Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What does a good life look like to you? For some, the phrase may conjure up images of a
close-knit family, a steady job, and a Victorian house at the end of a street arched with oak trees.
Others may focus on the goal of making a difference in the world, whether by working as a nurse
or teacher, volunteering, or pouring their energy into environmental activism.
According to Aristotelian theory, the first kind of life would be classified as “hedonic”—
one based on pleasure, comfort, stability, and strong social relationships. The second is
“eudaimonic,” primarily concerned with the sense of purpose and fulfillment one gets by
contributing to the greater good. The ancient Greek philosopher outlined these ideas in his
treatise Nicomachean Ethics, and the psychological sciences have pretty much stuck with them
ever since when discussing the possibilities of what people might want out of their time on Earth.
But a new paper, published in the American Psychological Association’s Psychological Review,
suggests there’s another way to live a good life. It isn’t focused on happiness or purpose, but
rather it’s a life that is “psychologically rich.”
Studying abroad, for example, is one way that college students often introduce psychological
richness into their lives. As they learn more about a new country’s customs and history, they’re
often prompted to reconsider the social mores of their own cultures. Deciding to embark on
a difficult new career path or immersing one’s self in avant-garde art (the paper gives a specific
shout-out to James Joyce’s experimental novel Ulysses) also could make a person feel as if their
life is more psychologically rich.
Adding psychological richness to our conceptions of what a good life can look like, Westgate
says, is important because it “makes room for challenge and difficulty. It’s not just about
‘everything going well and smoothly.’ Stretching and going through uncomfortable experiences,
there is value in that.” If we allow ourselves only narrow models of what a good life can be, we
may wind up assuming that someone whose life is neither hedonic nor eudaimonic must
therefore have a bad life, which is “incredibly presumptive and dismissive of people’s
experiences and values.”
1
Who Wants Psychological Richness? Personality Differences
Hedonic, eudaimonic, and psychologically rich lives are not mutually exclusive, nor is one better
than another. “Someone whose life is good, it tends to be good in many ways, not just in one
way,” Westgate notes. But people may also choose to prioritize one type of life over another.
For example, the study analyzed Big Five personality traits among participants from a number of
different nationalities. According to the study, people who ranked highly on “openness to
experience” were more likely to lead psychologically rich lives. Openness to experience, Oishi
and Westgate say, is often characterized by “vivid fantasy, artistic sensitivity, depth of feeling,
behavioral flexibility, intellectual curiosity, and unconventional attitudes.” Someone who is
artistic and unconventional might be drawn to a life filled with change.
As the authors note, “A significant reason neither a happy life nor a meaningful life captures the
full range of human motivation is that both happy and meaningful lives can be monotonous and
repetitive.” Interestingly, the authors found that people with psychologically rich lives were more
likely to be politically liberal and embrace social change, while those with happy or meaningful
lives were more likely to want to uphold the status quo.
But the study found that the idea of a psychologically rich life wasn’t more popular in Western
or wealthier countries than other places. And while people with happy lives tended to have
higher socioeconomic status, the authors did not find significant associations between income
and people with psychologically rich and meaningful lives.
They did, however, find that the idea of a psychologically rich life was more appealing to people
in certain countries. A psychologically rich life was most popular in Japan (16%), Korea (16%),
India (16%), and Germany (17%), and least appealing in Singapore (7%).
Westgate says she doesn’t know why people in certain countries were more or less into the idea
of pursuing psychological richness. But she does suspect that people may put more weight on
certain versions of the good life depending on their age. “There are times of our life when we
accept discomfort and prioritize exploration,” she says, recalling her own travels in hostels when
she was a young adult. And research shows that people tend to get happier as they age, which is
tied to the fact that “instead of prioritizing challenging experiences, they prioritize familiar things
that will make them happy; instead of meeting new people, they prioritize family and close
friends. Those things do increase happiness, but may decrease psychological richness.”
If you feel that your life is currently good in a way that doesn’t fall into any of the three
categories described by the paper, its authors note there may well be even more dimensions they
haven’t accounted for—an intellectual life, a creative life, or a loving, caring life, for example.
Aristotle was onto something nearly two and a half millennia ago. But Westgate says it’s
important for psychological science to keep pushing beyond the philosopher’s foundation,
expanding our views of what makes life worth living.
2
Most Frequently Mentioned Words In Description Of Ideal Life
The most frequently mentioned words in the US are "job/work, family, and money."
The most frequently mentioned words in India are "family, happiness, and job/work."
The most frequently mentioned words in Japan are "job/work, self, and marriage."
The most frequently mentioned words in Angola are "family, health, and safety."
Quartz | qz.com Data: Oishi and Westgate, "A Psychologically Rich Life"