Professional Documents
Culture Documents
4. Mathews v. Williams, Brown & Co.[10 TLR (1894) 386] (Paget’s view on ‘customer’]
6. Dena Bank v. Prabhudas Parekh & Co. [(2000) 1BC 651] (Priorities of Govt. debt]
8. Jwala Bank Ltd. v. Shitla Prasad Singh [(1950) 20 com Cases 239] (Banking Companies)
9. N.M. Veerappa v. Canara Bank(AIR 1998 SC 1101) (Sec. 21-A OF BR Act & CPC)
10.RBI Vs. Jayantilal N. Mistry [(2016) 133 SCL 447/ (2015) 64 taxmann.com 267 (SC)] (RBI duty
bound under RTI)
`
1. Mardia Chemicals Ltd. Vs. UOI [(2004) 4 SCC 311](SARFAESI Act was challenged)
2. Allahabad Bank v. Canara Bank (2000) 101 Comp. Cas. 64 (SC) (RDB Act overrides the
Companies Act in view of S. 34)
3. Bar Association v. UOI (AIR 1995 Del 323) (RDB Act was challenged)
4. Nahar Industrial Enterprises Ltd. v. Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation (2009) 3 BC
539 (SC)(remanded suits under Sec. 18 of the DRT Act)
5. Sajjan Bank v. Reserve Bank of India, AIR 1961Mad. 8 (Control of banking system by RBI)
6. Baleshvar Dayal Jaiswal v. Bank of India and others, 2015(8) TMI 1165 Supreme Court.
(Appellate Court under SAFAESI Act, has the power to condon delay in filling an appeal u/s. 18(1).
Latest Cases
7. Madras Petrochem Ltd & Another Vs. BIFR & Others [(2016) 2 Comp LJ 206 (SC)] (Conflict
between RDDB Act & SARFAESI Act)
8. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd Vs. Megnostar Telecommunications (P) Ltd & Another
AND
Mohan Tractors (P) Ltd Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd [(2016) 2 COMP LJ 294(DEL)]
(enforcement of security interest)
9. Pegasus Assets Reconstruction (P) Ltd Vs. Haryana Concast Ltd and another [(2016) 2 COMP
LJ 273 (SC)] (enforcement of security interest)
10. MRB Roadconst. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Rupee Co-op. Bank Ltd [2016 (3) TMI 382 (Bom)](‘Amount of the
debt due’)
11. Bhupinder Singh Sodhi Vs. UOI [(2016)133 SCL 101/(2015) 62 TAXMANN.COM
95](SARFAESI Act not Enforceable in J&K )
12. Dr K. Venkatesh Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Hyderabad [(2016) 133 SCL 439/65 taxmann.com
144 (Andhra Pradesh)] (Lessee not entitled to notice.
13. SEBI v. Pan Asia Advisors Ltd. (2016) 134 SCL 311 ( SEBI Jurisdiction)
(fraud definition)
4. Bhola Nath Rora v. State of Delhi (1982 Cri LJ 1485) ( Dishonouring cheque alone may or may not
mean cheating)
5. Tanjore Permanent Bank Ltd. v. S.R. Rangachari (AIR 1959 Mad 119) (forged cheques encashed –
bank’s responsibility)
6. Magan Behari Lal v. State of Punjab (AIR 1977 SC 1091) (expert opinion on handwriting must be
accepted with caution)
7. Dhancomal Parsaran v. Kuppuraj (AIR 1977 Mad 274) (Material alteration should be substantial)
8. Joydeb Das v. National Bank of India Ltd. (65 CWN 282) (when bank not liable to pay on material
alterations)
9. Vijay Kumar Bindra v. State (1975 CLR 224) (Offence u/ s. 489-C IPC)
10. Dhan Laxmi v. Prasanna Kumari (AIR 1990 SC 494)(Cognizance in Bank Frauds)
Latest Cases
12. Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra (2014) 3 Comp LJ 414 (SC) (territorial
jurisdiction under NI Act)
13. Punjab National Bank v. Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. (2016) 133SCL317( Power of RBI to give
directions under sec. 35 A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 )
English Cases
7. Griffith v. Flemming and others [1909] 1 K.B. 805 ( Insurable interest in Life insurance)
Indian Cases
9.Smt. Krishna Wati Puri v. LIC of India AIR 1975 Delhi 19( Non disclosure of heart disease is a
material fact)
10.Manohal Lal v. LIC of India AIR 1981 Del. 171( Material Fact i.e., UBERRIMA FIDES)
11.Rati Lal & comp. v. National Security Insurance comp. Ltd. AIR 1964 SC 1896 ( Importance of
Cover Note)
12. Rajendra Kumari v. Shanta Trivedi,(1989) 2 SCC 140. (Notional Future earnings)
13. New India Insurance comp. v. Mandar Madhav Tambe,(1996) 2SCC 321(Motor Vehicle
Insurance)
14.National Insurance comp. v. Seema Malhotra (2001) 3SCC 151. (Motor Vehicle Insurance)
15. Hanil Era Textile ltd. V. Oriental Insurance Comp. (2001) 1 SCC 269 ( Fire Insurance)
16. Oberai Forwarding Agency Ltd. V. New India Insurance Comp. Ltd. (2000) 2 SCC 407(Fire
Insurance)
Latest Cases
17. Rakesh Kumar & Etc. Vs. United India Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors. Etc. 2016 Civil Appeal Nos.
6199-6202.