Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract,
Bangkalan coastal style hand-drawn batik is a regional leading creative industry that has
experienced difficulties in industrial development during the Covid-19 pandemic. Because
marketing relies more on direct interaction with buyers, social distancing policies, Large
Scale Social Restrictions (or PSBB), and Enforcement of Restrictions on Community
Activities (or PPKM) also impacted the decline in sales volume. To survive, innovation
strategies are needed to increase competitive advantage. This study aims to analyse the
innovation strategy, which includes product innovation, marketing, technology, and
cooperation to increase competitive advantage. Data were collected through in-depth
interviews, observation, and documentation. The results indicate that innovation strategies
can increase competitive advantage, and hand-drawn batik SMEs have enormous
development potential. Government intervention affects Small and Medium-sized Enterprise
(SMEs), in this case, Bangkalan coastal style hand-drawn batik, to be able to carry out
various innovations.
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
a. Definition of Innovation
METHODOLOGY
This research was a qualitative descriptive phenomenological research. The
population is the entire unit of characteristics or measurement results that are the object
of study in an area that meets specific requirements related to research problems [15].
The research population was the owners of the batik industry, craftsmen, the Department
of Industry and Manpower, the Department of Cooperatives, SMEs in Bangkalan
Regency, and the Bangkalan Batik Entrepreneurs and Craftsmen Association
(PERABEN). Data were collected through in-depth interviews, triangulation [16], expert
surveys, and reputable international journals, which were analysed descriptively-
qualitatively.
RESULTS
This study aimed to analyse innovation strategies to increase the competitive
advantage of the Bangkalan coastal style hand-drawn batik industry during the Covid-19
pandemic [17]. The findings of this research resulted in 3 essential points: 1) the factors
that influence the success of innovation, 2) the effect of product innovation on market
driving, and 3) the influence of innovative strategies to increase competitive advantage.
A similar opinion was also expressed by an informant who owns Tresna Batik
SMEs, Ibu Supik. Informants provide answers as it is, which essentially is as follows:
Regarding innovation, sir, I myself have made various innovations. Innovation
is indeed important, especially in business and at work. Innovation is vital to
achieve the goals we aspire to. Like that, sir. Batik is also an innovation, for
example; usually, the colour of batik is yellow, now I make other colours.
Innovation is made for better production. Then, besides that, there are also
innovations in terms of service, quantity, quality, and others. I’ve been doing
that for a long time, sir. But, now, during the pandemic, whatever innovation is
like, the impact is not what it used to be. (S/SMEs Tresna Batik/29/5/21/12.00-
14.00).
Another opinion that supports that innovation can support competitiveness was
also stated by the owner of Ataya Batik SMEs, Mrs. Gina, who said that:
Maybe the motive, sir. We are always trying to find new motives. You see,
consumers are often looking for new motifs. However, if we add new motifs,
we are also still trying to maintain the Madura characteristic of batik. We are
also trying contemporary motifs, sir. Sometimes the Madura motif is bright in
colour, so to make innovations, we try softer colours. Currently, the trend is
softer motifs for young people. However, if the Madura motif is changed, it
cannot be changed to another motif, which allows the new colour change.
From bright red, green, blue to softer colours. (G/ Ataya Batik/29-
05/2021/14.00-16.00).
The same opinion was also expressed by an informant who owns Pesona Batik
SMEs, Mrs. Mei, who stated as follows:
If we innovate, we must be able to create market driving, sir. We must have
high confidence that we can also move the market through our product
innovation. We can influence customers to like our products in the market. We
are not always only market-oriented but also must be able to drive the market.
Almost every week, the craftsmen and I produce new products with new
innovations that have high philosophical values. We hope to educate
customers to know more about batik, appreciate, and participate in preserving
batik as the culture of the Indonesian nation, which has high cultural values
and creativity. To facilitate market driving, Pesona Batik SMEs also has a
batik training centre for customers who want to learn to make batik. (M/P
Batik/15/4/21/12.00-14.00)
The market driving approach is a strategy that can influence market behaviour
to increase competitive advantage. Two factors encourage the creation of sustainable
competitive advantage, namely product innovation and market driving. Good
cooperation between the owners and craftsmen of hand-drawn batik SMEs, combined
with knowledge and skills, can create product innovation and market driving [25]. To
support market driving, hand-drawn batik SMEs has a batik training centre to serve
customers who want to learn batik. The process of transferring knowledge to
customers can also drive the market.
The study results echo the results of research conducted by Wuryanti Kuncoro and Wa
Ode Suriani, who examined the effect of product innovation on market driving and
sustainable competitive advantage. The results indicate that product innovation affects market
driving, market driving affects competitive advantage, and innovation affects competitive
advantage [31]. Eleonora Pantanoa, Constantinos-Vasilios Priporasa, and Nikolaos Stylosb
argue that patented innovation analysis affects competitiveness. Indeed, innovation results
must be patented so as not to be imitated by competitors and innovation is protected by law
[32]. In Indonesia, there is already a patent for hand-drawn batik, namely Batik Mark.
Wahyono and Benny Hutahayan analysed how SMEs adapt and further develop business
competencies, innovation, and performance by utilising market orientation, behavioural
orientation, learning, and financial literacy that can increase competitive advantage [33].
Fanny Hermundsdottir and Arild Aspelund analysed the relationship between sustainable
innovation and competitive advantage and identified contextual factors that moderated this
relationship. They found that there is a significant effect between continuous innovation and
increasing competitive advantage [34].
CONCLUSION
Knowledge, skills, talents, and experience, as well as events that are trending in
society, affect the emergence of creative ideas in making product and process innovations
that can increase competitive advantage. The factors that influence the success of innovation
are: 1) market-oriented innovation, 2) innovation to increase the added value of hand-drawn
batik SMEs, 3) efficient and effective innovation, 4) innovation that is in line with the vision
and mission of hand-drawn batik SMEs, and 5) innovation must be carried out continuously
and continuously.
The right and strategic innovation can increase market driving so that hand-drawn
batik SMEs can also move the market and educate customers to accept product innovations
and become loyal customers. There are four dimensions of innovation strategy: leadership
orientation, type of innovation, source of innovation, and level of investment. Furthermore,
there are five indicators of competitive advantage, namely product uniqueness, product
variety, price, reputation, and customer experience. Reputation and customer experience need
to be considered and carried out properly by the owners and craftsmen of hand-drawn batik
SMEs in Bangkalan to improve the development and progress of hand-drawn batik in
Bangkalan in particular and Indonesia in general. Government intervention is needed to
develop the creative hand-drawn batik industry in Bangkalan to become a driving force for
the regional economy. Innovation must also be carried out on an ongoing basis in order to
increase the competitive advantage and performance of hand-drawn batik SMEs.
References
[3] Udriyah, J. Tham, and S. M. Ferdous Azam, “The effects of market orientation and
innovation on competitive advantage and business performance of textile smes,”
Manag. Sci. Lett., vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1419–1428, 2019, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.009.
[6] Y. Yusof, R. Roddin, and H. Awang, “What Students Need, and What Teacher Did:
The Impact of Teacher’s Teaching Approaches to the Development of Students’
Generic Competences,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 204, no. November 2014, pp.
36–44, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.107.
[7] M. Kurkkio, “Managing the fuzzy front-end: Insights from process firms,” Eur. J.
Innov. Manag., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 252–269, 2011, doi: 10.1108/14601061111124911.
[8] K. Onufrey and A. Bergek, “Second wind for exploitation: Pursuing high degrees of
product and process innovativeness in mature industries,” Technovation, vol. 89, no.
February 2019, p. 102068, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2019.02.004.
[10] W. D. P. Masengi, E. Loho, and V. Tubagus, “Profil hasil pemeriksaan foto toraks
pada pasien pneumotoraks di Bagian / SMF Radiologi FK Unsrat RSUP Prof. Dr. R.
D. Kandou Manado periode Januari 2015 – Agustus 2016,” e-CliniC, vol. 4, no. 2, pp.
2014–2016, 2016, doi: 10.35790/ecl.4.2.2016.14397.
[12] A. El-kassar and S. Kumar, “Technological Forecasting & Social Change Green
innovation and organisational performance : The in fl uence of big data and the
moderating role of management commitment and HR practices,” Technol. Forecast.
Soc. Chang., no. November, pp. 0–1, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.016.
[14] Z. Chu, J. Xu, F. Lai, and B. J. Collins, “Institutional theory and environmental
pressures: The moderating effect of market uncertainty on innovation and firm
performance,” IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 392–403, 2018, doi:
10.1109/TEM.2018.2794453.
[15] F. J. Flowler, Survey research methods (5th ed.). California, CA: SAGE Publication
Inc. Retrieved from, 2013.
[16] M. B. Farooq, “Qualitative telephone interviews: Strategies for success,” 18th Annu.
Waikato Manag. Sch. Student Res. Conf. 2015, pp. 1–30, 2015.
[17] P. Mappigau and Hastan, “Core Competence And Sustainable Competitive Adventage
Of Small Silk Weaving Industries (SIs) In Wajo District, South Sulawesi,” Procedia
Econ. Financ., vol. 4, no. Icsmed, pp. 160–167, 2012, doi: 10.1016/s2212-
5671(12)00331-0.
[18] P. A. Sanistasya, K. Raharjo, and M. Iqbal, “The Effect of Financial Literacy and
Financial Inclusion on Small Enterprises Performance in East Kalimantan,” J. Econ.,
vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 48–59, 2019, doi: 10.21831/economia.v15i1.23192.
[19] J.-P. Huhtala, “Market orientation , innovation capability and business Insights from
the global financial crisis,” 2014, doi: 10.1108/BJM-03-2013-0044.
[23] P. Ghauri, F. Wang, U. Elg, and V. Rosendo-Ríos, “Market driving strategies: Beyond
localisation,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 5682–5693, 2016, doi:
10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.107.
[24] K. Storbacka and S. Nenonen, “Industrial Marketing Management Learning with the
market : Facilitating market innovation,” Ind. Mark. Manag., 2014, doi:
10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.009.
[27] M. Koszewska, “Circular Economy - Challenges for the Textile and Clothing
Industry,” Autex Res. J., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 337–347, 2018, doi: 10.1515/aut-2018-
0023.
[28] I. Hashi and N. Stojčić, “The impact of innovation activities on firm performance
using a multi-stage model: Evidence from the Community Innovation Survey 4,” Res.
Policy, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 353–366, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.011.
[30] W. J. Dennis Jr., “Raising Response Rates in Mail Surveys of Small Business Owners:
Results of an Experiment,” J. Small Bus. Manag., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 278–295, 2003,
doi: 10.1111/1540-627x.00082.
[33] Wahyono and B. Hutahayan, “The relationships between market orientation, learning
orientation, financial literacy, on the knowledge competence, innovation, and
performance of small and medium textile industries in Java and Bali,” Asia Pacific
Manag. Rev., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2020.07.001.