Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
FOCUS ON
:
Energy
Storage
Simulation
for All
Democratize simulation via fast
hardware and easy-to-use software. P.14
Winners demand the best. Ferrari would know. It has one of the best
racing records the world over.
Visit ANSYS.COM/Ferrari to learn how simulation software can help you realize your product promise.
UP TO 4.5GHz & 2 GPUs
LIQUID COOLING
PROFESSIONAL
OVERCLOCKING
Managing Simulation
Democratization
A
s the walls separating design engineers and ana- Even if a design engineer has some analysis skills, he/she has
lysts continue to crumble, workflows are evolving plenty to do in the design process without taking on more.
to take advantage of new technologies that help The key is to find that sweet spot where design engineers
make the design process more efficient. However, can quickly get answers that will help them refine designs
there’s a perennial problem slowing that evolution to a crawl. without waiting in a queue for analysis, which frees up the
The fact that there are more design engineers than ana- analyst to work on the most promising and refined product
lysts is nothing new. What’s exasperating this bottleneck in iterations or the most complicated simulations.
the design cycle is widespread access to more advanced com- There are a number of approaches being applied, from
puting hardware and software that allows design engineers simulation tools that are integrated in popular CAD packages
to consider more “what-if” iterations. All of those promising to software that focuses on particular industries or engineer-
potential designs from all of those engineers need to be sim- ing problems, to user interfaces and templates that can guide
ulated and analyzed — often by a very small team of analysts. design engineers through some common simulation tasks. The
problem with many of these approaches is that they’re either
too specific to be applied to other designs and industries or too
The app model has the potential general to be really useful in analyzing specific problems. The
to alter the design workflow. ultimate solution — in addition to training more analysts — is
to combine all of these approaches into a custom solution for
each customer. That’s where apps come in.
Simulation for All?
The obvious solution would be to provide simulation and Analysts as Developers, Managers
analysis tools to more design engineers. What’s not so ob- MathWorks, the developer of MATLAB and Simulink, pro-
vious is how to best do that. Simulation and analysis re- vided a path to specialized application development and de-
quires specialized skills not all design engineers have. For ployment. Its MATLAB Central File Exchange allows the
example, here are the requirements from a recent job post company and customers to share custom applications, classes,
for a modeling, simulation and analyst intern: code examples, drivers, functions, Simulink models, scripts,
• Knowledge of programming languages: FORTRAN, C/C++ and videos. A community of users has developed around File
• Good verbal and written communication skills Exchange, sharing apps and expertise.
• Knowledge of basic physics and its application to modeling COMSOL is taking a similar tack with its Application
and analysis Builder, which allows experts to create specialized multiphysics
• Knowledge of physics, random variables and its application apps that non-experts can use to simulate changes they make to
to modeling and analysis variables defined by the expert analyst. (For more examples of
• Familiarity and knowledge of system engineering and analysis the democratization of simulation, see page 14.)
• Experience in software development processes, object The app model has the potential to alter the design work-
oriented design, and real-time applications flow. It provides analysts with the tools they need to become
• Debugging/Analysis methodologies in optimizing application software developers, albeit on a small scale. Those apps will
performance no doubt need updated as design engineers request more
• Understanding of computer architecture and design and features. The designs informed by those apps will still need
digital system modeling and simulation experience a final analysis, but the potential is there for the analyst to
• Ability to troubleshoot simulations problems and write become the management hub of design activity, rather than
post processing scripts. a bottleneck in the process. DE
• Shell/Perl/Python scripting
If that’s what’s expected of an intern, you can imagine Jamie Gooch is the editorial director of Desktop Engineering.
what is required of a full-time simulation and analysis expert. Contact him at jgooch@deskeng.com.
14 The “Appification”
of Simulation
DESIGN
33 Consortium Tackles
Materials Data Challenge
AutoMatIC aims to develop
automotive industry-specific standards
and best practices for organizing,
managing and sharing critical
materials data.
By Beth Stackpole
39 Exploration, Optimization
and Iterative Design
The industry is seeing new
Mimicking the ease of use and breakthroughs in software
platforms to help teams
specialization of mobile apps may generate more ideas in
help expand the reach of simulation. early-stage design.
By Kenneth Wong By Brian Albright
PROTOTYPE
SIMULATE 42 Ease of Use is the
New Mission in CAM
18 The Rise of the An overture to makers adds
Simulation Stack new players, challenges
New alternatives in existing CAM software
high-performance developers to improve ease
computing are rewriting of use.
the CAE playbook. By Kenneth Wong
By Randall S. Newton
ENGINEERING COMPUTING
FOCUS ON ENERGY STORAGE
22 Computer Cluster Considerations
A look at some of the top items engineers should
account for when selecting an HPC cluster.
25 Powering Up Battery Design
By Jess Lulka with Multiphysics Simulation
From single cell to system-level
controls, there’s software for
36 Peak Performer every stage of electric and hybrid
The new over-clocked electric vehicle battery design.
workstation from BOXX By Pamela J. Waterman
delivers high-end results.
By David Cohn 30 Powering the Internet of Things
How do engineers figure out a way
to run a massive network
of wireless sensors?
By Mark Clarkson
Intel, the Intel logo, Xeon, and Xeon Inside are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries.
*Measured by SPECviewperf 12.0.1 running Windows 7 Professional (64-bit, SP1), comparing sw-03 on the Tower 5810
(Intel® Xeon® processor E5-1680 v3, Windows 8.1, Quadro K620, 32GB (8x4GB DDR4 2100) memory) & a T3500 (Intel® Xeon®
processor W3680 CPU, Windows 8.1, Quadro 600, 12GB of memory). Built for Pros
© 2014 Dell Inc. All rights reserved. Dell, the DELL logo, the DELL badge and Dell Precision are trademarks of Dell Inc. with Intel Inside®.
April 2015 VOLUME 20/ISSUE 8
EDITORIAL
8 Virtual Desktop Jamie J. Gooch | Editorial Director
Kenneth Wong | Senior Editor
Onshape Beta goes live, Ford implements Anthony J. Lockwood | Editor at Large
a new enterprise MDO strategy and NASA Jess Lulka | Associate Editor
uses MathWorks platforms to launch the
Orion mission.
47 Fast Apps CONTRIBUTING EDITORS
Tony Abbey, Brian Albright, Mark Clarkson,
MSC Software’s Marc accelerates system David S. Cohn, John Newman, Frank Ohlhorst,
By Kenneth Wong and Beth Stackpole
analysis, Optimation develops a data Beth Stackpole, Peter Varhol, Pamela J. Waterman
Visit Deskeng.com
SUBSCRIBER CUSTOMER SERVICE
Desktop Engineering ® magazine
PO Box 677 • Northbrook, IL 60065-0677
847-559-7581 • Fax 847-564-9453
E-mail: den@omeda.com
• Navigation Desktop Engineering® (ISSN 1085-0422) is published
Quickly find the content you’re looking monthly by Peerless Media, LLC, a division of EH
Publishing, Inc. 111 Speen St., Ste. 200 Framingham,
for in dedicated Design, Simulate, Test, MA 01701. Periodicals postage paid at Framingham, MA
PLM, Prototype/Manufacture, Engineering and additional mailing offices. Desktop Engineering® is
Services and Engineering Computing distributed free to qualified U.S. subscribers.
sections. Drill down deeper via individual SUBSCRIPTION RATES: for non-qualified; U.S. $108
one year; Canada and Mexico $126 one year; all other
topic areas, technology vendors and countries $195 one year.
authors within each section. Send all subscription inquiries to Desktop Engineering 111
Speen St. Ste. 200 Framingham, MA 01701
• Integration LIST RENTALS: For information on list rentals, contact
All of Desktop Engineering’s content — from Statlistics, Danbury, CT: 203-778-8700.
videos to Engineering Services Directory Postmaster: Send all address changes to Desktop
Engineering®, PO Box 1496 Framingham, MA 01701-
listings, to our blogs and social media 1496. Reproduction of this magazine in whole or part
posts — appear in our news feeds without written permission of the publisher is prohibited.
throughout the site. All rights reserved ©2015 Peerless Media, LLC.
Address all editorial correspondence to the Editor,
Desktop Engineering. Opinions expressed by the authors
• Presentation are not necessarily those of Desktop Engineering.
Larger images, text and video players with a Unaccepted manuscripts will be returned if accompanied
by a self-addressed envelope with sufficient first-class
neutral color scheme make postage. Not responsible for lost manuscripts or photos.
it easier to interact with the site’s content.
Check out the new deskeng.com and let us know what you think.
I
n early March, the beta ver-
sion of Onshape, developed by
SolidWorks cofounder and for-
mer CEO Jon Hirschtick, came
online. In this case, “online” is the
appropriate phrase, as the program
runs in a browser. No installation, no
client app — just a standard browser.
Your login and password gives you a
personal workspace with tutorials and
sample parts, your private library and
your shared documents.
Primarily Parametric
Onshape is a parametric CAD program
with a sketching environment, part
creation tools and assembly functions. The new mechanical CAD software Onshape, developed by former SolidWorks
Some creative tweaks to the usual talents, offers Google doc-style collaboration.
sketching workflow add a level of ease,
like the software’s ability to collectively
select entities based on a succession editors can be working on the same version made available to “Students &
of clicks (without resorting to the 3D model simultaneously. Individual Makers, View & Markup, Light-Duty
Ctrl+click or Shift+click) and the Offset changes are instantaneously visible Pros” limits you to five active private
tool that uses an arrow you can drag. to the rest. It’s a workflow made pos- documents.
The software has some direct-editing sible by Onshape’s cloud architecture, Even in its beta phase, Onshape ap-
tools, but they’re limited — that is, in making an argument to move CAD pears to be a stable parametric CAD
comparison to software like SpaceClaim, collaboration from desktop to the program, a new mechanical design
Solid Edge with Synchronous Technol- cloud or the browser. package that also takes on the chal-
ogy or Autodesk Fusion 360 that oper- Along with its simultaneous-edit- lenge to prove CAD in cloud is not
ates primarily as a direct-editing pro- ing interface, Onshape gives you the experimental but pragmatic.
gram. That’s a reasonable compromise, ability to create what’s called Branch
since a parametric program’s purpose is designs — multiple iterations of the Editor’s Note: Autodesk CEO Carl
usually not quick concept exploration main design. The idea is to let a num- Bass penned a blog post titled “Setting the
but detailed mechanical design. ber of engineers work on different Record Straight” in response to the launch
The direct-editing features avail- areas of the main design (for example, of Onshape, pointing out that Autodesk
able in Onshape, such as Move Face one person adding brackets and ribs Fusion 360 went to the cloud much earlier
or Rotate Face, work well in reconcil- in a region) or explore variations with than Onshape. Fusion 360 evolved from
ing the new geometry with previously slightly different geometry. At some what was previously Autodesk Inventor
established parametric constraints. But point, a project manager can then Fusion, Autodesk’s direct-editing CAD
Onshape won’t let you push and pull merge the details or the differences software. It is by comparison a more ma-
geometry, points and vertices freely the found in the Branch designs with the ture code than Onshape, with rendering,
way a program that’s designed from the main design, thus incorporating all simulation and CAM features integrated
ground up as a direct editor would. It the work (or rejecting a few, as the into the main CAD environment. The
requires a more disciplined workflow. case may be). software runs from a client program that
Onshape follows the a standard straddles both your local machine and the
Concurrent Collaboration SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) pricing cloud. Autodesk is also championing lower-
Another noteworthy feature of On- structure, offering a free version along cost subscription licensing instead of tradi-
shape is the Google doc-style col- with paid subscriptions beginning at tional perpetual licensing for desktops.
laboration function, where multiple $100 per user per month. The free —K. Wong
A
s multidisciplinary optimiza- provides the enterprise piece, extending appropriate technological tools to handle
tion spreads throughout all MDO knowledge to others within the this kind of information flow, the global
corners of its design process, organization.” product development time milestone
Ford Motor Co. has adopted a modeFRONTIER has been widely might be missed.”
new platform aimed at streamlining opti- deployed within Ford for years, helping
mization collaboration across a global de- cross-functional engineering teams make Sharing Knowledge
sign team while making multidisciplinary informed design tradeoffs. During early Enterprise MDO built around SOMO
design optimization (MDO) processes an efforts, Ford initially coordinated the automates the process and prevents
enterprise best practice. MDO work through a manual process human error. Moreover, MDO knowl-
Building on its decades-long MDO heavily reliant on meetings. Eventually, edge is captured through standardized
work with ESTECO’s modeFRON- that effort evolved into a more structured templates, which helps get new employ-
TIER, the auto giant is now implement- approach that tasked a formal MDO ees up to speed and enables Ford to pool
ing SOMO, an enterprise collaboration group with collecting models and re- its best resources from around the world,
and distributed execution framework quirements of multiple attribute design funneling their knowledge throughout all
born from the pair’s partnership and now teams into a single environment, that facets of the design process, says Fu.
a commercial piece of software. SOMO being modeFRONTIER, Fu says. “MDO processes become institution-
delivers the enterprise foundation that While having a team of MDO ex- alized and transparent, with engineers
extends Ford’s MDO efforts from its perts was beneficial, there was still a lot truly able to focus on their work without
roots as a desktop focused-task to a Web- of manual effort required to coordinate depending on the schedules of other de-
enabled solution, according to Yan Fu, efficient MDO processes, not to men- partment experts,” she says. “Actual mod-
Ford’s technical leader of business strat- tion the fact that the key domain-specific els and data become centralized — the
egy and engineering optimization. knowledge stayed with the appointed so-called, ‘single source of truth.’”
“SOMO’s mobile and Web interfaces MDO experts. “This can lead to bottle- A recent pilot project illustrates how
simplify access for non-MDO experts, necks in the process,” she says. “Just the process delivers benefits to Ford
helping provide visibility to all optimiza- imagine what happens when an expert engineers. Used in the design of a bigger
tion processes and results,” says Matteo leaves the company or is absent from model pickup truck, the optimization
Nicolich, product manager for Enter- work — the entire project can suffer analysis comprised three different truck
prise Solutions at ESTECO. “SOMO from huge delays. If you don’t have the sizes with the aim of minimizing the
weight while meeting all constraints re-
lating to safety, NVH and durability. The
final optimization workflow included
seven models, 113 variables and 34 re-
sponses — a workload that would have
taken at least a month to complete with
traditional MDO processes.
With SOMO integrated into the
Ford private cloud, engineers do their
own work and publish their latest models
to the shared platform so the entire team
can build the top-level MDO process
right away. Now, running a single model
simulation for one safety mode takes
about three hours using 32 CPUs while
execution of the entire multidisciplinary
optimization takes about eight days.
“This is something new that has revolu-
Ford’s Yan Fu explains the auto maker’s vision for an Enterprise Multidisciplinary tionized our way of working,” Fu says.
Design Optimization (EMDO) system built around ESTECO’s modeFRONTIER and
SOMO platforms. Image courtesy of ESTECO. —B. Stackpole
I
n 1981, Jon Friedman watched the
The Orion in the water, awaiting
first Columbia space shuttle’s launch
recovery. Image courtesy of NASA.
from a black-and-white TV screen.
Friedman, now the aerospace man-
ager at MathWorks, was watching the
first test flight of NASA Orion from an
iPad alongside his kids last December.
Time passes and children grow up, but
the passion for space exploration remains
the same in the Friedman household.
Friedman has another reason to care
about the Orion’s journey. When the
Orion sets its course for Mars, it will rely
on the guidance, navigation and control
(GN&C) software developed in partner- The GN&C software is critical in sign to find its breaking point. In software
ship with MathWorks to get there. the closed-loop simulation of the Orion’s simulation, Friedman says, “It’s important
“I want to congratulate the engineers flight. NASA uses the C++ flight code in to verify the model’s coverage, meaning,
at NASA, Lockheed Martin and Draper its flight simulation conducted in Trick, a you make sure you have explored all the
Laboratory who made it work,” says software-based simulation environment. different paths the software can take,
Friedman. “[MathWorks] has always This approach, MathWorks revealed, al- that you have fully exercised everything.”
been about accelerating the pace of dis- lows the apace agency to simulate a full That task was largely automated in the
covery in engineering and science.” 10-day Orion mission in just one day. Orion project using MathWorks’ Simu-
link Verification and Validation.
Acceleration via Automation MBD ABCs Developing the algorithms for the
The Orion project is also an exercise in Committing to the model-based design Orion GN&C software involves more
software development acceleration, made (MBD) approach meant a steep learning than 100 engineers. The MBD approach
possible by MathWorks’ MATLAB and curve for some engineers unaccustomed ensures all the works were done in syn-
SimuLink. Roughly 40,000 lines of code to the method. “We’ve seen that the chronicity. According to MathWorks,
were automatically generated by the return-on-investment for model-based “Simulink models serve as an executable
process, bypassing the need to schedule design could be in the range of 100- specification from which flight software
manual coding time. 200% over the lifespan of a program,” is automatically generated. As a result,
“Guiding the Orion craft to a splash- says Friedman, “because you discover the domain experts — the GN&C ana-
down point within a half mile of its chute errors earlier, can identify problems with lysts — work directly with the executable
deploy target required the strengths of requirements much earlier.” algorithm models rather than with docu-
the entire team,” says Mark Jackson, In software development, the “model” ments that must then be interpreted by
Draper Laboratory’s GN&C integration is not a detailed 3D CAD assembly (as software developers.”
lead for the NASA team. “By combining the case would be with MBD in manu- Friedman quipped that his son is also
Draper’s entry guidance algorithm with facturing) but a graphical representation learning the art of MBD in a class exer-
the auto-generated code capability of of the dynamic system of the spacecraft. cise where he and his classmates must
MATLAB and Simulink, the team met “Simulink Advisor can essentially inter- model a city block together in Minecraft
NASA’s objectives for landing guidance, rogate the model to make sure it meets — without accidentally building high
navigation, and control.” your standards, that it doesn’t include rises on top of one another.
“With this approach, you don’t have certain constructs you don’t want,” Fried- The NASA Orion leadership team is
to wait for the best software coders in man says. “For example, if you decide to currently on the road in California, with
the team to hand-code the software. The permit only linear models of actuators, stops planned at the NASA’s Jet Propul-
code-generator can easily reproduce Simulink can catch the nonlinear models sion Laboratory in Pasadena, Aerojet
code, so when you have a design con- that might have snuck in.” Rocketdyne in Sacramento and Lock-
figuration you like, you can automatically In mechanical system modeling, engi- heed Martin’s Sunnyvale facility.
generate the code,” says Friedman. neers may try to push the limits of the de- —K. Wong
3D Printed Materials
Reveal Stress Monash University 3D Prints Complete Jet Engine
Researchers at the University of
Washington are combining functional
M any companies are investigating
in methods of using additive
manufacturing to replace complex parts
polymers with 3D printing. Functional in a single build, rather than requiring
polymers react to outside influences such multiple production methods and additional
as heat, light or stress in a number of assembly. Australia’s Monash University
different ways, including changing shape (MU), along with its spinoff AMAERO
or color. Engineering, have gone further and
produced a jet engine with 3D printing.
“It was our chance to prove what we could do,” says Professor Xinhua Wu, the director
of the Monash Centre for Additive Manufacturing. “But when we reviewed the plans we
realized that the engine had evolved over years of manufacture. So we took the engine to
pieces and scanned the components. Then we printed two copies.”
MORE ➜ rapidreadytech.com/?p=8362
the market generated in 2012 will reach The three special topic project calls
The changes in the material act as
$20 billion by 2025, a CAGR of 22%. focus on closed-loop process control, open
a passive mechanical sensor that is
The report, “3D Printing 2015-2025: source protocols and non-destructive
capable of alerting onlookers to changes
Technologies, Markets, Players,” also evaluation of complex structures.
in material stress. It can be challenging
evaluates fast-growing sectors. MORE ➜ rapidreadytech.com/?p=8260
to integrate functional polymers into
According to the report, more than
objects produced through traditional
60% of 3D printing revenues come
manufacturing because the heat and
from mid-range printers in the $30,000 Autodesk’s Ember
pressure typical for many processes
would cause the functional polymer to
to $300,000 range, which are used
primarily for prototyping. That segment of
Explorer Edition
indicate prematurely.
Additive manufacturing (AM) works
the market, however, is experiencing the Goes on Sale
slowest growth due to application maturity. Autodesk has been a
at much lower temperatures than other big player in the CAD
manufacturing processes, making it a MORE ➜ rapidreadytech.com/?p=8245
market for nearly as
likely candidate for generating functional long as such a market
polymer objects. America Makes Awards has existed. The
MORE ➜ rapidreadytech.com/?p=8252
$3M in Funding advent of AM created
additional market
Leading 3D printing companies and
3D Printing Market: universities will share in more than $3
space for the company, and resulted
in new products designed specifically
$20 Billion by 2025 million in research funding via America
Makes and the Air Force Research
for AM. The one area of the 3D printer
The 3D printing market could reach $20 market Autodesk had previously left to
Laboratory.
billion in the next decade, according to other companies was hardware.
a report from IDTechEx. The company News that the company had plans to
forecasts that the $1 billion in revenues build its own AM system first broke last
year. Autodesk showed off a prototype
In December, America Makes
design, and announced plans to operate
announced the awardees of the three
on open source footing, labeling its
AFRL-funded Special Topic Project
forthcoming Ember as a development
Calls. Along with the National Center for
tool, rather than a dedicated
Defense Manufacturing and Machining,
manufacturing platform. Now, the Ember
the organization will award more than
Explorer Edition package has arrived and
$2.12 million in funding to the projects,
is available for sale.
with $998,000 in matching funds from
the project teams. MORE ➜ rapidreadytech.com/?p=8313
2X
to be a perfect solution for many design are considerations around net-
engineering teams tasked with running work computing and stor-
more advanced computer-aided engineering age resources in addition
(CAE) simulations in less time. As products to what kind of commu-
increase in complexity, simulations are The amount that product complexity nications bus can best
following suit. The large model sizes and multi- doubled between 1997 and 2012 support the target CAE
disciplinary workloads can be too demand- across all industries. More complex applications and work-
ing for existing hardware, including those products require more advanced loads. Additionally, there
high-performance workstations specifically simulations, which in turn require the are requirements specific
calibrated for engineering software. scalable processing power of high- to HPC environments—
Clusters are well positioned to drive HPC performance computing clusters.† for example, the proper
horsepower downstream, but there are still configuration and on-going
deployment challenges that the average small- to management of the job sched-
mid-size shop can’t handle without assistance. For uling software along with work-
example, proper configuration of an load management applications that
HPC cluster entails far more than ensure the environment runs at peak performance.
choosing the right processor HPC clusters provide an obvious path to more powerful
24%
and core count or specifying simulation studies, but not every company has the internal
enough memory. On the know-how to benefit from
hardware front alone, there that journey without an
80%
are many decisions to be expert guide. Specially
The percentage the made, from weighing the trained value-added
average product lifecycle benefits of a CPU-centric resellers, working
was shortened by between architecture to building out i n p a r t n e r s h i p
1997 and 2012. † a system that has a greater with key HPC The percentage of product design
reliance on GPU technology providers like HP decisions that small- and medium-
and memory, just to name a few. and CAE soft- sized businesses are responsible
ware specialists, for in their role as suppliers to
can deliver a fully larger corporations, according to
Professional Process integrated solution some industry accounts.
H
in conjunction with
P value-added reseller partners like Nor-Tech support services that
and Dasher Technologies follow a formal set of reduce HPC complexity
processes through each stage of deployment. and allow engineers to focus on
what they do best: innovating great products.
1. Following the customer assessment, the VAR will
make a recommendation for a specific HP HPC Get the Full Story
cluster design. Download the complimentary report, “Partnerships Remove
Complexity from Clusters,” sponsored by HP and produced
2. That cluster design will then be put through its paces by Desktop Engineering, at deskeng.com/de/vars for more
in a modified test environment to determine if it’s the information on how value-added resellers can help you
optimal configuration for that particular environment. deploy high-performance computing clusters.
The “Appification”
of Simulation
Mimicking the ease of use and specialization of popular
mobile apps may help expand the reach of simulation.
BY KENNETH WONG
M
ost of my digital photos end
up in one of two programs:
Adobe Photoshop or Ins-
tagram (now part of Facebook). I’ve
had Photoshop for five to six years. I
began using Instagram about a year and
a half ago. But these days I found my-
self using Instagram 80% of the time to
process my photos, and Photoshop the
other 20%.
Whether it’s a dramatic increase in
contrast, a highly saturated look or a
sepia-tone flush, I can get that in Insta-
gram with just a few touches. Sure, I can
get the same look in Photoshop, but it
means going step by step, experimenting
with the contrast and color sliders one at
a time until I arrive at the desired effect.
This offers a clue to how some compa-
nies are planning to broaden the reach
of software-based simulation, currently
the domain of experts.
On Apple’s App Store and Google
Play, you’ll find Autodesk ForceEffect.
ForceEffect Flow and ForceEffect Mo-
tion, three mobile apps that let you calcu-
late stress, visualize fluid and airflow, and
examine movements in mechanical struc-
tures without the burden and the learn-
ing curve of a general purpose simulation
program. In late 2013, Altair Engineer-
ing launched HyperWorks Virtual Wind
Tunnel and, more recently, HyperXtrude
in 2015, special programs built to simu- Altair’s HyperWorks Virtual Wind Tunnel (top) and HyperXtrude are two
late external aerodynamics and metal examples of simulation that is being customized as specialized applications.
extrusion. In October 2014, COMSOL Images courtesy of Altair.
Automation Features
There is now an additional burden on CAE vendors.
They’re expected to deliver not only general-purpose
www.eta.com
deskeng.com /// April 2015 DESKTOP ENGINEERING 15
Democratization of Simulation /// Software
programs that can solve a range of structural and fluid Workspace is designed to create templates graphically, with a
dynamics scenarios but also include tools that make tem- minimal amount of scripting.”
plate-publishing or workflow automation possible. San Francisco-based Rescale has built a business by
“Many of our products in the HyperWorks suite, for offering on-demand HPC infrastructure to companies
example SimLab, have template systems built right into that want to pursue large-scale simulation. But part of its
their tools. This is especially attractive for larger compa- value may be coming from the software layer that allows
nies with significant numbers of users, or companies that automation.
work with multiple vendors to complete their CAE pro- “As part of the Rescale toolset, we offer templates that
cess,” says Christopher Peterson, director of User Experi- let you set up a combination of software and algorithmic
ence at Altair. applications, so you can run design of experiments, Monte
Peterson also pointed out the difficulty of inventing Carlo algorithms, or optimization sessions. Once you set
targeted templates and apps. “Even within the same indus- up that workflow, it can be cloned so that you can change
try, modeling and analysis standards vary from company just a few parameters and rerun this job. The other popu-
to company. Bottom line, the applications we deliver are lar feature of ours is the ability to share the workflow that
customizable, a goal which is uniquely supported by Al- you have set up with other people,” says Joris Poort, CEO
tair’s open architecture,” he says. of Rescale.
ANSYS 16.0 comes preloaded with ACT templates, Design Automation Associates (DAA), an engineering
covering a wide range of wizards. “They are made in a way consultant, has made process automation its specialty. Ac-
that’s easy to develop (in XML and Python languages) and cording to John Lambert, DAA’s president and CEO, “It-
to deploy without the need for additional licenses. They erative problems occur in all areas of engineering design
enable organizations to easily repeat simulations, capture and analysis, but they especially occur in companies with
product and process knowledge, and reduce training and engineered-to-order and configured-to-order products,”
implementation barriers for non-expert simulation users,” says John Lambert, president and CEO of DAA.
ANSYS’ Reymond says. Finite element analysis (FEA) of a printed circuit board
The sole purpose of Comet Workspace from Comet So- (PCB) destined for use in an aerospace application, for
lutions is to rapidly and easily create automation templates, example, provides the ideal conditions for automation.
according to Malcolm Panthaki, founder and CTO of Comet DAA’s PCB analysis automation framework was built
Solutions. “While templates have been around for a while, on Siemens PLM (product lifecycle management) Soft-
they required a lot of scripting and programming, making ware’s NX. DAA automated the mesh generation and iter-
them expensive to create and maintain,” he says. “The Comet ative frequency extraction using NX’s common application
programming interface that supports
a number of popular programming
languages. Lambert estimated that
the automation cut down the analy-
sis that previously required 40 hours
to a mere 15 minutes. The efforts
required to set up the automation,
however, is considerable. “It takes ap-
proximately 10 times as long to create
a somewhat robust automation rou-
tine as it does to run a single itera-
tion, so not everything is appropriate
for automation,” he says.
In most cases, such process auto-
mations are nested inside a simula-
tion program; therefore, they require
the non-experts to have some rudi-
mentary knowledge of FEA software.
Comet’s Panthaki doesn’t think that
goes far enough. “Our experience
COMSOL’s Application Builder lets COMSOL Multiphysics software users turn their clearly tells us, however easy you
simulation models into apps, in a simpler interface suitable for use by non-experts. make those general purpose tools, the
Image courtesy of COMSOL. non-experts will still find it extremely
I
nnovations in the design and de-
ployment of high-performance
computing (HPC) hardware and
supporting middleware are paving
the way to new services and op-
portunities to improve engineering
simulation and analysis. Vendors and
customers alike are finding ways to
increase the number of simulations,
spend less money and still get results
faster than with traditional methods.
At the heart of this revolution is
not one innovation but several, creat-
ing what could be called a simulation
stack. You may be familiar with the
software term “stack” popularized by
the rise of open source software solu-
tions that have become foundational
in computing today. The best-known
stack is LAMP (Linux, Apache,
MySQL, PHP): four separate tech-
nologies that when used in tandem
become a synergistic force that make
today’s connected world possible. Rescale is a cloud simulation platform designed to make simulation easy
The emerging simulation stack WKURXJKDQLQWHJUDWHGRSWLPL]HGZRUNÁRZGULYHQVROXWLRQ6KRZQRQWKHVFUHHQ
is a trifecta of faster/cheaper/better, LVD&'DGDSFR67$5&&0VLPXODWLRQRIDQ2VSUH\WLOWURWRUDLUFUDIWUXQQLQJRQ
moving simulation further upfront 5HVFDOH·VVLPXODWLRQSODWIRUP Image courtesy of Rescale and CD-adapco.
into the design cycle and bringing to
reality the often-prophesied “democ-
ratization of simulation.” Eating the Dog Food projects for customers in a variety of in-
The simulation stack is still a There is a saying in the software industry: dustries. “We produce software, but we
fluid concept. The software and “eating our own dog food.” It started at are also a big consumer of it,” says Ravi
hardware varies from vendor to ven- Microsoft in the 1980s, when a manager Kunju, head of strategy and marketing
dor. Elements include cloud stor- told employees they needed to be using for Altair’s enterprise business unit. Over
age and computation, HPC clusters, Microsoft products whenever possible. the years Altair has built several HPC
virtualization technology and the Altair is no stranger to using its own data centers strategically placed around
use of GPUs (graphics processing engineering simulation solutions, hav- the globe. Creating each data center
units), either specifically for graphics ing launched as a software developer was a six-to-eight month process, Kunju
computation or for general-purpose in 1985. But Altair also offers consult- says, of specifying hardware compo-
computation. ing services, taking on complex CAE nents, choosing vendors, selecting CAE
SIMULATING SYSTEMS
FLOW − THERMAL − STRESS − EMAG − ELECTROCHEMISTRY − CASTING − OPTIMIZATION
REACTING CHEMISTRY − VIBRO-ACOUSTICS − MULTIDISCIPLINARY CO-SIMULATION
info@cd-adapco.com
www.cd-adapco.com
W
hen it comes to selecting a high-performance mark your model, and see the real-world impact. Finally, teams
computing (HPC) cluster, how can you ensure should consider working with a vendor who understands their
you’re picking the right system for your needs? solver applications, and can deliver a complete turnkey solution.
Desktop Engineering chatted with experts to find out the most
important aspects engineers should consider. Q: How should engineers determine cluster size?
Q: What are the most common HPC cluster miscon- A. Daninger: Available budgets for CAE simulation are an
ceptions you see? important consideration when determining cluster size. The
software licensing can often be 60-70% or more of the cost for
A. Dominic Daninger, vice president of Engineering, purchasing a CAE cluster. It is important to understand how the
Nor-Tech: Many potential HPC users view clusters as difficult customer models scale.
to setup and maintain. We also commonly see users who are
moving from the workstation CAE environment to an HPC A. Mach: Typically, common models engineers would run are
cluster environment who view and attempt to use the cluster as benchmarked on the proposed system to determine the optimal
just a bunch of workstations. They don’t understand the intel- number of CPUs to run based on a price/performance curve.
ligent job schedulers and resource managers that a cluster can Then we determine the mix of jobs they need to run, and the
add to the engineer’s toolkit. They miss the fact that a cluster target amount of work per day, to determine the optimal size.
can be used as a powerful shared resource and can run multiple
different CAE applications at the same time for different users. Q: Why would engineers choose an in-house private
cluster vs. a cloud computing solution?
A. Rod Mach, principal at TotalCAE: A common miscon-
ception is that cluster systems are too expensive. The increase A. Daninger: Intellectual property protection is one of the
in the amount of engineering work that can be done per month, key reasons that customers choose to go with an in-house pri-
when compared to the monthly cost to obtain that capability, vate cluster vs. a cloud solution. Another reason is very few
makes the ROI a no brainer. Another misconception is focusing cloud HPC offerings have InfiniBand fabric. Cloud solutions
on hardware as the only enabler, instead of the entire engineer- typically will offer 10G Ethernet, which has much longer la-
ing workflow required to make engineers more productive. tency times than current InfiniBand fabric.
Q: What are the top cluster considerations for design A. Mach: Private clusters have the following advantages over
engineering teams? public cloud computing solutions: There is no change to the
engineering workflow. There are no extra CAE licensing com-
A. Daninger: Some users don’t understand what applications plexities, all work can be done on the same central system. An
can be run on a distributed parallel computing machine, which on-premise professionally managed cluster is much cheaper for
a cluster is. They don’t understand which CAE applications they your baseline constant engineering computation needs. A pri-
need for their work. Many of our customers come to us after vate system is completely inside the corporate firewall, which
they have lost projects to their competition on a time-to-market for some organizations can address data governance and secu-
basis. They may not be using design simulation or if they are, rity concerns. A private cluster is highly reliable. CAE software
they may be doing it on workstations and waiting 72 hours for implicitly is designed with the assumption the underlying hard-
each solver simulation solution. ware, software and interconnects are highly reliable. DE
A. Mach: The first consideration is the impact to their product Jess Lulka is the associate editor of Desktop Engineering. You
if they were able to do more analysis per day. If each engineer can reach her at jess@deskeng.com.
can go from one simulation today to three or four in a single
workday, that makes the justification an easier sell to manage-
ment. Another consideration is to validate that your models and INFO ➜ Nor-Tech: nor-tech.com
solver will obtain speedup. Have your cluster vendor bench- ➜ TotalCAE: totalcae.com
Make Time
Top 5 ways desktop 3D printers speed
the engineering design cycle, resulting
in a rapid return on investment.
1
Reduce prototyping time and expenses. Instead of THE LATEST GENERATION: Includes the MakerBot®
outsourcing every prototype, a desktop 3D printer can Replicator® Desktop 3D Printer and the MakerBot
democratize design by allowing more engineers to test Replicator Z18 3D Printer. (left-right).
proof of concept, especially in the early stages of development.
2
Create better designs. The ability for design engi-
neers to 3D print at their desks allows them to try new “ The idea is speed. We build a concept, test it,
try it out, make mistakes, do corrections, and
are always pushing to go even faster. We try
”
ideas and make mistakes. Without real-time prototyp-
ing, the most innovative design may never be discovered. to go to 3D printers as soon as we can.
3
— Rick DeVos, senior consulting engineer,
Speed approvals. Hand a client or upper-level man-
agement a physical model to transform the design
GE FirstBuild
cycle. 3D printing speeds the design process by ending 3D Printing ROI
arguments and avoiding long meetings, leaving more time to
focus on the best ideas. Lead
Times
4
Ease of use increases productivity. Using the lat- 70-90%
est generation of MakerBot® Replicator® Desktop 3D
Printers allows design engineers to choose settings that
range from fast drafts to finer resolutions that don’t need 40-90%
postproduction. The printers’ large build volume, on-board
camera and diagnostics, and assisted build plate leveling ac- Savings
celerate prototyping. The printers’ Wi-Fi, USB and Ethernet
connectivity ensures a seamless production workflow that can MakerBot and Stratasys estimate that 3D printing can
be remotely monitored. realize a 40-90% reduction in lead times and a 70-90%
cost savings when used in the creation of jigs and fixtures.
5
Competitive advantage. Be faster out of the gate
with a design that has been prototyped and improved For more information, download the free white paper, Economics
multiple times by incorporating desktop 3D printing 101 for Desktop 3D Printing at deskeng.com/de/3Dprinting101,
into your design engineering workflow. produced by Desktop Engineering and sponsored by MakerBot.
T
he MakerBot® Replicator® Smart Extruder, is easy to swap and replace, mini-
mizing downtime by enabling you to quickly replace a worn extruder in minutes.
Its modular design lets you plan for the natural wear common to 3D printing
extruders and prepares you to quickly adapt to future innovations in the fast-evolving
world of 3D printing. It detects filament absence and automatically pauses your print.
It can even send notifications to MakerBot Desktop and MakerBot Mobile apps.
I
n the world of battery design for elec-
tric and hybrid electric vehicles (EV/
HEVs), temperature is everything.
Electrochemical reactions create heat.
Radiation and conduction distribute that
heat, components expand and change
contact, and hotspots trigger more elec-
trochemical reactions. This interwoven
behavior of chemical, electrical, me- Temperature distribution on an
chanical and fluid properties means that EV battery module. Calculations
designers must address thermal consider- performed with STAR-CCM+
ations with multiphysics simulation soft- multiphysics Battery System Module.
ware. Fortunately, such tools are more Sovani notes that thermal manage- Image courtesy of CD-adapco.
capable and connected than ever. ment is complicated because it is multi-
scaled, with the microscopic electro- the 3D-MSE feature. Second, the com-
At the Heart is the Cell chemical phenomenon affecting the pany provides Battery Design Studio
EV/HEV batteries are complex systems cooling strategy at the meter scale and (BDS), supporting simulation of Lithium-
comprising multi-element cells, multi- vice versa. From a simulation perspec- ion cells and cell-pack arrangements. This
cell modules and multi-module packs, tive, coupling the models across the scales package lets battery developers assess ma-
best analyzed with computer simulations. is a challenge; since users would like to terials (additives, electrolytes, separators)
Some software focuses on the details of run cycles that simulate, say, an hour of and components (cans, seals, headers,
cathode/electrolyte/anode design in cells, vehicle operation, standard CFD (com- spacers) for predicting current, voltage
some packages offer bi-directional mul- putation fluid dynamics) analysis runs and temperature. Users can fit simulated
tiphysics analysis across system compo- would take far too long. results to experimental data.
nents and still others take a mathemati- The ANSYS solution uses a reduced- Third, the STAR-CCM+ Battery Sys-
cal, equivalent-circuit approach to both order model (ROM) method to do a tem Module (BSM), which combines the
hardware and control-system design. detailed analysis at the smallest scale. electrochemical solver of BDS with the
Thermal management is crucial for the Translating these results into operational flow and thermal solver of STAR-CCM+,
capacity of the battery, as well as for safety. characteristics of the electrodes (values calculates the 3D thermal, fluid and elec-
“Temperature gradients can develop which are almost as accurate), the larger- trochemical cell-to-pack properties. It
in a battery pack, where one cell is hotter scale cooling channel model can be simu- can model standard layered cells or those
than another,” says Sandeep Sovani, direc- lated in much faster runs. The results are with a spiral geometry pattern, predict-
tor, Global Automotive Safety at ANSYS. verified by comparing one instance of the ing performance-using models defined as
“Internal currents develop; one cell starts ROM model to a full CFD run as well as physics-based or equivalent-circuit.
to charge another rather than sending the to data from lab experiments. Throughout the design process,
current to drive the vehicle. The car drives CD-adapco offers three approaches what’s key is the ability to account for
less [efficiently] because the cells are just to battery challenges. First, microscopic- non-constant heat generation during ac-
charging each other. Thermal manage- length-scale simulation is standard within tual vehicle operation. “When you drive
ment ensures that cells are evenly cooled.” the company’s STAR-CCM+ license as an EV/HEV vehicle, you accelerate, so
1D multiphysics model of a battery pack Learn More About the EV/HEV Battery World
instead of jumping right away into a 3D • Battery Design Studio Training Courses: cd-adapco.com/training and
CAD environment. “They say, ‘I don’t cd-adapco.com/webcasts
yet have a CAD model,’” says Hari Vi- • Advanced Automotive Battery Conference 2015: June 15 -19, Detroit,
jayakumar, director of business develop- advancedautobat.com/conferences
ment, MBSE Solutions, Siemens PLM • “Why Batteries Perform Poorly in Cold Weather”: COMSOL.com/blogs/
(product lifecycle management), “‘but I • “Driving the Future of Advanced Automotive Batteries”:
know I need to generate this amount of CD-adapco Dynamics magazine, March 2015
voltage, this should be the peak current • “What to Consider Before Deciding on the Right Li-ion Battery Software for
and I have a space constraint. Let’s try to Your Application”: ECPowerGroup.com/blog/
build a 1D multiphysical model of a bat-
tery pack with all my assumptions, and direction, users move to detailed 3D anal- tures all aspects of Li-ion batteries, from
see if my assumptions make sense.’” ysis. “Now you can run a co-simulation, performance to safety to system integra-
Cells are modeled in Amesim mostly where the physics justifies determining tion. The AutoLion suite targets three
by equivalent circuits; users then add me- 3D fields like distribution of temperature user groups: AutoLion-1D is for material
chanical, fluid and thermal aspects plus a in an enclosure,” says Sairam Prabhakar, developers and cell manufacturers, Auto-
battery control system. The result is a fast- thermal products manager for MAYA. Lion-3D supports cell and battery-pack
running 1D model of a battery operating “You can’t have one tool that does it all, so designers and AutoLion-ST supports the
inside a vehicle, seamlessly integrated with this is an open platform for multiphysics.” model-in-the-loop level needed for ve-
simulated controls. Thousands of such Newcomer EC Power stepped into hicle integration and control systems.
multiphysics models can run in an hour, this field in 2011 with a fresh look at
letting everyone quickly evaluate the qual- speeding up battery simulation. Its Au- Real-World Battery Use
ity of the proposed design. toLion thermal coupled battery (TCB) As with so many other kinds of prod-
Once Amesim identifies a good design modeling and virtual testing software cap- uct design, at some point engineers are
[analysis] is one of those areas more than ponent library that enables engineers battery system behaves in the entire (ve-
anything else in automotive that is funda- to incorporate physics-based predictive hicle) system,” says Bernardin. DE
mentally fragmented,” says Brad Heers, models of battery cells into multidomain
engagement manager, Transportation and models. What’s important about these Contributing Editor Pamela Waterman,
Mobility, SIMULIA. “So many pieces are models is that they’re not just about the Desktop Engineering’s simulation expert,
moving at the same time, and each one batteries but how they behave when de- is an electrical engineer and freelance techni-
uses a simplification to look at the other.” ployed in the vehicle when it is running. cal writer based in Arizona. You can send her
SIMULIA is open to supporting other “We have equivalent-circuit-based e-mail to DE-Editors@deskeng.com.
software within the Abaqus co-simulation models as well as models based on physi-
framework. “It’s important for customers cal and chemical reactions,” says Laurent
to use what they see as ‘best in class’ at Bernardin, executive vice president and INFO ➜ ANSYS: ansys.com
each stage, such as BDS software to give chief scientist, Maplesoft. “Both are able
➜ CD-adapco: cd-adapco.com
the charge and load,” says Heers. “Classic to run in real time. You can hook them up
Abaqus users then do the electro/ther- to a driving simulator, to a steering wheel ➜ COMSOL: comsol.com
mal/structural analyses, using the electri- and a gas pedal, and it will show how the ➜ EC Power: ecpowergroup.com
cal charge to derive Joule heating, which battery will respond in real time.” Input ➜ ESI Group: esi-group.com
results in thermal strain, which can cause parameters can come from FEA calcu-
changes in contact.” Results can also be lations (such as output from ANSYS or
➜ Maplesoft: maplesoft.com
input to a CFD code to investigate vent- Abaqus) or from experimental measure- ➜ MAYA: mayahtt.com
ing, with subroutines linking results. ments; results include what kind of energy ➜ Mentor Graphics: mentor.com
the battery will draw, what kind of heat
➜ MSC Software: mscsoftware.com
For a Different Point of View flow to expect, and how long the cells will
Maplesoft recently announced its Ma- last. “These days, too many different parts ➜ Siemens: siemens.com/plm
pleSim Battery Library, an add-on com- interact – it’s really critical to test how the ➜ SIMULIA: simulia.com
Register today for our free research report on the benefits of TotalCAE Private Cloud
Http://www.totalcae.com/privatecloud
halfpagead.indd 1 deskeng.com /// April 2015 DESKTOP ENGINEERING 29PM
10/13/2014 5:54:23
Focus on Energy Storage /// IoT
POWERING the
Internet of Things
How do engineers figure out a
way to run a massive network of
wireless sensors?
BY MARK CLARKSON
T
he Internet of Things (IoT) will be millions or bil-
lions of wireless sensors, monitoring everything
from doors and windows to air quality and soil pH.
It won’t all plug into the wall, so how will we power it?
We’ve been conditioned to think of computing prog-
ress in terms of ever greater horsepower – megabytes
moved, or millions of triangles drawn and shaded – but
that’s not the only path we can go down.
“The good news,” says Brendan Richardson, CEO,
PsiKick, “is we’re moving away from dependence on
An electromechanical harvester for kinetic power.
Moore’s law.” PsiKick is creating a full system on chip:
Image courtesy of EnOcean.
MCU, analog front end, power management, radio and
memory on a single piece of silicon.
“Most of these embedded sensors and nodes won’t 300 million batteries every day of every year.”
need a 7nm system with a billion gates,” says Richard- Clearly that won’t work. Can we build a sensor plat-
son. “Performance is not the driver anymore. The sharp form that doesn’t depend on a battery? Yes, says Richard-
end of the stick is going to be power efficiency. The next son, “but to get there we have to look at a power budget
big volume driver for the IC (integrated circuit) industry that can live on ambient harvested energy – somewhere
will be achieving the lowest joule per operation on your in the tens of microwatts.”
silicon. That’s the lens we look at the world through.”
Harvesting Power
300 Million Batteries a Day How about generating your operating power onboard
Sure, you can slap in some batteries to power some Inter- the sensor itself? EnOcean specializes in switch and
net of Things devices, but batteries have a limited lifes- sensor networks that are wireless and self-powered. No
pan. Even sitting on a shelf, they’ll lose charge over a few wires, no batteries. “As the [volume of sensors] increases,
weeks, months or years. I if they’re rechargeable, you can many people foresee the issues associated with access-
only recharge them a limited number of times. They’re ing and changing batteries as quite an impediment to
big. They’re heavy. And they have a disproportionate ef- the rapid adoption of this Internet of Things,” says Jim
fect on the final form factor of any product that includes O’Callaghan, president, EnOcean. “So EnOcean special-
them. But it’s worse than that. izes in generating the energy for powering a switch or
The next few decades will see deployment of hundreds sensor right at the switch or sensor. For instance, we have
of billions – maybe trillions – of independent, wirelessly a little inductive harvester that, when you press a switch
connected devices. “If you had a trillion sensors,” says that couple of millimeters, snaps a magnet through a coil
Richardson, “and each sensor had a 10-year battery at- and generates a pulse of energy sufficient to send a radio
tached to it […] you would still need to change nearly signal a hundred feet, through a few walls.” Simple elec-
Solid-State Sensing
The building control market is extremely interested in
this kind of capability, to save energy – and money – by
intelligently controlling temperature and ventilation.
“The problem designers have is finding the transduc-
ers that measure temperature or whatever, that are low
enough power for the amount of energy that you can cre- Miniaturized solar cells for light power.
ate,” says Bob Smith, technical director of Pressac Sens- Image courtesy of EnOcean.
ing. Case in point: carbon dioxide (CO2).
“The building control industry has [wanted] to deploy CO2
sensors with wireless communication systems that could trans- sistor. And that leakage is correlated to the input voltage;
mit data from buildings to control ventilation. The problem was that is, you can modulate it. You can still do useful work
that CO2 sensors were too power hungry,” says Alan Hender- with that transistor, even though you’re working at voltages
son, managing director of Gas Sensing Solutions (GSS). where it’s nominally turned off.
GSS came up with a unique, solid-state solution using The subthreshold region is noisy and finicky and not
LED emitters shining on photodiode receivers. “The especially well understood. So why bother? “When you
magic recipe for this,” says Henderson, “is that we tune operate a circuit in the subthreshold region, the [power
both the LEDs and the photodiodes to the absorption consumption] is reduced and the circuit slows down,”
waveband of CO 2. That means there are no filters, and says David Wentzloff, vice president of Engineering,
you’re using solid state technology which is very robust, PsiKick. “If you run a processor in the subthreshold
has a very long life, and runs at very, very low power.” region, you’re not going to clock it at 3GHz like the
GSS’s technique isn’t limited fundamentally to CO 2. processor in your laptop or your phone, but at 3MHz
The company runs its own facility to grow LEDs and or maybe 300KHz. We’re going to slow it down by a
photodiodes, and can tweak the process to create detec- thousand times or 10 thousand times. But the energy that
tors tuned for, say, carbon monoxide or methane, if the it consumes decreases quadratically – with the voltage
market is there. “It’s not a trivial exercise,” says Hender- squared.” Reduce your voltage from, say 1.8v to 0.6v, and
son. “There has got to be a business case behind it.” your overall energy consumption drops by a factor of 9.
GSS’s CO 2 detector is mainly used in building auto- “Provided I can still complete my task in the given
mation, but can also found in shipping containers, green- time,” says Wentzloff, “operating subthreshold is the
houses and incubators. “It’s very simple to use,” says most energy-efficient thing to do, in terms of how many
Henderson. “You just plug it into any wireless system.” joules [it takes] to complete a given task.”
Subthreshold operation is transparent above the circuit
Subthreshold Operations level. “At the logic level and above,” says Wentzloff, “the
Another opportunity to save power lies in the arcane software is unaffected by subthreshold operation. Mean-
realm of “subthreshold” circuit operation. ing you could run, for example, Linux on a subthreshold
A transistor is like a switch. When you apply a volt- processor, just more slowly than at typical voltages.”
age to the input gate, the transistor turns on, allowing Sadly, you can’t take an off-the-shelf microcontroller and
current to flow from the source to the drain. Reduce the reduce its operating voltage to achieve spectacular power
input voltage below a certain threshold and the transistor savings; it will just fail. A working subthreshold circuit must
turns off, stopping the flow of current. be designed and built, from the ground up, specifically to op-
In reality, the operation of transistors isn’t quite so bi- erate at subthreshold voltages. Not many people understand
nary. If the input voltage is slightly below the cutoff thresh- how to do it. Not everyone is convinced the technology is
old, there is still some current leaking through the tran- ready for production.
Growing Confidence
“There’s been some nervousness in the [building manage-
ment] industry about wireless products, because of past per-
formance,” says Pressac’s Smith. “Five years ago, if you put
a battery in a sensor, you accepted that you’re going to have
to put a new battery in it in a year’s time. But the reliability
and the lifetime of wireless products is superb now. The en-
ergy harvesting and battery technology is so good, and power
consumption so low, through technical innovation by people
like Gas Sensing and EnOcean, that manufacturers like Pres-
sac can make complete sensing solutions that are, in effect,
A DC/DC converter for thermal power. maintenance-free.” DE
Image courtesy of EnOcean.
Consortium Tackles
Materials Data Challenge
AutoMatIC aims to develop automotive industry-specific standards and best
practices for organizing, managing and sharing critical materials data.
BY BETH STACKPOLE
T
he steel and auto in-
dustries have long
been inextricably
tied. Pittsburgh counts De-
troit among its most prolific
customers. But with regula-
tors calling for higher emis-
sions standards in the com-
ing years, car makers have
been steadily adding alter-
native materials like carbon
fiber composites and alumi-
num to the mix, loosening
their ties to steel and ramp-
ing up materials programs
as part of competitive busi-
ness strategy.
The heightened focus on
materials has opened the door
to the Automotive Material
Intelligence Consortium (Au-
toMatIC), a new collaborative effort tasked with helping auto A key AutoMatIC goal is to provide a standard view of
OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) and suppliers make materials across all stages of design and engineering.
the most out of materials information and develop best practices. This screenshot showcases Granta’s MI:Materials
Spearheaded by materials information expert Granta Design, Gateway for Siemens NX — a window into a company’s
along with five automotive industry founding members, the Au- materials specifications directly within CAD.
toMatIC takes a page from similar efforts in the aerospace sector Images courtesy of Granta Design.
to improve how materials data is organized and managed. By cre-
ating standard methods of storing and sharing materials-related
data, the goal is to open up new avenues for automotive design materials into next-generation vehicles. Ford Motor Co., for
engineers who have limited experience with the properties and example, made headlines with the redesign of its best-selling
behaviors of non-traditional materials. F150 pick-up truck, which features an all-aluminum body
“The auto industry has been using different materials for to achieve a weight savings of 700 pounds over its all-steel
a long time, but they’ve never really had the strategic impor- predecessor. Still in the experimental stages is the multi-ma-
tance that they’ve gotten over the past few years,” says Dan terial lightweight vehicle (MMLV), a project between Ford
Williams, product management and marketing manager at and Magna International Inc. to create a concept vehicle that
Granta Design, which markets Granta MI, a materials infor- employs advanced materials in different areas of the car to
mation management system. achieve a nearly 25% weight reduction compared to the 2013
A look at some of the industry’s marquee projects illus- Ford Fusion, the production vehicle upon which it is based.
trates how far car companies have come melding alternative There’s also BMW, which has made significant investments in
agreeing to how this data should be shared, we’re not encourag- Beth Stackpole is a contributing editor to Desktop Engineer-
ing them to share competitive or sensitive data,” he says. ing. You can reach her at beth@deskeng.com.
The data sharing standards and best practices would tran-
scend multiple layers, from the data security and collabora-
INFO ➜ AutoMatIC: GrantaDesign.com/automotive/
tion best practices related to IT infrastructure, all the way
consortium.htm
through how to store and specify materials information re-
➜ Ford: Ford.com
lated to composites, fabrics, lightweight alloys, and welding ➜ Granta Design: GrantaDesign.com
and joints. Standardizing how this information is managed and ➜ Jaguar Land Rover: JaguarLandRover.com
stored facilitates integration with other core design software
For more information on this topic, visit deskeng.com.
like simulation, PLM (product lifecycle management), CAD,
etc., Williams says.
Linking materials data to core CAD and CAE tools and
gaining input to accelerate its own materials data management
efforts are the primary reasons Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) is on-
board with AutoMatIC, says Dr. Mark Blagdon, materials char-
acterization technical specialist for the firm, which is a user of
Granta’s MI materials information management platform.
“We need quicker and more robust distribution of the de-
sign data via tighter integration between Granta MI and our
PLM system and CAE pre-processor,” Blagdon says. “This
will be a common issue for other automotive OEMs so I hope
we can use our collective voice to aid in prioritizing the devel-
opment of these tools.”
While JLR has invested a lot of time and money into de-
veloping a materials management strategy around Granta MI,
there is a sharp learning curve in understanding how to store
data, Blagdon says. The hope is the consortium’s efforts can
accelerate the process — for example, using the output from
the “joining schema” workgroup to use as a base point for
JLR’s own joint properties database.
“By sharing knowledge and collaborating on common da-
tabase schema and tools with other members will assist in our
return on that investment,” he says. “I have seen some excel-
lent presentations by other members that has widened my un-
derstanding of how we could use the Granta MI tool to assist
with JLR’s wider data management needs.”
AutoMatIC members don’t have to be Granta MI users,
although currently all founding members do have materi-
als management efforts underway using the software. Wil-
SPECviewperf 12 higher
catia-04 100.40 98.53 38.19 34.81 42.23 n/a
SPECviewperf 11 higher
Shaded with Edges Mode 10.30 8.69 6.41 5.45 5.79 4.04
Composite
RealView Disabled 5.37 5.28 4.39 3.70 4.08 3.35
Composite
CPU Composite 4.87 4.50 4.18 3.70 3.12 4.15
Numbers in blue indicate best recorded results. Numbers in red indicate worst recorded results.
Exploration, Optimization
and Iterative Design
The industry is seeing new breakthroughs in
software platforms to help teams generate
more ideas in early-stage design.
BY BRIAN ALBRIGHT
T
he beginning of the design process can involve as tion and HPC capabilities, although not all engineering
much as art as science, and a lot of trial and error. In teams and managers understand the difference between
the past, the ability of engineers to explore the design the two concepts.
space and come up with optimal solutions has been limited Exploration takes place early in the process, as engineers
by time, computing resources and even the experience of the grapple with defining the functional parameters of a product.
design team. “Design exploration is used to understand the relationships
Technology is changing that. Specifically, design explora- between inputs to design systems and outputs, and to under-
tion and optimization strategies, combined with high-per- stand the physics of the problem you are trying to solve,” says
formance computing (HPC), can help engineers make faster Fatma Kocer, business development director at Altair. “It can
decisions about key design criteria, run through and eliminate be used to sample the design space to create analytical func-
more iterations faster, and reduce the amount of manual labor tions and do faster trade-off studies.”
required during all phases of design. The term “optimization” can refer to numerical optimi-
“Traditional product development and conceptual design is zation that takes place at the beginnning of a design to help
very frequently based on engineering intuition, which is great lead engineers down the correct path, topology/structural
if you have a well-understood problem that has been more or optimization that focuses on specific elements of a model
less solved,” says Bruce Jenkins, president of Ora Research. — often to balance material placement vs. loads, for exam-
“But if you require fundamental innovation in the conceptual ple, and even software that streamlines multi-disciplinary
engineering phase, these tools can be of great value. These are design workflows.
situations in which the best solutions may lie far outside of the Adding to the confusion is that the various optimization
experience envelope of the engineers.” technologies are sometimes referred to as design exploration,
though they are actually a subset of that process.
Exploration vs. Optimization “Design exploration is an umbrella,” says Bob Ryan, presi-
Design exploration and optimization are two parts of the dent of Red Cedar Technology, “and you can think of optimi-
design process that have benefited greatly from automa- zation as being underneath it.”
T
he sun was streaming into the Herbst Pavilion at San derserved segment frustrated with over-complicated software
Francisco Fort Mason, the site of Autodesk REAL 2015 packages. He’s going after the makers, hobbyists, tinkerers and
Conference (February 25-26). Ezra J. Spier and his col- DIYers — the uninitiated who are just like him.
leagues from Other Machine Co. (OMC) set up their booth by Coffland came up with OpenSCAM, which stands for
a window looking out to the Golden Gate Bridge. The machine Open-Source Simulation and CAM. The name was originally
on display was a portable desktop CNC (computer numerically an off-the-cuff joke to the hacker community; but now that
controlled) machine, roughly the size of a beer cooler. It’s called it has become a more serious piece of software, he plans to
the Othermill, priced at $2,199. change it. In the process of developing his 3-axis CNC pro-
Holding an exquisite piece of wood with mother of pearl gram, he also learned a lot about the commercial CAM titles
inlay, Spier explained, “Our machine works with wax, plastic, available in the market.
rubber, wood, aluminum, brass, copper — anything softer than These new players’ outreach efforts are indicative of the
steel,” says Spier, OMC wants to bring CNC to people who coming of a different breed of CAM software, characterized by
don’t have training in manufacturing or machining. “To make a simpler interface and a smaller set of functions. Established
that happen, we built our own software,” he says. In line with the CAM vendors who target a different market feel the pressure to
company’s brand, the software is dubbed Otherplan. make CAM easier, more accessible and more affordable.
Joseph Coffland is someone else who hopes to bring CAM
to a new community. By his own admission, Coffland had little Milling for the Other People
to no experience with commercial CAM programs. He felt that OMC manufactures its milling machine domestically in the
made him the ideal person to develop a program for the un- U.S. It’s headquartered in San Francisco’s Mission District, a
WORKSTATIONS
said, “With our software, it’s very easy to do 2D cuts or build
PCBs. Typically, you need to do complicated things to get your
toolpaths for PCB. With our software, all you have to do is load
your design file,” he says.
Spier doesn’t see a distinction between professional and
maker markets. OMC wants to cater to both. The more impor-
tant trend to note is the changing definition of manufacturing
itself. “We see the future of manufacturing not as bigger facto-
ries but as smaller ones and neighborhood operations. So we
want to build a machine that cuts with factory-level precision,
but runs on a much smaller scale,” he says.
Open-Source CAM
Coffland may be new to CAM, but not to software develop- Millions of FREE CAD Models
ment. He operates Cauldron Development LLC, a software The fastest way to model
engineering business. a part is to download it!
“I’m not trying to compete with the existing CAM pack- · Millions of supplier certified models
ages,” he says. “My software focuses more on accomplishing · All CAD formats, all FREE
basic tasks, without burdening it with the advanced features
experts might want.” For example, cutting text into solids — ™
one of the often-requested functions among the maker com-
munity — is often not supported or is overly complicated in
professional CAM programs. For those who create in 3D
Coffland acknowledges the current open-source CAM soft-
ware choices — including his — cannot compete with com-
www.3DX-US.com
mercial packages when it comes to supporting the needs of
traditional manufacturers. “Most commercial operations are
running on commercial software,” he said. “But it’s not out of
the question. The key is figuring out a way to fund the open-
ARTICLE REPRINTS
source movement. It takes a lot of time and effort to develop
Expand Your Industry Exposure
Simulation & Analysis /// Composites
ing the export plybook with flat patterns of the plies to be manu-
factured. All partners involved in this process can exchange data.
In addition, as a pre- and post-processor, Laminate Tools in-
terfaces with standard CAD and FEA applications to produce
composite-specific results. It also offers an embedded interface
are deeply embedded in CATIA V5, Abaqus/CAE, SolidWorks
and Femap, and allow users to define plys on individual finite ele-
ments, reflecting the actual manufacturing process.
As an example of its power, you could define a part with 200
plies, then with the push of a button automatically generate 2,000
East Coast:
“Commercial vendors tend to offer a dumbed down ver-
with Solidworks, Nastran and ANSYS, as well as with Anaglyph’s laminate properties—a task impossible to do by hand.
hand layup ply-placement software, PlyMatch.
sion to beginners, in the hope that they can ask you to pay
of layup schedules. ment in specifying these materials, the software developers are
Simulayt’s solutions for the composites field have been in right there, expanding their support. DE
Midwest/West Coast:
continuous development for 20 years. As the developer of Layup
Technology, which incorporates advanced fiber simulation and Contributing Editor Pamela Waterman, DE’s simulation expert, is
ply modeling capabilities, the company is positioned to offer soft- an electrical engineer and freelance technical writer based in Arizona.
ware tools running in both CAD and CAE systems. The products You can send her e-mail to DE-Editors@deskeng.com.
more for the professional version. That tends to turn off the Reprinted from May 2011 Desktop Engineering with adaptations.
Copyright© by Level 5 Communications, Inc., 1283 Main St., Dublin, NH 03444, All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this topic, please visit deskeng.com.
Chris Casey • 847-247-5476 • ccasey@deskeng.com
makers,” Coffland says. He hopes his OpenSCAM will mature
6 DESKTOP ENGINEERING May 2011 /// deskeng.com
celebrating 25 years
as the authority on
RAPID is known worldwide as the preeminent event for 3D printing, scanning,
and additive manufacturing. At RAPID 2015, we will be celebrating our 25th
anniversary as the ultimate authority, with the most comprehensive display
of 3D technology, expertise, and innovation ever showcased in one place.
Experience the latest advances – hands on – and explore the unlimited
possibilities of how 3D technology can improve your business.
produced by
12/3/14 45
9727.indd 2
deskeng.com /// April 2015 DESKTOP ENGINEERING 4:09 PM
Editor’s Picks by Anthony J. Lockwood
Each week, Tony Lockwood combs through dozens of new products to bring you the ones he thinks will
help you do your job better, smarter and faster. Here are Lockwood’s most recent musings about the
products that have really grabbed his attention.
TO APP
Verify and Optimize your Designs The Application Builder provides you with
tools to easily design a custom interface
Product Suite
› COMSOL Multiphysics®
› COMSOL Server™
© Copyright 2014-2015 COMSOL. COMSOL, COMSOL Multiphysics, Capture the Concept, COMSOL Desktop, COMSOL Server, and LiveLink are either registered trademarks or
trademarks of COMSOL AB. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners, and COMSOL AB and its subsidiaries and products are not affiliated with, endorsed by,
sponsored by, or supported by those trademark owners. For a list of such trademark owners, see www.comsol.com/trademarks