BAHASA MELAYU UNDANG-UNDANG II (BMU556)

SEMESTER OKTOBER 2021 – FEBRUARI 2022

TUGASAN BERPASANGAN

TAJUK TUGASAN :

ANALISIS KESALAHAN PADANAN MAKNA

DALAM TEKS TERJEMAHAN DAN KAEDAH TERJEMAHAN

TEKS SUMBER

Why some rape survivors don't fight back, remain cordial with attacker
By Aidila Razak

For a year after she said she was raped by her dance instructor in 2017, Nina continued to be his dance
partner. She maintained a cordial relationship, replied to his text messages as per normal and travelled
with him to a dance festival overseas, where they shared a hotel room. Nina said she was worried about
sharing a room with him, but complied because it was the only option provided by the festival
organiser. During the trip she remained vigilant, dodging him when he tried to kiss her, avoiding
drinking alcohol and staying awake so he would not attack her while she slept.

But her decision to remain his partner, her sustained friendship with him and decision to travel with
him that weekend were among issues scrutinised by police when she reported him for raping her in
2017. Eventually, police concluded the sex was “voluntary”. Nina is a pseudonym to protect her
identity. Malaysiakini is also not identifying the dance instructor, to avoid identifying his other alleged
victims. He did not respond to requests for comment.

No correct reaction

The behaviour of complainants in sexual assault cases are often scrutinised to verify a rape allegation,
but clinical psychologist Vizla Kumaresan (photo below) said investigators may be looking for the
wrong thing. There is a misconception that the “correct” reaction is to be hysterically afraid of the
perpetrator, but there is no one way to express trauma, she said.
Vizla said it is “not abnormal” for survivors to maintain normal relations with their perpetrators as a

BMU556 – TUGASAN BERPASANGAN OKT.2021 – FEB.2022

 form of self-preservation, especially if the perpetrator is someone known and close to them.

“It is difficult for them to reconcile that this bad thing has happened to them and it was committed by
someone they believe is good and respected,” Vizla said.
“From a victim’s perspective, after a traumatic incident it is very common for people to be confused
and not fully comprehend what is going on. So they think if I just be normal, then things will be okay,”
she said. Women’s Aid Organisation (WAO) executive director Sumitra Visvanathan said oftentimes,
a survivor’s reaction may seem counterintuitive to an external observer. “This may be a coping or
survival mechanism, in response to the shock and trauma of sexual assault. “The survivor may also
try to re-establish a sense of normalcy and thus may still be cordial with the perpetrator,” she said.

Self-blame as a form of self-preservation

According to the World Health Organisation (WHO), the “vast majority” of rape is perpetrated by
those known to the survivor. A United Nations study in Europe found that 67 percent of rapists were
known to the survivors. This data is unavailable for Malaysia, but WAO estimates about 80 percent
of survivors who seek its assistance said they were assaulted by someone they know.

Drawing from her experience working with survivors in a trauma clinic and domestic abuse shelter,
clinical psychologist Ng Siew Li said it is “not uncommon” for survivors to try to

“explain away” the attack as a one-off incident or by blaming the circumstances. They may also resort
to self-blame to believe it was something they could have controlled. “If you believe you have control,
you will believe that you can stop it from happening again,” she said.

For years after it happened, Nina said, she did not want to acknowledge that she was raped because
she was afraid of the consequences. “If I did, I would have to do something about it,” she said. The
instructor also told her it was the first time anything like that had happened. But two years later, she
learnt that other dancers were allegedly assaulted in the same way. It prompted Nina to report what
happened to her. The dancers who said they were raped by the instructor in an incident in July 2019
also filed police reports. The investigation for the 2019 incident is pending.

BMU556 – TUGASAN BERPASANGAN OKT.2021 – FEB.2022

TEKS SASARAN
aku rasa title betul
Mengapa ada mangsa rogol tak melawan, kekalkan hubungan dengan pelaku
Oleh Aidila Razak

Nina kekal menjadi pasangan tarian kepada jurulatih tarinya, setelah setahun dia berkata dirogol lelaki
itu pada 2017. Dia mengekalkan hubungan kordial dan membalas pesanan teks seperti biasa, dan
hubungan mesra
melancong ke festival tarian di luar negara. Di sana, mereka berkongsi bilik hotel yang sama. Nina
berkata dia bimbang berkongsi bilik tetapi terpaksa akur kerana itu saja pilihan yang diberikan
penganjur festival.

Sepanjang festival dia kekal berjaga-jaga, mengelak apabila lelaki itu cuba menciumnya, dan tidak
mengambil kesempatan
meminum alkohol dan kekal berjaga agar jurulatih itu tidak menyerangnya ketika dia tidur. Namun
keputusannya untuk kekal menjadi pasangan tari dan kawan, serta keputusan untuk ke luar negara
diteliti
selama beberapa hari dengannya antara isu yang direnung polis apabila dia membuat laporan pada
2017. Akhirnya polis menyimpulkan hubungan seks yang berlaku sebagai "sukarela". Nina ialah
gelaran yang digunakan untuk melindungi identitinya. Malaysiakini juga tidak menyatakan identiti
jurulatih tari itu. Dia tidak memberi maklum balas apabila dihubungi Malaysiakini.

Tiada reaksi yang betul

serangan seksual
Kelakuan pengadu dalam kes menyerang seksual sering diteliti untuk mengesahkan dakwaan rogol, tetapi
tanggapan yang
pakarsalah
psikologi Vizla Kumaresan (gambar) berkata pihak yang membuat siasatan mungkin tersilap
pandang. Ada salah tanggapan bahawa reaksi yang "betul" adalah untuk berasa takut yang amat sangat
terhadap pembuat, tetapi bukanlah satu-satunya cara yang khusus untuk menunjukkan rasa trauma, kata
Vizla. pelaku

Dia berkata bukan "abnormal" untuk mangsa mengekalkan hubungan dengan pelaku seperti biasa,
terutama jika pelaku itu seorang yang dikenali dan rapat dengan mereka. "Sukar untuk mereka menerima
perkara buruk ini terjadi kepada mereka dan dilakukan oleh orang yang dirasakan baik dan dihormati.
"Dari perspektif mangsa, selepas insiden traumatik, amat biasa untuk mereka menjadi keliru dan tidak
memahami sepenuhnya apa yang berlaku. Jadi mereka fikir dengan berkelakuan biasa, keadaan akan
okey," katanya. Pengarah Eksekutif Pertubuhan Pertolongan Wanita (WAO) Sumitra Visvanathan,
seperti biasa

BMU556 – TUGASAN BERPASANGAN OKT.2021 – FEB.2022

 bertentangan
berkata sering kali reaksi mangsa mungkin nampak tidak sama firasat di mata pemerhati luar. "Hal ini
mungkin mekanisme untuk menghadapi apa yang berlaku, sebagai maklum balas kepada kejutan dan
reaksi/respon
trauma serangan seksual. "Mereka (mangsa) mungkin juga cuba mewujudkan semula keadaan yang
normal dengan cara masih mengekalkan hubungan dengan pelaku," katanya lagi.

Salahkan diri sendiri salahkan diri sebagai satu bentuk pemeliharaan diri

Menurut Pertubuhan Kesihatan Dunia (WHO), "majoriti besar" kes rogol dilakukan oleh individu yang
dikenali mangsa. Kajian PBB di Eropah mendapati 67 peratus perogol ialah orang yang dikenali mangsa.
Tiada data untuk kes di Malaysia, tetapi WAO menganggarkan kira-kira 80 peratus mangsa yang
mendapatkan bantuannya berkata mereka diserang oleh orang yang dikenali. Mengambil pengalaman
berhubung dengan mangsa di klinik trauma dan pusat perlindungan penyalahgunaan domestik, ahli
psikologi Ng Siew Li berkata "tidak pelik" untuk mangsa cuba "menjelaskan" serangan sebagai peristiwa
"one-off" atau menyalahkan keadaan. Mereka juga mungkin menyalahkan diri sendiri untuk percaya
"sekali dalam hidup"
bahawa perkara itu ialah sesuatu yang boleh mereka kawal, katanya. "Jika anda percaya anda ada
kawalan, anda akan percaya mampu menghalangnya daripada berulang," katanya lagi.

Menurut Nina, bertahun selepas kejadian, dia tidak mahu mengakui bahawa telah dirogol kerana takut
dengan kesannya. "Jika saya akuinya, saya perlu lakukan sesuatu tentangnya," katanya. Jurulatih tari itu
turut memberitahunya bahawa itulah kali pertama perkara seumpama itu berlaku. Namun dua tahun
diserang/dirrogol (?)
kemudian, dia dapat tahu ada penari lain yang menyebut kena serbu dengan cara yang sama. Ia
menyebabkan Nina membuat laporan terhadap kejadian yang menimpanya. Beberapa penari yang
berkata mereka dirogol oleh jurulatih itu pada Julai 2019 turut membuat laporan polis. Siasatan untuk
insiden itu masih tidak selesai.
belum selesai (?) (Dipetik dan disesuaikan daripada:
https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/509930)

BMU556 – TUGASAN BERPASANGAN OKT.2021 – FEB.2022