Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Real World US IP/Patent Practice Webinar Series
Real World US IP/Patent Practice Webinar Series
It would be very interesting and attractive if a real world example can be shared which
demonstrates the portfolio built from scratch and lead to business success in the end
The most important thing is to let people know that a planned IP/Patent portfolio strategy is
US Patent System Uniques focuses on the special types of patent applications. Of special
importance are the Provisional Application and both successful and failed real world cases
that teach stakeholders about the unique strategic benefits of provisional applications.
one. This section would focus on the concept of Continuation Application (CP & CIP). Both
successful and failed real world cases that teach stakeholders about the unique strategic
AFCP 2.0, Amendment After Final & Advisory Action, RCE, XPR, IPR, PGR, CBM and
other procedures. Both successful and failed real world cases that utilize those procedures
from either the patentee or the challenger perspective to their benefits would be expected.
successful and failed real world cases that follow and didn’t follow certain special
U.S.-rules are worth sharing and would be helpful for stakeholders seeking to leverage
and backgrounds thereof are explained, both successful and failed real world cases are to
be introduced, the former one showing the audience how the 35 U.S.C. 101 problem is
teach the audience how to define the invention completely with alternatives and variations,
with particular care to identify the improvements that will contribute to patentability,
avoiding common mistakes that will unnecessarily limit the scope of protection. Successful
and failed real world cases, which describe what matters and not sounding like an
infomercial, whose Detailed Description of the Invention hit the happy medium between
being specific and nuance while maintaining breadth, are highly recommended.
applicant's points of view of claim interpretation and why it is important, the definition of
and product-by-process claims. All demonstrated with real world cases which bring good
basic claim drafting techniques for a variety of different types of claims, including device,
method, means plus function and system claims. Again, real world good & bad cases are
expected.
office action following a First Action on the Merits (FAOM) or Final Action. Quality OAs
should be evaluated for completeness as well as technical and procedural accuracy and
winning expected results for the applicant. Both successful and failed real world cases are
to be presented.
including: when an interview may be held, who may participate, and how an interview
should be conducted and documented in a strategic way. Both successful and failed real
IDS (during prosecution, after grant and before litigation etc.), FFL and fee topics. Both
successful and failed real world cases are expected. For example, a good case that
leverages the PTE earns great returns for the patentee (a drug patent that fights for an
even several days PTE to make remarkable profits from drug selling) while a bad case
may be one that did not get the FFL right and got in trouble later.
讲师团基本构成:
原任或现任中国/美国专利审查员、原任或现任资深企业 IPR、原任
或现任法官/律师、原任或现任法学院教授、原任或现任资深专利代理师。
讲师团成员平均具备 10 年+知识产权(专利)从业经历、硕士+学历、
副研究员(或等同)以上职称。