X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6

231 3 294 8.2 8.2 11

156 2.2 232 6.9 4.1 12
10 0.5 149 3 4.3 15
519 5.5 600 12 16.1 1
437 4.4 567 10.6 14.1 5
487 4.8 571 11.8 12.7 4
299 3.1 512 8.1 10.1 10
195 2.5 347 7.7 8.4 12
20 1.2 212 3.3 2.1 15
68 0.6 102 4.9 4.7 8
570 5.4 788 17.4 12.3 1
428 4.2 577 10.5 14 7
464 4.7 535 11.3 15 3
15 0.6 163 2.5 2.5 14
65 1.2 168 4.7 3.3 11
98 1.6 151 4.6 2.7 10
398 4.3 342 5.5 16 4
161 2.6 196 7.2 6.3 13
397 3.8 453 10.4 13.9 7
497 5.3 518 11.5 16.3 1
528 5.6 615 12.3 16 0
99 0.8 278 2.8 6.5 14
0.5 1.1 142 3.1 1.6 12
347 3.6 461 9.6 11.3 6
341 3.5 382 9.8 11.5 5
507 5.1 590 12 15.7 0
400 8.6 517 7 12 8
All Greens Franchise

The data (X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6) are for each franchise store.
X1 = annual net sales/$1000
X2 = area of store in sq. ft./1000
X3 = inventory/$1000
X4 = amount spent on advertizing/$1000
X5 = size of sales district/1000 families
X6 = number of competing stores in district

Perform the following:

1. Determine which variabls are correlated.

2. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and area of store in sq. ft. as independet variable, perfo
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.
3. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and inventory as independet variable, perform simple l
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.
4. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and amount spent on advertizing as independet variabl
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.
5. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and size of sales district independent variable, perform
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.
6. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and number of competing stores in district as independ
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.
ariable, perform simple linear regression.

orm simple linear regression.

endet variable, perform simple linear regression.

ble, perform simple linear regression.

as independent variable, perform simple linear regression.

Perform the following:

1. Determine which variabls are correlated.

Pearson's Correlations

X1 - X2 0.894

X1 - X3 0.946

X1 - X4 0.914

X1 - X5 0.954

-
X1 - X6

0.912

X2 - X3 0.844

X2 - X4 0.749

X2 - X5 0.838

-
X2 - X6

0.766
 X3 - X4 0.906

X3 - X5 0.864

-
X3 - X6

0.807

X4 - X5 0.795

-
X4 - X6

0.841

X5 - X6 -0.87

0.001

2. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and area of store in sq. ft. as independet va
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.

Linear Regression
Model Summary - annual net sales

Model R

H₀ 0
H₁ 0.894

ANOVA
Model  

H₁ Regression

  Residual
  Total

Note.  The intercept model is omitted, as no meaningful information can be shown.

Coefficients

Model  

H₀ (Intercept)

H₁ (Intercept)

area of store in
 
sq. ft.

Descriptives
  N
annual net sales 27
area of store in sq. ft. 27

3. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and inventory as independet variable, perf
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.

Linear Regression
Model Summary - annual net sales

Model R

H₀ 0

H₁ 0.946

ANOVA
Model  

H₁ Regression

  Residual
  Total

Note.  The intercept model is omitted, as no meaningful information can be shown.

Coefficients

Model  

H₀ (Intercept)

H₁ (Intercept)

  inventory

Descriptives
  N
annual net sales 27
inventory 27

4. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and amount spent on advertizing as indepe
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.

Linear Regression
Model Summary - annual net sales
Model R

H₀ 0
H₁ 0.914

ANOVA
Model  

H₁ Regression

  Residual
  Total

Note.  The intercept model is omitted, as no meaningful information can be shown.

Coefficients

Model  

H₀ (Intercept)

H₁ (Intercept)

amount spent on
 
advertizing
5. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and size of sales district independent varia
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.

Linear Regression
Model Summary - annual net sales

Model R

H₀ 0

H₁ 0.954

ANOVA

Model  

H₁ Regression

  Residual
  Total

Note.  The intercept model is omitted, as no meaningful information can be shown.

Coefficients

Model  
H₀ (Intercept)

H₁ (Intercept)

size of sales
 
district

Descriptives
  N
annual net sales 27
size of sales district 27

6. Setting Annual net sales as dependent variable and number of competing stores in district
INTERPRET THE RESULTS.

Linear Regression
Model Summary - annual net sales

Model R

H₀ 0

H₁ 0.912
ANOVA
Model  

H₁ Regression

  Residual
  Total

Note.  The intercept model is omitted, as no meaningful information can be shown.

Coefficients

Model  

H₀ (Intercept)

H₁ (Intercept)

number of
  competing stores
in district

Descriptives
  N
annual net sales 27
number of competing stores in district 27
 Very Strong
*** < .001
Positive Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001
Positive Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001
Positive Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001
Positive Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001 Negative
Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001
Positive Correlation

Strong Positive
*** < .001
Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001
Positive Correlation

Strong Negative
*** < .001
Correlation
 Very Strong
*** < .001
Positive Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001
Positive Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001 Negative
Correlation

Strong Positive
*** < .001
Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001 Negative
Correlation

Very Strong
*** < .001 Negative
Correlation

q. ft. as independet variable, perform simple linear regression.

Durbin-Watson
R² Adjusted R² RMSE Autocorrelation

0 0 192.062 0.252
 0.799 0.791 87.725 -0.016

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F

766689 1 766689 99.627

192391 25 7695.64
959080 26

be shown.

Unstandardized Standard Error Standardized t

286.574 36.962 7.753

2.577 33.085 0.078

85.389 8.555 0.894 9.981

Mean SD SE
286.574 192.062 36.962
 3.326 2.011 0.387

ependet variable, perform simple linear regression.

Durbin-Watson
R² Adjusted R² RMSE Autocorrelation

0 0 192.062 0.252

0.894 0.89 63.776 0.219

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F

857396 1 857396 210.798

101684 25 4067.38
959080 26

be shown.
 Unstandardized Standard Error Standardized t

286.574 36.962 7.753

-81.504 28.167 -2.894

0.95 0.065 0.946 14.519

Mean SD SE
286.574 192.062 36.962
387.481 191.168 36.79

advertizing as independet variable, perform simple linear regression.

R² Adjusted R² RMSE

0 0 192.062
 0.835 0.829 79.455

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F

801254 1 801254 126.92

157826 25 6313.05
959080 26

be shown.

Unstandardized Standard Error Standardized t

286.574 36.962 7.753

-90.15 36.77 -2.452

46.509 4.128 0.914 11.266

rict independent variable, perform simple linear regression.

Durbin-Watson
R² Adjusted R² RMSE Autocorrelation

0 0 192.062 0.252

0.91 0.906 58.919 -0.273

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F

872294 1 872294 251.278

86786 25 3471.43
959080 26

be shown.

Unstandardized Standard Error Standardized t

 286.574 36.962 7.753

-58.823 24.563 -2.395

35.635 2.248 0.954 15.852

Mean SD SE
286.574 192.062 36.962
9.693 5.14 0.989

eting stores in district as independent variable, perform simple linear regression.

Durbin-Watson
R² Adjusted R² RMSE Autocorrelation

0 0 192.062 0.252

0.832 0.825 80.239 0.151

 Sum of Squares df Mean Square F

798123 1 798123 123.965

160957 25 6438.3
959080 26

be shown.

Unstandardized Standard Error Standardized t

286.574 36.962 7.753

563.593 29.283 19.246

-35.787 3.214 -0.912 -11.134

Mean SD SE
286.574 192.062 36.962
7.741 4.896 0.942
Durbin-Watson
Statistic p

1.479 0.164
 1.438 0.115

< .001

 
 

95% CI

p Lower Upper

< .001 210.597 362.551

0.939 -65.562 70.716

< .001 67.77 103.008

Durbin-Watson
Statistic p

1.479 0.164

1.55 0.21

< .001

 
 
 95% CI
p Lower Upper

< .001 210.597 362.551

0.008 -139.51 -23.494

< .001 0.815 1.085

 p

< .001

 
 

< .001

0.022

< .001
Durbin-Watson
Statistic p

1.479 0.164

2.535 0.171

< .001

 
 

95% CI
p Lower Upper
< .001 210.597 362.551

0.024 -109.41 -8.235

< .001 31.005 40.265

Durbin-Watson
Statistic p

1.479 0.164

1.581 0.256
 p

< .001

 
 

95% CI

p Lower Upper

< .001 210.597 362.551

< .001 503.283 623.902

< .001 -42.407 -29.167