Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VIETNAM
ALLTHE DATAAND TRENDS YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND INTERNET,
SOCIAL MEDIA, MOBILE, AND E-COMMERCE BEHAVIOURS IN 2019
GLOBALOVERVIEW
5
JAN DIGITALAROUND THEWORLD IN2019
2019 THE ESSENTIAL HEADLINE DATA YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND GLOBAL MOBILE, INTERNET, AND SOCIAL MEDIA USE
SOURCES:POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; WORLD BANK; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; EUROSTAT;
7 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; REPORTS IN REPUTABLE MEDIA. SOCIAL MEDIA: PLATFORMS’ SELF-SERVE ADVERTISING TOOLS; PRESS
RELEASES AND INVESTOR EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS; ARAB SOCIAL MEDIA REPORT; TECHRASA; NIKI AGHAEI; ROSE.RU. (ALL LATESTAVAILABLE DATA IN JANUARY 2019).
JAN INTERNETPENETRATIONBYREGION
2019 INTERNET USE BY REGION, COMPARING THE NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS TO TOTAL POPULATION (REGARDLESS OF AGE)
NORTHERN
EUROPE EASTERN
EUROPE
95
NORTHERN
AMERICA
80
95 WESTERN
EUROPE 94 88 50 CENTRAL
ASIA
SOUTHERN
EUROPE 60 EASTERN
ASIA
CARIBBEAN NORTHERN
AFRICA 50 66
63 51 MIDDLE
WESTERN 42
ASIA
AFRICA SOUTHERN
CENTRAL
AMERICA
41 ASIA
WESTERN 12 63 SOUTH-EASTERN
ASIA
AFRICA
73 32 EASTERN
AFRICA
SOUTHERN
AMERICA 51 69
SOUTHERN OCEANIA
AFRICA
SOURCES:INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; WORLD BANK; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES AND REGULATORYAUTHORITIES; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; REPORTS IN REPUTABLE
8 MEDIA. NOTE:PENETRATION FIGURES ARE BASED O N TOTALPOPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. REGIONS AS DEFINED BY THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME.
JAN SOCIALMEDIAPENETRATIONBYREGION
2019 BASED O N MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS OF THE MOST ACTIVE PLATFORMS IN EACH COUNTRY / TERRITORY, COMPARED TO TOTAL POPULATION
NORTHERN
EUROPE EASTERN
EUROPE
67
NORTHERN
AMERICA
48
70 WESTERN
EUROPE 53 58 16 CENTRAL
ASIA
SOUTHERN
EUROPE 70 EASTERN
ASIA
CARIBBEAN NORTHERN
AFRICA 40 54
62 46 MIDDLE
WESTERN 24
ASIA
AFRICA SOUTHERN
CENTRAL
AMERICA
12 ASIA
WESTERN 7 61 SOUTH-EASTERN
ASIA
AFRICA
66 8 EASTERN
AFRICA
SOUTHERN
AMERICA 38 57
SOUTHERN OCEANIA
AFRICA
SOURCES: LATEST DATA PUBLISHED BY SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS VIA PRESS RELEASES, INVESTOR EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS, AND IN SELF-SERVE ADVERTISING TOOLS; ARAB SOCIAL
9 MEDIA REPORT; TECHRASA; NIKI AGHAEI; ROSE.RU; KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE:PENETRATION FIGURES ARE BASED O N TOTAL POPULATION, REGARDLESS OF AGE. REGIONS AS DEFINED BY THE
UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME.
JAN SOCIALPLATFORMS:ACTIVEUSERACCOUNTS
2019 BASED O N MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS, USER ACCOUNTS, OR UNIQUE VISITORS TO EACH PLATFORM, IN MILLIONS
FA CEBO O K 2,271
YO UTUBE 1,900
W HATSAPP 1,500
FB MESSENGER 1,300
WEIXIN / WECHAT 1,083
IN STAGRA M 1,000
QQ 803
Q ZO N E 531
DOUYIN / TIKTOK 500
SINA WEIBO 446
REDDIT 330
TW ITTER 326
DO UBAN 320
LIN KEDIN * * 303
BAIDU TIEBA* 300
SKYPE* 300 SOCIAL NETWORK
SN APCHAT* * 287
VIBER* 260 MESSENGER / VOIP
PIN TEREST 250
LIN E 194
SOURCES:KEPIOS ANALYSIS; LATEST COMPANY EARNINGS RELEASES, PRESS RELEASES OR MEDIA STATEMENTS; REPORTS IN REPUTABLE MEDIA (ALLUP TO JAN 2019). *ADVISORY:PLATFORMS
10 IDENTIFIED BY (*) HAVE NOT PUBLISHED UPDATED USER FIGURES IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS, SO FIGURES MAY BE LESS RELIABLE. **NOTES: THESE PLATFORMS DO NOT PUBLISH MAU DATA.
LINKEDIN FIGURE IS BASED O N MONTHLY UNIQUE WEBSITE VISITORS IN DEC 2018, VIA SIMILARWEB. SNAPCHAT FIGURE EXTRAPOLATED FROM DATA REPORTED IN TECHCRUNCH (JUN 2017).
JAN TOPSOCIALMESSENGERS AROUND THEWORLD
2019 THE MOST POPULAR MESSENGER APP BY COUNTRY / TERRITORY IN DECEMBER 2018
WHATSAPP (133)
VIBER (10)
IMO (3)
LINE (3)
TELEGRAM (3)
WECHAT (3)
HANGOUTS (1)
KAKAOTALK (1)
ZALO (1)
UNK NO WN (11)
SOURCE:BASED O N SIMILARWEB’S ALGORITHM INTEGRATING CURRENT INSTALLS FROM THE GOOGLE PLAY STORE WITH ACTIVE APP USERS (DECEMBER 2018).
11 NOTE:FIGURES IN PARENTHESES IN THE LEGEND REPRESENT THE NUMBER OF COUNTRIES / TERRITORIES IN WHICH EACH PLATFORM IS THE TOP-RANKED MESSENGER APP.
JAN SOCIALMEDIAAUDIENCEPROFILE
2019 BASED O N THE COMBINED ADVERTISING AUDIENCES OF FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, AND FACEBOOK MESSENGER
19
FEMALE
16 MALE
13
11
9
7
5 5
4
3 3 3
2 2
13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+
YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD
12 SOURCE:EXTRAPOLATED FROM FACEBOOK DATA (JANUARY 2019); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: FACEBOOK DOES NOT PUBLISH AUDIENCE DATA FOR GENDERS OTHER THAN ‘MALE’ OR ‘FEMALE’.
JAN MOBILECONNECTIVITYBYREGION
2019 THE NUMBER OF MOBILE SUBSCRIPTIONS COMPARED TO TOTAL POPULATION (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE USERS)
NORTHERN
EUROPE EASTERN
EUROPE
120
NORTHERN
AMERICA
154
105 WESTERN
EUROPE 116 132 103 CENTRAL
ASIA
SOUTHERN
EUROPE 111 EASTERN
ASIA
CARIBBEAN NORTHERN
AFRICA 102 101
96 73 MIDDLE
WESTERN 91
ASIA
AFRICA SOUTHERN
CENTRAL
AMERICA
86 ASIA
WESTERN 53 129 SOUTH-EASTERN
ASIA
AFRICA
109 62 EASTERN
AFRICA
SOUTHERN
AMERICA 162 108
SOUTHERN OCEANIA
AFRICA
SOURCE:GSMA INTELLIGENCE (Q4 2018); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE:REGIONS AS DEFINED BY THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME. ADVISORY: MOBILE SUBSCRIPTIONS DO NOT REPRESENT
13 UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS, SO FIGURES OVER 100% INDICATE MULTIPLE MOBILE SUBSCRIPTIONS PER PERSON. REGIONS AS DEFINED BY THE UNITED NATIONS GEOSCHEME.
VIETNAM
14
JAN VIETNAM
2019 THE ESSENTIAL HEADLINE DATA YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND MOBILE, INTERNET, AND SOCIAL MEDIA USE
SOURCES:POPULATION: UNITED NATIONS; U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. MOBILE: GSMA INTELLIGENCE. INTERNET: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; WORLD BANK; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; EUROSTAT;
16 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; REPORTS IN REPUTABLE MEDIA. SOCIAL MEDIA: PLATFORMS’ SELF-SERVE ADVERTISING TOOLS; PRESS
RELEASES AND INVESTOR EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS; ARAB SOCIAL MEDIA REPORT; TECHRASA; NIKI AGHAEI; ROSE.RU. (ALL LATESTAVAILABLE DATA IN JANUARY 2019).
JAN OVERVIEW: POPULATION &ECONOMY
2019 ESSENTIAL DEMOGRAPHIC AND ECONOMIC INDICATORS
97% 5% [N/A] 1%
SOURCE: GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER (COLLECTED JANUARY 2018). *NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NOTES AT THE END OF THIS REPORT FOR MORE DETAILS OF HOW GOOGLE DEFINES
18 'ADULT POPULATION'. ADVISORY: GOOGLE HAS NOT UPDATED ITS CONSUMER BAROMETER DATA SINCE OUR 2018 REPORTS, BUT WE BELIEVE THAT THE DATASET STILL OFFERS REPRESENTATIVE
INSIGHTS INTO DIGITAL BEHAVIOURS IN THE FEATURED MARKETS.
JAN TIMESPENTWITHMEDIA
2019 AVERAGE DAILY TIME SPENT CONSUMING AND INTERACTING WITH MEDIA [SURVEY BASED]
AVERAGE DAILY TIME AVERAGE DAILY TIME AVERAGE DAILY TV VIEWING TIME AVERAGE DAILY TIME
SPENT USING THE SPENT USING SOCIAL (BROADCAST, STREAMING SPENT LISTENING TO
INTERNET VIA ANY DEVICE MEDIA VIA ANYDEVICE AND VIDEO O N DEMAND) STREAMING MUSIC
global
web
index
SOURCE:GLOBALWEBINDEX (Q2 & Q3 2018). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. TIMES ARE DAILY AVERAGES, REPORTED IN HOURS
19 AND MINUTES. NOTE:SOME ACTIVITIES MAY TAKE PLACE CONCURRENTLY.
INTERNETUSE
20
JAN INTERNETUSE:DEVICEPERSPECTIVE
2019 BASED O N ACTIVE INTERNET USER DATA, AND ACTIVE USE OF INTERNET-POWERED MOBILE SERVICES
global
web
index
SOURCES: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; WORLD BANK; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK; LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES; MIDEASTMEDIA.ORG; REPORTS IN REPUTABLE
21 MEDIA. MOBILE SHARE DATA: GLOBALWEBINDEX (Q2 & Q3 2018); AND EXTRAPOLATIONS OF DATA PUBLISHED BY THE WORLD’S LARGEST SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS VIA EARNINGS RELEASES
AND SELF-SERVE ADVERTISING TOOLS. GLOBALWEBINDEX FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
JAN INTERNETUSERS:DIFFERENTPERSPECTIVES
2019 DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES O N THE NUMBER OF INTERNET USERS, FROM SOME OF THE WORLD’S MOST COMPREHENSIVE STUDIES
22 SOURCE: INTERNETWORLDSTATS; ITU; WORLD BANK; CIA WORLD FACTBOOK (ALL LATEST DATAAVAILABLE IN JANUARY 2019).
JAN FREQUENCY OF INTERNETUSE
2019 HOW OFTEN INTERNET USERS ACCESS THE INTERNET FOR PERSONAL REASONS (ANY DEVICE)
1 7 31 365
94% 6% 0% 0%
23 SOURCE:GOOGLE CONSUMER BAROMETER (COLLECTED JANUARY 2018). ADVISORY: GOOGLE HAS NOT UPDATED ITS CONSUMER BAROMETER DATA SINCE OUR 2018 REPORTS, BUT WE
BELIEVE THATTHE DATASET STILL OFFERS REPRESENTATIVE INSIGHTS INTO DIGITAL BEHAVIOURS IN THE FEATURED MARKETS.
JAN INTERNETCONNECTIONSPEEDS
2019 AVERAGE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS FOR MOBILE AND FIXED INTERNET CONNECTIONS, WITH YEAR-ON-YEAR COMPARISON
SOURCE: SIMILARWEB (JANUARY 2019). FIGURES BASED O N MONTHLY AVERAGES FOR Q4 2018. NOTES: ‘MONTHLY TRAFFIC’ DOES NOT REPRESENT UNIQUE VISITORS. ‘TIME PER VISIT’
25 FIGURES REPRESENT THE AVERAGE DURATION OF USERS’ VISITS, MEASURED IN MINUTES AND SECONDS. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT
CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES.
JAN ALEXA’S TOPWEBSITES
2019 RANKING OF WEBSITES BY THE NUMBER OF VISITORS AND TOTAL PAGE VIEWS
# WEBSITE TIME/ DAY PAGES / VISIT # WEBSITE TIME/ DAY PAGES / VISIT
SOURCE: ALEXA (JANUARY 2019). NOTES: ‘TIME / DAY’ FIGURES REPRESENT ALEXA’S ESTIMATES OF THE AVERAGE DAILY AMOUNT OF TIME THAT VISITORS SPEND O N THE SITE FOR DAYS
26 WHEN THEY VISIT THE SITE, MEASURED IN MINUTES AND SECONDS. ADVISORY: SOME WEBSITES FEATURED IN THIS RANKING MAY CONTAIN ADULT CONTENT. PLEASE USE CAUTION WHEN
VISITING UNKNOWN WEBSITES.
JAN TOPGOOGLE SEARCHQUERIESIN2018
2019 BASED O N SEARCHES THROUGHOUT 2018
01 PHIM 100 11 SO XO 24
02 XSMB 51 12 24H 23
03 FACEBOOK 41 13 NHAC 17
06 XỔ SỐ 33 16 MINH NGOC 14
07 YOUTUBE 29 17 XS 13
09 GOOGLE 28 19 SXMB 11
SOURCE:GOOGLE TRENDS (ACCESSED JANUARY 2019); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN
27 SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUMES FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO SEARCH VOLUMES FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THAT THE QUERY RECEIVED 50%
OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY). YEAR-ON-YEAR CHANGE FIGURES COMPARE INDEX VALUES FOR EACH QUERY IN DECEMBER 2018 TO DECEMBER 2017.
JAN CONTENT STREAMINGACTIVITIES
2019 PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS WHO STREAM EACH KIND OF CONTENT EACH MONTH [SURVEY BASED]
WATCH VIDEOS STREAM TVCONTENT PLAY GAMES STREAMED WATCH LIVE STREAMS OF WATCH E-SPORTS
ONLINE VIA THEINTERNET LIVE VIA THEINTERNET OTHERS PLAYING GAMES TOURNAMENTS
28 SOURCE:GLOBALWEBINDEX (Q2 & Q3 2018). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
JAN USEOF INTERNETTECHNOLOGIES
2019 PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS THAT USE EACH TOOL OR SERVICE EACH MONTH
global
web
index
29 SOURCE:GLOBALWEBINDEX (Q2 & Q3 2018). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
SOCIAL MEDIA USE
30
JAN SOCIALMEDIAOVERVIEW
2019 BASED O N MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS OF THE MOST ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
TOTAL NUMBER ACTIVE SOCIAL MEDIA TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE ACTIVE MOBILE SOCIAL
OF ACTIVESOCIAL USERS AS A PERCENTAGE SOCIAL USERSACCESSING USERS AS A PERCENTAGE
MEDIA USERS OF TOTALPOPULATION VIA MOBILE DEVICES OF THE TOTALPOPULATION
SOURCES:LATEST DATA PUBLISHED BY SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS VIA PRESS RELEASES, INVESTOR EARNINGS ANNOUNCEMENTS, AND IN SELF-SERVE ADVERTISING TOOLS; ARAB SOCIAL
31 MEDIA REPORT; TECHRASA; NIKI AGHAEI; ROSE.RU; KEPIOS ANALYSIS.
JAN SOCIALMEDIABEHAVIOURS
2019 HOW INTERNET USERS ENGAGE WITH SOCIAL MEDIA [SURVEY BASED]
VISITED OR USED A SOCIAL ACTIVELY ENGAGED WITH AVERAGE AMOUNT AVERAGE NUMBER OF PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET
NETWORK OR MESSAGING OR CONTRIBUTED TOSOCIAL OF TIME PER DAYSPENT SOCIAL MEDIAACCOUNTS USERS WHO USE SOCIAL
SERVICE IN THE PAST MONTH MEDIA IN THE PAST MONTH USING SOCIALMEDIA PER INTERNET USER* MEDIA FOR WORK PURPOSES
global global
web web
index index
SOURCE:GLOBALWEBINDEX (Q2 & Q3 2018). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64. FIGURES FOR ‘TIME SPENT’ARE DAILY AVERAGES, IN
32 HOURS AND MINUTES.*NOTE: FIGURE FOR SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS MAY NOT INDICATE ACTIVE USE OF ALLACCOUNTS EVERY MONTH.
JAN MOST ACTIVESOCIALMEDIAPLATFORMS
2019 PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS WHO REPORT USING EACH PLATFORM [SURVEY BASED]
YO UTUBE 96
FACEBO OK 95
FB MESSENGER 79
ZALO 74
INSTAG RAM 51
TWITTER 37
SKYPE 33
VIBER 28
W ECHAT 23
LINE 23
LINKEDIN 22
W HATSAPP 20
PINTEREST 19 SOCIAL NETWORK
TWITCH 18 MESSENGER / VOIP
SNAPCHAT 16
REDDIT 16
33 SOURCE:GLOBALWEBINDEX (Q2 & Q3 2018). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
JAN SOCIALMEDIAADVERTISINGAUDIENCES
2019 A COMPARISON OF THE TOTALADDRESSABLE ADVERTISING AUDIENCE* OF SELECTED SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
TOTAL ADVERTISING TOTAL ADVERTISING TOTAL ADVERTISING TOTAL ADVERTISING TOTAL ADVERTISING
AUDIENCE O N FACEBOOK AUDIENCE O N INSTAGRAM AUDIENCE O N TWITTER AUDIENCE O N SNAPCHAT AUDIENCE O N LINKEDIN
(MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS) (MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS) (MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS) (MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS) (REGISTERED MEMBERS)
SOURCE: EACH PLATFORM’S SELF-SERVE ADVERTISING TOOLS (JANUARY 2019). *NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENTADDRESSABLE ADVERTISING AUDIENCES ONLY, AND MAY NOT REFLECT TOTAL
34 ACTIVE USERS OR MEMBER BASES. ADVISORY: FIGURES FOR LINKEDIN REPRESENT REGISTERED MEMBERS, SO ARE NOT DIRECTLY COMPARABLE TO FIGURES FOR OTHER PLATFORMS.
JAN SOCIALMEDIAAUDIENCES:QUARTERLYGROWTH
2019 THE QUARTERLY CHANGE IN THE TOTAL ADDRESSABLE ADVERTISING AUDIENCES* OF SELECTED SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS
QUARTERLY CHANGE IN QUARTERLY CHANGE IN QUARTERLY CHANGE IN QUARTERLY CHANGE IN QUARTERLY CHANGE IN
THE TOTAL ADVERTISING THE TOTAL ADVERTISING THE TOTAL ADVERTISING THE TOTAL ADVERTISING THE TOTAL ADVERTISING
AUDIENCE O N FACEBOOK AUDIENCE O N INSTAGRAM AUDIENCE O N TWITTER AUDIENCE O N SNAPCHAT AUDIENCE O N LINKEDIN
(MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS) (MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS) (MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS) (MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS) (REGISTERED MEMBERS)
SOURCE: EACH PLATFORM’S SELF-SERVE ADVERTISING TOOLS (JANUARY 2019). *NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENTADDRESSABLE ADVERTISING AUDIENCES ONLY, AND MAY NOT REFLECT TOTAL
35 ACTIVE USERS OR MEMBER BASES. ADVISORY: FIGURES FOR LINKEDIN REPRESENT REGISTERED MEMBERS, SO ARE NOT DIRECTLY COMPARABLE TO FIGURES FOR OTHER PLATFORMS.
JAN SOCIALMEDIAAUDIENCEPROFILE
2019 BASED O N THE COMBINED ADVERTISING AUDIENCES OF FACEBOOK, INSTAGRAM, AND FACEBOOK MESSENGER
19
FEMALE
16 MALE
15 15
8
7
5 4.7
3.3 3.5
1.4 1.7
0.4 0.8
13 – 17 18 – 24 25 – 34 35 – 44 45 – 54 55 – 64 65+
YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD YEARS OLD
36 SOURCE:EXTRAPOLATED FROM FACEBOOK DATA (JANUARY 2019); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTE: FACEBOOK DOES NOT PUBLISH AUDIENCE DATA FOR GENDERS OTHER THAN ‘MALE’ OR ‘FEMALE’.
JAN FACEBOOK AUDIENCEOVERVIEW
2019 BASED O N FACEBOOK’S TOTAL ADDRESSABLE ADVERTISING AUDIENCE
SOURCE: FACEBOOK (JANUARY 2019); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. *NOTE: FACEBOOK DOES NOT PUBLISH ADVERTISING AUDIENCE DATA FOR GENDERS OTHER THAN ‘MALE’ AND ‘FEMALE’.
37 ADVISORY: FIGURES REPORTED O N THIS CHART ARE BASED O N FACEBOOK’S ADDRESSABLE ADVERTISING AUDIENCE, AND MAY NOT MATCH TOTALMONTHLY ACTIVE USERS. AS A RESULT,
FIGURES O N THIS CHART ARE NOT DIRECTLY COMPARABLE TO THE ‘MONTHLY ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS’ FIGURE THAT WE REPORTED IN OUR DIGITAL 2018 REPORTS.
JAN FACEBOOK ACTIVITYFREQUENCY
2019 THE NUMBER OF TIMES A ‘TYPICAL’ USER* PERFORMS EACH ACTIVITY O N FACEBOOK
1 6 5 1 9
FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE MALE
1 1 8 6 7 4 2 1 12 8
38 SOURCE: FACEBOOK (JANUARY 2019). *NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT MEDIAN VALUES FOR ACTIVE FACEBOOK USERS AGED 18 AND ABOVE.
JAN FACEBOOK PAGE REACHBENCHMARKS
2019 AVERAGE MONTHLY GROWTH IN PAGE LIKES (‘FANS’), AVERAGE REACH OF PAGE POSTS, AND THE CONTRIBUTION OF PAID MEDIA
AVERAGE MONTHLY AVERAGE POST REACH AVERAGE ORGANIC PERCENTAGE OF PAGES AVERAGE PAID REACH
CHANGE IN PAGE LIKES vs. PAGE LIKES REACH vs. PAGE LIKES USING PAIDMEDIA vs. TOTAL REACH
SOURCE: LOCOWISE (JANUARY 2019). FIGURES REPRESENT AVERAGES FOR Q4 2018. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT AVERAGES FOR A BROAD RANGE OF DIFFERENT PAGES. O N AVERAGE,
39 PAGES WITH LARGER AUDIENCES (I.E. GREATER NUMBERS OF ‘PAGE LIKES) WILL EXPERIENCE LOWER LEVELS OF ORGANIC REACH. ADVISORY: MANY LARGE BRAND PAGES WILL EXPERIENCE
SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER LEVELS OF ORGANIC REACH AND ENGAGEMENT COMPARED TO THE AVERAGES QUOTED HERE.
JAN FACEBOOK ENGAGEMENTBENCHMARKS
2019 THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ENGAGE WITH A FACEBOOK PAGE’S POSTS vs. PAGE REACH
AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT AVERAGE ENGAGEMENT
RATE FOR FACEBOOK RATE FOR FACEBOOK RATE FOR FACEBOOK RATE FOR FACEBOOK RATE FOR FACEBOOK
PAGE POSTS (ALL TYPES OF PAGE VIDEO POSTS PAGE PHOTO POSTS PAGE LINK POSTS PAGE STATUS POSTS
POST, ALL TYPES OF PAGE*) (ALL TYPES OF PAGE*) (ALL TYPES OF PAGE*) (ALL TYPES OF PAGE*) (ALL TYPES OF PAGE*)
SOURCE: LOCOWISE (JANUARY 2019). FIGURES REPRESENT AVERAGES FOR Q4 2018. *NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT AVERAGES FOR A BROAD RANGE OF DIFFERENT PAGES. O N AVERAGE, PAGES
40 WITH LARGER AUDIENCES (I.E. GREATER NUMBERS OF ‘PAGE LIKES‘) WILL EXPERIENCE LOWER LEVELS OF ENGAGEMENT ACROSS ALL POST TYPES. ADVISORY: MANY LARGE BRAND PAGES WILL
EXPERIENCE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWER LEVELS OF ORGANIC REACH AND ENGAGEMENT COMPARED TO THE AVERAGES QUOTED HERE.
JAN INSTAGRAM AUDIENCEOVERVIEW
2019 BASED O N INSTAGRAM’S TOTAL ADDRESSABLE ADVERTISING AUDIENCE
41 SOURCE: INSTAGRAM (JANUARY 2019); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. *NOTE: INSTAGRAM DOES NOT PUBLISH ADVERTISING AUDIENCE DATA FOR GENDERS OTHER THAN ‘MALE’ AND ‘FEMALE’.
JAN TWITTERAUDIENCEOVERVIEW
2019 BASED O N TWITTER’S TOTAL ADDRESSABLE ADVERTISING AUDIENCE
42 SOURCE:TWITTER (JANUARY 2019); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. *NOTE: TWITTER DOES NOT PUBLISH ADVERTISING AUDIENCE DATA FOR GENDERS OTHER THAN ‘MALE’ AND ‘FEMALE’. GENDER SHARE
FIGURES EXTRAPOLATED FROMAVAILABLE DATA.
JAN LINKEDINAUDIENCEOVERVIEW
2019 BASED O N LINKEDIN’S TOTAL ADDRESSABLE ADVERTISING AUDIENCE
43 SOURCE: LINKEDIN (JANUARY 2019); KEPIOS ANALYSIS.*NOTE: LINKEDIN’S ADVERTISING AUDIENCE FIGURES ARE BASED O N TOTAL MEMBERS, NOT MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS. LINKEDIN DOES
NOT REPORTADVERTISING AUDIENCE FIGURES FOR GENDERS OTHER THAN ‘MALE’ OR ‘FEMALE’. GENDER DATA HAVE BEEN EXTRAPOLATED BASED O N AVAILABLE DATA.
JAN TOPYOUTUBE SEARCHQUERIESIN2018
2019 BASED O N SEARCHES O N THE YOUTUBE PLATFORM THROUGHOUT 2018
06 MA 19 16 NHAC TRE 8
07 PHIM HAY 11 17 DU DU DU DU 7
09 HÀI 11 19 BTS 7
10 BÚP BÊ 9 20 DOREMON 7
SOURCE:GOOGLE TRENDS (ACCESSED JANUARY 2019); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. NOTES: GOOGLE DOES NOT PUBLISH SEARCH VOLUMES, BUT THE ‘INDEX’ COLUMN SHOWS RELATIVE VOLUMES
44 FOR EACH QUERY COMPARED TO SEARCH VOLUMES FOR THE TOP QUERY (AN INDEX OF 50 MEANS THATTHE QUERY RECEIVED 50% OF THE SEARCH VOLUME OF THE TOP QUERY).
MOBILEUSE
45
JAN MOBILECONNECTIONS BYTYPE
2019 BASED O N THE NUMBER OF CELLULAR CONNECTIONS (NOTE: NOT UNIQUE INDIVIDUALS)
SOURCE:GSMA INTELLIGENCE (Q4 2018 AND JANUARY 2019). ADVISORY: GSMA INTELLIGENCE HAVE REVISED SOME HISTORICAL FIGURES IN THE PAST YEAR, SO THE FIGURES SHOWN HERE
46 MAY NOT BE DIRECTLY COMPARABLE TO THE DATA WE REPORTED IN OUR DIGITAL 2018 REPORTS.
JAN MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX
2019 GSMA INTELLIGENCE’S ASSESSMENT OF KEY ENABLERS AND DRIVERS OF MOBILE CONNECTIVITY
63.03
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
49.15
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
72.11
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
74.10
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
60.11
OUT OF A MAXIMUM
POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 POSSIBLE SCORE OF 100 POSSIBLE SCORE OF100
47 SOURCE:GSMA INTELLIGENCE. TO ACCESS THE COMPLETE MOBILE CONNECTIVITY INDEX, VISIT HTTP://WWW.MOBILECONNECTIVITYINDEX.COM/
JAN MOBILEACTIVITIES
2019 PERCENTAGE OF INTERNET USERS PERFORMING EACH ACTIVITY O N A MOBILE PHONE EACH MONTH [SURVEY BASED]
global global
web web
index index
48 SOURCE:GLOBALWEBINDEX (Q2 & Q3 2018). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
JAN MOBILEAPPS:INSTALLSvs. USAGE
2019 A CLOSER LOOK AT THE NUMBER OF APPS DOWNLOADED AND INSTALLED, COMPARED TO THE NUMBER OF APPS USED
49 SOURCE:APP ANNIE (JANUARY 2019); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. CONSUMER SPEND FIGURES ARE IN U.S. DOLLARS. NOTE: FIGURES REPRESENT VALUES FOR THE LOCAL COUNTRY / TERRITORY ONLY.
JAN MOBILEAPP RANKINGS: ACTIVEUSERS
2019 RANKINGS OF TOP MOBILE APPS AND GAMES BY AVERAGE MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS THROUGHOUT 2018
RANKING OF MOBILE APPS BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS RANKING OF MOBILE GAMES BY MONTHLY ACTIVE USERS
# APPNAME DEVELOPER # APPNAME DEVELOPER
SOURCE:APPANNIE (JANUARY 2019). BASED O N COMBINED DATA FOR ANDROID AND IPHONE DEVICES.
50 NOTE:DOES NOT INCLUDE DATA FOR DOWNLOADS FROM THIRD-PARTYANDROID STORES.
JAN MOBILEAPP RANKINGS:DOWNLOADS
2019 RANKINGS OF TOP MOBILE APPS AND GAMES BY THE NUMBER OF DOWNLOADS IN 2018
SOURCE:APPANNIE (JANUARY 2019). BASED O N COMBINED DATA FOR THE GOOGLE PLAYAND APPLE iOS APP STORES.
51 NOTE:DOES NOT INCLUDE DATA FOR DOWNLOADS FROM THIRD-PARTYANDROID STORES.
JAN MOBILEAPP RANKINGS:REVENUE
2019 RANKINGS OF TOP MOBILE APPS AND GAMES BY TOTAL REVENUE GENERATED IN 2018
SOURCE:APPANNIE (JANUARY 2019). BASED O N COMBINED DATA FOR THE GOOGLE PLAYAND APPLE iOS APP STORES.
52 NOTE:DOES NOT INCLUDE DATA FOR DOWNLOADS FROM THIRD-PARTYANDROID STORES.
E-COMMERCEUSE
53
JAN FINANCIALINCLUSIONFACTORS
2019 PERCENTAGE OF THE POPULATION AGED 15+ THAT REPORTS OWNING OR USING EACH FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR SERVICE
global global
web web
index index
55 SOURCE:GLOBALWEBINDEX (Q2 & Q3 2018). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
JAN E-COMMERCE SPEND BYCATEGORY
2019 THE TOTAL ANNUAL AMOUNT SPENT O N CONSUMER E-COMMERCE CATEGORIES, IN U.S. DOLLARS
TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE PENETRATION OF CONSUMER VALUE OF THE CONSUMER AVERAGE ANNUAL REVENUE
PURCHASING CONSUMER GOODS E-COMMERCE GOODS E-COMMERCE MARKET PER USER OF CONSUMER
GOODS VIAE-COMMERCE (TOTAL POPULATION) (TOTAL ANNUAL SALESREVENUE) GOODS E-COMMERCE(ARPU)
E-COMMERCE SPEND PER POINT-OF-SALE SPEND PER E-COMMERCE SPEND AS E-WALLETS’ SHARE OF E-WALLETS’ SHARE OF
CAPITA* IN U.S. DOLLARS CAPITA IN U.S.DOLLARS A SHARE OFRETAIL SPEND* E-COMMERCE SPEND POINT-OF-SALE SPEND
SOURCE: WORLDPAY GLOBAL PAYMENTS REPORT (NOVEMBER 2018); KEPIOS ANALYSIS. *NOTE: THE PER-CAPITA E-COMMERCE SPEND FIGURE QUOTED O N THIS CHART IS TAKEN FROM A
59 DIFFERENT SOURCE COMPARED TO THE E-COMMERCE ARPU FIGURES QUOTED ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT, SO FIGURES MAY NOT MATCH. RETAIL SPEND FIGURES ARE BASED O N COMBINED
E-COMMERCE AND POINT-OF-SALE SPEND, AS REPORTED BY WORLDPAY.
JAN CONNECTEDMONEY
2019 UNDERSTANDING INTERNET USERS’ ONLINE FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES
60 SOURCE:GLOBALWEBINDEX (Q2 & Q3 2018). FIGURES REPRESENT THE FINDINGS OF A BROAD SURVEY OF INTERNET USERS AGED 16-64.
MORE INFORMATION
61
NOTES ON DATASOURCES
POPULATION & DEMOGRAPHICS: United reported in Facebook’s self-serve advertising tools. SOCIAL MEDIA BEHAVIOURS: Time spent on
Nations World Population Prospects, 2017 Revision; Internet connection speed data from Ookla Speedtest social media from GlobalWebIndex (Q2 & Q3
US Census Bureau (accessed January 2019); United (December 2018). Time spent on the internet from 2018)*. Facebook reach and engagement datafrom
Nations World Urbanization Prospects, 2018 Revision. GlobalWebIndex (Q2 & Q3 2018)*. World’s top Locowise (Q4 2018).
websites from SimilarWeb (December 2018) and
LITERACYRATES:UNESCO Institute for Statistics; Alexa (30 days to 16 January 2019). Google search MOBILE USERS & CONNECTIONS: GSMA
UNICEF Data; World Bank DataBank;Pew Research; insights from Google Trends (data for full year 2018). Intelligence (January 2019); Ericsson Mobility Report
Ethnologue; IndexMundi; CIA World Factbook; Data on use of voice search and ad blockers from (November 2018); Ericsson Mobility Calculator and
Phrasebase (all accessed January 2019). GlobalWebIndex (Q2 & Q3 2018)*. Privacy concern Visualizer tools (accessed January 2019);
insights from Statista Global Consumer Survey 2018.
GDP & FINANCIAL INCLUSION DATA:World Content streaming insights from GlobalWebIndex MOBILE APPS: App Annie (January 2019);
Bank DataBank; IMF Data; CIA World Factbook (all (Q2 & Q3 2018)*. Internet use frequency data from SimilarWeb (January 2019).
accessed January 2019). Google Consumer Barometer (accessed January
2018). E-COMMERCE USERS & SPEND: Statista Digital
DEVICE USAGE: Google Consumer Barometer Market Outlook (e-Commerce, e-Travel, and digital
(accessed January 2018). Note that data has notbeen SOCIAL MEDIA USERS: Company earnings media industry reports) (accessed January 2019).
updated in the past 12 months. announcements; press releases; remarks by senior GlobalWebIndex (Q2 & Q3 2018)*; Worldpay
platform executives at public events; statements on Global Payments Report (November 2018).
INTERNETUSERS: InternetWorldStats; ITU Statistics; company websites; reports in reputable media. Top
World Bank DataBank; CIA WorldFactbook; Eurostat messenger platforms from SimilarWeb (December *METHODOLOGY NOTE: GlobalWebIndex
Data Explorer; Facebook’s self-serve advertising 2018). conducts a quarterly survey of a panel of 22 million
tools; Techrasa; MidEastMedia.org; local government internet users across 45 countries around the world,
authorities and telecom regulatory bodies; reports in SOCIAL MEDIA ADVERTISING AUDIENCES: data representing 90% of the world’s total internet users. For
reputable media (all accessed January 2019). Mobile extracted from each platform’s self-serve advertising full details of the company’s methodology, please visit
Internet share based on data from GlobalWebIndex tools (January 2019 and October 2018). Many data http://www.globalwebindex.com/
(Q2 & Q3 2018)*, and extrapolations of data points involve further extrapolations of this data.
NOTES ON DATAVARIANCE, MISMATCHES,ANDCURIOSITIES
This report uses data from a wide variety of Similarly, reports of internet user numbers It’s unlikely that one hundred percent of
sources, including market research agencies, vary considerably between different sources. internet users in any given country will use
internet and social media companies, In part, this is because there are fewer the same social media platform though, so in
governments and public bodies, news media, commercial imperatives for governments cases where internet and social media user
journalists, and our own internal analysis. and regulators to collect and publish regular numbers are the same, it’s likely that the actual
internet user data. However, the user numbers number of internet users will be higher than the
Wherever possible, we’ve prioritised data published by social media platforms can be number we’ve reported.
sources that provide broader geographical a useful proxy for the number of internet users
coverage, in order to minimise the potential in countries where no other reliable data are Lastly, a number of metrics that we reported in
variations between data points, and offer available, because all active social media last year’s Global Digital reports have been
more reliable comparison across countries. users must have an active internet connection revised by the original data provider since
However, where we believe that an individual in order to access social media. These data publication, and as a result, somefigures
metric provides a more reliable reference, are also more likely to be updated on a in this year’s reports may appear to have
we’ve used such individual numbers to ensure regular basis, as social media companies changed in unexpected ways. Wherever
the most accurate reporting. rely on this data to help sell their advertising we’re aware of these changes, we’ve included
products and services. details in the footnotes of each relevant chart,
Furthermore, due to differing data collection but please use caution when comparing data
and treatment methodologies used by these As a result, on occasion, we’ve used thelatest from different reports in case the original base
organisations, and the different sample addressable advertising audience data from has changed.
periods during which data were collected, social media platforms’ self-serve advertising
there may be significant differences in the tools to inform our internet user numbers, If you have any questions about specificdata
reported metrics for similar data points especially in less-developed economies, points in these reports, or if you’d like to offer
throughout this report. In particular, data where ‘official’ internet user numbers are your organisation’s data for consideration in
collected via surveys often vary from one published less frequently. Consequently, there future reports, please email our reports team:
report to another, even if those data were are a number of instances in this report where reports@kepios.com.
collected by the same organisation using the the reported number of social media users
same approach in each wave. equals the reported number of internet users.
DISCLAIMERAND IMPORTANTNOTES
This report has been compiled by Kepios Pte. This report contains data, tables, figures, anyone else for any direct, indirect, punitive,
Ltd. (“Kepios”), We Are Social Ltd. (“We Are maps, flags, analyses and technical notes incidental, special, consequential, exemplary
Social”) and Hootsuite Inc. (“Hootsuite”) that relate to various geographical territories or similar loss or damage, or loss or damage
for informational purposes only, and relies around the world, however reference to of any kind, suffered by you or anyone else
on data from a wide variety of sources, these territories and any associated elements as a result of any use, action or decisiontaken
including but not limited to public and private (including names and flags) does not imply by you or anyone else in any way connected
companies, market research firms, government the expression of any opinion whatsoever to this report or the information contained
agencies, NGOs, and privateindividuals. on the part of Kepios, We Are Social, herein, or the result(s) thereof, even if advised
Hootsuite, or any of the featured brands, of the possibility of such loss or damage.
While Kepios, We Are Social, andHootsuite nor any of those organisations’partners,
strive to ensure that all data and charts affiliates, employees or agents, concerning This report may contain references to third
contained in this report are, as at the time of the legal status of any country, territory, city parties, however this report does not endorse
publishing, accurate and up-to-date, neither or area or of its authorities, or concerning the any such third parties or theirproducts
Kepios, nor We Are Social, nor Hootsuite delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. This or services, nor is this report sponsored,
shall be responsible for any errors or report is provided with the understanding that endorsed or associated with such thirdparties.
omissions contained in this report, or for the it does not constitute professional advice or
results obtained from its use. services of any kind and should therefore not Except for those portions of this report relating
be substituted for independent investigations, to the perspectives of Hootsuite or We Are
All information contained in this report thought or judgment. Social, this report and any opinions contained
is provided “as is”, with no guarantee herein have been prepared by Kepios,
whatsoever of its accuracy, completeness, Accordingly, neither Kepios, nor We Are and have not been specifically approved
correctness or non-infringement of third- Social, nor Hootsuite, nor any of the brands or or disapproved by Hootsuite. This report is
party rights and without warranty of any organisations featured or cited herein, nor any subject to change without notice. To ensure
kind, express or implied, including without of their partners, affiliates, group companies, that you have the most up-to-date version of
limitation, warranties of merchantability or employees or agents shall, to the fullest this report, please visit our reports website at
fitness for any particular purpose. extent permitted by law, be liable to you or https://datareportal.com.
We are a socially-ledcreative agency.
We are a global team of more than 750 people with a common
purpose: to connect people and brands in meaningful ways.
We believe in people before platforms and the power of
social insight to drive business value. We call this social thinking.
We already work with many of the world’s top brands,
including adidas, Netflix, Samsung, Lavazza, and Google.
If you’d like to work with us, visit https://wearesocial.com
Hootsuite is the leader in social media management.
With our expertise, best-in-breed partnerships, and scale,
we’ll help your organization succeed withsocial.
Explore how our solution can help:https://hootsuite.com