APLO Mapping Form

Project Title:
Supervisor:
Relevant Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs):
The project is designed so that students will achieve the following PLOs:
1 Engineering Knowledge 7 Environment and Sustainability
2 Problem Analysis 8 Ethics
3 Design/Development of Solutions 9 Individual and Team Work
4 Investigation 10 Communication
5 Modern Tool Usage 11 Project Management
6 The Engineer and Society 12 Lifelong Learning

Justification of the Project as Complex Engineering Problem:

Which of the following attributes of Complex Engineering Problem are applicable
1 Wide range/conflicting issues
2 Depth of analysis
3 Depth of knowledge
4 Infrequently encountered issues
5 Standard codes
6 Involvement of stake holders with diverse needs
7 Significant consequences/influence in a range of contexts
8 Combination of Problems and sub-problems (interdependence)

Complex Engineering Problem Solving Activities Low Medium High

1 Range of resources required
2 Interaction level
3 Innovation level

4 Consequences to society and environment

Familiarity (Ability to apply acquired
5
knowledge)
 Annex 3.9: Project Detailed plan
Sessi

Session: (2018 - 2022) Semester: (  Fall  Spring) Date: / /

Department
Project Title
Supervisor(s)
Student Names

Week Number
Sr. No.

Project Phase or Task Supervisor(s)

Responsible

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
guiding this
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
student(s)
task

Student
Signatures
(respectively)
Supervisor(s)
Approval
 Annex 3.10: Project Title & Explanation

Project Title

Prepared By:
Supervised by: Date

Objectives:
Summarize the objectives of the project
1. Objective one
2. Objective two

Description:
In this part, describe the main part of the
project in which you can summarize the
design method or experimental work
that helped you reaching the final
product of the project.

Results and conclusions:

Summarize the important results and

recommendations of the project.

Put the most main figures that summarize the work:

 Annex 3.7: FYP Weekly Meeting Report

Session: (2018 - 2022) Semester: (  Fall  Spring)

Department
Project Title
Supervisor(s)
Students attended the
meeting
Meeting No. Meeting Date
PART I
Meeting Outcomes, Recommendations and Decisions:
Subject Outcomes/Recommendations/ Decisions Responsibility Timing / Comments
1

Student Signatures
(respectively)
PART II
Students Performance Measure
(This part is to be used by the supervisors to keep continual evaluation of the FYP students)
Scoring system: 0 = Not exist/acceptable, 1 = Weak, 2 = Acceptable, and 3 = Good 4=
Excellent
Performs tasks Performs tasks Functions
Attendance and
Student Roll No.s in the planned in acceptable effectively in
punctuality
time quality team

Supervisor Approval
Date:
Name: Signature:
 9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1

13
12
11
10

Sum
Week

Average
Report No.
Department
Project Title
Supervisor(s)
Attendance and

Total Score=30
punctuality

Roll No.
Performs tasks in

Session: (2018 - 2022)

the planned time

/
Performs tasks in
acceptable quality

……….…… ……….……
Functions effectively

Scoring system:
in team
Attendance and

3 = Good
punctuality

Roll No.
Performs tasks in
the planned time

/
Semester: (  Fall

Performs tasks in
acceptable quality

……….…… ……….……
Functions effectively
(Form A)

Covered Duration

in team
0 = Not exist/acceptable,

Attendance and
punctuality
 Spring)

4=Excellent.

Performs tasks in
Roll No.

the planned time

/
Interim Assessment Report

1 = Weak,

Performs tasks in
From:

acceptable quality

……….…… ……….……
/

Functions effectively
in team
/

Attendance and
punctuality
Performs tasks in
Roll No.
2 = Acceptable,
To

the planned time

/
Performs tasks in
/

acceptable quality
/

……….…… ……….……
Functions effectively
in team
 Annex 3.11: Final Year Project Evaluation Rubrics
(Form B)
Final Year Project Evaluation Rubrics
(A) Oral Communication (Communication)

Session: (2018 - 2022) Semester: (  Fall  Spring)

Department Department of Mechanical Engineering
Project Title
Supervisor(s)
Student Roll No.s
Student 1 Student 2
Student 3 Student 4
Total Scores=30
Rubrics: 0.5 = Very Weak, 1= Weak 1.5 = Acceptable, and 2 = Satisfactory
3=Good 4= Excellent
(I) Presentation Material (team assessment) (15/30)

No. Item to be checked PLOs Score

Presentation material is well organized from technical writing point of view (Sandwich 10
1
format: Title slide, Introduction, Main body with different sections and Conclusion)
2 Overall appearance, presentation style and readability 10
3 Main ideas are presented logically, Objectively and clearly. 10
The presentation demonstrates the students, ability to present work in team in an 9
4
integrated and continual manner.
Sub-Total (I)

(II) Individual Assessment for Students (15/30)

No. Item to be checked PLOs

11
5 Student’s time management

Seldom returning to notes/reports, ability to 10

6
explain idea and eye-contact
Clear voice and confidence of the student in 10
7
presentation (in English)
Student’s ability to handle questions and 10
8
discussions (in English)
Sub-Total (II)

Student
Mark (Sub-Total (1)+ Sub-Total (2)
Modified mark out of 30
 Project (Report and Final Product) Evaluation Checklist
(Form C)

Session: (2018 - 2022) Semester: (  Fall  Spring)

Department: Mechanical Engineering

Project Title:

Supervisor(s):

Student Names
with Regd Nos:

I) Submission Time; Planned Date: / / Actual Date: / /

 On time
No of marks to be
 Late for ….... days (in this case 2 marks are reduced from the total mark reduced
for the first day of lateness and Afterwards extra reduction with a rate of 1 mark/day
A=
is applied)

(III) Evaluation of the Written Report Formality, Style and Quality of Technical Writing
(Communication, Project Management)

Total Scores=20
Rubrics: 0.5 = Very Weak, 1= Weak 1.5 = Acceptable, and 2 = Satisfactory
3=Good 4= Excellent
No. Item to be checked PLO Score
Report Organization (Cover page, Acknowledgement, Table of contents, List of
1 figures, List of tables, Nomenclature, Introducing chapter, Main body chapters, Chapter 12
for conclusions and recommendations, References, and Appendices)
2 Report Style (fonts, titles, page numbers, header and footers, margins …etc) 10

3 Main Body Organization (sections, sub-sections, numbering, etc). 10

4 Figures and Tables citations (i.e. all figures and tables have numbers and captions, and 10
are mentioned in the text before they placed
5 Graphs Quality (Size, Axes, Labels, and Legend) 5
6 Mathematical equations (clarity and explanation of the equations) 10
7 English Language Quality (paragraphs, relations between sentences, using punctuations,
10
grammar, and spell check.
8 References are cited in the text and written in standard format. 12
Obtained Marks
 Form D)
Evaluation of the thesis Approach and Final Product - (Final Product: Physical system,
new design, Software, Methodology to be applied … etc)

Total Scores=20
Rubrics: 0.5 = Very Weak, 1= Weak 1.5 = Acceptable, and 2 = Satisfactory
3=Good 4= Excellent
No PLO
. Item to be checked PLOs Score
No.
Quality of the introduction and the Review for available data, Engineering
1 Knowledge 1
products and works.
Problem description and project objectives (Report should 2
clearly identify the project purpose besides the problem
2 Problem Analysis
statement/formulation, reality, creativity and its direct impact to the
environment, economy and society).
Brain storming, ideas generation and deciding the course of 5
design using the modern tool (Report should demonstrate the
3 different ideas and design alternatives and apply appropriate Modern tools
techniques, modern engineering and IT tool raised to solve the
problem and justify the selected approach for design)
Design inputs, assumptions, heuristics, technical constraints and 3
4 Design/Development
other constraints
reasoning informed by 4
Design process/approach is logic, free from technical or logic
5 contextual knowledge/
errors and answer all how and why questions. Investigation
Design outputs (drawings, material data sheet, instructions, 3
6 Design/Development
software, programs, etc.) are existed and satisfactory.
Existence of the Project final product and its applicability for 3
7 Design/Development
use/operate
Verification that the final product is complete and met the design 4
8 Investigation
inputs and the purpose of the project
The final product is evaluated and justified against all applicable Engineer and society, 6,7,8
9 constraints (technical, environmental, social, economical, ethical, Environment and
health and safety) Sustainability
Conclusions and recommendations are addressed based on the 12
analysis and deep discussions for the final product -AND/OR-
10 based on the analysis and discussions for results obtained from (or Lifelong Learning
performance of) the final product. Conclusion quality is also
considered.
11 Gantt Chart of project activities are properly laid down Project management 11

Description of the tasks accomplished by individual members Individual and

9
12 teamwork
and the team separately.
13 Level of plagiarism is low Ethics 8

Obtained Marks
Maximum Marks
 Final Marks for the Project (Oral Presentation, Report, Approach and Product and Portfolio)

Evaluator Name

Evaluator Signature Final Marks

Date