You are on page 1of 67

Middle Magdalena Basin

Basin Summary Report

Bally Snelson Class: Foredeep/grabens


Kingston Class:
Klemme Class: Intracont complex

Young Age: Holocene


Old Age: Triassic

Number of Fields Recoverable Reserves


115

Oil Recoverable PP MMbbl


3896.12
Gas Recoverable PP MMscf
4218291.14
Condensate Recoverable PP MMbbl
2.94

Total Recoverable PP MMboe


4602.11

EDIN | Summary Report


IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin

Contents

General Basin Data 2


Map Coverage 3
Map Location 4
Geological Overview 5
Exploration Overview 7
Development Overview 11
Field Reserves and Production 14
Geothermal Gradients 15
Genetic Unit(s) 15
Play(s) 15
Play Reservoirs(s) 16
Petroleum System(s) 17
Source Rock(s) 18
Reservoirs(s) 20
Seal(s) 22
Structure (remarks) 23
Generation - Migration (remarks) 26
Exploration Possibility (remarks) 27
Data Availability (remarks) 29
Images 40
Bibliography 55
Image References 64

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

General Basin Data

Geography Colombia

Basin Onshore Sqkm 30,855.7

Bally Snelson Class Foredeep/grabens

Klemme Class Intracont complex

Basin Young Age Holocene

Basin Old Age Triassic

Gross Thickn Max Val Meter 12,000

Pet System Names La Luna - Chuspas/Chorro

Play Names Cretaceous Structural~Tertiary Compressional Structural~Tertiary Extensional Structural~Tertiary


Extensional Stratigraphic-Structural~Tertiary Extensional Structural-Unconformity~Tertiary
Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural-Unconformity~Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-
Structural~Tertiary Compressional Structural-Unconformity~La Luna Continuous-type~Umir Continuous-
type~Simiti Continuous-type~Cretaceous ~Tertiary Compressional ~Tertiary Extensional

Unique Basin Id 109600

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Basin Location and Limits


The Middle Magdalena Basin is located onshore Colombia between the Central and Eastern Cordilleras. The basin extends
in a north-south trend for more than 500 km with an average width of 60 km.

The basin is markedly asymmetric, thickening towards the Eastern Cordillera and Santander Massif. The thickness of the
basin sequence ranges from 0 to 3,000 m along the western margin of the basin to more than 12,000 m along the eastern
margin.

The eastern margin of the basin is marked by the La Salinas and Dos Hermanos thrusts, which bound the Eastern
Cordillera. The western margin established where Tertiary sedimentary fill onlaps pre-Cretaceous sequences. The
northeastern boundary of the basin is formed by thrusts along the margin of the Santander Massif. The Bituima Thrust
marks the southern margin at the town of Guataqui, separating it from the Upper Magdalena Basin. To the north, the Middle
Magdalena Basin is separated from the Lower Magdalena Basin by the Murrucucu Fault.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 2 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Map Coverage

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 3 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Map Location

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 4 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Geological Overview

Location
The Middle Magdalena Basin of Colombia is located entirely onshore and lies between the Central and Eastern Cordilleras.
The basin is strongly elongate, parallel to the Andean mountain belt. The basin is asymmetrical with the main depocentre in
the east. The sedimentary succession thins to the west where locally it onlaps the Central Cordillera.

Basin Evolution
The basin developed as part of a chain of sub-Andean foreland basins, separated from the main foreland basin to the east
by the growth of the Eastern Cordillera during the Tertiary.

It is a polycyclic basin and had an early history as part of a Triassic-Lower Cretaceous rift basin on the northwest edge of the
South American continent.

Early Andean deformation began in the Late Cretaceous with collision of the Pinon (Amaime) Terrane to the west and uplift
of part of the Central Cordillera, which supplied clastic sediments from the west. During the Late Paleocene-Early Oligocene,
uplift and structural development of parts of the Eastern Cordillera took place to the east of the Middle Magdalena Basin.
This tectonism was associated with lithospheric flexure and the development of an Eocene-Oligocene foreland basin, whose
depocentre was on the eastern side of the basin and whose principal sediment supply was from the east.

In the Early Miocene, the main phase of Andean polyphase deformation began with further tectonic activity and uplift of the
Eastern Cordillera. Andean tectonism continues at the present time.

Source Rocks
The La Luna Formation shales and limestones are the main known oil and gas source rocks. Shales and coals of the Umir
Formation are also proven source rocks, but of secondary importance. Geochemical studies have shown that limestones
and shales of the Rosablanca Formation are oil-prone (Type I/II kerogen), thus having a good generation potential. Shales
of the Cumbre and Simiti formations are also considered potential source rocks, and well as mudstones and limestones of
the Tablazo Formation.

Source rocks are thermally mature throughout most of the eastern part of the basin. Oil generation may have begun during
the Early Tertiary in the deep Cretaceous Bogota Basin, within the Eastern Cordillera, prior to uplift. However, Cretaceous
source rocks are presently mature beneath many of the synclines in the eastern part of the basin and oil may still be
generated at the present time. Therefore, there were several phases of oil generation.

Reservoirs
Upper Eocene-Lower Miocene fluvial sandstones and conglomerates of the Chuspas and Chorros groups are the principal
reservoirs in the basin. Porosities are variable, depending on the level of induration. Permeabilities also vary considerably
due to variable cement and clay content and to variations in sorting. Additional minor reservoirs are found throughout the
post-rift stratigraphic section. The Lower Cretaceous limestones of the Rosablanca and Tablazo formations are good
reservoirs when fractured as well as the Upper Cretaceous bituminous limestones of the La Luna Formation. Minor
reservoirs are also found in distributary channel deposits of the Paleocene terrestrial-transitional Lisama Formation and in
Miocene fluvial and alluvial sandstones of the Real Group. The organic-rich shales of the Simiti, La Luna, and Umir
formation are considered potential unconventional hydrocarbon reservoirs.

Seals

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 5 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Seals for the principal reservoirs of the Chorro and Chuspas groups are intraformational shales deposited in floodplain and
overbank environments.

The Simiti and Paja formations’ marine shales form regional seals for underlying limestone reservoirs, and intraformational
marine shales seal reservoirs in the La Luna and Lisama formations. Intraformational fluvial shales seal the Real Group
reservoirs.

Structures
Upper Cretaceous crustal thickening in the Central Cordillera led to flexural subsidence and the growth of the Tertiary
foreland basin. This basin was first partially destroyed and uplifted by Lower Tertiary eastward-verging thrusts and then by
Upper Tertiary west-verging thrusts. The thrusts are stepped with ramp-flat geometry; flat detachments occur in the Upper
Cretaceous shales. The dominant structures are large hanging-wall fault-bend folds, cored by basement and their
associated underthrust structures. The west-verging backthrusts developed from ramps on the hanging-walls of east-verging
forethrusts. The west-verging thrusts along the eastern side of the basin branch from east-verging thrusts beneath the
Eastern Cordillera. Wrench faulting with large flower structures was formed during the Neogene.

Plays
There are three established groups of plays, Cretaceous, Tertiary Compressional and Tertiary Extensional in the Middle
Magdalena Basin. The Tertiary Compressional plays involve traps associated with compressional deformations; Tertiary
Extensional plays involve traps associated with extensional ones, with wrench movement component fault blocks. The
Tertiary Compressional group of plays is the largest and most important play in the basin. Reservoirs are mainly
sandstones, although there are some carbonate reservoirs present within Cretaceous Structural Play. The La Luna, Simiti
and Umir Shale Oil & Gas plays are considered prospective in the Middle Magdalena Basin. Even though the La Luna one
could be most prolific in the basin (e.g., Juliao et al., 2012; Torres et al., 2015), the Tablazo and Rosablanca shales are also
attractive targets for unconventional reservoirs (Aguja et al., 2010; Willis & Ganguly, 2014; Cespedes et al., 2015; Jimenez
et al., 2015).

Petroleum Systems
There is one known petroleum system in the basin, the La Luna/Umir - Chuspas/Chorro Petroleum System. It contains
Cretaceous source beds and Tertiary and Cretaceous reservoirs, although the Tertiary reservoirs are the only major ones.
Oil is still being generated from the La Luna source rock at the present time.

A hypothetical petroleum system known as the Basal Limestone - Basal Limestone system has been proposed as a new
exploration frontier. It includes both reservoirs and potential source rocks within the Lower Cretaceous sequence.

Exploration Potential
Future exploration potential exists in the lesser explored parts of the basin, particularly in the south. Exploration potential
also exists in sub-thrust structures in the east and in wrenching structures in the west. Potential is seen in understanding the
deeper structures, the stratigraphic variations for potential sub-thrust, stratigraphic plays and the Lower Cretaceous play.

The Middle Magdalena ranking second in oil volumes among Colombian basins (Bedregal et al., 2020). Recently
established substantial unconventional hydrocarbons potential in this basin, which amounts to 4.8 Bbl of oil in-place and 18
Tcf of gas in-place, is within Cretaceous shales (Cespedes et al., 2015, and reference therein).

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 6 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Exploration Overview

Exploration Introduction
The first discovery in the Middle Magdalena Basin was made in 1918 at the Infantas field. Since then, more than 500 new
field wildcats (NFWs) have been drilled and over 31,000 line-km of 2D and 5,300 sq km of 3D seismic have been shot. As a
result, further 103 discoveries have been made, with discovered reserves amounting to more than 3,300 MMbbl and 4,040
Bscfg (October 2016).

The new field wildcat density in the basin is 61 sq km/NFW and seismic density is about 1.2 sq km/line- km. This makes the
Middle Magdalena Basin a very mature province in terms of exploration. Although the average field size has decreased over
the years, continued discoveries mean that the interest in the area has been maintained.

NFW success ratio for the basin has an average of 20% for all-time, and grows to 26% in the last 10 years.

The approximate remaining recoverable (proven and probable) reserves of the basin are 776 MMbo and 729 Bscfg (as of
October 2016), which categorize the basin as highly prospective.

Exploration History
1) PETROLEUM RIGHTS AND EXPLORATION LICENSING HISTORY

Petroleum exploration and production activities are governed by Law No. 20 of 1969 and Decree No. 2310 of 1974, as
amended by Decree No. 2782 of 1989 and Decree No. 1093 of 1990. The 1969 law provided for certain areas to be
reserved by the government for the national oil company, Empresa Colombiana de Petroleos (Ecopetrol), to carry out
exploration and production activities either on its own account or jointly with private oil companies under association
contracts. Until then, petroleum rights had been awarded under a concession system governed by Decree No. 1056 of 1953.
From 1974, concessions were no longer awarded to oil companies and Ecopetrol was vested with exclusive rights in respect
of all open areas. Ecopetrol developed a form of agreement, the "association contract", which was used as a basis for
carrying out exploration and production in association with foreign oil companies. Since the 1970s, Ecopetrol has modified
the association contract on a number of occasions to attract foreign investment. Its basic structure, however, remains
unchanged.

Colombian government maintains its positive foreign oil and gas investment policy attracting the market’s attention and
investment. While some of the South American countries are announcing policies that were not so welcoming, Colombia’s
policies seemed to be working in the 2010s.

The inauguration of the right-wing Ivan Duque government in August 2018 has enabled
continuity in Colombia’s investor-friendly hydrocarbon policies. The Duque
administration is seeking to better exploit remaining onshore hydrocarbon potential by
awarding new exploration blocks and promoting IOR/EOR projects.

In the wake of the March 2020 oil price collapse, the government’s near-term policy
priority will be to maintain investment levels on existing projects. The ANH has
approved important measures to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
These include allowing investment transfers between contracts; allowing extensions for
various project phases; granting greater flexibility regarding guaranty/insurance for
work programs; and enabling payment deferrals.

In July 2020, ANH approved a set of regulations to carry out pilot projects in
unconventional deposits. These regulations contain the areas where projects may be
carried out and the awarding criteria. The regulations also contain provisions regarding

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 7 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

community economic participation—an effort aimed at mitigating the risk of social


conflict with local actors. Going forward, the government is expected to continue efforts
to facilitate unconventional investment through targeted fiscal incentives.

The pace of unconventional hydrocarbon exploration nonetheless will likely remain


slow owing to persistent local opposition and stricter environmental scrutiny of E&P
activity in general. Aboveground risks such as insurgent-led pipeline attacks, local
community blockades, delays in environmental permitting, and legal uncertainties
owing to unfavorable judicial decisions are expected to continue to deter new entrants (Bedregal et al., 2020).

The first awards in the basin were made at the beginning of the century to Senor de Mares and were operated by Tropical
Oil Company. From the 1920s, majors such as Mobil and Shell became active and more recent operators include smaller
Colombian and foreign independents. The state company Ecopetrol, however, is the largest acreage holder.

1980s: The only exploration/production contract covering 2,843 sq km over De Mare Block was awarded to Ecopetrol in
1989.

1990s: Petrosantander and Lagosur Petroleum were awarded with the El Pinar and Bolivar blocks for
exploration/production, covering 49 sq km and 82 sq km in 1990 and 1996, respectively.

2000s: 12 operators were awarded with 14 exploration/production and surface exploration/drilling licenses over 14 blocks
covering 5,280 sq km.

2010s: 14 blocks covering 8,381 sq km were awarded to nine operators for exploration & production purposes in 2010-2014.

2) EXPLORATION SURVEY HISTORY

1950s-1960s: No information is available about the total kilometres of seismic shot during this time, but in these two
decades there were 66 2D seismic and 14 gravity/magnetic surveys shot in a total of at least 412 party-months. Based on
the average kilometres/month for the succeeding decades, it is estimated that the total kilometres was between 21,000 and
30,000 for the 20 year period. If the estimate is correct, this is most seismic that has ever been shot in this basin. Cities
Service and Sinclair were the operators for most of the surveys during this time. 12 of the surveys run during the 1960s were
gravity/magnetic surveys, and most of these were operated by Ecopetrol.

1970s: 57 surveys were shot for a total of 2,721 line-km (incomplete data). Only one was a gravity survey, with the
remainder being 2D surveys. 11 operators ran these surveys with Ecopetrol being the operator for the largest number of
surveys (15) as well as the largest total line-kilometres (1,983).

1980s: During this decade, 73 2D and two 3D seismic surveys were run for a total of 8,734 line-km (incomplete data) and
108 sq km, respectively. Also, four gravity/magnetic surveys were carried out. By this time, 26 different operators were
involved. Again, Ecopetrol operated the most surveys (14) and ran the most line-kilometres (3,939). Petrobras ran the
largest single survey during this time period with a 515 km survey over their Sogamosa contract. This survey was also the
only survey the Petrobras operated in the Middle Magdalena Basin. The first reported 3D survey was run by Shell in 1985.

1990s: Exploration survey activity was about the same during the 1990s, with 67 2D, eight 3D and eight gravity/magnetic
surveys covering 6,458 line-km and 654 sq km in total. The total number of companies operating these surveys declined to
16 from 26 during the previous decade. Ecopetrol ran the largest number of surveys (31) as well as total line-kilometres
(2,751) and square kilometres (386).

2000s: The number of surveys slightly dropped to 76, including 48 2D, two 2D+3D, 23 3D and three gravity/magnetic
surveys, which were carried out by 33 operators (20 surveys by Ecopetrol). Seismic surveys acquired 4,556 line-km of 2D
and 1,831 sq km of 3D data (incomplete data), respectively.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 8 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

2010s: As of to date (October 2016), 18 operators completed 35 seismic surveys, including 13 2D and 22 3D surveys,
acquiring 2,352 line-km and 2,935 sq km of seismic data.

3) EXPLORATION DRILLING HISTORY

1900-1949: The first drilling activity in the basin took place at the beginning of the century, spurred by the reports of oil
seeps at Barrancabermeja. The first discovery was made in 1918 at the Infantas field by the Tropical Oil Company. The
Infantas field had 326 MMboe recoverable reserves and is still the fourth largest field to have been found in the basin. Over
the next three decades (1920s, 30s and 40s), 98 wildcats were drilled and completed, resulting in 11 economic discoveries.
Most of the wells were shallow (~1,500 m), although a few were as deep as 2,500-3,000m. The largest field, and the only
giant field in the basin (La Cira with 748 MMboe recoverable), was discovered in 1926. Three other large (>100 MMboe)
were also discovered during this time period but not until the 1940s, when there was more exploration drilling activity than
the previous three decades combined. Most of the discoveries in this period were in Oligocene reservoirs, either the
Mugrosa or the Colorado formations. Two of the discoveries were in the underlying Eocene formations (La Paz and
Esmeraldas).

1950s: Exploratory activity stepped up again during the 1950s, when 81 NFWs were drilled and completed by 10 operators.
21 discoveries were made during this decade, although only nine resulted in any significant production. Only one large
discovery was made, the Palagua field. The significant development of this decade was a discovery in Cretaceous rocks,
proving up reserves in the Cretaceous Structural Play. The Olivo (Buturama) field produces from the Rosa Blanca Formation
and holds about 6 MMboe of reserves. Additional discoveries have since been made in the Rosa Blanca and other Basal
Limestone Group formations, but this field is the only one that has ever produced.

1960s: About the same number (80) of NFWs was drilled and completed by 10 operators during the sixties as in the
previous decade; the success rate was less, with 16 discoveries made. Of these, eleven were productive. However among
the successes, there were three large fields. The largest of these, Provincia, was drilled by the Texas Petroleum Co. and is
the third largest field in the basin, with 392 MMboe. Another significant aspect of this field is that it was the first field with
proven reserves in the Paleocene Lisama Formation. The Opon field, with 35 MMboe, is significant for being the first
gas/condensate field. It is still one of only four gas or gas/condensate fields in the basin.

1970s: Exploration activity declined significantly in the Middle Magdalena Basin during the 1970s. Only 35 NFWs wells were
drilled and completed by nine operators. Nine discoveries were made, and only three of these were commercial, though they
were small (1-10 MMboe) and very small (<1 MMboe).

1980s: 96 NFWs were drilled and completed during the 1980s by 27 operators, resulting in 21 discoveries. Only 12 of these
were developed. This is a higher success rate than from the previous decade. Additionally, among the discoveries were four
medium sized fields. The deepest well in the basin was drilled in 1982. The Lilia 2 well was drilled to a total depth of 4,778 m
by Webb de Colombia, however its Mugrosa Formation target was dry.

1990s: Exploration activity during the 1990s declined again back to the level of the 1970s. Only 37 NFWs were drilled and
completed by 10 operators. Five discoveries were made, and only one small field has been developed.

2000s: Number of drilled and completed NFWs increased to 59 by 22 operators, and 13 very small to small discoveries have
been made.

2010s: As of to date (October 2016), 40 NFWS were drilled and completed by 20 operators resulting in 12 discoveries. Only
one of them is of medium size (Mono Arena field), while all other are small (9) and very small (2).

Exploration Environment
The Middle Magdalena Basin is situated in the valley of the Magdalena River between the Eastern and Central Cordilleras.
The river's drainage area is fed by numerous torrential rivers from the adjacent mountains thus having a large hydroelectric

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 9 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

power potential. The Magdalena River is generally navigable from the Caribbean Sea as far as the town of Neiva, at the
southern end of the basin, but is interrupted midway by rapids. The river has cut deep into the valley floor such that the
elevation is only about 300 m above sea level, whereas the adjacent mountains reach elevations of 2,700 m. The valley floor
is flat and low lying and becomes marshy, with numerous lakes, close to the river.

The climate is moderate to hot, with temperatures ranging between 24 and 38 deg C. There are alternating dry and wet
seasons corresponding to summer and winter. In the higher elevations, temperature varies between 19 and 24 deg C, and
there are two wet and two dry seasons each year; January through March and July through September. Annual rainfall
averages about 1,300 mm.

Although guerrilla activity may be prohibitive, successes continue to be made in the basin. Pay depths are moderate, but
problems with waterlogged and marshy ground close to the river are likely to impact on exploration costs.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 10 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Development Overview
Introduction
The Middle Magdalena Basin is now at a very mature stage, with about 77% of the known liquid reserves and 82% of the
gas reserves have been exploited, and both oil and gas productions are on decline with except for the last decade (October
2016).

A total of 5,784 development wells have been drilled in the basin from 1908 to date (October 2016).

From the total number of 104 fields discovered in the Middle Magdalena Basin, a total of 2,515 wells were actively producing
from 53 oil and two gas fields.

The Middle Magdalena Basin has had a long history of production, and a widespread pipeline network has been developed
to serve producing fields in this and adjacent basins. However, as depletion progresses at some of the larger fields in the
basin, it has become necessary to introduce improved recovery methods in an attempt to maintain production levels. Infill
drilling and opening up of previously by-passed reservoir intervals has helped in some fields. Well spacing in the older fields
is down to 15 acres (approximately 1 well/60,000 sq m).

Development and Production History


1) DEVELOPMENT/PRODUCTION LICENSING HISTORY

1980s: InterOil Colombia was awarded with development/production license over the Puli-Toqui-Toqui Block covering 61 sq
km in 1984.

1990s: Seven production licenses covering 3,066 sq km were granted to Ecopetrol (6) and Mansarovar Energy (1).

2000s: Ecopetrol received six development/production licenses covering 351 sq km.

2) DEVELOPMENT DRILLING HISTORY

1900-1910s: The first two development wells were drilled and completed for oil at the La Cira field by Standard Oil in 1908
and 1911.

1920s: Three operators drilled 461 development wells (70% by Tropical Oil) at the Infantas, La Cira and San Luis fields, and
459 of them were completed for oil.

1930s: The number of development wells increased to 573 at the same three fields by five operators, and 570 of them were
completed for oil. Standard Oil drilled 76% of the total number. More than 76% of all wells were drilled at the La Cira field.

1940s: The number of wells drilled by six operators has dropped to 394 at six fields. Most wells were drilled by Standard Oil
and Ecopetrol (352 wells) at the La Cira (219) and Casabe (133) fields.

1950s: Development drilling activity increased almost twice compared to 1940s, with 739 development wells being drilled by
13 operators (94% by Shell Condor, Texaco, Ecopetrol, Standard Oil and Tropical Oil) at 13 fields. Development and infill
drilling continued on fields that had been discovered in earlier decades (e.g., Casabe), although good portion of the
development drilling switched to new discoveries, particularly the larger ones such as Palagua (99 wells).

1960s: Nine operators drilled 324 and completed 310 wells (77% by Ecopetrol and Texaco), which was a lowest number in
basin’s development history.

1970s: The number of development wells has further decreased to 258 (234 completed) by nine operators at 15 fields.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 11 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

1980s: Development activity increased markedly during the 1980s with 1,088 development wells being drilled and 898
completed for oil by nine operators (76% by Texaco and Ecopetrol) at 22 fields. Texaco drilled 37% of all development wells
at the Cocorna-Teca-Nare Sur field.

1990s: The number of wells drilled by eight operators has abruptly decreased to 222 at seven fields. Most wells (about 70%)
were drilled by Texaco at the Cocorna-Teca-Nare Sur field. Besides, 20 wells there were drilled by Omimex de Colombia.

2000s: The number of wells drilled by 12 operators skyrocketed to 1,258 at 32 fields. Most of them were drilled and
completed by Ecopetrol (497 wells) and Mansarovar Energy (350 wells) mainly at the La Cira (221 wells) and Nare-Nare
Norte (239 wells) fields.

2010s: As of to date (October 2016), 463 development wells were drilled and 451 were completed by eight operators at 16
fields from 2010 to 2015. Mansarovar Energy drilled 346 wells, mainly at the Moriche field (239 wells).

3) PRODUCTION HISTORY

Development activity commenced shortly after the first discovery at the Infantas, but there is a little information available
regarding early activity. No production data are available from 1994 to mid-1997.

1900s-1940s: The first liquids production from the Middle Magdalena Basin started in 1922, when the Infantas field was
brought onstream. This was followed by the La Cira giant field in 1926. Medium to large discoveries made in the early 1940s
were swiftly developed and, by 1950, seven fields were or had been producing. Reliable annual production data began to be
available after 1947.

1950s: Seven operators produced 306 MMbo and 315 Bscfg from 20 fields, of which 292 MMbo and 252 Bscfg were
produced by Ecopetrol. The Casabe and La Cira fields provided more than 67% of total oil and 88% of total gas production.

1960s: Ten operators increased oil production to 431 MMbbl and gas production to 492 Bscf from 32 fields. Ecopetrol
produced 64% of oil and 68% of gas in the basin. Throughout the 1950s and early 1960s, production rates in many of the
older fields decreased, but with other discoveries being brought onstream, the overall total production continued to increase.
Production for the basin peaked in 1965 at 137 Mb/d.

1970s: Basin gas production continued to increase to 643 Bscfg, while oil production dropped to 311 MMbo by nine
operators from 31 fields. Ecopetrol produced 73% of oil and 57% of gas in the basin. The La Cira and Provincia fields
provided about 92% of total oil production, and the Payoa and Provincia fields gave 76% of total gas production.

1980s: Both oil and gas productions slightly dropped to 296 MMbo and 618 Bscfg produced by 12 operators from 42 fields.
Ecopetrol produced 81% of oil and 67% of gas in the basin. The Provincia and Cocorna-Teca-Nare Sur fields provided about
28% of total oil production, and the Provincia field gave 46% of total gas production.
By 1980, production rates had dropped to less than 70 Mb/d. As a result, the 1980s saw a rise in development activity,
mostly around Salina-Aguas Claras, Casabe, Lisama, Provincia and Cocorna-Teca-Nare Sur fields. Several fields began
improved recovery programs, and production saw another smaller peak in 1986 at 93 Mb/d.

1990s: Hydrocarbon production decreased again to 247 MMbo and 422 Bscfg by 11 operators despite number of producing
fields grew to 47. As usual, most reserves were produced by Ecopetrol: 80% of oil and 62% of gas.
The Provincia and Cocorna-Teca-Nare Sur fields provided about 28% of total oil production, and the Payoa and Provincia
fields gave 71% of total gas production.

2000s: Oil and gas productions reached their minimum with 232 MMbo and 258 Bscfg produced from 62 fields by 16
operators. About 47% of total gas production came from the Payoa and Provincia fields, and 53% of oil production was from
the Cantagallo-Yarigui, Casabe, La Cira and Nare-Nare fields. Ecopetrol still extracted most of the oil (65%) and gas (52%).

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 12 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

2010s: As of to date (October 2016), 310 MMbbl of oil and 180 Bscf of gas were produced from the record number of fields
(62) by 16 operators, which may be considered as an encouraging result, especially for oil. Ecopetrol still produced most of
the oil (63%) and gas (54%). The La Cira and Casabe fields provided 33% of total oil production, and the Provincia field
provided 21% of total gas production.

Many of the accumulations in the basin contain a moderate to heavy crude. Water and gas injection has been carried out in
several fields. In addition, a cyclic steam injection program and a polymer solution water injection scheme have been
attempted in certain fields but with mixed success. For example, several different water injection schemes have been tried at
La Cira field, but it is believed that much of the increased production observed during the projects could be attributed to
other infill drilling and workovers being performed at the same time.

Development Environment
The basin is well developed as regards oil pipelines. Several pipelines run roughly north-south along the length of the basin,
serving not only the fields in the Middle Magdalena, but also those of the Upper Magdalena Basin to the south. In addition,
the northern end of the basin is transacted by lines linking the northern Llanos Basin’ fields to the coast at Covenas and
Santa Marta, with a second line crossing the southern part of the basin and linking the southern Llanos Basin’ fields with
Covenas. A gas pipeline runs from Barrancabermeja to Aguachica and continues to the north. With the planned increase in
gas utilization within the country, Ecopetrol is in the process of building up the gas pipeline network into a basic national grid.
The Ecopetrol-operated Barrancabermeja refinery is situated in the center of the basin. It has a capacity of 173,000 b/d.
Another one, Cimitarra, is located at Magdalena Valley. Gas processing plants are situated at Barrancabermeja, La Cira and
Provincia. In addition, there are ammonia and olefin plants at Barrancabermeja.

The area has a long history of activity and availability of service industry. Physical and climatic conditions are favorable, and
drill-depths are moderate. Economically, negative factors include guerrilla activity and small size of recent discoveries. The
fiscal regime in Colombia is based on production sharing with Ecopetrol and includes royalty and income tax.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 13 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Field Reserves and Production

Number of Fields 115

Oil Recoverable PP MMbbl 3,896.12

Gas Recoverable PP MMscf 4,218,291.14

Cond Recoverable PP MMbbl 2.94

Total Recoverable PP MMboe 4,602.11

Cumul Oil Prod MMbbl 2,794.14

Cumul Gas Prod MMscf 3,491,023.59

Cumul Cond Prod MMbbl 1.38

Cumul Tot Prod MMboe 3,377.35

Oil Remaining PP MMbbl 1,101.98

Gas Remaining PP MMscf 727,267.55

Cond Remaining PP MMbbl 1.56

Total Remaining PP MMboe 1,224.74

Daily Oil bbl 128,589.28

Daily Gas MMscf 69.97

Daily Condensate bbl 12.39

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 14 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Geothermal Gradients

Geotherm Min Val Deg C Per Km Geotherm Max Val Deg C Per Km Geotherm Avg Val Deg C Per Km

16

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Genetic Unit(s)

Genetic Unit Name Chronostratigraphy Gu Id Rank Ind

Basement Upper Proterozoic-Artinskian 100000000497 0

Syn-rift Unit Griesbachian-Oxfordian 100000000498 1

Post-rift Unit Tithonian-Thanetian 100000000499 2

Early Foreland Unit Priabonian-Burdigalian 100000000500 3

Late Foreland Unit Serravallian-Versilian 100000000501 4

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Play(s)

Play Name Reservoir Lithostrat Units Oil Eq Reserves Per Play MMBoe

Cretaceous

La Luna Shale Continuous-type La Luna Formation

Simiti Shale Continuous-type Simiti Shale Formation

Tertiary Compressional

Tertiary Extensional

Umir Shale Continuous-type Umir Formation

Tertiary Compressional Structural Lisama Formation~Mugrosa Formation~Colorado 2,368


Formation~La Paz Formation~Esmeraldas
Formation~Real Group

Tertiary Extensional Structural Chuspas Group~Chorro Group 920

Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural Mugrosa Formation~Esmeraldas 903


Formation~Colorado Formation~La Paz
Formation~Lisama Formation~Real Group

Tertiary Compressional Structural-Unconformity La Paz Formation~Colorado Formation~Lisama 254


Formation

Cretaceous Structural Basal Limestone Group~Tablazo Limestone 147


Formation~Umir Formation~Rosablanca
Formation~La Luna Formation

Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural- Colorado Formation 9


Unconformity

Tertiary Extensional Structural-Unconformity Lisama Formation 2

Tertiary Extensional Stratigraphic-Structural Lisama Formation~Colorado Formation 1

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 15 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Play Reservoirs(s)

Play Name Lithostrat Unit Chronostratigraphy

Cretaceous Structural Basal Limestone Group Hauterivian-Lower Albian

Cretaceous Structural Tablazo Limestone Formation Upper Aptian-Lower Albian

Cretaceous Structural Umir Formation Campanian-Maastrichtian

Cretaceous Structural Rosablanca Formation Valanginian-Hauterivian

Cretaceous Structural La Luna Formation Turonian-Lower Campanian

La Luna Shale Continuous-type La Luna Formation Turonian-Lower Campanian

Simiti Shale Continuous-type Simiti Shale Formation Middle Albian-Upper Albian

Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural La Paz Formation Lower Priabonian-Middle Priabonian

Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural Real Group Serravallian-Messinian

Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural Lisama Formation Danian-Thanetian

Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural Colorado Formation Aquitanian-Burdigalian

Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural Esmeraldas Formation Middle Priabonian-Upper Priabonian

Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural Mugrosa Formation Rupelian-Chattian

Tertiary Compressional Stratigraphic-Structural- Colorado Formation Aquitanian-Burdigalian


Unconformity

Tertiary Compressional Structural Lisama Formation Danian-Thanetian

Tertiary Compressional Structural Colorado Formation Aquitanian-Burdigalian

Tertiary Compressional Structural Mugrosa Formation Rupelian-Chattian

Tertiary Compressional Structural La Paz Formation Lower Priabonian-Middle Priabonian

Tertiary Compressional Structural Esmeraldas Formation Middle Priabonian-Upper Priabonian

Tertiary Compressional Structural Real Group Serravallian-Messinian

Tertiary Compressional Structural-Unconformity La Paz Formation Lower Priabonian-Middle Priabonian

Tertiary Compressional Structural-Unconformity Colorado Formation Aquitanian-Burdigalian

Tertiary Compressional Structural-Unconformity Lisama Formation Danian-Thanetian

Tertiary Extensional Stratigraphic-Structural Lisama Formation Danian-Thanetian

Tertiary Extensional Stratigraphic-Structural Colorado Formation Aquitanian-Burdigalian

Tertiary Extensional Structural Chuspas Group Rupelian-Burdigalian

Tertiary Extensional Structural Chorro Group Priabonian-Priabonian

Tertiary Extensional Structural-Unconformity Lisama Formation Danian-Thanetian

Umir Shale Continuous-type Umir Formation Middle Campanian-Maastrichtian

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 16 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Petroleum System(s)

Pet System Name Chronostratigraphy Certainty Level

La Luna - Chuspas/Chorro Valanginian-Eocene Known

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 17 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Source Rock(s)

Lithostrat Unit Country Name Lithologies Chronostratigraphy

Galembo Member Colombia shale Middle Coniacian-Lower Campanian

La Luna Formation Colombia shale Turonian-Lower Campanian

Pujamana Member Colombia shale Upper Turonian-Lower Coniacian

Salada Member Colombia shale Lower Turonian-Lower Turonian

Umir Formation Colombia coaly shale Middle Campanian-Maastrichtian

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Source Rocks Maturation (remarks)


Proven source rocks in the Middle Magdalena Basin belong to the La Luna and Umir formations. The La Luna Formation
contains organic rich marine limestone and shale of Cretaceous age deposited in a marine environment in a passive margin
basin. Biomarker and stable carbon isotope ratios from the La Luna hydrocarbon extracts are identical to crude oils mainly
from Tertiary reservoirs (Sarmiento, 2011).

The Middle Magdalena Basin approximately coincides with the depocenter of the main Cretaceous basin, where thick
sequences of organic-rich sediments accumulated during the Early Cretaceous. The generation and preservation of organic
rich sediments are due to coastal upwelling and partially restricted marginal seaway. Additionally, the Turonian-Campanian,
when the La Luna Formation was deposited, was a time of maximum sea level stand and exceptionally anoxic conditions.
Regionally, the richness of organic matter in the Cretaceous rocks and the relative proportions of marine and terrestrial
kerogen vary both vertically and laterally. Vertical variations are related to the position within individual transgressive-
regressive cycles, and lateral variations are related to proximity to the paralic margins of the Cretaceous basin.

The La Luna Formation is especially organic-rich. Kerogen petrography, H/C and O/C values and biomarker analysis of the
La Luna Formation indicate that its kerogen is dominantly marine Type II, amorphous, and oil-prone. The C15+ extractable
hydrocarbons from the La Luna gave values of almost 2,500 ppm, indicating good potential source rock. For the La Luna as
a whole, TOC values average 2.6%. Outcrop samples from the eastern margin of the Nuevo Mundo Syncline, 20 km west of
Bucaramanga, yielded TOC content for the carbonate-rich Pujamana and Salada members of 4.3%. The carbonate-poor
Galembo Member had TOC less than 0.9%, although elsewhere in the basin, TOC for this member is as high as 3.0%. The
Galembo Member has an average Hydrogen Index (HI) of 390 mg HC/g TOC. Vitrinite reflectance analyses from 73 La Luna
Formation samples in the basin gave Ro values of 0.8%, thus placing the La Luna Formation within the oil generation
window.

Barnardo et al. (2007) suggested that the La Luna Formation may not be the most productive source rock in the central
domain of the Middle Magdalena Basin.

The range in bulk composition seen in the oil is attributed to secondary alteration processes. The altered oil is similar to oil
modified by in-vitro bacterial degradation. Oil that migrated early in the Cenozoic appears to have been degraded due to
water washing and then locally subjected to reburial, reheating, and thermal cracking.

Maturation began during the Eocene with initial development of the foreland basin. According to Schamel (1991), peak
maturation was during the post-Miocene in the main synclines of the basin, such as Nuevo Mundo, Rio Minero, and
Guaduas. In these synclines, the source interval is at depths in excess of 4,000 m and within the oil window. Vitrinite
reflectance values indicate that most of the La Luna Formation is presently in the oil window in the Middle Magdalena Basin
and in the gas window in some of the more deeply buried areas.

Mudstones and limestones of the Aptian-Albian Tablazo Formation are an additional potential source rock. Although no oil-
source correlations have proven the potential for this unit in the Middle Magdalena Basin, Cordoba Ortiz (1998) and
Thompson-Butler et al. (2017) showed numerous accumulations in the Upper Magdalena Basin had been sourced at least
partially by Tablazo Formation oil. The Tablazo Formation was deposited during the initial stages of thermal subsidence
after Jurassic rifting. Geochemical features of the Tablazo Formation limestones show the kerogen is Type II. Total Organic

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 18 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Carbon (TOC) values average 2.5%, and vitrinite reflectance ranges between 0.5% and 2.7% (Mora, 2000).

Limestones and shales of the Rosablanca Formation are oil-prone (Type I/II kerogen), thus having a good generation
potential. Shales of the Cumbre and Simiti formations are also considered potential source rocks. Nevertheless, these and
Basal Limestone source rocks might exhaust their generation potential while reaching gas generation window (Aguilera et
al., 2010). It is noteworthy that Sarmiento (2011, and references therein) identified the Rosablanca, Paja, Tablazo and Simiti
source rocks as proven.

Thompson-Butler et al. (2017) identified five geochemically distinct oil families in the basin and connected them to at least
three source rock intervals, with likely mixing occurring as well.
Oil families 1 and 2 represent the majority of oil produced in the central part of the basin from the Upper Paleogene
reservoirs. They show strong correlations with marine shale source rocks. Oil family 3 correlates with marine shales and
carbonates, and oil families 4 and 5 are linked to marine marls and carbonates. C27 diasterane/regular sterane andTs/Tm
ratios indicate that oil family 5 is more thermally mature compared to families 1 through 4.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 19 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Reservoirs(s)

Lithostrat Unit Country Name Lithologies Chronostratigraphy

Avechucos and/or Tune Formation Colombia sandstone,conglom sandstone,silty Eocene-Oligocene


sandstone

Avechucos Formation Colombia sandstone Rupelian-Chattian

Basal Limestone Group Colombia limestone Valanginian-Lower Albian

Cantagallo Sandstone Colombia sandstone Lower Priabonian-Middle Priabonian

Chorro Group Colombia sandstone Priabonian-Priabonian

Chuspas Group Colombia sandstone Rupelian-Burdigalian

Colorado A Zone Colombia sandstone,argill sandstone Upper Oligocene-Upper Oligocene

Colorado Formation Colombia sandstone Aquitanian-Burdigalian

Esmeraldas D Zone Colombia sandstone,argill sandstone Eocene-Eocene

Esmeraldas Formation Colombia sandstone Middle Priabonian-Upper Priabonian

Galembo Member Colombia limestone Middle Coniacian-Lower Campanian

Honda Group Colombia sandstone Burdigalian-Messinian

La Luna Formation Colombia bituminous limestone Turonian-Lower Campanian

La Paz and/or Esmeraldas Formations Colombia sandstone,silty sand,conglom Eocene-Eocene


sandstone

La Paz C Zone Colombia sandstone Upper Eocene-Upper Eocene

La Paz E Zone Colombia sandstone Eocene-Eocene

La Paz Formation Colombia sandstone Lower Priabonian-Middle Priabonian

Lisama Formation Colombia sandstone Danian-Thanetian

Mugrosa 6D Zone Colombia sandstone Lower Oligocene-Lower Oligocene

Mugrosa B and C Zones Colombia sandstone Lower Miocene-Middle Miocene

Mugrosa B Zone Colombia sandstone,argill sandstone,conglom Lower Oligocene-Middle Oligocene


sandstone

Mugrosa C Zone Colombia argill sandstone,sandstone Lower Oligocene-Middle Oligocene

Mugrosa Formation Colombia sandstone Rupelian-Chattian

Pujamana Member Colombia limestone Upper Turonian-Lower Coniacian

Real Group Colombia sandstone Serravallian-Messinian

Rosablanca Formation Colombia limestone Valanginian-Hauterivian

Salada Member Colombia limestone Lower Turonian-Lower Turonian

Salto Limestone Formation Colombia argill limestone Upper Albian-Cenomanian

Tablazo Limestone Formation Colombia limestone Upper Aptian-Lower Albian

Umir Formation Colombia sandstone Middle Campanian-Maastrichtian

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Reservoir (remarks)
The Eocene-Oligocene fluvial channel sandstones of the Chorro and Chuspas groups are the principal reservoirs of the
Middle Magdalena Basin. Average porosities range from 20% to 25% and permeabilities from 500 mD to 1,000 mD. The
channel sands are sealed by interbedded shales.

The La Paz and Esmeraldas formations of the Chorro Group are dominantly sand-rich. Texturally, the reservoir intervals
show poor to moderate sorting and rounded to sub-rounded grains. The porosity depends primarily on the sandstone
maturity level but also on the degree of cementation. In the Llanito field, the porosity range is 18-23% while in the Colorado
field it is only 10 -12%. Permeability varies considerably due to a mixture of primary and secondary porosity, variations in
clay content, and variations in sorting. In the Provincia field, the La Paz Formation is interpreted as a fluvial system
composed of braided trunk channel, minor channel crevasse splay and flood plain environments. The channels are the best

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 20 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

reservoir facies with porosity averaging 16.7% and permeability averaging 409 mD (Suarez, 1996).

The Oligocene-Miocene sands of the Mugrosa and Colorado formations of the Chuspas Group are known reservoirs in
much of the Middle Magdalena Basin except in the north where they were eroded prior to deposition of the Miocene Real
Group. The fine- to coarse-grained sands are typically stacked with complex crosscutting relationships between individual
channels. In the Colorado Formation, the sands often occur as interbeds within a more massive shale section. The Mugrosa
Formation of the Chuspas Group contains the greatest volumes of hydrocarbons known in the basin (33%; Sarmiento,
2011).

Numerous minor reservoirs in the basin are found throughout the stratigraphic section from Lower Cretaceous to Pliocene.
Fractured carbonates of the Lower Cretaceous Tablazo Limestone and Rosablanca formations are productive in a number
of older fields in the northern part of the Middle Magdalena Basin (e.g., Olivo field). The fractures are dominantly vertical,
possibly resulting from bending strains during folding. The porosity range is 2% to 6%.

Fractured limestones of the La Luna Formation form minor reservoirs in the northern part of the basin (e.g., Olivo, Cocuyo 1,
Chuira). The latter was described in details by Rodriguez et al. (2015). The maximum matrix porosity is up to 16%.

Sands of the Upper Cretaceous Umir Formation are another minor reservoir in the basin. These sands are associated with
continued uplifting of the Central Cordillera; they form reservoirs in the Donna Maria-Patino, Los Angeles, Totumal, Oso
Padro, Popa 1, Popa 2, Rio Opia and Zoe fields/discoveries. The depositional environment of the Umir Formation has been
interpreted as neritic in the lower part to tidal flats and delta fronts in the upper part. Reservoir quality is generally, but in
some cases porosities reach 30%.

The Paleocene Lisama Formation is another minor sandstone reservoir. It comprises fine- to coarse-grained sand intervals
interbedded with gray shales. Porosity ranges between 7% and 25%. Minor coals occur in the upper part of the formation.
The Lisama Formation forms reservoirs in the Provincia, Tisquirama, Lebrija, Acordionero, Bonanza, Caronte, Los Angeles
and other fields. Thicknesses vary due to erosion associated with Lower to Middle Eocene uplift. In much of the central
Middle Magdalena Basin, the Lisama Formation has been severely thinned or removed. Where preserved, sands in the
upper part give good oil shows and adequate to good reservoir properties. Porosities range from 7% to 25% and
permeabilities from 50 mD to 500 mD.

Reservoirs in the Miocene Real Group consist of thick porous sandstones and conglomerates with limited potential due to
lack of effective seals. Average porosity and permeability are 28% and 1,200 mD.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 21 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Seal(s)

Lithostrat Unit Country Name Lithologies Chronostratigraphy

Basal Limestone Group Colombia shale Valanginian-Lower Albian

Chorro Group Colombia shale Priabonian-Priabonian

Chuspas Group Colombia shale Rupelian-Burdigalian

Colorado Formation Colombia shale Aquitanian-Burdigalian

Esmeraldas Formation Colombia shale Middle Priabonian-Upper Priabonian

Galembo Member Colombia shale Middle Coniacian-Lower Campanian

La Cira Member Colombia shale Lower Miocene-Lower Miocene

La Luna Formation Colombia shale Turonian-Lower Campanian

La Paz and/or Esmeraldas Formations Colombia shale Eocene-Eocene

La Paz Formation Colombia shale Lower Priabonian-Middle Priabonian

Lisama Formation Colombia shale Danian-Thanetian

Mugrosa Formation Colombia shale Rupelian-Chattian

Paja Formation Colombia shale Hauterivian-Middle Aptian

Pujamana Member Colombia shale Upper Turonian-Lower Coniacian

Real Group Colombia shale Serravallian-Messinian

Salada Member Colombia shale Lower Turonian-Lower Turonian

Simiti Shale Formation Colombia carbonaceous shale Middle Albian-Upper Albian

Umir Formation Colombia coaly shale Middle Campanian-Maastrichtian

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Seal (remarks)
Seals for the principal reservoirs of the Eocene-Oligocene Chorro and Chuspas groups are intraformational shales
deposited in floodplain and overbank environments.

Seals for the minor reservoirs in the basin are both intraformational and regional. Regional seals are formed by the
Cretaceous transgressional marine shales of the Simiti and Paja formations for reservoirs in the Tablazo and Rosablanca
formations, respectively. Reservoirs in the Upper Cretaceous La Luna Formation are sealed by intraformational marine
shales similar to the Paleocene Lisama Formation reservoirs. Reservoirs in the Miocene Real Group are sealed by
interbedded fluvial shales.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 22 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Structure (remarks)

Structures
The structural style of the Middle Magdalena Basin differs from that of the Upper Magdalena Basin to the south. Both east-
and west-verging thrusts occur in the Upper Magdalena Basin, and it is bound on both sides by reverse faults. The Middle
Magdalena Basin, on the other hand, is bound on the east by west-verging thrust faults and on the west by a series of strike-
slip faults.

The Middle Magdalena Basin occurs on the western edge of the Eastern Cordillera. During the Tertiary, it formed a foreland
basin to the Eastern Cordillera; sedimentary sequences thicken towards the east, and the main depocenter is along the
eastern side of the basin.

The eastern part of the basin is dominated by west-verging thrusts and associated folds. Many of the thrusts are thin-
skinned structures in the Cretaceous and younger cover but may be thick-skinned at depth and may rework basement
fabrics or Lower Mesozoic extensional structures. The Eastern Cordillera is formed of folded and thrusted Cretaceous and
Lower Tertiary sediments, equivalent to those of the Middle Magdalena Basin, but more intensely folded.

1) SYN-RIFT STRUCTURES

Extension and basin subsidence along north-northwest- and northeast-trending faults resulted in the development of a thick
Triassic-Jurassic graben fill. The north-northwest-trending faults probably had a strike-slip component.

Continental rifting and the initial formation of the passive margin period marked the Triassic-Middle Jurassic in northern
South America.

The extensional faults associated with the rifting are difficult to recognize in the Magdalena basins and the Eastern
Cordillera, but they are considered to trend northeast-southwest, parallel to the present structural trend. Some of the thin-
skinned faults in the Middle Magdalena Basin may reactivate Mesozoic extensional grabens. The thick Jurassic lavas of the
Magdalena basins represent the extrusive activity associated with the volcanic arc.

In the Eastern Cordillera, extension continued or was renewed into the Early Cretaceous. Lower Cretaceous marine
sediments, several kilometers thick, occur in the northern part of the Eastern Cordillera, which must have formed one of the
main rift basins during this extensional event. Extensional faulting was terminated during Late Jurassic-earliest Cretaceous
time (Pindell et al., 2000).

2) PASSIVE MARGIN STRUCTURES

By Aptian-Albian time normal faulting had ceased and thermal subsidence led to a marine transgression during the Late
Cretaceous across much of Colombia, reaching a maximum extent in the Turonian-Santonian.

During the Cretaceous, the Colombian autochthon was essentially a passive Atlantic type margin. In the absence of
subduction and volcanism, the strata development was controlled by thermal subsidence.

Absence of important post-rift structures is due to the lack of significant uplift events or periods of tectonically induced
foredeep basin loading during the Cretaceous time (Villamil, 1998). Subsidence continued to keep pace with sedimentation
until end-Cretaceous times when a volcanic arc (e.g., Pinon, Amaime terranes) collided with South America to create the
Tertiary compressional deformation.

3) EARLY FORELAND STRUCTURES

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 23 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Late Cretaceous times in northwest South America are a transitional phase between a tectonically quiescent passive margin
and a convergent margin. During the Maastrichtian, the Pinon volcanic arc collided with the margin of South America. This
compressional deformation affected both the Central and Eastern Cordillera. In the Middle Magdalena Basin, two important
regional unconformities occur, suggesting two important compressional events. The first of these unconformities occurs
between the Paleocene Lisama Formation and the Eocene Chorro Group; the second one is between the Oligocene-Lower
Miocene Chuspas Group and the Miocene Real Group. Both unconformities, which post-date uplift on both east- and west-
verging folds and thrusts, are most prominent in the northern and eastern parts of the Middle Magdalena Basin, close to the
Santander Massif.

In the central part of the basin, Paleogene uplifts are confined to faults that bound the Casabe-Llanito and Cira-Infantas
fields. There is relatively little structuring near the Cambao, Dos Hermanos and La Salinas thrusts in the south. However, the
Villeta and Portones anticlines in the Eastern Cordillera were active at this time, as evidenced by emerald-forming
hydrothermal activity along associated fracture systems. The main thrust structures, which bound the eastern part of the
Middle Magdalena Basin, appear to be later, of Neogene age.

Crustal thickening led to flexural subsidence and the formation of thick Tertiary sediments, which thin towards the west and
northwest, away from the Eastern Cordillera. However, important extensional faults developed on the western margin of the
basin. These are possibly related to regional rotational strains, flexural bending on the Caribbean margin or to strains
developed during flexural bending of the crust due to tectonic loading of the Eastern Cordillera.

The structures appear regional; they are not confined to the Middle Magdalena Basin close to the Eastern Cordillera, but
form the main structures in the Lower Magdalena Basin, to the northwest, as well. The faults cut the Miocene sediments,
and hence, some of the movement must be Miocene-Pliocene in age. However, there are important facies changes in
Eocene-Oligocene sediments across these faults, and therefore, the structures must have been active during the Early
Tertiary as well. They may be reactivated Mesozoic structures. In the northern part of the basin, the normal faults trend
northeast-southwest. However, in the southern part, faults such as the structure bounding the Velasquez field trend north-
south to north-northwest. The main bounding fault of the Velasquez field has northeast-southwest trending splays
suggesting that it is a tear fault. Thus, the main extension direction is considered to be northwest-southeast, parallel to the
trend of the Eastern Cordillera. The north-northwest trending structures are considered to be basement lineaments,
reactivated with oblique to lateral movement. They may have been transfer systems during Paleozoic plate accretion and
Mesozoic extension.

The obduction of the Pinon volcanic terrane onto northwest South America in latest Cretaceous times caused orogenesis
and compression in the western part of the Eastern Cordillera, north of Bogota, which in turn led to the development of a
foreland basin to the west. The basin was filled with clastic sediments from the rising mountain chain.

Deformation and foreland basin development continued episodically throughout the Tertiary, culminating in the main phase
of tectonic uplift of the Eastern Cordillera in the Miocene-Pliocene.

4) LATE FORELAND STRUCTURES

Deformation of this age is responsible for most of the structures observed in the Middle Magdalena Basin. The main uplift of
the Eastern Cordillera was initiated during Miocene-Pliocene times. Compressional deformation formed new thrusts, which
are dominantly west-verging, and these thrusts reworked and reactivated Lower Tertiary moderately dipping thrusts. Many of
the structures progress from a thick-skinned style at depth to a thin-skinned detachment style in Cretaceous and younger
rocks. Some of the structures may be influenced by pre-existing basement features.

Reactivation of basement tear faults, and possibly normal faults in the eastern and central parts of the basin, occurred
during tectonic inversion to produce forced folds in the cover. For example, the Casabe field structure is dominantly an
extensional fault, but the hanging wall has been inverted so that the sediments have been uplifted. Some along-strike
extension of the inversion structures occurred, possibly associated with block rotation about a vertical axis. The east-west-
trending normal faults curve toward the northeast-southwest structure indicating right lateral shear. Some of the normal

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 24 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

faults have the kinematic form of right lateral Riedel shears.

The La Cira-Infantas Thrust was reactivated, tightening the earlier footwall syncline into a footwall anticline in Eocene-
Oligocene sediments and developing a fault propagation fold in the Mesozoic strata.

The Infantas-Aguas Claras Fault trend has faults that are steeply dipping in the Tertiary section. In the Infantas field, the
reverse fault appears to steepen to about 70-80 deg. Along strike, near the La Cira field, the fault has a more moderate
easterly dip. The steep dip of the thrust suggests either a strike-slip component of movement or back steepening during
development of the structure. The Las Monas structure on the same trend has a similar structural development.

The style of Late Tertiary deformation varies across the basin. In the west, the structures remain extensional, reworking
earlier Paleogene normal faults. Along the center of the basin, the Paleogene faults are slightly inverted, as in the Casabe
field. Further east, there is evidence for more inversion, together with thin-skinned thrusting, linking to structures in the
Eastern Cordillera. Fault-propagation folds developed above basement anticlines control the eastern oilfields. Uplift of the
basement structures has hindered low-angle fault displacement causing the growth of fault propagation folds and associated
thrusts.

Individual thrusts cannot be traced along the entire boundary of the Eastern Cordillera. The Cambao Thrust transfers
displacement to the Dos Hermanos Thrust to the north, which in turn transfers displacement to the La Salinas Thrust.
Hence, the edge of the basin steps eastwards to the north. The thrusts carry large hanging wall anticlines, which are
fractured by north-south and east-west-trending faults. The Villeta shales are thick on the western edge of the Eastern
Cordillera, related to thickening into the Cretaceous graben system. The dip of the main bounding fault is uncertain. The
imbricate thrusts of the Cambao system, along the eastern edge of the southern Middle Magdalena Basin, are here
considered to be footwall-shortcut thrusts. However, farther north the Dos Hermanos and Las Salinas Thrusts appear to be
low-angle structures. These would fit a structural interpretation where the master normal fault originally dipped west with the
development of low-angle west-verging back thrusts. For example, the Dos Hermanos Thrust uplifts basement in an
imbricate zone but does not show the characteristic hanging wall anticline associated with a fault that is steepening at depth.
It appears to be a low-angle thrust for some distance east into the Eastern Cordillera.

Jones (1995) supports thrusting on the eastern side of the basin that is generated by gravity gliding from the uplifted Eastern
Cordillera. He argues that the shortening, recorded by the Dos Hermanos and Las Salinas thrusts, can be balanced by thin-
skinned extension farther east. However, no evidence is given for such extensional structures. Seismic data from this part of
the Andes show only thrust tectonics.
Right-lateral strike-slip faults occur in the eastern part of the Eastern Cordillera. The Bucaramanga-Santa Marta Fault
bounds the northeastern edge of the Middle Magdalena Basin and has left lateral strike-slip movement during the Pliocene-
Recent. The Bucaramanga Fault probably acted as a large transfer structure.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 25 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Generation - Migration (remarks)

Generation and Migration


The oil in the basin may have been generated to the east within the deep Cretaceous Eastern Cordillera Basin and migrated
updip prior to the uplift of the Eastern Cordillera. However, Cretaceous rocks beneath many of the major synclines, e.g. the
Nuevo Mundo, the Rio Mineras and the Guaderas Synclines, are at depths more than 4 km and currently are well within the
oil window. The La Luna Formation may still be generating oil at the present time within the deeper parts of the basin as
shown by the presence of oil in fractures associated with Miocene-Pliocene movements. However, in the Eastern Cordillera
and possibly the eastern parts of the Middle Magdalena Basin, Cretaceous source rocks entered the oil window during the
Early Tertiary. A comparison of the burial and maturation history in the Eastern Foothills with that of the central part of the
basin shows that there may have been several phases of oil generation/migration, with the first phase occurring in the Early
Tertiary. This oil may have migrated westwards into the Middle Magdalena Basin. Further, sedimentary and tectonic burial
during the Miocene-Pliocene may have generated a second phase of oil maturation and migration. As long as oil had not
formed and migrated from the deep synclines prior to the formation of Miocene structures, these synclines may provide an
additional charge for traps within the basin.

Asphaltic veins and fractures within the Cretaceous and Tertiary sediments suggest the movement of large amounts of
petroleum. Tar-rich oil seeps associated with gas are common, often close to faults, particularly the west-directed thrusts of
Miocene-Pliocene age. Gilsonite bitumen dikes and veins in the basin are related to extensional fractures originated by the
left lateral movement of the Santa Marta Fault, a large structural feature of Colombian Andes (Mejia et al., 2014).

A detailed study of the oils in the La Cira and Infantas fields suggests that the oils have been degraded and reheated
(Dickey, 1992). A burial history model indicates that the La Luna source rock did not reach peak oil generation and expulsion
until the Late Miocene, as a result of the erosion of the Upper Cretaceous and Paleocene sequences. Dickey (1992)
concludes that the oil must have been generated farther east where there was less erosion at the end of the Paleocene; the
Maastrichtian/Paleocene Umir and Lisama formations are preserved and the Eocene is much thicker. The oil probably
started generating in the Late Cretaceous with initial migration in the Paleocene-Eocene. Following migration, the oil
became degraded and was then trapped and thermally cracked in Eocene reservoir sands until expulsion in the Late
Miocene. It is proposed that the oils were generated in the Eastern Cordillera Basin during the Paleogene and migrated
updip to the west before the major inversion of the Eastern Cordillera in the Miocene. Alternatively, some of the oils could
have been sourced from Cretaceous sequences at depths more than 4,000 m beneath the three major synclines (Nuevo
Mundo, Rio Mineras and Guaduas) along the eastern margin of the basin.

Lighter oils are generally found in structural traps in the deeper parts of the basin along the eastern margin. Heavier oils are
generally concentrated on the western margin. The difference in bulk composition of the oils may be related to a secondary
alteration process and to fluid flow through the basin, with the oils in the west being exposed to meteoric waters and
biodegradation. Even some of the oils found in the east have a chemical composition that suggests they have been
degraded, accompanied by water washing and then reheated. Oils in the eastern part of the basin matured during the
Paleocene, but following uplift and erosion, the source rocks and the early traps were penetrated by meteoric water. During
the Oligocene-Miocene, thick sequences of sediment were deposited on the eastern side of the Magdalena Valley.
Additional oil was expelled from the source rocks at this time. Any oil reservoired in the Eocene on the eastern side would
have been reheated.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 26 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Exploration Possibility (remarks)

Exploration Possibilities
Exploration in the basin has largely been guided by surface seeps and surface anticlines, supported by seismic data, and
has been focused on Tertiary reservoirs. Subsurface mapping of detailed structures and stratigraphic models for reservoir
intervals could considerably aid exploration. Structural modeling and section restoration could help model early hydrocarbon
pathways. The search for purely stratigraphic traps in the fluvial sand reservoirs has hardly begun. Paleogene fluvial
sandstones reservoirs with good petrophysical lose their properties drastically with increasing depth along the eastern part
of the basin and the foothills due to diagenetic burial effects. This high risk of reservoir quality may become a critical factor in
deep portions of the basin (Sarmiento, 2011).

New exploration campaigns should be directed toward evaluation of the potential of the Cretaceous sequence, stratigraphic
traps in the Tertiary units, and structural traps along the eastern border of the basin. This border is a fold and thrust belt
similar to the Llanos Fold and thrust belt where the giant Cusiana field is located. In the fold and thrust belt, the primary play
concept is ramp anticlines and fault propagation folds in the hanging walls of thin-skinned thrusts or steeper reverse faults.
However, more subtle traps of limited reserves may be found on the flanks of tilted blocks and in structures that are
secondary to the main folds and thrusts.

Sub-thrust structures have not been fully explored and may make an important future play, such as the one in the footwall of
the Provincia and Bituima faults. Care must be taken with this type of play. The migration between the source rock and the
reservoir must be via thrust faults, and hence the thrusts cannot be impermeable barriers. Many of the traps may have been
depleted by leakage of hydrocarbons. This is confirmed by the observations of oil seeps along the surface traces of the
faults. However, some faults or parts of faults must make effective seals as oil accumulations do occur against thrusts. It is
possible that some of the loss from seepage may be recharged by fresh oil migration since much of the La Luna Formation
source rock is presently in the oil window. The quality of the trap may not be critical for a successful prospect, since over
much of the region, the oil is currently migrating and re-charging traps.

Additional discoveries may be made in the western zone of the basin in structures on both sides of wrench related faults.
This play has been proved in Cantagallo-Yarigui, Llanito, Cristalina, Casabe, and Velasquez fields. These faults have been
described before as normal down to the east faults. However, strike slip movement is a critical factor for hydrocarbon
accumulation. According to Maxus (1994), the wrench origin of these faults is supported by the regional relationship with the
Palestina Fault, by the straight pattern of the fault trace, by the differences in unit thickness across the faults, by the offset of
the Magdalena River along the Casabe Fault, and by the seal effectiveness of the Velasquez Fault.

The southern portion of the basin, between the Bituima Fault and the Central Cordillera, can still be considered
underexplored to date (October 2016). The suggested model for fault kinematics in the Eastern Cordillera Basin can be
tested there. If the master normal faults dipped west, as suggested for the northern part of the basin, then large volumes of
oil could have migrated westwards up the dip of the basin prior to uplift of the Eastern Cordillera. However, if the master
normal faults dipped east, there would be no large kitchen area to the east of the southern Middle Magdalena Basin. All the
oil in that part of the basin would have to be generated beneath the thrusts on the east side of the basin or migrated along
the basin's length. This second model suggests that the southern part of the basin is far less prospective than the north.

Nevertheless, in the southern part of the basin, small accumulations in stratigraphic traps have been discovered in the Toqui
Toqui and Totare fields. These stratigraphic traps are in the fluvial channel sandstones of the Real Group.

Additional opportunities for stratigraphic traps have been conceptualized but little explored so far. Suarez (1996) proposed
pinch-outs of the La Paz Formation due to onlap onto the Sogamoso High. Overlying floodplain mudstones provide the
updip and overlying seals. However, the lateral seal, which is the Eocene unconformity, may be not an effective seal since
this horizon has been considered by some authors (Mora et al., 1996) as the main hydrocarbon migration path.

Stratigraphic traps also include point bar sandstones interbedded with floodplain deposits of the Esmeraldas and Mugrosa
formations and deltaic channel sandstones of the Lisama Formation. These types of trap have been documented with

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 27 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

outcrop and core analysis, improvement of 2D seismic quality and 3D seismic. The main risk of these purely stratigraphic
traps is hydrocarbon charge of the channels and point bar sandstones. Pure-stratigraphic traps may in fact represent a
significant portion of the yet-to-find resources for the whole basin (Sarmiento, 2011).

The Cretaceous sequence could also be a good exploration target in terms of both conventional and unconventional
reserves. The Rosablanca, La Luna and Umir formations already produce from conventional reservoirs. Along with the Simiti
Formation, they possess significant shale oil & gas potential, though major studies are needed to define their real potential.

The primary porosity of Cretaceous fractured limestone reservoirs, usually low, was almost completely destroyed by
cementation and other diagenetic processes. Therefore, the quality of these potential reservoirs involves a high degree of
risk. In exploration of a specific trap with a Cretaceous potential reservoir, fracture patterns, intensity, distribution and other
reservoir properties should be quantitatively analyzed (Sarmiento, 2011).

Coal resources in the uppermost Cretaceous Umir and Paleocene Lisama formations may deliver additional hydrocarbon
volumes in the basin. These units may be secondary gas-prone source rocks with shale gas potential. In addition, coal bed
methane resources entrained in these coal seams and their proximity to existing transport infrastructure justify their
evaluation and exploration (Sarmiento, 2011).

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 28 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Data Availability (remarks)


Data Availability
1) USEFUL CONTACTS

Ministry of Mines and Energy


German Arce Zapata (Minister)
Calle 43 No. 57 - 31 CAN
Bogota D.C
Colombia

Telephone:57-1-220 0300
E-mail:menergia@minminas.gov.co

Empresa Colombiana de Petroleos (Ecopetrol)


Juan Carlos Echeverry (CEO)
Carrera 13 No. 36-24
Edificio Principal
Bogota, Distrito Capital
Colombia

Telephone:57-1-2344870
Fax:57-1-2344099
E-mail:investors@ecopetrol.com.co
Website:http://www.ecopetrol.com.co/

2) PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION DATABASE

An integrated database of petroleum exploration and production data for the Middle Magdalena Basin is maintained by:

IHS Markit
1401 Enclave Pkwy, Suite 200,
Houston, Texas 77077
U.S.A.

Telephone:1 (713) 840-8282


Telefax: 1 (713) 599-9100
e-mail: global@ihsmarkit.com
Internet : www.ihsmarkit.com

Regular updates on exploration and production activity in the basin can be obtained from IHS Markit GEPS reports and the
weekly International Energy Letter. Detailed legal and fiscal information is published in IHS Markit PEPS software.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 29 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

NFW Drilling by Operator

NFW Drilling by Operator


Middle Magdalena Basin

200
No of Wells

150

100

50

0
o

s
r

p
l)

..
te
n

.
.

..
..
..

do

er
C

or

b.
w
o

ca
P
rc
a
m

le
il

th
C

om
on

ol
an

ce
kn

di
O
u

te

ro
il

O
tr
C
le

yn

ol
vi
bi

O
n

al

n
pe

et
ro

ll

(I

er
U

C
om

ic

S
f

P
he

co

ul
et

S
op

y
an
d
C
ol

rg
S

E
P

n
Tr

bi
C

ie
m

ne
o
as

om
it
u
a

E
ex

le

C
es

h
ic

ra
ol
ro

a
T

pr

bi

er
et
m

om

Ti
P
E

ol

n
t'

ra
In

Operator

Oil Gas Dry/Shows Oil and Gas Unknown

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 30 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

NFW General Content Per Decade

NFW General Content Per Decade


Middle Magdalena Basin. Drilling History (using the Well Spud year)
grouped into decades by result (general content)
90

80

70
No of Wells

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0

9
90

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

00

01
1,

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-2

-2
00

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

00

10
re
o

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

20

20
ef
B

Decade

Oil Gas Dry/Shows Oil and Gas Unknown

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 31 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

NFW spud to completion by Total Depth

NFW spud to completion by Total Depth


Middle Magdalena Basin. Number of rig days per metreage for NFW
wells

700

600

500
Rig Days

400

300

200

100

0
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
Metreage

Rig Days - Total Metreage

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 32 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Liquid Production by Year

Liquid Production by Year


Middle Magdalena BasinAverage daily liquid Production by year for the
5 best Fields

150

125
Production Mb/day

100

75

50

25

0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Year

La Cira Casabe Infantas Yarigui-Cantagallo Provincia Others

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 33 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Gas Production by Year

Gas Production by Year


Middle Magdalena BasinAverage daily gas Production by year for the 5
best Fields

150,000

125,000
Production Mscf/day

100,000

75,000

50,000

25,000

0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Year

Provincia Payoa La Cira Casabe Infantas Others

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 34 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Reserves Size Distribution

Reserves Size Distribution


Middle Magdalena Basin. No of Fields for each range of
Proven+Probable Recoverable Reserves; (Oil,Condensate and Gas totals)

45

40

35
Number of Fields

30

25

20

15

10

0
-1

-5

0
0
0

0
0

0
0

0
5

0
0
-1

50

00
5

0
-2

-5
0

0
-1

-2

-5

0
5

-1

-2

-5

5
0

0
1

>
0
5

00

00
0

0
1

10

25
Reserve Size (MMboe)

Gas Fields Oil Fields

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 35 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Reserves Size Distribution (Decade)

Reserves Size Distribution (Decade)


Middle Magdalena Basin. Volume of Proven+Probable Recoverable
Reserves (Total gas and liquid ) added by decade discovered

1100
1000
900
Reserves (MMboe)

800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0

9
90

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

00

01
1,

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-1

-2

-2
00

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

00

10
re
o

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

20

20
ef
B

Decade

Liquids MMboe Gas MMboe

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 36 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Reserves Probability Distribution

Reserves Probability Distribution


Middle Magdalena Basin. The Fields with Proven+Probable Recoverable
Reserves are summed to calculate the probablility of each Reserve
MMBoe occuring
100
90
80
70
Probability

60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01 0.02 0.1 0.2 1 2 3 45 10 2030 100 200 1000
Resource Size (MMboe)

Resource MMboe

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 37 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Reserves Cumulative for Fields

Reserves Cumulative for Fields


Middle Magdalena Basin. Creaming Curve showing Cumulative Liquid
MMbbl and Cumulative Gas MMboe reserves of Fields
4,000
Cumulative Reserves MMboe

3,500

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0
18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 02 05 08 11 14 17 19
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

Disc Year

All Fields Liquid MMbbl All Fields Gas MMboe

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 38 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Remaining Reserves Size Status

Remaining Reserves Size Status


Middle Magdalena Basin. No of Fields for each range of Remaining
Reserves for six different General production status types

55
50
45
Number of Fields

40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
-1

-5

0
0
0

0
0

0
0

0
5

0
0
-1

50

00
5

0
-2

-5
0

0
-1

-2

-5

0
5

-1

-2

-5

5
0

0
1

>
0
5

00

00
0

0
1

10

25
Remaining PP Reserve Size (MMboe)

Abandoned Discovery Producing Temp Shut in No data Developing

© Copyright 2022 IHS Markit

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 39 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Images

Title Doc Id

Basin Location Map (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000328480

Field Location Map (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000328481

Structural Framework Map (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000186385

Geothermal Gradient Map (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000186387

API Isogravity Map (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000186388

Stratigraphic Chart (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000186389

WNW-SSE Regional Geological Cross-section A-A' (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000186390

WNW-ESE Regional Geological Cross-section B-B' (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000186391

WNW-SSE Regional Geological Cross-section C-C' (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000186394

Schematic Geological Evolution of the Northern Part of the Basin (Middle 100000186395
Magdalena Basin)

Isopach Map of La Luna Formation (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000186396

Typical Log (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000186397

Petroleum System Map (Middle Magdalena Basin) 100000328482

Examples of Tertiary and Cretaceous Structural Play Types (Middle 100000187193


Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 40 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Basin Location Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 41 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Field Location Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 42 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Structural Framework Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 43 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Geothermal Gradient Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 44 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

API Isogravity Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 45 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Stratigraphic Chart (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 46 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

WNW-SSE Regional Geological Cross-section A-A' (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 47 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

WNW-ESE Regional Geological Cross-section B-B' (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 48 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

WNW-SSE Regional Geological Cross-section C-C' (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 49 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Schematic Geological Evolution of the Northern Part of the Basin (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 50 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Isopach Map of La Luna Formation (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 51 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Typical Log (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 52 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Petroleum System Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 53 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Examples of Tertiary and Cretaceous Structural Play Types (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 54 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Bibliography

A.I.P.C. - Colombia, 1996. Contrato de Asociacion Puli, Prospecto Chicoral.

Acosta, J., Graham, R., Sassi, W., 2003. Structural interpretation and source rock maturation modeling along two distinct transects in the Upper/Middle
Magdalena Basin, Colombia. Memorias VIII Simposio Bolivariano: Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas, Volumenes I and II, Cartagena de
Indias, Septiembre 21-24, 2003, Unraveling the Potential. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP).
Page(s) 1-15

Acosta, F.E., Obando, E., 1984. Desarrollo estructural del extremo sur del Valle Medio del Magdalena (Structural development of the extreme southern Middle
Magdalena Basin). 23rd Field Annual Conference, Colombian Society of Petroleum Geologists and Geophysicists. Colombian Society of Petroleum Geologists
and Geophysicists, Bogota, Colombia. Page(s) 1-14

Aguiar, Y., 1994. Interpretacion estructural area provincia, Valle Medio del Magdalena. Ecopetrol Internal Technical Report. Page(s) 1-38

Aguilera, R., Cunningham, R.D., 2000. Geology and reservoir characterisation of the fractured Cimarrona (Maestrichtian) in the Guaduas Field, Magdalena
Valley of Colombia; A potential giant oilfield. 16th World Petroleum Congress, 11-15 June, Calgary, Canada. Publisher varies, locations varies, International.

Aguilera, R., 2009. Play Calcareo de la Cuenca del Valle Medio del Magdalena. ¿Un Gigante Dormido?. Memorias X Simposio Bolivariano Exploracion
Petrolera Cuencas Subandinas, Cartagena, Colombia, July 26-29, 2009, CD-ROM. Page(s) 1-4

Aguilera, R.C., Sotelo, V., Burgos, C., Arce, C., Gomez, C., Mojica, J., Castillo, H., Jimenez, D., Osorno, J., 2010. Organic Geochemistry Atlas of Colombia.
Earth Sciences Research Journal, 14 (Special Edition). Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Geociencias, Colombia.
Page(s) 105-117

Aguja, M.A., Sarmiento, M.L., Guzman, G.N., Vargas, C.H., 2010. Estimated shale gas resources in the Middle Magdalena Valley and Eastern Cordillera
Basins of Colombia. 27th TSOP Annual Meeting, 12-16 September, 2010, Denver, Colorado,
USA.

Ahlborn, R.C., 1998. Eocene plays and Cretaceous hydrocarbons in western Falcon, Zulia and Falcon states, Venezuela. Extended Abstracts 1998 American
Association of Petroleum Geologists Annual Convention, Search and Discovery Article #90937. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK,
United States. Page(s) 1-4

Alberdi, M., Tocco, R., Parnaud, F., Ruggiero, A., Gonzalez, S., Picon, A., 1996. Vertical and lateral variations of the geochemical characteristics in the Upper
Cretaceous of western Venezuelan Basin. In: Mello, M.R., Trindade, L.A.F., Hessel, M.H.R. (ed), 4th Latin American Congress on Organic Geochemistry;
Extended Abstracts. Latin American Association of Organic Geochemistry (ALAGO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Page(s) 1-6

Alberdi, M., Maguregui, J., Toro, C., Marquina, M., 1996. Geochemical and geological control on filling history of Eocene reservoirs, Maracaibo Basin,
Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1267

Alfonso, A., 1985. Los episodios evaporiticos de la formacion Rosa Blanca. In: Etayo-Serna, F., Laverde, M.F. (ed), Proyecto Cretacico, Publicaciones
Geologicas Especiales del INGEOMINAS 16. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geologico-Mineras (INGEOMINAS). Page(s) XVI1-XVI19

Amaya, M., Lozano, E., Gambaretto, W., Peralta-Vargas, J., 2010. Casabe: New Tricks for an Old Field. Oilfield Review, Spring 2010, Vol. 22, No. 1. Elsevier,
International.

Amaya, R., Nunez, G., Hernandez, J., Gambaretto, W., 2009. 3D Seismic Application in Remodeling Brownfield Waterflooding Pattern. SPE 2009 Latin
American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Cartagena, Colombia, 31 May-03 June 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United
States.

Amoco Colombia Petroleum Company, 1998. Amoco and partners begin gas deliveries from Colombian natural gas field. Amoco Press Release.

Anderson, J.L., 1945. The Petroleum Geology of Colombia, South America. Tulsa Geological Society Digest, 13. Page(s) 46-52

Anonymous, 1987. Orca Annual Review.

Anonymous, 1985. Big waterflood under way in Colombian field. Oil and Gas Journal, November. Pennwell, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 70

Anonymous, 2012. 2012 Update to the 2010 Palagua Field ESIA


Environmental and Social Impact of a 32 well expansion project. Union Temporal - Ismocol Joshi Parko, Environmental Impact Assessment Report. Union
Temporal - Ismocol Joshi Parko. Page(s) 1-348

Anonymous, 1999. Colombia: Harken Energy Corp., Houston, reported encouragement from Laurel 1. Oil and Gas Journal, July 19. Pennwell, Tulsa, OK,
United States. Page(s) 82

Apotria, T.G., Wilkerson, M.S., Knewtson, S.L., 1996. 3D geometry and controls on fracturing in a natural fault-bend fold; Rosario Field, Maracaibo Basin,
Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1268

Azpiritxaga, I., Murat, B., 1993. Types of Cretaceous carbonate platforms in western Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists 1993 Annual
Convention. American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists. Page(s) 70

Baptista, N., Scherer, W., 1996. Geology and geochemistry of the La Luna Formation type sections in the Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. American Association
of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1271-1272

Barrero, D., 2000. Evolucion tectonoestratigraphica y tipo de plays en el Valle Superior del Magdalena. Ecopetrol Internal Report. Page(s) 1-19

Bayona, G.A., Mora, G., 1994. The Saldana Formation; a product of continental stratovolcano activity in a Triassic-Jurassic back-arc basin, Colombia.
Geological Society of America, 1994 Annual Meeting, Abstracts with Program - Geological Society of America, 26 (7). Geological Society of America (GSA),
Boulder, CO, United States. Page(s) 117-118

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 55 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Bedregal, R., Bromfield-Young, S., Conway, I., Hicks, A., Machado, F., Reinsch, T., Tanner, F., 2020. Colombia’s onshore basins are challenged to meet
domestic oil and gas demand and export revenue goals. Plays and Basins Strategic Report. IHS Markit. Page(s) 1-31

Beltran, M., Lagoe, M.B., 1995. Lower Miocene foraminiferal biofacies and paleoenvironments in the Lower Magdalena Basin, Colombia: implications for
sequence stratigraphy. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1995 Annual Convention (Houston, TX, March 5-8, 1995), American Association of
Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Annual Meeting Abstracts, 4. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists & Mineralogists. Page(s) 8

Bernardo, L.M., Rubiano, J.L., Caro, M., Alfonso, C.A., 2007. New petroleum generation model of the Middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia: Is the Luna
Formation the most prolific source rock?. AAPG 2007 Annual Convention, April 1-4, 2007, Long Beach, California, Search and Discover Article #90063.
AAPG.

Boesi, T., Goddard, D., 1991. A new geologic model related to the distribution of hydrocarbon source rocks in the Falcon Basin, northwestern Venezuela. In:
Biddle, K.T. (ed), Active Margin Basins, Memoir American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 52, Chapter 11. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 303-319

Boesi, T., Higgs, R., Lorente, M.A., Mompart, L., Murat, B., Testamarck, J.S., Falcon, R., 1993. Facies and sedimentary environments of the Cretaceous La
Luna Formation in San Pedro del Rio section, Venezuelan Andes; a multidisciplinary study. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International
Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK,
United States. Page(s) 308

Bordine, B.W., 1974. Neogene Biostratigraphy and Paleoenvironments, Lower Magdalena Basin, Colombia. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35 (5).
Page(s) 2339B-2340B

Bostock, W.H., Williams, D.B., Schaub, H.P., 1948. Oil fields of the Royal Dutch Shell Group in Western Venezuela. Bulletin American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, 32 (4). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 517-628

Brown, P., Caceres, H., Malterre, E., Lopez, C., 1994. Tectonic evolution of the Cordillera Oriental of Colombia. American Association of Petroleum Geologists
Annual Convention, Annual Meeting Abstracts - American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists,
(1994). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists. Page(s) 112

Bueno, R., Kanes, W.H., 1989. Overview of exploration potential of Colombia. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 73 (3). American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 339

Bueno, R., 1979. A geologic section between Bucaramanga and La Uribe, Middle Magdalena Valley, 1971. Geological Field-Trips Colombia, 1959-1978.
Page(s) 325-348

Bueno, R., 1970. Guidebook to the geology of the Tubara region, Lower Magdalena Basin. Colombian Society of Petroleum Geologists and Geophysicists,
Annual Field Conference, Guidebook, 11. Page(s) 1-52

Buitrago, J., Murphy, R., Zannetos, A., 1994. Integrated technical evaluation contract, Santander Sector. Exxon and Ecopetrol Internal Technical Report.
Page(s) 1-38

Burgl, H., 1961. Historia geologica de Colombia. Revista Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Fisicas y Naturales, 11 (43). Page(s) 137-191

Butler, J.W. Jr, 1942. Geology of Honda district, Colombia. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 26 (5). American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 793-837

Campbell, C.J., Burgl, H., 1965. Section through the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia, South America. Bulletin Geological Society of America, 76 (1). Geological
Society of America (GSA), Boulder, CO, United States. Page(s) 567-590

Canas, J.A., Lobo, A., 1995. Optimization del recobro secundario de hidrocarburos en el Campo La Cira. Memorias 6(o) Congreso Colombiano del Petroleo,
1. Page(s) 23-30

Cardozo, L., Ramirez, C., 1985. Ambientes de deposito de la Formacion Rosablanca: area de Villa de Leiva. In: Etayo-Serna, F., Laverde, M.F. (ed),
Proyecto Cretacico, Publicaciones Geologicas Especiales del INGEOMINAS 16. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geologico-Mineras (INGEOMINAS).
Page(s) XIII1-XII17

Castro, R., Canas-Marin, W., Osorio, R., Soto, C., 2009. Definition of Reservoir Compartmentalization Applying Compositional Gradients: Mugrosa B
Formation in Middle Magdalena Valley Basin, Lisama Field, Colombia. SPE 2009 Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference,
Cartagena, Colombia, 31 May-03 June 2009. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Cediel, F., 2018. Phanerozoic orogens of Northwestern South America: Cordilleran-type orogens. Taphrogenic tectonics. The Maracaibo orogenic float. The
Choco-Panama Intender. In: Cediel, F., Shaw, R.P. (ed), Geology and Tectonics of Northwestern South America, Frontiers in Earth Sciences, Chapter 1.
Springer International, Berlin, Federal Republic of Germany. Page(s) 3-96

Cediel, F., 1969. Die Giron-Gruppe; eine frueh-Mesozoische Molasse der Ostkordillere Kolumbiens (The Giron Group; Early Mesozoic molasse deposits in the
Cordillera Oriental of Colombia). Neues Jahrbuch fuer Geologie und Palaeontologie, Abhandlungen, 133 (2). E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung
(Naegele U. Obermiller) Stuttgart, Germany. Page(s) 111-162

Cediel, F., 1968. El Grupo Giron, una molasa Mesozoica de la Cordillera Oriental (The Giron Group, a Mesozoic molasses in the Cordillera Oriental). Boletin
de Geologia Colombian Servicio Geologico Nacional, 16 (1-3). Page(s) 5-95

Cespedes, S., Ballesteros, C., Barrera, P., Cantisano, M., Ceron, J., Forero, S., Galvis, H., Higuera, I., Hurtado, A., Lopez, A., Marfisi, N., Restrepo, D.,
Rodriguez, C., Zamora, W., 2015. State-of-the-art of the geological knowledge of unconventional reservoirs in the Middle Magdalena Valley of Colombia.
AAPG Geoscience Technology Workshop, Expanding Unconventional Resources in Colombia with New Science-From Heavy Oil to Shale Gas/Shale Oil
Opportunities, Bogota, Colombia, December 10-11, 2014, Search & Discovery Article #90212.

Chicaiza, D., Finol, E., Rodriguez, L., Monroy, M., 2013. Aggressive Applications: Successful Beam Pump Systems Under Ultra High GOR and Deviated
Conditions in Guaduas Field, Colombia. SPE Artificial Lift Conference, 21-22 May, Cartagena, Colombia, SPE-165054-MS. Society of Petroleum Engineers
(SPE), United States.

Clinton, G.W., Ruiz, J., 1968. Performance of Payoa Basal Eocene Block A Reservoir. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 20 (1), SPE-1909-PA. Society of
Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States. Page(s) 31-35

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 56 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Cooper, M.A., Addison, F.T., Alvarez, R., Coral, M., Graham, R.H., Hayward, A.B., Howe, S., Martinez, J.F., Naar, J., Penas, R., Pulham, A.J., Taborda, A.,
1995. Basin development and tectonic history of the Llanos Basin, Eastern Cordillera, and middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia. Bulletin American Association
of Petroleum Geologists, 79 (10). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1421-1443

Cordoba, F., Rolon, F.L., Buchelli, F., Suarez, M.I., 2000. Provincia petrolifera del Valle Medio del Magdalena, Colombia. VII Simposio Bolivariano;
Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas. Page(s) 603-609

Cordoba Ortiz, F., 1998. Petroleum Systems of the Neiva Sub-basin, Upper Magdalena Basin, Colombia. Master Thesis. Universidade Federal do Rio de
Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro. Page(s) 1-344

Corredor, F.O., 1996. Three-dimensional geometry and kinematics of the western thrust front of the eastern Corillera, Colombia. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists Annual Convention; Paper Abstracts, 5. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 29-30

Corrigan, H.T., 1967. Geology of the Upper Magdalena Basin (Northern Portion). Geological Field-Trips Colombia, 1959-1978.

Cuadros, J., Cuadros, G., 2010. Optimal well placement improves heavy oil production (Girasol Fld, Colombia). E&P (April 2010). Hart Energy Publication.

Cuadros, J., Salamanca, A., Amado, N.R., Cuadros, G., Rojas, E., 2012. Horizontal Well Placement for Heavy Oil Production in Colombia. SPE Heavy Oil
Conference 12-14 June 2012, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, SPE-157926-MS. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States. Page(s) 1-13

Davis, C.L., 1995. Geochemical and carbon-isotopic stratigraphy of Cretaceous marine sediments in a core from the Maracaibo Basin, western Venezuela.
Master's Thesis, University of Indiana, Bloomington, USA. Page(s) 1-115

De Porta, J., 1962. Consideraciones sobre el estado actual de la estratigrafia del Terciario en Colombia. Boletin de Geologia (Bucaramanga). Universidad
Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Page(s) 5-43

De Porta, J., 1966. Geologia del extremo sur del Valle del Magdalena Medio entre Honda y Guatiqui, Colombia. Boletin de Geologia (Bucaramanga).
Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Page(s) 1-347

De Porta, J., 1965. La estratigrafia del Cretacico Superior y Terciario en el extremo sur del Valle Medio del Magdalena. Boletin de Geologia (Bucaramanga),
19. Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.

Dengo, C.A., Covey, M.C., 1993. Structure of the Eastern Cordillera of Colombia; implication for trap styles and regional tectonics. Bulletin American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (8). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1315-1337

Dickey, P.A., 1992. La Cira-Infantas field - Colombia; Middle Magdalena Basin. Structural Traps; VII, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Treatise of
Petroleum Geology, Atlas of Oil and Gas Fields, A-25. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 323-347

Disalvo, A., Inigo, J., Apreda, D., Iribarne, M., 2013. Hydrocarbon Prospectivity of Intermontane Basins in the Andean Orogen. AAPG International Conference
& Exhibition, Cartagena, Colombia, 8-11 September 2013.

Drozd, R.J., Piggott, N., 1996. The geochemistry of the Cusiana field oils. In: Mello, M.R., Trindade, L.A.F., Hessel, M.H.R. (ed), 4th Latin American Congress
on Organic Geochemistry; Extended Abstracts. Latin American Association of Organic Geochemistry (ALAGO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Page(s) 58-64

Ecopetrol, 1998. Opportunities for Hydrocarbon Exploration & Production in Colombia. Ecopetrol Promotional Brochure. Ecopetrol.

Ecopetrol, 2000. Atlas of Sedimentary Basins and Petroleum Geology of Colombia. Empresa Colombiana de Petroleos-Ecopetrol.

Ecopetrol, 2000. Atlas de cuencas sedimentarias de Colombia y geologia del petroleo. Ecopetrol CD ROM. Ecopetrol.

Ecopetrol, 2000. Ronda 2000, Yarigui-Cantagallo Area.

Ehrlich, R.N., Moldovanyi, E.P., Nederbragt, A.J., 1993. Drowning of the Late Albian Maraca Formation carbonate platform, Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists 1993 Annual Convention. American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic
Paleontologists. Page(s) 96

Erlich, R.N., Macsotay, O., Hall, S., Yeidling, C., Nederbragt, A.J., Pocknall, D.T., Steinbis, M.T., Giraldo, C., 1996. Paleogeography of the Late Cretaceous of
western Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1288

Escandon, M., Vallejos, C., Gambino, F., Pratt, L., 1993. Variations in organic facies and sedimentary environments of the La Luna Formation and Machiques
Member in the Perija Mountain Range, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin
American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 317

Escobar-Remolina, J.C.M., Barrios-Ortiz, W., Mantilla, J., Wegman, J., Davidson, B.C., 2014. An Effective Accelerated Pulsing Injection Method for Restoring
Injectivity in Waterflood Fields with Selective Injection Systems with Side-Pocket Mandrels and Control Flow Valves. SPE Western North America and Rocky
Mountain Joint Meeting, 17-18 April, Denver, CO, SPE-169544-MS. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Etayo-Serna, F., Rodriguez, G.I., 1985. Edad de la Formacion Los Santos. In: Etayo-Serna, F., Laverde, M.F. (ed), Proyecto Cretacico, Publicaciones
Geologicas Especiales del INGEOMINAS 16. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geologico-Mineras (INGEOMINAS). Page(s) XXVI1-XXVI6

Etayo-Serna, F., Renzoni, G., Barrero, D., 1976. Contornos sucesivos del mar Cretaceo en Colombia. Memoria Congreso Colombiano de Geologia, 1.
Page(s) 217-252

Eva, A.N., Burke, K., Mann, P., Wadge, G., 1989. Four-phase tectonostratigraphic development of the southern Caribbean. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 6.
Elsevier, International. Page(s) 9-21

Everett, J.R., Staskowski, R.J., Amos, J.F., Dripps, W.R., 1997. Falcon Basin, Venezuela, an underexploited hydrocarbon province. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists 1997 Annual Convention (Dallas, TX, April 6-9, 1997), Annual Meeting Abstracts - American Association of Petroleum Geologists and
Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, 6, AAPG Search and Discovery Article #91021. American Association of Petroleum Geologists,
Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists. Page(s) 34

Fabre, A., 1985. Dinamica de la sedimentacion Cretacica en la region de la Sierra Nevada del Cocuy (Cordillera Oriental de Colombia) (Dynamics of
Cretaceous sedimentation in the Sierra Nevada del Cocuy region; Eastern Cordillera of Colombia). In: Etayo-Serna, F., Laverde, M.F. (ed), Proyecto
Cretacico (Cretaceous Project), Proyecto Cretacico, Publicaciones Geologicas Especiales del INGEOMINAS 16. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones
Geologico-Mineras (INGEOMINAS). Page(s) 19.1-19.20

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 57 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Feininger, T., 1970. The Palestina Fault, Colombia. Bulletin Geological Society of America, 81. Geological Society of America (GSA), Boulder, CO, United
States. Page(s) 1201-1216

Galea Alvarez, F.A., Somoza, D., Callejon, A.F., Morales, M.F., 1995. Stratigraphy, geochemistry and structural aspects of western Apure, Colombia-
Venezuela border. Geological Society of America, 1995 Annual Meeting, Abstracts with Program - Geological Society of America, 27 (6). Geological Society of
America (GSA), Boulder, CO, United States. Page(s) 177

Galea Alvarez, F., Sliter, W.V., 1996. Late Cretaceous biostratigraphy of the La Luna Formation, Maracaibo Basin. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1341

Gallo, J., 1977. The environmental facies analysis of selected Tertiary and Cretaceous outcrops along the Villeta-Honda road. 17th Field Annual Conference,
Colombian Society of Petroleum Geologists and Geophysicists. Colombian Society of Petroleum Geologists and Geophysicists, Bogota, Colombia. Page(s)
471-487

Garavito, F., Trudgill, B., Kluth, C., 2010. Structural inversion and exploration implications in the Cagüi sector, northern Middle Magdalena Valley Basin,
Colombia. AAPG 2010 Annual Convention & Exhibition, 11-14 April, 2010, New Orleans, Louisiana, Search and Discover Article #90104. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States.

Garcia, D., Parra, P., Sanchez, C., 2001. Modelos de generacion de petroleo en el Valle Medio del Rio Magdalena, Informe Interno Ecopetrol-ICP.
Piedecuesta, 166 p, 5 Anexos.

Garcia, D., Parra, P., 2003. Areas con mayor potencial de carga de petroleo: Cuenca Valle Medio del Magdalena y occidente de la Cordillera Oriental,
Colombia. Memorias VIII Simposio Bolivariano: Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas, Volumenes I and II, Cartagena de Indias, Septiembre 21-
24, 2003, Unraveling the Potential. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 253-263

Garner, A.H., 1926. Suggested nomenclature and correlation of the geological formations in Venezuela. Transactions Institution of Mining and Metallurgy.
Page(s) 680

Gil, E., Rotundo, J., Hernandez, L., 1993. Prospectivity of northern Barinas area through modern seismic data. American Association of Petroleum Geologists
International Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2). American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 321

Gomez, E., Jordan, T.E., Allmendinger, R.W., Hegarty, K., Kelley, S., Heizler, M., 2003. Controls on architecture of the Late Cretaceous to Cenozoic southern
Middle Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia. GSA Bulletin, 115 (2). Geological Society of America (GSA). Page(s) 131-147

Gomez, E., 2001. Tectonic Controls on the Late Cretaceous to Cenozoic Sedimentary Fill of the Middle Magdalena Valley Basin, Eastern Cordillera and
Llanos Basin, Colombia. PhD dissertation. Page(s) 1-649

Gomez, E., Jordan, T., 1998. Relative timing of Cenozoic deformation of the middle Magdalena Valley basin and bounding mountain ranges, Colombia.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists Annual Meeting Expanded Abstracts, 30 (7). American Assoc. of Petrol. Geol. & Soc. of Economic Paleontol. &
Mineral., Tulsa, OK, United States.

Gomez, E., Jordan, T., Kelley, S., Heizler, M., 1999. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic basin architecture of the southernmost Middle Magdalena Valley,
Colombia: Multiple constraints on syndeformational sedimentation. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1999 Annual Meeting (San Antonio, TX,
April 11-14, 1999), Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 83 (13, Supplement). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK,
United States. Page(s) A49

Guarnizo, E.L., Garcia, G.D., Losada, H., Amaya, M., Nunez, G., 2007. The Role of Alternative Formation Evaluation Technologies in Brownfield Revitalization
in Colombia. International Petroleum Technology Conference (IPTC), Dubai, 4–6 December 2007.

Gutierrez, M.A., 2001. Rock Physics and 3-D Seismic Characterization of Reservoir Heterogeneities to Improve Recovery Efficiency. P.H.D. Dissertation in
Geophysics, Stanford University. Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Harken, 1998. Harken announces Catalina 1 initial production test results. Harken News Release, February, 2. Page(s) 1

Harken, 1999. Harken's Laurel #1 Rosa Blanca log results are very favorable. Harken Press Release.

Harken, 1999. Harken announces La Luna Formation log results on Laurel #1 well. Harken Press Release.

Harken, 1996. Torcaz 2 production tests exceed expectations. Press Release, 26-Sep-1996. Page(s) 1-3

Hedberg, H.D., Sass, L.C., 1937. Synopsis de las formaciones geologicas de la parte occidental de la Cuenca de Maracaibo (Synopsis of the geological
formations of the occidental part of the Maracaibo Basin). Boletin Asociacion Venezolana de Geologia, Mineria y Petroleo, (Caracas), 1 (2-4). Asociacion
Venezolana de Geologia, Mineria y Petroleo, Caracas, Venezuela. Page(s) 77-120

Hedberg, H.D., 1931. Cretaceous limestones as petroleum source rocks in northwestern Venezuela. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists,
15 (3). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 229-244

Higuera, D., Pachano-Pelaez, K.L., Useche, J., Sur, S., 2012. Optimization of Cyclic Steam Stimulation in Highly Stratified Heavy Oil Reservoir of Middle
Magdalena Basin: Moriche Field (Colombia). SPE Oil and Gas India Conference and Exhibition, 28-30 March, Mumbai, India, SPE-153234-MS. Society of
Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Jacques, J.M., 2003. A tectonostratigraphic synthesis of the Sub-Andean basins: implications for the geotectonic segmentation of the Andean Belt. Journal
Geological Society of London, 160. Geological Society of London, London, United Kingdom. Page(s) 687-701

Jacquin, T., Azpiritxaga, I., Murat, B., Roberto, M.F., 1993. Sequential evolution of Lower Cretaceous carbonate platforms in the Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77
(2). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 326

Jaillard, E., Soler, P., Carlier, G., Mourier, T., 1990. Geodynamic evolution of the northern and central Andes during Early to Middle Mesozoic times: a Tethyan
model. Journal Geological Society of London, 147. Geological Society of London, London, United Kingdom. Page(s) 1009-1022

James, K.H., 1990. The Venezuelan hydrocarbon habitat. Geological Society of London Special Publications, 50. Geological Society of London, London,
United Kingdom. Page(s) 9-35

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 58 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Jimenez, M., Rojas, C., Valderrama, Y., 2015. Initial analysis of hidrocarbon potential in the Tablazo Formation; Center and Northern areas of Middle
Magdalena Valley, Colombia. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, 20-22 July 2015.

Jones, P.B., 1993. Gravity sliding, thrusting, and petroleum traps in the Magdalena basins and Cordillera Orientale, Colombia. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists International Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2). American Association
of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 327

Jones, P.B., 1995. Geodynamic evolution of the eastern Andes, Colombia; an alternative hypothesis. In: Tankard, A.J., Suarez, S., Welsink, H.J. (ed),
Petroleum Basins of South America, Memoir American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 62. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK,
United States. Page(s) 647-658

Juliao, T.M., Marquez, R., Zamora, W.H., Perez Carrillo, E.R., 2013. Detailed organic geochemical characterization from Cretaceous sequence: Potential
Unconventional Reservoirs - Shale Gas/Shale Oil, In the Middle Magdalena Valley Basin (MMV), Colombia. AAPG International Conference & Exhibition,
Cartagena, Colombia, 8-11 September 2013, Search and Discovery Article #90166.

Juliao, T.M., Carvalho, M.D., Cruz, S., Marquez, R.E., 2012. Paleoenvironmental reconstruction based on palynofacies analyses of La Luna Formation (Upper
Cretaceous), Middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia. 29th TSOP Annual Meeting & 64th ICCP Meeting, September 15 – 24, 2012, Beijing, China.

Julivert, M., 1958. Geologia de la zona tabular entre San Gil y Chiquinquira, Cordillera Oriental, Colombia. Boletin de Geologia (Bucaramanga), 2. Universidad
Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Page(s) 33-47

Katz, B.J., 1995. The role of geochemical correlations in establishing hydrocarbon origin and migration patterns. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, 1995 Annual Convention (Houston, TX, March 5-8, 1995), American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists
and Mineralogists, Annual Meeting Abstracts, 4. American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists & Mineralogists.
Page(s) 48

Kloppenburg, A., Alzate, J., Rodriguez, G., 2003. Building a Discrete Fracture Network Based on the Deformation History: A Case Study From the Guaduas
Field, Colombia. Memorias VIII Simposio Bolivariano: Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas, Volumenes I and II, Cartagena de Indias,
Septiembre 21-24, 2003, Unraveling the Potential. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP).

Kovas, E.J., Rodgers, D.A., Binger, S.H., 1982. Seismic interpretation of back thrusts and displacement transfer zones between en echelon thrust faults,
Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia. V Congreso Latinoamericano de Geologia, Buenos Aires. Page(s) 565-582

Langenheim, J.H., 1963. Late Paleozoic and Early Mesozoic plant fossils from the Cordillera Oriental of Colombia and correlation of the Giron Formation.
Boletin Geologico, Bogota, 8 (1-3). Page(s) 95-132

Lobo Alvarez, A., Moises, M.R., Hernandez, C.V., 1992. Importancia de la definicion de la arquitectura de las rocas almacenadoras en la evaluacion de los
procesos secundarios (Campo La Cira, area 07, zona C). Memorias 5(o) Congreso Colombiano del Petroleo. Page(s) 355-371

Lombard, M.S., Townsend, T., Ramirez, E., Zambrano, M., 2012. Field Trials Using an All Metal Ring Seal Floating Packer. SPE Western Regional Meeting,
Bakersfield, CA, Mar. 21-23, 2012, SPE-153839-MS. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Lopez, N., Perez-damas, C.E., Ye, H., Patarroyo, M., 2011. Innovative Well-Completion Strategy for Challenging Heavy-Oil Wells within Mature Fields
Requiring Sand Control in Colombia. SPE Heavy Oil Conference and Exhibition, 12-14 December 2011, Kuwait City, Kuwait, SPE-149966-MS. Society of
Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Lorente, M.A., Duran, I., Ruiz, M., 1996. Late Cretaceous in western Venezuela; a new biostratigraphical approach. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1309-1310

Lugo, J., Mann, P., 1995. Jurassic-Eocene tectonic evolution of Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. In: Tankard, A.J., Suarez, S., Welsink, H.J. (ed), Petroleum
Basins of South America, Memoir American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 62. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United
States. Page(s) 699-725

Macellari, C.E., De Vries, T.J., 1987. Late Cretaceous upwelling and anoxic sedimentation in northwestern South America. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 59 (4). Elsevier, International.

Manske, M.C., 1996. Tectonothermal modeling of hydrocarbon maturation, central Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1310-1311

Mantilla, I., Quintero, P., 2000. Comprehensive System for Treatment and Injection of Produced Water: Field Case (Yarigui-Cantagallo). Oct-2000.

Marcano, F., Leonard, C., Dominguez, C., Cassani, F., 1996. 2-D modeling of generation, migration, oil mixture and biodegradation in Ceuta, south-east of the
Maracaibo Basin. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1311

Marcano, F., Padron, S., 1993. Thermal modeling in Ceuta, Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International
Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK,
United States. Page(s) 332

Marcano, F., Boesi, T., Pierela, B., Alcala, L., Violino, R., 1996. Petroleum system of the south-eastern portion of the Maracaibo Basin; Ceuta North Andean
flank. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1311

Marquez, L., Elphick, J., Peralta, J., Amaya, M., Lozano, E., 2009. Casabe Mature Field Revitalization Through an Alliance: A Case Study of Multicompany
and Multidiscipline Integration. SPE 2009 Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Cartagena, Colombia, 31 May-03 June 2009,
122874. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States. Page(s) 1-12

Martinez, M.A., Mora, A., Lelijveld, J., 2013. Thermal evolution of potential Cretaceous and Tertiary source rocks across the MMVB, the southern portion of the
Eastern Cordillera, and Llanos Basin Foothills, Colombia. AAPG International Conference & Exhibition, Cartagena, Colombia, 8-11 September 2013, Search
and Discovery Article #90166. Page(s) 1

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 59 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Martinez, H., Jaramillo, J.M., 2016. Magnetic and radiometric signatures in soils above hidrocarbon accumulations. Toqui-Toqui and Mana Fields, Tolima,
Colombia. Memorias del XII Simposio Bolivariano. Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del
Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 1-23

Maslanyj, M.P., Pena, L.E., 1994. Colombia; 3, Upper Magdalena Valley Basin in Colombia has new play potential. Oil and Gas Journal, 92 (22). Pennwell,
Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 93-96

Maxus, 1994. Stratigraphic and tectonic study of the Upper and Middle Magdalena basins, Colombia. Maxus Petroleum Internal Report.

May, M., Brinton, L., McKamey, K., Lara, A., 2009. Interpretation and Modeling of Structurally Complex Eocene La Paz and Oligocene Mugrosa Fluvial
Sandstone Reservoirs, Yarigui-Cantagallo Field, Middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia, SA. AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, 15-18 November
2009, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States.

McGettigan, C.K., Hunt, D.G., 1996. Colombia's oil and gas future: Colombia continues to yield major oil, gas discoveries. Oil and Gas Journal, 94 (29).
Pennwell, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 40-45

Medina, A., Rueda, M., Suarez, M.I., 1992. Evaluacion del potencial de entrampamiento estructural en el Terciario al noroeste del Rio Sogamoso, Cuenca
Valle Medio del Magdalena. Internal Report. Page(s) 1-36

Mejia, J.M.J., Lequerica, S.R., Gonzalez, C.G., Pradilla, G.R., Caro, N.B., 2014. Bitumen deposits in Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia, South America.
AAPG International Conference & Exhibition, Istanbul, Turkey, 14-17 September 2014, Search and Discovery Article #51051. Page(s) 1-2

Mello, M.R., Trindade, L.A.F., 1994. Perspectivas exploratorias na America do Sul baseada em dados geoquimicos. 5(o) Congresso Brasileiro de Petroleo e
Conexpo ARPEL 94, TT-173. Page(s) 1-11

Mello, M.R., Trindade, L.A.F., Rangel, A.V.O., Escandon, M., Gallango, O., Rosso, M.R., Didyk, B., Guzman Vega, M., 1994. Comparative geochemical
characterization of Latin American oils derived from Devonian to Miocene source rocks: A biological marker and isotope approach. In: Mello, M.R., Trindade,
L.A.F., Hessel, M.H.R. (ed), 4th Latin American Congress on Organic Geochemistry; Extended Abstracts. Latin American Association of Organic
Geochemistry (ALAGO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Page(s) 109-112

Mendez, J., 1990. La Formacion La Luna: caracteristicas de una cuenca anoxica e una plataforma de aguas someras. 7th Venezuelan Geological Congress,
Caracas, Venezuela. Page(s) 852-866

Mendoza, F.A., 1988. Colombian exploration proceeding at swift pace. World Oil, 207 (3). IRM, Inc., Houston, TX, United States. Page(s) 78-79, 81

Mendoza, F., 1985. Colombia uses water to wake an old, tired giant. World Oil, 204 (1). IRM, Inc., Houston, TX, United States. Page(s) 95-100

Mojica, G.P.E., Zambrano, O.F., 1985. Depositos fosfaticos de Colombia (Phosphate deposits of Colombia). In: Ricaldi, V., Escalera, S.J. (ed), Los Depositos
Fosfaticos de Sud America (Phosphate Deposits of South America). Asociacion Geociencia Desarrollo Int., Cochabamba. Page(s) 89-128

Mojica, J., Franco, R., 1990. Estructura y evolucion tectonica del Valle Medio y Superior del Magdalena, Colombia. Geologia Colombiana, 17. Universidad
Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia. Page(s) 41-64

Mompart, L.E., Lee, C., 1995. Petroleum systems of the western Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1995 Annual
Convention (Houston, TX, March 5-8, 1995), American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists,
Annual Meeting Abstracts, 4. American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists & Mineralogists. Page(s) 110

Mongenot, T., Tribovillard, N.P., Desprairies, A., Lallier Verges, E., Laggoun-Defarge, F., 1996. Trace elements as palaeoenvironmental markers in strongly
mature hydrocarbon source rocks; the Cretaceous La Luna Formation of Venezuela. Sedimentary Geology, 103 (1-2). Elsevier, International. Page(s) 23-37

Montes, A.B., Caro Gonzalez, L.D., Mendonca Filho, J.G., 2018. Hydrocarbon generation potential, from the La Luna and Umir formations of Upper
Cretaceous of Middle Magdalena Basine in Colombia. 35th TSOP Annual Meeting, Beijing, 2018. The Society for Organic Petrology (TSOP). Page(s) 91-93

Montgomery, S., 1992. Petroleum potential of Upper and Middle Magdalena Basins, Colombia, Part 2: Plate tectonics, reservoirs, source rocks and field
histories. Petroleum Frontiers, 9 (3). Petroleum Information Corporation, Denver, CO, United States. Page(s) 1-67

Mora, C., 2000. Evaluacion del potencial de los sistemas petroliferos en las cuencas Cretacicas con produccion comercial en Colombia (Putumayo, Valle
Superior del Magdalena, Valle Medio del Magdalena, Catatumbo, y Llanos Orientales). MSc Thesis, Universidad Federal de Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro,
Brazil. Page(s) 1-177

Mora, C., Cordoba, F., Luna, O., Sarmiento, L.F., Rangel, A., Giraldo, B.N., Bartels, H.M., Reyes, J.P., Magoon, L.B., 1996. Petroleum system of the Middle
Magdalena Valley, Colombia. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association
of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1316

Mora, C., 2000. Evaluacion del potencial de los sistemas petroliferos en las cuencas Cretacicas con produccion comercial en Colombia (Evaluation of
petroleum systems potential in the Colombian Cretaceous basins with commercial production). Ecopetrol Internal Report. Page(s) 1-176

Mora, A.R., Rodriguez, Carlos Andres, Pinilla, Jenny, Quiroga, Elizabeth, Cardozo, Manuel, 2016. Developing challenging horizontal wells for a Colombian
waterflood field. Memorias del XII Simposio Bolivariano. Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos
del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 1-8

Morales, P., Rueda, M., 1986. Colombia stratigraphic correlation chart. Internal Report, Esso Colombiana Lt., Bogota, Colombia, Unpublished.

Morales, L.G., 1958. General geology and oil occurrences of Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia. In: Weeks, L.G. (ed), Habitat of Oil, American Association
of Petroleum Geologists Symposium. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 641-695

Munoz, N.G., Mompart, L., Talukdar, S.C., 1995. Application of oil gas-chromatography in reservoir compartmentalization in a mature Venezuelan oil field.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1995 Annual Convention (Houston, TX, March 5-8, 1995), American Association of Petroleum Geologists and
Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Annual Meeting Abstracts, 4. American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic
Paleontologists & Mineralogists. Page(s) 69

Murat, B., Azpiritxaga, I., 1993. Application of sequence stratigraphy to reservoir and hydrocarbon source rock prediction in the Cretaceous carbonate
platforms of Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 336

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 60 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Navarro, A., Diaz, F., Rodriguez, I., 1996. Petroleum system of the Barua and Motatan fields and the San Pedro-Machango area. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association
of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1317

Navas, G.J., 1963. Estudio estratigrafico del Giron al oeste del macizo de Santander (Cordillera Oriental, Colombia). Boletin de Geologia (Bucaramanga), 12.
Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Page(s) 19-33

Notestein, F.B., Hubman, C.W., Bowler, J.W., 1944. Geology of the Barco Concession, Republic of Colombia, South America. Bulletin Geological Society of
America, 55 (10). Geological Society of America (GSA), Boulder, CO, United States. Page(s) 1165-1216

Olaya, I.D., Ramon, J.C., 1988. Evaluacion del potencial hidrocarburifero de las Subcuencas Chimare y Portete en la Alta Guajira. Tesis de Grado,
Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga. Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Page(s) 1-122

Osorio, G., 2008. Heavy oil and mature oil fields development in Colombia. Global Petroleum Show, Calgary, Canada, June 2008.

Parke, A.D., 1991. Development of the La Cira-Infantas field, Colombia. 4(o) Simposio Bolivariano Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas,
Memorias Asociacion Colombian de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Trabajo, 24. Page(s) 47

Parnaud, F., Gou, Y., Pascual, J.C., Capello, M.A., Truskowski, I., Passalacqua, H., 1995. Stratigraphic synthesis of Western Venezuela. In: Tankard, A.J.,
Suarez, S., Welsink, H.J. (ed), Petroleum Basins of South America, Memoir American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 62. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 681-698

Passalacqua, H., Gallango, O., Capello, M.A., De Toni, B., Tocco, R., Loureiro, D., 1996. Petroleum systems of western Venezuela. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association
of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1321

Patarroyo, M., Carvajal, G., Milena, Q., Urdaneta, J., Pacheco, J., 2014. New Art of Building Horizontal and Highly Deviated Wells Help Maximize Recovery
and Production from Heavy Oil Fields in Colombia. SPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada, 10-12 June 2014, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, SPE-170009-MS.
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States. Page(s) 1-13

Peralta-Vargas, J., Cortes, G., Gambaretto, W., Martinez-Uribe, L., 2009. Finding bypassed oil in a mature field - Casabe Field, Middle Magdalene Valley
Basin, Colombia. X Simposio Bolivariano Exploracion Petrolera en Cuencas Subandinas, Cartagena, Colombia, July 2009. Asociacion Colombiana de
Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 1-6

Perez, L.E., Gonzalez-Mosquera, J.G., Gomez-Ramirez, V., Lozano, E., Vargas-Medina, J.A., 2007. Integrated Reservoir Management Enhances the
Recovery in a Mature Field (Yarigui-Cantagallo). SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 15-18 April,Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Perez, I.J., Farrimond, P., Furrer, M., 1996. Global and local controls influencing the deposition of the La Luna Formation (Cenomanian-Campanian), western
Venezuela. Chemical Geology, 130 (3-4). Elsevier, International. Page(s) 271-288

Perez-Tellez, G., 1995. La Luna Formation of Colombia: lithofacies, organic facies and generation capacity. Memorias 6(o) Congreso Colombiano del
Petroleo, 1. Page(s) 135-144

Pilsbry, H.A., Olsson, A.A., 1935. Tertiary fresh water mollusks of the Magdalena Embayment. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Science of
Philadelphia, 87. Page(s) 7-20

Pindell, J.L., 1991. Geologic rationale for hydrocarbon exploration in the Caribbean and adjacent regions. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 14 (3). Scientific
Press Ltd., Beaconsfield, United Kingdom. Page(s) 237-257

Pindell, J.L., 1997. Tectonic evolution and stratigraphic development of Northern South America. 6(o) Simposio Bolivariano Exploracion Petrolera en las
Cuencas Subandinas, 2. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP).

Pindell, J.L., Kennan, L., Barrett, S.F., 2000. Putting it all together again. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Explorer, 21 (10). American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States. Page(s) 58-62

Pinzon, J.A., 1988. Operaciones de explotacion de crudos pesados en el Valle del Medio Magdalena evaluacion de la inyeccion ciclica de vapor. 3er
Congreso Colombiano del Petroleo.

Prada-Mejia, J.A., Osorio-Suarez, J.P., Camacho-Navarro, J., 2014. Optimizing Waterflooding Process for Recovery Using Nonlinear Model Predictive
Control: Case Yarigui-Cantagallo. SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 21-23 May 2014, Maracaibo, Venezuela, SPE-
169369-MS. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Pratt, L., Mompart, L., Murat, B., 1993. Hydrocarbon generation potential of the Cretaceous section from Well ALP-6, Perija region, Venezuela. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists International Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2).
American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 341

Pratt, L.M., Davis, C., Mompart, L., Murat, B., 1994. Carbon isotopic stratigraphy of Cretaceous marine strata in Venezuela. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists Annual Convention, Annual Meeting Abstracts - American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists
and Mineralogists, (1994). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists. Page(s) 238

Prieto, M.E., Mantilla, J., Owens, B.K., Lobo, A., Fernandez, F., 2009. Redevelopment Progress for Colombia's La Cira-Infantas Field. SPE 2009 Latin
American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Cartagena, Colombia, 31 May-03 June 2009, SPE-120794. Society of Petroleum Engineers
(SPE), United States.

Prince, M., Caceres, C., Rodriguez, M., Sanchez, C., Murillo, M., Dand, Enachescu M., 2016. Acordionero oil field discovery, Middle Magdalena Basin,
Colombia: An unusual large stratigraphic trap within the Paleocene Lisama Formation. Memorias del XII Simposio Bolivariano. Exploracion Petrolera en las
Cuencas Subandinas. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 1-19

Prince, M., Acevedo, R., Sanchez, C., Rojas, D., 2010. Upper Cretaceous in the Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia, South America: A new exploration target
in an old mature basin. AAPG International Conference & Exhibition, September 12-15, 2010, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, Search & Discovery Article #10296.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States.

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 61 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Pulido, G.O., 1980. Geologia de las planchas 135 San Gil y 151 Charala departamento de Santander (Geology of sheets 135 San Gil and 151 Charala;
Santander). Boletin Geologico INGEOMINAS, 23 (2). Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Geologico-Mineras (INGEOMINAS). Page(s) 39-78

Raedeke, L.D., 1993. Source rocks of the sub-Andean basins. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Congress and Exhibition,
Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s)
342

Ramirez, E., 1988. Stratigraphy of the Tertiary of the Middle Magdalena Basin (Colombia), central and northern parts. Master's Thesis. The University of
Texas, Austin, Texas, U.S.A.. Page(s) 1-118

Ramirez, L.J., Abril, W.R., Vargas, L., Trivino, C.A., 2007. Saving Energy in Heavy-Oil Fields in Colombia with Progressive Cavity Pumps. Latin America &
Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, April 2007, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Ramon, J.C., Dzou, L., 1996. Evaluacion geoquimica de roca fuente y crudos en la Cordillera Oriental, Colombia: implicaciones sobre el modelo de evolucion
geologica (Geochemical evaluation of source rock and crude oil in the Eastern Cordillera, Colombia: implications on geological evolution models). American
Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8).
American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1327

Ramon, J.C., Dzou, L., Giraldo, B.N., 1997. Geochemical evaluation of the Middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia. CT & F Ciencia, Tecnologia y Futuro, v. 1.3.
Page(s) 47-66

Ramon, J.C., Dzou, L., 1999. Petroleum geochemistry of the Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia. Organic Geochemistry, 30. Elsevier, International. Page(s)
249-266

Ramos, H., Puerta, M., Sachica, J.A., Chapparo, C.H., 2013. Multidisciplinary Approach, Key Factor in the Development of Complex Stratigraphic Fields, Case
Study: Llanito Field. AAPG International Conference & Exhibition, Cartagena, Colombia, 8-11 September 2013.

Ramos, H., Puerta, M., Sachica, J.A., Chaparro, C.H., 2013. Multidisciplinary approach, key factor in the development of complex stratigraphic fields in
Colombia, case study: Llanito Field. AAPG International Conference & Exhibition, Cartagena, Colombia, 8-11 September 2013, Search and Discovery Article
#20212. Page(s) 1-44

Rangel, A., Moldowan, J.M., Nino, C., Parra, P., Giraldo, B.N., 2002. Umir Formation: Organic geochemical and stratigraphic assessment as cosource for
Middle Magdalena basin oil, Colombia. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 86 (12). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa,
OK, United States. Page(s) 2069-2087

Rangel, A., Garcia, D., Mora, C., Suarez, M.I., 2003. Evaluacion de los procesos de biodegradacion en la cuenca Valle Medio del Magdalena. Memorias VIII
Simposio Bolivariano: Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas, Volumenes I and II, Cartagena de Indias, Septiembre 21-24, 2003, Unraveling the
Potential. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 296-303

Rangel, A., Parra, P., Nino, C., 2000. The La Luna Formation: chemostratigraphy and organic facies in the Middle Magdalena Basin. Organic Geochemistry,
31 (12). Elsevier, International. Page(s) 1267-1284

Reuters, 1999. IFC loans Harken $55M for Colombia oil project. Lasmo Press Release.

Reyes, J.P., Jajardo, A., Mantilla, M., Barragan, M., 2000. Secuencia calcarea del Cretaceo del Valle Medio del Magdalena, Colombia: una nueva frontera
exploratoria. VII Simposio Bolivariano; Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas. Page(s) 426-442

Reyes-Harker, A., Sandoval, J.E., Castellanos, G., 1992. Geologia de produccion Campo Casabe. Memorias 5(o) Congreso Colombiano del Petroleo. Page(s)
1-8

Rodriguez, E., Orjuela, J., 2004. Feasibility to Apply the Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) Technique in the Country's Heavy Crude-Oil Fields
(Colombia). CT & F Ciencia, Tecnologia Futuro, 2 (5). Instituto Colombiano del Petroleo (ICP).

Rodriguez, C.G., Baez, H.A., 1985. Cuencas sedimentarias de Colombia. II Simposio Bolivariano, Bogota, August. Page(s) 1-93

Rodriguez, M., Caceres, C., Prince, M., Monroy, C., Daza, D., Murillo, D., 2016. An approximation to the understanding of natural fractured reservoirs in La
Luna Formation: a study case of from the northern Middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia. Memorias del XII Simposio Bolivariano. Exploracion Petrolera en las
Cuencas Subandinas. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 1-8

Rojas, E., Velasco, J., Salamanca, A., Romero, D., Leguizamon, A., 2013. Horizontal Well Placement in Thin Shallow Sands for Heavy Oil Fields
Development. Second EAGE Workshop on Geosteering & Well Placement, Sept. 2013
Field Development & Planning. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers (EAGE), International.

Rojas, P., 2005. Revision y Analisis de los Problemas de Producccion de Arena en los Pozos del Campo Palagua. Thesis: Universidad Industrial de
Santander, Escuela de Ingenieria Petroleros. Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Page(s) 1-148

Rolon, F.L., Toro, J., 2003. Role of extensional structures in the development of the Middle Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia. Memorias VIII Simposio
Bolivariano: Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas, Volumenes I and II, Cartagena de Indias, Septiembre 21-24, 2003, Unraveling the Potential.
Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 161-167

Rolon, F.L., Lorenzo, J.M., Lowrie, A., Barrero, D., 2001. Thrust, kinematics and hydrocarbon migration in the Middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia, South
America. GCSSEPM Foundation 21st Annual Bob F. Perkins Research Conference: Petroleum Systems of Deep-Water Basins: Global and Gulf of Mexico
Experience, Houston, Texas, December 2-5. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies, New Orleans, LA, United States. Page(s) 523

Sanchez, C.J., Teson, E., Horton, B.K., Mora Bohorquez, A.R., Ketcham, R.A., Stockli, D.F., Moreno, N.R., 2011. Influence of the Eastern Cordillera
exhumation on the structural evolution of the eastern part of Middle Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia. 2011 AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition,
Houston, Texas, USA, April 10-13, 2011, Search and Discovery Article #40800. Page(s) 1-37

Sarmiento, L.F., 2011. Middle Magdalena Basin. In: Cediel, F., Colmenares, F. (ed), Petroleum Geology of Colombia, 11. ANH Agencia Nacional de
Hidrocarburos, Bogota, Colombia. Page(s) 1-193

Schamel, S., 1991. Middle and Upper Magdalena Basins, Colombia. Memoir American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 52. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 283-301

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 62 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Schamel, S., 1992. Petroleum potential of Upper and Middle Magdalena Basins, Colombia, Part 1: Local and regional geology. Petroleum Frontiers, 9 (2).
Petroleum Information Corporation, Denver, CO, United States. Page(s) 93-167

Schamel, S., Richardson, A., Carlos, A.A.P., 1996. Timing of hydrocarbon maturation and trap formation in the Cordillera Oriental and adjacent petroleum
provinces of Colombia. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1334

Schamel, S., 1991. Middle and Upper Magdalena Basins, Colombia. In: Biddle, K.T. (ed), Active Margin Basins, Memoir American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, 52, Chapter 10. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 283-301

Scherer, W., 1995. Hydrocarbon families in the Maracaibo Basin, western Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 1995 Annual Convention
(Houston, TX, March 5-8, 1995), American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Annual Meeting
Abstracts, 4. American Association of Petroleum Geologists and Society of Economic Paleontologists & Mineralogists. Page(s) 85

Shirley, K., 1998. Independents making big finds in oil, gas-rich South America. American Oil and Gas Reporter, 41 (5). Page(s) 51-52,55,57-58

Smith, J.E., 1956. Basement reservoir of La Paz-Mara oil fields, western Venezuela. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 40 (2). American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 380-385

Smith, J.E., 1951. The Cretaceous limestone producing areas of the Mara and Maracaibo district, Venezuela [with discussion]. Proceedings 3rd World
Petroleum Congress (Actes et Documents - 3eme Congres Mondial du Petrole), 3 (1). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, International. Page(s) 56-72

Spickert, A., 2014. Petroleum System Analysis: Middle Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia, South America. Master of Science Thesis, University of
Washington. University of Washington. Page(s) 1-53

Steininger, 2000. Colombia oil field developments make progress. Oil and Gas Journal, 98 (23). Pennwell, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 33

Steuer, M.R., Bentham, P.A., Latimer, G.H., 1997. Structural style and emplacement of the Opon Anticline, Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia. 6(o) Simposio
Bolivariano Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas, 2. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo, Bogota, Colombia
(ACGGP). Page(s) 257-262

Stone, D.M., Elliott, R., Latimer, G., Steuer, M., 1996. Opon gas renews interest in the hydrocarbon prolific Middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8).
American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1338-1339

Stoufer, P.S., Scherer, W., 1996. Organic carbon and phosphate distributions in the La Luna Formation, western Venezuela. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association
of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1339

Suarez, M.I., 1996. Facies analysis of the Upper Eocene La Paz Formation and regional evaluation of the post-Middle Eocene stratigraphy, northern Middle
Magdalena Valley Basin, Colombia. Master's Thesis. University of Colorado, Boulder, USA. Page(s) 1-88

Suarez, M.I., 1997. Tectonoestratigrafia del Terciario y potencial petrolifero de la Formacion La Paz, Cuenca del Valle Medio del Magdalena Paret norte,
Colombia. 6(o) Simposio Bolivariano Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas, 2. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo,
Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 95-98

Sutton, F.A., 1946. Geology of Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 30 (10). American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1621-1741

Sweeney, J.J., Braun, R.L., Burnham, A.K., Talukdar, S., Vallejos, C., 1995. Chemical kinetic model of hydrocarbon generation, expulsion and destruction
applied to the Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 79 (10). American Association of Petroleum Geologists,
Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1515-1532

Taborda, A.B., 1965. Guidebook to the geology of the De Mares concessions; field trip of February 26-28, 1965. Colombian Society of Petroleum Geologists
and Geophysicists. Page(s) 1-25

Talukdar, S.C., Luna, O., Ardila, J., Blake, R., 2000. Identification and revision of reservoir compartments in the Yarigui-Cantagallo oil field, Middle Magdalena
Valley, Colombia; integration of geochemical, geological and engineering data. Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 84 (9). American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1503

Talukdar, S.N., Marcano, F., 1994. Petroleum systems of the Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. In: Magoon, L.B., Dow, W.G. (ed), The Petroleum System - From
Source to Trap, Memoir American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 60. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s)
478-481

Talukdar, S.C., Marcano, F., 1993. Petroleum systems of the Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International
Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK,
United States. Page(s) 351

Tecnopetrol, 1997. Tecnopetrol's projects. Tecnopetrol Press Release. Page(s) 1-55

Tecnopetrol, 1997. Financials and project evaluation. Press Release. Tecnopetrol Inc..

Tecnopetrol, 1997. Tecnopetrol announces the acquisition of 60.92% of Petroleos del Norte. Tecnopetrol Press Release, 15 September 1997.

Tecnopetrol, 1997. Tecnopetrol announces exciting developments. Tecnopetrol Press Release, 20 June 1997.

Tecnopetrol, 1997. Tecnopetrol begins trading on the Canadian dealing network. Tecnopetrol Press Release, 10 July 1997.

Thompson-Butler, W., Peters, K.E., Magoon, L., Scheirer, A.H., Blanco, V.O., Graham, S.A., Gonzalez, R.E., 2017. Geochemically Distinct Oil Families in the
Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia Based on Chemometric Analysis of Source-Related Biomarker and Isotopic Ratios. AAPG 2017 Annual Convention &
Exhibition, Houston, Texas, April 2-5, 2017, Search and Discovery Article #90291. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States.

Tocco, R., Gallango, O., Parnaud, F., 1996. Geochemical modelling of the principal source rocks of the Barinas and Maracaibo basins, western Venezuela.
American Association of Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80
(8). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1340

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 63 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Tocco, R., Escobar, M., Ruggiero, A., Galarraga, F., 1995. Geochemistry of oil seeps and rock samples of the Early Tertiary section from the north Andean
flank of the Venezuelan Andes. Organic Geochemistry, 23 (4). Elsevier, International. Page(s) 311-327

Torres, E., Slatt, R.M., Philp, P., Brien, N.R.O., Rodriguez, H.L., 2015. Unconventional resources assessment of La Luna Formation in the Middle Magdalena
Valley Basin, Colombia. AAPG 2015 Annual Convention & Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, May 31-June 3, 2015, Search & Discovery Article #80469. American
Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1-15

Tovar-Cock, D., 2009. Seismic evidence of tectonic wedging in four Colombian basins: Case studies. Memorias X Simposio Bolivariano Exploracion Petrolera
Cuencas Subandinas, Cartagena, Colombia, July 26-29, 2009, CD-ROM. Page(s) 1-11

Trigos, E.M., Rueda, S.F., Rodriguez, E., 2012. Study of the Success Factors in Continuous Steam Injection: Field Case, Colombian Middle Magdalena Basin.
SPETT 2012 Energy Conference and Exhibition, Port of Spain, Trinidad, June 2012, SPE-158845-MS. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Trigos, E.M., Caro, A., Galeano-Barrera, D.F., Serna, A.J., Gomez, R., 2014. Evaluation of Infill Projects in Heavy-Oil Reservoir with Low Sand/Shale Relation:
Moriche Field (Colombia). SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 21-23 May 2014, Maracaibo, Venezuela. Society of
Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Truskowski, I.M., Galea, F.A., Sliter, W.V., 1995. Cenomanian hiatus in Venezuela. Geological Society of America Annual Meeting, Abstracts with Program -
Geological Society of America, 27 (6). Geological Society of America (GSA), Boulder, CO, United States. Page(s) A-303

U.S. Geological Survey, 1991. Energy-resource map of the Circum-Pacific region. Southeast Quadrant (Sheet 2 of 2). U.S. Geological Survey. Page(s) 1

Urbina, C., Cornelio, A., 1993. Structural style on southern flank of Merida Andes, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists International
Congress and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 77 (2). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK,
United States. Page(s) 352

USGS Magdalena Basins Assessment Team, 2017. Assessment of Continuous Oil and Gas Resources in the Middle and Upper Magdalena Basins,
Colombia, 2017. USGS. Page(s) 1-2

Vanegas, G., Lozano, E., Gomez, V., Gonzales, R., Montt, M., Santacruz, R., 2008. A multidisciplinary approach applied to a mature field re-development,
Llanito-Gala Field, Colombia. SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Rome, Italy, 9-12 June 2008, SPE-113309-MS. Page(s) 1-19

Velandia, J., Polo, Rosana Margarita, 2016. An Integrated reservoir analysis to characterize and produce economic oil from an oil-water transition zone.
Memorias del XII Simposio Bolivariano. Exploracion Petrolera en las Cuencas Subandinas. Asociacion Colombiana de Geologos y Geofisicos del Petroleo,
Bogota, Colombia (ACGGP). Page(s) 1-4

Villamil, T., 1999. Campanian-Miocene tectonostratigraphy, depocenter evolution and basin development of Colombia and western Venezuela.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 153 (1-4). Elsevier, International. Page(s) 239-275

Vrolijk, P.J., Pottorf, R.J., Maze, W.B., 1996. Overpressure history of fractures, west Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1344

Vrolijk, P.J., Pottorf, R.J., Maze, W.B., 1996. Record of source-generated overpressures, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Annual
Convention; Paper Abstracts, 5. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) A145

Ward, D.E., Goldsmith, R., Cruz, B., Restrepo, H., 1973. Geologia de los cuadrangulos H-12 Bucaramanga y H-13 Pamplona Departamento de Santander
(Geology of the Bucaramanga and Pamplona quadrangles, Santander Department). Boletin Geologico INGEOMINAS, 21 (1-3). Instituto Nacional de
Investigaciones Geologico-Mineras (INGEOMINAS). Page(s) 132

White, C., Mompart, L., 1996. Thermal history and timing of hydrocarbon expulsion in the Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. American Association of Petroleum
Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association of
Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1345

Willis, A., Ganguly, N., 2014. Unconventional oil potential in the Cretaceous shales of the Middle Magdalena Basin, Colombia. GeoConvention 2014, FOCUS -
Adapt, Refine, Sustain, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, May 12-16, 2014, Search and Discovery Article #90224. Page(s) 1-2

Zamarreno de Julivert, I., 1963. Estudio petrografico de las calizas de la formacion Rosablanca de la region de la mesa de los Santos. Boletin de Geologia
(Bucaramanga), 15. Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia. Page(s) 5-30

Zambrano, E., Melendiez, L., Ghosh, S., 1996. Paleogene turbidite system in the Maracaibo Basin; a new exploration frontier. American Association of
Petroleum Geologists International Conference and Exhibition, Abstracts, Bulletin American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 80 (8). American Association
of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States. Page(s) 1347-1348

Zapata, J., Ferneynes, H., 2001. A Novel Methodology to Reduce Formation Damage in Gravel Packed wells: Case study, Casabe Field, Colombia. SPE Latin
American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), United States.

Zhao, B., Zhang, G.S., Chen, S., Liu, Y., 2011. Sedimentary microfacies and remaining oil distribution of the Eocene Guaduas formation in Valasquez Oilfield,
Colombia. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology).

Zumberge, J., Cameron, N., 1995. Regional petroleum systems of the Maturin, Guarico, Barinas, Falcon and Maracaibo basins, Venezuela: petroleum
geochemistry and correlation. PESGB Venezuela Seminar. Scientific Societies Lecture Theatre, New Burlington Place, London. Page(s) 13-14
Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Image References

API Isogravity Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Basin Location Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Examples of Tertiary and Cretaceous Structural Play Types (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 64 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
IHS Markit | Middle Magdalena Basin Table of Contents

Field Location Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Geothermal Gradient Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Isopach Map of La Luna Formation (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Petroleum System Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Schematic Geological Evolution of the Northern Part of the Basin (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Stratigraphic Chart (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Structural Framework Map (Middle Magdalena Basin)

Typical Log (Middle Magdalena Basin)

WNW-ESE Regional Geological Cross-section B-B' (Middle Magdalena Basin)

WNW-SSE Regional Geological Cross-section A-A' (Middle Magdalena Basin)

WNW-SSE Regional Geological Cross-section C-C' (Middle Magdalena Basin)


Source: EDIN © 2022 IHS Markit

Confidential. © 2022 IHS Markit. All rights reserved. 03 January 2022


Terms of Use
 

IHS Markit Customer Care:


CustomerCare@ihsmarkit.com
Americas: +1 800 IHS CARE (+1 800 447 2273)
Europe, Middle East, and Africa: +44 (0) 1344 328 300
Asia and the Pacific Rim: +604 291 3600

Disclaimer
The information contained in this report is confidential. Any unauthorized use, disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination, in full or in part, in any media or by any means, without the
prior written permission of IHS Markit Ltd. or any of its affiliates ("IHS Markit") is strictly prohibited. IHS Markit owns all IHS Markit logos and trade names contained in this report that
are subject to license. Opinions, statements, estimates, and projections in this report (including other media) are solely those of the individual author(s) at the time of writing and do
not necessarily reflect the opinions of IHS Markit. Neither IHS Markit nor the author(s) has any obligation to update this report in the event that any content, opinion, statement,
estimate, or projection (collectively, "information") changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate. IHS Markit makes no warranty, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy,
completeness, or timeliness of any information in this report, and shall not in any way be liable to any recipient for any inaccuracies or omissions. Without limiting the foregoing,
IHS Markit shall have no liability whatsoever to any recipient, whether in contract, in tort (including negligence), under warranty, under statute or otherwise, in respect of any loss or
damage suffered by any recipient as a result of or in connection with any information provided, or any course of action determined, by it or any third party, whether or not based on
any information provided. The inclusion of a link to an external website by IHS Markit should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the site's owners (or their
products/services). IHS Markit is not responsible for either the content or output of external websites. Copyright © 2021, IHS MarkitTM.
All rights reserved and all intellectual property rights are retained by IHS Markit.
IHS Markit

You might also like