Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Joshua Nazario
Professor Jeannot
ENC 1102
26 January 2022
Every successive presidency has had its normal fluctuations-why is that? Numerous
factors have direct interplay with this trend, to name a few: antsy constituents who want their
demands to be met, political gridlock, and the classic, “party-on-party” rivalry. All of the
aforesaid issues have, and still will, be a driving reason for elected leaders to fall short of their
promises. It is really easy to fall into the misconception that elected leaders beguile their
constituents with enticing legislation that satisfies their demands and, when elected, fail to
regned their promise. That leader, who they so strongly believed to be their social and economic
“holy-grail”, just aimed to “get the votes, get into power”. Mind you, though it may be true that
some politicians want to gain the limelight and security of power in the executive or legislative
branch, it is not often the case. Some of our social and economic demands are not entirely
“practical” as is demonstrated in the recent editorial published by the editorial board of St.Louis
act.” There, the board clearly identifies an issue faced by lower-middle class families during
COVID, rent eviction, and discusses the topic above- how President Biden had failed to regned
the promise to rescind landlord eviction power over families struggling to produce a stable
income for rent. Why was that the case, simply due to the Supreme Court's actions of barring
Biden’s actions and branding it “unconstitutional”. Oftentimes the Federal government, with
oversight from each branch of government, will ensure that the proposed bill will not contradict
Nazario 2
the provision stated within the Constitution. Of course, one may argue that the Constitution ,in
this present age, is “flexible” and, therefore, an innocent bill like revoking eviction for overdue
rents won’t burn the bridges down for our constitution. In this dissertation, it is important to
realize that most political leaders are committed towards their goal in delivering pieces of
legislation that helps each and every voter in America. Getting through Congress, the executive
department, and the Supreme Court has been quite a jericho for our current President, thus
leaving him no choice but to compromise ( a word which will make a frequent appearance in this
analysis) with his opponents- for the sake of maintaining an equilibrium in the structure of
government. It is my hope that this research paper will widen the lens of the audience and make
them more cognizant of what really happens behind closed doors- that is, a greater scope on the
president’s “business as usual” attitude when turned down by different faculties of government.