You are on page 1of 15

The 65th TEFLIN International Conference, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

12-14 July 2018

Design and Development of English Instructional Material Based on CAI


Model at Economics Faculty

Hastini

Tadulako University
Corresping email: tini_firhansyah@yahoo.com

Abstract
The method used in this study is Research and Development (R&D) with five design
phases. The research objective is designing English material and developing English
instructional material to increase students’ English proficiency at Economics faculty through
Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) model. The result of study shows that students' English
proficiency in accounting and management departments can be significantly increased by
applying CAI based material design with 86% of accounting students obtained 84%of the
total 95 students who took the test obtained a complete score with mean 80.92 or B+. The
total accounting department students were 28 who obtained score 75 was 27 students in
which 8 of them obtained equal and higher than score 86. The management students were 32
students who obtained score 75 was 29 students in which 11 of them obtained equal and
higher than score 86. Meanwhile, the development study students were 35 students who
obtained score 75 was 31 students in which 5 of them obtained equal and higher than score
86. This result of analysis is in line with the results of the students’ needs (wants) in English
learning by analyzing the students’ response on questionnaire, there were 79% of accounting
department students responded positively to the material application, 69% of management
students, and 71% of development study students. All categories are good to very good. It
isconcluded that CAI model based English instructional material could increase the students’
English proficiency at economics faculty.

Keywords : design, development, English, instructional, material

15
Hastini
Introduction sometimes students have good academic
Development of Information achievement and satisfy it actually has an
Computer and Technology (ICT)in this era emotional intelligence that is far from
of global communication gives available expectations. Students can easily master
information currently to wide society. It the science of management in accordance
contributes positively towards material with the field of expertise coupled with the
development even more interesting and presence of English language courses in
fun ideas. On other side, the existence of Non-English Department is very
ICT as new technology devices challenges promising will provide quality output.
the lecturers to master and use it for However, English Language
choosing and spending it effectively and materials for Non-English Language
efficiently in teaching and learning Department are full of abstract concepts
process.In this case, lecturer’s that are still difficult to be understood by
professionalism does not only cover learners, especially to develop skills in
pedagogical competence to teach students, English(Surjono & Susila, 2013, p. 55).
but also competence in organizing Therefore, in learning English subjects for
information and environment (including non-English majors should be more
place, method, media, assessment system, emphasized on functional skills. This
and facility) to facilitate students learning means that learning outcomes should be
activity for its ease and effectiveness. applicable in everyday life, both in the
Development of ICT also has possible context of the implementation of life in the
chance to use multimedia interactively in community and in the work environment.
form of learning multimedia. The use of Teaching and learning process is an
interactive multimedia has component of activity in which the process of students’
audio-visual to in teaching the learning learning and teaching in an interactive
material can attract students to learn the context and educational interaction
material. between lecturers and students, so there is
Interactive multimedia can also a change in the level of knowledge,
provide opportunities for students to understanding and skills or attitudes. There
conduct quasi-experimental and are two most important aspects, namely
exploratory for providing learning teaching materials and methods or learning
experience rather than simply listening to media as teaching aids. Learning media
lecturers' explanations. English Course is can enhance students’ learning process that
one of the general subjects and it is a is expected to enhance students’ learning
compulsory university course. The English outcomes. Proper use of media can be
language course is also one of the useful for students to learn according to
supplementary materials for the national their abilities, and can clarify the
education system in order to improve the presentation of messages. Furthermore, the
quality of Indonesian human beings, presence of media in the learning process
giving improvement of spirituality in order has a very urgent meaning, the lack of
to balance the progress of science and clarity of material delivered can be helped
technology today. A balance between the by presenting the media. The complexity
students’ expertise and additional of the material presented to students can be
knowledge gained during education. simplified with the media. In short, media
Students may be good at management or can be a solution.
accounting because their intellectual Using CAI-based learning model
intelligence is better. In other hand, of learning can be more efficient and
16
The 65th TEFLIN International Conference, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
12-14 July 2018

effective so that the enrichment of material use English actively in accordance with
to learners can be further improved, even majors.
with the ability of lecturers using this At TadulakoUniversity, non-
learning modelis able to bring students to English majors programmed English
level of analysis and exploration of each courses 1 and 2 in each semester. Each
learning material. Learning model is one department has been facilitated with a
of the factors that helped teacher to variety of patent and reliable technology
determine the success of teaching tools. Some departments in the faculty
(Ruhimat, 2009). Thus, the learning model have also had laboratories for the use of
can effectively assist students and lecturers language learning. In addition, teaching
in delivering learning materials in relation English in each major has been widely
to the teaching objectives formulated in utilizing ICT in learning process. But, the
teaching plan. Under these conditions, problem then requires attention is the
CAI-based learning model can improve absence of design development of English
process efficiency and the quality of material in the majors according to the
teaching and learning outcomes. vision and mission. There is no
One of CAI-based learning models recommendation of the learning model and
is to use media, multimedia, or the unavailability of CAI-based
macromedia. This use is one of the various instructional modules.
programs in learning media. The Output of students who have
advantages of CAI are multimedia already programmed English courses are
displays, a mix of graphics, text, animation not able to use English in speaking
and sound. In addition, the program can according to their respective fields,
create interactive buttons with a movie, whereas students who have finished
make color transparencies in the movie, programmed English course must be able
make animated changes from one form to to speak English about economics, law,
another, can create animated movements agriculture, biology, or history. Based on
by following a predefined path, and can be the above background, the researcher is
converted and published into types such as interested in conducting applied product
swf, html, gif, jpg, png, exe, mov. So, it research about: Design of Material
can make the learning process more fun Development and Computerized Learning
and make learners are interested in the Model Based on Computer Assisted
material being taught. This is supported by Instruction (CAI) in Non English
the design of CAI-based English materials Language Department.
where each form of practical activities can In view of Hannafin & Peck the
be easily done by the students. On the classification of activity types in the CAI-
assumption that with integrative and based learning model is practice and
attractive English material development exercise sessions, tutorial or instructional
design applied and taught by using CAI- sessions, games, and simulations or
based learning model, the achievement of modeling (Hannafin & Peck, 1988). In
learning objectives can easily be reached practice and exercise sessions, computers
in the learning objectives, in this case the provide feedback on topics taught even
students are not only experts in the when using other media. Practice is very
department but the students are also able to important in many skills. Some of things
that make a medium suitable for practice

17
Hastini
and exercise are medium with computer of computers as an integral part of the
capabilities that can manipulate numbers instructional system, where usually the
quickly, can adapt students needs, provide user is bound to a two-way interaction
quick feedback, and continue to provide with the computer. On the other hand
instruction when students find learning understanding CAI is similar to teaching
difficulties. In addition, tutorial and and learning activities involving various
instructional sessions become sessions that types of activities, namely: practice and
trigger students’ independence in learning. exercise sessions, tutorial or instructional
In a tutorial or instructional session, the sessions, games, and simulations or
computer actually teaches new modeling.
information. This process resembles the Learning technology with ICT
interaction that involves students and continues to grow with time. But, in
lecturers when the learning process. The principle the technology can be grouped
lecturer gives the concept, each student into two, namely: Technology based
understands the concepts and the learning and Technology based web-
subsequent instruction provided based on learning. Technology based learning
the student's response. consists principally of Audio Information
The wise educator chooses CAI Technologies (radio, audio tape, voice
method in accordance with the learning mail telephone) and Video Information
activities, learning profiles, external Technologies (video tape, video text, video
constraints, and specific goals that he must messaging). While technology based web-
meet. CAI based learning is a learning that learning is basically Data Information
based on the concept of computer and Technologies (bulletin board, Internet, e-
multimedia learning and requires LAN, mail, tele-collaboration).
WAN, or internet. The use of ICT requires Benefits that can be obtained by
technological devices. students and lecturers in the application of
Therefore,Computer Assisted Instruction CAI-based learning model. For the
(CAI) is computer-assisted in learning learners, it is clear that the CAI learning
process or learning that fully uses model will train the independence of
computer, tool, media, multimedia and learners. In addition, it also makes it easy
CAI based on material development for learners to access learning materials
design. from anywhere. Therefore, learners can
In some concepts, CAI is explained save costs and time. Clearly, the most
supportive with CAI-based English important advantage is that learners can
learning model where various practice and learn according to their abilities without
exercise activity in English language can need to feel inferior or embarrassed with
be done well. Sumarno states that CAI other friends, who may be faster and
generally refers to all educational software clever in learning. The following are some
accessed through computers where users of the benefits that can be gained for
can interact with it (Sumarno, learners with a CAI-based learning model.
2011).Computer system can present a In particular, learners can build
series of learning programs to students, interactions when learners engage in
either in the form of concept information discussions, learners can repeat difficult
or exercise questions to achieve certain learning materials over and over again
goals, and the system to do learning until understanding is obtained (Sunardi,
activities by interacting with computer Raden, & Harjo, 2014, p. 42).In addition,
systems. It can be said that CAI is the use learners can develop technical skills in
18
The 65th TEFLIN International Conference, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
12-14 July 2018

using the internet, responsible for their this research the researcher chose the
learning performance, and build self- spiral model as referenced by (Cennamo &
knowledge and self-confidence. Kalk, 2005, p. 6). The spiral model was
Meanwhile, benefits for teachers, known 5 (five) development phases: (1)
CAI-based learning model also provides define, (2) design, (3) demonstrate, (4)
up-to-date material to learners. In develop, and (5) deliver. The population of
particular, the advantages of using this this study was students of Non-English
model is the ease of accessing anytime and majors of Tadulako University in this case
anywhere, reducing the cost of using economics faculty
learning materials, encouraging teachers to In accordance with the general
access up-to-date learning resources, and objectives of this study, create an English
enabling teachers to communicate their learning model with the design of material
ideas within anunlimited scope. For development through a CAI-based
managers of educational institutions,they learning model complete with media
have very large benefits, among them is to creation and implementation. So the most
improve the prestige and accountability of appropriate method to achieve the purpose
institutions, and provide opportunities to of this research is Research and
promote the development model through development (R & D). Borg & Gall
global media to the world. explains educational research and
development (R & D) is a process used to
Method develop and validate educational
The method of this research dealt production (Borg & Gall, 1989, p. 423).
with R&D composed of scientists or From this understanding can be seen that
researchers, which all tasked with applied the steps of research and development is a
research in scientific fields with university series of cycles, each step will be passed or
setting, which was aimed at designing and done always refers to the results of
developing English instructional material previous steps, until finally obtained a new
based on CAI model with website design educational products (Murni & Wati,
for producing future products or the 2013).R & D produces products that have
improvement of current products and been tested in the field and have been
procedures. Conducted research on revised at a certain level of effectiveness.
instructional material development of
education was appropriately done in Findings and Discussion
research and development (R&D). This research was conducted at
According to what Gay introduced about Faculty of Economics and Business of
introduction to research and development Tadulako University. The research was
(R&D), it was used in the following designed initially by R&D method but
condition. The purpose was not to test a after observation at location found some
theory, but to develop and validate the factors that hinder to directly apply
whole components in certain concept for research and development. In addition, at
the working of effectiveness. The product the same time the curriculum at the
must be developed to fulfill needs of users University has improved needs
based on a decided model. R&D resulted revitalization of the new curriculum
products which have been validated in the oriented KKNI or according to Law No.
field and revised as needed (Gay, 1991). In 44 of 2015 on national standards of higher

19
Hastini
education, and Presidential Regulation No. Faculty of Economics and Business. Based
8 of 2012 on the Indonesian National on the results of observations conducted, it
Qualification Framework (KKNI). The was found that the lack of documents and
researcher takes this step of change archives of English learning tools available
without compromising the content and in the Faculty of Economics and Business
purpose of this study. The researcher uses became one of the causes why the students
design research methods to improve the is not motivated to learn English
quality of English learning through CAI, independently. In every study program
designing or improving previous designs, there is no availability of English language
and implementing learning with reference materials used in the faculty environment
to the theory and principles of reality that should exist.
based on the teaching of the Faculty of
Economics and Business. Product Validityin Workshop
The steps taken by the method of The development of CAI products
design research (Gravemeijer & Cobb, in this study focused on multimedia using
2006)are 1). Preparing for the experiment computers with blog-based online
(research preparation); 2). Design instruction, learning English beginning
experiment (implementation of with needs analysis, learning design
experimental design); 3). Retrospective development, product development, expert
analysis (analysis of data obtained from validation, product revision, and then
previous stages). product testing. Based on these steps have
been generated research data into the
Document results of the workshop on the
Documentation is used to collect development of materials as follows.
data relating to teaching English in the

Table1
Assessment of Expert for Eligible Product Material CAI
APPEARAN
NO NAME POSITION ELIGIBLE EFFECTIVE
CE PROG
1 DR. HarifuddinThahir, DekanFekon 4.00 3.80 3.00 4.00
M.P
2 Drs. DosenBahasaI 3.85 4.00 3.75 4.00
KhaeruddinThaha, nggrisFekon
M.Hum
3 Muhsin, S.Pd., M.Pd DosenBahasaI 4.50 4.25 4.00 4.50
nggris
4 DR. Ferry Rita, DosenBahasaI 4.00 4.00 3.75 4.00
M.Hum nggris
5 Hj. Hastini, S.Pd., Koord.Prodi. 3.55 4.00 3.50 4.00
M.A BahasaInggris
6 Wahyudin, S.Pd., Pengajar Tim 3.50 3.75 3.65 4.00
M.Pd MKU
7 DR. Mawardin M. PengajarTim 3.75 3.80 4.00 4.00
Said, M.Hum MKU
PenilaianRata-Rata 3.88 3.94 3.66 4.07
Based on the data above, next qualitative data, it is based on the
conversion is to change quantitative to following analysis.
20
The 65th TEFLIN International Conference, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
12-14 July 2018

Table 2
Conversion of Data Qualitative
Grade Score Interval Data Qualitative
A 5 X > 4,08 Excellent
B 4 3,36 < X < 4,08 Good
C 3 2,64 < X < 3,36 Fair
D 2 1,92 < X < 2,64 Less
E 1 X < 1,92 Poor
Adapted interval score (Sukardjo, 2005).
`
The data of the workshop is the productis considered appropriate for the
data obtained based on the assessment of use in learning process.
material and media experts through the Based on the test result, it is known
workshop. The material expert assesses the that two out of three students showed the
content and learning aspects, the media attractiveness of CAI multimedia
expert judges the display and developed on the criterion "very
programming aspects. After the analysis, interesting", while one student showed the
the average score of expert material appeal of multimedia on "interesting"
valuation for content aspect was 3.88 and criterion. In a classroom test, it is well
for learning aspect was 3.94. Using a score known that the management, development
range of 1 to 5, the average score of expert study, and accounting classes showed the
material judgments for content and attractiveness of the product on the "very
learning aspects in accordance with the 5 interesting" criterion. While eight students
score scale conversion guidelines is showed the attractiveness of the product
“good”. on the "interesting" criterion. The criterion
Meanwhile, the average score of of attractiveness is obtained based on the
expert media assessment for display aspect conversion of quantitative data to the
of 3.66 and the programming aspect of qualitative data of scale 5 (Sukardjo, 2005,
4.07. The average score of expert media pp. 53-54).It can be concluded that the
judgments on the aspect of display and product developed "is very interesting".
programming is “good” criterion. This conclusion is based on more than half
Based on the results mentioned the number of students showed the
above, it is concluded that CAI with the attractiveness of the product is on the
focus of blog-based multimedia learning is criterion "very interesting".
feasible to be used in learning both in
terms of content and learning aspects as Observation
well as from display and programming Observationis used to collect data
aspects because it obtains the average on students’ learning activities, lecturer’s
value of the overall "B" or is classified as activities in managing English learning
"Good". This conclusion is taken in process. In addition, students and lecturer
accordance with the feasibility value set in activities data are recorded and trancribed
this study that if the material and media in to a description. The result of
experts give a minimum grade "C" or with observation indicates that lecturerused
the criteria of "fair", the development of minimal methods and media in the
classroom teaching activities. The results
15
Hastini
are obtained from indirect interviews with lecturer to access online learning
lecturers and students who have resources.
programmed English language courses. Based on the observations above,
Constraints generally experienced by the researcher stated that with CAI-based
students are monotonous teaching and learning it is possible to improve student's
often boring that reducedthe students’ motivation in learning English because the
interest in learning, so it is very difficult to taught material can be accessed through
improve learning achievement, especially computer facilities, laptop, android, tab,
English. While lecturer facesmany and other facilities. This can be an
difficulties in applying teaching methods overcome by the researcher with CAI-
because of facilities weaknesses such as based research results. The following
online connections, electricity, and presented the results of the students'
computer devices that help and facilitate assessment of the prototype of CAI-based
learning model.
Table3
Conversion of Students Qualitative Data Assessment
Grade Score Interval Data Qualitative
A 5 X > 4,08 Very Interesting
B 4 3,36 < X < 4,08 Interesting
C 3 2,64 < X < 3,36 Fair
D 2 1,92 < X < 2,64 Uninteresting
E 1 X < 1,92 Strongly
Uninteresting
Adapting interval assessment (Sukardjo, 2005)

This result is evidence from the CAI-based learning. The results obtained
conversion result that 45 students rated, an by the students showed a significant
average of 4.10 on the feasibility of using improvement in English learning process.
the product. In addition, students also Besides the written test, the researcher also
found that application in the classroom conducted an oral English test and found
was believed to increase students’ great results that there are some students of
motivation and learning in the classroom, CAI English-based subjects have
it is indicatedthe students’ assessment demonstrated their ability by being able to
average was 4.76 or “very interesting” speak to answer the researcher's questions
interval. although with less grammatical, but
overall an improvement compared to
Result of Test previous learning is very successful after
this research.
The test is used to collect data on
students' learning outcomes after obtaining
Table 4
Students Grade of English with CAI-based Learning Model
NO STUDENTS MAJORS SCORE GRADE
1 RATKLIF FEBRIANTO MANAGEMENT 78.00 B+
2 CLAUDIA M. BAGINDA MANAGEMENT 65.00 C+
3 ZAINAL MURSYID MANAGEMENT 88.00 A
4 SULFIANTI S. MANAGEMENT 62.00 C+
5 YULIANTI DWI ASTUTI MANAGEMENT 80.00 B+
6 MAGFIRA MANAGEMENT 65.00 C+
16
Hastini
7 MUH. ALFISYAR AR. MANAGEMENT 75.00 B
8 WAHYU FRIZA MANAGEMENT 80.00 B+
9 NUR ANISA MANAGEMENT 75.00 B
10 ANNISA ANGGRAINI A. MANAGEMENT 80.00 B+
11 M. TAKDIR MANAGEMENT 85.00 A-
12 DEVA YULIANTI MANAGEMENT 95.00 A
13 MOHAMMAD FAHMI MANAGEMENT 90.00 A
14 ILHAM AKBAR MANAGEMENT 65.00 C+
15 MUHAMMAD ASLAM AZIS MANAGEMENT 65.00 C+
16 KUDRAT SUMAGA MANAGEMENT 85.00 A-
17 MUH. RIDWAN JAFAR MANAGEMENT 84.00 A-
18 SUKRI DEVEL.STUDY 65.00 C+
19 AXEL DAVID ANUGRAH P. DEVEL.STUDY 98.00 A
20 IRHAN DEVEL.STUDY 85.00 A-
21 JULIANTO DEVEL.STUDY 85.00 A-
22 YAYUK SAHARA DEVEL.STUDY 75.00 B
23 NURUL ARINI DEVEL.STUDY 65.00 C+
24 ELOISON F. WENGKAU DEVEL.STUDY 85.00 A-
25 RITA VERONIKA DEVEL.STUDY 85.00 A-
26 ANDREW K. PANDU'U DEVEL.STUDY 75.00 B
27 ANDI RIANSYAH LATJUBA ACCOUNTING 85.00 A-
28 YUSRIPAL ACCOUNTING 95.00 A
29 ARDIANSYAH ACCOUNTING 90.00 A
30 INCE ARFIANI ACCOUNTING 80.00 B+
31 INDRIANY ACCOUNTING 70.00 B-
32 SIDHIK PRAMONO JATI ACCOUNTING 75.00 B
33 EKA RIZKA RAMADHANTY ACCOUNTING 65.00 C+
34 NUGRAHA PUTRA ACCOUNTING 65.00 C+
35 MAYA RISKA ACCOUNTING 85.00 A-
36 NANANG WAHYULLAH ACCOUNTING 75.00 B
37 BUDI PUTRA PERSADA ACCOUNTING 85.00 A-
38 NEDYA SININTA ACCOUNTING 70.00 B-
39 CHRISTIAN OKTAVIANI ACCOUNTING 75.00 B
40 MOH. DEDDY PRATAMA ACCOUNTING 85.00 A-
41 RISKA ACCOUNTING 80.00 B+
42 DEDE KURIANG ACCOUNTING 80.00 B+
43 ANDRIANI S. LAODE ACCOUNTING 65.00 C+
44 PUTRI WAHYU LESTARI ACCOUNTING 80.00 B+
45 DELLY RIA NOVITHA M. ACCOUNTING 80.00 B+
Mean Score (Average) 78.22 B+

Result of analysis based on the classical passing grade is obtained 78% of


studentsscores, there were 6 students got the students got the complete score
A, 11 students got A-, 9 got B+, 7 got B, (minimum B-).
and 2 got B- so the total amountwere 35
students got the complete score. While the Result of Interview
number of 10 students got score C+, in this Interview wasdone to collect
case the total students took the test were lecturers’ response data on English based
45 students.In comparison, learning with learning at the Faculty of Economics and
the CAI model proved to have a positive Business. Interview data was obtained in
impact on improving students' ability. It April 2017 at the Faculty of Economics
can be explained that in the previous and Business of Tadulako University.
English class that did not use the CAI After completing the questionnaire, the
model, the average students score is B-. lecturers were directly interviewed. The
After applying the learning with CAI researcher interviewed the lecturers
model the students score is B+, and the directly one by one in the rest area at the
16
Hastini
Faculty of Economics and Business office. lecturers of English subjects in the Faculty
The English materials used in the Faculty of Economics and Business. The
of Economics and Business are mostly researcher did not invite all lecturers
made by respective lecturers themselves. because of limited time.Therefore, only
There are teams from MKU that provide senior lecturers with experience teaching
outlines but the design and content of the in the Faculty of Economics and Business
materials taught are mostly made by the are invited with the hope that their
lecturers themselves, the team consists of experiences and contribution can be really
several lecturers appointed by LABDAS given in the effort of drafting the design
(formerly MKU unit at university). Two and English learning model at Faculty of
lecturers who teach sometimes use English Economics and Business.
material that has a correlation with the
economy but only partly. Then the other Discussion
lecturers teach Basic English material. English Learning Design
Actually, at Tadulako University students At this stage, the researcher is in
learn speaking, reading, writing and the preparing for the experiment and
listening but only a few that discuss about preparingthe learning process or
economics in English speaking. hypothetical learning trajectory (HLT). In
All the lecturers interviewed making HLT researcher does: a).
explained that English material taught in Literature review as well as discussions
the Faculty of Economics and Business is with English lecturers in Faculty of
relevant but has not fulfilled the needs of Economics and Business who are
students connected with the field of work experienced in English content. The
that they get in the future. All lecturers direction of the vision and mission of the
basically agree with the application that faculty is very influential on the outcomes
English is used to communicate daily, in of alumni who are rescued can be used for
other words English becomes important in the learning process; b). Making the
field of work because it assists students in Englishlearning tools based on data and
improving their ability to work real world. documents and learning tools in the
Based on a result of research that mostly faculty, some learning tools made in
based on interviews with business people, English, among others: syllabus, RPS,
economists and other experts English is learning media, teaching aids and teaching
important as much of the English you will materials oriented KKNI; c). The design of
hear in your professional life will be CAI-based English learning model, by
spoken by people who don’t have English combining English language learning
as their first language(MacKenzie, 2010). syntax and data obtained from the faculty
In this case, English always becomes as the context of its realistic problems. The
important to be learnt for its usefulness learning model stages are:
although with they who are non-native 1) The use of context-based excellence
speakers.But a lecturer questioned whether faculty of economics and business.
it is applicable or not for the reason 2) The use of progressive models.
English major itself does not apply daily 3) Utilization of student construction
English in communicating even with other results
majors. 4) Development of interactivity and
Based on the results of the character
interviews, the researcher then conducted a
meeting for sharing perception among
16
The 65th TEFLIN International Conference, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
12-14 July 2018

students' ability in active English both


Pre-Design Prototype of English orally and in writing in the field
Learning Material management, development, and
At this stage, the researcherand accounting as well as the field of
lecturers undertook the pre-design study of economics in general.
CAI learning prototype in all majors at the Next is a workshop model for
Faculty of Economics and Business. In preparation of materials that are held
preliminary design review of the together by involving students and
prototype, the researcher and several lecturers of course subjects to balance the
partner lecturers observed and checked the interests, needs, and opportunities
suitability and feasibility of prototype availability of resources used. Students
CAI-based English learning design. Some engagement is useful because students
sources of learning are used as references directly sort and select the material and
for teaching English subjects in all majors subject matter that is absolutely necessary
at the Faculty of Economics and Business in their majors. In addition, it supported
but no recommended teaching materials. the future needs of students in the world of
This is because of no coordination among work so that certain topics can be selected
the faculty, study program, and lecturers of directly by the students and then refined by
English subjects who notabenenya are the course team, and then compiled based
mostly lecturers of English Education on the criteria of design teaching materials
Program from FKIP UNTAD. In general, English oriented KKNI or SN DIKTI .
the materials recommended for teaching
English in the Faculty of Economics and CAI-Based Learning Model of English
Business do not meet the criteria and The form of CAI varies suitable
content of English for economics. with material characteristics and objectives
English 2 book is the result of to be achieved. It is described by Hannafin
learning preparation MKU Team and & Peck that some forms of CAI media,
managed by Language Center of Tadulako namely (1) Tutorial, tutorial form program
University and is mostly used by English follow the tutor system conducted by the
lecturers. Based on the results of study instructor, but without the presence of
with English language course instructor in instructor. The interaction that occurs only
the Faculty of Economics and Business, between students and the material
then resulting teaching tools based on CAI presented is communicative as if there was
include sillabus, RPS, and CAI-based a tutor directing the learning. (2) Drill-and-
Textbook. The CAI-based learning tool is practice, a drill-and-practice form allows
the result of integration of several sources students to improve the skills of a
of teaching materials recommended by previously taught concept, rule, or
lecturers of course subjects through procedure through practice and examples.
perception equation activities. After that, (3) Simulation, the simulation program
the recommendation is then analyzed in tries to resemble the dynamic process that
the next activity is the workshop of RPS occurs in the real world, so it is as though
and CAI-based materials management that as studentsare experiencing the real event
produces the product in the form of CAI- without having to face the real risk. (4)
based English learning tool as a model. Instructional Games or learning games,
This model is trusted to improve the this program contains games related to the

17
Hastini
subject matter (Hannafin & Peck, 1988, important point. Nim Park& Son have
pp. 139-157). conducted a research and they concluded
On the other hand, according to that internal factors such as teachers’
Rusman, the form of CAI media, namely limited computer skills, knowledge about
(1) Drill and Practice, drills program will computers and beliefs and perceptions also
be implanted certain habits in the form of seem to significantly affect teachers’
exercise (Rusman, 2012).By the decisions on the use of CALL (in this case
continuous practice, it can be embedded CAI) (Nim Park & Son, 2009).
and become a habit. Flowcharts for In line with opinion (Hannafin &
pouring content and computer-based Peck, 1988, pp. 8-10), CAI media
learning systems into CAI programs are applications have the advantage of
done through the creation of flowcharts. increasing individual interaction, cost
(2) Tutorials, tutorial program is basically effectiveness, easy data storage, and
the same as the guidance program that motivating learners. From the results of
aims to provide assistance to students in this study described the benefits and
order to achieve optimal learning strengths of using CAI products in
outcomes. (3) Simulations, this program learning English subjects on the students
displays subject matter that is packaged in of the Faculty of Economics and Business
the form of simulations of learning in the as follows: (1) Improve interaction, CAI
form of animation that explains the content media can cause interaction between
in an interesting, life, and combines students and computers; (2) Individuals,
elements of text, images, audio, motion, with CAI media students can decide for
and harmoniously harmonious colors. (4) themselves what they do first; (3)
Instructional Games, the program is to Administrative advantages and cost-
provide a learning experience that provides effectiveness; (4) Giving motivation,
learning facilities to enhance students' computer able to give illustration,
skills through an educational game animation, music, narration and interesting
(Rusman, 2012). appearance that can give effect to students;
The form of learning that is (5) Immediate feedback, CAI media
displayed on the development of this CAI developers can design a learning situation
is drill and practice in variation with online that requires students to do something and
blog based simulation. Submission of get positive feedback immediately after
materials with drill and practice is chosen students do something; (6) Easily store
because with this system, students can data; (7) Integrity of learning, a teacher
receive materials at once and practice cannot convey the exact same thing for the
speaking, writing, reading, and listening second time; and (8) Students control
skills. This can motivate students in using computer-assisted learning program
learning, so that the learning process is applications can control their own learning
effective and have variations in the situation, and the students can also adjust
learning process. In this product the speed of learning or choose interesting
development process, to process design on topics for them.
CAI, researcher use Adobe Photoshop CS6 Based on the results of analysis, it
application, Corel draw X5, quiz can be concluded that the student's English
application designer hot potatoes, and language ability is relatively low can be
weblog online blogspot.com. In this solved by applying CAI-based material
research the lecturer skill in designing CAI design. This is based on test results
model with computer function becomes an indicating that 78% of the total 45 students
18
The 65th TEFLIN International Conference, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
12-14 July 2018

took the test obtained a complete score focus of blog-based multimedia learning
with an average 78.22 or B+. This data feasible to be used in learning both in
reinforces the finding that the average of terms of content and learning aspects as
students' previous English skills when the well as from the aspect of display and
class is taught does not use CAI-based programming because it obtains the
material design is still low on average with average score of the overall "B" or
the final grade B-. pertained "Good" criterion. Based on the
According to the studentsneeds test result, it is known that two out of three
(wants) that English learning 50% of students showed the attractiveness of CAI
students place an increase in oral multimedia developed on the criterion
communication or speaking skills "very interesting", while one student
(Speaking) and 30% writing as a top showed the appeal of multimedia on
priority in learning English for preparing "interesting" criterion. In a classroom
to enter the workforce. The results also practice, it is well known that the
show that CAI is effective in reading management, development study, and
activities. An interactive instructional accounting classes showed the
technique whereby a computer is used to attractiveness of the product on the "very
present the instructional material and interesting" criterion.
monitor the learning takes place. CAI uses
a combination of text, graphics, sound and Reference
video may trigger the learners in learning
(Silva, 2016). Alqunayeer, H. S., & Zamir, S. (1987).
English for specific purposes. New
Conclusion York: Cambridge University.
CAI in this case is applied in Alqunayeer, H. S., & Zamir, S. (2016).
English class in Faculty of Economics and Needs Analysis of Saudi EFL
Business. In general, lecturers contend the Female Students: A Case Study of
design of the material is very decisive in Qassim University. Journal of
improving students' English proficiency in Curriculum and Teaching, 5(1),
the Faculty of Economics and Business. 87.
All lecturers are also confident and
optimistic that CAI-based learning model Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989).
can improve students' English proficiency. Educational Research: An
The results of this research is the Introduction, Fifth Edition. New
result of the development of multimedia York: Longman Inc.
English learning in the Faculty of Cennamo, K., & Kalk, D. (2005). Real
Economics and Business through steps of World Instructional Design. From
analyzing, designing, producing, Thompson Learning. Retrieved
validating, revising, and testing. The January 12, 2015, from Available
quality of multimedia-based learning CAI at UT-Coop and
developed in terms of content and learning www.Amazon.com
is “good”. Using a score interval 1 to 5, the
content aspect showed an average score Gay, L. R. (1991). Educational Evaluation
3.88 and the learning aspect showed an and Measurement: Competencies
average score 3.94. While CAI with the for Analysis and Application.

19
Hastini
Second edition. New York: Rusman. (2012). Model – Model
Macmillan Publishing Company. Pembelajaran. Depok: PT
Rajagrafindo Persada.
Ghozali, I. (2011). Pengembangan Buku
Teks Bahasa Inggris Integratif: Silva, T. B. (2016). The Effects of the I-
Penelitian Pengembangan Ready Computer Assisted
Pendidikan di Sekolah Menengah Instruction Program on the
Kejuruan Jurusan Usaha Jasa Reading and Fluency Achievement
Pariwisata Di Yogyakarta. of First Graders. California:
Yogyakarta: Linguistik Peminatan Doctoral dissertation, California
Utama Pengajaran Bahasa Program State University, Stanislaus.
Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Sukardjo. (2005). Evaluasi pembelajaran.
Maret. Buku Ajar (Tidak diterbitkan)
Gravemeijer, & Cobb. (2006). Educational Matakuliah Evaluasi
Design Research. New York: Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Prodi
Taylor and Francis Group. TP PPs UNY.
Hannafin, M. J., & Peck, K. L. (1988). The Sumarno, A. (2011, Januari 1). Model
Design, Development and Pembelajaran Konvensional.
Evaluation of Instructional Retrieved April 23, 2015, from
Software. New York: Macmillan http://blog.elearning.unesa.ac.id/ali
Publishing Company. m¬sumarno¬/model-pembelajaran
konvensional:
MacKenzie, I. (2010). English for
http://blog.elearning.unesa.ac.id
Business Studies Student's Book: A
Course for Business Studies and Sunardi, N. A., Raden, & Harjo, B. (2014).
Economics Students. The Third Model Pembelajaran Inklusif
Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge Bahasa Inggris bagi Mahasiswa
University Press. Tunanetra di Perguruan Tinggi.
Semarang: Universitas Dian
Murni, D., & Wati, R. (2013). Penelitian
Nuswantoro: Laporan Penelitian
Dosen Pemula Pembelajaran
Hibah Bersaing November 2014.
Bahasa Inggris Berbasis Kearifan
Lokal. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Surjono, H. D., & Susila, H. R. (2013).
Bersaing. Tanjungpinang: Pengembangan Multimedia
Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji. Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris untuk
SMK. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi,
Nim Park, C., & Son, J. B. (2009).
4(2).
Implementing Computer-Assisted
Language Learning in the EFL
Classroom: Teachers’ Perceptions
and Perspectives. International
Journal of Pedagogies and
Learning, 5(2), 80-101.
Ruhimat, T. (2009). Kurikulum &
Pembelajaran. Bandung: Jurusan
Kurtekpend FIP UPI.

20
The 65th TEFLIN International Conference, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
12-14 July 2018

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to thank all parties
who have contributed in this study. First,
great thanks is addressed to students of
economics and business faculty at
Tadulako University who have directly
contributed in study during one academic
year, particularly in teaching and learning
process in classroom. Still thanks in
advance for participating in accessing and
enrolling online with CAI media. Second,
thanks to Dean of Economics and Business
Faculty who acted as the Coordinator of
Research grant team scheme
STRANAS.Third, special thanks is
addressed to Prof. Dr. Ir. Muhammad
Basir, S.E., M.S as Rector of Tadulako
University who has significantly supported
the researcher conducting the research for
contributing to economics and business
students. Further, great appreciation
belongs to all colleagues the lecturers at
economics and business faculty for their
details and clear tips in writing article and
sending paper to conference as well.
Finally, thanks to all parties at Tadulako
University for unlimited suggestions and
ideas given to the researcher during the
study and advices for attending the
TEFLIN conference at Universitas Negeri
Makassar.

Hastini is a lecturer at Tadulako


University Palu, Central Sulawesi. She is
an active lecturer at English Department of
Teacher Training and Education Faculty.
She is actively conducting research and
community service under grant of Ministry
of Research, Technology and Higher
Education of the Republic of Indonesia.
She is also current coordinator of English
study program at Tadulako University.

21

You might also like