RMIT Classification: Trusted #_x000D_

Peer Assessment Form MKTG1205 S3 2021

Team Name: Team 5
Self-rater name: Le Mai Quynh

Instruction: Fill up the name, ID and role of the members

Member Name
M1 Le Mai Quynh
M2 Hoang Minh Chu
M3 Dang Thu Ngan
M4 Nguyen Thi Mai Anh
M5 Pham Thi Hong Anh
M6 Bui Chan Bao Chau
M7

Instruction: For every student, rate 1-4 for each of the criteria

1. Participation Category
Criterion
1: Group member did not participate, wasted time, or worked on unrelated material.
2: Group member participated but wasted time regularly or was rarely on task.
3: Group member participated most of the time and was on task most of the time.
4: Group member participated fully and was always on task in class.

Name
M1 Le Mai Quynh
M2 Hoang Minh Chu
M3 Dang Thu Ngan
M4 Nguyen Thi Mai Anh
M5 Pham Thi Hong Anh
M6 Bui Chan Bao Chau
M7
 RMIT Classification: Trusted #_x000D_

2. Listening Category
Criterion
1: Group member did not listen to others and often interrupted them.
2: Group member sometimes did not listen to others' ideas.
3: Group member usually listened to others' ideas.
4: Group member listened carefully to others' ideas.

Name
M1 Le Mai Quynh
M2 Hoang Minh Chu
M3 Dang Thu Ngan
M4 Nguyen Thi Mai Anh
M5 Pham Thi Hong Anh
M6 Bui Chan Bao Chau
M7

3. Feedback Category
Criterion
1: Group member did not offer constructive or useful feedback.
2: Group member occasionally offered constructive feedback, but sometimes the comments were inappro
3: Group member offered constructive feedback when appropriate.
4: Group member offered detailed, constructive feedback when appropriate.

Name
M1 Le Mai Quynh
M2 Hoang Minh Chu
M3 Dang Thu Ngan
M4 Nguyen Thi Mai Anh
M5 Pham Thi Hong Anh
M6 Bui Chan Bao Chau
 RMIT Classification: Trusted #_x000D_

M7

4. Cooperation Category
Criterion
1: Group member often treated others disrespectfully or did not share the workload fairly.
2: Group member sometimes treated others disrespectfully or did not share the workload fairly.
3: Group member usually treated others respectfully and shared the workload fairly.
4: Group member treated others respectfully and shared the workload fairly.

Name
M1 Le Mai Quynh
M2 Hoang Minh Chu
M3 Dang Thu Ngan
M4 Nguyen Thi Mai Anh
M5 Pham Thi Hong Anh
M6 Bui Chan Bao Chau
M7

5. Time Management Category

Criterion
1: Group member did not complete most of the tasks on time and often forced the group to make last- min
2: Group member often did not complete tasks on time, and held up completion of project work.
3: Group member usually completed tasks on time and did not hold up progress on the projects because o
4: Group member completed tasks on time.

Name
M1 Le Mai Quynh
M2 Hoang Minh Chu
M3 Dang Thu Ngan
 RMIT Classification: Trusted #_x000D_

M4 Nguyen Thi Mai Anh

M5 Pham Thi Hong Anh
M6 Bui Chan Bao Chau
M7

Team Name:
AVERAGE SCORES OF TEAM MEMBERS
Name
M1 Le Mai Quynh
M2 Hoang Minh Chu
M3 Dang Thu Ngan
M4 Nguyen Thi Mai Anh
M5 Pham Thi Hong Anh
M6 Bui Chan Bao Chau
M7

*Note: Action will be taken for those groups with any member scoring below 50%
 RMIT Classification: Trusted #_x000D_

Student ID Member/Leader
s3927473 Leader
s3926119 Member
s3926938 Member
s3928857 Member
s3925988 Member
s3926095 Member

unrelated material.
rarely on task.
most of the time.

Rating (1-4)
4
4
4
4
4
4
 RMIT Classification: Trusted #_x000D_

Rating (1-4)
4
4
4
4
4
4

ut sometimes the comments were inappropriate or not useful.

appropriate.

Rating (1-4)
4
4
4
4
4
4
 RMIT Classification: Trusted #_x000D_

share the workload fairly.

d not share the workload fairly.
the workload fairly.
kload fairly.

Rating (1-4)
4
4
4
4
4
4

d often forced the group to make last- minute adjustments and changes to accommodate missing work.
d up completion of project work.
old up progress on the projects because of incomplete work.

Rating (1-4)
4
4
4
 RMIT Classification: Trusted #_x000D_

4
4
4

Team 5
AM MEMBERS
Average rating (/4) Percentage
4 100%
4 100%
4 100%
4 100%
4 100%
4 100%

Take Action: NO

er scoring below 50%