Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
Two hundred patients were enrolled in a randomized, prospective
clinical trial comparing the use of 10-0 nylon, 10-0 polypropylene
(ProIene-), 11.0 poly~ster (Mersilene-), and 10-0 polyethylene
(Noviifile ) sutUre materials on the amount and decay curves of sur-
. gicaUY.'indllced astigmatism following intraocular lens (IOL) sur-
gery~ Patients with Mersilene and nylon sutures had the highest
ll"'Olltl~ of induced with-the-rule (WTR) cylinder (significantly
more than Prorene} at one day after surgery. However, the WTR
cylinder decayed rapidly for nylon during the first three months hut
more slowly for Mersilene because of its lack ofstretchahility. The
Prolene group had the lowest level ofinduced WTR cylinder at one
day, bi1tapinst~the~rule (ATR) drift occurred, .(eaving cases with
ATRastigmatism by a year. The nylon group had the second highest
alllsunt ofinduced WTR cylinder at one day, which had decayed to
'ATBcYliDderhyJ.1ve monthS. Between one and two years postop-
eratively, the nylon group experienced asignificant ATR shift. The
,'aIllonnt:ofearlyinducedWTR cylinder seemed to he related to the
knoHying technique and tissue gripping characteristics, whereas
.t heshapeofthe deCl,lY curve was related to the material character-
istics of the'suture.
For approximately ten years, we have used 10-0 lene, 10-0 Novafil, and 10-0 nylon sutures follow-
polypropylene (Prolene ill) sutures routinely at the ing phacoemulsification with insertion of a
Gimbel Eye Centre. Prolene does not hydrolyze posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) to deter-
and break as nylon has a tendency to do. The ma- mine if there were significant group differences in
jority of surgeons, however, use 10-0 nylon su- surgically induced cylinder and visual rehabilita-
tures. Polyester (Mersilene®) is also used and, more tion time.
recently, the synthetic substance polyethylene
(N ovafil®). All suture materials have differing char- MATERIALS AND METHODS
acteristics and elasticity. Nylon is generally the
most stretchable suture, Mersilene does not stretch Two hundred patients were enrolled in a pro-
much, while Prolene and Novafil have similar han- spective, four-group study comparing the use of
dling characteristics. 10-0 Prolene, 11-0 Mersilene, 10-0 Novafil, and
We conducted a prospective, four-group study 10-0 nylon sutures following phacoemulsification
comparing the use of 10-0 Prolene, 11-0 Mersi- with insertion of a posterior chamber IOL. Patients
From the Gimbel Eye Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, and the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois at Chicago .
Analysis of the data was performed by the Center for Clinical Research, University of Illinois at Chicago.
Reprint requests to Howard Gimbel, M.D. , Gimbel Eye Centre, Suite 450, 4935-40th Avenue N. W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada
T3A 2Nl.
M 2.5
E
A ~ PROLENE -+- MERSILENE -+- NOVAFIL -a- NYLON
N
2
p
o
S
T 1.5
o Fig. 1. (Gimbel) Line graphs of mean
preoperative and postopera-
P tive cylinders over time for
c each suture material group.
y
L
I 0.5
N
~ I
J''"'1'''S--r
TIME ,
R 2'3-'S.--------1'Y-R---···----·. 2 YR
PREOP D W MM M
Postoperative
Period Prolene Mersilene Novafil Nylon
1 day· N = 52 N= 48 N = 50 N = 50
Mean (SO) 1.09 (0.72) 1.85 (1.58) 1.45 (0.93) 1.74 (1.44)
2-3 weekst N = 51 N = 46 N = 48 N = 47
Mean (SO) 0.85 (0.81) 1.32 (1.05) 1.04 (0.68) 1.05 (0.70)
2 monthst N = 51 N = 41 N = 47 N = 49
Mean (SO) 0.81 (0.53) 1.27 (1.23) 0.88 (0.57) 0.90 (0.72)
3 months N = 46 N = 37 N = 38 N = 44
Mean (SO) 0.80 (0.44) 1.06 (1.02) 0.97 (0.49) 0.91 (0.53)
5-6 months N = 31 N = 25 N = 39 N = 38
Mean (SO) 0.89 (0.50) 0.80 (0.81) 0.94 (0.65) 0.79 (0.49)
1 year N = 38 N = 43 N = 45 N = 43
Mean (SO) 0.88 (0.52) 1.10 (0.87) 0.86 (0.57) 0.76 (0.48)
2 year N = 26 N = 26 N = 25 N = 27
Mean (SO) 1.23 (0.67) 0.97 (0.58) 0.92 (0.64) 1.27 (0.65)
Significant differences:
• Prolene and Mersilene, Prolene and nylon P < .01
t Prolene and Mersilene P = .05
t Prolene and Mersilene P = .03
groups. Mersilene and nylon had the largest months and one year, mean ATR shift for this group
amounts of induced WTR cylinder at one day. Sig- was -1.07 D, with 43% of cases having> 1.0 D of
nificant decay occurred during the first three ATR shift. However, between one and two years,
months and continued at a slower rate through one mean shift was +0.09 D (WTR direction) and only
year. After one year, the Mersilene group had no 8% of cases had ATR cylinder axis shifts> 1 D
significant decay in either direction. Between two (Figure 4).
0.5
WTR
Fig. 3. (Gimbel) Line graph of mean
ATR 0~:===5=~~
I "
Cravy-calculated induced as-
tigmatism depicting WTR cyl-
-0.5 inder decay over time for each
suture material group.
-1
TIME
-1.5~r-.-.---.-------------.----------------------.
1 3 2 3 5 1 VR 2 VR
o W M M M
The pattern ofWTR cylinder decay was different lized. Between one and two years, 16% of cases had
in the nylon group. Mean ATR shift between two ATR drift> 1.0 D (Figure 4).
months and one year was -0.47 D, with 21 % of Although 1.45 D of total induced cylinder had
cases shifting in the ATR direction by more than been induced in the Novafil group at one day
one diopter. Between one and two years, the mean (Figure 2), it was almost evenly split between WTR
ATR shift was -0.6 D and 32 % of nylon cases had and ATR, resulting in less than 0.5 D of mean WTR
ATR shifts greater than 1.0 D, showing that, unlike cylinder for this group at one day (Figure 3). By
Mersilene, much of the overall ATR drift in the two months, the proportions ofWTR and ATR cyl-
nylon group occurred after one year. inder for these cases were similar. Through one
The Prolene group also had a significant mean year, there was no large preponderance of either
decrease in WTR cylinder (0.8 D) during the first WTR or ATR cylinder shifts in this group; however,
three months (Figure 3), but this leveled off be- between one and two years, 17% of cases did have
tween three and six months. Since so little > 1.0 D of ATR shift.
« 0.5 D) WTR was induced at one day, by six To assess whether data indicating late shifts in
months these cases had mean ATR cylinder of over axis from one to two years were affected by patient
half a diopter. After six months, the decay stabi- attrition between one and two years (see Table 1),
the data were analyzed by the Cravy method using
only cases that were examined at one day, two
months, three months, one year, and two years.
The pattern of late ATR drift was the same
(Figure 5).
Table 4 shows the percentage of cases with un-
aided visual acuities of 20/40 or better preopera-
tively and at the various postoperative visits.
The unaided visual results were comparable,
with no statistically significant differences
among suture types at any period. The percent-
age of cases with 20/40 or better acuity at one
day after surgery was 40% to 62%. By two
WTR ATR months, 74% to 81 % had acuities of 20/40 or bet-
ter. Twenty-nine percent to 42% had acuities of
Fig. 4. (Gimbel) Bar charts of percent of cases with> 1 D of 20/25 or better. This level of visual acuity was
ATR cylinder shifts between one year and two years maintained through one year. At two years, 68% to
for each suture material group. 81 % of the cases that returned had unaided visual
I
1.5
N
D -+- MERSILENE -+- NOVAFIL -B- NYLON
U
C
Fig. 5 . (Gimbel) Line graph of mean E
Cravy-calculated induced as- D 0.5
tigmatism depicting WTR cyl-
inder decay over time for each A
suture material group. Cases S 0
were examined at the one day, T
two week , two month, three I
month, one year, and two year -0 .5
visits.
G
M
A - 1
T
I TIME
S -1.5
M 1 3 2 3 1 VR 2 VR
D W MM
Postoperative
Period Prolene Mersilene Novafil Nylon
1 day
20/15-20/25 11 (21 %) 7 (16%) 8 (16%) 5 (10%)
20/30-20/40 17 (33%) 19 (42%) 12 (24%) 26 (52%)
2-3 weeks
20/15-20/25 11 (22%) 10 (23%) 17 (36%) 13 (28%)
20/30-20/40 25 (51 %) 18 (41%) 20 (43%) 21 (44%)
2 months
20/15-20/25 20 (38%) 18 (42%) 18 (38%) 14 (29%)
20/30-20/40 21 (41 %) 15 (34%) 17 (36%) 25 (52%)
3 months
20/15-20/25 15 (33%) 14 (38%) 15 (38%) 14 (33%)
20/30-20/40 19 (41 %) 16 (43%) 13 (32%) 19 (46%)
5-6 months
20/15-20/25 10 (30%) 12 (44%) 17 (46%) 14 (38%)
20/30-20/40 13 (39%) 7 (26%) 15 (40%) 15 (40%)
1 year
20/15-20/25 16 (41 %) 17 (46%) 11 (30%) 17 (44%)
20/30-20/40 17 (44%) 10 (27%) 18 (49%) 10 (26%)
2 years
20/1.5-20/25 9 (33%) 9 (35%) 10 (43%) 8 (32%)
20/30-20/40 12 (44%) 12 (46%) 6 (26%) 9 (36%)
When pulled tightly it induces a high level ofWTR able differences in knot-tying technique. The
cylinder. It then holds tightly because of its lack of amount of early induced WTR cylinder is believed
stretchability, maintaining a higher level of WTR to be related to the knot-tying technique (in turn,
cylinder over time than do other suture types. This due to the handling characteristics) and to tissue
was the pattern we observed. Even though the de- gripping characteristics (ease of sliding through tis-
cay rate was slower, eventually the level of induced sue). The shape of the decay curve, however, is
cylinder came down, with levels comparable to the related to the material characteristics of the suture.
other suture types by a year. The manufacturer had This study, carried out over 21/2 years, resulted
recommended the use of 11-0 rather than 10-0 in absolute levels of surgically induced cylinder,
suture based on the belief that 11-0 Mersilene was which reflected the incision techniques used at the
equivalent in strength to 10-0 nylon. This thinner time. The surgeon's (H.V.C.) incision technique is
suture probably "cheese-wires," cutting through currently very different. Nevertheless, the relative
tissue to release the tension. differences among suture materials do apply to cur-
One author (H.V.C.) had no previous clinical rent techniques.
experience with Novafil and included it in the In general, we are concerned with apposing the
study for completeness. The rapid decay of in- external aspect of the wound with sutures and have
duced WTR astigmatism in the Novafil group may not been concerned with the internal aspect. Not
relate to the stretchability of that material, which all patients develop ATR drift, even in groups in
quickly forgives an overtight adjustment of the su- which the means clearly shift in that direction. Per-
ture. Prolene and nylon seem to fall midway be- haps cases in which the internal aspect of the
tween Mersilene and N ovafil in this regard. wound is well apposed are the ones that do not
In retrospect, the two weaknesses of the com- demonstrate the ATR drift. If this is true, there may
parability of groups in the study were the use of be aqueous access to the large portion of the inci-
11-0 rather than 10-0 Mersilene and the unavoid- sion in cases in which the internal corneal aspect of
REFERENCES
l. Conceptual Software, Inc. Professional Database Analysis Sys-
tem (PRODAS) Reference Manual, Version 3.0, Houston,
1985
2. Naylor EJ. Astigmatic difference in refractive error. Br J Oph-
thalmol1968; 52:422-424
3. Cravy TV. Calculation of the change in corneal astigmatism
following cataract extraction. Ophthalmic Surg 1979; 10:
38-49
4. Jaffe NS, Clayman HM. The pathophysiology of corneal astig-
matism after cataract extraction. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol
Otolaryngol1975; 79:615-630
5. Neumann A, McCarty G, Sanders D, Raanan M. Small incisions
to control astigmatism during cataract surgery. J Cataract Re-
fract Surg 1989; 15:78-84
Fig. 6. (Gimbel) Aqueous access to inner aspect of incision 6. Thornton SP, Sanders DR. Graded nonintersecting transverse
may cause permanent gaping and, therefore, late incisions for correction of idiopathic astigmatism. J Cataract
ATR. Refract Surg 1987; 13:27-31
7. Neumann A, McCarty G, Sanders D, Raanan M. Refractive
evaluation of astigmatic keratotomy procedures. J Cataract
Refract Surg 1989; 15:25-31
the incision is not apposed. This could cause per- 8. Cravy TV. Long-term corneal astigmatism related to selected
manent gaping, wound slippage, and late ATR elastic, monofilament, nonabsorbable sutures. J Cataract Re-
drift. If this hypothesis is correct, then self-sealing fract Surg 1989; 15:61-69