Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Katherine Neil
November 9, 2021
2
Abstract
The concept I have chosen to research is Community Capitals Framework & Spiraling Up. While
this is a broad topic, I intend to look at this through the lens of The Commons and its potential to
drive economic development in the Bonavista area. Research Methodology included academic
sources for the exploration and understanding of the concept itself, and secondary sources for
information on The Commons as a business entity, and its potential impact on economic
I will explain the Community Capitals Framework & Spiraling Up, elaborate on the enterprise I
have chosen, and link it back to the framework, expanding on the roles The Commons have and
how it contributes to regional economic development, as well as its future potential in this and
other areas.
3
economic development efforts can by analyzed from a systems perspective. This is done by
identifying assets that fall under each of the seven types of community capital components, the
interaction and overlap between them, and the impacts resulting from investments made to
them. CCF emphasizes assets and investments over needs and deficits. The seven
components are: natural capital, cultural capital, human capital, social capital, political capital,
Emery, M., & Flora, C. (2006). Spiraling-Up: Mapping Community Transformation with
Community Capitals Framework. Community Development (Columbus, Ohio)
4
Natural Capital
Natural capital refers to the natural resources of a community, that already exist and are
not man-made (Jacobs 2011). This includes air, land and landscape, bodies of water,
biodiversity, wind, natural resources, natural beauty, and anything else in the natural
environment (Emery & Flora, 2006; Beaulieu, 2014; Jacobs 2011). Natural capital assets can
contribute greatly to the economy as a driver of tourism and source of natural resources, and
Cultural Capital
Cultural capital reflects how communities and groups see the world, how they act within
it, how they explain it, and their views on what is possible to change. This includes cultural
aspects such as language, traditions, values, beliefs, art, and everything that shapes lives
through family, history, ethnicity, and spirituality. (Emery & Flora, 2006; Flora et Al., 2016;
Beaulieu, 2014; Jacobs 2011). Cultural capital influences what voices are heard and have
influence in the community, how influence and creativity emerges, and helps understand
community life as a frame of reference (Emery & Flora, 2006; Beaulieu, 2014). When two or
more populations coexist, conflicting cultural capital may exist, complicating influence and
decision making. Investing in cultural capital can help build unity and define community identity,
and enhance tourism. Cultural capital can actively be used as an economic resource in the form
Human Capital
Human capital is contributed to by the skills, knowledge, talents, and potential of the
people within a community. (Flora et Al. 2016) Individuals’ efforts to enhance their leadership
and interpersonal skills also falls under Human capital, as well as educational institutions and
other training programs. Communities with good Human capital are more resilient to uncertainty
5
in the economy, and tend to experience growth and stability (Beaulieu, 2014). Creativity and
leadership are also key in Human capital. Resourcefulness, learning from others, and the ability
to access outside knowledge can help to build Human capital. Community members’ ideas and
willingness to participate helps drive Human capitals’ strong ties to the other capitals (Jacobs,
2011). Human capital also addresses leadership’s ability to act proactively and lead across
Social Capital
The glue of a community, Social capital is the connections among individuals and
organizations in a community. Well functioning connections can be a resource for mutual benefit
among actors, using reciprocal labour and funds, and shared knowledge and ideas (Jacobs,
2011). Social capital comprises bonding and bridging activities. Bonding refers to the strong ties
and frequent interactions individuals have with friends, family, close coworkers, and neighbors
(Beaulieu, 2011) Bridging reflects the ties that people have with others within the community
with whom they have limited or infrequent interaction, and helps Social capital by bringing
people together who collectively possess more knowledge and ideas than they would acting as
individuals (Jacobs, 2011; Beaulieu, 2014). Vertical linkages offer a channel for actors within the
community to find resources external to the community (Beaulieu, 2014). Social capital is critical
in a community. By studying the interaction between types of capital and outside investment, we
can see the integral part social capital has to play in the community (Emery & Flora, 2006).
Political Capital
Political capital is the leverage to make things happen. It can be possessed by groups as
well as individuals, and is based on power, influence, voice, and connections (Jacobs, 2011). It
also refers to an actors connection to resources, and people’s ability to engage in contributing to
community wellbeing (Emery & Flora, 2006) Political capital can also affect how resources are
6
distributed in the community. Efforts to develop existing and create new leadership, and
promote engagement in the community are also Political capital aspects. Understanding the
Political capital of a community can give insight to who posses this power, shapes local
decisions, and essentially calls the shots (Beaulieu, 2014). Access to Political capital can open
doors and push things forward, while a lack of Political capital can stop projects and initiatives
Financial Capital
Financial capital is comprised of the financial resources and money a community has
available to it for investment purposes rather than consumption purposes. This includes things
such as loan funds, grants, wealth transfers, bond issues, tax abatements, and initiatives like
local taxation to fund community building funds (Jacobs, 2011). This also includes financial
institutions like community development banks, venture capital, and loan funds, whose job is to
inject financial resources and stimulate wealth creation and the community’s economy.
(Beaulieu, 2014). Financial capital potentially impacts the other six capitals, as it drives most
Built Capital
Built capital refers to the man-made infrastructure which supports activities and the other
community capitals such as buildings, public places, roads, airports, communication technology.
It also includes water and sewer systems, land uses, and how the community is laid out. Built
capital does not stand on its own, but rather allows people to be productive through using it.
The Community Capitals Framework is more than a theoretical framework, it can aid in
the tangible and intangible capitals present in a community to determine strengths to draw from,
and shortcomings where investment is needed. (Aquino et Al., 2018) The framework
Cheryl Jacobs at South Dakota State University suggests that to understand how the
capitals in a community work together, think of it as a community bank with seven accounts,
each with their own opportunities, strengths, and skills. The resource contents of the individual
accounts can be utilized, invested, spent, or squandered and used up, much like traditional
Capitals’ resources can enhance or diminish each other, and be transformed between
capitals. Investing in or prioritizing one capital over another can lead to decapitalizing the others,
and can compromise economic, environmental, or social equity. (Fey et Al., 2006) Investments
in the community can have both positive and negative effects on capitals. An example of such
would be a new factory providing jobs, decreasing unemployment, and increasing human capital
through training, but also negative environmental impact. This presents additional opportunities
from those negative impacts such as mitigation projects for waste and environmental impacts.
(Jacobs, 2011)
Spiraling Up
Investing in improvements to one capital can foster improvement opportunities for other
community capitals (Beaulieu, 2014). The flow of resources between capitals can lead to a
process of resources building on resources to increase community capital capacity and create a
self-reinforcing cycle, and a spiraling up effect. This process of resources attracting other
resources and the success building on itself supports Gunnar Myrdal’s theory of cumulative
causation, which can also run in the opposite direction whereby resource losses foster more
losses, contributing to Spiraling Down of the community (Emery & Flora, 2006). Strategically
investing in capital capacities results in those capitals building on each other, spiraling up, and
8
contributing to economic growth in the community (Emery & Flora, 2006). The CCF allows for a
deeper and nuanced understanding of how capitals work together, and the multi-pronged
approach often needed for long term economic prosperity (Beaulieu, 2014).
Emery, M., & Flora, C. (2006). Spiraling-Up: Mapping Community Transformation with
Community Capitals Framework. Community Development (Columbus, Ohio)
9
Spiraling Up in Practice
Beaulieu, 2014 outlines a scenario whereby local community leaders reach out to people
in the community for input on a project. That communication effort strengthened communication
between leaders and residents, which became a quarterly meeting with groups to continue input
and feedback, which positively affected social and political capitals. The citizens then pressured
those leaders to invest in local businesses to seed innovation in the community, which the
leaders then do via a program focusing on skill improvements for business owners at risk,
improving human capital. They then established a small loan program by working with local
banks that invests in new ventures. That program and entrepreneurial focus contributed to
retention of educated and creative workers within the community, and an increase in financial
capital capacity (Beaulieu, 2014). This scenario demonstrates how investment in community
capital provides positive shifts which have a spiraling up effect on the community as a whole.
Emery & Flora explore how implementing HTC (HomeTown Competition) using the CCF
in Valley County, Nebraska led to spiraling up of the community. This initiative was proposed to
reverse disinvestments and neglect, and focused on reversing per-capita income, population
decline, and stem outmigration. Funded by grant money, HTC formalized their strategy for
increasing philanthropy through wealth transfers, retain youth in the community, increase
leadership capacity, and strengthen the local economy. These strategy segments together
created asset growth and spiraling up, and reversed the downward spiral they had been
students involved with other residents in making a difference in the community. HTC worked to
attract young professionals to work toward expanding local businesses, or taking them over
from retiring owners and keep them operating through inter-generational transfer, adding to the
human capital capacity of Valley County and driving job creation. HTC also implemented a local
option tax and helped promote wealth capture options to increase financial capacity.
10
Professionals were also trained to foster estate planning donations (increasing their Human
capital) and make philanthropy and giving back more widely known. HTC also set up a
leadership development initiative that participated in skill building involving students and the
general public. These initiatives also increased cultural and political capital by changing
community views, increasing participation in the community, and encouraging people to use
their voice in community affairs. These strategies together addressed the root causes of the
decline, helped foster sustainability, and spiral the county up (Emery & Flora, 2006). A detailed
change of each community capital is listed in their paper, but not included here for conciseness.
The Commons
community collaboration and helping remove access barriers for entrepreneurs and small
businesses. This is done by providing affordable open coworking space, private office space,
guidance, access to resources, and networking opportunities. Business service offerings include
traditional services like printing and shredding, Wi-Fi connectivity, meeting room and equipment
rentals, and business start-up and growth assistance. (The Commons, 2021)
Launched in the summer of 2018, The Commons’ aim was to be a hub for business
innovation in the Bonavista area, offering co-working space, meeting rooms, office services, and
Wi-Fi. Housed in the Public Building of the Bonavista-Trinity Regional Chamber of Commerce
(BTRCC) at 28 Church Street in Bonavista, The Commons was the first co-working space in the
Coworking is a work style that uses shared, open workspace targeted at small business
from the distraction and isolation of working from home, at a fraction of the cost of traditional
BTRCC President John Norman spoke with CBC on how The Commons was to be a
hub for incubation, business supports, collaboration, and innovation, that helps overcome
entrepreneurial problems such as lack of affordable office space, and help make the Bonavista
The Commons also includes The Marketplace, a retail rental space dedicated to allowing
entrepreneurs to explore ideas, and experiment with products and offerings, to see what works
best for them and their business. It gives makers access to three sizes of low-cost storefront
space, business support services, networking opportunities, and access to tourism customers
In December 2019, The Commons was looking to add a Community Ecosystem and
Innovation Coordinator to work directly with entrepreneurs, business partners, and stakeholders
to Strategically and Operationally lead The Commons (The Commons Bonavista, 2019).
The Commons, in acting in its full capacity, to its full potential, and availing of its
partnerships, could have direct impact on the economic development of the Bonavista area, and
foster spiraling up. Its usage of and contribution to individual community capitals are discussed
Regarding Human capital, The Commons can increase human capital directly by
providing assistance with business matters the business owner may not have proficiency in, and
guidance on operations and other logistics. This contributes to the scope and quality of
12
entrepreneurial skills of business orders. Sharing common space amongst business owners
allows them to collaborate and combine their talents, knowledge & skills, increasing the range of
human capital they have access to, and growing their own levels. Utilizing provided Human
capital and increasing their own, fosters growth in business owners’ individual businesses.
Fostering a sense of community through shared space, The Commons affects Social
capital by increasing bonding activities by creating ties with other business owners and
community members, and building connections between them. Additionally, The Commons is
fostering bridging activities by creating linkages between business owners and resources
located outside the community such as funding agencies, assistance programs, and access to
wellbeing and fostering a sense of community and support by business owners working in the
same space, which encourages collaboration. This allows business owners’ to change and
enhance their views on what is possible, nurture their creativity, and increase their confidence
and influence. While some conflicting cultural capital may exist between entrepreneurs and
other community members who may be older, disheartened, or set in their ways and averse to
change, Newfoundlanders, especially in rural areas have a strong sense of community and tend
to work together when needed for the greater good of the community.
By using space in the BRTCC Public Building for their location, The Commons are using
Built capital to help business owners by providing access physical space where they would
otherwise not have opportunity, especially when primarily working from home. The commons
itself is using municipal Built capital through their office space and community infrastructure, but
they are also providing built capital to members in the form of their communication technologies
(Office Wi-Fi, Fax machines, and Phones). Another way The Commons is contributing via Built
Capital is The Marketplace, which allocates a portion of their collective retail space to business
13
owners to launch and sell their products that they normally would not have had retail space to
do. Brick & mortar physical space is expensive, and The Marketplace helps business owners to
not rely solely on ecommerce, or on community functions like craft fairs to physically sell their
products offline.
operating needs such as office space, meeting rooms, and access to technology by charging a
much smaller fee than what the business owner would have to pay for their own traditional office
space. Staff offers assistance in accessing financial capital by helping business owners identify
funding opportunities they may qualify for that they may not have found on their own, and apply
for them. They also help business owners’ bottom line by saving them from having to invest in
their own equipment, technology, and connectivity, which reduces businesses’ fixed costs and
With its close ties to the BTRCC and municipal government through John Norman, The
Commons can also draw from and contribute to Political capital. With business owners’
decreasing their power distance and increasing their influence and voice, they can help foster a
capacity increase in Political capital. This is done by fostering leadership skills among clients,
who then gain those skills and adapt them for themselves. The Commons helps clients build
wellbeing. The Marketplace also helps with this, as it fosters networking, and increases
There also exists other initiatives that The Commons could partner with in the future to
increase their local impact, increase political capital connections in the community, and perhaps
pass clients off to once they have been incubated and are ready to move on to thrive as their
own entity. Bonavista Creative, an initiative which fosters and promotes local unique businesses
through their commercial spaces, is a prime example of this. Bonavista Creative is part of a
14
working trio of companies (along with Bonavista Living, and Bonavista Bonavista Workshop)
which work to restore & preserve Bonavista’s heritage and capitalize on it to spur economic
regeneration. Looking to the future, they would make an excellent candidate for collaboration in
Generally speaking, if The Commons were to operate at capacity and to their full
potential, their vision of being a business incubation space with goals of fostering economic
growth in the community could be met and exceeded. They have the unique opportunity to
incubate local businesses and foster their growth, allowing them to gain traction faster than they
would have on their own, and succeed in the wild once they’re ready. This then builds their
reputation and public image as a worthwhile investment to both private and public institutions
looking to make a difference in the region. Their success also would increase the capacity of
Human capital in the area, as more people would consider staying in the area a viable option.
Finally, seeing the viability and success of The Commons’ business model in the
Bonavista area would help other areas of Newfoundland and Labrador come up with their own
plans to foster economic growth and development in their regions. This would be beneficial to
the province as a whole, especially after the loss of the Regional Economic Development
References
Aquino, R. S., Lück, M., & Schänzel, H. A. (2018). A conceptual framework of tourism social
entrepreneurship for sustainable community development. Journal of Hospitality and
Tourism Management, 37, 23–32.
Beaulieu, L. J. (2014). Promoting Community Vitality & Sustainability: The Community Capitals
Framework. Purdue University.
CBC/Radio Canada. (2018, June 30). Bonavista gets even more business-friendly with new
incubator space | CBC News. CBC News. Retrieved November 9, 2021, from
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/bonavista-business-incubator-
the-commons-opens-1.4720832.
Emery, M., & Flora, C. (2006). Spiraling-Up: Mapping Community Transformation with
Community Capitals Framework. Community Development (Columbus, Ohio), 37(1), 19–
35.
Fey, S., Flora, C., & Bregendahl, C. (2006). The Measurement of Community Capitals through
Research. Online Journal of Rural Research & Policy, 1(1).
Flora, C. B., Flora, J. L., & Gasteyer, S. P. (2016). Rural Communities: Legacy and Change. In
Rural Communities: Legacy + Change (4th ed., pp. 1–488). Routledge.
Jacobs, Cheryl, "Measuring Success in Communities: The Community Capitals Framework"
(2011). SDSU Extension Extra Archives. 517. Retrieved November 9, 2021, from
https://openprairie.sdstate.edu/extension_extra/517
The Commons Bonavista. (2019, December 3). Retrieved November 9, 2021, from
https://www.facebook.com/TheCommonsBonavista/.