Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
PROJECT REPORT ON
April 2020
1
AUTHORIZATION
April 2020
2
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Our project would not have been completed without the guidance and supervision of
our supervisor DR. Bibek Baral, and our project coordinator Dr. Sunil Prashad
Lohani.
Our heartfelt gratitude goes to countless reader of this project report, who is the
most important critic and commentator. We welcome constructive comments and
suggestions which will help us to do better one.
At last we would like to thank those people who gave their helping hands directly or
indirectly for this project.
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF TABLES..........................................................................................................6
LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................7
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................8
LIST OF SYMBOLS......................................................................................................9
ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................10
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................11
1.1 Background........................................................................................................11
1.2 Objectives...........................................................................................................15
1.3 Significance.........................................................................................................15
1.4 Limitations..........................................................................................................15
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY.................................................................................16
4
2.2.6 Fabrication.................................................................................................27
2.2.8 Recalibration..............................................................................................28
2.2.9 Documentation...........................................................................................28
EXPECTED OUTCOME.............................................................................................32
REFRENCES................................................................................................................33
5
LIST OF TABLES
6
LIST OF FIGURES
7
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
8
LIST OF SYMBOLS
9
ABSTRACT
10
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background
The low LTC provides the desired refrigeration effect at relatively low temperature.
The condenser in the low temperature cycle is thermally coupled to the evaporator in
the HTCThus,
the evaporator in the high temperature cycle only serves to extract the heat released
by the condenser in the low
temperature cycle. Then this heat is rejected to the ambient air or water stream in the
condenser of the high
temperature cycle. A cascade refrigeration system can operate with a low
evaporating temperature, lower
compression ratio and high compressor volumetric efficiency in comparison with a
single-stage refrigeration
system.
1.2 Objectives
11
1.3 Significance
1.4 Limitations
12
CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY
In many industrial and medical applications, we need temperature below -40°C for
that, a single stage vapour compressor cannot be used. There are some natural
refrigerants like NH3 and CO2, which are being widely used in many industrial
refrigeration system. Energy analysis gives more accurate results which provide
recommendations for refrigeration system improvement.
In the literature, there is a significant part of studies that investigate the CO2 Cascade
refrigeration. The majority of the studies investigate systems with CO2 in the low-
temperature circuit and NH3 in the high-temperature circuit. CO2 is a refrigerant with
low critical temperature (~31◦C), which leads to transcritical refrigeration cycles,
especially in warm climates during the summer period. The transcritical operation is
associated with a reduced coefficient of performance (COP) and thus the CO2 faces
limitations on this domain. It requires high operating pressure of 10 MPA for larger
temperature difference.
Another promising configuration in the cascade system with CO 2in the low-
temperature circuit and other refrigerants in the high-temperature circuit. This
system seems to be more efficient than the others, especial for the warm climates.
The use of CO2 in the low stage solves the problem of the low critical point which
leads to the transcritical operation and also makes the system to operate with lower
pressure levels. In the high-temperature circuit, usually, natural refrigerants are used
with NH3 to be the most usual selection, as well as R290 R717 and R134a can also
be used.
13
2.2 System description
14
2.2.1 Literature Review
Cascade refrigeration is a term you will hear more and more over the coming years,
and while some of the systems may be very complex, the concept is actually pretty
simple.
Some refrigerants are well suited for high and medium temperature applications, and
some are better suited and for a lower temperature applications. In a cascade
system the high/medium temp refrigerant circuit is used to cool the condenser of the
low temp circuit by way of a heat exchanger.
In essence, the condenser for the low temp system is also the evaporator or part of
the evaporator of the high/medium temp system.
Methodology
In this analysis a set of equations or energy balance is prepared.
EES software is used to solve these equations.
The result is compared by using different refrigerant pair for cascade
refrigeration system.
15
General Assumptions
The mass, energy and exergy balance equation are applied for all the components in proposed
system.
∑¿ m=∑ m
out
Q+ ∑ mh=W +∑ mh
¿ out
where Q is, heat transfer rate and W is work transfer rate and h is specific enthalpy
Energy Balance:
16
m 5 (h6 s−h5 )
W HTC=
ηm , HTC
whereW HTC is work rate and ηm ,HTC is mechanical efficiency of compressor of high
temperature cycle.
2. Expansion valve
Mass balance
m 8=m7
Energy balance
h7 =h8
3. Condenser
Mass balance
m 6=m7
Energy Balance
Q HTC ,con =m7 (h6−h7 )
Where Q HTC ,con is the heat rate of condenser of high temperature cycle.
4. Cascade Condenser
Mass balance
m5=m8
m 3=m 2
Energy Balance
Q LTC , con=m5 (h5 −h8 ) = m3 (h3 −h2)
Where Q LTC , con is the heat rate of condenser of low temperature cycle.
5. Compresser
17
Mass balance
m 1=m 2
Energy balance
m1 (h 2 s−h1 )
W LTC =
ηm ,L TC
6. Expansion valve
Mass balance
m 4 =m 3
Energy balance
h 4=h 3
7. Evaporator
Mass balance
m 4 =m 1
Energy balance
Q LTC , evap=m1 (h1 −h4 )
where Q LTC , evap is heat transfer rate of evaporator of low temperature cycle.
18
And the Carnot COP is calculated by
TE
COPcarnot =
T C+ T E
Results:
19