You are on page 1of 17

 !3ATAKE /.

"J’RNSTADAND9)WASA

3HIBATA - (4ANAKAAND4.AKASHIZUKA3YNCHRONIZEDANNUALSEEDPRODUCTION
BYPRINCIPALTREESPECIESINATEMPERATEDECIDUOUSFOREST *APAN%COLOGY 

3CHNURR *, 23/STFELDAND$#ANHAM$IRECTANDINDIRECTEFFECTOFMASTINGON
RODENTPOPULATIONSANDTREESEEDSURVIVAL/IKOS  
3HEA +AND0#HESSON#OMMUNITYECOLOGYTHEORYASAFRAMEWORKFORBIOLOGICAL
INVASIONS4RENDSIN%COLOGYAND%VOLUTION  
3HIBATA - (4ANAKAAND4.AKASHIZUKA#AUSEANDCONSEQUENCESOFMASTSEED
PRODUCTIONOFFOURCO OCCURRING#ARPINUSSPECIESIN*APAN%COLOGY  
3ILVERTOWN * 7  4HE EVOLUTIONALY ECOLOGY OF MAST SEEDING IN TREES "IOLOGICAL
*OURNALOFTHE,INNEAN3OCIETY  
3MITH ## *,(AMRICKAND#,+RAMER4HEADVANTAGEOFMASTYEARSFORWIND
POLLINATION!MERICAN.ATURALIST  
3ORK 6 , * "RAMBLE AND / 3EXTON  %COLOGY OF MAST FRUITING IN THREE SPECIES OF
NORTH!MERICANDECIDUOUSOAKS%COLOGY  
3PERENS 5 A &RUIT PRODUCTION IN 3ORBUS AUCUPARIA , 2OSACEAE AND PRE DISPERSAL
SEED PREDATION BY THE APPLE FRUIT MOTH !RGYRESTHIA CONJUGELLA :ELL  /ECOLOGIA 
 
3PERENS 5B,ONG TERMVARIATIONIN ANDEFFECTSOFFERTILIZEDON mOWER FRUITANDSEED
PRODUCTIONINTHETREE3ORBUSAUCUPARIA2OSACEAE %COGRAPHY  
4UTIN 4' 6((EYWOOD .!"URGES $--OORE $(6ALENTINE 3-7ALTERSAND
$!7EBB&LORAEUROPAEA NDEDN#AMBRIDGE5NIVERSITY0RESS #AMBRIDGE
7OLFF */0OPULATIONmUCTUATIONSOFMAST EATINGRODENTSARECORRELATEDWITHPRO
DUCTIONOFACORNS*OURNALOF-AMMALOGY  
#HAPTERTHIRTEEN

)NVASIONSANDTHEREGULATION
OFPLANTPOPULATIONS
BYPATHOGENS

'3'ILBERTAND)-0ARKER

).42/$5#4)/.

4HEPOTENTIALOFPATHOGENSTOHAVEDRAMATICIMPACTSONPLANTPOPULATIONSISMADE
CLEARBYFAMILIARSTORIESOFTHE)RISHPOTATOFAMINE&RYAND'OODWIN THE
ECOLOGICALEXTINCTIONOFCHESTNUTSCAUSEDBYCHESTNUTBLIGHT!NAGNOSTAKIS
ANDTHETRANSFORMATIONOF!USTRALIAN*ARRAHFORESTSTOSCRUBLANDBY0HYTOPHTHORA
CINNAMOMI 7ESTE AND -ARKS   3IMILARLY THE ANNUAL WORLDWIDE EXPENDI
TUREOFOVERBILLIONINFUNGICIDEAPPLICATION$ONALDSONETAL REmECTS
THE TOLL FUNGAL PATHOGENS ALONE CAN TAKE ON PLANT GROWTH AND FECUNDITY IN
AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS 3OME OF THE MOST NOTABLE EXAMPLES OF THESE IMPACTS ARISE
WHENPATHOGENSAREINTRODUCEDINTONOVELBIOLOGICALENVIRONMENTSINVASIVEAND
EMERGENTPATHOGENSCONTINUETOFRUSTRATETHEBESTEFFORTSOFRESOURCEMANAGERS
CONSERVATION BIOLOGISTS AND PLANT PROTECTION AGENCIES 7ESTE AND -ARKS 
$AUGHTREYETAL 'OODELLETAL 'ORDONETAL -C$ONALDAND(OFF
 7INGlELDETAL 'ILBERT 2IZZOAND'ARBELOTTO 0ARKERAND
'ILBERT #ONCURRENTWITHEFFORTSTOREDUCETHEIMPACTSOFUNWANTEDDISEAS
ES THEREISBROADINTERESTAMONGRESEARCHERS AGRICULTURALISTS ANDLANDMANAGERS
TO HARNESS THE DESTRUCTIVE POTENTIAL OF PLANT PATHOGENS TO CONTROL WEEDY PLANTS
(ASANAND!YRES #HARUDATTANAND$INOOR 

-7#ADOTTE ETAL EDS #ONCEPTUALECOLOGYANDINVASIONBIOLOGY n
¥3PRINGER0RINTEDINTHE.ETHERLANDS
 '3'ILBERTAND)-0ARKER

)NNATURALECOSYSTEMS PATHOGENSHAVEGREATPOTENTIALTOINmUENCETHEDYNAM
ICS AND COMPOSITION OF PLANT POPULATIONS AND COMMUNITIES THROUGH DENSITY
DEPENDENTANDCOEVOLUTIONARYDYNAMICSSEEREVIEWSIN$INOORAND%SHED
"URDON  *AROSZ AND $AVELOS  !LEXANDER ET AL  !LEXANDER AND
(OLT  'ILBERT    )N MANY PLANT COMMUNITIES PLANT PATHOGENS
MAY PREVENT COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION AND THUS HELP MAINTAIN SPECIES DIVERSITY
'ILLETT 0ACKERAND#LAY 'ILBERT 7RIGHT 'ILBERT 
#OLLECTIVE INSIGHTS FROM RESEARCH ON EPIDEMIC DISEASES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AND
THEEVOLUTIONARYECOLOGYOFDISEASESINNATURALECOSYSTEMSPROVIDEAROBUSTBASIS
FOR IDENTIFYING WHEN PATHOGENS ARE LIKELY TO BE IMPORTANT IN REGULATING PLANT
POPULATIONS ANDTHEIRIMPLICATIONSFORUNDERSTANDINGBIOLOGICALINVASIONS
(EREWEDRAWBROADLYFROMADIVERSELITERATURETOPLACETHEREGULATIONOFPLANT
POPULATIONS BY PATHOGENS INTO THE CONTEXT OF TWO KEY COMPLEMENTARY THEORIES
ABOUTTHEROLEOFPATHOGENSINBIOLOGICALINVASIONS"IOTIC2ESISTANCE-ARONAND
6ILA AND%SCAPEFROM.ATURAL%NEMIES+EANEAND#RAWLEY 4ABLE 
7E THEN CONSIDER THE PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR USING INTRODUCED PATHOGENS FOR
CLASSICALBIOLOGICALCONTROLOFINTRODUCEDINVASIVEPLANTS4ABLE ILLUSTRATEDWITH
ADETAILEDCASESTUDYOFTHECONTROLOF#HONDRILLABYRUSTFUNGI

0,!.4$)3%!3%3!.$0/05,!4)/.2%'5,!4)/.

0ATHOGENSREDUCETHElTNESSOFINDIVIDUALPLANTSBYKILLINGTHEM REDUCINGGROWTH
IMPEDING COMPETITIVE ABILITY OR BY ROTTING FRUITS OR SEEDS SEE RECENT REVIEW IN
'ILBERT 4HEGREATERPROBABILITYOFPATHOGENSPREADBETWEENCLOSELYSPACED
HOSTPLANTSMEANSTHATMOSTFUNGALPLANTDISEASESSHOWDENSITY DEPENDENTDEVEL
OPMENT)NADDITION DENSELYSPACEDPLANTSMAYCREATEMICROCLIMATESTHATENCOUR
AGEPATHOGENGROWTH ANDHOSTSSTRESSEDBYCOMPETITIONMAYBEMORESUSCEPTIBLE
TODISEASE"URDONAND#HILVERS 'ILBERT 4HECOMBINATIONOFSTRONG
IMPACTS ON INDIVIDUAL HOST PLANTS AND DENSITY DEPENDENT DISEASE DEVELOPMENT
SUGGESTS THAT PATHOGENS SHOULD BE POWERFUL REGULATORS OF PLANT POPULATIONS
.EVERTHELESS ASIDE FROM EPIDEMICS CAUSED BY INTRODUCED PATHOGENS THERE ARE
REMARKABLY FEW EMPIRICAL STUDIES SHOWING THAT PLANT DISEASES ARE RESPONSIBLE
FOR REGULATING PLANT POPULATION DYNAMICS IN NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS 'ILBERT  
)NLARGEPARTTHISABSENCEREmECTSTHEDIFlCULTIESOFISOLATINGDISEASEIMPACTSFROM
OTHER FACTORS AND THE STRONG FOCUS ON DISEASES WITH ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE "UT
PHYSIOLOGICAL OR EVOLUTIONARY RESPONSES BY THE HOST MAY ALSO COUNTERACT THE
REGULATORYACTIONSOFPATHOGENSINNATURALECOSYSTEMS)NPARTICULAR PLANTSTHAT
SURVIVE AFTER DISEASE HAS KILLED OR STUNTED COMPETING CONSPECIlC NEIGHBORS MAY
SHOW A COMPENSATORY RESPONSE THAT OFFSETS NUMERICAL LOSSES FROM DISEASE AT THE
POPULATIONLEVEL&RIESSAND-AILLET !LEXANDERAND(OLT !LEXANDER
AND -IHAIL   )N ADDITION MATERNALLY TRANSMITTED INDUCED RESISTANCE CAN
GENERATE CROSS GENERATIONAL EFFECTS THAT AMELIORATE THE NUMERICAL IMPACTS OF
DISEASE IN SUCCEEDING GENERATIONS !GRAWAL ET AL   &INALLY THE GENETICS
4ABLE )MPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENT FEATURES OF PLANT PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS FOR THREE AREAS OF INVASION BIOLOGY THE TWO THEORIES OF BIOTIC
RESISTANCEANDESCAPEFROMNATURALENEMIES ANDTHElELDOFCLASSICALBIOLOGICALCONTROL

&EATURESOFPLANT PATHOGEN "IOTICRESISTANCE %SCAPEFROMNATURALENEMIES "IOLOGICALCONTROL
INTERACTIONS

)MPACTOFPATHOGENONHOST 0RE ADAPTEDPATHOGENSINNEW 0ATHOGENSINNATIVERANGELIMIT 4OBEEFFECTIVECONTROLAGENTS
RANGEAREHIGHLYVIRULENTON HOSTDENSITYORDISTRIBUTION PATHOGENSMUSTBEIMPORTANTIN
NAÕVEHOSTS )NTRODUCEDPLANTSLEAVE POPULATIONREGULATIONINNATIVE
VIRULENTPATHOGENSBEHIND RANGE

)NTERACTIONSWITH ,OCALPATHOGENSAREADAPTED 0LANTSMAYESCAPENATURAL )NTRODUCEDBIOCONTROLPATHOGENS


ENVIRONMENT TOLOCALENVIRONMENT ENEMIESIFINTRODUCEDINTOAN MAYFAILIFPOORLYADAPTEDTO
DISEASETRIANGLE ENVIRONMENTNOTCONDUCIVETO LOCALENVIRONMENT
DISEASEDEVELOPMENT

(OSTRANGEOFPATHOGEN 'ENERALISTPATHOGENSAREMORE !SSUMESSPECIALISTPATHOGENSPLAY /NLYSPECIALISTPATHOGENSCANBE


LIKELYTOACQUIRENEWLYINTRODUCED AUNIQUEROLEINREGULATINGPLANT UTILIZEDASCONTROLAGENTS
HOSTSPECIES POPULATIONS

.ATURALHISTORY $ENSITY DEPENDENTDISEASE 0ATHOGENSWITHRESTINGSTRUCTURES 0ATHOGENSWITHRESTINGSTRUCTURES


0LANTPOPULATIONSBYPATHOGENS

LIFEHISTORYOFPATHOGEN DEVELOPMENTMAYCHANGEIMPACT ORALTERNATELIFEHISTORYSTRATEGIES SHOULDSHOWGREATERSUCCESS


ONINVADINGHOSTSASINVASION MOSTLIKELYTOACCOMPANY
PROCEEDS INTRODUCEDPLANTSSUCHPATHOGENS
MAYHAVEGREATERVIRULENCE

2APID 0ATHOGENSMAYACQUIREINTRODUCED (OSTMAYLOSEDEFENSESTOORIGINAL (OSTMAYDEVELOPRESISTANCETO


EVOLUTIONARYCHANGES HOSTTHROUGHEVOLUTIONARYHOST PATHOGENSAFTERINTRODUCTION INTRODUCEDBIOCONTROLAGENT
SHIFT6IRULENCEMAYINCREASE
QUICKLYWHENHOSTBECOMES
COMMON


 '3'ILBERTAND)-0ARKER

OF PLANT PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS CAN BE HIGHLY DYNAMIC WITH LARGE CHANGES IN
PATHOGENVIRULENCEORHOSTRESISTANCEEVOLVINGINAFEWGENERATIONSEG "URDON
AND4HOMPSON "ISHOPETAL 3UCHRAPIDEVOLUTIONARYCHANGESARE
EXPECTEDTOSTRONGLYINmUENCETHEIMPACTOFPATHOGENSONHOSTNUMERICALDYNAM
ICS!LEXANDERETAL 

")/4)#2%3)34!.#%!.$%3#!0%&2/-.!452!,%.%-)%3

&OR DISEASE TO DEVELOP VIRULENT PATHOGENS SUSCEPTIBLE HOST PLANTS AND SUITABLE
ENVIRONMENTALCONDITIONSMUSTCONVERGECOMMONLYCALLEDTHE$ISEASE4RIANGLE 
#HANGESINANYOFTHESECOMPONENTSCANREDUCEORINCREASEHOWMUCHDISEASES
AFFECT PLANT POPULATION DYNAMICS )F PLANTS ARE INTRODUCED TO AN ENVIRONMENT
WHERE VIRULENT PATHOGENS ARE NOT PRESENT OR WHERE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
DO NOT FAVOR DISEASE DEVELOPMENT THE PLANT POPULATION MAY BE RELEASED FROM
PREVIOUS REGULATION BY PATHOGENS 3IMILARLY PLANTS INTRODUCED TO A NEW LOCALE
WITHNOVEL VIRULENTPATHOGENSORWHEREENVIRONMENTALCONDITIONSFAVORDISEASE
DEVELOPMENTMAYEXPERIENCEUNPRECEDENTEDPOPULATIONREGULATIONBYPATHOGENS
3UCHCHANGESINTHEPREVALENCEANDSEVERITYOFDISEASESUNDERDIFFERENTCONDITIONS
HAVE LONG BEEN THOUGHT TO PLAY AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN THE PROCESS OF BIOLOGICAL
INVASIONSINTWOHYPOTHETICALWAYS

)NNATURALHABITATS NATIVEPATHOGENSCOLONIZEANDAREHIGHLYVIRULENTONNAÕVE
INTRODUCEDPLANTSPECIESANDPREVENTPOPULATIONGROWTH"IOTIC2ESISTANCE 
0ATHOGENS WERE IMPORTANT IN REGULATING THE PLANT POPULATION IN ITS NATIVE
RANGE BUTARENOTINTHEINTRODUCEDRANGE%SCAPEFROM.ATURAL%NEMIES 

"IOTICRESISTANCE

4HEGREATMAJORITYOFPLANTINTRODUCTIONSDONOTRESULTININVASIONS-ACK
7ILLIAMSON 2ATHER MANYINTRODUCEDSPECIESEITHERFAILTOTHRIVEALTOGETH
ERORARERESTRICTEDTOHUMANCULTIVATION UNABLETOBUILDSELF SUSTAININGPOPULA
TIONS IN WILD PLANT COMMUNITIES OR EVEN IN DISTURBED RANGELAND COMMUNITIES
2ESEARCH ATTEMPTING TO IDENTIFY PLANT TRAITS THAT CONFER INVASIVENESS 2EICHARD
AND(AMILTON 2EJMÉNEKAND2ICHARDSON SHOWSTHATOURPREDICTIVE
ABILITY IS IMPERFECT AND IT SEEMS TO BE MORE DIFlCULT TO PREDICT WHICH INTRODUC
TIONS WILL FAIL THAN WHICH WILL SUCCEED 2EICHARD AND (AMILTON   "IOTIC
RESISTANCEISONEPOSSIBLEEXPLANATIONFORWHYSOMEINTRODUCTIONSFAILWHENTHEY
hSHOULDvSUCCEEDNATIVEPESTSANDPATHOGENSCOLONIZEEXOTICPLANTSANDELIMINATE
THEMBEFORETHEYCANESTABLISHAVIABLEPOPULATION%LTON 3IMBERLOFF
-ACK 
0ATHOGENSWILLCONTRIBUTETOBIOTICRESISTANCEONLYWHENTHREECONDITIONSARE
MET&IRST THEPATHOGENSINVOLVEDMUSTNOTBENARROWHOSTSPECIALISTS)NPLANT
COMMUNITIES WITH HIGH HOST DIVERSITY AND CORRESPONDING LOW HOST DENSITY
GENERALIST PLANT PATHOGENS SHOULD DOMINATE 'ILBERT ET AL  'ILBERT 
0LANTPOPULATIONSBYPATHOGENS 

WHICH COULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE HIGH INVASION RESISTANCE OF HYPER DIVERSE ECO
SYSTEMS LIKE TROPICAL RAIN FORESTS &INE   3ECOND BECAUSE DENSITIES OF THE
INTRODUCED HOST WILL USUALLY BE LOW IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING INTRODUCTION PATHO
GENSINVOLVEDINBIOTICRESISTANCEWOULDNOTBETHOSEFORWHICHTRANSMISSIONOR
HOSTSWITCHINGWASSTRONGLYDENSITY DEPENDENT4HIRD THEPATHOGENMUSTEXACT
A HIGH lTNESS COST ON THE HOST #OMBINATIONS OF GENERALIZATION AND HIGH VIRU
LENCEARENOTUNUSUALINPATHOGENS ESPECIALLYFORSPECIESTHATHAVELONGRESTING
STAGES OR SAPROPHYTIC ABILITY EG 0HYTOPHTHORA CINNAMOMI 6ERTICILLIUM DAHLIAE
&USARIUM OXYSPORUM  %VEN PATHOGENS THAT CAN ATTACK MANY HOSTS HAVE DIF
FERENTIAL IMPACTS ON DIFFERENT HOST SPECIES )F A PATHOGEN HAS A GREATER NEGATIVE
EFFECTONTHECOMPETITIVEABILITYOFTHENON NATIVEHOSTSTHANONTHENATIVEHOSTS
THENITWILLCONTRIBUTETOTHECOMPETITIVEEXCLUSIONOFTHENON NATIVE+EANEAND
#RAWLEY 
3INCEEVENFAIRLYSPECIALIZEDPATHOGENSOFTENINFECTMANYMEMBERSOFTHESAME
GENUS OR FAMILY IT IS LIKELY THAT THE NUMBER OF PATHOGENS COMPETENT TO INFECT A
NOVEL HOST DEPENDS ON WHETHER IT IS PHYLOGENETICALLY RELATED TO NATIVE SPECIES
ALREADYINTHECOMMUNITY4HEREFORE BIOTICRESISTANCESHOULDFAVORINVASIONBY
SPECIES WITH NO CLOSE RELATIVES $ESPITE THIS CLEAR PREDICTION AND THE ACCEPTED
PRACTICE OF USING PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS IN QUARANTINE AND TRADE POLICY TO
TARGET RELATIVES OF WEEDY PLANTS OR IDENTIFY POTENTIAL CARRIER HOSTS SURPRISINGLY
FEW STUDIES OF INVASION EVEN MENTION THE PHYLOGENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE INVADED
COMMUNITIES)NONERAREATTEMPT -ACK FOUNDTHATFOROUTOFREGIONAL
mORAS NATURALIZEDSPECIESWEREMORECOMMONINGENERAWITHNONATIVECONGENERS
THAN THOSE WITH NATIVE CONGENERS CONSISTENT WITH THE IDEA OF BIOTIC RESISTANCE
(OWEVER THISSTUDYWASNOTABLETOCONTROLFORTHEEFFECTOFOPPORTUNITYWHETHER
PLANTSWITHOUTNATIVECONGENERSHAVEAHIGHERPROBABILITYOFSUCCESSFULINVASION
GIVENTHEIRPROBABILITYOFINTRODUCTION 5SINGADIFFERENTAPPROACH $UNCANAND
7ILLIAMS COMPILEDALISTOFALLPLANTSPECIESTHATHAVEEVERBEENINTRODUCED
FOR CULTIVATION IN .EW :EALAND 4HEY FOUND THAT INTRODUCED SPECIES IN GENERA
THATALREADYHADRESIDENTNATIVESWEREMORELIKELY NOTLESSLIKELY TOSUCCESSFULLY
NATURALIZE 4HEY SUGGEST THAT SPECIES WITH NATIVE CONGENERS MAY SHARE CHARAC
TERISTICS THAT MAKE THEM MORE lT IN THE INTRODUCED RANGE AND THIS FACTOR OVER
WHELMSTHEPOTENTIALEFFECTOFLOCALNATURALENEMIES
4HERE IS A STRIKING NEED FOR MORE STUDIES TO DETERMINE WHETHER AND WHEN
BIOTIC RESISTANCE BY NATIVE PATHOGENS OCCURS "ECAUSE THERE IS LITTLE INFORMATION
ON WHERE AND WHEN UNINTENTIONAL SPECIES INTRODUCTIONS FAIL ASSIGNING MECHA
NISMS TO THESE FAILURES HAS BEEN NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE (ORTICULTURE FORESTRY AND
AGRICULTURE EACH PROVIDE EXAMPLES OF ENDEMIC PATHOGENS THAT HAVE DECIMATED
INTRODUCEDPLANTSPECIESSOTHATGROWINGTHESESPECIESISNOLONGERECONOMICALLY
VIABLE -ACK #OUTINHOETAL 7INGlELDETAL  (OWEVER EXTRA
P OLATINGFROMAGRICULTURALORSILVICULTURALEXAMPLES T O INVASIVEINTRODUCEDSPECIES
REQUIRESCAUTION SINCETHEREGENERATIONOFHOSTSISCONTROLLED PREVENTINGTHEHOST
POPULATION FROM EVOLVING RESISTANCE OR TOLERANCE TO THE PATHOGEN !DDITIONALLY
SIMPLIlEDSYSTEMSINAGRICULTUREANDFORESTRYMAYSIMPLYLACKMODERATINGEFFECTS
 '3'ILBERTAND)-0ARKER

OF GREATER BIOTIC COMPLEXITY IN LESS MANAGED SYSTEMS EG HYPERPARASITES OF
THEPATHOGENS 

%SCAPEFROMNATURALENEMIES

)NTRODUCEDPLANTSTHATBECOMEINVASIVEWEEDSAREAMONGOURMOSTCHALLENGING
ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS $!NTONIO AND 6ITOUSEK  /FlCE OF 4ECHNOLOGY
!SSESSMENT  6ITOUSEK ET AL  0ARKER ET AL  -ACK ET AL 
ANDESCAPEFROMNATURALENEMIESPROVIDESAMECHANISMTOEXPLAINTHEINCREASED
GROWTHANDDENSITYOFINTRODUCEDSPECIES$ARWIN #RAWLEY "LOSSEY
AND .ÚTZOLD  4ILMAN  -ARON AND 6ILA  3IEMANN AND 2OGERS
 +EANE AND #RAWLEY   4HE h.ATURAL %NEMIES (YPOTHESISv POSITS
THAT INTRODUCED SPECIES LEAVE BEHIND THEIR NATURAL ENEMIES ˆ HERBIVORES SEED
PREDATORS AND PATHOGENS ˆ AND ARE THEREBY RELEASED FROM A KEY REGULATING
FACTOR LEADINGTOADRAMATICINCREASEINPLANTVIGOR POPULATIONGROWTH ANDOR
COMPETITIVEABILITY4HISIDEAFORMSTHEJUSTIlCATIONFORCLASSICALBIOLOGICALCONTROL
IN WHICH NATURAL ENEMIES ARE BROUGHT FROM THE NATIVE RANGE TO CONTROL WEEDY
INVADERS (UFFAKER AND -ESSENGER  $E"ACH AND 2OSEN   9ET DESPITE
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE .ATURAL %NEMIES (YPOTHESIS RIGOROUS EMPIRICAL TESTS ARE
FEW-ARONAND6ILA 
! NUMBER OF STUDIES HAVE TESTED WHETHER INTRODUCED PLANTS TEND TO GROW
FASTERORLARGERANDWHETHERTHEREISEVIDENCEOFREDUCEDALLOCATIONTOHERBIVORE
DEFENSES IN THE NEW RANGE #RAWLEY  "LOSSEY AND .ÚTZOLD  3IEMANN
AND2OGERS BUTSEE7ILLISETAL 4HEBAUDAND3IMBERLOFF 6ILA
ETAL 7HILESEVERALOFTHESESTUDIESHAVESUGGESTEDECOLOGICALRELEASEAND
EVOLUTION AWAY FROM DEFENSE TOWARD COMPETITIVE ABILITY THEY LACK DIRECT EVI
DENCE OF INVOLVEMENT BY NATURAL ENEMIES "LOSSEY AND .ÚTZOLD  3IEMANN
AND2OGERS /THERSTUDIESHAVETESTEDTHE.ATURAL%NEMIES(YPOTHESISBY
COMPARINGTHEIMPACTOFNATURALENEMIESONEXOTICANDNATIVESPECIESWITHINTHE
INTRODUCED RANGE )N A REVIEW OF  STUDIES +EANE AND #RAWLEY  FOUND
SOME CASES IN WHICH GENERALIST HERBIVORES SHOWED HIGHER IMPACTS ON NATIVE
SPECIES THAN NON NATIVES AND OTHERS CHARACTERIZED BY THE REVERSE PATTERN
4HEREHAVEBEENSURPRISINGLYFEWSTUDIESWITHPATHOGENSINONETEST'OERGENAND
$AEHLER FOUNDTHATSMUTFUNGICAUSEDGREATERREPRODUCTIVELOSSINANATIVE
GRASS(ETEROPOGONCONTORTUS THANANINTRODUCEDGRASS0ENNISETUMSETACEUM 
%NEMY REMOVAL EXPERIMENTS ARE AN IMPORTANT BUT UNDERUTILIZED TOOL IN COM
PARING THE lTNESS EFFECT OF PATHOGENS OR HERBIVORES ON EXOTIC AND NATIVE SPECIES
WITHIN THE INTRODUCED RANGE +EANE AND #RAWLEY   "LANEY AND +OTANEN
 USEDAFUNGICIDEEXPERIMENTTOREMOVETHEEFFECTSOFSOILBORNEFUNGIAND
OOMYCETESONTHESURVIVALOFSEEDSOFNATIVEVSINTRODUCEDPLANTSINTWOHABITATS
4HEY FOUND NO SUPPORT FOR A RELEASE FROM FUNGAL PATHOGENS IN THE SEED BANK OF
EXOTIC SPECIES COMPARED WITH NATIVE SPECIES -ORE RECENTLY 0ARKER AND 'ILBERT
UNPUBLISHED DATA FOUND NO DIFFERENCE IN FREQUENCY OF INFECTION LEAF DAMAGE
lTNESSEFFECTSOFFOLIARANDDAMPING OFFPATHOGENS ORPATHOGENDIVERSITYBETWEEN
0LANTPOPULATIONSBYPATHOGENS 

SYMPATRIC SUITES OF NATIVE AND NON NATIVE CLOVERS !LTHOUGH FUNGAL EXCLUSION
EXPERIMENTSINTHISSYSTEMREVEALEDSIGNIlCANTIMPACTSOFPATHOGENS THEREWAS
NODIFFERENCEINTHERESPONSEOFNATIVEANDNON NATIVESPECIES
&INALLY OTHER STUDIES HAVE TAKEN THE APPROACH OF COMPARING DISEASE ON A
SINGLE HOST SPECIES IN ITS NATIVE AND INVADED RANGES 7OLFE  SURVEYED FOR
THE ANTHER SMUT FUNGUS -ICROBOTRYUM VIOLACEUM IN  NATIVE POPULATIONS AND
INTRODUCEDPOPULATIONSOF3ILENELATIFOLIUM(EFOUNDSIGNIlCANTLYMOREPOPU
LATIONS INFECTED AND AT MUCH HIGHER INFECTION FREQUENCIES IN THE NATIVE RANGE
THANINTHEINTRODUCEDRANGE-ITCHELLAND0OWER USEDPUBLISHEDRECORDS
OF PATHOGEN ASSOCIATIONS WITH  PLANT HOSTS IN THEIR NATIVE AND INTRODUCED
RANGES0LANTSWEREINFECTEDBYFEWERPATHOGENSPECIESINTHEIRNATURALIZED
RANGE 4HERE WAS ALSO AN INDICATION THAT SPECIES LEAVING BEHIND PROPORTIONALLY
MORENATURALENEMIESWEREMORELIKELYTOBECATEGORIZEDASNOXIOUSORINVASIVE
SPECIESBYLANDMANAGERSANDPUBLICAGENCIES5SINGANEXPERIMENTALAPPROACH
"ECKSTEADAND0ARKER DIRECTLYMEASUREDTHEDEMOGRAPHICEFFECTOFPATHO
GENSONANINVADERINTHECONTEXTOFKNOWNINFORMATIONFROMTHESPECIESNATIVE
RANGE!MMOPHILAARENARIAINITSNATIVE%UROPEISLIMITEDTOANEARLY SUCCESSIONAL
ROLEINSHIFTINGBEACHSANDSBYSOIL BORNEPATHOGENS6ANDER0UTTENETAL 
!SANINVADERONTHEWESTCOASTOFTHE53! !MMOPHILAREMAINSDOMINANTFOR
LONGPERIODSOFTIME(OWEVER ESCAPEFROMNATURALENEMIESDOESNOTEXPLAINTHIS
CONTRAST BETWEEN ITS NATIVE AND INVASIVE ECOLOGICAL ROLES "Y REPLICATING EXPERI
MENTSDONEINTHENATIVERANGE "ECKSTEADAND0ARKER FOUNDTHENEGATIVE
EFFECTOFSOILBORNEPATHOGENSONEARLYGROWTHINTHEINVADEDRANGEWASATLEASTAS
LARGEORLARGERTHANTHEIREFFECTINTHENATIVERANGE
4O PREDICT WHETHER AN INTRODUCED PLANT IS LIKELY TO BENElT FROM ESCAPING
NATURALENEMIES WENEEDTOUNDERSTANDTHERELATIVEIMPORTANCEOFHOST SPECIALIST
VS HOST GENERALIST PATHOGENS AND PESTS IN THE INVADED HABITAT -ARON AND 6ILA
 +EANE AND #RAWLEY   )F SPECIALIST PATHOGENS PREDOMINATE AND HOST
SHIFTS ARE RARE NATIVE PLANTS MAY BE SUPPRESSED MORE THAN COMPETING INVASIVE
SPECIES/NTHEOTHERHAND IFGENERALISTPATHOGENSDOMINATEINASITEANDDONOT
SHOW A PREFERENCE FOR NATIVE HOST SPECIES ONE WOULD NOT EXPECT AN INTRODUCED
PLANTTOEXPERIENCERELEASE4HEREFORE THEWIDERANGEOFRESULTSSEENINTHEABOVE
EMPIRICALSTUDIESMAYBEINPARTEXPLAINEDBYTHERELATIVEIMPORTANCEOFSPECIAL
ISTANDGENERALISTNATURALENEMIES!GREATERUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEPHYLOGENETIC
STRUCTURE OF PATHOGEN HOST RANGES COUPLED WITH ANALYSIS OF THE PHYLOGENETIC
STRUCTUREOFNATURALPLANTCOMMUNITIES7EBBETAL MAYHELPPREDICTTHE
RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF SPECIALIST VS GENERALIST PATHOGENS IN DIFFERENT KINDS OF
PLANT COMMUNITIES &OR INSTANCE IN A HIGH DIVERSITY LOWLAND TROPICAL RAINFOREST
 TREESPECIES HOSTGENERALISTSDOMINATEDTHEPOLYPOREFUNGAL COMMUNITY
ALL OF THE MORE COMMON FUNGAL SPECIES WERE FOUND ON MULTIPLE FAMILIES OF HOST
TREES'ILBERTETAL &ERRERAND'ILBERT )NCONTRAST INANEARBYLOW
DIVERSITYMANGROVEFORESTWITHONLYTHREETREESPECIESPRESENTEACHFROMADIFFER
ENT FAMILY  OF ALL POLYPORE FUNGAL COLLECTIONS BELONGED TO JUST THREE FUNGAL
SPECIES AND EACH SPECIES WAS HIGHLY SPECIALIZED ON JUST ONE MANGROVE SPECIES
 '3'ILBERTAND)-0ARKER

'ILBERT AND 3OUSA   2ESEARCHERS ARE JUST NOW BEGINNING TO ADDRESS THE
RANGEOFHOSTSPECIALIZATIONINDIFFERENTPLANTCOMMUNITIES ANDTHEWIDERANGEOF
OUTCOMESSUGGESTSTHATMANYMORESTUDIESWILLBENEEDEDBEFOREWECANFORMU
LATEPREDICTIVEGENERALIZATIONS

).4%.4)/.!,,9).42/$5#%$0!4(/'%.3&/2")/,/')#!,#/.42/,

! DIRECT APPLICATION OF THE .ATURAL %NEMIES (YPOTHESIS IS DEPLOYING NATURAL
ENEMIESFROMTHENATIVERANGEOFANINVASIVEPLANTTOCONTROLTHEINVADERPOPU
LATION 3UCH CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL USES PLANTS AND PATHOGENS WITH SHARED
EVOLUTIONARYHISTORIESBUTANEWENVIRONMENTALCONTEXT4HEREARESEVERALWAYS
INWHICHBIOLOGICALCONTROLINTERACTIONSMAYBEDIFFERENTFROMNATIVEPATHOGENS
ATTACKINGINTRODUCEDHOSTS&IRST UNLIKENATIVEPATHOGENS WHICHAREPRESUMABLY
ADAPTEDTOTHELOCALCLIMATE THEINTRODUCEDBIOLOGICALCONTROLAGENTEXPERIENCES
ANOVELENVIRONMENT WHICHCOULDHAVEALARGEIMPACTONDISEASEDEVELOPMENT
#ASESTUDIESOFFAILEDBIOLOGICALCONTROLEFFORTSPROVIDEUSWITHMANYEXAMPLESOF
THEIMPORTANCEOFTHEDISEASETRIANGLE-ORINETAL 3ECOND BOTHTHEHOST
AND PATHOGEN ARE LIKELY TO BE GENETICALLY DEPAUPERATE (OWEVER THE PATHOGEN
WILL HAVE BEEN CHOSEN SPECIlCALLY TO BE VIRULENT ON THE INVASIVE HOST PLACING
THEHOSTATARELATIVEDISADVANTAGEFOREVOLUTIONARYRESPONSES4HIRD ONLYFAIRLY
HOST SPECIlCPATHOGENSARESELECTEDFORBIOLOGICALCONTROLRELEASES MEANINGTHAT
PATHOGENNUMERICALDYNAMICSSHOULDALWAYSBECLOSELYLINKEDTOINDIVIDUALHOST
DENSITY)NFACT BIOLOGICALCONTROLRELEASESAREANEXCELLENTOPPORTUNITYTOSTUDY
FACTORSINmUENCINGNUMERICALDYNAMICS.OTONLYSHOULDTHEREBEATIGHTCONNEC
TIONBETWEENPATHOGENANDHOSTDENSITY BUTINITIALCONDITIONSOFTHEINTERACTION
ARE WELL KNOWN 4HAT IS THE HOST POPULATION IS ORIGINALLY FREE OF THAT PATHOGEN
ANDISUSUALLYATHIGHDENSITY!SUCCESSFULEPIDEMICPROVIDESANOPPORTUNITYTO
QUANTIFYBOTHFREQUENCY DEPENDENCEOFTRANSMISSIONOFTHEPATHOGENANDDENSITY
DEPENDENCEASTHEHOSTDENSITYDECLINES
0REDICTING THE SHORT TERM AND LONG TERM SUCCESS OF PARTICULAR BIOLOGICAL CON
TROL INTRODUCTIONS IS A MATTER OF OBVIOUS PRACTICAL IMPORTANCE 4O MAKE SUCH
PREDICTIONS WENEEDTOUNDERSTANDHOWTHENUMERICALDYNAMICSOFAHOSTPLANT
FOLLOWING INTRODUCTION OF ITS BIOCONTROL AGENT DEPEND ON HOST DENSITY DISEASE
INCIDENCE GENETICVARIATION ANDEVOLUTIONARYCHANGESINVIRULENCEORRESISTANCE
3URPRISINGLY WHILETHEREARESOMECASESFORWHICHWEHAVEGOODINFORMATIONON
THE DYNAMICS OF HOST NUMBERS AFTER RELEASE OF A CONTROL AGENT EG (ASAN AND
!YRES -ORRIS FORMANYOTHERRELEASESTHEDETAILSOFCHANGESARENOT
WELL DOCUMENTED )N PARTICULAR WE SHOULD ASK I IS CONTROL MORE SUCCESSFUL IN
GENETICALLYDEPAUPERATEWEEDSII $OTRANSMISSIONRATEANDDEMOGRAPHICIMPACT
OFTHEPATHOGENATTENUATEASTHEHOSTPOPULATIONDECLINESIII $OPATHOGENAND
HOSTREACHASTABLEEQUILIBRIUMORARETHEYDEPENDENTONMETAPOPULATIONDYNAM
ICS TO PERSIST IN THE LANDSCAPE $ETAILED INFORMATION ON NUMERICAL DYNAMICS IN
BIOLOGICALCONTROLSYSTEMSISSCARCE BUTDATAARENEARLYNONEXISTENTFORLONG TERM
0LANTPOPULATIONSBYPATHOGENS 

GENETIC CHANGES IN THE HOST OR PATHOGEN 4HERE IS GREAT UNTAPPED POTENTIAL FOR
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL INTRODUCTIONS TO BE USED TO UNDERSTAND THE FACTORS THAT DRIVE
THE ECOLOGICAL END EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF THE PLANT PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS
)N FACT THE ONLY BIOCONTROL STUDY WE FOUND THAT TRACKED CHANGES IN PATHOGEN
VIRULENCEORHOSTRESISTANCEFORAPLANT PATHOGENSYSTEMWASFORTHERUST0UCCINIA
CHONDRILLINAON#HONDRILLAJUNCEASEECASESTUDYBELOW 

%VOLUTIONARYECOLOGYOFBIOCONTROLWITHPATHOGENS

4HEEVOLUTIONARYDYNAMICSOFINTERACTIONSBETWEENWEEDSANDPATHOGENBIOCON
TROL AGENTS HAVE IMPORTANT IMPLICATIONS FOR THE LONG TERM SUCCESS OF BIOLOGICAL
CONTROLPROGRAMS'ENERALLY WENEEDTOKNOW I HASVIRULENCEOFTHEBIOLOGICAL
CONTROL PATHOGEN CHANGED OVER TIME AND HAS THIS INCREASED OR DECREASED THE
SUCCESSOFCONTROLII (ASTHEHOSTDEVELOPEDRESISTANCEOVERTIMEIII (ASHOST
SPECIlCITYCHANGEDOVERTIME2ECENTANALYSISOFEMERGINGDISEASESHASSUGGESTED
THATECOLOGICALHOSTSHIFTSIE HAVINGAPREADAPTEDABILITYTOUSEANEWLYENCOUN
TEREDHOST MAYPREDOMINATEASCAUSESOFNOVELEPIDEMICS ANDTHATHOSTSHIFTSMAY
ONLYRARELYBECAUSEDBYMUTATIONSTHATALLOWCOLONIZATIONOFANEWHOST3CHRAG
AND7IENER (OWEVER THEDIFlCULTYOFOBSERVINGSUCHGENETICEVENTSMAY
DISTORTOURPERSPECTIVE6AN+LINKENAND%DWARDS SYNTHESIZEDINFORMATION
ONHOSTRANGEFROMBIOLOGICALCONTROLPROGRAMSUSINGHERBIVORES4HEYFOUND
THATHOSTSHIFTSWEREMOREQUANTITATIVETHANQUALITATIVE THATIS WHILEPREFERENCE
AND EFlCIENCY ON NOVEL HOSTS EVOLVED THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTIONARY
CHANGESINFUNDAMENTALHOST RANGE3UCHANANALYSISSHOULDBEDONEFORPATHO
GENSUSEDASBIOLOGICALCONTROLAGENTS7HILEPATHOGENSAREGENERALLYTHOUGHTTO
OFFER THE OPPORTUNITY FOR HIGH HOST SPECIlCITY SOME HAVE ARGUED THAT HIGH HOST
SPECIlCITY MAY BE CORRELATED WITH EVOLUTIONARY LABILITY "ROOKS AND -C,ENNAN
 3ECORD AND +AREIVA   "ECAUSE THEY ARE UNABLE TO SIMPLY MOVE
FROMANUNACCEPTABLEHOSTTOAMORESUITABLEONEASANANIMALMIGHT SPECIALIST
PATHOGENSMAYEXPERIENCEEVENSTRONGERSELECTIONFORHOSTSHIFTSTHANHERBIVORES
2OY +NOWINGTHEFREQUENCYOFEVOLUTIONARYHOSTSHIFTSINPATHOGENSAND
UNDERSTANDINGTHECONDITIONSUNDERWHICHTHEYOCCURARECRITICALTOTHEPROCESS
OFRISKASSESSMENTINBIOLOGICALCONTROL3ECORDAND+AREIVA 
'ENERAL THEORY OF HOST PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS HAS PLAYED A LARGE ROLE IN THE
CHOICE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS IN THE PAST -C&ADYEN   &OR EXAMPLE
IT HAS LONG BEEN THOUGHT THAT SEXUALLY REPRODUCING WEEDS WOULD BE HARDER TO
CONTROL BECAUSE THEIR HIGHER LEVELS OF GENETIC VARIATION INTERFERE WITH PATHOGEN
POPULATION GROWTH "URDON ET AL   HOWEVER A MORE RECENT ANALYSIS HAS
DISPUTED THIS ASSERTION #HABOUDEZ AND 3HEPPARD   3IMILARLY THE BELIEF
THATPATHOGENPOPULATIONSARELOCALLYADAPTEDTOTHEIRHOSTGENOTYPESHASHADA
LARGEINmUENCEONTHEPROCESSOFSELECTIONOFCONTROLAGENTS WITHGENETICANALYSIS
PLAYING AN INCREASING ROLE IN THE CAREFUL MATCHING OF AGENT GENOTYPES WITH THE
POPULATIONSOFORIGINFORTHEWEEDEG (OLDENAND-AHLBERG (OWEVER
THE EVIDENCE FOR CLOSE LOCAL ADAPTATION OF PATHOGENS TO THEIR HOST POPULATIONS IS
 '3'ILBERTAND)-0ARKER

MIXED ANDINFACTRESISTANCEANDGENE FOR GENEVIRULENCESHOULDmUCTUATEINAN


ASYNCHRONOUS FREQUENCY DEPENDENTWAYREVIEWEDIN0ARKERAND'ILBERT 
"IOLOGICALCONTROLPRACTITIONERSHAVECLEARLYBASEDTHEIRINTRODUCTIONSTRATEGIESON
THEORETICALCONSIDERATIONS BUTTHESIMPLERRULESARENOWCOMINGUNDERQUESTION
-C&ADYEN   4HERE IS A NEED FOR CLEAR PREDICTIONS AND MODERN EMPIRICAL
WORK TESTING THOSE PREDICTIONS TO HELP INFORM THE PRACTICE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
FORTHEFUTURE

!NEVOLUTIONARYECOLOGYCASESTUDYˆ#HONDRILLAAND0UCCINIA
ONTHREECONTINENTS

.O SYSTEM OF CLASSICAL BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF A WEED BY A PATHOGEN DEMONSTRATES
THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ENVIRONMENT GENETICS AND NUMERICAL
DYNAMICS AS WELL AS THAT OF #HONDRILLA JUNCEA RUSH SKELETONWEED !STERACEAE 
.ATIVETO%URASIA THISSPECIESWASINTRODUCEDTOTHEEASTERN5NITED3TATESINTHE
LATES TO!USTRALIAINTHEEARLYS ANDTOTHEWESTERN5NITEDSTATESIN
THE S -C6EAN  0RYOR  3CHIRMAN AND 2OBOCKER  3UPKOFF
ET AL   #HONDRILLA IS A SIGNIlCANT ECONOMIC PROBLEM IN WHEAT GROWING
REGIONS 0ANETTA AND $ODD  AND IS ALSO A WIDESPREAD RANGELAND WEED
/FTHREEBIOCONTROLAGENTSTHATWEREINTRODUCED 0UCCINIACHONDRILLINAWASTHEMOST
EFFECTIVEATREDUCINGPLANTVIGOR3UPKOFFETAL ANDWITHINTWODECADESOF
ITSINTRODUCTIONINTO!USTRALIAAND#ALIFORNIA #HONDRILLADENSITIESWEREREDUCEDTO
THOSETYPICALINITSNATIVERANGE7APSHEREETAL #ULLENETAL 3UPKOFF
ETAL 
4HEEXTREMEHOSTSPECIlCITYFOUNDINTHE#HONDRILLA0UCCINIASYSTEMMAKESTHIS
EXAMPLE PARTICULARLY INTERESTING (ASAN   #HONDRILLA IS A TRIPLOID APOMICT
ANDTHUSREPRODUCTIONISCLONAL)N!USTRALIA THREECLONALTYPESAREPRESENT EACH
WITHADIFFERENTLEAFWIDTH0CHONDRILLINACAUSESDISEASEONLYONTHENARROW LEAF
TYPE 4HE ORIGINAL INFESTATION OF #HONDRILLA WAS PRIMARILY THIS NARROW LEAF TYPE
BUTAFTERTHESUCCESSFULBIOCONTROLOFTHATCLONE THEINTERMEDIATE LEAVEDCLONEHAS
SPREAD(ANLEYAND'ROVES .OWTHEREISCONCERTEDEFFORTTOINTRODUCENEW
STRAINSOF0UCCINIACHONDRILLINATHATAREABLETOATTACKANDCONTROLTHEOTHERCLONES
OF#HONDRILLA(ANLEYAND'ROVES 
)N WESTERN .ORTH !MERICA THREE DIFFERENT #HONDRILLA GENOTYPES WERE FOUND
DISTINGUISHABLE BY THEIR MULTI LOCUS ISOZYME PHENOTYPES (ASAN ET AL  
TWOGENOTYPESARETHOUGHTTOHAVEORIGINATEDIN9UGOSLAVIA(ASANAND$ELFOSSE
  4HE WESTERN 53 GENOTYPES WERE LARGELY RESISTANT TO THE RUST STRAIN THAT
CONTROLLEDTHENARROW LEAF#HONDRILLAIN!USTRALIA SOADDITIONALRUSTISOLATESWERE
EVALUATED FOR USE IN BIOCONTROL 2USTS COLLECTED FROM 9UGOSLAVIA THE PUTATIVE
SITEOFORIGINOFTHE53INVADERS SHOWEDHIGHVIRULENCEONSOMEOFTHE53GENO
TYPES BUT OTHER PLANTS WERE LITTLE AFFECTED )N ADDITION RUSTS FROM OTHER REGIONS
ALSO SHOWED HIGH VIRULENCE 'ENETIC MATCHING OF HOSTS BETWEEN THE NATIVE AND
INTRODUCED RANGE MAY YIELD WELL ADAPTED BIOCONTROL PATHOGENS WHEN THE TARGET
WEEDISGENETICALLYUNIFORM BUTTHISAPPROACHASSUMESHIGHLOCALADAPTATIONOF
0LANTPOPULATIONSBYPATHOGENS 

THEPATHOGENTOTHEHOST!SMENTIONEDABOVE SUCHLOCALADAPTATIONMAYNOTBE
GENERALLYFOUNDINNATURALPOPULATIONS
3EXUAL REPRODUCTION IN BOTH THE HOST AND PATHOGEN PLAY A ROLE IN THIS STORY
4ELIOSPORESOF0CHONDRILLINAONLYGERMINATEAFTERCOLDWINTERS!DAMSAND,INE
 SO SEXUAL RECOMBINATION OF THE PATHOGEN OCCURS READILY ONLY IN COLDER
REGIONS SUCHASPARTSOFEASTERNCONTINENTAL%UROPE)NTHESEAREASOFTHENATIVE
RANGE #HONDRILLA ALSO SHOWS HIGHER CLONAL DIVERSITY AND POSSIBLY DIPLOID SEXUAL
POPULATIONS #HABOUDEZ AND 3HEPPARD   )NTERESTINGLY POPULATIONS OF
#HONDRILLAWITHHIGHVSLOWCLONALDIVERSITYINTHENATIVERANGEAPPEARTOSUFFER
SIMILAR DEGREES OF RUST INFECTION #HABOUDEZ AND 3HEPPARD   )N NORTHERN
.ORTH!MERICA WHERECOLDWINTERSALLOWFORSEXUALRECOMBINATIONOFTHEPATHO
GEN THEEVOLUTIONARYDYNAMICSOFTHEHOST PATHOGENINTERACTIONAREPOTENTIALLY
MORECOMPLEX(ASANETAL )N!USTRALIA THEYAREPARTICULARLYCONCERNED
ABOUT THE POSSIBILITY OF INTRODUCTION OF NEW SEXUAL TYPES OF #HONDRILLA WHICH
COULDRESULTINASITUATIONWHERETHEHOSTREPRODUCESSEXUALLYBUTTHEPATHOGEN
CANNOT#HABOUDEZAND3HEPPARD 
4HIS EXAMPLE SHOWS THE IMPORTANCE OF THE hDISEASE TRIANGLEv INTERACTION
BETWEEN HOST PATHOGEN AND ENVIRONMENT IN THE DYNAMICS OF PLANT PATHOGEN
INTERACTIONS 4HE CASE OF #HONDRILLA0UCCINIA
CHONDRILLINA IS ONE OF THE FEW FOR
WHICH WE HAVE SUCH DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT THE HOSTS AND THE PATHOGENS
GENETIC MAKEUP AND MORE IMPORTANTLY ABOUT HOW THE INTERACTION HAS PLAYED
OUTINANUMBEROFDIFFERENTREGIONS0ATHOGENBIOLOGICALCONTROLCASESOFFERTHE
POTENTIAL TO LEARN A GREAT DEAL ABOUT THE ROLES OF GENETICS NUMERICAL DYNAMICS
EVOLUTIONARYDYNAMICS ANDENVIRONMENTALFACTORSINDETERMININGTHELONG TERM
OUTCOMESOFHOST PATHOGENINTERACTIONS

#/.#,53)/.3

&ROMTHESTUDIESDESCRIBEDABOVE ITAPPEARSTHATPATHOGENSARESOMETIMESIMPOR
TANT IN THE REGULATION OF NATURAL PLANT POPULATIONS MAY CONSTRAIN POPULATIONS
INTRODUCEDTONEWREGIONS ANDMAY BYTHEIRABSENCE RELEASEINTRODUCEDPLANTS
FROMANIMPORTANTSOURCEOFREGULATION7ESUGGESTTWOKEYDIRECTIONSTHATWOULD
MOSTADVANCEOURUNDERSTANDINGOFTHEIMPORTANCEOFPATHOGENSINPLANTPOPULA
TIONREGULATIONANINTEGRATIONOFNUMERICALANDEVOLUTIONARYDYNAMICSFORBOTH
THEPATHOGENSANDPLANTS ANDAGREATERBREADTHOFSTUDIESTOINCLUDEMOREPLANT
PATHOGENSYSTEMS
"IOLOGICALCONTROLOFINVASIVEWEEDSOFFERSEXCITINGOPPORTUNITIESTOEVALUATETHE
IMPORTANCEOFPATHOGENSINNUMERICALREGULATIONOFPLANTPOPULATIONS ANDATTHE
SAMETIMETOFOLLOWGENETICCHANGESINPLANTANDPATHOGENPOPULATIONS#AREFUL
MONITORING FOR CHANGES IN HOST AND PATHOGEN GENOTYPES ALONG WITH NUMERI
CALDYNAMICS SHOULDBEINTEGRALTOANYINTRODUCTIONOFPATHOGENSFORBIOLOGICAL
CONTROL OF INVASIVE WEEDS %QUALLY IMPORTANT WE MUST MOVE BEYOND SPINNING
NARRATIVESANDMAKINGGENERALPREDICTIONSFROMAHANDFULOFEXAMPLES7EHAVE
 '3'ILBERTAND)-0ARKER

AGOODIDEAOFTHEROLEPATHOGENSSHOULDPLAYINPLANTPOPULATIONREGULATIONAND
BIOLOGICALINVASIONS4ABLE WENOWNEEDTOCOLLECTDATAFROMADIVERSITYOFSYS
TEMSTOEVALUATEOURPREDICTIONS(OWOFTENANDUNDERWHATCONDITIONSAREPLANT
PATHOGENSSIGNIlCANTFORCESINREGULATINGWILDPLANTPOPULATIONSINTHEIRNATIVE
RANGES(OWOFTENDOINTRODUCEDPLANTSFAILTOESTABLISHBECAUSETHEYAREATTACKED
BY LOCAL PATHOGENS (OW OFTEN IS ESCAPE FROM PATHOGENS A KEY TO DETERMIN
ING WHETHER AN INTRODUCED PLANT INVADES NATURAL HABITATS 4HROUGH PATHOGEN
EXCLUSION AND ADDITION EXPERIMENTS COMMON GARDENS PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF
HOST RANGES ANALYSIS OF RAPID EVOLUTIONARY CHANGES IN PLANT PATHOGEN INTERAC
TIONS AND CAREFUL CREATIVE NATURAL HISTORY OF PLANT DISEASES WE WILL ILLUMINATE
THEROLEOFPLANTPATHOGENSINBIOLOGICALINVASIONS

!#+./7,%$'-%.43

7E THANK " !YALA + $LUGOSCH * (AGEN # (AYS " (ARDCASTLE * (EIN
2(UFFT 3,AMBRECHT 3,ANGRIDGE -,OS(UERTOS $0LANTE 73ATTERTHWAITE
9 3PRINGER AND TWO ANONYMOUS REVIEWERS FOR HELPFUL DISCUSSIONS AND CRITICAL
COMMENTS ON DRAFTS OF THIS MANUSCRIPT 0REPARATION WAS SUPPORTED IN PART BY
.3& GRANTS $%"  TO )-0 $%"  AND $%"  TO '3'
AND53$! .2) TO)-0

2%&%2%.#%3

!DAMS % " AND 2 & ,INE  "IOLOGY OF 0UCCINIA CHONDRILLINA IN 7ASHINGTON
0HYTOPATHOLOGY  
!GRAWAL ! #,AFORSCHAND24OLLRIAN4RANSGENERATIONALINDUCTIONOFDEFENCESIN
ANIMALSANDPLANTS.ATURE  
!LEXANDER ( - AND 2 $ (OLT  4HE INTERACTION BETWEEN PLANT COMPETITION AND
DISEASE0ERSPECTIVESIN0LANT%COLOGY %VOLUTION AND3YSTEMATICS  
!LEXANDER ( - AND * $ -IHAIL  3EEDLING DISEASE IN AN ANNUAL LEGUME CONSE
QUENCES FOR SEEDLING MORTALITY PLANT SIZE AND POPULATION SEED PRODUCTION /ECOLOGIA
  
!LEXANDER ( - 0 ( 4HRALL * !NTONOVICS ! - *AROSZ AND 0 6 /UDEMANS 
0OPULATIONS DYNAMICS AND GENETICS OF PLANT DISEASE ! CASE STUDY OF ANTHER SMUT DIS
EASE%COLOGY  
!NAGNOSTAKIS 3,#HESTNUTBLIGHTTHECLASSICALPROBLEMOFANINTRODUCEDPATHOGEN
-YCOLOGIA  
"ECKSTEAD *AND)-0ARKER)NVASIVENESSOF!MMOPHILAARENARIA2ELEASEFROMSOIL
BORNEPATHOGENS%COLOGY  
"ISHOP *' !-$EANAND4-ITCHELL /LDS2APIDEVOLUTIONINPLANTCHITINASES
MOLECULARTARGETSOFSELECTIONINPLANT PATHOGENCOEVOLUTION0ROC.ATL!CAD3CI53!
  
0LANTPOPULATIONSBYPATHOGENS 

"LANEY #3AND0-+OTANEN%FFECTSOFFUNGALPATHOGENSONSEEDSOFNATIVEAND
EXOTICPLANTS!TESTUSINGCONGENERICPAIRS*!PPL%COL  
"LOSSEY " AND 2 .ÚTZOLD  %VOLUTION OF INCREASED COMPETITION ABILITY IN INVASIVE
NONINDIGENOUSPLANTSAHYPOTHESIS*OURNALOF%COLOGY  
"ROOKS $2AND$!-C,ENNAN0ARASCRIPTPARASITESANDTHELANGUAGEOFEVOLU
TION3MITHSONIAN)NSTITUTION0RESS 7ASHINGTON
"URDON * *  $ISEASES AND 0LANT 0OPULATION "IOLOGY #AMBRIDGE 5NIVERSITY 0RESS
#AMBRIDGE
"URDON * * AND ' ! #HILVERS  (OST DENSITY AS A FACTOR IN PLANT DISEASE ECOLOGY
!NNUAL2EVIEWOF0HYTOPATHOLOGY  
"URDON * * 2 ( 'ROVES AND * - #ULLEN  4HE IMPACT OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL ON
THEDISTRIBUTIONANDABUNDANCEOF#HONDRILLAJUNCEAINSOUTH EASTERN!USTRALIA*OURNAL
OF!PPLIED%COLOGY  
"URDON * * AND * . 4HOMPSON  #HANGED PATTERNS OF RESISTANCE IN A POPULATION
OF ,INUM MARGINALE ATTACKED BY THE RUST PATHOGEN -ELAMPSORA LINI *OURNAL OF %COLOGY
  
#HABOUDEZ 0AND!73HEPPARD!REPARTICULARWEEDSMOREAMENABLETOBIOLOGI
CALCONTROLˆARE ANALYSISOFMODEOFREPRODUCTIONANDLIFEHISTORY0AGES IN
% 3 $ELFOSSE AND 2 2 3COTT EDITORS "IOLOGICAL #ONTROL OF 7EEDS 0ROC 6)))TH )NT
3YMP"IOL#ONTR7EEDS#3)2/0UBLICATIONS -ELBOURNE !USTRALIA
#HARUDATTAN 2AND!$INOOR"IOLOGICALCONTROLOFWEEDSUSINGPLANTPATHOGENS
!CCOMPLISHMENTSANDLIMITATIONS#ROP0ROTECTION  
#OUTINHO 4 ! - * 7INGlELD ! # !LFENAS AND 0 7 #ROUS  %UCALYPTUS RUST
A DISEASE WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR SERIOUS INTERNATIONAL IMPLICATIONS 0LANT $ISEASE 
 
#RAWLEY -*7HAT-AKESA#OMMUNITY)NVASIBLE0AGES IN!*'RAY
- * #RAWLEY AND 0 * %DWARDS EDITOR "RITISH %COLOGICAL 3OCIETY 3YMPOSIUM 6OL
 #OLONIZATION 3UCCESSION AND 3TABILITY "LACKWELL 3CIENTIlC 0UBLICATIONS /XFORD
%NGLAND
#ULLEN * - 2 ( 'ROVES AND * & !LEX  4HE INmUENCE OF !CERIA CHONDRILLAE ON
THE GROWTH AND REPRODUCTIVE CAPACITY OF #HONDRILLA JUNCEA *OURNAL OF !PPLIED %COLOGY
  
$!NTONIO # - AND 0 - 6ITOUSEK  "IOLOGICAL INVASIONS BY EXOTIC GRASSES
THEGRASSlRECYCLEANDGLOBALCHANGE!NNUAL2EVIEWOF%COLOGYAND3YSTEMATICS
 
$ARWIN #/NTHEORIGINOFSPECIESBYMEANSOFNATURALSELECTION OR 4HEPRESERVA
TIONOFFAVOUREDRACESINTHESTRUGGLEFORLIFE*-URRAY ,ONDON
$AUGHTREY - , # 2 (IBBEN + / "RITTON - 4 7INDHAM AND 3 # 2EDLIN 
$OGWOOD!NTHRACNOSEUNDERSTANDINGADISEASENEWTO.ORTH!MERICA0LANT$ISEASE
  
$E"ACH 0 AND $ 2OSEN  "IOLOGICAL CONTROL BY NATURAL ENEMIES #AMBRIDGE
5NIVERSITY0RESS #AMBRIDGE
$INOOR ! AND . %SHED  4HE ROLE AND IMPORTANCE OF PATHOGENS IN NATURAL PLANT
COMMUNITIES!NNUAL2EVIEWOF0HYTOPATHOLOGY  
 '3'ILBERTAND)-0ARKER

$ONALDSON $ 4 +IELY AND ! 'RUBE  0ESTICIDES )NDUSTRY 3ALES AND 5SAGE 
AND-ARKET%STIMATES/FlCEOF0ESTICE0ROGRAMS 53%NVIRONMENTAL0ROTECTION
!GENCY 7ASHINGTON $#
$UNCAN 20AND0!7ILLIAMS$ARWINSNATURALIZATIONHYPOTHESISCHALLENGED
.ATURE  
%LTON #34HE%COLOGYOF)NVASIONSBY!NIMALSAND0LANTS-ETHUEN ,ONDON
&ERRER !AND'3'ILBERT%FFECTOFTREEHOSTSPECIESONFUNGALCOMMUNITYCOMPOSI
TIONINATROPICALRAINFORESTINPANAMA$IVERSITYAND$ISTRIBUTIONS  
&INE 06!4HEINVASIBILITYOFTROPICALFORESTSBYEXOTICPLANTS*OURNALOF4ROPICAL
%COLOGY  
&RIESS .AND*-AILLET)NmUENCEOFCUCUMBERMOSAICVIRUSINFECTIONONTHEINTRA
SPECIlC COMPETITIV ABILITY AND lTNESS OF PURSLANE 0ORTULACA OLERACEA  .EW 0HYTOLOGIST
  
&RY 7%AND3"'OODWIN2ESURGENCEOFTHE)RISHPOTATOFAMINEFUNGUSAFTER
YEARS THELATEBLIGHTFUNGUSISAGAINMENACINGFARMERS"IOSCIENCE  
'ILBERT '3%VOLUTIONARYECOLOGYOFPLANTDISEASESINNATURALECOSYSTEMS!NNUAL
2EVIEWOF0HYTOPATHOLOGY  
'ILBERT ' 3  4HE DIMENSIONS OF PLANT DISEASE IN TROPICAL FORESTS 0AGES  
IN$2&0"URSLEM -!0IINARDAND3(ARTLEY EDITORS"IOTIC)NTERACTIONSINTHE
4ROPICS#AMBRIDGE5NIV0RESS #AMBRIDGE
'ILBERT '3 !&ERRERAND*#ARRANZA0OLYPOREFUNGALDIVERSITYANDHOSTDENSITY
INAMOISTTROPICALFOREST"IODIVERSITYAND#ONSERVATION  
'ILBERT '3AND703OUSA(OSTSPECIALIZATIONAMONGWOOD DECAYPOLYPOREFUNGI
INA#ARIBBEANMANGROVEFOREST"IOTROPICA  
'ILLETT * "  0EST PRESSURE AN UNDERESTIMATED FACTOR IN EVOLUTION 3YSTEMATICS
!SSOCIATION0UBLICATION.UMBER  
'OERGEN % AND # $AEHLER  )NmORESCENCE DAMAGE BY INSECTS AND FUNGI IN NATIVE
PILI GRASS (ETEROPOGON CONTORTUS VERSUS ALIEN FOUNTAIN GRASS 0ENNISETUM SETACEUM IN
(AWAII0ACIlC3CIENCE  
'OODELL + )-0ARKERAND'3'ILBERT"IOLOGICALIMPACTSOFSPECIESINVASIONS
)MPLICATIONS FOR POLICY MAKERS 0AGES   IN * #ASWELL EDITOR )NCORPORATING
"IOLOGICAL .ATURAL AND 3OCIAL 3CIENCES IN 3ANITARY AND 0HYTOSANITARY 3TANDARDS IN
)NTERNATIONAL4RADE.ATIONAL!CADEMY0RESS 7ASHINGTON $#
'ORDON 42 !*3TORERAND$,7OOD4HE0ITCH#ANKEREPIDEMICIN#ALIFORNIA
0LANT$ISEASE  
(ANLEY - % AND 2 ( 'ROVES  %FFECT OF THE RUST FUNGUS 0UCCINIA CHONDRILLINA
45ONPLANTSIZEANDPLANTSIZEVARIABILITYIN#HONDRILLAJUNCEA7EED2ESEARCH
 
(ASAN 3  3PECIlCITY AND HOST SPECIALIZATION OF 0UCCINIA CHONDRILLINA !NNALS OF
!PPLIED"IOLOGY  
(ASAN 3 AND 0 ' !YRES  4ANSLEY 2EVIEW .O  4HE CONTROL OF WEEDS THROUGH
&UNGI0RINCIPLESANDPROSPECTS.EW0HYTOLOGIST  
(ASAN 3 0 #HABOUDEZ AND # %SPIAU  )SOZYME PATTERNS AND SUSCEPTIBILITY OF
.ORTH !MERICAN FORMS OF #HONDRILLA JUNCEA TO %UROPEAN STRAINS OF THE RUST FUNGUS
0LANTPOPULATIONSBYPATHOGENS 

0UCCINIACHONDRILLINA0AGES IN%3$ELFOSSEAND223COTT EDITORS"IOLOGICAL


CONTROLOFWEEDS#3)2/0UBLICATIONS %AST-ELBOURNE 6ICTORIA !USTRALIA
(ASAN 3 AND % 3 $ELFOSSE  3USCEPTIBILITY OF THE !USTRALIAN NATIVE (ELIOTROPIUM
CRISPATUM TOTHERUSTFUNGUS5ROMYCESHELIOTROPIIINTRODUCEDTOCONTROLCOMMONHELIO
TROPE (ELIOTROPIUMEUROPAEUM"IOCONTROL3CIENCEAND4ECHNOLOGY  
(OLDEN !.'AND0'-AHLBERG2USTSFORTHEBIOLOGICALCONTROLOFLEAFYSPURGE
%UPHORBIA ESULA IN .ORTH !MERICA 0AGES   IN % 3 $ELFOSSE AND 2 2 3COTT
EDITORS "IOLOGICAL CONTROL OF WEEDS #3)2/ 0UBLICATIONS %AST -ELBOURNE 6ICTORIA
!USTRALIA
(UFFAKER #"AND03-ESSENGER EDITORS4HEORYANDPRACTICEOFBIOLOGICALCON

TROL!CADEMIC0RESS .EW9ORK
*AROSZ ! - AND ! , $AVELOS  %FFECTS OF DISEASE IN WILD PLANT POPULATIONS AND
THEEVOLUTIONOFPATHOGENAGGRESSIVENESS.EW0HYTOLOGIST  
+EANE 2 - AND - * #RAWLEY  %XOTIC PLANT INVASIONS AND THE ENEMY RELEASE
HYPOTHESIS4RENDSIN%COLOGYAND%VOLUTION  
-ACK 2 .  5NDERSTANDING THE PROCESSES OF WEED INVASIONS THE INmUENCE OF
ENVIRONMENTAL STOCHASTICITY IN # ( 3TIRTON EDITOR 7EEDS IN A #HANGING 7ORLD
"RITISH#ROP0ROTECTION#OUNCIL "RIGHTON 5+
-ACK 2."IOTICBARRIERSTOPLANTNATURALIZATION0AGES IN6#-ORANAND
*((OFFMANN EDITORS0ROCEEDINGSOFTHE)8)NTERNATIONAL3YMPOSIUMON"IOLOGICAL
#ONTROLOF7EEDS5NIVERSITYOF#APE4OWN 3TELLENBOSCH 3OUTH!FRICA
-ACK 2 . $ 3IMBERLOFF 7 - ,ONSDALE ( %VANS - #LOUT AND & ! "AZZAZ 
"IOTIC INVASIONS #AUSES EPIDEMIOLOGY GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES AND CONTROL %COLOGICAL
!PPLICATIONS  
-ARON * , AND - 6ILA  7HEN DO HERBIVORES AFFECT PLANT INVASION %VIDENCE FOR
THENATURALENEMIESANDBIOTICRESISTANCEHYPOTHESES/IKOS  
-C$ONALD ' ) AND 2 * (OFF  "LISTER RUST AN INTRODUCED PLAGUE 0AGES  
IN $ & 4OMBACK 3 & !RNO AND 2 % +EANE EDITORS 7HITEBARK 0INE #OMMUNITIES
%COLOGYAND2ESTORATION)SLAND0RESS 7ASHINGTON$#
-C&ADYEN 2%#"IOLOGICALCONTROLOFWEEDS!NNUAL2EVIEWOF%NTOMOLOGY
 
-C6EAN $.%COLOGYOF#HONDRILLAJUNCEA,INSOUTHEASTERN!USTRALIA*OURNALOF
%COLOGY  
-ITCHELL # % AND ! ' 0OWER  2ELEASE OF INVASIVE PLANTS FROM FUNGAL AND VIRAL
PATHOGENS.ATURE  
-ORIN , !"!AND3(%2USTEPIDEMICS CLIMATEANDCONTROLOF8ANTHIUMOCCIDEN
TALE0AGES  IN 6#-ORANAND*((OFFMANN EDITORS0ROCTH)NT3YMP
"IOL#ONTROL7EEDS5NIV#APE4OWN0RESS 3TELLENBOSCH
-ORRIS -*)MPACTOFTHEGALL FORMINGRUSTFUNGUS5ROMYCLADIUMTEPPERIANUMON
THEINVASIVETREE!CACIASALIGNAIN3OUTH!FRICA"IOLOGICAL#ONTROL  
/FlCE OF 4ECHNOLOGY !SSESSMENT  (ARMFUL .ON )NDIGENOUS 3PECIES IN THE 5NITED
3TATES/4! &  53#ONGRESS
0ACKER !AND+#LAY3OILPATHOGENSANDSPATIALPATTERNSOFSEEDLINGMORTALITYIN
ATEMPERATETREE.ATURE  
 '3'ILBERTAND)-0ARKER

0ANETTA & $ AND * $ODD  #HONDRILLA JUNCEA 0AGES   IN 2 ( 'ROVES 2 #
( 3HEPHERD AND 2 ' 2ICHARDSON EDITORS 4HE "IOLOGY OF !USTRALIAN 7EEDS 6OL 
2ICHARDSON -ELBOURNE !USTRALIA
0ARKER ) - AND ' 3 'ILBERT  4HE EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY OF NOVEL PLANT PATHOGEN
INTERACTIONS!NNUAL2EVIEWOF%COLOGY %VOLUTION AND3YSTEMATICS  
0ARKER ) - $ 3IMBERLOFF 7 - ,ONSDALE + 'OODELL - 7ONHAM 0 - +AREIVA
- ( 7ILLIAMSON " 6ON (OLLE 0 " -OYLE * % "YERS AND , 'OLDWASSER 
)MPACT 4OWARD A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING THE ECOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF INVADERS
"IOLOGICAL)NVASIONS  
0RYOR - 2  3KELETONWEED CONTROL 0AGES   IN TH !NNUAL #ALIFORNIA 7EED
#ONFERENCE#ALIFORNIA7EED#ONFERENCE 3ACRAMENTO #ALIFORNIA
2EICHARD 3(AND+(AMILTON0REDICTINGINVASIONSOFWOODYPLANTSINTRODUCED
INTO.ORTH!MERICA#ONSERVATION"IOLOGY
2EJMÉNEK -AND$-2ICHARDSON7HATATTRIBUTESMAKESOMEPLANTSPECIESMORE
INVASIVE%COLOGY  
2IZZO $ - AND - 'ARBELOTTO  3UDDEN OAK DEATH ENDANGERING #ALIFORNIA AND
/REGONFORESTECOSYSTEMS&RONTIERSIN%COLOGYANDTHE%NVIRONMENT  
2OY "!0ATTERNSOFASSOCIATIONBETWEENCRUCIFERSANDTHEIRmOWER MIMICPATHO
GENS (OST JUMPS ARE MORE COMMON THAN COEVOLUTION OR COSPECIATION %VOLUTION 
 
3CHIRMAN 2 AND 7 # 2OBOCKER  2USH SKELETONWEED –THREAT TO DRYLAND AGRICUL
TURE7EEDS  
3CHRAG 3*AND07IENER%MERGINGINFECTIOUSDISEASEWHATARETHERELATIVEROLES
OFECOLOGYANDEVOLUTION4RENDSIN%COLOGY%VOLUTION  
3ECORD $ AND 0 +AREIVA  0ERILS AND PITFALLS IN THE HOST SPECIlCITY PARADIGM
"IOSCIENCE  
3IEMANN % AND 7 % 2OGERS  'ENETIC DIFFERENCES IN GROWTH OF AN INVASIVE TREE
SPECIES%COLOGY,ETTERS  
3IMBERLOFF $)NTRODUCEDINSECTSABIOGEOGRAPHICANDSYSTEMATICPERSPECTIVE0AGES
 IN(!-OONEYAND*!$RAKE EDITORS%COLOGYOF"IOLOGICAL)NVASIONSOF.ORTH
!MERICANAND(AWAII3PRINGER 6ERLAG .EW9ORK
3UPKOFF $ - $ " *OLEY AND * * -AROIS  %FFECT OF INTRODUCED BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
ORGANISMS ON THE DENSITY OF #HONDRILLA JUNCEA IN #ALIFORNIA 53! *OURNAL OF !PPLIED
%COLOGY  
4HEBAUD #AND$3IMBERLOFF!REPLANTSREALLYLARGERINTHEIRINTRODUCEDRANGES
!MERICAN.ATURALIST  
4ILMAN $  4HE ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF CHANGES IN BIODIVERSITY A SEARCH FOR
GENERALPRINCIPLES%COLOGY  
6AN DER 0UTTEN 7 ( # 6AN $IJK AND " ! - 0ETERS  0LANT SPECIlC SOIL BORNE
DISEASESCONTRIBUTETOSUCCESSIONINFOREDUNEVEGETATION.ATURE  
VAN+LINKEN 2$AND/2%DWARDS)SHOST SPECIlCITYOFWEEDBIOLOGICALCONTROL
AGENTSLIKELYTOEVOLVERAPIDLYFOLLOWINGESTABLISHMENT%COLOGY,ETTERS  
6ILA - ! 'OMEZ AND * , -ARON  !RE ALIEN PLANTS MORE COMPETITIVE THAN THEIR
NATIVECONSPECIlCS!TESTUSING(YPERICUMPERFORATUM,/ECOLOGIA  

You might also like