Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The prompt:
Examine the ways in which the global issue of your choice is presented through the content
and form of two of the works that you have studied.
• (for an older text) Is what this text says about the global issue still relevant today? • (for
an older text) Has what this text says about the global issue changed over time? • How
do you think your interpretation may differ from that of one of the text’s original readers?
• How does the cultural or historical context of each text influence the way the author
writes about this global issue?
• To what extent does the extract/text give you an insight into the way another culture
perceives the global issue?
• Does the author reflect, promote or challenge the accepted views on the global issue in
his/her cultural context?
• Has the text had an influence on the way the global issue is perceived in its cultural
context? Has it had a wider influence?
• How does the extract/text represent social distinctions and identities of its time and
place, and how are these representations connected to the global issue? • To what
extent is it important for us to know about the author’s life/context when interpreting
what the text says about this global issue?
• To what extent is it important for us to know about the text’s historical/cultural context
when interpreting what it says about this global issue?
• What influence does your cultural and historical context have on the way you
interpret what this text says about the global issue?
Intertextuality
• How does the literary form or genre of each text affect the way it presents the global
issue?
• Are there any ways that the author conforms to, or challenges, the conventions of the
literary form or genre? How do these contribute to the presentation of the global
issue?
• (if relevant) How does the text use allusions to other texts in its portrayal of this
global issue?
• What are the similarities between these two texts and the way they present the global
issue?
• What are the most significant differences between the two texts and how they
present the global issue?
• Has looking at the two texts together changed the way you see this global issue? • If
these two texts were ‘in an argument’ about the global issue, which would win and why?
© David White, InThinking
2
www.thinkib.net/englishalit