You are on page 1of 27

)NVASIVEPLANT

SOILECOSYSTEMFEEDBACKS 

6ERSFELD $ " AND " 3 VAN 7ILGREN  )MPACT OF WOODY ALIENS ON ECOSYSTEM PROP
ERTIES 0AGES   IN ) ! 7 -ACDONALD & * +RUGER AND ! ! &ERRAR EDICTORS
4HE ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS IN SOUTHERN !FRICA /XFORD
5NIVERSITY0RESS #APE4OWN 3OUTH!FRICA
6ITOUSEK 0 -  "IOLOGICAL INVASIONS AND ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES CAN SPECIES MAKE
A DIFFERENCE 0AGES   IN ' ! -OONEY AND * ! $RAKE EDITORS %COLOGY OF
"IOLOGICAL)NVASIONSOF.ORTH!MERICAAND(AWAII3PRINGER 6ERLAG .EW9ORK .9
6ITOUSEK 0-"IOLOGICALINVASIONSANDECOSYSTEMPROCESSESTOWARDSANINTEGRA
TIONOFPOPULATIONBIOLOGYANDECOSYSTEMSTUDIES/IKOS  
6ITOUSEK 0-AND,27ALKER"IOLOGICALINVASIONBY-YRICAFAYAIN(AWAIIPLANT
DEMOGRAPHY NITROGENlXATION ECOSYSTEMEFFECTS%COLOGICAL-ONOGRAPHS  
6ITOUSEK 0 - , 2 7ALKER , $ 7HITEAKER $ -UELLER $OMBOIS AND 0 ! -ATSON
 "IOLOGICAL INVASION BY -YRICA FAYA ALTERS ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT IN (AWAII
3CIENCE  
6IVANCO * - ( 0 "AIS & 2 3TERMITZ ' # 4HELEN AND 2 - #ALLAWAY 
"IOGEOGRAPHICALVARIATIONINCOMMUNITYRESPONSETOROOTALLELECHEMISTRYNOVELWEAP
ONSANDEXOTICINVASION%COLOGY,ETTERS  
9ELENIK 3' 7$3TOCKAND$-2ICHARDSON%COSYSTEMLEVELIMPACTSOFINVASIVE
!CACIASALIGNAINTHE3OUTH!FRICANFYNBOS2ESTORATION%COLOGY  
9PSILANTIS 72ISKOFCHEATGRASSINVASIONAFTERlREINSELECTEDSAGEBRUSHCOMMU
NITYTYPES53"UREAUOF,AND-ANAGEMENT
7ARDLE $ ! + 3 .ICHOLSON AND ! 2AHMAN  %COLOGICLA EFFECTS OF THE INVASIVE
WEED SPECIES 3ENECIO JACOBAEA , RAGWORT IN A .EW :EALAND PASTURE !GRICULTURE
%COSYSTEMS AND%NVIRONMENT  
7ARDLE $ ! AND + 3 .ICHOLSON  3YNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF GRASSLAND PLANT SPECIES
ON SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS AND ACTIVITY IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ECOSYSTEM LEVEL EFFECTS OF
ENRICHEDPLANTDIVERSITY&UNCTIONAL%COLOGY  
7ARDLE $ ! + 3 .ICHOLSON - !HMED AND ! 2AHMAN  )NTERFERENCE EFFECTS OF
THE INVASIVE PLANT #ARDUUS NUTANS , AGAINST THE NITROGEN lXATION ABILITY OF 4RIFOLIUM
REPENS,0LANTAND3OIL  
7ARDLE $! -.ILSSON #'ALLETAND/:ACKISSON!NECOSYSTEM LEVELPERSPECTIVE
OFALLELOPATHY"IOLOGICAL2EVIEW  
7ATKINS .+ !(&ITTER *$'RAVES#ARBONTRANSFERBETWEEN#AND#PLANTS
LINKEDBYACOMMONMYCORRHIZALNETWORK QUANTIlEDUSINGSTABLECARBONISOTOPES3OIL
"IOLOGYAND"IOCHEMISTRY  
7ATKINSON ! 2  4HE ROLE OF THE SOIL COMMUNITY IN PLANT POPULATION DYNAMICS
4RENDSIN%COLOGYAND%VOLUTION  
7EST (-)NmUENCEOFARBUSCULARMYCORRHIZALINFECTIONONCOMPETITIONBETWEEN
(OLCUSLANATUSAND$ACTYLISGLOMERATA*OURNALOF%COLOGY  
7ESTOVER +- !#+ENNEDYAND3%+ELLEY0ATTERNSOFRHIZOSPHEREMICROBIAL
COMMUNITYSTRUCTUREASSOCIATEDWITHCO OCCURRINGPLANTSPECIES*OURNALOF%COLOGY
 
#HAPTERSIXTEEN

)NVASIONBIOLOGYASA
COMMUNITYPROCESSMESSAGES
FROMMICROBIALMICROCOSMS
0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

).42/$5#4)/.

)NVASIONS ARE WIDELY REGARDED AS A SIGNIlCANT CURRENT PROBLEM IN POPULATION
ECOSYSTEMANDHABITATMANAGEMENT WITHCONSEQUENCESINCLUDINGGLOBALHOMOG
ENIZATIONOFmORASANDFAUNAS EXTIRPATIONOFNATIVESPECIESANDINTERFERENCEWITH
ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING $RAKE ET AL  7ILLIAMSON  -ACK ET AL 
0IMENTELETAL 3AKAIETAL 3UCHINVASIONSOCCUR ANDHAVEEFFECTS AT
LARGESCALES INREALECOSYSTEMS3OWHYCONSIDERINVESTIGATINGSUCHPHENOMENA
INARTIlCIALMICROCOSMSYSTEMSINTHELABORATORY7EBELIEVETHATTHEREARESEV
ERALCOMPELLINGREASONSWHYLABORATORYMICROCOSMSYSTEMSHAVEAVALUABLEROLE
IN THE STUDY OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS THESE CENTRE ON THE ISSUES OF MANIPULATION
TIMESCALEANDREPLICATION
&IRST APPLIED ECOLOGY SEEKS A PREDICTIVE UNDERSTANDING OF INVASIONS WHAT
DETERMINESWHICHSPECIESWILLMAKESUCCESSFULINVADERS!RESOMETYPESOFCOM
MUNITIESINVASIONPRONE(OWWILLANINVADERIMPACTONACOMMUNITY4HEREARE
VARIOUSTHEORETICALEXPECTATIONS BUTTESTINGTHESEINTHElELDISLARGELYDEPENDENT
ONEXTRACTINGSTATISTICALSIGNALSFROMDOCUMENTATIONOFTHE@NATURALEXPERIMENTS
THAT REAL INVASIONS PROVIDE /PPORTUNITIES FOR CONTROLLED EXPERIMENTATION ARE

-7#ADOTTE ETAL EDS #ONCEPTUALECOLOGYANDINVASIONBIOLOGY n
¥3PRINGER0RINTEDINTHE.ETHERLANDS
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

LIMITEDAND IT ISNOTORIOUSLYDIFlCULT TODOCUMENT


SYSTEMATICALLY
INVASION
ATTEMPTS

THATFAIL3IMBERLOFF ˆTHENECESSARY@CONTROLFOREVALUATIONOFTHEDETER
MINANTS OF INVASION SUCCESS -ICROCOSMS MESOCOSMS AND RELATED TECHNIQUES
SUCHASENCLOSUREEXPERIMENTS PROVIDETHEPOSSIBILITYOFMANIPULATINGPOTENTIAL
INmUENCES ON INVASION SUCCESS ALBEIT AT THE EXPENSE OF REALISM IN COMPLEXITY
ANDSCALING
3ECOND INVASIONSTAKETIME4HEPOPULATIONDYNAMICSOFANINVADINGSPECIES
ITS GEOGRAPHIC SPREAD AND THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE RECEIVING COMMUNITIES ARE ALL
TYPICALLY EXPRESSED OVER TENS TO HUNDREDS OF GENERATIONS USUALLY TAKING MANY
YEARS (OWEVER DESIRABLE THE EXPLORATION OF SUCH EFFECTS IN INVASIONS CURRENTLY
HAPPENINGINTHElELDMAYBEIMPRACTICAL-ICROCOSMSYSTEMSUTILIZINGMICROOR
GANISMS ALLOW@LONGTERMEFFECTSANDOUTCOMES INTHERANGEOFTENSTOHUNDREDS
OFGENERATIONS TOBEDOCUMENTED$RAKEETAL ,AWLER 
4HIRD AS THE WEALTH OF CASE STUDIES IN THE INVASIONS LITERATURE TESTIlES INVA
SIONSARERATHERINDIVIDUALISTICEVENTSˆAPARTICULARINVADER INVADINGAPARTICU
LARSYSTEM ORREGION UNDERPARTICULARCIRCUMSTANCES4HISMAKESTHEAPPRAISALOF
GENERALPATTERNSANDCAUSESDIFlCULT)NPARTICULAR IFWEAREINTERESTEDINPREDIC
TION ORATLEASTPREDICTABILITY THENITBECOMESIMPORTANTTOKNOWTHEPROBABILITY
OFAPARTICULAROUTCOMEFORWHATIS AFTERALL APROCESSLIKELYTOBESTRONGLYINmU
ENCEDBYSTOCHASTICEVENTS)NEXPERIMENTALSYSTEMS REPLICATIONOFCOMMUNITIES
AND INVASION EVENTS MAKES IT POSSIBLE TO ASSESS THE VARIATION IN THE OUTCOME OF
INVASIONS ANDTHESOURCEOFTHATVARIATION
!BEAKERINTHELABORATORYISFARFROMAlELDEXPERIMENTINANATURALECOSYSTEM
3PATIALANDTEMPORALSCALES THETYPESOFORGANISMSINVOLVEDANDTHESIMPLICITYOF
THECOMMUNITIESMEANTHATMICROCOSMSCANNOTSIMPLYBETAKENASANALOGUESOF
LARGENATURALECOSYSTEMSTHESAMEISTRUEFOROTHERSORTSOFMICROCOSMANDMESO
COSMEXPERIMENTS0ETERSENAND(ASTINGS !MICROBIALMICROCOSMISBETTER
THOUGHTOFASASMALLSYSTEMINITSOWNRIGHTANDWITHITSOWNPECULIARITIES RATHER
THANASALARGESYSTEMWRITSMALL)NASENSE DECIDINGTHEEXTENTTOWHICHRESULTS
FROM MICROCOSMS CAN BE APPLIED TO OTHER TYPES OF SYSTEM IS EQUIVALENT TO DECID
INGTHEEXTENTTOWHICHRESULTSFROMANYONETYPEOFCOMMUNITYCANBEAPPLIED
TO OTHER DISPARATE SYSTEMS FOR INSTANCE THE EXTENT TO WHICH RESULTS FROM PHYTO
PLANKTONCOMMUNITIESCANBEAPPLIEDTOFORESTS-ICROCOSMSOFPROTISTSCERTAINLY
TELLUSSOMETHINGABOUTTHEBEHAVIOUROFMICROBIALCOMMUNITIES BUTLEAVEOPEN
OPENTHEQUESTIONOFWHETHERSUCHBEHAVIOURGENERALIZESTHELATTERISALSOTRUEFOR
EXPERIMENTSONFORESTSANDPHYTOPLANKTON
-ICROCOSMS CANNOT OF COURSE REPLACE LARGE SCALE lELD EXPERIMENTS ON SPE
CIlCECOYSTEMS/NLYTHROUGHSUCHEXPERIMENTSCANSOMEOFTHECOMPLEXITYAND
SPECIlCFEATURESOFTHESYSTEMOFINTERESTBECAPTURED(OWEVER LARGE SCALElELD
EXPERIMENTSAREOFTENCONCERNEDWITHTESTINGGENERALPRINCIPLESSUCHASTHEROLES
OF SPECIES RICHNESS OR SPECIES TYPE EG 7ARDLE  (ECTOR ET AL  AND
THE EFFECTS OF mUCTUATION OR HETEROGENEITY IN THE ABIOTIC ENVIROMENT EG $AVIS
AND 0ELSOR   1UESTIONS ABOUT HOW TO GENERALIZE TO OTHER KINDS OF SYSTEM
APPLY AS MUCH IN THESE lELD EXPERIMENTS AS IN MICROCOSMS -ANY IMPORTANT
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

ECOLOGICALPRINCIPLESCAN BETESTEDINMICROCOSMSASWELLASINlELDEXPERIMENTSEG
0ETCHEY ET AL  AND WE TAKE THE VIEW THAT MICROSOSM EXPERIMENTS SHOULD
COMPLEMENTTHESEOTHERAPPROACHES RATHERTHANBEINGALTERNATIVESTOTHEM
!RGUABLYTHEREFORE LABORATORYMICROCOSMSHAVEAUSEFULROLETOPLAYININVESTI
GATINGECOLOGICALPRINCIPLESOFINVASION JUSTASTHEYHAVEPROVIDEDVALUABLEINVES
TIGATIVETOOLSINOTHERAREASOFCOMMUNITYECOLOGY,AWLER )NFACT MANY
OF THE PROCESSES HYPOTHESIZED TO BE DETERMINANTS OF INVASION SUCCESS OR IMPACT
AREJUSTTHOSEOF@NATURALCOMMUNITYCHANGEANDREGULATIONPOPULATIONGROWTH
SPECIES INTERACTIONS DISPERSAL TROPHIC POSITION ASSEMBLY ETC $IAMOND AND
#ASE 3HEAAND#HESSON )TISINTHESTUDYOFTHESEGENERALPROCESSES
RATHERTHANINTHESTUDYOFFACTORSMORESPECIlCTOTHEBIOGEOGRAPHYOFINVASION
FOREXAMPLETHELOSSOFCOEVOLVEDNATURALENEMIES4ORCHINETAL -ITCHELL
AND0OWER THATLABORATORYMICROCOSMSAREMOSTLIKELYTOGENERATEUSEFUL
INSIGHTS
(ERE WE EXAMINE VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF INVASION BIOLOGY AND SOME OF THE
INSIGHTSLABORATORYMICROCOSMSHAVEGIVENUSINTOTHESE7EFOCUSONMICROCOSMS
OFHETEROTROPHICMICROBES WHICHWEKNOWBESTFROMOUROWNWORK ANDWHICH
HAVE A LONG HERITAGE IN DIVERSE AREAS OF COMMUNITY ECOLOGY EG SEE REVIEWIN
,AWLER /URREASONFORTHISISTHATSUCHSYSTEMSEXPLOITALLTHEADVANTAGES
OFMICROCOSMSLISTEDABOVE BUTITDOESMEANTHATWEDONOTCOVEROTHERTYPESOF
EXPERIMENTALINVASIONS SUCHASTHOSEOFPLANTSINTOCOMMUNITIESINPOTS ORSIMI
LAREXPERIMENTALSYSTEMSEG$UKES 3TAMPEAND$AEHLER $ICKETAL
 WHICH ARE SOMETIMES TERMED MICROCOSMS VALUABLE THOUGH SUCH EXPERI
MENTSAREFORINVESTIGATINGTHEDETAILSANDMECHANISMSOFPARTICULARINVASIONS

!.).6!3)/.%80%2)-%.4

)NDEVELOPINGTHEIDEASBELOW WEDRAWSUBSTANTIALLYONINFORMATIONFROMMICRO
COSMEXPERIMENTSONINVASIBILITYWHICHWECONDUCTEDASPARTOFASTUDYOFCOM
MUNITYASSEMBLY7EATHERBYETAL,AWETAL7ARRENETAL 
4HEREAREANUMBEROFRESULTSTHATEMERGEFROMTHISWORKWHICHWEFEELAREBOTH
PERTINENTTOQUESTIONSABOUTINVASIONSINGENERAL ANDALSOILLUSTRATIVEOFSOMEOF
THEAREASINWHICHMICROCOSMSSYSTEMSCANCONTRIBUTEUNIQUELYTOUNDERSTAND
INGINVASIONPROCESSES&ULLDETAILSOFTHEEXPERIMENTALMETHODSCANBEFOUNDIN
THEPAPERSABOVE BUTABRIEFOUTLINEOFTHEEXPERIMENTSISGIVENHERE FORCONVE
NIENCE
7E WORKED WITH A SPECIES POOL OF SIX HETEROTROPHIC PROTISTS BACTERIOVORES
4ETRAHYMENA PYRIFORMIS #OLPIDIUM STRIATUM 0ARAMECIUM CAUDATUM AN OMNIVORE
"LEPHARISMA JAPONICUM PREDATORS %UPLOTES PATELLA !MOEBA PROTEUS PLUS A MIXED
BACTERIALASSEMBLAGE INMICROCOSMSCONTAININGM,OFLIQUIDMEDIUM)NAN
INITIALEXPERIMENT7EATHERBYETAL ALLPOSSIBLECOMBINATIONSOFTHESPECIES
WERETESTEDFORTHEIRABILITYTOCOEXISTOFTHEPOSSIBLECOMBINATIONSOFSPECIES
TEN FORMED PERSISTENT COMMUNITIES ON A TIME SCALE OF TENS TO HUNDREDS OF
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

GENERATIONS  7E THENTOOK EACHOFTHESEPERSISTENTCOMMUNITIESANDCHALLENGED


THEMEXPERIMENTALLYWITHEACHNON RESIDENTSPECIES3IXREPLICATESOFEACHCOMBI
NATION OF COMMUNITY AND INTRODUCED SPECIES WERE USED STARTING FROM A PRE
ESTABLISHED RESIDENT COMMUNITY SET UP FOR WEEKS ANDCHALLENGINGITWITHAN
INOCULUM OF THE NEW SPECIES CONSISTING OF THIRTY INDIVIDUALS 4HE INITIAL RATE
OFINCREASEOF THEINVADER ITSLONGTERMPERSISTENCE
UP T OWEEKS AFTER
INVASION

ANDTHE CHANGES INCOMMUNITYCOMPOSITION WEREALLRECORDED

&!#4/23!&&%#4).'%34!",)3(-%.4/&).6!$%23

%STABLISHMENTASAPROBABILISTICEVENT

#HANCEPLAYSANIMPORTANTPARTINWHETHERANEWSPECIESGETSESTABLISHEDLOCALLY
#RAWLEY %VENIFANEWSPECIESHASVITALRATESTHATENABLEITTOINCREASEON
THE AVERAGE RANDOM EVENTS CAN CATCH UP WITH IT BEFORE IT IS ABLE TO GET STARTED
3UCHEVENTSINCLUDEDEMOGRAPHICSTOCHASTICITY ENVIRONMENTALSTOCHASTICITY AND
THE EXACT STATE OF THE RESIDENT COMMUNITY AT THE TIME WHEN THE NEW SPECIES IS
INTRODUCED
)TTHEREFOREHELPSTOTHINKOFESTABLISHMENTASAPROBABILISTICEVENT4HEORYFROM
STOCHASTICBIRTH DEATHPROCESSESPROVIDESAQUANTITATIVEFRAMEWORKONWHICHTO
BUILDIDEAS ATLEASTSOFARASDEMOGRAPHICSTOCHASTICITYISCONCERNED"AILEY
  'OEL AND 2ICHTER $YN   4HIS THEORY CONSIDERS A POPULATION IN
WHICHINDIVIDUALSHAVEACONSTANTPROBABILITYPERUNITTIMEOFGIVINGBIRTHBAND
OFDYINGD WITHANASSUMPTIONTHATBD)FTHEPOPULATIONSTARTSWITHANINOCU
LUMOFNINDEPENDENTINDIVIDUALS ITHASAPROBABILITY

nDB N
0N . 
nDB .

OF REACHING SIZE .  N BEFORE IT GOES TO EXTINCTION &OR A SPECIES INTRODUCED
INTO A WELL MIXED COMMUNITY CLOSE TO STEADY STATE AND AT AN ABUNDANCE MUCH
LOWERTHANTHERESIDENTSPECIES BANDDMAYBETAKENASAPPROXIMATELYCONSTANT
DURINGTHEEARLYSTAGESOFPOPULATIONGROWTH BECAUSEMOSTINTERACTIONSAREWITH
THERESIDENTSPECIES.CANBESETATAVALUEABOVETHELEVELATWHICHDEMOGRAPHIC
STOCHASTICITY IS IMPORTANT TO GIVE AN EXPRESSION FOR THE PROBABILITY THAT A NEW
SPECIESBECOMESSUCCESSFULLYESTABLISHED

0N nDB NnnRB N 

WHERE R  B n D IS THE INITIAL PER CAPITA RATE OF INCREASE OF THE NEW SPECIES AND
B  D 0N   IF B  D  0LOTTING THIS FUNCTION SHOWS AS ONE WOULD EXPECT
THE SPECIES IS MORE LIKELY TO BECOME ESTABLISHED THE GREATER THE INOCULUM SIZE
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

N AND THE GREATER THE PER CAPITA RATE OF INCREASE R RELATIVE TO THE BIRTH RATE B
OR EQUIVALENTLY THE SMALLER THE DEATH RATE D RELATIVE TO THE BIRTH RATE B &IG  
SEE#HAPTERBY&RECKLETONETALFORABROADERDISCUSSIONOFTHEROLEOFSTOCHASTIC
ITYININVASIONS

&IG 0ROBABILITY0N THATANINTRODUCED ASEXUALSPECIESREACHESASIZEABOVEALEVEL


AT WHICH DEMOGRAPHIC STOCHASTICITY IS IMPORTANT STARTING WITH N PROPAGULES AND HAVING
CONSTANTPERCAPITABIRTHBANDDEATHDRATESWITHRBnD4HESURFACEISCONSTRUCTEDFROM
%QUATION

!LTHOUGHTHEROLETHATCHANCEPLAYSINESTABLISHMENTOFNEWSPECIESISRARELY
ASUBJECTOFDIRECTEXPERIMENTATION WEFOUNDITPLAYEDANIMPORTANTPARTINTHE
REPLICATEINVASIONTRIALSWECARRIEDOUTDURINGOURWORKONCOMMUNITYASSEMBLY
OFPROTISTS,AWETAL )NTHISWORK WETOOKASPECIESTOHAVEBECOMEESTAB
LISHEDIFITREACHEDATHRESHOLDOFINDIVIDUALSATSOMESTAGEDURINGTHECOURSEOF
THEEXPERIMENT(OWEVER INABOUTOFTHERESIDENT INTRODUCTIONTREATMENTS
THEOUTCOMEREMAINEDUNCERTAININTHESENSETHATTHEINTRODUCEDSPECIESBECAME
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

ESTABLISHEDINSOMEREPLICATESWHILEDISAPPEARINGINOTHERS&IG $EMOGRAPHIC
STOCHASTICITY MOST LIKELY PLAYED A PART IN THIS ALTHOUGH THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE
INVOLVEMENT OF OTHER FACTORS AS WELL &OR INSTANCE SPECIES THAT REMAIN AT LOW
POPULATION SIZES FOR LONG PERIODS OF TIME ARE ALSO VULNERABLE TO THE CONTINUING
EFFECTSOFENVIRONMENTALSTOCHASTICITY ASINTWOOFOURMICROCOSMSWHERENEITHER
EXTINCTION NOR THE THRESHOLD FOR ESTABLISHMENT HAD BEEN REACHED BY THE TIME
THEEXPERIMENTENDEDWEEKSAFTERINOCULATION!LSO THEEXACTABUNDANCEOF
THE RESIDENT SPECIES AT THE TIME OF INTRODUCTION WHICH WE COULD NOT CONTROL FOR
IN OUR INVASION TRIALS COULD INmUENCE THE OUTCOME 3UCH EFFECTS OF ABUNDANCE
ARE SUGGESTED BY THE FACT THAT THE OUTCOME OF INVASIONS WAS NEVER IN DOUBT IN
OUR MICROCOSMS LACKING RESIDENT PROTISTS BUT WAS UNCERTAIN IN ABOUT A THIRD OF
THE TREATMENTS CONTAINING RESIDENT PROTISTS $RAKE  IN MICROCOSMS OF
ALGAE AND GRAZING MICROCRUSTACEA SUGGESTED A POSSIBLY SIMILAR EFFECT WHERE
SMALL VARIATIONS IN INITIAL DEMOGRAPHY OF INTRODUCED GRAZERS AMONG REPLICATES
CAUSEDMARKEDVARIATIONINGRAZERPOPULATIONSUCCESSINSOMECOMMUNITIES BUT
NOTINOTHERS

&IG 5NCERTAINTY IN THE OUTCOME OF RESIDENT INTRODUCTION TREATMENTS IN A PROTIST
INVASION EXPERIMENT DESCRIBED IN ,AW ET AL   4REATMENTS ARE SHOWN IN THREE
CATEGORIES ACCORDING TO WHETHER THE INTRODUCED SPECIES FAILED TO ESTABLISHPERSIST IN ALL
REPLICATES SUCCEEDED IN ESTABLISHINGPERSISTING IN ALL REPLICATES OR SUCCESSFULLY INVADED
SOME BUTFAILEDINOTHERSMIXED "ARSSHOWTHENUMBEROFTREATMENTSFALLINGINTOEACH
CATEGORY3HADEDBARSESTABLISHMENTREACHINGATHRESHOLDOFINDIVIDUALSATSOMEPOINT
INTHEEXPERIMENT OPENBARSPERSISTENCESTILLPRESENTINTHECOMMUNITYAFTERWEEKS 
-OSTTREATMENTSHADREPLICATESTHOUGHAFEWONLYHAD OR
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

0ROPAGULEPRESSUREANDTHEPROBABILITYOFESTABLISHMENT

4HERE IS A GENERAL UNDERSTANDING THAT ESTABLISHMENT OF A NEW SPECIES IS MORE
LIKELY THE MORE INDIVIDUALS INTRODUCED AT A TIME 7ILLIAMSON  +OLA AND
,ODGE )TISINTUITIVE FORINSTANCE THATDEMOGRAPHICSTOCHASTICITYSHOULD
HAVEITSGREATESTEFFECTONESTABLISHMENTOFASPECIESWHENJUSTAFEWINDIVIDUALS
AREINTRODUCEDBECAUSEASEQUENCEOFRELATIVELYFEWDEATHSCANTAKETHENEWPOPU
LATION TO EXTINCTION !LTHOUGH RATHER LITTLE IS KNOWN ABOUT PROPAGULE PRESSURE
THISMAYWELLCONTRIBUTEINIMPORTANTWAYSTOPATTERNSOFINVASIONSOBSERVEDIN
NATURE7ILLIAMSONETSEQ,ONSDALE !MONGTHEMOSTSYSTEMATIC
INVESTIGATIONS HAVE BEEN THE RELEASE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS EG (OPPER
AND2OUSH WHERETHEREISPARTICULARCONCERNTOENSURETHECONTROLAGENTS
BECOMESUCCESSFULLYESTABLISHED3HEAAND0OSSINGHAM %QUATIONABOVE
PROVIDESACLEARQUANTITATIVEPREDICTIONABOUTTHEEFFECTOFINOCULUMSIZENONTHE
PROBABILITYOFSUCCESSFULESTABLISHMENT
4HE QUANTITATIVE DEPENDENCE OF INVASION SUCCESS ON PROPAGULE PRESSURE HAS
RECEIVED LITTLE SYSTEMATIC EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION 7ELL MIXED MICROCOSMS
CONTAININGSPECIESWITHSHORTGENERATIONTIMES WOULDBEAGOODPOINTATWHICH
TOBEGINEXAMININGTHISRELATIONSHIP

)NITIALRATEOFINCREASEANDTHEPROBABLITYOFESTABLISHMENT

/NE WOULD EXPECT THAT THE LARGER THE PER CAPITA RATE OF INCREASE OF A RARE INTRO
DUCEDSPECIES THEGREATERTHELIKELIHOODTHATITBECOMESESTABLISHED!PARTFROM
HUMANPATHOGENSEG !NDERSONAND-AY  RATHERLITTLEINFORMA
TIONISAVAILABLEONTHISINITIALRATEOFINCREASE9ET ITISINTUITIVETHATAHIGHRATE
OF INCREASE SHOULD ALLOW EARLY ESCAPE FROM THE REGION IN WHICH DEMOGRAPHIC
STOCHASTICITYCOULDDRIVETHEINTRODUCEDSPECIESTOEXTINCTION%QUATIONMAKES
THISINTUITIONPRECISE SHOWINGTHATWHATACTUALLYMATTERSISTHERATIOOFTHEDEATH
RATETOBIRTHRATE THERATIOLEADINGTOADIMENSIONLESSEXPRESSIONINDEPENDENTOF
THETIMESCALEONWHICHTHEDYNAMICSAREOPERATING
-ICROCOSMS BECAUSE OF THEIR POTENTIAL FOR HIGH LEVELS OF REPLICATION PROVIDE
SCOPE FOR STUDYING INITIAL RATES OF INCREASE AND THE PROBABILITY OF ESTABLISHMENT
/UR STUDIES OF PROTIST MICROCOSMS ,AW ET AL  ILLUSTRATE THE POTENTIAL TO
ESCAPE FROM STOCHASTIC EXTINCTION THROUGH RAPID POPULATION GROWTH &IG  
4HE GRAPHS SHOW THE GROWTH OF "LEPHARISMA POPULATIONS EACH STARTING WITH AN
INOCULUM OF  INDIVIDUALS INTRODUCED INTO FOUR DIFFERENT TYPES OF MICROCOSM
THOSECONTAINING0ARAMECIUM #OLPIDIUMOR4ETRAHYMENA ANDTHOSEWITHNOOTHER
PROTISTS 7HEN FACED WITH 0ARAMECIUM MOST "LEPHARISMA POPULATIONS DECLINED
RAPIDLYINFACT TWOWEREEXTINCTBYDAYSIX7ITH#OLPIDUM "LEPHARISMATEETERED
ALONG AT SMALL POPULATION SIZES DURING THIS TIME THERE WOULD BE A CONTINUING
RISKOFEXTINCTION)NTHEPRESENCEOF4ETRAHYMENA "LEPHARISMAPOPULATIONSGREW
MUCHFASTERANDSOONGOTBEYONDASIZEATWHICHEXTINCTIONTHROUGHDEMOGRAPHIC
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

&IG 4IME SERIES OF THE EARLY GROWTH OF POPULATIONS OF "LEPHARISMA INTRODUCED INTO
ESTABLISHED POPULATIONS OF A 0ARAMECIUM B #OLPIDIUM C 4ETRAHYMENA D NO OTHER
PROTISTS TAKEN FROM AN EXPERIMENT DESCRIBED IN ,AW ET AL   )N EACH CASE SIX
INDEPENDENTREPLICATEINTRODUCTIONSOFINDIVIDUALSARESHOWN

STOCHASTICITY COULD BE AN ISSUE 4HE BEHAVIOUR OF "LEPHARISMA IN THE ABSENCE OF
ANYPROTISTSWASSIMILAR ALTHOUGHTHEGROWTHRATEWASSOMEWHATSMALLER
)NVASIONBIOLOGYWOULDBERELATIVELYSTRAIGHTFORWARDIFECOLOGISTSCOULDPOINTTO
BIOLOGICALPROPERTIESOFSPECIESTHATMAKETHEIRINITIALRATESOFINCREASEEITHERPOSI
TIVEORNEGATIVE THOUGHSUCCESSINDOINGTHISHASGENERALLYBEENMIXED7ILLIAMSON
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

 -ACK +OLAAND,ODGE 4HERESULTSON"LEPHARISMAABOVEARE


ALSO NOT ENCOURAGING IN THIS REGARD BECAUSE SUCCESS WAS CLEARLY CONTINGENT ON
PROPERTIES OF THE RESIDENT COMMUNITY .ONETHELESS OUR STUDIES DID SHOW SOME
LARGE D IFFERENCES AMONG INTRODUCED SPECIES IN THE INITIAL RATESOFINCREASE,AW
ET AL  )TWASSTRIKINGTHAT THEBACTERIOVORE0ARAMECIUMWASCONSTITUTIVELYA
STRONGINVADER WHATEVERRESIDENTCOMMUNITYITENCOUNTERED4HEREAREEVIDENTLY
FEATURESOF0ARAMECIUMTHATPREDISPOSEITTOGROWESPECIALLYWELLINMICROCOSMS
EVENWHENITSEEMSLIKELYTOBEINCOMPETITIONFORRESOURCESWITHOTHERSPECIES

2ESIDENTCOMMUNITYANDTHEPROBABILITYOFESTABLISHMENT

!LTHOUGHCERTAINSPECIESMIGHTBECONSTITUTIVELYGOODORBADINVADERS INGENERAL
ITISMOREREALISTICTOENVISAGEINVASIONASAJOINTPROPERTYOFANINTRODUCEDSPECIES
ANDTHESPECIESALREADYRESIDENTINTHECOMMUNITY CONTINGENTONTHEINTERACTIONS
BETWEENTHENEWSPECIESANDTHERESIDENTS4HEPERCAPITABIRTHANDDEATHRATES
IN%QUATIONNEEDTOBETHOUGHTOFASBEINGDETERMINEDASMUCHBYTHERESIDENT
COMMUNITYATTHETIMEOFINTRODUCTIONASBYPROPERTIESOFTHEINTRODUCEDSPECIES
4HEIMPORTANCEOFRESIDENTANDINTRODUCEDSPECIESASCO DETERMINANTSOFINVA
SIONS WAS CLEAR IN OUR EXPERIMENTAL INTRODUCTIONS OF PROTISTS INTO DIFFERENT COM
MUNITIES ,AW ET AL   7E USED ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TO PARTITION VARIATION
IN INITIAL RATE OF INCREASE BETWEEN INTRODUCED SPECIES RESIDENT COMMUNITY AND
INTRODUCTION=COMMUNITYINTERACTION!SONEMIGHTEXPECT THEANALYSISSHOWED
A STRONG INTRODUCTION = COMMUNITY INTERACTION 4HE VARIATION IN INITIAL GROWTH
RATES OF "LEPHARISMA &IG  AND SEE DISCUSSION ABOVE ILLUSTRATES THE EFFECT OF
DIFFERENCES IN RESIDENT SPECIES "LEPHARISMA AS AN OMNIVORE IS ABLE TO EAT SMALL
PROTISTS AND BACTERIA )N A COMMUNITY WITH 0ARAMECIUM ANOTHER LARGE PROTIST
WITHWHICHITCANONLYCOMPETEFORBACTERIA "LEPHARISMAUSUALLYDECLINEDRAPIDLY
&IGA 7HENWITH#OLPIDIUM WHICHISSOMEWHATSMALLERANDALSOFEEDSONBAC
TERIA "LEPHARISMAWASJUSTABOUTABLETOHOLDITSOWN&IGB )NTHEPRESENCEOF
4ETRAHYMENA ASMALLBACTERIOVOREWHICH"LEPHARISMACANEATASWELLASBACTERIA
"LEPHARISMAPOPULATIONSGREWRAPIDLY&IGC FASTERINFACTTHANWHENALLCOM
PETITIONFORBACTERIAWASREMOVED&IGD 
!LTHOUGHINVASIONMAYDEPENDONINTERACTIONSAMONGSPECIES COULDCOMMU
NITIES HAVE GENERAL PROPERTIES THAT RENDER THEM MORE OR LESS LIABLE TO INVASION
/NE LONG STANDING PREDICTION IS THAT COMMUNITIES WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF SPE
CIESSHOULDBELESSREADILYINVADEDTHANTHOSEWITHFEWSPECIES%LTON
,EVINEAND$!NTONIO THISISONTHEGROUNDSTHATTHEAVAILABLENICHESPACE
ISMOREFULLYOCCUPIED!MONGTHEFEWMICROCOSMEXPERIMENTSTHATHAVEINVES
TIGATEDTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENSPECIESRICHNESSANDINVASIBILITYARETHESTUDIES
BY-C'RADY 3TEEDETAL AND2OBINSONAND$ICKERSON 4HEFORMER
STUDYFOUNDTHATTHEPROTIST%UPLOTESWASABLETOINVADESOMENOTALL MICROCOSMS
OF LOW SPECIES RICHNESS AND ABLE TO INVADE NO COMMUNITIES OF HIGH RICHNESS
4HE LATTER USING THREE DIFFERENT SPECIES OF PROTISTS AS INVADERS APPEARED TO SUG
GESTTHATINVASIONSUCCESSMEASUREDASPRESENCEOFTHEINVADERAFTERTHREEWEEKS
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

WAS NOT STRONGLY INmUENCED BY COMMUNITY DIVERSITY THOUGH A LATER REANALYSIS
,EVINEAND$!NTONIO FOUNDEVIDENCEFORANEGATIVEEFFECTOFDIVERSITYON
SUCCESS(OWEVER EXPERIMENTSOFTHISKINDHAVETHEPROPERTYTHATRICHERCOMMU
NITIESCONTAINMOREDIFFERENTSPECIES(USTON ANDARETHEREFOREMORELIKELY
TOCONTAINPARTICULARSPECIESTHATDISCOURAGEOR POTENTIALLY PROMOTE INVASION
BY PARTICULAR NEW SPECIES MAKING IT DIFlCULT TO ATTRIBUTE INVASION OUTCOMES TO
EFFECTS OF DIVERSITY PER SE 7ARDLE   (ODGSON ET AL  LOOKING AT THE
ABILITY OF PARTICULAR STRAINS OF THE BACTERIUM 0SEUDOMONAS mUORESCENS TO INCREASE
WHEN RARE IN THE PRESENCE OF OTHER STRAINS FOUND AN EFFECT OF DIVERSITY ON THIS
MEASUREOFINVASIBILITY BUTTHATITWASMUCHWEAKENEDBYSTATISTICALREMOVALOF
THISSAMPLINGEFFECT
.UMERICAL STUDIES OF COMMUNITY MODELS SUGGEST THAT COMMUNITIES BECOME
INCREASINGLY RESISTANT TO INVASION AS TIME GOES ON AS A RESULT OF THE TURNOVER OF
SPECIES0OSTAND0IMM $RAKEB ,AWAND-ORTON )NCREASING
INVASIONRESISTANCECANAPPLY EVENIFTHERESIDENTCOMMUNITYISNOTACCUMULAT
INGSPECIES ANDSUGGESTSTHATITSHOULDBERELATIVELYHARDFORNEWSPECIESTOINVADE
COMMUNITIESWITHLONGHISTORIESOFASSEMBLY!LSOONEMIGHTEXPECTCOMMUNITIES
CONSTRUCTED FROM LARGE SPECIES POOLS TO BE LESS READILY INVADED BECAUSE WITH
MORECOMBINATIONSOFSPECIESTESTEDDURINGASSEMBLY AlNERDEGREEOFTUNINGTO
INVASION RESISTANTSTATESBECOMES POSSIBLE 4ODATEWEKNOWOFONLYONE MICROCOSM
STUDYOFTHEEFFECTOFCOMMUNITYAGEONINVASIBILITY,ONGETALUNPUBLISHEDMS 
IN THIS CASE OLDER COMMUNITIES WERE MORE RESISTANT TO TWO OUT OF THREE SPECIES
INTRODUCED THAN THE YOUNGER COMMUNITIES (OWEVER THE OLDER COMMUNITIES
WERECREATEDBYALLOWINGALONGERPERIODOFTIMETOELAPSEFROMAlXEDINITIALSET
OFSPECIES SOINVASIONRESISTANCEHEREMAYBEBETTERINTERPRETEDASACONSEQUENCE
OFBEINGFURTHERALONGATRANSIENTOFCOMMUNITYDYNAMICSRATHERTHANASACON
SEQUENCEOFTURNOVEROFSPECIES

%NVIRONMENTALFACTORSANDTHEPROBABILITYOFESTABLISHMENT

4HEEXTERNALENVIRONMENTOFTHECOMMUNITYISAFURTHERIMPORTANTDETERMINANT
OFWHETHERANEWSPECIESBECOMESESTABLISHED)FRESISTANCETOINVASIONISACON
SEQUENCEOFINTENSEINTERACTIONSBETWEENNEWSPECIESANDRESIDENTS THENFACTORS
THATDISRUPTTHOSEINTERACTIONS MIGHTBEEXPECTEDTOPROMOTEINVASION)NARELATED
VEIN IFTHEREAREENVIRONMENTALCONDITIONSTHATENHANCEGROWTHORPERSISTENCEOF
SPECIESINACOMMUNITYGENERALLY ANDHENCEDIVERSITY THENSUCHCONDITIONSMAY
ALSOINCREASETHELIKELIHOODOFSUCCESSOFANINTRODUCEDSPECIESˆWHENTHESUN
SHINES ITSHINESONTHEJUSTANDTHEUNJUSTALIKE,EVINE 3HEAAND#HESSON
 "YERSAND.OONBURG "OTHTHESEPOSSIBILITIESARGUEFORASIGNIlCANT
ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION EITHER OVER TIME OR BETWEEN COMMUNITIES IN
DETERMININGTHEPROBABILITYOFESTABLISHMENTOFANEWSPECIES
4HE ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR THAT HAS RECEIVED MOST ATTENTION IN THIS RESPECT IS
DISTURBANCE THE ESSENTIAL CONCLUSION BEING THAT AT LEAST ON SOME TIMESCALES
DISTURBANCE ENHANCES INVASION PRESUMABLY BY REDUCING THE INTENSITY OF BIOTIC
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

INTERACTIONS #RAWLEY  2EJMANEK  (OBBS  4HOMPSON ET AL
 3HERAND(YATT $AVISETAL 3HEAAND#HESSON !LTHOUGH
MICROCOSMSWOULDSEEMANOBVIOUSSYSTEMINWHICHTOEXAMINETHISEFFECTSYS
TEMATICALLY WEKNOWOFONLYONESUCHEXPERIMENT,ONGETAL UNPUBLISHEDMS
ASTUDYUSINGHETEROTROPHICPROTISTSWITHDISTURBANCEGENERATEDBYDENSITY INDE
PENDENT MORTALITY OF ALL RESIDENT SPECIES )N THIS CASE DISTURBANCE AFFECTED THE
INTRODUCEDSPECIES"LEPHARISMA 0ARAMECIUMAND#OLPIDIUMINQUITEDIFFERENTWAYS
THEMAINEFFECTSOFDISTURBANCEWERETOENHANCETHEABUNDANCEOF"LEPHARISMA TO
LEAVE0ARAMECIUMUNCHANGED ANDTOREDUCETHEABUNDANCEOF#OLPIDIUM
!SECONDMICROCOSMSTUDY*IANGAND-ORIN WITHPROTISTSANDROTIFERS
PROVIDESONEOFTHElRSTEXPERIMENTALTESTSOFTHEEFFECTOFANOTHERENVIRONMENTAL
FACTOR ENERGYAVAILABILITY ONINVASION)NTHISCASE INCREASEDENERGYAVAILABILITY
PROMOTEDINITIALPOPULATIONGROWTHOFTWODIFFERENTINTRODUCEDSPECIES SUPPORT
INGTHEPOSSIBILITY PREVIOUSLYSPECULATEDABOUTTHEORETICALLY3HEAAND#HESSON
 "YERS AND .OONBURG  THAT SUCCESSFUL ESTABLISHMENT AND RESIDENT
DIVERSITY MIGHT BE POSITIVELY CORRELATED THROUGH THE ACTION OF A COMMON FAC
TOR (OWEVER &UKAMI AND -ORIN  ALSO SHOW USING MICROCOSM SYSTEMS
THAT THE ENERGY DIVERSITY RELATIONSHIPS IN COMMUNITIES ASSEMBLED BY SEQUENTIAL
INVASIONSAREAFFECTEDBYTHEORDERINWHICHINVASIONSOCCUR SUGGESTINGTHATTHE
RELATIONSHIPBETWEENENERGYANDINVASIONSUCCESSMAYNOTALWAYSBEASIMPLEONE

#(!.'%34/#/--5.)4)%3&/,,/7).'%34!",)3(-%.4/&).6!$%23

&OLLOWING SUCCESSFUL ESTABLISHMENT AN INVADING SPECIES TYPICALLY BUILDS UP TO
A SUBSTANTIAL POPULATION SIZE TAKING THE COMMUNITY BEYOND THE POINT AT WHICH
%QUATIONCANPOSSIBLYBEAGOODAPPROXIMATION)NEFFECT THEINVADINGSPECIES
BECOMES ABUNDANT ENOUGH TO CHANGE THE BIRTH AND DEATH RATES OF OTHER SPECIES
IN THE COMMUNITY POTENTIALLY CAUSING CHANGE IN THEIR DENSITIES 4HE CHANGING
DENSITY OF OTHER SPECIES FEEDS BACK TO THE INVADER POTENTIALLY CAUSING CHANGES
INITSOWNBIRTHANDDEATHRATES!TTHISSTAGE THEREISNOALTERNATIVETODEALING
WITHTHEFULLDYNAMICSOFTHECOMMUNITYAUGMENTEDBYTHEINVADER ANDALLTHE
COMPLEXITIESTHATFOLLOWFROMTHIS
$ESPITETHEGREATCOMPLEXITIESOFCOMMUNITYDYNAMICS THEREARESOMEQUALITA
TIVEQUESTIONSABOUTTHEINVADERANDTHECOMMUNITYITENTERSTHATCANBEADDRESSED
AND AGAIN WE DRAW ON EXAMPLES FROM OUR EXPERIMENTS WITH PROTISTS TO DO THIS

$OINVADERSPERSISTINTHELONGTERM

!PRIORI THEREISNOREASONTOEXPECTSPECIESTHATBECOMEESTABLISHEDINTHESHORT
TERMTOPERSISTINTHELONGTERM)TISQUITEPOSSIBLEFORANINVADERTOCHANGETHE
COMMUNITYINSOMEWAYWHICHISDELETERIOUSTOITSELF FORINSTANCEBYDRIVINGITS
PREY TO EXTINCTION (OWEVER IN ANALYSES OF COMMUNITIES WITH ,OTKA 6OLTERRA
DYNAMICS SPECIESABLETOINCREASEFROMINITIALLOWNUMBERSWEREALSOPRESENTIN
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

&IG %XAMPLES OF INITIAL GROWTH OF INTRODUCED PROTISTS AND THE COMMUNITIES THAT
PERSISTEDINTHELONGTERMWEEKS FROMEXPERIMENTSDESCRIBEDIN,AWETAL AND
7ARREN ET AL   ,INES SHOW THE ABUNDANCES OF THE INTRODUCED SPECIES FOR A PERIOD
DETERMINED BY THE POPULATION EITHER SHOWING CONSISTENT POSITIVE GROWTH AND ACHIEVING
NUMBERS GREATER THAN THE INITIAL INOCULUM GOING EXTINCT OR IF NEITHER CONDITION WAS
SATISlED TOANARBITRARYENDPOINTDAYS 4HELETTERCODESUSEDREPRESENTTHESPECIES

)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

THE LONG TERM ,AW AND -ORTON   4HESE STUDIES USED AN ASYMPTOTIC CRITE
RIONCALLEDPERMANENCETOWORKOUTTHESPECIESCOMPOSITIONOFNEWCOMMUNITIES
THEREBYJUMPINGOVERANYEFFECTSTHATTRANSIENTDYNAMICSMIGHTHAVEONPERSIS
TENCEOFSPECIES2EALCOMMUNITIESHAVETOPASSALONGTHETRANSIENTSANDITIS OF
COURSE POSSIBLEFORTHESETRANSIENTSTOBRINGTHEINVADERTOAPOPULATIONSIZELOW
ENOUGHFOREXTINCTIONBYDEMOGRAPHICSTOCHASTICITYTOBECOMEANISSUEAGAIN
1UESTIONS OF LONG TERM PERSISTENCE OF INVADERS CAN BE READILY ADDRESSED IN
MICROCOSMS WHERETHECOMPONENTORGANISMSHAVESHORTGENERATIONTIMES(ERE
WELOOKATTWOASPECTSOFTHISlRST THEVARIATIONINLONGTERMPERSISTENCEAMONG
REPLICATE INTRODUCTIONS AND SECOND THE CORRESPONDENCE BETWEEN INITIAL ESTAB
LISHMENT AND LONG TERM PERSISTENCE OF DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF RESIDENTS AND
INTRODUCEDSPECIES
)N OUR EXPERIMENTS THE LONG TERM FATE OF SPECIES INTRODUCED TO COMMUNITIES
WAS FAR FROM UNIFORM ACROSS THE REPLICATES WITHIN RESIDENT INTRODUCTION TREAT
MENTS )N ABOUT TWO THIRDS OF THE FORTY NINE RESIDENT INTRODUCTION TREATMENTS
ALLINVASIONSEITHERFAILEDORSUCCEEDEDINTHEREMAINDER THERESULTSWEREMIXED
&IG )NOTHERWORDS ALTHOUGHTHECOMMUNITIESCONTAINEDTHESAMESPECIES
WERERUNUNDERTHESAMECONDITIONS ANDWEREINOCULATEDATTHESAMETIMEWITH
THE SAME NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS THERE WAS STILL A SUBSTANTIAL ELEMENT OF INDE
TERMINACY ABOUT THE EVENTUAL FATE OF THE INTRODUCED SPECIES !S ALREADY NOTED
3ECTION  ONE EXPLANATION IS THE SUCCESS OR FAILURE OF INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT
ASILLUSTRATEDBYTHEINVASIONOF"LEPHARISMAINTOSYSTEMSCONTAINING0ARAMECIUM
EG &IG A &IG A ˆ AN INTERESTING CASE IN WHICH THE INVADER ESTABLISHED IN
JUSTONEREPLICATE BUTINTHATSYSTEMTHENPERSISTEDINTHELONGTERM(OWEVER IT
ISNOTABLETHATINITIALESTABLISHMENTANDLONGTERMPERSISTENCEWEREBYNOMEANS
EQUIVALENT&IG 4HISISILLUSTRATEDBY!MOEBAINTRODUCEDINTOACOMMUNITYOF
0ARAMECIUM #OLPIDIUM AND 4ETRAHYMENA &IG B  IT ALWAYS ESTABLISHED ITSELF AT
THESTART BUTDIDNOTPERSISTINALLREPLICATESINTHELONGRUN)NPASSING ITISALSO
INTERESTING TO NOTE THAT EVEN WHERE LONG TERM PERSISTENCE OF THE INVADER OCCURS
INALLREPLICATES THERECOULDBECONSIDERABLEVARIATIONINTHETIMINGANDPATTERN
OFESTABLISHMENT&IGC AGAINMAKINGPREDICTIONFROMINITIALESTABLISHMENTTO
lNALOUTCOMEADIFlCULTTASK
)NOUREXPERIMENTALINVASIONSTHEMISMATCHBETWEENTHECONSISTENCYOFESTAB
LISHMENTANDPERSISTENCE ININDIVIDUALREPLICATEINTRODUCTIONS&IG WASLARGELY

! !MOEBA " "LEPHARISMA # #OLPIDIUM % %UPLOTES 0 0ARAMECIUM 4 4ETRAHYMENA
4HE LETTERS IN THE TOP LEFT HAND CORNER OF THE GRAPH INDICATE THE RESIDENT COMMUNITY
BEFOREINTRODUCTION THEVERTICALDASHEDLINESHOWSTHEPOINTATWHICHINTRODUCTIONSTOOK
PLACE ANDTHELETTERATTHESTARTOFTHETRAJECTORIESINDICATESTHEIDENTITYOFTHEINTRODUCED
SPECIES4HELETTER ORCOMBINATIONOFLETTERSASSOCIATEDWITHEACHLINESHOWTHECOMMUNITY
COMPOSITIONOFTHATMICROCOSMATTHEENDOFTHEEXPERIMENTWEEKSAFTERINTRODUCTION 
." POPULATION TRAJECTORY LINES ARE ONLY DRAWN TO THE POINT AT WHICH ONE OF THE ABOVE
CRITERIA WAS MET WHILE THE lNAL SPECIES COMPOSITION SHOWN WAS THAT RECORDED AFTER
WEEKS
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

DRIVENBYPARTICULARSPECIES&IG )NMOSTINVASIONS SPECIESTHATSHOWEDCLEAR


INITIAL SUCCESS WERE ALSO PRESENT IN THE lNAL COMMUNITY BUT %UPLOTES DESPITE
BEINGASUCCESSFULINVADERINSOMEINSTANCES NEVERPERSISTEDINTHELONGTERM AND
!MOEBA THOUGH MORE PERSISTENT OFTEN SHOWED THE SAME PATTERN &IG   3UCH
SPECIES PROVIDE A COUNTER EXAMPLE TO THE THEORETICAL PREDICTIONS OUTLINED ABOVE
,AWAND-ORTON WHICHSUGGESTTHATSUCCESSFULINVADERSSHOULDBECOME
PERSISTENT MEMBERS OF THE INVADED SYSTEM EVEN IF THEY CAUSE OTHER CHANGES 
)NTERESTINGLY THESESPECIESWERETHETWOOBLIGATEPREDATORSINOURSPECIESPOOLAND
ITMAYBETHATTHEDISCREPANCYWASRELATEDTOTROPHICPOSITION$EMOGRAPHICSTO
CHASTICITYISAPOSSIBLECAUSEOFTHEVULNERABILITYOFINTRODUCEDPREDATORSBECAUSE
FORREASONSOFEITHERENERGYAVAILABILITYOROSCILLATORYPOPULATIONDYNAMICS THEIR
POPULATIONSIZESCOULDHAVEBEENSMALLFROMTIMETOTIME
4HERE IS CLEARLY VARIATION IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INITIAL ESTABLISHMENT
ANDLONGTERMPERSISTENCEATTHELEVELOFINDIVIDUALREPLICATES WHICHHASOBVIOUS
IMPLICATIONSFORPREDICTINGTHEOUTCOMEOFPARTICULARINSTANCESOFANINTRODUCTION

&IG -ISMATCHINESTABLISHMENTANDLONG TERMPERSISTENCEOFPROTISTSINTRODUCEDINTO


MICROCOSMS FROM 7EATHERBY   "ARS SHOW THE PERCENTAGE OF MICROCOSMS IN WHICH
THE INTRODUCED SPECIES BECAME ESTABLISHED OPEN BARS AND PERSISTED IN THE LONG TERM
WEEKS SHADEDBARS $ATAAREGIVENFORALLINDIVIDUALMICROCOSMSACROSSALLRESIDENT
COMMUNITIESINTOWHICHTHESPECIESWASINTRODUCED SOVALUESTAKEINTOACCOUNTTHEMIXED
OUTCOMES SHOWN IN &IG  N IS THE NUMBER OF MICROCOSMS INTO WHICH EACH SPECIES WAS
INTRODUCEDUSUALLYREPLICATESOFEACHRESIDENTCOMMUNITY BUTINSOMECASESONLY OR 
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

(OWEVER WECANALSOLOOKATTHEBROADERPICTURE ANDFOCUSONTHERESIDENT INTRO


DUCTION COMBINATIONS IN WHICH THE MAJORITY OF REPLICATES HAD THE SAME OUT
COMEBOTHINTERMSOFESTABLISHMENTANDCOMPOSITIONOFTHElNALCOMMUNITY 
4AKINGJUSTTHESEMORECONSISTENTOUTCOMESATOTALOFTHIRTYlVERESIDENT INTRO
DUCTION COMBINATIONS IN THE MAJORITY OF CASES THE INTRODUCED SPECIES EITHER
ESTABLISHED AND PERSISTED  OR FAILED BOTH TO ESTABLISH AND TO PERSIST  
4HERE WERE RELATIVELY FEW CASES IN WHICH SPECIES ESTABLISHED AND THEN FAILED
TO PERSIST  AND NONE IN WHICH SPECIES FAILED TO ESTABLISH BUT YET PERSISTED
4HISLASTCATEGORYMAYSEEMATRUISM BUTITISNOTSO BECAUSEITWOULDBEPOSSIBLE
FORANINVADERTOPERSISTWITHOUTSHOWINGNETPOPULATIONGROWTH THEREFOREFAILING
TOMEETTHECRITERIONFORESTABLISHMENT 4HUSTHEMESSAGEFROMTHESEMICROCOSM
STUDIESISTHATINITIALESTABLISHMENTOFANINTRODUCEDSPECIESWITHINACOMMUNITY
WHICH COULD FEASIBLY BE MEASURED EVEN IN THE lELD IS A FAIR BUT NOT PERFECT
PREDICTOROFITSFATEINTHELONGTERM

$OTHEINVADERSHAVEANIMPACTONTHERESIDENTS

7EHAVESOFARFOCUSEDONTHEFATEOFTHEINVADER BUTITISOFTENNOTTHEINVADER
ASSUCHWHICHISOFPRIMARYCONCERN BUTRATHERTHEIMPACTOFTHEINVADERONTHE
COMMUNITIESITINVADES0ARKERETAL 'ENERALIZATIONSABOUTTHESEIMPACTS
AREBOUNDTOBEHARDTOMAKE BECAUSEOFTHECOMPLEXNONLINEARCOUPLINGSTHAT
CHARACTERIZECOMMUNITYDYNAMICS)TISENTIRELYPOSSIBLEFORTHEIMPACTTOBENEGLI
GIBLE ORFOROTHERSPECIESTOBEDRIVENTOEXTINCTION!NINVADERMAYTARGETPARTIC
ULARSPECIESEG $UTCH%LMDISEASEINTHE5+7ILLIAMSON ORHAVEEFFECTS
THAT RAMIFY WIDELY THROUGH THE COMMUNITY EG WHOLE ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS OF
-YRICAFAYAONVOLCANICSITESIN(AWAII6ITOUSEKAND7ALKER THEDEMISE
OF KELP BEDS FOLLOWING KILLER WHALE ARRIVAL ON THE 0ACIFIC COAST OF . !MERICA
%STESETAL -ICROCOSMCOMMUNITIESAREESPECIALLYAMENABLETOSYSTEM
ATICINVESTIGATIONOFIMPACTSOFINVADERSBECAUSEWECANTAKETHEMAPARTINAN
ORDERLYREPLICATEDWAY TOSEEWHATEFFECTEACHINVADINGSPECIESEVENTUALLYHASON
THESPECIESCOMPOSITIONOFEACHCOMMUNITY ANDHOWTHISRELATESTOTHEINVADERS
OWN ABILITY TO PERSIST 6ARIOUS SCENARIOS ARE POSSIBLE  THE INVADER PERSISTS
ANDTHERESIDENTCOMMUNITYISCHANGED THEINVADERPERSISTSANDTHERESIDENT
COMMUNITYISUNCHANGED THEINVADERFAILSTOPERSIST BUTTHERESIDENTCOMMU
NITYISCHANGED THEINVADERFAILSANDTHERESIDENTCOMMUNITYISUNCHANGED
3ITUATION ISTHECLASSIC@PROBLEMINVASION ANINVADERTHATBECOMESAPART
OFTHECOMMUNITYANDCHANGESIT USUALLYBYGENERATINGONEORMOREEXTINCTIONS
IN THE RESIDENTS THE INVASION OF THE COMMUNITY COMPRISING "LEPHARISMA AND
#OLPIDIUM BY 0ARAMECIUM &IG A PROVIDES AN EXAMPLE OF THIS FROM OUR MICRO
COSM EXPERIMENTS 4HESE ARE ALSO THE BEST DOCUMENTED INVASION CASE STUDIES IN
NATURALSYSTEMSEG %LTON $RAKEETAL BECAUSEINVADERSTHAT PERSIST
AREMOSTREADILYDOCUMENTEDANDSTUDIED ANDTHEIRIMPACTSAREOFCONCERN
)N WEHAVESIMPLEAUGMENTATIONOFTHECOMMUNITYBYANINVADER/FCOURSE
THECOLONIZINGSPECIESMAYALTERDENSITIESOFOTHERSPECIES BUTNOTTOASUFlCIENT
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

EXTENTTOCAUSESPECIESLOSSES)NVASIONOF"LEPHARISMASYSTEMSBY0ARAMECIUMPRO
VIDESANEXAMPLEALTHOUGHTHERESIDENTPERSISTED&IGB ITWASABOUTONElFTH
ASABUNDANTINTHEINVADEDSYSTEMSASINTHEUNINVADEDCONTROLSATTHEENDOFTHE
EXPERIMENT4HEREAREEXAMPLESFROMNATURALSYSTEMSOFINVADERSWHICHAPPEARTO
ADDTHEMSELVESTOSYSTEMSBUTCAUSELITTLEIMPACTEG THEFULMAR&ULMARISGLACIA
LIS ANARCTICSEABIRD7ILLIAMSONETSEQ 4HEFREQUENCYOFNON IMPACTIVE
INVASIONSHOWEVERREMAINSACONTROVERSIALISSUE0ARKERETAL FOREXAMPLE
SEE3IMBERLOFF (ERBOLDAND-OYLE 0IMM BECAUSEITCANBEDIF
lCULTTOESTABLISHIMPACTSANDTESTFORCAUSALITYIFTHEREARENOSUITABLEUNINVADED
SYSTEMSFORCOMPARISON
3CENARIO REQUIRESTHATASPECIESFAILSTOPERSIST BUTHASSUFlCIENTLYSTRONG
EFFECTS ON THE RESIDENT COMMUNITY WHILE IT IS PRESENT TO CAUSE CHANGES IN SPE
CIES COMPOSITION 3UCH SPECIES CAN BE TERMED @CATALYSTS )N OUR EXPERIMENTS
CATALYSTS WERE NOT COMMON BUT TWO SPECIES DID PLAY THIS ROLE IN SOME SITUA
TIONSPRINCIPALLY%UPLOTESANDALSO!MOEBAINOCCASIONALREPLICATES&OREXAMPLE
%UPLOTESESTABLISHEDITSELFINACOMMUNITYCOMPRISING0ARAMECIUM #OLPIDIUMAND
4ETRAHYMENA CAUSEDTHELATTERTWOSPECIESTOGOEXTINCTINMOSTSYSTEMS ANDTHEN
WENTTOEXTINCTIONITSELF&IGC )NTHISEXAMPLE%UPLOTESDIDESTABLISHINCREASE
IN POPULATION SIZE AFTER INTRODUCTION BUT THERE WERE ALSO CASES EG %UPLOTES
INVADINGTHECOMMUNITYOF 0ARAMECIUMAND 4ETRAHYMENA INWHICH THEINVADER
DIDNOTCONSISTENTLYINCREASEABOVEITSINITIALNUMBERS BUTNONETHELESSCAUSEDAN
EXTINCTIONOFONEOFTHERESIDENTS4ETRAHYMENA BEFOREITSELFGOINGEXTINCT4HERE
ISSOMETHEORETICALEVIDENCEOFSUCHEFFECTSINMODELSOFINVASIONSINTOCOMPETI
TIVE SYSTEMS #ASE   3OME EXAMPLES OF SITUATIONS IN NATURAL SYSTEMS SEEM
TOSHOWTHISBEHAVIOUREG &LUX BUTTHEAPPARENTRARITYOFSUCHOBSERVA
TIONS7ILLIAMSON ISCONSISTENTWITHTHERELATIVERARITYOFTHESEEFFECTSINOUR
EXPERIMENTALSYSTEMS
&INALLYWEHAVESCENARIO )NTHISCASE THEFAILUREOFTHEINTRODUCEDSPECIES
TOPERSIST COUPLEDWITHTHELACKOFCHANGEINTHERESIDENTCOMMUNITYEG &IG
D SUGGESTSTHAT EFFECTIVELY THEREISNOTHINGWEWOULDRECOGNIZEASANINVASION
ATALL)NTHEMAJORITYOFINTRODUCTIONSWITHTHISOUTCOMETHISWASVERYMUCHTHE
CASE WITHTHEINTRODUCEDSPECIESSIMPLYDECLININGTOEXTINCTIONAFTERINTRODUCTION
(OWEVERTHEREWEREALSOAFEWCASESINWHICHINTRODUCEDSPECIESSHOWEDSUCCESS
FULINITIALESTABLISHMENT WHILENONETHELESSEVENTUALLYGOINGEXTINCTANDLEAVING
THE RESIDENT SET UNCHANGED FOR EXAMPLE IN MOST INTRODUCTIONS OF %UPLOTES INTO
POPULATIONS OF 4ETRAHYMENA %UPLOTES ACHIEVED POPULATIONS OF SEVERAL THOUSANDS
OFINDIVIDUALSBEFOREDISAPPEARING%VIDENTLYANINTRODUCEDSPECIESCANACHIEVEA
SIGNIlCANTPRESENCEDURINGSOMEPARTOFANULTIMATELYUNSUCCESSFULINVASION
"ECAUSE OUR MICROCOSM EXPERIMENTS CONTAINED ALL POSSIBLE PERMUTATIONS OF
RESIDENT COMMUNITY AND INTRODUCED SPECIES WE CAN USE THESE RESULTS TO LOOK AT
THE FREQUENCIES OF THESE VARIOUS OUTCOMES AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER WHICH
THEYOCCUR4AKINGJUSTTHETHIRTY SIXRESIDENT INTRODUCTIONTREATMENTSINWHICH
THEMAJORITYOFREPLICATESENDEDUPWITHTHESAMESPECIESCOMPOSITIONINTHELONG
TERM THERESIDENTCOMMUNITYWASALTEREDINJUSTNINEOFTHESE7ARRENETAL 
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

&IG %XAMPLES OF INITIAL GROWTH OF INTRODUCED PROTISTS AND THE COMMUNITIES THAT
PERSISTED IN THE LONG TERM FOR COMBINATIONS OF PERSISTENCE AND NON PERSISTENCE OF
THE INVADER AND IMPACT OR LACK OF IMPACT ON THE RESIDENTS 3TRUCTURE AND NOTATION AS
FOR&IG

!SONEMIGHTEXPECTEG #ASE CHANGESTOTHE RESIDENT C OMMUNITYBECAME


MORELIKELYASTHENUMBEROFRESIDENTSPECIESINCREASED RISINGFROMABOUTIN
ONE SPECIESCOMMUNITIESTOINTWO SPECIESCOMMUNITIES TOINTHREE
SPECIES COMMUNITIES THOUGH THERE ARE ONLY TWO THREE SPECIES COMBINATIONS 
4HE EFFECT OF THE INTRODUCED SPECIES WAS MOST OFTEN NEGATIVE CAUSING EXTINCTION
OFRESIDENTSPECIESSIXCASES ALTHOUGHTHEREWERETHREEINSTANCESOFTHEREVERSE
EFFECT IE A RESIDENT SPECIES #OLPIDUM IN TWO SYSTEMS AND 0ARAMECIUM INONE
FOR WHICH PERSISTENCE SEEMED TO BE ENHANCED BY THE PRESENCE OF THE INVADERS
!MOEBA 0ARAMECIUMAND%UPLOTES 
0UTTING THESE RESULTS TOGETHER WE CAN BREAK DOWN THE THIRTY SIX RESIDENT
INTRODUCTIONTREATMENTSINTOTHOSEINWHICHTHEINTRODUCEDSPECIESPERSISTEDAND
THE RESIDENT COMMUNITY WAS CHANGED  THE INTRODUCED SPECIES PERSISTED BUT
THERESIDENTCOMMUNITYWASNOTCHANGED THEINTRODUCEDSPECIESDIDNOTPER
SIST BUTTHERESIDENTCOMMUNITYWASCHANGED ANDTHEINTRODUCEDSPECIESDID
NOTPERSISTANDTHERESIDENTSWEREUNCHANGED #LEARLYTHEREISNOSIGNIlCANT
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN THE LIKELIHOOD OF ESTABLISHMENT OF INTRODUCED SPECIES AND
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

THE LIKELIHOOD OF THE RESIDENT COMMUNITY BEING ALTERED &ISHERS %XACT 4EST
P )FTHISSORTOFPATTERNTURNSOUTTOHAVEANYSORTOFGENERALITY ITLENDS
WEIGHT TO THE VIEW THAT KNOWING A SPECIES IS LIKELY TO BECOME ESTABLISHED AND
PERSISTINASYSTEMMAYPROVIDENOUSEFULGUIDETOWHETHERITISGOINGTOCHANGE
THEEXISTINGCOMMUNITYINOTHERWAYS

).6!3)/.3!.$#/--5.)49!33%-",9

!LTHOUGH OUR MAIN FOCUS HERE HAS BEEN ON THE COMPONENTS OF INDIVIDUAL INVA
SIONS THEARRIVALOFANEWSPECIES ANDANYCHANGESINCOMMUNITYCOMPOSITION
THATACCOMPANYTHIS AREJUSTASINGLESTEPINALONGER TERMPROCESSOFCOMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENTTHROUGHTHEGRADUALTURNOVEROFSPECIES3UCHTURNOVER GENERALLY
TERMED @COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY IS DETERMINED BY FACTORS ACTING AT VERY DIFFERENT
SCALES FROM BIOGEOGRAPHIC CONSTRAINTS ON THE SPECIES POOL THROUGH TO PATTERNS
OF NICHE DIFFERENTIATION AMONG COMPETITORS IN A COMMUNITY $IAMOND AND
#ASE $RAKEA 'RAYETAL 7EIHERAND+EDDY BUTHASTHE
SAMEUNDERLYINGDRIVERTHEARRIVAL ESTABLISHMENT ANDSOMETIMESPERSISTENCE OF
SPECIESFROMOUTSIDETHESYSTEMIE INVASION(ERE CERTAINLY THELINKSBETWEEN
COMMUNITYECOLOGYANDINVASIONBIOLOGYAREEXPLICITINVASIONSDRIVECOMMUNITY
CHANGE/FCOURSEINMOSTOFTHE@INVASIONSEFFECTINGSUCHCHANGESTHEINVADERIS
NOT FROM A NEW REGION DISSOCIATED FROM THE SPECIES IN THE RESIDENT COMMUNITY
BUTNONETHELESS THECOMPONENTSOFTHEINVASIONPROCESSWEHAVEDISCUSSEDABOVE
APPLY EQUALLY TO WHAT MIGHT BE TERMED @LOCAL INVASIONS AND THEREFORE TO COM
MUNITYCHANGEINGENERAL
-ICROCOSM SYSTEMS FOR THE SAME REASONS THAT MAKE THEM USEFUL FOR STUDY
ING INVASIONS HAVE PLAYED A SIGNIlCANT ROLE IN EXPLORING COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY
)NPARTICULARMICROCOSMSOFALGAE PROTISTSANDSMALLMETAZOANSHAVEBEENUSED
TOEXAMINETHEEFFECTSOFNON SIMULTANEOUSINVASION INVASIONORDERANDINVASION
RATEONTHEDEVELOPMENTOFCOMMUNITYSTRUCTURE$ICKERSONAND2OBINSON
  2OBINSONAND$ICKERSON 2OBINSONAND%DGEMON $RAKE
 &UKAMI AND -ORIN   4HE GENERAL CONCLUSION FROM THESE STUDIES IS
THATCONTINGENCIESINTHEINVASIONPROCESSCANRESULTINSUBSTANTIALDIFFERENCESIN
THESTRUCTUREOFTHElNALCOMMUNITIESTHATAREFORMED3UCHSTUDIESAREGENERALLY
PRESENTEDINTHECONTEXTOFCOMMUNITYASSEMBLY ANDDOCUMENTTHEOUTCOMESOF
DIFFERENTSEQUENCESORRATESOFSPECIESARRIVAL RATHERTHANTHEDETAILSOFINDIVIDUAL
INVASIONSWHICHHAVEBEENOURFOCUSHERE BUTITISCLEARTHATTHESORTSOFEFFECTS
WESEEININDIVIDUALINVASIONS INPARTICULARSTOCHASTICEFFECTSINLOWPOPULATIONS
ANDTHEINTERDEPENDENCEOFSUCCESSONINVADERANDRESIDENTCOMMUNITYIDENTITIES
COULDBETHEDRIVERSOFSUCHASSEMBLYSEQUENCEEFFECTSEG $RAKE $RAKES
STUDY EVEN FOUND EVIDENCE TO SUGGEST THAT INVASIBILITY OF SYSTEMS WITH IDENTICAL
SPECIESCOMPOSITIONSMAYTOBEAFFECTEDBYDIFFERENCESINTHEIRASSEMBLYHISTORY
-ICROCOSMSAREALSOBEINGUSEDTOEXAMINETHEEFFECTSOFTHECONTINUOUSASSEMBLY
ANDDISASSEMBLYOFCOMMUNITIESINMULTIPLEHABITATPATCHES WHEREINVASIONSARE
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

ANECESSARYANDNATURALPARTOFTHEMAINTENANCEOFPOPULATIONSANDCOMMUNITIES
WITHIN A @LANDSCAPE $RAKE ET AL  (OLYOAK AND ,AWLER A B 7ARREN
 "URKEY  (OLT ET AL  AND WITH THE POSSIBLE THOUGH LARGELY
UNEXPLORED OPPORTUNITYSUCHWORKPROVIDESFOREXAMININGTHESPREADOFINVADERS
THROUGHACOMMUNITYLANDSCAPE
0UTTING THESE COMPONENTS TOGETHER ALLOWS US TO CONSTRUCT A DESCRIPTION OF
THE COMMUNITY SPACE PERSISTENT COMMUNITIES AND THE ROUTES THAT COMMUNITY
ASSEMBLYCANTAKETHROUGHTHATSPACEASARESULTOFINVASIONSINTOEACHCOMMUNI
TY:IMMERMANETAL 7ARRENETAL WHICHWECANTERMANASSEMBLY
GRAPHEG &IG !SSEMBLYGRAPHSCANCLARIFYFEATURESOFCOMMUNITYASSEMBLY
THAT WOULD OTHERWISE REMAIN OBSCURE &OR EXAMPLE THE GRAPH SHOWN IN &IG 
HASACYCLICEND STATEDRIVENBYTHEPARTICULARCHARACTERISTICSOF%UPLOTES%UPLOTES
INVADES THE COMMUNITY COMPOSED OF 0ARAMECIUM AND 4ETRAHYMENA ELIMINATES
THE 4ETRAHYMENA AND THEN ITSELF GOES TO EXTINCTION LEAVING A COMMUNITY OF JUST
0ARAMECIUMWHICHCANTHENBEREINVADEDBY4ETRAHYMENATORETURNTOTHEORIGINAL
COMMUNITY!NOTHERFEATUREOFTHEGRAPHISTHEEXISTENCEOFCOMMUNITIES SUCH
AS THAT COMPRISING #OLPIDIUM AND 4ETRAHYMENA WHICH PERSIST IF ALL SPECIES ARE
INTRODUCEDTOGETHERBUTWHICHCANNOTREADILYBECREATEDBYSEQUENTIALINVASION
FROMANYOTHERPERSISTENTCOMMUNITY4HEGENERALITYOFSUCHFEATURESREMAINSTO
BEESTABLISHED BUTWHATISCLEARISTHATUNDERSTANDINGTHEINVASIONPROCESSLIESAT
THEHEARTOFUNDERSTANDINGTHISFUNDAMENTALASPECTOFCOMMUNITYECOLOGY

-)#2/#/3-3!33934%-3&/2345$9).').6!3)/.")/,/'9

2EMARKABLYLITTLEWORKONBIOLOGICALINVASIONSHASBEENDONEINMICROCOSMSYS
TEMS YETEVENFROMTHEFEWSTUDIESTHEREARE ANUMBEROFMESSAGESEMERGE7ORK
INMICROCOSMSHIGHLIGHTSTHEPROBABILISTICNATUREOFTHEINVASIONPROCESS THEJOINT
DEPENDENCEOFINVASIONSUCCESSONBOTHINVADERIDENTITYANDRESIDENTCOMMUNITY
COMPOSITION THE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DIFFERENT PHASES OF THE INVASION PROCESS
ESTABLISHMENT PERSISTENCE IMPACT ANDTHEIMPORTANCEOFDISTURBANCE ENERGY
ANDSPECIESNUMBER
4HIS SEEMS A RESPECTABLE YIELD OF INFORMATION FROM A MODEST AMOUNT OF
EXPERIMENTAL WORK 4HESE RESULTS WERE MADE POSSIBLE BY THE HAVING THE FACILITY
TO MANIPULATE RESIDENT AND INTRODUCED SPECIES BY FOLLOWING THE OUTCOMES OVER
TENS TO HUNDREDS OF GENERATIONS AND BY PUTTING IN PLACE ENOUGH REPLICATION TO
PARTITION VARIATION WITHIN AND BETWEEN TREATMENTS 4HERE IS LITTLE LIKELIHOOD OF
BEINGABLETOCARRYOUTEXPERIMENTSATEQUIVALENTTEMPORALANDSPATIALSCALESIN
THE lELD &IELD STUDIES HAVE PROVIDED IMPORTANT INSIGHTS INTO ALL THESE ELEMENTS
OFINVASIONS BUTMICROCOSMSBRINGTHEFACILITYTORELATETHELONGANDSHORT TERM
OUTCOMES OF THE INVASION PROCESS AND QUANTIFY THE STOCHASTICITIES INVOLVED /F
COURSE THESCARCITYOFSUCHSTUDIESINMICROCOSMSPRECLUDESMUCHASSESSMENTOF
THEGENERALITYOFTHESERESULTS ASITWOULDINANYSYSTEM4HEDIFFERENCEISTHAT IN
MICROCOSMS TESTINGTHISGENERALITYISANENTIRELYFEASIBLEPROSPECT
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

&IG 4HEASSEMBLYGRAPHFORTHESIXSPECIESPROTISTSYSTEMDESCRIBEDIN7ARRENETAL
  4HELETTERCODESASFOR&IG INBRACKETSREPRESENTTHEPERSISTENTCOMMUNITIES AND
THEARROWSREPRESENTTRANSITIONSBETWEENTHOSECOMMUNITIESPRODUCEDBYINTRODUCTIONSOF
THESPECIESREPRESENTEDBYTHELETTERCODEONTHEARROW!RROWSAREBASEDONTHEMAJORITY
TRANSITIONSOBSERVEDINTHEEXPERIMENTSINEACHCASE SOTHATONLYASINGLEOUTCOMEFROM
ANYPARTICULARINVASIONISDEPICTEDSEE7ARRENETALFORANALTERNATIVEPRESENTATION
THAT INCLUDES THE VARIATION IN OUTCOMES  $OTTED ARROWS SHOW WHERE CERTAIN RESIDENT
COMMUNITIESHADATENDENCYTOCOLLAPSEEVENTUALLY EVENINTHEABSENCEOFINVASIONS AND
THEDASHEDARROWSARETRANSITIONSTHATAREBASEDONINFORMATIONFROMONLYTWOREPLICATES
4HECOMMUNITIESDEPICTEDINGREYARETHOSEFORMEDASARESULTOFINVASIONS BUTNOTFOUND
ININITIALEXPERIMENTSTOESTABLISHWHICHSETSOFSPECIESCOULDCOEXIST ANDHENCEFORWHICH
NOINVASIONTRIALSWERECARRIEDOUT ANDSOWEHAVENOINFORMATIONONTHEIRINVASIBILITY
&IGUREREPRODUCEDBYPERMISSIONOFTHE%COLOGICAL3OCIETYOF!MERICA 
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

4HATSUCHQUESTIONSCOULDBEADDRESSEDIS THOUGH PERHAPSNOTTHEISSUE4HOSE


SCEPTICALOFTHEMICROCOSMAPPROACHWOULDQUESTIONWHETHEREVENIFWEHADSUCH
STUDIES WE WOULD BE ANY THE WISER ABOUT INVASIONS IN THE lELD 4HE ARGUMENTS
ABOUT USING MICROCOSMS IN ECOLOGY ARE WELL REHEARSED EG $RAKE ET AL 
#ARPENTER  $RENNERAND-AZUMDER ,AWLER *ESSUPETAL
 BUTAGAINSTTHELIMITATIONSWEHAVETOSETTHEADVANTAGESOUTLINEDABOVE
-ICROCOSMS DO NOT ALLOW US TO MAKE PRACTICAL MANAGEMENT DECISIONS ABOUT
SPECIlCINVASIONS BUTTHEYDOALLOWUSTOTESTOURINTUITION REASONINGANDTHEORY
ASTOTHEBASICECOLOGICALPRINCIPLESTHATUNDERPINTHEM$RAKEETAL ,AWLER
 7ETAKETHEVIEWTHATMICROCOSMSCAN ANDSHOULD PLAYASIGNIlCANTROLE
INDEVELOPINGOURUNDERSTANDINGOFINVASIONPROCESSES7EWILLUNDERSTANDINVA
SIONSBETTERARMEDWITHGOODEXPERIMENTALDATAFROMMICROCOSMS INCOMBINATION
WITH THEORY lELD EXPERIMENTS AND OBSERVATIONAL DATA THAN FROM ANY OF THESE
SOURCES ALONE AND WE WILL ALSO END UP KNOWING A GREAT DEAL MORE ABOUT HOW
COMMUNITIESWORKASACONSEQUENCE

!#+./7,%$'%-%.43

7EAREGRATEFULTOTHEEDITORSFORTHEINVITATIONTOCONTRIBUTETOTHISVOLUME/UR
THANKSGOTO0ETER-ORIN ,IN*IANGAND:AC,ONG FORKINDLYSENDINGUSMANU
SCRIPTS PRIOR TO PUBLICATION TO -ARK 7ILLIAMSON AND +EN 4HOMPSON FOR HELPFUL
DISCUSSIONS ABOUT INVASIONS AND TO *EREMY &OX 4AD &UKAMI /WEN 0ETCHEY
$AVID7ARDLEAND-ARK7ILLIAMSONFORTHOUGHTFULCOMMENTSONTHEMANUSCRIPT
4HEEXPERIMENTALWORKDISCUSSEDINTHISCHAPTERWASFUNDEDBYAGRANTFROMTHE
5+.ATURAL%NVIRONMENT2ESEARCH#OUNCIL

2%&%2%.#%3

!NDERSON 2-AND-AY 2- )NFECTIOUSDISEASESOFHUMANS/XFORD5NIVERSITY


0RESS/XFORD 5 +
"AILEY .4* %LEMENTSOFSTOCHASTICPROCESSES7ILEY .EW9ORK 53!
"URKEY 46 -ETAPOPULATIONEXTINCTIONINFRAGMENTEDLANDSCAPESUSINGBACTERIA
ANDPROTOZOACOMMUNITIESASMODELECOSYSTEMS!M.AT  
"YERS *% AND .OONBURG %' 3CALEDEPENDENTEFFECTS OFBIOTIC RESISTANCE
TO
BIO

LOGICALINVASION%COLOGY   
#ARPENTER 32 -ICROCOSMEXPERIMENTSHAVELIMITEDRELEVANCEFORCOMMUNITYAND
ECOSYSTEMECOLOGY%COLOGY   
#ARPENTER 32 -ICROCOSMEXPERIMENTSHAVELIMITEDRELEVANCEFORCOMMUNITYAND
ECOSYSTEMECOLOGYREPLY%COLOGY   
#ASE 4* )NVASIONRESISTENCEARISESINSTRONGLYINTERACTINGSPECIES RICHMODELSOF
COMPETITIONCOMMUNITIES0ROC.ATN!CAD3CI53!   
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

#ASE 4* 3URPRISINGBEHAVIORFROMAFAMILIARMODELANDIMPLICATIONSFORCOMPETI


TIONTHEORY!M.AT   
#RAWLEY -* 4HEPOPULATIONBIOLOGYOFINVADERS0HIL4RANS2OY3OC,OND"
   
#RAWLEY -* #HANCEANDTIMINGINBIOLOGICALINVASIONSPP )N$RAKE
* ! -OONEY ( ! DI #ASTRI & 'ROVES 2 ( +RUGER & * 2EJMANEK - AND
7ILLIAMSON -EDS "IOLOGICALINVASIONSAGLOBALPERSPECTIVE3#/0%*OHN7ILEY
AND3ONS #HICHESTER 5+
$AVIS -! 'RIME *0AND4HOMPSON + &LUCTUATINGRESOURCESINPLANT COMMU
NITIESAGENERALTHEORYOFINVASIBILITY*%COL   
$AVIS -!AND0ELSOR- %XPERIMENTALSUPPORTFORARESOURCE BASEDMECHANISTIC
MODELOFINVASIBILITY%COL,ETT   
$IAMOND * AND #ASE 4 *  /VERVIEW INTRODUCTIONS EXTINCTIONS EXTERMINATIONS
AND INVASIONS PP   )N $IAMOND * AND #ASE 4 * EDS #OMMUNITY %COLOGY
(ARPERAND2OW .EW9ORK 53!
$ICK * 4 ! 0LATVOET $ AND +ELLY $ 7  0REDATORY IMPACT OF THE FRESHWATER
INVADER $IKEROGAMMARUS VILLOSUS #RUSTACEA !MPHIPODA  #AN * &ISH !QUAT 3CI
   
$ICKERSON *%AND2OBINSON *$ 4HEASSEMBLYOFMICROSCOPICCOMMUNITIESPAT
TERNSOFSPECIESIMPORTANCE4RANS!M-ICROSC3OC  
$ICKERSON *%AND2OBINSON *6 -ICROCOSMSASISLANDSATESTOFTHE-AC!RTHUR
7ILSONEQUILIBRIUMTHEORY%COLOGY  
$ICKERSON *%AND2OBINSON *6 4HECONTROLLEDASSEMBLYOFMICROCOSMICCOM
MUNITIESTHESELECTIVEEXTINCTIONHYPOTHESIS/ECOLOGIA  
$RAKE * ! A #OMMUNITIES AS ASSEMBLED STRUCTURES DO RULES GOVERN PATTERN
4RENDS%COL%VOL   
$RAKE *!B 4HEMECHANICSOFCOMMUNITYASSEMBLYANDSUCCESSION*4HEOR"IOL
   
$RAKE *! #OMMUNITY ASSEMBLYMECHANICSANDTHESTRUCTUREOFANEXPERIMENTAL
SPECIESENSEMBLE!M.AT   
$RAKE *! &LUM 4% 7ITTEMAN '* 6OSKUIL 4 (OLYMAN !- #RESON # +ENNY
$! (UXEL '2 ,ARUE #3AND$UNCAN *2 4HECONSTRUCTIONANDASSEMBLY
OFANECOLOGICALLANDSCAPE*!NIM%COL  
$RAKE *! (UXEL '2AND(EWITT #, -ICROCOSMSASMODELSFORGENERATINGAND
TESTINGCOMMUNITYTHEORY%COLOGY  
$RAKE * ! -OONEY ( ! DI #ASTI & 'ROVES 2 ( +RUGER & * 2EJMÉNEK - AND
7ILLIAMSON -ED  "IOLOGICALINVASIONSAGLOBALPERSPECTIVE3#/0%*OHN
7ILEYAND3ONS#HICHESTER 5+
$RENNER 27AND-AZUMDER ! -ICROCOSMEXPERIMENTSHAVELIMITEDRELEVANCE
FORCOMMUNITYANDECOSYSTEMECOLOGY%COLOGY   
$UKES *3 "IODIVERSITYANDINVASIBILITYINGRASSLANDMICROCOSMS/ECOLOGIA
 
%LTON #3 4HEECOLOGYOFINVASIONSBYANIMALSANDPLANTS-ENTHUEN ,ONDON 5+ 
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 

%STES * ! 7ILLIAMS - 4 AND $OAK $ &  +ILLES WHALE PREDATION ON SEA OTTERS
LINKINGOCEANICANDNEARSHOREECOSYSTEMS3CIENCE  
&LUX *% 7ORLDDISTRIBUTIONPP )N4HOMPSON (6AND+ING #-EDS
4HE%UROPEANRABBITTHEHISTORYANDBIOLOGYOFASUCCESSFULINVADER/XFORD5NIVERSITY
0RESS /XFORD
&UKAMI 4AND-ORIN 0* 0RODUCTIVITY BIODIVERSITYRELATIONSHIPSDEPENDONTHE
HISTORYOFCOMMUNITYASSEMBLY.ATURE  
'OEL . 3AND 2ICHTER $YN .  3TOCHASTIC MODELS IN BIOLOGY !CADEMIC 0RESS
.EW9ORK 53!
'RAY !*AND#RAWLEY -*AND%DWARDS 0*ED  #OLONIZATION SUCCESSIONAND
STABILITY"LACKWELL3CIENCE /XFORD 5+
(ECTOR ! $OBSON + -INNS ! "AZELEY 7HITE %AND,AWTON *( #OMMUNITY
DIVERSITYANDINVASIONRESISTANCEANEXPERIMENTALTESTINAGRASSLANDECOSYSTEMANDA
REVIEWOFCOMPARABLESTUDIES%COL2ES  
(ERBOLD "AND-OYLE 0" )NTRODUCEDSPECIESANDVACANTNICHES!M.AT
  
(OBBS 2 *  4HE NATURE AND EFFECTS OF DISTURBANCE RELATIVE TO INVASIONS #H 
PP )N$RAKE *! -OONEY (! DI#ASTRI & 'ROVES 2( +RUGER &*
2EJMÉNEK -AND7ILLIAMSON -ED "IOLOGICALINVASIONSAGLOBALPERSPECTIVE3#/0%
*OHN7ILEYAND3ONS #HICHESTER 5+
(ODGSON $* 2AINEY 0"AND"UCKLING ! -ECHANISMSLINKINGDIVERSITY PRO
DUCTIVITYANDINVASIBILITYINEXPERIMENTALBACTERIALCOMMUNITIES0ROC2OY3OC,OND
"   
(OLT !2 7ARREN 0(AND'ASTON +* 4HEIMPORTANCEOFBIOTICINTERACTIONSIN
ABUNDANCE OCCUPANCYRELATIONSHIPS*!NIM%COL   
(OLYOAK - AND ,AWLER 3 0  0ERSISTENCE OF AN EXTINCTION PRONE PREDATOR PREY
INTERACTIONTHROUGHMETAPOPULATIONDYNAMICS%COLOGY  
(OLYOAK -AND,AWLER 30 4HEROLEOFDISPERSALINPREDATOR PREYMETAPOPULATION
DYNAMICS*!NIM%COL   
(OPPER +2AND2OUSH 24 -ATElNDING DISPERSAL NUMBERRELEASED ANDTHE
SUCCESSOFBIOLOGICALCONTROLINTRODUCTIONS%COL%NTOMOL   
(USTON -! (IDDENTREATMENTSINECOLOGICALEXPERIMENTSRE EVALUATINGTHEECO
SYSTEMFUNCTIONOFBIODIVERSITY/ECOLOGIA   
*IANG ,AND-ORIN 0* 0RODUCTIVITYGRADIENTSCAUSEPOSITIVEDIVERSITY INVASIBILITY
RELATIONSHIPSINMICROBIALCOMMUNITIES%COL,ETT  
*ESSUP #- +ASSEN 2 &ORDE 3% +ERR " "UCKLING ! 2AINEY 0"AND"OHANNAN
"*- "IGQUESTIONS SMALLWORLDSMICROBIALMODELSYSTEMSINECOLOGY4RENDS
%COL%VOL  
+OLA # 3 AND ,ODGE $ -  0ROGRESS IN INVASION BIOLOGY PREDICTING INVADERS
4RENDS%COL%VOL   
,AW 2AND-ORTON 2$ 0ERMANENCEANDTHEASSEMBLYOFECOLOGICALCOMMUNI
TIES%COLOGY   
,AW 2 7EATHERBY !*AND7ARREN 0( /NTHEINVASIBILITYOFPERSISTENTPROTIST
COMMUNITIES/IKOS   
 0(7ARREN 2,AWAND!*7EATHERBY

,AWLER 30 %COLOGYINABOTTLEUSINGMICROCOSMSTOTESTTHEORYPP )N


2ESETARITS 7 * AND "ERNADO * EDS %XPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY ISSUES AND PERSPECTIVES
/XFORD5NIVERSITY0RESS .EW9ORK
,EVINE *- 3PECIESDIVERSITYANDBIOLOGICALINVASIONSRELATINGLOCALPROCESSESTO
COMMUNITYPATTERNS3CIENCE  
,EVINE * - AND $!NTONIO # -  %LTON REVISITED A REVIEW OF EVIDENCE LINKING
DIVERSITYANDINVASIBILITY/IKOS  
,ONSDALE 7- 'LOBALPATTERNSOFPLANTINVASIONSANDTHECONCEPTOFINVASIBILITY
%COLOGY   
-ACK 2. 0REDICTINGTHEIDENTITYANDFATEOFPLANTINVADERSEMERGENTANDEMERG
INGAPPROACHES"IOL#ONSERV  
-ACK 2. 3IMBERLOFF $ ,ONSDALE -7 %VANS ( #LOUT -AND"AZAZZ &!
"IOTICINVASIONSCAUSES EPIDEMIOLOGY GLOBALCONSEQUENCES ANDCONTROL%COL!PPLIC
  
-C'RADY 3TEED * (ARRIS 0-AND-ORIN 0* "IODIVERSITYREGULATESECOSYSTEM
PREDICTABILITY.ATURE  
-ITCHELL # % AND 0OWER ! '  2ELEASE OF INVASIVE PLANTS FROM FUNGAL AND VIRAL
PATHOGENS.ATURE  
0ARKER ) $ 3IMBERLOFF $ ,ONSDALE 7 - 'OODELL + 7ONHAM - +AREIVA 0 -
7ILLIAMSON -( 6ON(OLLE " -OYLE 0" "YERS *%AND'OLDWASSER ,
)MPACTTOWARDAFRAMEWORKFORUNDERSTANDINGTHEECOLOGICALEFFECTSOFINVADERS"IOL
)NVASIONS  
0ETCHEY / , -C0HEARSON 0 4 #ASEY 4 - AND -ORIN 0 *  %NVIRONMENTAL
WARMINGALTERSFOODWEBSTRUCTUREANDECOSYSTEMFUNCTION.ATURE  
0ETERSEN * % AND (ASTINGS !  $IMENSIONAL APPROACHES TO SCALING EXPERIMENTAL
ECOSYSTEMS$ESIGNINGMOUSETRAPSTOCATCHELEPHANTS!M.AT  
0IMENTEL $ ,ACH , :UNIGA 2AND-ORRISON $ %NVIRONMENTALANDECONOMIC
COSTSOFNONINDIGENOUSSPECIESINTHE5NITED3TATES"IOSCIENCE  
0IMM 3 ,  4HEORIES OF PREDICTING SUCCESS AND IMPACT OF INTRODUCED SPECIES
PP   )N $RAKE * ! -OONEY ( ! DI #ASTI & 'ROVES 2 ( +RUGER & *
2EJMÉNEK -AND7ILLIAMSON -ED "IOLOGICALINVASIONSAGLOBALPERSPECTIVE3#/0%
*OHN7ILEYAND3ONS #HICHESTER 5+
0OST 7 - AND 0IMM 3 ,  #OMMUNITY ASSEMBLY AND FOOD WEB STABILITY -ATH
"IOSCI   
2EJMÉNEK - )NVASIBILITYOFPLANTCOMMUNITIES#HPP  )N$RAKE *!
-OONEY (! DI#ASTI & 'ROVES 2( +RUGER &* 2EJMÉNEK -AND7ILLIAMSON
- ED "IOLOGICAL INVASIONS A GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE3#/0%  *OHN 7ILEY AND 3ONS
#HICHESTER 5+
2OBINSON *6AND$ICKERSON*% 4ESTINGTHEINVULNERABILITYOFLABORATORYISLAND
COMMUNITIESTOINVASION/ECOLOGIA  
2OBINSON *6AND$ICKERSON *% $OESINVASIONSEQUENCEAFFECTCOMMUNITYSTRUC
TURE%COLOGY  
2OBINSON * 6 AND %DGEMON - !  !N EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF THE EFFECT OF
INVASIONHISTORYONCOMMUNITYSTRUCTURE%COLOGY  
)NVASIONSINMICROCOSMS 


3AKAI !+ !LLENDORF &7 (OLT *3 ,ODGE $- -OLOFSKY * 7ITH +! "AUGHMAN
3 #ABIN 2* #OHEN *% %LLSTRAND .# -C#AULEY $% /.EIL 0 0ARKER )-
4HOMPSON * . AND 7ELLER 3 '  4HE POPULATION BIOLOGY OF INVASIVE SPECIES
!NN2EV%COL3YST  
3HEA +AND#HESSON 0 #OMMUNITYECOLOGYTHEORYASAFRAMEWORKFORBIOLOGICAL
INVASIONS4RENDS%COL%VOL  
3HEA + AND 0OSSINGHAM ( 0  /PTIMAL RELEASE STRATEGIES FOR BIOLOGICAL CONTROL
AGENTSANAPPLICATIONOFSTOCHASTICDYNAMICPROGRAMMINGTOPOPULATIONMANAGEMENT
*!PPL%COL  
3HER ! ! AND (YATT , !  4HE DISTURBED RESOURCE mUX INVASION MATRIX A NEW
FRAMEWORKFORPATTERNSOFPLANTINVASION"IOL)NVASIONS   
3IMBERLOFF $ #OMMUNITYEFFECTSOFINTRODUCEDSPECIESPP )N.ITECKI -(
ED "IOTICCRISESINECOLOGICALANDEVOLUTIONARYTIME!CADEMIC0RESS .EW9ORK 53!
3IMBERLOFF $ 7HICHINSECTINTRODUCTIONSSUCCEEDANDWHICHFAIL#HPP 
)N$RAKE *! -OONEY (! DI#ASTI & 'ROVES 2( +RUGER &* 2EJMÉNEK -AND
7ILLIAMSON -ED "IOLOGICALINVASIONSAGLOBALPERSPECTIVE3#/0%*OHN7ILEY
AND3ONS #HICHESTER
3TAMPE %AND$AEHLER ## -YCORRHIZALSPECIESIDENTITYAFFECTSPLANTCOMMUNITY
STRUCTUREANDINVASIONAMICROCOSMSTUDY/IKOS  
4HOMPSON + (ODGSON *'AND'RIME *0AND"URKE-*7 0LANTTRAITSAND
TEMPORALSCALEEVIDENCEFROMA YEARINVASIONEXPERIMENTUSINGNATIVESPECIES*%COL
  
4ORCHIN - % ,AFFERTY + $ $OBSON ! 0 -C+ENZIE 6 * AND +URIS ! - 
)NTRODUCEDSPECIESANDTHEIRMISSINGPARASITES.ATURE  
6ITOUSEK 0 - AND 7ALKER , 2  "IOLOGICAL INVASION BY -YRICA FAYA IN (AWAII
PLANTDEMOGRAPHY NITROGENlXATION ECOSYSTEMEFFECTS%COL-ONOGR  
7ARDLE $ !  %XPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATION THAT PLANT DIVERSITY REDUCES INVASIBIL
ITY%VIDENCEOFABIOLOGICALMECHANISMORACONSEQUENCEOFSAMPLINGEFFECT/IKOS
  
7ARREN 0( $ISPERSALANDDESTRUCTIONINAMULTIPLEHABITATSYSTEMANDEXPERI
MENTALAPPROACHUSINGPROTISTCOMMUNITIES/IKOS  
7ARREN 0( ,AW 2AND7EATHERBY !* -APPINGTHEASSEMBLYOFPROTISTCOM
MUNITIESINMICROCOSMS%COLOGY  
7EATHERBY ! *  3PECIES COEXISTENCE AND COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY IN PROTIST MICRO
COSMSUNPUBLISHED0,$THESIS5NIVERSITYOF3HEFlELD 5+ 
7EATHERBY !* 7ARREN 0(AND,AW 2 #OEXISTENCEANDCOLLAPSEANEXPERI
MENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PERSISTENT COMMUNITIES OF A PROTIST SPECIES POOL * !NIM
%COL   
7EIHER %AND+EDDY 0EDS  %COLOGICALASSEMBLYRULESPERSPECTIVES ADVANCES
RETREATS#AMBRIDGE5NIVERSITY0RESS #AMBRIDGE 5+
7ILLIAMSON - "IOLOGICALINVASIONS#HAPMANAND(ALL,ONDON %NGLAND
:IMMERMANN #2 &UKAMI 4AND$RAKE *! !NEXPERIMENTALLY DERIVEDMAP
OF COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY SPACE )N -INAI ! AND "AR 9AM 9 EDS 5NIFYING THEMES
INCOMPLEXSYSTEMS))0ROCEEDINGSOFTHESECONDINTERNATIONALCONFERENCEONCOMPLEX
SYSTEMS.EW%NGLAND#OMPLEX3YSTEMS)NSTITUTE0ERSEUS0RESS
,ARGE SCALECONSEQUENCES
ANDPATTERNSOFINVASIONS

You might also like