You are on page 1of 16

0LANTPOPULATIONSBYPATHOGENS 

6ITOUSEK 0 - # - $!NTONIO , , ,OOPE AND 2 7ESTBROOKS  "IOLOGICAL INVA
SIONSASGLOBALENVIRONMENTALCHANGE!MERICAN3CIENTIST  
7APSHERE !* 3(ASAN 7+7AHBAAND,#ARESCHE4HEECOLOGYOF#HONDRILLA
JUNCEAINTHEWESTERN-EDITERRANEAN*OURNALOF!PPLIED%COLOGY  
7EBB # / $ $ !CKERLY - ! -C0EEK AND - * $ONOGHUE  0HYLOGENIES AND
COMMUNITYECOLOGY!NNUAL2EVIEWOF%COLOGYAND3YSTEMATICS  
7ESTE 'AND'#-ARKS4HEBIOLOGYOF0HYTOPHTHORACINNAMOMIIN!USTRALASIAN
FORESTS!NNUAL2EVIEWOF0HYTOPATHOLOGY  
7ILLIAMSON -("IOLOGICAL)NVASIONS#HAPMAN(ALL .EW9ORK
7ILLIS !* *-EMMOTTAND2)&ORRESTER)STHEREEVIDENCEFORTHEPOST INVASION
EVOLUTIONOFINCREASEDSIZEAMONGINVASIVEPLANTSPECIES%COLOGY,ETTERS  
7INGlELD -* "3LIPPERS *2OUXAND"$7INGlELD7ORLDWIDEMOVEMENTOF
EXOTIC FOREST FUNGI ESPECIALLY IN THE TROPICS AND THE SOUTHERN HEMISPHERE "IOSCIENCE
  
7OLFE , -  7HY ALIEN INVADERS SUCCEED 3UPPORT FOR THE ESCAPE FROM ENEMY
HYPOTHESIS!MERICAN.ATURALIST  
7RIGHT 3 *  0LANT DIVERSITY IN TROPICAL FORESTS A REVIEW OF MECHANISMS OF SPECIES
COEXISTENCE/ECOLOGIA  
#HAPTERFOURTEEN

%XPLORINGTHERELATIONSHIP
BETWEENNICHEBREADTH
ANDINVASIONSUCCESS

$06ÉZQUEZ

).42/$5#4)/.

4HE ULTIMATE GOAL OF INVASIONS BIOLOGY SHOULD BE TO GENERATE A BODY OF GENERAL
PREDICTIVE THEORY )DEALLY SUCH THEORY WOULD HELP DETERMINE WHETHER A SPECIES
WITHAPARTICULARSETOFTRAITSWILLBEABLETOINVADEAGIVENSYSTEM)NITSALMOST
lFTY YEARS THE DISCIPLINE HAS SEEN MANY ATTEMPTS TO PROVIDE SUCH PREDICTABILITY
THROUGH A FOCUS ON THE TRAITS OF THE POTENTIAL INVADERS AND THOSE OF THE INVADED
COMMUNITY2EGRETTABLY MOSTATTEMPTSHAVEBEENSOFARUNSUCCESSFUL
/NE ATTEMPT AT GENERALIZATION THAT HAS BEEN OFTEN DISCUSSED IN THE LITERATURE
IS THE IDEA THAT NICHE BREADTH IS POSITIVELY CORRELATED WITH INVASION SUCCESS SO
THATSPECIESWITHBROADNICHEShGENERALISTSv AREMORELIKELYTOINVADETHANSPE
CIESWITHNARROWERNICHEShSPECIALISTSv BECAUSETHEYAREMORELIKELYTOlNDTHE
NECESSARY RESOURCES OR ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS THROUGHOUT THIS PAPER ) WILL
REFERTOTHISNOTIONASTHEhNICHEBREADTHnINVASIONSUCCESSHYPOTHESISv!SWITH
MANY OTHER IDEAS IN ECOLOGY IT IS DIFlCULT TO TRACK THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT
OF THIS HYPOTHESIS 0ROBABLY ONE OF THE lRST TO INCLUDE SOME MEASURE OF NICHE
BREADTHINTHINKINGABOUTINVASIONSUCCESSWAS('"AKER"AKER 
DElNEDTHETRAITSOFWHATHECALLEDTHEhIDEALWEEDvˆSPECIESPRONETOBECOME

-7#ADOTTE ETAL EDS #ONCEPTUALECOLOGYANDINVASIONBIOLOGY n
¥3PRINGER0RINTEDINTHE.ETHERLANDS
 $06ÉZQUEZ

WEEDY AND INVADE DISTURBED HABITATS !MONG THESE TRAITS THREE WERE RELATED TO
NICHE BREADTH NAMELY I THAT THE SPECIES CAN PRODUCE SEEDS IN A WIDE RANGE OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CIRCUMSTANCES AND HAS HIGH TOLERANCE OF AND OFTEN PLASTICITY IN
FACEOF CLIMATICANDENVIRONMENTALVARIATIONII THATTHESPECIESHASNOSPECIAL
ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR GERMINATION IE WIDE ENVIRONMENTAL NICHE 
ANDIII THAT WHENCROSSPOLLINATED POLLINATIONCANBEACHIEVEDBYANONSPECIAL
IZEDmOWERVISITORORBYWINDIE WIDEPOLLINATIONNICHENOTE HOWEVER THATIT
ISASSUMINGWIDENICHEBREADTHOFPOLLINATORS NOTOFTHEPLANT WHICHBRINGSUP
THEISSUEOFASYMMETRICSPECIALIZATIONDISCUSSEDBELOW 
-ORERECENTLY 2EJMÉNEK PROPOSEDIDEASSIMILARTOTHOSEOF"AKERSIN
THE BROADER CONTEXT OF PLANT INVASIONS IN GENERAL (E DESCRIBED WHAT HE THINKS
ARETENMAJORPREDICTORSOFPLANTINVASIVENESS THREEOFWHICHARERELATEDTONICHE
BREADTH I hlTNESS HOMEOSTASIS v THE ABILITY OF AN INDIVIDUAL OR POPULATION TO
MAINTAINRELATIVELYCONSTANTlTNESSOVERARANGEOFENVIRONMENTSlTNESSHOMEO
STASIS WILL DEPEND ON PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY HOMEOSTASIS AT THE INDIVIDUAL LEVEL
AND POPULATION GENETIC POLYMORPHISM HOMEOSTASIS AT THE POPULATION LEVEL 
II SIZE OF hPRIMARYv NATIVE GEOGRAPHICAL RANGES SEE ALSO $AEHLER AND 3TRONG
 WHICH ULTIMATELY DEPENDS ON POPULATION lTNESS HOMEOSTASIS AND III
SPECIlCITYOFMUTUALISMS SOTHATSPECIESTHATDEPENDONNON SPECIlCMUTUALISMS
AREMORELIKELYTOOVERCOMEMANYABIOTICANDBIOTICBARRIERSINNEWENVIRONMENTS
SEEALSO2ICHARDSONETAL 
-ANYOTHERSHAVEDISCUSSEDTHEIDEATHATBROADERNICHESCONFERHIGHERINVA
SIONSUCCESS&OREXAMPLE INAREVIEWONBIOTICHOMOGENIZATION-C+INNEYAND
,OCKWOOD  CONCLUDED THAT EXTINCTIONnRESISTANT SPECIES AND SUCCESSFUL
INVADERSARECHARACTERIZEDBYOMNIVORY RAPIDGROWTHANDDISPERSALORBREEDING
IN EPHEMERAL HABITATS WHEREAS EXTINCTION PRONE GROUPS HAVE A PREDOMINANCE
OF TRAITS ASSOCIATED WITH SPECIALIZATION SLOW REPRODUCTION AND OTHER TRAITS NOT
ASSOCIATED WITH OPPORTUNISM 3IMILARLY 2ICHARDSON ET AL  STATED THAT
h)TISLOGICALTOPREDICTTHATPLANTSWITHSPECIALIZEDPOLLINATIONSYNDROMESARELESS
LIKELY TO BE POLLINATED IN FOREIGN ENVIRONMENTS THAN PLANTS WITHOUT SPECIALIZED
REQUIREMENTSv P   ,IKEWISE 2ICCIARDI AND 2ASMUSSEN  REGARD BROAD
GEOGRAPHIC ENVIRONMENTAL AND DIETARY RANGES AS GENERAL ATTRIBUTES OF INVASIVE
AQUATICSPECIES!LTHOUGHTHESEIDEASAREINTERESTINGANDAPPEALING THEIREVALU
ATION IS COMPLICATED BY SEVERAL CONCEPTUAL AND METHODOLOGICAL PROBLEMS ) WILL
ARGUETHATPROGRESSTOWARDSAPREDICTIVETHEORYOFINVASIONSWILLBEDIFlCULTUNLESS
THESEISSUESARERESOLVED
"ELOW ) PRESENT A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE SUMMARIZING SEVERAL STUDIES THAT
HAVE EVALUATED THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF NICHE BREADTH AND
INVASIONSUCCESS)THENPROVIDEACRITICALEXAMINATIONOFTHEMECHANISMSPOTEN
TIALLY INVOLVED IN GENERATING THESE RESULTS STRESSING SEVERAL CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
THAT HAVE BEEN OVERLOOKED IN PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS -Y REVIEW IS NOT EXHAUS
TIVE AND IS TAXONOMICALLY BIASED FOCUSING ON PLANTS BIRDS AND HETEROTROPHIC
MUTUALISTS OF PLANTS 4HIS BIAS REmECTS THE FACT THAT MOST STUDIES EVALUATING THIS
HYPOTHESIS HAVE DEALTWITH THESE GROUPS
)N SUMMARIZING THE AVAILABLE
LITERATURE


.ICHEBREADTHANDINVASIONSUCCESS 

) USE A VOTE COUNTING APPROACH BECAUSE THE NUMBER OF STUDIES AVAILABLE PER
TAXON AND MEASURE OF NICHE BREADTH WAS TOO SMALL TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION OF
MORE QUANTITATIVE META ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES SEE !RNQVIST AND 7OOSTER
 'UREVITCH ET AL  
4HE STUDIES REVIEWED HERE ARE BASED ON THREE DIFFERENT KINDS OF COMPARISONS
SOMEMEASUREOFNICHEBREADTHINNATIVEREGIONOFSUCCESSFULVSFAILEDINVADERS
3)VS&) NICHEBREADTHOFINVADERSINTHEIRNATIVEVSTHEIRINTRODUCEDREGIONS
.2VS)2 ANDNICHEBREADTHOFNATIVEVSINTRODUCEDSPECIESINTHEINTRODUCED
REGION.3VS)3 )TISIMPORTANTTONOTESEVERALSIMILARITIESANDDIFFERENCESABOUT
THE THREE APPROACHES 4HE lRST COMPARISON 3) VS &) USES A BINARY MEASURE OF
INVASION SUCCESS ASKING WHETHER SUCCESS IS EXPLAINED BY THE NICHE BREADTH IN
THENATIVERANGE)NCONTRAST THESECONDAPPROACH.2VS)2 USESAQUANTITA
TIVE MEASURE OF SUCCESS SUCH AS THE SIZE OF THE INTRODUCED RANGE TO DETERMINE
WHETHER INVASION SUCCESS IS EXPLAINED BY NICHE BREADTH IN THE NATIVE RANGE
4HETHIRDAPPROACH.3VS)3 COMPARESNICHEBREADTHOFINTRODUCEDSPECIESWITH
NATIVESPECIESINTHEINTRODUCEDRANGEIE SPECIESNATIVETOTHERECIPIENTCOMMU
NITY HERETHEQUESTIONISWHETHERTHESUCCESSOFINVADERSIE THEFACTTHATTHEY
ESTABLISHEDINANEWENVIRONMENT ISEXPLAINEDBYTHEIRBROADERNICHECOMPARED
TOTHATOFNATIVESPECIES INSHARPCONTRASTWITHTHEQUESTIONASKEDINTHEPREVI
OUSTWOAPPROACHES4HUS ALTHOUGHTHETHREETYPESOFCOMPARISONSAREINTENDED
TOADDRESSTHEQUESTIONOFWHETHERNICHEBREADTHOFPOTENTIALINVADERSISRELATED
TOTHEIRINVASIONSUCCESS THEYARENOTEQUIVALENTANDARELIKELYTOPROVIDEDIFFER
ENTANSWERS
-YREVIEWCONSISTSOFTHREEMAINPARTSI THEROLEOFGEOGRAPHIC HABITATAND
CLIMATIC RANGE ON PLANT AND BIRD INVASIONS II THE ROLE OF MUTUALISMS ON PLANT
AND POLLINATOR INVASIONS AND III THE ROLE OF TROPHIC BREADTH ON BIRD INVASIONS
)ENDWITHASECTIONSUMMARIZINGTHERESULTSOFTHEREVIEWANDOFFERINGCONCLUD
INGREMARKS

4(%2/,%/&'%/'2!0()# #,)-!4)#!.$(!")4!42!.'%

0ATTERNSSTUDIESONPLANTSANDBIRDS

3TUDIES THAT HAVE EVALUATED THE INVASION SUCCESS OF PLANTS AND ITS RELATIONSHIP
TO GEOGRAPHIC CLIMATIC OR HABITAT RANGE ARE BASED ON THE THREE TYPES OF COM
PARISONS OUTLINED ABOVE 3TUDIES BASED ON THE lRST TWO KINDS OF COMPARISONS
3) VS &) AND .2 VS )2 HAVE FOUND THAT INVASION SUCCESS IS POSITIVELY RELATED
TO NATIVE GEOGRAPHIC CLIMATIC OR HABITAT RANGE SO THAT MORE SUCCESSFUL INVAD
ERS TEND TO HAVE BROADER NATIVE RANGES THAN LESS SUCCESSFUL INVADERS 4ABLE  
)NGENERAL THESERESULTSSUPPORTTHENOTIONTHATTHENATIVERANGEOFPLANTSPECIES
ISAPREDICTOROFTHEIRSUCCESSASINVADERSINNEWREGIONSWHERETHEYDIDNOTOCCUR
NATURALLY$AEHLERAND3TRONG 2EJMÉNEK 
4ABLE 3TUDIESEVALUATINGTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENBREADTHOFGEOGRAPHIC CLIMATICORHABITATRANGEOFPLANTSPECIESANDINVASIONSUCCESS



4YPEOF -AJORTAXON .ATIVEREGION )NTRODUCED -EASUREOFSUCCESS -EASUREOFNICHE 2ELATWITH 2EF


COMPARISON
REGION BREADTH NICHEBREADTHe

3)VS&) (IGHERPLANTS #ENTRAL -ENDOZAAND %STABLISHMENTIN .ONATIVEHABITATTYPES 0OSITIVE 
%UROPE "UENOS!IRES NEWREGION
PROVINCES !RGENTINA

!NGIOSPERMS %UROPE .EW"RUNSWICK %STABLISHMENTIN 3IZEOFNATIVERANGE 0OSITIVE 


#ANADA NEWREGION

.2VS)2 #OMPOSITAE %URASIA .ORTH 3IZEOFINTRODUCED .ONATIVEHABITATTYPES 0OSITIVE 


'RAMINEAE !MERICA RANGE

!NGIOSPERMS 3OUTH!FRICA !USTRALIA 7EEDSTATUS .ONATIVEHABITATTYPES 0OSITIVE 

!NGIOSPERMS 3OUTH!FRICA !USTRALIA 7EEDSTATUS .OCLIMATICZONES 0OSITIVE 


$06ÉZQUEZ

"ROMUS -EDITERRANEAN -EDITERRANEAN .OCLIMATICZONES .O-EDITERRANEAN 0OSITIVE 


REGIONS REGIONS INNATIVERANGE REGIONSOCCUPIED

.3VS)3 (IGHERPLANTS 7ORLD(AWAII (AWAII .OOFHABITAT .OHABITATTYPES .EGATIVE 


TYPESOCCUPIED

2EFERENCES  0RINZING ET AL    2EJMÉNEK    3COTT AND 0ANETTA    'OODWIN ET AL    2OY ET AL  
 +ITAYAMAAND-UELLER $OMBOIS 

#OMPARISONS INCLUDED 3) VS &) NATIVE RANGE OF SUCCESSFULLY ESTABLISHED SPECIES VS UNSUCCESSFULLY ESTABLISHED SPECIES .2 VS )2 NATIVE
RANGEVSINTRODUCEDRANGEOFINTRODUCEDSPECIES.3VS)3RANGEOFNATIVEVSINTRODUCEDSPECIESINTHEINTRODUCEDREGION
e
)NDICATESSTATISTICALSIGNIlCANCEOFTESTANDDIRECTIONOFEFFECT0OSITIVE SIGNIlCANTEFFECTINTHEDIRECTIONEXPECTEDBYTHESPECIALIZATIONnNICHE
BREADTHHYPOTHESIS.EGATIVE SIGNIlCANTEFFECTINTHEDIRECTIONOPPOSITETOTHEEXPECTEDBYTHESPECIALIZATIONnNICHEBREADTHHYPOTHESIS
.I CHEBREADTHANDINVASIONSUCCESS 

)N CONTRAST THE ONE STUDY COMPARING BREADTH OF HABITAT USE BY NATIVE AND
INTRODUCEDSPECIES.3VS)34ABLE FOUNDAPATTERNOPPOSITETOTHEPREDICTION
OFTHENICHEBREADTHnINVASIONSUCCESSHYPOTHESISINTRODUCEDSPECIESWEREFOUND
IN FEWER HABITAT TYPES THAN NATIVE SPECIES 4HIS RESULT IS DIFlCULT TO INTERPRET
HOWEVER MAINLYBECAUSETHENUMBEROFHABITATSINWHICHASPECIESISFOUNDWILL
DEPENDONITSDISPERSALABILITYANDTHETIMEELAPSEDAFTERITSARRIVALTOTHEENVIRON
MENT WHICH MAY OBVIOUSLY BIAS THE RESULTS TOWARDS NATIVE SPECIES GIVEN THEIR
LONGERPRESENCEINTHESTUDYAREA
3TUDIES EVALUATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GEOGRAPHIC CLIMATIC OR HABITAT
RANGEANDINVASIONSUCCESSINBIRDS4ABLE ALLUSEDTHElRSTAPPROACHOUTLINED
ABOVETHATIS THEYCOMPARETHESIZEOFTHENATIVERANGEBETWEENSUCCESSFULAND
UNSUCCESSFULINVADERS3)VS&) 4HESESTUDIESHAVEUSEDEITHERSIZEOFNATIVEGEO
GRAPHICRANGE NUMBEROFNATIVEHABITATTYPES ORCLIMATICZONESOCCUPIEDINTHE
NATIVEREGIONASMEASURESOFNICHEBREADTH
)N AGREEMENT WITH STUDIES ON PLANTS DISCUSSED ABOVE STUDIES OF BIRD INVA
SIONSIN(AWAII !USTRALIAANDWORLDWIDEFOUNDAPOSITIVERELATIONSHIPBETWEEN
INVASION SUCCESS AND SIZE OF NATIVE GEOGRAPHIC RANGE USED IN THE NATIVE RANGE
4ABLE   (OWEVER TWO STUDIES ONE IN FOUR OCEANIC ISLANDS AND THE OTHER IN
.EW :EALAND FAILED TO lND EVIDENCE FOR SUCH AN EFFECT 4ABLE   4HE TWO STUD
IES USING THE NUMBER OF HABITAT TYPES OCCUPIED IN THE NATIVE RANGE FOUND THAT
SUCCESSFULLYINVADINGSPECIESORFAMILIESHADSIGNIlCANTLYGREATERNATIVEHABITAT
RANGESTHANSPECIESORFAMILIESTHATFAILEDTOINVADE4ABLE 
)NSUMMARY ITAPPEARSTHATBREADTHOFNATIVEGEOGRAPHIC CLIMATICANDHABITAT
RANGEISRELATEDTOTHEINVASIONSUCCESSOFPLANTANDBIRDSPECIES!LTHOUGHTHERE
AREEXCEPTIONSTOTHESEPATTERNS THEYAPPEARTOHAVESOMEDEGREEOFGENERALITY

-ECHANISMS

7HYDOESBREADTHOFNATIVEGEOGRAPHIC HABITATORCLIMATERANGEAFFECTINVASION
SUCCESS 3PECIES WITH BROAD RANGES MAY BE MORE SUCCESSFUL INVADERS THAN SPE
CIESWITHNARROWERRANGESFORSEVERALREASONS!SDISCUSSEDINTHEINTRODUCTION
SPECIES NICHES MAY DETERMINE THEIR DISTRIBUTION SO THAT SPECIES WITH BROADER
NICHES TEND TO HAVE BROADER DISTRIBUTIONS AND ARE SO MORE LIKELY TO INVADE NEW
ENVIRONMENTSSEEALSO"ROWN 
(OWEVER OTHER FACTORS NOT RELATED TO NICHE BREADTH MAY ALSO AFFECT SPECIES
DISTRIBUTIONS 5NDER THESE SCENARIOS WIDESPREAD SPECIES WOULD HAVE HIGHER
INVASION SUCCESS REGARDLESS OF THEIR NICHE BREADTH &IRST SPECIES SPECIALIZED ON
WIDESPREADRESOURCES ORSPECIESTHATAREABLETOLIVEUNDERENVIRONMENTALCHAR
ACTERISTICSTHATSPANLARGEAREAS MAYHAVEWIDEDISTRIBUTIONSINSPITEOFHAVING
ANARROWTOLERANCETOENVIRONMENTALCONDITIONSOROFBEINGABLETOUSEANARROW
RANGE OF RESOURCES (ANSKI ET AL  'ASTON ET AL   4HIS MECHANISM
IS PARTICULARLY IMPORTANT FOR SPECIES THAT ARE ABLE TO EXPLOIT HUMAN DOMINATED
ECOSYSTEMS WHICH ARE THEMSELVES VERY WIDESPREAD 3OL ET AL   3ECOND
HIGH DISPERSAL ABILITY CAN ALSO LEAD TO WIDE GEOGRAPHIC RANGES AT LEAST IN SOME
GROUPS WHEREASLIMITEDDISPERSALCANRESULTINGEOGRAPHICRANGESMUCHNARROWER
4ABLE 3TUDIESEVALUATINGTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENBREADTHOFGEOGRAPHIC HABITATRANGE TROPHICORBEHAVIORALBREADTHOFBIRDSPECIESAND
INVASIONSUCCESS



-EASUREOFNICHEBREADTH 4AXONOMICLEVELOFANALYSIS )NTRODUCEDREGION 2ELATIONSHIPWITHNICHEBREADTHe 2EF

3IZEOFNATIVERANGE 3PECIES (AWAII 0OSITIVE 
!USTRALIA 0OSITIVE 
.EW:EALAND .3 
&OUROCEANICISLANDS .3 
7ORLD 0OSITIVE 
o
&AMILIES 7ORLD 0OSITIVE 
.ONATIVEHABITATTYPES 3PECIES 7ORLD 0OSITIVE 
o
&AMILIES 7ORLD 0OSITIVE 
A
$IETBREADTH 3PECIES .EW:EALAND .3 
B
$06ÉZQUEZ

.INEOCEANICISLANDS 0OSITIVE 
o C
&AMILIES 7ORLD 0OSITIVE 

"EHAVIORALmEXIBILITY 3PECIES 7ORLD 0OSITIVE  



2EFERENCES -OULTONAND0IMM  $UNCANETAL  6ELTMANETAL  ,OCKWOODETAL  "LACKBURNAND
$UNCAN  #ASSEY  "ROOKS  -C,AINETAL  3OLAND,EFEBVRE  3OLETAL 
-EASURESOFDIETBREADTHUSEDINSTUDIESA$IETBREADTHMEASUREDASCARNIVOREORHERBIVORESPECIALIST ANDOMNIVOREGENERALIST B$IETBREADTH
MEASUREDASFRUGIVOREORGRANIVORESPECIALIST ANDOMNIVOREEATINGFRUITSANDSEEDSGENERALIST AFOURTHCATEGORYWASINCLUDEDFORSPECIES
THATFEDONNEITHERFRUITSORNECTAR C$IETBREADTHMEASUREDASNUMBEROFSEVENMAJORFOODTYPESCONSUMED
e
)NDICATESSTATISTICALSIGNIlCANCEOFTESTANDDIRECTIONOFEFFECT0OSITIVE SIGNIlCANTEFFECTINTHEDIRECTIONEXPECTEDBYTHESPECIALIZATIONnNICHE
BREADTHHYPOTHESIS.3 STATISTICALLYNONSIGNIlCANTRESULT
o
#ASSEY ALSODIDANALYSESATSPECIESLEVEL(OWEVER HISSPECIES LEVELMULTIVARIATEANALYSESAREMOSTLYDESCRIPTIVE ANDAREDIFlCULTTO
COMPAREWITHOTHERSTUDIESLISTEDINTHETABLEANDWERETHEREFORENOTINCLUDED
.I CHEBREADTHANDINVASIONSUCCESS 

THANWOULDBEPREDICTEDBASEDONASPECIESNICHE'ASTON 4HUS SPECIES


WITHHIGHDISPERSALABILITIESMAYTENDTOHAVEBOTHWIDENATIVERANGESANDHIGH
CHANCES OF COLONIZING AND SPREADING IN NEW ENVIRONMENTS 4HIRD SPECIES WITH
WIDERNATIVERANGESMAYBEMORELIKELYTOBETRANSPORTEDTONEWAREASBYHUMANS
THROUGH PASSIVE SAMPLING 0RINZING ET AL  PARTICULARLY CONSIDERING THAT
WIDESPREADSPECIESALSOTENDTOBELOCALLYABUNDANT'ASTONETAL #ASSEY
ET AL  HAVE RECENTLY SHOWN THAT PROPAGULE PRESSURE OF INTRODUCED BIRDS
EXPLAINS INVASION SUCCESS WORLDWIDE THESE AUTHORS ALSO FOUND THAT PROPAGULE
PRESSURE IS POSITIVELY RELATED TO GEOGRAPHIC AND TROPHIC BREADTH AND SO THESE
MEASURESOFNICHEBREADTHARENOTINDEPENDENTOFPROPAGULEPRESSUREANDCOULD
BECONFOUNDEDWITHIT5NDERSTANDINGTHEROLEOFTHEHABITATANDCLIMATICCOMPO
NENTSOFNICHEBREADTHINDETERMININGINVASIONSUCCESSWILLREQUIRETEASINGAPART
THESEFACTORS

4(%2/,%/&30%#)!,):!4)/.).-545!,)34)#).4%2!#4)/.3

0ATTERNS

3EVERALSTUDIESHAVEEVALUATEDTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENSPECIALIZATIONINMUTU
ALISTIC INTERACTIONS AND INVASION SUCCESS OF PLANTS ANDOR ANIMAL MUTUALISTS
2ICHARDSONETAL HAVEREVIEWEDTHEROLEOFMUTUALISMSINFACILITATINGPLANT
INVASIONS4HEIRREVIEWSUGGESTSTHATPLANTSWITHEXTREMELYSPECIALIZEDMUTUAL
ISTICINTERACTIONSINCLUDINGINTERACTIONSWITHPOLLINATORS SEEDDISPERSERS MYCOR
RHIZALFUNGIANDNITROGEN lXINGBACTERIA MAYBEPREVENTEDFROMESTABLISHINGAND
SPREADINGINANEWENVIRONMENT(OWEVER THERARITYOFEXTREMESPECIALIZATIONIN
MUTUALISTICINTERACTIONSMAYGREATLYMINIMIZETHEPOTENTIALROLEOFMUTUALISMSIN
LIMITINGPLANTINVASIONSUCCESS
/NEOFTHEEXAMPLESOFHOWEXTREMELYSPECIALIZEDMUTUALISTICINTERACTIONSMAY
PREVENTTHEESTABLISHMENTANDSPREADOFINTRODUCEDPLANTPOPULATIONSDISCUSSED
BY 2ICHARDSON ET AL  IS THE INVASION ECOLOGY OF lGS &ICUS -ORACEAE 
/FTHESIXTYSPECIESOF&ICUSINTRODUCEDTO&LORIDA 53! ONLYTHREEHAVEBECOME
INVASIVE AND THEY HAVE DONE SO ONLY AFTER THE ACCIDENTAL INTRODUCTION OF THEIR
SPECIlC WASP SEE 2ICHARDSON ET AL  AND REFERENCES THEREIN  (OWEVER
2ICHARDSONETALALSODISCUSSTHECASEOF&LUTEAIN3OUTH!FRICA WHEREONEISO
LATEDFEMALEINDIVIDUALOFTHISNONINDIGENOUSSPECIESHASBEENPOLLINATEDBYWASPS
THAT WERE NOT ITS NORMAL POLLINATOR !LTHOUGH IN THIS CASE THE ABSENCE OF MALE
INDIVIDUALS PREVENTED REPRODUCTION HYBRIDS WITH NATIVE &ICUS DID NOT PRODUCE
VIABLESEEDLINGS SPREADMIGHTHAVEBEENPOSSIBLEIFMALEINDIVIDUALSOF&LUTEA
HADALSOBEENINTRODUCED!SASIDENOTE 2ICHARDSONETAL POINTOUTTHAT
SEVERALPINESPECIES0INUSSPP NATIVETO.ORTH!MERICAANDTHE-EDITERRANEAN
"ASIN THAT ARE WIND DISPERSED IN THEIR NATIVE RANGES ARE DISPERSED BY COCKATOOS
IN!USTRALIA!LTHOUGHBIRDSDESTROYMOSTOFTHESEEDS SOMESURVIVETOESTABLISH
ISOLATED FOCI IN HABITATS EUCALYPT FORESTS THAT THEY WOULD OTHERWISE NOT HAVE
 $06ÉZQUEZ

BEENABLETOINVADE4HUS EVENAPPARENTEXTREMESPECIALIZATIONONAPARTICULAR
POLLENVECTORFIGWASP ORSEEDDISPERSALAGENTWIND MAYNOTPRECLUDESURVIVAL
ANDSUCCESSFULREPRODUCTIONINANEWENVIRONMENT
!LBEITINTRIGUING THEEXTREMESPECIALIZATIONOBSERVEDFOR&ICUSISNOTREPRESEN
TATIVE OF THE MAJORITY OF POLLINATION INTERACTIONS 7ASER ET AL  AND MOST
SPECIES WITHIN A COMMUNITY FALL SOMEWHERE ALONG A GRADIENT THAT SPANS FROM
EXTREMESPECIALIZATIONTOEXTREMEGENERALIZATION"ASCOMPTEETAL *ORDANO
ETAL 6ÉZQUEZAND!IZEN A !SIMILARSITUATIONOCCURSINSEED
DISPERSAL MUTUALISMS "ASCOMPTE ET AL   4HE QUESTION IS WHETHER SPECIES
LOCATEDTOWARDSTHESPECIALIZEDEXTREMEOFTHECONTINUUMARELESSLIKELYTOINVADE
SUCCESSFULLYTHANMOREGENERALIZEDSPECIES
)N A RECENT REVIEW OF INTRODUCED BEES AND THEIR ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS 'OULSON
 POINTS OUT THAT MOST INTRODUCED BEE SPECIES APPEAR QUITE GENERALIZED
'OULSONARGUESTHATAMONGBEES WHICHDEPENDONmORALFOODRESOURCESTHROUGH
OUT THEIR ENTIRE LIFE CYCLES DIETARY GENERALIZATION SEEMS TO BE A PRECONDITION FOR
BECOMINGSUCCESSFULINVADERS(OWEVER THISINTERPRETATIONSHOULDBETAKENWITH
CAUTION!LLSPECIESOFBEESKNOWNTOHAVEBEENINTRODUCEDOUTSIDETHEIRNATIVE
RANGESTHEHONEYBEE lVEBUMBLEBEES TENMEGACHILLIDSANDONEHALICTID HAVE
BEENPURPOSEFULLYINTRODUCEDBYHUMANSTOENHANCECROPPOLLINATION USUALLYOF
SEVERALSPECIES'IVENTHISGOAL DIETARYGENERALIZATIONOFINTRODUCEDBEESISPROB
ABLYADESIRABLETRAIT ANDITISTHEREFOREDIFlCULTTOTEASEAPARTTHEEFFECTOFHUMAN
SELECTIONFROMTHEEFFECTOFDIETARYSPECIALIZATIONONINVASIONSUCCESS
!NOTHERWAYOFEVALUATINGTHENICHEBREADTHnINVASIONSUCCESSHYPOTHESISAS
ITAPPLIESTOMUTUALISTICINTERACTIONSISBYCOMPARINGTHEDEGREEOFSPECIALIZATION
INMUTUALISTICINTERACTIONSBETWEENNATIVEANDINTRODUCEDSPECIESINAGIVENAREA
4HE EXPECTATION UNDER THE NICHE BREADTHnINVASION SUCCESS HYPOTHESIS IS THAT
INTERACTIONSARELESSSPECIlCFORINTRODUCEDTHANFORNATIVESPECIESBECAUSEEXOTIC
SPECIES WITH MORE SPECIlC INTERACTIONS MAY HAVE BEEN hlLTERED OUTv DURING THE
ESTABLISHMENTPROCESS )HAVEFOUNDSTUDIESINFOURSYSTEMSATTEMPTINGTOANSWER
THISQUESTIONBYCOMPARINGTHEDEGREEOFSPECIALIZATIONOFPLANTANDORPOLLINATORS
BETWEENNATIVEANDINTRODUCEDSPECIESIE A.3VS)3COMPARISONSEEABOVE 
)NADDITION )HAVEFOUNDCOMPARABLEDATAFORAlFTHSYSTEM FORWHICH)CALCULATED
DEGREE OF SPECIALIZATION IN A WAY COMPARABLE TO THE OTHER STUDIES 4HESE STUD
IES ARE SUMMARIZED IN 4ABLE  .ONE OF THE STUDIES SUPPORT THE NICHE BREADTHn
INVASIONSUCCESSHYPOTHESIS ANDINSOMECASESTHEOBSERVEDPATTERNWASCONTRARY
TOTHEEXPECTATIONIE INTRODUCEDSPECIESHADMORESPECIlCINTERACTIONS 4HUS
THE FEW AVAILABLE STUDIES TELL US THAT INTERACTION SPECIlCITY OF INTRODUCED PLANTS
ANDPOLLINATORSDOESNOTINmUENCETHEIRINVASIONSUCCESS

-ECHANISMS

&ROMTHESTUDIESREVIEWEDABOVEEVALUATINGTHEROLEOFMUTUALISMSININVASIONS
ITAPPEARSTHATONLYEXTREMELYSPECIALIZEDMUTUALISMSHAVETHEPOTENTIALTOINmU
ENCEINVASIONSUCCESS ANDINGENERALSPECIlCITYOFMUTUALISTICINTERACTIONSDOES

4ABLE 3TUDIESTHATHAVECOMPAREDDEGREEOFSPECIALIZATIONOFPLANTSORPOLLINATORSBETWEENNATIVEANDINTRODUCEDSPECIES

-EANNUMBEROFMUTUALISTSPECIES

)NTRODUCEDREGION -AJORTAXON .ATIVE %XOTIC 2ESULTOFSTATISTICALTESTe 2EF

)LLINOIS 53! !NGIOSPERMS   .EGATIVE 

.AHUEL(UAPI !RGENTINA !NGIOSPERMS   .3 

'ALÉPAGOS)SLANDS !NGIOSPERMS   .EGATIVE 

)LEAUX!IGRETTES -AURITIUS !NGIOSPERMS   .3 

&LORES)SLAND !ZORES!ZORES !NGIOSPERMS   .3 

.AHUEL(UAPI !RGENTINA (YMENOPTERARARESPECIESEXCLUDED   .3 

.AHUEL(UAPI !RGENTINA (YMENOPTERA!PIDAEONLY   .3 

&LORES)SLAND !ZORES!ZORES 0OLLINATORS   .3 


.I CHEBREADTHANDINVASIONSUCCESS

)LEAUX!IGRETTES -AURITIUS 0OLLINATORS   .3 



2EFERENCES -EMMOTTAND7ASER  -ORALESAND!IZEN  -C-ULLEN  /LESENETAL 
e
)NDICATES STATISTICAL SIGNIlCANCE OF TEST AND DIRECTION OF EFFECT .EGATIVE SIGNIlCANT EFFECT IN THE DIRECTION OPPOSITE TO THE EXPECTED BY
THESPECIALIZATIONnNICHEBREADTHHYPOTHESIS.3 STATISTICALLYNONSIGNIlCANTRESULT

 $06ÉZQUEZ

NOTSEEMTOINmUENCEINVASIONSUCCESSSIGNIlCANTLY4HESERESULTSCONTRASTWITH
THOSEOBTAINEDINSTUDIESEVALUATINGTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENGEOGRAPHIC HABITAT
ORCLIMATICRANGEANDINVASIONSUCCESSREVIEWEDINTHEPREVIOUSSECTION(OWCAN
WE EXPLAIN THESE CONTRASTING RESULTS 7HY DOES NARROW CLIMATIC OR GEOGRAPHIC
RANGEAPPEARTOTRANSLATEINTOLOWLIKELIHOODOFINVASION WHEREASNARROWRANGE
OF MUTUALISTIC INTERACTIONS DOES NOT 4HE ANSWER TO THIS QUESTION MAY REQUIRE
SOME CONCEPTUAL RElNEMENTS IN OUR THINKING ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN
NICHEBREADTHANDINVASIONSUCCESSASITAPPLIESTOMUTUALISM
&IRST WENEEDTODISTINGUISHBETWEENTHEFUNDAMENTALANDTHEREALIZEDNICHE
(UTCHINSON )NTHECONTEXTOFSPECIESINTERACTIONS FUNDAMENTALSPECIAL
IZATION REFERS TO THE POTENTIAL INTERACTIONS THAT WOULD LEAD TO POSITIVE lTNESS FOR
A GIVEN SPECIES UNDER ANY POSSIBLE ECOLOGICAL CIRCUMSTANCES VAN +LINKEN AND
%DWARDS  6ÉZQUEZ AND !IZEN B 6ÉZQUEZ   4HUS FUNDAMENTAL
SPECIALIZATION WILL ULTIMATELY DEPEND ON THE GENETIC BACKGROUND OF A SPECIES
WHEREASREALIZEDSPECIALIZATIONREFERSTOTHEACTUALSPECIALIZATIONATTAINEDUNDER
APARTICULARECOLOGICALCONTEXT&OREXAMPLE MOSTFIGSPECIESAREFUNDAMENTALLY
SPECIALIZEDONONEORAFEWSPECIESOFPOLLINATINGWASPSTHEYFAILTOREPRODUCEIF
THEYAREMOVEDTODIFFERENTENVIRONMENTS UNLESSTHEIRSPECIALIZEDPOLLINATORSARE
INTRODUCEDASWELL#ONVERSELY MANYOTHERPLANTSPECIESTHATAREPOLLINATEDBYA
SINGLEPOLLINATORINAPARTICULARHABITATAREOFTENPOLLINATEDBYADIFFERENTSPECIES
INOTHERHABITATSWHERETHEYAREINTRODUCED2ICHARDSONETAL 2EGRETTABLY
THEBESTWECANDOINTHElELDISTOMEASURETHEREALIZEDNICHE BUTIFWEWANTTO
PREDICTINVASIONSWHATWENEEDTOKNOWISTHEFUNDAMENTALNICHE)NOTHERWORDS
KNOWINGTHENICHEBREADTHOFASPECIESINAPARTICULARENVIRONMENTDOESNOTTELL
USWHATTHEREALIZEDNICHEWILLBEINANOTHERENVIRONMENT!LTHOUGHSTUDYINGTHE
CLIMATIC COMPONENT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL NICHE MAY BE POSSIBLE BY FOR EXAMPLE
EXPERIMENTALLY GROWING A SPECIES UNDER A WIDE RANGE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDI
TIONS DOING SO IN THE CONTEXT OF SPECIES INTERACTIONS MAY BE SIMPLY UNFEASIBLE
BECAUSEITWOULDREQUIREEXPOSINGTHESPECIESTOALLPOSSIBLECOMBINATIONSOFINTER
ACTION PARTNERS THAT IT COULD ENCOUNTER IN ANY GIVEN ENVIRONMENT %VEN MANY
SPECIESSELECTEDASBIOCONTROLAGENTS WHICHAREUSUALLYSELECTEDTOBESPECIALISTS
EXHIBITUNEXPECTEDHOSTSHIFTSINTHEIRINTRODUCEDRANGES3IMBERLOFFAND3TILING
 (ENNEMANAND-EMMOTT VAN+LINKENAND%DWARDS 0EARSON
AND#ALLAWAY ANDTHESESHIFTSAREUSUALLYNOTTHERESULTOFCHANGESINTHE
FUNDAMENTALNICHETHROUGHRAPIDEVOLUTION BUTANEXPRESSIONOFADIFFERENTREAL
IZEDNICHEUNDERTHENEWENVIRONMENTVAN+LINKENAND%DWARDS 
3ECOND AS)POINTEDOUTABOVE SPECIESTHATUSEWIDESPREADRESOURCES LIVEUNDER
WIDESPREADENVIRONMENTALCONDITIONSORUSEWIDESPREADHABITATSARELIKELYTOBE
WIDESPREAD THEMSELVES 4HIS IDEA CAN BE EASILY EXTENDED TO SPECIES INTERACTIONS
TOARGUETHATSPECIESTHATSPECIALIZEONWIDESPREADMUTUALISTSMAYTHEMSELVESBE
WIDESPREAD!NEMERGINGPATTERNINPLANT ANIMALMUTUALISTICINTERACTIONSISTHE
EXISTENCEOFHIGHLYASYMMETRICSPECIALIZATION WHEREBYSPECIALISTSTENDTOSPECIAL
IZEONGENERALISTS"ASCOMPTEETAL 6ÉZQUEZAND!IZENA 'IVENTHAT
ABUNDANT FREQUENTLY INTERACTING SPECIES TEND TO BE MORE GENERALIZED THAN RARE
.I CHEBREADTHANDINVASIONSUCCESS 

SPECIES$UPONTETAL 6ÉZQUEZAND!IZEN A ANDTHATLOCALLY


ABUNDANT SPECIES TEND TO BE GEOGRAPHICALLY WIDESPREAD 'ASTON ET AL 
SPECIESSPECIALIZEDONWIDESPREADMUTUALISTSWILLHAVEAGREATERCHANCEOFlNDING
THEIRMUTUALISTSINTHEIRINTRODUCEDREGION4HESEGENERALFEATURESOFMUTUALISTIC
INTERACTIONS MAY SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE THE LIKELIHOOD OF SUCCESSFUL INVASION BY
SPECIESTHATARERELATIVELYSPECIALIZEDONTHEIRMUTUALISTS

4(%2/,%/&42/0()#"2%!$4(

0ATTERNS

!NOTHERASPECTOFTHENICHETHATCANPOTENTIALLYAFFECTINVASIONSUCCESSISDIETARY
BREADTH AND IT IS FREQUENTLY LISTED AS ONE POTENTIAL CHARACTERISTIC OF SUCCESS
FUL INVADERS %HRLICH  2ICCIARDI AND 2ASMUSSEN  -C+INNEY AND
,OCKWOOD )DISCUSSHEREAFEWSTUDIESTHATHAVEADDRESSEDTHISISSUEINTHE
CONTEXTOFBIRDINVASIONS
4OMYKNOWLEDGE THREESTUDIESHAVEEVALUATEDTHERELATIONSHIPBETWEENINVA
SIONSUCCESSANDDIETBREADTH4ABLE 4HESESTUDIESCOMPAREDTROPHICBREADTH
INTHENATIVEREGIONOFSUCCESSFULVSFAILEDINVADERS3)VS&) -C,AINETAL
DElNED SPECIALISTS AS SPECIES FEEDING ON EITHER FRUITS OR SEEDS AND GENERALISTS AS
SPECIES FEEDING ON BOTH THEY FOUND THAT TROPHIC GENERALISTS WERE MORE LIKELY TO
BE SUCCESSFUL INVADERS OF OCEANIC ISLANDS THAN TROPHIC SPECIALISTS 6ELTMAN ET AL
 DElNED HERBIVOROUS OR CARNIVOROUS SPECIES AS DIETARY SPECIALISTS AND
OMNIVORES SPECIES FEEDING ON BOTH PLANT AND ANIMAL MATERIAL AS GENERALISTS
THEYFAILEDTOlNDASTATISTICALEFFECTOFSIZEOFNATIVETROPHICRANGEONTHESUCCESSOF
BIRDSINTRODUCEDIN.EW:EALAND&INALLY #ASSEY DElNEDDIETARYBREADTH
ASTHENUMBEROFFOODTYPESCONSUMEDOUTOFSEVENPOSSIBLECATEGORIES(EFOUND
AWEAKBUTSIGNIlCANTEFFECTOFDIETARYBREADTHEXPLAININGTHEINVASIONSUCCESSOF
BIRDFAMILIES

-ECHANISMS

&ROMTHISLIMITEDNUMBERSTUDIESANDFROMTHEIRDISPARATERESULTS ITISDIFlCULTTO
MAKEGENERALIZATIONSABOUTTHEIMPORTANCEOFTROPHICBREADTHFORINVASIONSUC
CESS &URTHERMORE A MAJOR LIMITATION OF THE STUDIES DISCUSSED ABOVE IS THAT THE
MEASUREOFSPECIALIZATIONUSEDISPROBABLYTOOCOARSEANDMAYTHEREFOREBEAPOOR
SURROGATEOFTRUETROPHICSPECIALIZATION&OREXAMPLE INTHESTUDYBY-C,AINETAL
 ONLYFRUITSANDSEEDSARECONSIDEREDTOCHARACTERIZEDIETBREADTH ALTHOUGH
THEAUTHORSSTATETHAThVIRTUALLYALLINTRODUCEDSPECIES;INTHESEISLANDS=EATSOME
INSECTSANDOFTENOTHERINVERTEBRATESvP 4HUS ITISUNCLEARWHETHERWHAT
THEAUTHORSMEASUREDACTUALLYREPRESENTSDIETBREADTH ORRATHERWHETHERITREPRE
SENTSSOMETHINGELSERELATEDTOEATINGFRUITSORSEEDS)NFACT THEQUANTIlCATIONOF
DEGREEOFSPECIALIZATIONISPROBABLY O NEOFTHE MAIN
CONCEPTUAL
ANDMETHODOLOGICAL

 $06ÉZQUEZ

HURDLESINTHESTUDY OF SPECIES INTERACTIONS -ARTINEZ ET AL  .OVOTNâ ET AL
 6ÉZQUEZAND!IZENB -ANYIDEASINECOLOGY EVOLUTIONANDBIOGEOG
RAPHYDEPENDONASSUMPTIONSABOUTTHEDEGREEOFSPECIALIZATIONOFSPECIESINTER
ACTIONS &OR EXAMPLE BECAUSE THE BULK OF THE %ARTHS SPECIES ARE BELIEVED TO BE
TROPICALHERBIVOROUSINSECTS ESTIMATESOFTHENUMBEROFSPECIESON%ARTHDEPEND
CRITICALLYONASSUMPTIONSABOUTTHEIRDEGREEOFSPECIALIZATION4HEREALIZATIONTHAT
TROPICALHERBIVOROUSINSECTSWERELESSSPECIALIZEDTHANPREVIOUSLYTHOUGHTLEDTO
REVISINGTHEESTIMATEDNUMBEROFGLOBALSPECIESFROMMILLION%RWIN TO
APPROXIMATELYMILLIONŒDEGAARD .OVOTNâETAL 
4O CIRCUMVENT THE PROBLEM OF THE MEASUREMENT OF TROPHIC SPECIALIZATION IN
BIRDS 3OLAND,EFEBVRE AND3OLETAL PROPOSEDTHEUSEOFhBEHAVIOR
ALmEXIBILITYvASASURROGATEOFTROPHICBREADTH4HESEAUTHORSDElNEDBEHAVIORAL
mEXIBILITYAShTHEFREQUENCYOFNEWANDUNUSUALFEEDINGBEHAVIORSREPORTEDINTHE
SHORTNOTESECTIONOFORNITHOLOGYJOURNALSv3OLETAL P 4HEYARGUE
THAT A TAXONOMIC GROUP IN WHICH LARGE NUMBERS OF NEW FEEDING BEHAVIORS ARE
OBSERVEDISLIKELYTOCHANGEITSFORAGINGTECHNIQUESORDIETFREQUENTLY TOEATASUR
PRISINGLYLARGERANGEOFFOODSANDTOUSEHANDLINGBEHAVIORSANDNOVELSITUATIONS
INAWAYTHATSTRIKESORNITHOLOGISTSBYITSCOMPLEXITYANDmEXIBILITY4HEYFURTHER
FOUNDTHATBEHAVIORALmEXIBILITYOFBIRDSPECIESINTHEIRNATIVERANGEISRELATEDTO
THEIRSUCCESSASINVADERSWORLDWIDE4HISAPPROACHISAPROMISINGALTERNATIVETO
ESTIMATINGTROPHICNICHEBREADTHFROMFEEDINGRECORDS
2EGARDLESS OF THE PROBLEMS OF ESTIMATION OF TROPHIC SPECIALIZATION TWO ISSUES
DISCUSSED ABOVE IN THE CONTEXT OF GEOGRAPHIC RANGE AND MUTUALISMS ALSO APPLY
HERE &IRST SPECIES SPECIALIZING ON WIDESPREAD RESOURCES PARTICULARLY THOSE THAT
EXPLOIT HUMAN DOMINATED ECOSYSTEMS MAY BE LIKELY TO INVADE IN SPITE OF BEING
SPECIALIZED 3ECOND EVEN IF ACCURATE ESTIMATES USING FEEDING RECORDS PROVIDE
AMEASUREOFTHEREALIZEDNICHEBUTNOTOFTHEFUNDAMENTALNICHE WHICHWOULD
BENECESSARYPREDICTINVASIONSUCCESSINANEWENVIRONMENTWITHADIFFERENTSET
OFFOODRESOURCES

#/.#,5$).'2%-!2+3

-Y REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE SUGGESTS SEVERAL GENERALIZATIONS ABOUT THE ROLE OF
NICHEBREADTHASADETERMINANTOFINVASIONSUCCESS)NPARTICULAR NATIVEHABITAT
GEOGRAPHIC OR CLIMATIC RANGE OF PLANTS AND BIRDS APPEAR TO BE GOOD PREDICTORS
INVASION SUCCESS WHEREAS SPECIlCITY OF MUTUALISTIC INTERACTIONS AND TROPHIC
BREADTH APPEAR TO HAVE A MUCH WEAKER PREDICTIVE POWER (OWEVER EVEN WHEN
RESULTSDOlTTHEPREDICTIONSOFTHENICHEBREADTHnINVASIONSUCCESSHYPOTHESIS IT
ISUSUALLYNOTPOSSIBLETOKNOWWHETHERNICHEBREADTHISINVOLVEDINGENERATING
THE OBSERVED PATTERN &UTURE STUDIES AIMING AT PREDICTING THE SUCCESS OF INVAD
ERS SHOULD TEASE APART THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTIONS OF NICHE BREADTH FROM OTHER
CONFOUNDINGFACTORS-OREBROADLY )HOPEMYREVIEWCANSERVEASANEXAMPLEOF
HOW CONCEPTUAL ELABORATION MAY BE USEFUL TO IMPROVE OUR UNDERSTANDING IN
INVASIONSBIOLOGY
.I CHEBREADTHANDINVASIONSUCCESS 

!#+./7,%$'-%.43

)THANKTHEEDITORSFORTHEINVITATIONTOCONTRIBUTETOTHISVOLUME3EAN-C-AHON
)NGRID0ARKER $AVID2ICHARDSON %RIC3EABLOOM $ANIEL3OLAND-ONTSERRAT6ILÌ
MADE USEFUL SUGGESTIONS ON THE MANUSCRIPT ) WAS SUPPORTED BY A 0OSTDOCTORAL
&ELLOWSHIP AT THE .ATIONAL #ENTER FOR %COLOGICAL !NALYSIS AND 3YNTHESIS
FUNDEDBY.3&'RANT$%"  THE5NIVERSITYOF#ALIFORNIA ANDTHE3ANTA
"ARBARACAMPUS 

2%&%2%.#%3

!RNQVIST 'AND$7OOSTER-ETA ANALYSISSYNTHESIZINGRESEARCHlNDINGSINECOL


OGYANDEVOLUTION4RENDSIN%COLOGYAND%VOLUTION  
"AKER ( '  #HARACTERISTICS AND MODES OF ORIGIN OF WEEDS 0AGES   IN
( ' "AKER AND # , 3TEBBINS EDITORS 4HE 'ENETICS OF #OLONIZING 3PECIES !CADEMIC
0RESS .EW9ORK
"AKER ( '  4HE EVOLUTION OF WEEDS !NNUAL 2EVIEW OF %COLOGY AND 3YSTEMATICS
  
"ASCOMPTE * 0 *ORDANO # * -ELIÉN AND * - /LESEN  4HE NESTED ASSEMBLY OF
PLANT ANIMAL MUTUALISTIC NETWORKS 0ROCEEDINGS OF THE .ATIONAL !CADEMY OF 3CIENCES
53!   
"LACKBURN 4-AND20$UNCAN$ETERMINANTSOFESTABLISHMENTSUCCESSININTRO
DUCEDBIRDS.ATURE  
"ROOKS 4 -  !RE UNSUCCESSFUL AVIAN INVADERS RARER IN THEIR NATIVE RANGE THAN
SUCCESSFUL INVADERS 0AGES   IN * , ,OCKWOOD AND - - -C+INNEY EDITORS
"IOTIC (OMOGENISATION THE LOSS OF DIVERSITY THROUGH INVASION AND EXTINCTION +LUWER
!CADEMIC0RESS $ORDRECHT 4HE.ETHERLANDS
"ROWN * (  /N THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES
!MERICAN.ATURALIST  
#ASSEY 0,IFEHISTORYANDECOLOGYINmUENCESESTABLISHMENTSUCCESSOFINTRODUCED
LANDBIRDS"IOLOGICAL*OURNALOFTHE,INNEAN3OCIETY  
$AEHLER # # AND $ 2 3TRONG  0REDICTION AND BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS 4RENDS IN
%COLOGYAND%VOLUTION  
$UNCAN 2 0 - "OMFORD $ - &ORSYTH AND , #ONIBEAR  (IGH PREDICTABILITY IN
INTRODUCTIONOUTCOMESANDTHEGEOGRAPHICALRANGESIZEOFINTRODUCED!USTRALIANBIRDS
AROLEFORCLIMATE*OURNALOF!NIMAL%COLOGY  
$UPONT 9 , $ - (ANSEN AND * - /LESEN  3TRUCTURE OF A PLANT mOWER VISITOR
NETWORK IN THE HIGH ALTITUDE SUB ALPINE DESERT OF 4ENERIFE #ANARY )SLANDS %COGRAPHY
  
%HRLICH 0 2  7HICH ANIMAL WILL INVADE 0AGES   IN ( ! -OONEY AND
* ! $RAKE EDITORS %COLOGY OF "IOLOGICAL )NVASIONS OF .ORTH !MERICA AND (AWAII
3PRINGER 6ERLAG .EW9ORK
 $06ÉZQUEZ

%RWIN 4,4ROPICALFORESTSTHEIRRICHNESSINCOLEOPTERAANDOTHERARTHROPODSPE
CIES#OLEOPTERISTS"ULLETIN  
'ASTON +*4HE3TRUCTUREAND$YNAMICSOF'EOGRAPHIC2ANGES/XFORD5NIVERSITY
0RESS /XFORDAND.EW9ORK
'ASTON +* 4-"LACKBURNAND*(,AWTON)NTERSPECIlCABUNDANCEnRANGESIZE
RELATIONSHIPSANAPPRAISALOFMECHANISMS*OURNALOF!NIMAL%COLOGY  
'OODWIN "* !*-C!LLISTERAND,&AHRIG0REDICTINGINVASIVENESSOFPLANTSPECIES
BASEDONBIOLOGICALINFORMATION#ONSERVATION"IOLOGY  
'OULSON $  %FFECTS OF INTRODUCED BEES ON NATIVE ECOSYSTEMS !NNUAL 2EVIEW OF
%COLOGY %VOLUTION AND3YSTEMATICS  
'UREVITCH * 0 3 #URTIS AND - ( *ONES  -ETA ANALYSIS IN ECOLOGY !DVANCES IN
%COLOGICAL2ESEARCH  
(ANSKI ) *+OUKIAND!(ALKKA4HREEEXPLANATIONSOFTHEPOSITIVERELATIONSHIP
BETWEENDISTRIBUTIONANDABUNDANCEOFSPECIES0AGES IN2%2ICKLEFSAND$
3CHLUTER EDITORS3PECIESDIVERSITYINECOLOGICALCOMMUNITIESHISTORICALANDGEOGRAPHI
CALPERSPECTIVES5NIVERSITYOF#HICAGO0RESS #HICAGO ),
(ENNEMAN -,AND*-EMMOTT)NlLTRATIONOFA(AWAIIANCOMMUNITYBYINTRO
DUCEDBIOLOGICALCONTROLAGENTS3CIENCE  
(UTCHINSON '%#ONCLUDINGREMARKS#OLD3PRING(ARBOR3YMPOSIAON1UANTITATIVE
"IOLOGY  
*ORDANO 0 *"ASCOMPTEAND*-/LESEN)NVARIANTPROPERTIESINCOEVOLUTIONARY
NETWORKSOFPLANT ANIMALINTERACTIONS%COLOGY,ETTERS  
+ITAYAMA + AND $ -UELLER $OMBOIS  "IOLOGICAL INVASION ON AN OCEANIC ISLAND
MOUNTAIN $O ALIEN PLANT SPECIES HAVE WIDER ECOLOGICAL RANGES THAN NATIVE SPECIES
*OURNALOF6EGETATION3CIENCE  
,OCKWOOD * , - 0 -OULTON AND + , "ALENT  )NTRODUCED AVIFAUNAS AS NATU
RAL EXPERIMENTS IN COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY 0AGES   IN % 7EIHER AND 0 +EDDY
EDITORS %COLOGICAL !SSEMBLY 2ULES 0ERSPECTIVES !DVANCES 2ETREATS #AMBRIDGE
5NIVERSITY0RESS #AMBRIDGE
-ARTINEZ .$ "!(AWKINS (!$AWAHAND"0&EIFAREK%FFECTSOFSAMPLING
EFFORTONCHARACTERIZATIONOFFOOD WEBSTRUCTURE%COLOGY  
-C+INNEY - , AND * , ,OCKWOOD  "IOTIC HOMOGENIZATION A FEW WINNERS
REPLACING MANY LOSERS IN THE NEXT MASS EXTINCTION 4RENDS IN %COLOGY AND %VOLUTION
  
-C,AIN $+ -0-OULTONAND*'3ANDERSON3EXUALSELECTIONANDEXTINCTION
4HE FATE OF PLUMAGE DIMORPHIC AND PLUMAGE MONOMORPHIC BIRDS INTRODUCED ONTO
ISLANDS%VOLUTIONARY%COLOGY2ESEARCH  
-C-ULLEN # +  &LOWER VISITING INSECTS OF THE 'ALÉPAGOS )SLANDS 4HE 0AN 0ACIlC
%NTOMOLOGIST  
-EMMOTT * AND . - 7ASER  )NTEGRATION OF ALIEN PLANTS INTO A NATIVE mOWER
POLLINATOR VISITATION WEB 0ROCEEDINGS OF THE 2OYAL 3OCIETY OF ,ONDON 3ERIES " 
 
.I CHEBREADTHANDINVASIONSUCCESS 

-ORALES #,AND-!!IZEN$OESINVASIONOFEXOTICPLANTSPROMOTEINVASIONOF
EXOTICmOWERVISITORS!CASESTUDYFROMTHETEMPERATEFORESTSOFTHESOUTHERN!NDES
"IOLOGICAL)NVASIONS  
-OULTON - 0 AND 3 , 0IMM  3PECIES INTRODUCTIONS TO (AWAII 0AGES  
IN ( ! -OONEY AND * ! $RAKE EDITORS %COLOGY OF "IOLOGICAL )NVASIONS OF .ORTH
!MERICAAND(AWAII3PRINGER 6ERLAG .EW9ORK
.OVOTNâ 6 9"ASSET 3%-ILLER '$7EIBLEN ""REMER ,#IZEKAND0$ROZD
,OWHOSTSPECIlCITYOFHERBIVOROUSINSECTSINATROPICALFOREST.ATURE  
ŒDEGAARD &(OWMANYSPECIESOFARTHROPODS%RWINSESTIMATEREVISED"IOLOGICAL
*OURNALOFTHE,INNEAN3OCIETY  
/LESEN *- ,)%SKILDSENAND36ENKATASAMY)NVASIONOFPOLLINATIONNETWORKS
ON OCEANIC ISLANDS IMPORTANCE OF INVADER COMPLEXES AND ENDEMIC SUPER GENERALISTS
$IVERSITYAND$ISTRIBUTIONS  
0EARSON $%AND2-#ALLAWAY)NDIRECTEFFECTSOFHOST SPECIlCBIOLOGICALCONTROL
AGENTS4RENDSIN%COLOGY%VOLUTION  
0RINZING ! 7 $URKA 3 +LOTZ AND 2 "RANDL  7HICH SPECIES BECOME ALIENS
%VOLUTIONARY%COLOGY2ESEARCH  
2EJMÉNEK -7HATMAKESASPECIESINVASIVE0AGES IN00YÝEK EDITOR0LANT
INVASIONSGENERALASPECTSANDSPECIALPROBLEMS!CADEMIC0UBLISHING !MESTERDAM
2EJMÉNEK -  )NVASIVE PLANTS APPROACHES AND PREDICTIONS !USTRAL %COLOGY 
 
2ICCIARDI ! AND * " 2ASMUSSEN  0REDICTING THE IDENTITY AND IMPACT OF FUTURE
BIOLOGICAL INVADERS A PRIORITY FOR AQUATIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT #ANADIAN *OURNAL OF
&ISHERIESAND!QUATIC3CIENCES  
2ICHARDSON $- .!LLSOPP #-$!NTONIO 3*-ILTONAND-2EJMÉNEK0LANT
INVASIONSˆTHEROLEOFMUTUALISMS"IOLOGICAL2EVIEWS  
2OY * - , .AVAS AND , 3ONIÏ  )NVASION BY ANNUAL GRASSES A CASE STUDY
CHALLENGINGTHEHOMOCLIMEAPPROACHTOINVASIONS0AGES IN2('ROVESAND
& DI #ASTRI EDITORS "IOGEOGRAPHY OF -EDITERRANEAN )NVASIONS #AMBRIDGE 5NIVERSITY
0RESS #AMBRIDGE
3COTT * + AND & $ 0ANETTA  0REDICTING THE !USTRALIAN WEED STATUS OF SOUTHERN
!FRICANPLANTS*OURNALOF"IOGEOGRAPHY  
3IMBERLOFF $ AND 0$ 3TILING  (OW RISKY IN BIOLOGICAL CONTROL %COLOGY

 
3OL $ AND , ,EFEBVRE  "EHAVIOURAL mEXIBILITY PREDICTS INVASION SUCCESS IN BIRDS
INTRODUCEDTO.EW:EALAND/IKOS  
3OL $ 34IMMERMANSAND,,EFEBVRE"EHAVIOURALmEXIBILITYANDINVASIONSUCCESS
INBIRDS!NIMAL"EHAVIOUR  
VAN+LINKEN 2$AND/2%DWARDS)SHOST SPECIlCITYOFWEEDBIOLOGICALCONTROL
AGENTSLIKELYTOEVOLVERAPIDLYFOLLOWINGESTABLISHMENT%COLOGY,ETTERS  
6ÉZQUEZ $ 0 AND - ! !IZEN  .ULL MODEL ANALYSES OF SPECIALIZATION IN PLANT
POLLINATORINTERACTIONS%COLOGY  
6ÉZQUEZ $0AND-!!IZENA!SYMMETRICSPECIALIZATIONAPERVASIVEFEATUREOF
PLANT POLLINATORINTERACTIONS%COLOGY  

You might also like