RTC – Branch 10, Malaybalay City

Presiding Judge: Hon. Eldred Donggal Cole

Date: August 19, 2021 (8:30 PM – 11:30 PM)
Title
Crim. Case No. 34519-19P
People vs Herbert Nietes
re: Violation of RA 10591
Status Details
Arraignment  The counsel of the accused manifested
that the accused has already been
informed of the charges against him
and hereby waives the reading of the
information.
 The accused has pleaded not guilty of
the charged against him.
 The accused will sign the waiver when
he come for the preliminary
conference.

Crim. Case No. 36532-21P Arraignment  The information was read before the
People vs Wilfredo Pares, et. al. accused with assistance of his counsel.
re: Murder He pleaded not guilty.

 The judge then scheduled the case for

preliminary conference for the
purpose of marking the exhibits and
other matters.

 The initial trial will be on December

2, 2021, at 8:30 am. A subpoena will
also be issued to the witness of the
case.

Crim. Case No. 36533-21P Arraignment  The counsel of the accused manifested
People. vs. JOEL that the accused has already been
MARCELLANA informed of the charges against him
For: ATTEMPTED RAPE IN and hereby waives the reading of the
RELATION TO RA 7610 information. The accused has pleaded
not guilty of the charged against him.

Crim. Case No. 15150-05P Pre-Trial

Pp. vs. NARCISO LUCBO  The case was reset. The record shows
re: FRUSTRATED MURDER that the handling prosecutor was no
longer the PAO and the attorney on
record was not notified of the hearing.

 The judge also ordered for the

issuance of a subpoena against the
complainant to appear for the next
 hearing.

 Crim. Case No. 30631- Pre-trial  Regarding Mike Kalaw, an officer of

17PV (Mike Kalaw is the BJMP manifested that Kalaw was
Pp. vs. TERESITA set for the detained since June 16, 2021, have
SANDULOG hearing of been already considered serve
re: VIOLATION OF SEC. 11 motion for sentence.
(2) IN REL. TO SEC. 13, ART. recognizance)  The examination result is submitted to
II OF RA court for recommendation of
9165 Community-based rehabilitation.
 Crim. Case No. 30632- Kalaw has also paid his fine. The
17V motion for recognizance in favor of
Pp. vs. TERESITA Kalaw was also dismissed for being
SANDULOG moot.
re: VIOLATION OF SEC. 5,  With regards to Teresita Sandulog and
ART. II OF RA 9165 Elena, they are not yet released.
 Crim. Case No. 30633-  The prosecutor also prayed for the
17PV issuance of a subpoena for Police Col.
Pp. vs. TERESITA Avanzado and bring with him the
SANDULOG & MIKE necessary exhibits or evidence for the
KALAW case.
re: VIOLATION OF SEC. 12 IN
REL. TO SEC. 14, ART. II OF
RA 9165
 Crim. Case No. 30635-
17V
Pp. vs. TERESITA
SANDULOG
re: VIOLATION OF SEC. 28
( a) IN RELATION TO SEC. 28
( e)(i) OF
RA 10591
 Crim. Case No. 30636-
17PV
Pp. vs. MIKE KALAW
Re: VIOLATION OF SEC. 7,
ART. II OF RA 9165

Crim. Case No. 32539-18V STATUS  The prosecutor upon checking the
Pp. vs. MARY JOY G. HEARING board resolution of the private
MALUYO complainant(association) prayed to
re: QUALIFIED THEFT move the status hearing for another
date. Majority of the Board of
Directors/Trustees are inclined to
dismiss the case with the objection of
 the President.
 He wants to verify the united stand of
the complainant as to the filing of the
case.
 The judge granted the resetting.
 There was also issuance of the
subpoena to Marieta Vega for her to
appear before the court

Crim. Case No. 34931-20V Status Hearing  The accused waived the reading of the
People vs Glen Vincent information which was manifested by
Valendez his lawyer. He entered into a plea-
re: Violation of Sec. 11, Article bargaining agreement and pleaded
2 of RA 9165 guilty.
 The decision was read to the accused.
His lawyer made the manifestation for
the application of probation.
 The judge ordered him to be subjected
to a drug-dependency examination.
The jail warden of Valencia City then
ordered to assist Valendez of his DDE
and, conduct post-sentence
investigation and submit to court the
results/finding within 30 days from
receipt of the order.
 The judge then ordered the continuing
detention of Valendez until his
application for probation is approved

Crim. Case No. 36576-21V Arraignment  The information was read to the
Pp. vs. RINO CANTOS accused. The accused then pleaded not
re: VIOLATION OF SEC. 11 guilty.
(3), ART. II OF RA 9165  The defense counsel made a
manifestation that they are submitting
their formal offer to enter into a plea-
bargaining agreement.
 The accused pleaded guilty.

 The prosecution also manifested that

they would file their
objection/comment to the motion.

 The case was to be called upon the

next hearing date for status hearing.

Crim. Case No. 19383-09P Status Hearing  The defense manifested that there was
People vs. Erwin Cabasula also a pending case before the same
re: VIOLATION OF SEC. 11, court and asked for time to check the
ART. II OF RA 9165 pending case to have a simultaneous
plea or promulgation thereafter.
 The case was reset.

Crim. Case No. 27839-16P Arraignment  The accused already submitted his
People vs. RYAN SORIA offer for plea-bargaining agreement
For VIOLATION OF RA 9287 and have been signed by both parties.
The accused pleaded guilty of a lesser
offense.
 The counsel manifested that the
accused would apply for probation.
 The judgement was rendered and
found guilty beyond reasonable doubt
for the crime of violation of sec. 3(A)
of RA 9287. He will serve a sentence
of the indeterminate penalty of 90
days.
 The gambling paraphernalia was
confiscated in favor of the
government.
 The application for probation was also
given due course.
 The judge then ordered the continuing
detention of Soria until his application
for probation is approved.
 The judgment was also explained the
judgment to the accused.

Crim. Case No. 29316-19P Status Hearing  The case was reset because the email
People. vs. RODOLFO addresses of the counsel was not yet
VILLAMOR & ROSALIA submitted to the court.
VILLAMOR
re: QUALIFIED THEFT

Crim. Case No. 36370-21P Status Hearing  The arresting officer was ordered to
People vs. WELLJUN SARINO sign the plea-bargaining form and
Re: VIOLATION OF RA 10591 bring it to the prosecutor for review.
 The latter will then bring the form to
the defense counsel before submitting
it to court for consideration.
 The promulgation of judgment will be
on the next hearing date.

Crim. Case No. 36458-21P Presentation of  The prosecutor moved for the
People. vs. KIM RALPH Prosecution’s resetting of the hearing because the
VICENTE Witnesses witness was not present. The court
re: Homicide issued subpoena to the witness to
appear in court.
Crim. Case No. 34572-19P HEARING OF  The court explained to the prospective
People vs. LPHA SAYKALBI MOTION ON custodian of his responsibilities before
aka Alex Musid RECONIZANCE giving him the custody of the accused
For: VIOLATION OF SEC. 5, such as monitoring of the activities of
ART. II OF RA 9165 the latter and bringing his presence to
the court if the court needs the
presence of the accused.
 Upon hearing the conditions and
responsibilities, the prospective
custodian is willing to take such
responsibilities.
 The motion was granted

Crim. Case No. 15080-05P Initial Trial of  The defense counsel manifested that
People vs. EDGAR ALFEREZ, Prosecution’s there was an ongoing settlement as to
MARJUN ALFEREZ, evidence the civil aspect of the case and that the
ERNESTO CAYLAN, complainant submitted an affidavit of
EMMANUEL CAYLAN desistance.
re: FRUSTRATED HOMICIDE  The complainant was not present
during the hearing.
 The case moved for a later date. The
judge issued a subpoena to all the
bonded accused as well as the private
complainant, to appear in the court.

Crim. Case No. 30387-17P Initial Trial for
People. vs. MARK JUNE the Prosecution
QUEROG
re: VIOLATION OF RA 9262
 The prosecutor manifested that the
parties are willing to settle the civil
aspect of the case provided that the
bond posted by the accused shall be
released in favor of his two children.

 The counsel of the defense also

manifested that there was already a
compromised agreement signed by all
parties including the bondsperson.

 The compromised agreement will be

submitted to the court for
consideration.

Crim. Case No. 34076-19V Initial Trial for  The prosecution manifested that the
18. People vs. JERRY the Prosecution parties are inclined for the settlement
TOLEDO of the civil aspect of the case provided
re: Arson the accused withdraw the case filed
against the brother of the private
complainant and the payment of
P60,000 for the value of the burned
motorcycle.
 The first condition has been complied
with.
 The hearing was moved to a later date
to finalize the ongoing settlement of
the civil aspect of the case.

Crim. Case No. 31614-17P Initial Trial for  The private prosecutor was not
People v RAMESE J. the Prosecution notified of the hearing.
LINGATONG  The case was reset.
re: VIOLATION OF R.A 10883