Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Echo Lake V DeLoatch NCOPM Amicus (1.19.21)

    Uploaded by

    rick siegel
    54 views11 pages
    Amicus letter submitted by National Conf. of Personal Managers asking the court to follow DeLoatch's alternative request, that the parties be asked to fully brief the vagueness and penalty provision issues. Letter corrects the record that DeLoatch's Objection filing got wrong: explaining what courts in the past had in fact discussed and decided, versus what DeLoatch's filing said they determined.

    Original Title

    Echo Lake v DeLoatch NCOPM Amicus[1.19.21]

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Amicus letter submitted by National Conf. of Personal Managers asking the court to follow DeLoatch's alternative request, that the parties be asked to fully brief the vagueness and penalty provision issues. Letter corrects the record that DeLoatch's Objection filing got wrong: explaining what courts in the past had in fact discussed and decided, versus what DeLoatch's filing said they determined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    54 views11 pages

    Echo Lake V DeLoatch NCOPM Amicus (1.19.21)

    Uploaded by

    rick siegel
    Amicus letter submitted by National Conf. of Personal Managers asking the court to follow DeLoatch's alternative request, that the parties be asked to fully brief the vagueness and penalty provision issues. Letter corrects the record that DeLoatch's Objection filing got wrong: explaining what courts in the past had in fact discussed and decided, versus what DeLoatch's filing said they determined.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 11

    MC-030

    A.TTOR!EYOR PA.~~
    YITT'HCVT S..S. ~ . r.,,$ FOR COt.f,'T USE ONl y
    "\,._ ' A'-._1"
    . 0 " ' - • .., \ l( "f s
    '- ~a.* ('..,,.(cr \-~r ~,-....((\h, 1'jc6
    y cP.;,o ;. "')6~ 68 ~ ((.- oOO S
    He. Vl'.i c, So }- v
    lt> - -.n1 1110
    (g) '2A_<"¼ tA.\:~Zi- coPY
    c o NFORME0 !LED .
    E......._ AC0RESS
    ATTOR>EY FOR ~
    ~ - fl (,;. O{
    TB.EPHalE NO.c
    1,1\ L'\ • 11<-
    ORIGINAL
    surcrior
    r Calitomla
    C<ffO:: 1>,ngetes
    SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF OOJ~N l B 1011
    s=n AllOREss: LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT
    MAUNG AOOREss: NORTHWEST DISTRICT · EAST BLDG. _ Executive Qfficer/C\elk ol Court
    CITYA>EZPC<XlEc
    6230 SYLMAR AVE. ROOM 107
    Shem R. Carte£,
    SRANCHNAMEc BY: Michael J. Estorga, Oe,iuty
    VAN NUYS. CA 91401
    PLAINTIFFIPET!TIONER'z d--..• ' - " ' - - ~ v
    ' '\'°"'-i L.L ( ..,, M-c7 .,,<....oc..T c;~
    DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: M L<, V-t. ~TL~
    CASE NUMBER:

    DECLARATION
    -L-\ V Z: e,Q M2.,t,
    o._vt,l..{CU"s l ette , .-

    I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
    Date:

    [TYPE OR PRINT NAME)

    D Attorney for D Plaintiff D Petitioner D Defendant


    ;;;:;== = == = = = = = = = = = = = = == == = ; i ; ~esponaent::;~ =otne4 Specify);.~~~-;;;
    rccl-S
    ;:;;;\:~ =====;;;;;

    Form Approved ror Optlonal Use


    Judicial Council of caltfomia DECLARATION Pag•1 of1
    MC-030 (Rev. January 1, 2006)

    You might also like