Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name of Study
coordinator**: Not Applicable
Nama Koordinator Kajian**:
Page 1 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Does the research require an external Research Ethics Committee approval? (e.g.
MREC)
Adakah penyelidikan ini memerlukan kelulusan Jawatankuasa Etika Penyelidikan Luaran? (contoh
MREC)
Page 2 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Part B1
Bahagian B1
Interviews Case study
Temubual Kajian kes
Part B2
Bahagian B2
1. Background:
Latar belakang:
The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has created a new and challenging way of
life across the world. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the COVID-19
virus as a public enemy number one that has gone pandemic and encouraged the
nations to put measures in place to curb the spread of the disease (Jiang & Wen, 2020).
COVID-19 is affecting everyone, yet employees are encouraged to continue working;
some on the frontline fighting the virus and some working from home. The WHO
emphasized on social distancing. Hence no health and food workers are forced to
practice virtual working if their jobs permit. The COVID-19 virus has proven to be
extremely dangerous to human beings, and some with weaker immune systems are
losing their lives. Many people have been infected with COVID-19. Therefore, it is
essential to understand how the affected employees, who are still working dealing with
stress, ensure work life balance and remain committed to their organization during this
COVID-19 virus shutdown.
The Sarawak Government through the State Disaster Management Committee or SDMC
took early stringent measures to break the transmission of COVID-19. Together with the
Page 3 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
relevant authorities and agencies, they continue to anticipate and plan critical strategic
responses to the developing situation in both managing the outbreak and its impact
including safeguarding the welfare and well-being of the less well-off. To ensure that the
containment efforts are successful and the sacrifices of the many over these past
months have not been in vain, everyone in Sacofa Sdn Bhd (Sacofa) is to continue to
cooperate and comply with all directives and to adapt to the new normal while
maintaining the physical and mental health. Sacofa has had to make many changes in
the way they work. Some of these work practices include greater use of the collaborative
tools for those working from home and the implementation of stronger social distancing
guidelines at work.
Sacofa has implementing the new work arrangement (NWA) during movement control
order (MCO). The NWA will minimize the number of staff required to be in the office at
any one time to make everyone safer from potential COVID-19 exposure. Thus, the staff
will be work from home (WFH) and also split team working (STW) for shifts staff. While
NWA has been effective in ensuring Sacofa’s business continuity while reducing the risk
of transmission of COVID-19, there have also been many challenges in adapting to their
new routines for both work and personal commitments, leading to higher stress levels.
Therefore, this study investigates on connection between the organization commitment
of employees with work-life balance and perceived stress in Sacofa Sdn Bhd, Kuching,
during this Covid-19 Pandemic.
In 2020, stress at the workplace reached a new level that was never seen before. Our
working life was undergoing the COVID-19 pandemic and its consequences (Marinaki,
2020). A study conducted by (Ruzungunde, Murugan, & Hlayywayo, 2016) examined
that there is a relationship between job stress and organizational commitment
components. Cicei (2012) study on the Romanian public service observed medium and
high levels of stress and low and medium levels of organizational commitment. With
reference to the study conducted by Cicei (2012), it indicates that high level of stress can
lead to low organizational commitment, which can contribute to voluntarily employee
turnover and may lead to low overall firm’s performance. In the study carried out by (Ates
& Ihtiyaroglu, 2019) they quoted the works carried out by Gul et al (2008) which
examined that there is a very weak negative relationship between stress and
organizational commitment.
Page 4 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
affect the organizational commitment. Based on the study conducted by (Putra &
Suwanda, 2019), there is positive relationship between turnover and job stress that
contradict the organizational commitment concept. The connection amid stress and
organizational commitment has been assessed, establishing a strong negative
relationship in affective commitment, normative commitment and continuance
commitment (Zehra, 2017).
Work - life balance aims at happiness and successful working in the workplace and
family realm by preventing conflict of roles (Clark, 2000). In the past, the balance of work
life was designed to the extent that an individual is equal in his role as a worker and also
in the role of his family. For many people the problem is how they navigate all the
conflicting job and life demands and prevent the detrimental effects of work in their
individual lives. Research has shown that employees who think they have little time to
live in a personal atmosphere feel exhausted and disturbed during their jobs.
Furthermore, the negative side of working in the personal life of an employee can result
in job fatigue, interferes with family and friends, loss of fun and increased stress
(Meenakshi, V., & Ravichandran, 2013).
Problem statement:
Penyataan masalah:
A significant global public health crisis marked the beginning of 2020. Social distancing
has been introduced as one potential measure to prevent people from getting infected by
others (Bhumika, 2020). In compliance with the mandate of the government, few
industries asked their employees to work from home (WFH) during this Movement
Control Order (MCO) period. Some workers use WFH to help maintain harmony
between work and life, which also known as work-life balance (WLB). However,
managers are becoming skeptical as it could shy away from delegated tasks while at
home (Bloom, Liang, Roberts, & Ying, 2015).
The Consumer’s Association of Penang (CAP) has expressed concern regarding the
impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the mental health of citizens, as suicide cases have
risen since the beginning of the Movement Control Order (MCO) in March 2020
(Dermawan, 2020). Fear, worry and anxiety will cause depression and ultimately lead to
suicidal thoughts, as was the case with a 62-year old patient who committed suicide at
Serdang Hospital, Selangor. The general feeling of helplessness in dealing with job
losses, reduced incomes, debts incurred or someone in the family dying from illness are
Page 5 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
some of the causes, as there is a continuing uncertainty when the pandemic ends. Many
Malaysians have lost their income or are out of work. Losing a job disrupts one's mental
health, creating a range of feelings, including depression and anxiety (Kaur, 2020).
Employees are the main source of an organization (Abdul Rahman, 2020). (Agrawal,
2001) indicated that work stress is not recent, particularly in this pandemic, it is not
something that we just heard. However, stress also causes havoc in the work, for
instance stress management in the performance of the employees. The pandemic has
caused many stressful situations in the labour market during the pandemic, both for front
liners and people involved in the production of essential goods, delivery and transport
and ensures the safety and security of the population (ILO, 2020). People at home are
often vulnerable to certain psychosocial threats, such as loneliness, work-to-family limits
and increased risk.
Imbalances in work life can lead to the employees’ failure to commit, as they do not align
their work with their roles at home. Employee’s commitment is important to achieve
corporate effectiveness (Azeez, 2017). Organization which seek optimum performance
from employees must not take it lightly on their employees work life balance. This is
because employees have different roles to play, both at work and at home, and must
manage those roles effectively to prevent stress for employees. Commitment is seen as
a key determinant of the organization’s success. The importance of commitment arises
from the fact that it supports organizations, especially during this pandemic, with the
need to retain more employees and thus increase achievement, productivity and
efficiency. No organization will then work at high standards unless each employee is
committed to the goals of the company and is a successful member of the team (Shahid
& Azhar, 2013).
Page 6 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
References:
Rujukan:
A. Aydin, Y. S., & Uysal, S. (2011). “The effect of gender on organizational commitment
of on organizational commitment of teacher: a meta analytic analysis .
Educational Sciences : Theory & Practice , 628-632.
Aruldoss, A. (2020). The relationship between quality of work life and work libe balance
mediating role of job stress, job satisfaction and job commitment: evidence from
India. Emerald Insight, 1-27.
Ates, O. T., & Ihtiyaroglu, N. (2019). Analysis of the Relationship Between Stress and
Organizational Commitment in Employees: A Meta-Analysis Study. Education
and Training Studies, 94-106.
Bhatti, M. H., Bhatti, M. H., Akram, M. U., Hashim, M., & Akram, Z. (2016). Relationship
Page 7 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Bhumika. (2020). Challenges for work–life balance during COVID-19 induced nationwide
lockdown: exploring gender difference in emotional exhaustion in the Indian
setting. Emerald Insight, 705-718.
Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). DOES WORKING FROM HOME
WORK? EVIDENCE FROM A CHINESE EXPERIMENT. Oxford Journals, 165-
218.
Borghei, R., Jandaghi, G., Matin, H. Z., & Dastani, N. (2010). An examination of the
relationship between. International Journal of Human Sciences , 1155-1171.
Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self concept. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 538-549.
Campbell, W., & Foster, J. (2006). “Self-esteem: evolutionary roots and the historical
cultivation", in Kernis, M.H. (Ed), Self-Esteem and Answers: A Sourcebook of
Current Perspectives. Psychology Press, 340-346.
Carver, C. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider
the Brief Cope. Research Gate, 92-100.
Cast, A. D., & Burke, P. J. (2002). A Theory of Self-Esteem. Research Gate, 1041-1068.
Chraif, M., & Anitei, M. (2011). The impact of economic crisis on occupational stress and
counterproductive behavior in a food and beverage restaurant chain. Science
Direct, 2644-2650.
Page 8 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Cohen, S., & Deverts, D. J. (2012). Who's stressed? Distributions of psychological stress
in the United States in probability samples from 1983, 2006 and 2009. Applied
Social Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.midss.org/content/perceived-
stress-scale-pss
Dermawan, A. (2020, Dec 7). New Straits Times. Retrieved from New Straits Times:
https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2020/12/647524/cap-covid-19-pandemic-
psychological-time-bomb
Despande, D. A., Salunke, P., & Joshi, T. (2020). Work Life Balance In Phase Of
Pandemic. 13.
Elloy, D., & Patil, V. (2012). Exploring the relationship between organization based Self-
esteem and burout. Int J Business Sos Sci, 383-288.
Fairbrother, K., & Warn, J. (2003). Workplace dimensions, stress and job satisfaction.
Emerald Insight, 8-21.
Glazer, S., & Kruse, B. (2008). The role of organizational commitment in occupational
stress models. International Journal of Stress Management, 329-344.
Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H., & Waschull, S. (1995). Not all high (or low) self-esteem
people are the same: Theory and research on stability of self-esteem. Springer,
51-71.
Page 9 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Holmgren, K., & Frantz, A. (2019). The work stress Questionaire (WSQ) - reliability and
face validity among maleworkers. Springer , 1-8.
ILO. (2020). Managing work-related psychosocial risks during the COVID-19 pandemic.
International Labout Organization.
Jiang, Y., & Wen, J. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on hotel marketing and management: a
perspective article. emerald , 2563-2573.
Laveena D' Mello, N. M., & Pinto, N. (2018). A study on the Self Esteem and Academic
Performance among Students. International Journal of Health Sciences and
Pharmacy.
Liu, Y., Wang, M., Chang, C.-H., Shi, J., Zhou, L., & Shao, R. (2014). Work–Family
Conflict, Emotional Exhaustion, and Displaced Aggression Toward Others: The
Moderating Roles of Workplace Interpersonal Conflict and Perceived Managerial
Family Support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18.
Marinaki, A. (2020). Why you should prioritize workplace stress management during the
pandemic. Retrieved from HR Toolkit:
https://resources.workable.com/tutorial/workplace-stress-management-during-
the-pandemic
Meenakshi, 1. S., V., M. V., & Ravichandran, D. K. (2013). The Importance of Work-Life-
Balance. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 5.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective,
continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Occupational
Psychology, 1-18.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective,
continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Occupational
Page 10 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Psychology, 1-18.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research,
and Application . SAGE Publications, Inc. .
Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: toward a general
model. 229-326.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Self Esteem and the Adolescent. Social Forces, 255-256.
Ruzungunde, V. S., Murugan, C., & Hlayywayo, C. K. (2016). The Influence of Job
Stress on The Components of Organizational Commitment of Health Care
Personnel in the Eastern Cape Province South Africa. International Business and
Economics Research , 219-226.
S, Z., Setati, T., Rachidi, M., & Ukpere, W. I. (2015). Occupational stress and
organizational commitment of employees at higher educational institution.
Governance and Regulation, 740-746.
Page 11 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business. WILEY.
Stavropoulos, V., Lazaratou, H., Marini, E., & Dikeos, D. (2015). Low family satisfaction
and depression in adolescence: The role of self-esteem. . Journal of Education
and Development Psychology , 109-118.
Ullrich, A., & FitzGerald, P. (1990). Stress experienced by physicians and nurses in the
cancer ward. Science Direct, 1013-1022.
2. Research objectives:
Objektif penyelidikan:
Page 12 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
3. Expected benefits:
Faedah yang dijangka:
Besides, this study also significant in gathering aspect and give top management
information regarding the current state or level of employee’s organization commitment.
This is beneficial to understand what factors constrain their employees to achieve
commitment towards organization to enhance organization’s performance.
6. Location of research:
Lokasi penyelidikan dijalankan:
Page 13 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
In this research, it was a framework for the collection, measurement and analysis of data
on work life balance and perceived stress and how these variables related to employee’s
organization commitment on executive and non-executive staffs in Sacofa.
Sampling Technique:
This study shall engage a non-probability and convenience sampling where the data are
collected from employees in Sacofa. The distribution of the questionnaire will be via
online due to current condition of Conditional Movement Control Order (CMCO) in order
to reach the targeted respondents and at the same time maintain social distancing.
Page 14 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Inclusion criteria:
Kriteria kemasukan:
Not applicable
Exclusion criteria:
Kriteria pengecualian:
Not applicable
9. Sample size:
Pengiraan:
Page 15 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Page 16 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
For this research, the answered questionnaire will be analyzed to ensure the respondent
answer all the questions appropriately. Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences
(SPSS) will be used to analyze the data collected from the respondents. The relationship
between two quantitative continuous variables is explored using correlation techniques.
The correlation coefficient of Pearson (r) is a measure of the correlated intensity of both
variables. The measurement was made by the Cronbach alpha to know the degree of
quality of the object. In the mean interrelationship between items that measure a term
Cronbach's alpha is measured, the closer the alpha of Cronbach is to 1, the higher the
reliability of internal coherence. The most suitable alpha of Cronbach to use is greater
than 0.6.
1. Grant / Source: NA
Geran / Sumber:
3. Total allocation: NA
Jumlah peruntukan:
4. Duration of grant: NA
Jangkamasa peruntukan:
5. Investigator services / NA
professional fees:
Yuran perkhidmatan penyelidik /
professional:
6. UiTM fees: NA
Yuran kepada UiTM:
Page 17 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Page 18 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
Office:
-
Telefon pejabat:
Mobile phone:
0109556943
Telefon bimbit:
Email:
ngshazlindaa@gmail.com
Emel:
Signature: Date:
Tandatangan: Tarikh: 16.03.2021
Office:
082 – 677231
Telefon pejabat:
Mobile phone:
012 8832348
Telefon bimbit:
Email:
ellencsm@uitm.edu.my
Emel:
Signature: Date: 16.3.2021
Tandatangan: Tarikh:
Page 19 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
3. Penyelidik Bersama
Co-Researcher
Office:
-
Telefon pejabat:
Mobile phone:
0167230596
Telefon bimbit:
Email:
zuridah.sarifuddin@yahoo.com
Emel:
Signature: Date:
Tandatangan: Tarikh: 16/03/2021
Office:
-
Telefon pejabat:
Mobile phone:
0198675244
Telefon bimbit:
Email:
magdalene87anat@gmail.com
Emel:
Signature: Date:
Tandatangan: Tarikh: 16/03/2021
Page 20 of 21
REC 2 / 2019 Rev 3 (2020)
More than minimal risk research. Recommend for approval with presentation.
Penyelidikan melibatkan risiko melebihi minima. Dicadangkan untuk mendapat kelulusan
dengan pembentangan.
Comment if any:
Ulasan jika ada:
Page 21 of 21
REC 3 / 2019 Rev 2 (2020)
Name of Researcher* :
(1) Alicia Anak Anat
Nama Penyelidik*:
(2) Shazlinda binti Sulaiman Ng
(3) Zuridah binti Sarifuddin
Name of Supervisor :
Dr Ellen Chung
Nama Penyelia:
Page 4 of 4
REC 4/ 2020/BM Pind. 2 (2020)
Research Title
Introduction of Research
The Sarawak Government through the State Disaster Management Committee or SDMC took
early stringent measures to break the transmission of COVID-19. Together with the relevant
authorities and agencies, they continue to anticipate and plan critical strategic responses to
the developing situation in both managing the outbreak and its impact including safeguarding
the welfare and well-being of the less well-off. To ensure that the containment efforts are
successful and the sacrifices of the many over these past months have not been in vain,
everyone in Sacofa Sdn. Bhd. (Sacofa) is to continue to cooperate and comply with all
directives and to adapt to the new normal while maintaining the physical and mental
health. Sacofa has had to make many changes in the way they work. Some of these work
practices include greater use of the collaborative tools for those working from home and the
implementation of stronger social distancing guidelines at work.
Sacofa has implementing the new work arrangement (NWA) during movement control order
(MCO). The NWA will minimize the number of staff required to be in the office at any one time
to make everyone safer from potential COVID-19 exposure. Thus, the staff will be work from
home (WFH) and also split team working (STW) for shifts staff. While NWA has been effective
in ensuring Sacofa’s business continuity while reducing the risk of transmission of COVID-19,
there have also been many challenges in adapting to their new routines for both work and
personal commitments, leading to higher stress levels. Therefore, this study investigates on
connection between the organization commitment of employees with work-life balance and
perceived stress in Sacofa, Kuching, during this Covid-19 Pandemic.
REC 4/ 2020/BM Pind. 2 (2020)
Purpose of Research
Besides, this study also significant in gathering aspect and give top management information
regarding the current state or level of employee’s organization commitment. This is beneficial
to understand what factors constrain their employees to achieve commitment towards
organization to enhance organization’s performance.
Research Procedure
Participation in Research
Your participation in this research is entirely voluntary. You may refuse to take part in the
study or you may withdraw yourself from participation in the research at any time without
penalty.
Benefit of Research
Information obtained from this research will benefit the individuals, researchers, institution and
community for the advancement of knowledge and future practice.
Research Risk
No risk.
REC 4/ 2020/BM Pind. 2 (2020)
Confidentiality
Your information will be kept confidential by the investigators and will not be made public
unless disclosure is required by law.
By signing this consent form, you will authorize the review of records, analysis and use of the
data arising from this research.
If you have any question about this research or your rights, please contact the investigator at
telephone number as follows:
______________________________________________________________________
Consent Form1
To become a participant in the research, you or your legal guardian are required to sign this
Consent Form.
I herewith confirm that I have met the requirement of age and am capable of acting on behalf
of myself / as2 a legal guardian as follows:
______________________________________________________________________
Name of Participant/Legally authorized representative (LAR) Signature
______________________________________________________________________
I.C No Date
______________________________________________________________________
Name of Witness3 Signature
______________________________________________________________________
I.C No Date
______________________________________________________________________
Name of Consent Taker Signature
______________________________________________________________________
I.C No Date
1
Original signed copy is to be retained by the Principal Investigator.
2
Delete whichever is not applicable.
3
A witness is only required for oral consent.
REC 4/ 2020/BM Pind. 2 (2020)
Tajuk penyelidikan
Pengenalan penyelidikan
Sacofa telah melaksanakan jadual kerja baharu semasa perintah kawalan pergerakan (MCO).
Jadual kerja baharu akan meminimumkan bilangan kakitangan yang diperlukan untuk berada
di pejabat pada satu-satu masa untuk keselamatan kakitangan. Oleh itu, kakitangan akan
bekerja dari rumah dan juga berkerja mengikut jadual yg ditetapkan bergilir-gilir. Walaupun
jadual kerja baharu adalah efektif dalam memastikan kesinambungan perniagaan Sacofa
sambil mengurangi risiko penularan COVID-19, terdapat banyak cabaran dalam
menyesuaikan diri dengan rutin baru untuk komitmen kerja dan peribadi, yang boleh
menyebabkan tekanan yang lebih tinggi. Oleh itu, kajian ini adalah untuk mengkaji hubungan
antara komitmen organisasi pekerja dengan keseimbangan kerja-kehidupan dan tekanan
yang dirasakan di Sacofa, Kuching, semasa Pandemik Covid-19 ini.
REC 4/ 2020/BM Pind. 2 (2020)
Tujuan penyelidikan
Penyelidikan ini bermanfaat bagi akademik dan juga perspektif pelaksanaan praktikal. Secara
akademik, kajian ini bermanfaat dalam memberikan pengetahuan dalam bidang seperti
bagaimana keseimbangan kehidupan kerja dan tekanan yang dirasakan mempengaruhi
komitmen organisasi pekerja serta bagaimana harga diri memberi kesan terhadap komitmen
organisasi pekerja.
Selain itu, kajian ini juga penting dalam mengumpulkan aspek dan memberikan maklumat
pengurusan atasan mengenai keadaan semasa atau tahap komitmen organisasi pekerja. Ini
bermanfaat untuk memahami faktor apa yang mengekang pekerja mereka untuk mencapai
komitmen terhadap organisasi untuk meningkatkan prestasi organisasi.
Prosedur penyelidikan
Manfaat penyelidikan
Maklumat yang didapati dari penyelidikan ini akan memanfaatkan individu, penyelidik, institusi
dan komuniti dalam kemajuan pengetahuan dan amalan pada masa hadapan.
Risiko penyelidikan
Tiada
REC 4/ 2020/BM Pind. 2 (2020)
Kerahsiaan
Maklumat anda akan dirahsiakan oleh penyelidik dan tidak akan didedahkan melainkan jika
ia dikehendaki oleh undang-undang.
Sekiranya anda mempunyai sebarang pertanyaan mengenai penyelidikan ini atau hak-hak
anda, sila hubungi talian di bawah:
______________________________________________________________________
Borang Izin1
Untuk menyertai penyelidikan ini, anda atau penjaga sah perlu menandatangani Borang Izin
ini.
Saya dengan ini mengesahkan bahawa saya telah memenuhi syarat umur dan berupaya
bertindak bagi pihak saya sendiri/ sebagai2 penjaga yang sah dalam perkara-perkara berikut:
______________________________________________________________________
Nama Peserta/ Wakil Sah yang berkuatkuasa Tandatangan
______________________________________________________________________
No. Kad Pengenalan Tarikh
______________________________________________________________________
Nama Saksi3 Tandatangan
______________________________________________________________________
No. Kad Pengenalan Tarikh
______________________________________________________________________
Nama Penyelidik/Pengambil Izin Tandatangan
______________________________________________________________________
No. Kad Pengenalan Tarikh
1
Salinan asal disimpan oleh Penyelidik Utama dan satu salinan diserahkan kepada peserta.
2
Potong mana yang tidak berkenaan.
3
Saksi dimestikan bagi izin secara lisan.
REC 5 / 2019 Rev.3 (2020)
Applicant Checklist
Senarai Semak Pemohon
1. Please ensure that all research team members have signed the application.
2. Please ensure that the application has been signed and endorsed by the
Faculty/Campus Research Committee.
3. All required documents must be submitted within two (2) working weeks before the
scheduled REC meeting.
4. Submission of all forms prescribed by the REC must be in English, with exception
to research conducted in other languages (with Senate approval).
5. Any data collection instruments that require completion by respondents/participants
must be prepared in the Malay and English languages, and other language(s)
understood by the participants.
ITEM YES NO
PERKARA YA TIDAK
Part A – For All Applicants
Bahagian A – Untuk Semua Pemohon
1 Have you completed the REC 2 form? /
Adakah anda telah melengkapkan Borang REC 2?
2 Have you completed the REC 3 form? /
Adakah anda telah melengkapkan Borang REC 3?
3 Have you completed the REC 4 form? /
Adakah anda telah melengkapkan Borang REC 4?
4 Has the form been signed by all researchers? /
Adakah borang ditandatangani oleh semua penyelidik?
5 Has your application been approved and endorsement by your /
Faculty/State Research Committee?
Sudahkah permohonan anda mendapat kelulusan dan pengesahan
Jawatankuasa Penyelidikan Fakulti/Negeri?
6 Has your supervisor checked for grammatical errors in REC 2 /
and REC 4 forms?
Adakah penyelia anda telah menyemak untuk kesalahan tatabahasa
dalam Borang REC 2 dan Borang REC 4?
Page 1 of 4
REC 5 / 2019 Rev.3 (2020)
* For Clinical Trials, please complete Part B. For Non-Clinical Trial application please
proceed to Part C, and sign on page 5.
Bagi permohonan Penyelidikan Klinikal, sila lengkapkan Bahagian B. Bagi permohonan
penyelidikan Bukan Klinikal sila isi Bahagian C dan tandatangan di Halaman 5.
Page 2 of 4
REC 5 / 2019 Rev.3 (2020)
https://forms.gle/KdyiNMNsLT2UR6fL7
Page 3 of 4
REC 5 / 2019 Rev.3 (2020)
https://forms.gle/LJ4i6NDepi2Kf93g8
(c) Re-present
Pembentangan semula
Applicant is required to:
Pemohon dikehendaki:
https://forms.gle/LJ4i6NDepi2Kf93g8
(d) Not approved due to ethical issues that cannot be satisfactorily resolved.
Recommend to resubmit.
Tidak lulus disebabkan penyelesaian isu etika yang tidak memuaskan.
Dicadangkan untuk memohon semula.
Page 4 of 4