1 above, the exchanger comprises of a
tube in tube out structure i.e., it consists of two pipes, one within the other. One fluid flows
through the inner pipe (analogous to the tube side in a shell and tube type exchanger whilst the
other flows through the outer pipe, which surrounds the inner pipe.
4.1.1 Advantages
Double pipe heat exchangers are cheap for both design and maintenance, making them a
good choice for small scaled operations in this case the Osborne Reynolds.
4.1.2 Disadvantages
low efficiency.
The fluid has to be passed into the double pipe heat exchanger several times for
temperature adjustment, hence time consuming
Design Option 2 Plate Heat exchangers (Air cooled finned type heat exchanger)
Figure 4.1-22 Air cooled fin type heat exchanger
Part Description
1 Casing
2 Tubes
3 Fan Mount
4 Blades
4.2.2 Advantages
This method of cooling employs the cheapest means of cooling that is the surrounding
ambient air.
Plate heat exchangers weigh less, require less, require less space and are more efficient
compared to other heat exchangers of the same size.
Replacing and cleaning the plates is a simple task because the plate stack can be opened
easily.
Maintenance is easy and can be easily cleaned.
4.2.3 Disadvantages
Bonding material between the plates limits operating temperatures of the cooler.
Design Option 3 Shell and tube heat exchanger
exchanger consists of a shell (a pressure vessel) with a bundle of tubes inside it. One fluid runs
through the tubes, whilst another fluid flows over the tubes that is being guided by baffles (half
semi-circles shown in figure 4.2-2 to transfer heat between the two fluids. The set of baffles
enclosing the tube bundles as shown in figure 4.2-2 directs the fluid flowing in inlet one thus
exchanging heat between the two mediums
4.3.1 Proposed layout
4.3.2 Advantages
The fluid under test doesn’t necessarily require more passes for temperature adjustments
due to enhanced large surface area for heat exchange to take place
Capable of providing a larger surface area for transfer to take place whilst having a
shorter length overall due to presence of multiple tubes
It is easy to find and isolate leaking tubes
Tubes can be double walled to reduce the likelihood of the shell fluid leaking into the
tube side fluid (vice versa)
Relatively simple design and easy to maintain.
4.3.3 Disadvantages
Less efficient as compared than plate heat exchangers
Require more space to open and remove tubes
Cooling capacity cannot be increased, but a plate exchange’s can be.
4.4 Selection of optimal solution.
The proposed three solutions meet the research objective in one way or another to reasonable
extents. However, among them, is one solution that will satisfy the objectives in the best way.
Selection of the optimal solution will be made basing on the following aspects of the design:
Functionality
Temperature adjustment response rate
Cost
Maintainability
Efficiency
Quality
These have been specifically selected in line with the design objectives set in Chapter one of the
research. However, the aspects do not carry the same weight as to the contribution of design
selection. The binary dominance matrix method of weighting will be used to allocate the
appropriate weight for each aspect.
Functionality 0 0 0 0
Temperature 1 0 0 1
Adjustment
Response Rate
Cost 1 1 0 1
Maintainability 1 1 1 1
Efficiency 1 0 0 0
Table 4.4- 3 Binary Dominance Matrix
The following equation will be used to determine the weight of each aspect.
number ofones
weight= *100
total aspect
With the selection aspects in place, each design solution is then rated basing on how it meets the
objective aspects put forward. The following table shows the scoring of each design
Concepts
Functionality Response Rate Cost Maintainability Total
/80 /40 /20 /10 /60
Double Pipe 40 20 15 8 83
Heat
Exchanger
Shell and Tube 60 25 10 7 102
Heat Exchanger
The selection table allocates each design with its total score. The (Air cooled) Finned type heat
exchanger has the highest scoring and is therefore the optimal solution found for the available
design objectives.
Chapter 5 Development of the Optimum Solution
5.1 Concept description
The temperature regulation unit for the Osbourne Reynolds set up involves the cooling water
from the 100 degrees’ reference point to the required temperature value. The chosen concept
uses the conventional radiator system similar to the one used in engine cooling. Equidistant fins
located around the radiator body ensures heat is dissipated to the surrounding environment. The
body houses copper pipes which have turns for heat loss purposes. A 12v draft fan attached to
the body ensures that the velocity of air flow through the cooling pipes is increased for heat loss
purposes. The process is cheaper since it can be made from existing old radiator system and air
in this cases is the coolant. However, the concept needs some improvements as it is quite generic
and huge. More time will be required to reach the required temperature value. Hence the
significance of this chapter is to develop the concept and add some special features to make sure
time is reduced as outlined in the objectives.
Figure 5.1-28 Developed Model of the temperature regulation for the Osbourne Reynolds setup
Figure 5.1-1 shows a temperature regulating system with the capability of cooling 15 litres of
water as required by the experiment. The model consists of a tank with heater element installed.
Water is tapped from supply into the tank where it is heated until it reaches the 100-degree
Celsius point which is the references point for the experiment. Water at 100 degrees is then piped
at varying flow rates into cooler body which has turns and passes. A passive heat exchanger
called a heat sink is placed on top of the cooler body for cooling purposes. A temperature sensor
placed inside the body denotes if the corrected temperature is reached and automatically opens
the electrical outlet valve (not shown in diagram). The water is then quickly pumped to the
experiment set up. The piping system will feature a vacuum sealed around the pipes to provide
very strong insulation.
Heat sink
Thermal electric cooling module (Peltier module)
Phase change material
Mounted on top of the cooler body are thermal electric coolers (TECs). A heat sink which is a
key aspect of the Peltier module, will be attached on top of each TECs to allow heat to be
continually drawn from the cooler and dissipated into the ambient room. In between the module
and heat sink is a Phase Change Material(PCM) or sometimes referred to as thermal paste
thermal paste. PCM has a very high latent heat of fusion which means its enthalpy changes easily
when subjected to a change in energy. For the application in this cooling system, it is beneficial
to use them since they help the TECs to cool the inside of the cooler body. As the module is
turned off and no longer supplied power, the layer of PCM will continue to keep the interior of
the cooler at a low temperature for a duration. The heat that is removed by the thermoelectric
coolers will then be dissipated by a heat sink located at the top of the cooler. A centrally located
fan will be located on the heat sink and force air through the heat sink to aid in the heat
dissipation. The key feature will be discussed more in detail in the design process.
To begin, the velocity of the air moving through the channels was determined.
Q
v=
Cp ρ∆T
120
v= =20.748 CFM
kJ Kg
( 1
kgK)( )
× 1.225 3 ×(10 K )
m
Using this value and the known diameter of the rectangular channel that the air will be flowing
through it can be found that air moves through individual channel is 6.81 m/s. Using this value
and the Reynolds and Nusselt correlations the heat transfer coefficient was found as
W
h=
( 0.02624
mk ) 1
2
1
8
× 0.664 ×36909 × 0.707 =35.823Wm −2
K−1
0.085 m
With the dimensions of the fin and the heat transfer coefficient of the air flowing through the
channel and considering, it can be found that,
At =NA f + A b=0.00557 m2
A f =2 w Lc =0.00544 m 2
t
Lc =L+ =0.032 m
2
n f =tanh m Lc = ¿ =0.944 ¿
m Lc
hP
m=
√ k Ac
=13.305
P=2 w +2t=0.172m
θb =T b −T ∞=5 ℃
Using all of these values it is possible to find the temperature distribution throughout the fin.
Figure 5.6-2describes the temperature distribution from a fin. This temperature distribution is the
temperature of the fin at a given distance, x, from the base of the fin. This distribution helps to
display how well the heat is being dissipated by the fin. As shown, the temperature of the fin
drops as the point of interest is moved further away from the base of the fin.
Figure 5.6-32 Temperature Distribution In a Single Fin
Using the data described in the figure above, the total rate of heat transfers due to convection,
can be found for this fin design. The total rate of heat transfer due to convection from one fin can
be found as 0.924 W. The number of fins required for the heat sink to dissipate the desired 120
W of heat can then be found by
120 W
number of fins needed =
qt
It is found that this fin design would require 130 fins to dissipate the heat removed by the TECs
so this design must be altered.
5.7 Time required for cooling 15 litres for maximum temperature difference
In order to obtain a better understanding of the cooling process of the TEC, a thermal model is
useful to understand the many different thermal effects taking place on the Cooler. While the
TECs remove heat from the inside of the cooler to cool the beverages, there are other factors
acting against the TEC cooling to heat the interior of the cooler. The factors that will be
examined in this model are the cooling of the TECs, the heat transferring to the cooler from
conduction and radiation, the heat that is absorbed by the water due to its latent heat, and the
sensible heat causing transfer to the cooler. For the steady state process, the cooling, 𝑄𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔,
produced by the cooler is equal to the sum of the heat, 𝑄𝐻, transferred to the cooler through
conduction and radiation, is the heat, 𝑄𝐿𝐻, absorbed by the water due to its latent heat, and the
heat, Q s , l and Qs , m transferred to the cooler due to the sensible heat, which can be expressed as
Q LH +Q s ,l +Q s , m
Q cooling=Q H +
t
Q H is the heat transfer rate transferred to the cooler through conduction and radiation;
Q LH is the heat transfer rate absorbed by the water due to its latent heat;
Q s , land Qs , mare the heat transfer rate transferred to the cooler due to the sensible heat
The energy equation was used to determine the amount of time required for the cooler to reach
the desired temperature. As done in the heat sink sizing, the value of the amount of heat removed
by the TECs was assumed. Therefore, it is assumed that the TECs remove heat at a rate of 120 W
or 120 J/s. This assumption provides a value of 120 W for Q cooling
The heat transfer rate to the cooler through conduction and radiation(Q¿¿ h)¿ can be expressed
as;
T h−T c
Q h=
RCOND , i+ R COND ,0 + R RAD
σ ( T h4 −T c 4 )
h RAD=
1 1
+
ε1 ε2
5.68 ×10−8 ¿ ¿
With the value of ℎ𝑅𝐴𝐷, using the surface area of the outer layer of the steel body and the
radiation thermal resistance can be found as
1
R RAD =
hRAD Ao
1
¿ =0.865 K W −1
(3.851)(0.3)
solutions must be found for the heat lost in conduction for the inner and outer layers of the cooler
walls. The conductive thermal resistances for the outer and inner walls can be found by
r2 0.1106
ln ln
r1 0.11 −1
RCOND , i= = =0.000167 K W
2 πLk 2 π × 0.32× 16.2
r2 0.0125
ln ln
r1 0.0119 −1
RCOND , 0= = =0.000167 K W
2 πLk 2 π ×0.32 ×16.2
T h−T c
Q h=
RCOND , i+ R COND ,0 + R RAD
100−12
Q H= =14.99
0.000167+0.0015+0.865
Next is to determine the heat absorbed by the phase change material during its phase change.
Q LH can be found by solving
Q LH =m Lf =1.307× 200000=261440 J
The value of the mass was found by using the geometry of the phase change material layer of the
cooler to determine the volume and multiplying it by the known value of the density of the phase
change material. The latent heat of fusion is a known value for the phase change material and is
the amount of heat consumed by the phase change material to complete a solid-liquid phase
change. The last values that need to be determined are the sensible heats caused by the steel
body and the contents of the cooler. For this the masses of both the steel body and the water that
is inside the cooler box must be found as well as determining the specific heat of both materials.
The solutions for both Q s , l and Q s , m=¿ can be found below
Hence the time taken to cool to the required temperature can then be determined
261440+270171.2+13624
120 W =14.99 W +
∆t
∆ t=150 seconds
It is important to note that 𝑄𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 is the heat that is being removed by the thermoelectric
coolers and that 𝑄𝐻 is the heat that is being added due to conduction and radiation from outside
the cooler. It is shown that because 𝑄𝑐𝑜𝑜𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 is so much larger, the cooler will have a net of
105.01 W being removed by the thermoelectric coolers. This shows that it would take
approximately ∆ t=150 seconds∨3 minutes
The amount of power that will be consumed by the thermoelectric coolers, can be found by
Q out =Q¿ +W
where Q out is the heat transfer rate removed by the thermoelectric coolers, W is the power
consumed by the thermoelectric cooler, and Q ¿ can be found by
Q ¿ =COP ×W =0.5 W
Q out 120
W= = =80 W by each Peltier module
1.5 1.5
where COP is the coefficient of performance. As shown in the equations above the higher the
coefficient of performance is, the less power will be consumed by the thermoelectric coolers.
The power consumed by thermoelectric for each heat sink TEC can be found by
W =IV
where I is the current drawn and V is the input voltage
It is then possible to determine the current drawn by the thermoelectric coolers by using the
known
80
I= =6.667 A
12
The flow chart below summarizes the connection of these components in regard to temperature
correction.
Figure 5.8- 36 Process flow
Fig. 6.1-6 shows that the temperature distribution is better for the smaller thickness values. This
is true in that the further away from the base of the fin the temperature is lower, but this does not
mean that the thinner fin is better for dissipating heat. From Fig. 6.1-7, it is clear that heat will be
dissipated at a faster rate for a thicker fin. This is interesting because although a thicker fin can
dissipate heat at a faster rate, the end of the fin from the base is cooler for a thin fin. This
phenomenon is explained because a thicker fin allows for a more uniform dissipation of the heat.
Because the fin is thicker, more heat is able to travel to the end of the fin causing it to be warmer
than the thin fins that do not dissipate the heat as evenly. It is important to note that the
difference in the fin design that dissipates the most heat and the fin design that dissipates the
most heat is not as large for varying thicknesses as it is for other variables. A fin with a thickness
of 0.0005 operates at a rate of heat transfer due to convection of 1.72 W, where the fin with the
thickness of 0.002 operates at a rate of heat transfer due to convection of 1.90 W. Even
increasing the thickness by a magnitude of 4 does not very strongly affect the performance of the
fin. With this in mind, the other variables will be of more importance in the final design than fin
thickness.
6.1.4 Varying Heat Transfer Coefficient
The initial design utilized a heat transfer coefficient of 35.08𝑊 𝑚2𝐾. This value was found
using the air properties and velocity found from calculating the necessary volumetric flow rate
needed to dissipate the desired heat in ideal conditions. In this model, the heat transfer
coefficient values will range from 20𝑊 𝑚2𝐾 to 47𝑊 𝑚2𝐾. Figure 6.1-7 shows that as the heat
transfer coefficient increases, the temperature distribution in the fin increases. This is correct in
that as the heat transfer coefficient increases, it allows for heat to be dissipated at a faster rate
causing the ends of the fins to be cooler. Fig. 6.1-8 displays how the heat transfer rate due to
convection is very affected by the heat transfer coefficient of the air flowing through the
channels. Of all of the four variables that were tested, the heat transfer coefficient of the air had
the greatest impact of determining the rate of heat transfer due to convection.
This is expected as the heat transfer coefficient describes the ability for the heat to be transferred
over the area that it is flowing through. In this application, heat transfer coefficient is largely
dependent on the velocity of the air flowing through the channels.
Figure 6.1- 43 Heat Transfer coefficient effect on the temperature distribution in a fin
Figure 6.1- 44 Heat transfer coefficient on the heat transfer rate
Chapter 7 Conclusion
APPENDIX A SOFTWARE DESIGN
Appendix A1 Function code
Temperature Controller Arduino Code
Program is constructed using one library “LiquidCrystal”. Program have different modules,
Setup, Loop. In setup we initialize all the IO connections and LCD, Keypad. In main loop we are
taking set point inputs and constantly measure current temperature and compare it with set
points. If it is more than set point turn off heater, else turn on heater.
/*
circuits4you.com
Digital Temperature Controller
*/
#include <LiquidCrystal.h>
// initialize the library with the numbers of the interface pins
LiquidCrystal lcd(9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4);
const int LED_RED=10; //Red LED
const int LED_GREEN=11; //Green LED
const int RELAY=12; //Lock Relay or motor
//Key connections with arduino
const int up_key=3;
const int down_key=2;
int SetPoint=30;
//=================================================================
// SETUP
//=================================================================
void setup(){
pinMode(LED_RED,OUTPUT);
pinMode(LED_GREEN,OUTPUT);
pinMode(RELAY,OUTPUT);
pinMode(up_key,INPUT);
pinMode(down_key,INPUT);
//Pull up for setpoint keys
digitalWrite(up_key,HIGH);
digitalWrite(down_key,HIGH);
// set up the LCD's number of columns and rows:
lcd.begin(16, 2);
// Print a message to the LCD.
lcd.print("circuits4you.com");
lcd.setCursor(0,1); //Move coursor to second Line
lcd.print("Temp. Controller");
digitalWrite(LED_GREEN,HIGH); //Green LED Off
digitalWrite(LED_RED,LOW); //Red LED On
digitalWrite(RELAY,LOW); //Turn off Relay
delay(2000);
}
//=================================================================
// LOOP
//=================================================================
void loop(){
double Temperature = ((5.0/1024.0) * analogRead(A0)) * 100; //10mV per degree 0.01V/C. Scalling
lcd.setCursor(0,0);
lcd.print("Temperature:"); //Do not display entered keys
lcd.print(Temperature);
//Get user input for setpoints
if(digitalRead(down_key)==LOW)
{
if(SetPoint>0)
{
SetPoint--;
}
}
if(digitalRead(up_key)==LOW)
{
if(SetPoint<150)
{
SetPoint++;
}
}
//Display Set point on LCD
lcd.setCursor(0,1);
lcd.print("Set Point:");
lcd.print(SetPoint);
lcd.print("C ");
//Check Temperature is in limit
if(Temperature > SetPoint)
{
digitalWrite(RELAY,LOW); //Turn off heater
digitalWrite(LED_RED,LOW);
digitalWrite(LED_GREEN,HIGH); //Turn on Green LED
}
else
{
digitalWrite(RELAY,HIGH); //Turn on heater
digitalWrite(LED_GREEN,LOW);
digitalWrite(LED_RED,HIGH); //Turn on RED LED
}
delay(100); //Update at every 100mSeconds
}
//==========================================
Appendix A2 Circuit diagram
7 Kordyban, T. (1998). Everything you know about cooling electronics is wrong. . New
York: ASME Press.
8 Lasance, C. a. (2001). A Method to Rank Heat Sinks in Practice: The Heat Sink
Performance Tester. 21st IEEE SEMI-THERM Symposium.
9 Sergent, J., & Krum, A. (1998). Thermal management handbook for electronic
assemblies . McGraw-Hill.
11 Vaughn, A. (2020, February 3). Overview of cooling ethods for AC-DC and DC-DC
Power Supplies. Retrieved from aegispower: http://www.aegispower.com