Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hi/,; F,
in which H is a differential operator.
Fis a known runction. and if, is the unknown scalar (or vector) function.
Two characteristics arc particularly important :
I. All these equations are linear' in the unknown runc-
tion t/f. As the easier physical and mathematical
problems are being solved, nonlinear differential
equations such as those describing shock wave
phenomena are receiving more and more attention.
The fondamental equations of atmospheric physics
are nonlinear. Turbulence, perhaps the most impor-
tant unsolved problem or classical ph ysiell. is basi-
cally nonlinear. However. both lhc nonlinear differ-
ential equations themselves and lhe numerical
lcchniqucs to which we often resort ror determining
solutions arc beyond the scope of I his book.
2 These cqualions arc ell second -order dilfcrcnl ial
equations (Maxwell's and Dirac's CQUatlons arc
first-order but in volve lwo unknown runctions.
Eliminating one unknown yields a second-order
dirrcrcntial equation for lhe 01hcr (compare Section
1.9).]
2 2
(V I tJ,
(a-'
= Ti+ ,J'
2TT.;-J ,)' ) v, = 0.
+ 7-
0 .l IX t }' C}'
We want to find the velocity of the falling parachutist as a function of time and arc panic-
ularly interesled in the constant limiting ,·elocity. t•0 • that comes about by air drag. taken.
to be quadratic. -bv 2• and opposing the force of the gravitational attraction. mg. of the
Eanh. We choose a coordinate system in which the positi\·c direction is downward so that
the gravitational force is positive. For simplicity we assume that the parachute opens im-
mediately. that is. at time/ = 0. where 11(1 = 0) = 0. our initial condition. Ncwton·s law
applied to the foiling parachutist gives
• 2
,.. • n
u ,'tJ; 0, J_,.p cJ L
- - - - - - - ~ mv= mg- bv.
where III includes the mass of the parachute.
r•-
J
\
I &j}. ,?
,
,V0 oJ ,...J
:::,.., •
J-..-......,
... \ •
The terminal velocity. t>o, can be found from the equation~ rn~tion as I --> co: when ... ¢J_, \...s) \_:,
there is no acceleration. i1= 0. so • c:f! _,,.;._sf~ - <} \
• ""a-)lp cJ u.. -
bv~ = mg. II/-., - ,,.
J ::. ""j -
'V I, --:i-;: . ,.-;' ..... ...r .,.py..;
1'f ;If' V ,.,
The variables / and u separate
dv
---=dt.
- l!. v2
~F ;;;-
g ,n
which we integrate by decomposing the denominator into panial fractions. The roots of the
denominator arc at v = ±vo. Hence -t.,,/,o;. 'I) ~\ / 6 \~
\j)
(
g- (-'- -
2v b v + vo
~)
v - vo · t/'·
'::? \
0
f ~~dt:-
Example. Boy1e·s Law
- Ji,,, x'+C..
or
In V = -lnP-r C. - - , _,,t Vr .,f,,,p =C
JI d
d)a(x) y(x)]dx =
JI a(x)q(x)dx .
The constants from a constant lower limit of integration arc lumped into the constant C.
Dividing by a (.r ). we obtain
y (x ) = [aC
t)r'·{f a (.r)q(x) d.t + C }·
r lr
Finally. substituting in Eq. (9.29) for a yields
y(x ) :::; exp[ - fJ(l )dr] exp[/' p( r) dr }1 (.1) 1/J +CI· (9.30)
ll crc the (dummy) variables of integration have been rewritten to make them unambigu•
ou~. Eq uation (9.30) is the complcti: gencrnl solution uf the linear. first-unlt:r di1Tcri:111ial
cqunt1on. Eq. (9.25). The portion
con-c~ponds 10 the c~se I/ 1r) = 0 and i~11 gcncml ~ol111ion of rhc homogeneous difTercntinl
cq uorion. The other term in Eq. (9.30),
(9.32) ,__,--
Example 9.2.2 RL CIRCUIT
w11h lhe cnnstant C hJ be dclcnnined hy nn ini1 iul condit ion (a boundary cundil mn).
For 1he spc-cin l cn,c \I (1) = \lo, n constnnl.
Now we prove the theorem that the solution of the inhomogeneous ODE is unique up
to an arbitrary multiple of the solution of the homogeneous ODE.
To show this, suppose YI. Y2 both solve the inhomogeneous ODE, Eq. (9.25); lhen
Y1 - Yi + p(x )(y , - .n l = O
follows by subtracting the ODEs nnd says that y 1 - y1 is n solution of the homogeneous
ODE. The solution of the homogeneous ODE can always be multiplied by an arbi1rnry
cunslunl.
We 11lso prove 1he theorem that II lirst-urder homogenrous ODE h11s only one linearly
independent solution. Titis is meant in the following sense. If two solutions are linearly
dependent, by definition they satisfy " YI (.r J + /J)'2(XJ = 0 with nonzero constanlrn. I, for
= =
all values of x . If the only solution of this linear relation is u 0 b, then our solu1ions
_r1 and _r2 are said to be: lint'arly independenl.
To prove 1his theorem. suppose YI . ,1'1 both solve the homogeneous ODE. Then
\' , \' ,
;J. = -p( x ) = :.l implies (9.33)
YI ,11
The runc1 ional dclcrrninant IV is called lhc Wronskian of the pair _\'I , )1- We now show
tbat )II ea Ois 1he condition for them to be lineurly dependent. Assuming linear dependence,
thal is.
11y1(.r) + bn (.r) =0
with nonzero constants a. /J for all values or x. we differcntia1c this linear relation lo gel
anuthcr linear rcla1ion.
ay j(x ) + by/ r) =0.
The condilion fur these two homogeneous linear eqlllltions in the unknowns 11, b to have a
nontrivial solution is 1ha1 Iheir de1em1inant be zero. which is W = 0.
Conversely. from W = 0, 1hcrc follows linear dependence. because we can find a non-
tri\'ial :-.olution uf 1111.: rclutinn
\' '
•I
,.'
- =•-!
."I ."2
hy intcgr:ni a n. which gi\'CS
ln1·1=In Y1 + In C. or
Linear dcrendence and 1he Wronskian arc generalized 10 1hrce or more functions in See-
1in11 I/.II.
Example.
BJ' finding a suitable intl'grori11g fact or. so/t,e 11,e folloll'ing eq11a1io11s :
- - - - - - - r· +@1, - x2)111_
The IF for this standard limn is Pt•>
;,:,,}~f ~/IC\:) = exp{/ I :\2 ,h-} = ,C$[ -)n{I - x1)] = I ~ :cl '
j 1-,,.~ )..x
t..1t
.I' . -I k
I - xl = sm x+ .
=> J = (I - x2 )(sin- 1 x + k).
..----.. µ(x)=exp{-/-c~s_x
~nx
dx} =exp[-ln(sinx)] = -.~nx
1
-.
Applying it gives
y' ycosx
sinx - sin 2 x = - sin 2 x '
.!!_ (+-) = -cosec2x,
dx smx
+-
smx
= col x +k,
y = cos x +k sin x.
e
r/ 1 dy
if µ -+ O?
)' e'I'
-di + -l - = - - -.
/( ti e•I•
c' dt J. r.e. r'
-
'. The equat ion then
y( t )
J'
= e- r/ : ---
c'i(t') e''/ 1 d ,
a
I =e
- 1/ z
X -
I
:c
e-1/l
= --.
er
For f(I) = p- 1e- ,1µH(t), with fJ < a, we have
,
(c)
t'/ 1 - 1' 1/J
y(r) = e-, 1,
1 o
e e
a{J
dt'
a-fi
As fi --> 0, /(I) hecomes very strongly pe;rked near t = 0, hut with the area
under the peak remaining constant at unity. In the limit, the input /(r) becomes
a .i-fu nction. the same as that in case (b). It can also be seen that in the same
limi t the solution y(I I for case le) tends to that for case ( b), as is to be expected.
Solve
dy
(y - x)-d
•'I'
+ 2x + 3y = 0.
We first test whether the equation is exact. or can be made so with the help ol
an integrating factor. To do this, we write the equation as
()-~) J).
ly- .\")dy + (2.t + Jy) d.t = 0
and consider
lrdx. y) = -I- [ .£ iJ
• (2x + Jy ) - ...:....(y-x) ] = -4-.
)' - X iJ_r• f' X _r - .l
I [ o i3 ] -4
lrr (X.J')= 2x+3y - c/2x+3 y)+ axly-x) = 2x + JJ
is not a function of y alone. We conclude that there is no straightforward If and
that another method has lo be tried .
W.·e note · the equation is homogeneous in x and y and so we.set y = vx , with
2
~Y = i: +x v and obtain
cx a."I:
cf'~/ )J-"O
~---- lt)-t- )(.~
®
2>
~,,.
1-
., .
a~'~ cc~-rll)
,,-
v+x~v =-2+3v,
ox V - I -,.'-\ --
av -2 - 3v - v2 + V v2 + 2v + 2 '-'d
x ox = v- I v- I ;;;:.- - (j
->SJ
dx (1-v)dv -=--le_-i-3~)
X v2 + 2v + 2 C)-\)
2 v+ 1
= (1: + J)2+ J (v+l)2+1'
a¾ j c.-i-'
= lnAx=2tan- t(v+l)-½ln[l+(v+11 2
],
Since x and J' only appear in lhe combinallon .t .;. )' we ~, r - .T .;.
dr/ dx = I + dy/ dx. The equa ti on and its solution then b~ome
dr ,
~ =l- k 4.
dx = ,,. - 4 Jr = (~ + - 2
- ) dr.
2r - 4 2 lr - 4
= .t+k -fr +l nlr - 2) =~ /.T-"-y l + lnl.t + _r - 21.
ln( x + _r- l) - k - ½tx + 3)').
Although the initia l equation mig ht look dS if it couftl be maJ e e., act wi lh ,111 I - ,v
integrating fac tor. appl) ing the m~th uJ JcscibcJ in exercise 14.J shows thal this J 11-1
not so : 0 - 1[ i' A/,'.r - ,' DN x] is neither zero nor a funct ion of only one of lhc ~v-'i _..,,,
va riables.
3'\J -"f
So/re '2.V-~
' dy
x( I - 2.ry) -_ + r = J.r,r. 1,
-~
,x
1
git•e11 that y( I ) = I / 2. c:.
These are all the same (at -2) and so the equation is isobaric.
To find its solution we se t y = vx"' = vx- 1 with
dv 2v I d11
d~ =-~+ ~dx ·
(-02v+ ~dx
I d
v) + ~ = 73.t u · 2 1
11
,·( / -ZII)
~ d t· = ~.
r(I - c) X
1
( ~ - - - ) dr = "\
V I- 1 X
9.2.1 From Kirchhoff's law the current I in an RC (resistance-capacitance) circuit (Fig. 9.1)
obeys the equation
di l
R-+-1=0.
dt C
(a) Find I (t) .
(b) For a capacitance of 10,000 JIF charged to 100 V and discharging through a resis-
tance of I MO, find the current / fort= 0 and fort= 100 seconds.
• C
Use the relationship hetween voltage and charge for a capacitor to determine A.
V= 2C
1 {00
J J1Bj~
°"
A
== C(-RC)(O - I)
== AR
Crn1s<Y111e111,ly,
V lOOV
A = 7i = lO'i O = 0.0001 amps
(--t-).
all(!
f(l) = O.fJOOI exp ]()()00
/(0) = 0.0001 amps
/(JOO):::: O.OOOO<J911m(Y.-.
The graph below shows /(t ) vs. I, the charge on Lhe cnpncil or ns a f1111clion of time.
J(t) amp
0.0001
0.00008
0.00006
0.00004
0.00002
0.0000 t sec
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000
9.2.2 The Laplace transfonn of Bessel's equation (n = 0) leads to
(s 2 + l )/'(s) + sf(s) = 0.
Solve for /(s).
Solution
Bring .,J(s) to the right sitle.
(s 2 + l)J'(.~) = -sf(s)
Divide both sides by .~ 2 + 1.
f '(.'1) = - -2-·" f (.'1)
s +l
Divide both sides by /(.'1).
The left side can be written as lhe derivative of a logarithm by the chain rule.
d 8
- ln/(s)
1
l.'1
= -- -
,'I2 + 1
11·•2+1du
= --2 -1t +C
1 1·•~+1+C
=-
2hrn
I 2
=-- lu (!l + l )+C
2
= h1 (.~2 + 1)- 1/2 + C
E:rnrn1c•11ti 111!' 110th sides.
f( s) -- e111(•2+1 )- 1/2 eC
= (i + l) - 1/2eC
,P
dN = - kN 2.
dt
This is a first-order, nonlinear differential equation. Derive the solution
-~(¾r)=-~,
Mnll.iply both sides hy -1.
!!._
,It (..!..)
N = k.
Integrate both sides wit h r,,spccl lo I .
..!._ = kt +C
N
Use the initial condition N(O) = N0 to determine C.
_!_ = C
No
T hen the prcvimL~ equation hcmmcs
= No (1 + (k;~)-1)-1
T herefore.
1
N( t) = No ( I + ..:...
t ) -
To
\\' lwrn , 11 = (/.-N11 ) - 1•
9.2.4 The rate of a particular chemical reaction A + B C is proportional to the concentra-
tions of the reactants A and B:
(a) Set ,\0 = A(O) , B0 = 11(0). Scpnrnt iug varlnblcs and usi ng a partial
fraction exp1111sion obtain
dC
n J = =J
dt nt. (.411 - C)( llo C) =
1
Bo - Ao
J(-1 _ __1_)dc.
Ao - C C llo -
m dv = -kvn.
dt
.r (I} = .r(O) + 72 -
11 (0)2-
)
11, k
11 [ ( k-t
1 - I + (n - l)..:_ v(0)11 - 1
m
) (11 - 2)/(,i - l )]
.
The ODE is exact. so there exists a potr 11t in l fu11 ctio11 'P = ,p(.c, y ) tl111t satis fi es
Di;;
or = P (.r.y) ( 1)
Di,,
-i } = Q(J·. y ). (2)
IJ
With thc>se two r<'lntionships, the OD E ciin l,p writt Pn ns
a.,
- r/.r + -D dy
o., = 0.
8.r .ti
The left sit It• is how LIi<' different inl of 9 is defin ed .
,,., = 0
l11t rgrn t,, both sides.
-., (.i;, y) = C
T lir solution to the ODE is foi111d then b_v solvi11g equations ( I) awl (2) for ,p. Start hy
~
int rg rnti nµ; ha th sides of C.'<j llation (1) pnrtinll~· with n·spcct. to,·.
9 (1·. y ) =
! P (r. 11 ) rlr + f (y )
Differentiate both sides with respect to y.
= 1.r [: (::)] I
XO } .r=r
dr + J' (y)
=
1,. -{)Q
l r.o
{) -
I
Y x=r
tlr + J (y)
I
xn .i,; I=r
= Q(.r, !f ) - Q(.Tr, . !J ) + j'(y)
Comparing this formula for 8ip/oy to equation (2) , we see that
-Q(xo ,y) + J'(y) = 0.
The arbitrary function f can be determined.
J'(y) = Q(xo, y)
Integrate both sides with respect to y.
Because C 1 is arbitrary, the lower limit of integrntiou is arbi trary as wel l. Set it t.o !JO·
1
1/
!(11) = Q(xo, s) ds + Ci
!JO
l .,
c,, is then
ip (.1; . y) = P(r, y) dr + l !J Q(:c 0. s) d8 +Ci.
• II) l/<I
f-" P(r, y) dr +
1 .z:o
J, Q(.c
11
yo
0 , .s) cl.s = constant.