Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/348072397
CITATIONS READS
0 223
1 author:
Carlos Alvarez
Eötvös Loránd University
5 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Carlos Alvarez on 08 April 2021.
Received: 16th Oct 2020; Revised: 10th Dec 2020; Accepted: 25th Dec 2020
ABSTRACT
The Backward Design Model (BDM) is a curriculum approach in language teaching, which begins
with the specification of learning outcomes that are the basis for developing instructional
processes and input (Richards, 2013). This study aims to display a theoretical analysis of how the
integration of the BDM has impacted English as a Foreign Language class. Thus, this study
provides the results of reviewing research-based articles about how the integration of the BDM
has benefited EFL teachers and students. These benefits are related to the main elements of the
BDM, namely, designing learning to provide enduring understandings, assessing students’
performance based on acceptable evidence, and planning learning experiences and instructions
based on desirable outcomes. The results indicated that the BDM indeed brought benefits to EFL
teachers and students, revealing that this model's efficient application can help (a) teachers better
understand the procedural knowledge of learning and (b) students improve their English
language skills.
Key Words: Backward Design; EFL; English learning; curriculum design
ABSTRAK
Backward Design Model merupakan pendekatan kurikulum dalam pengajaran bahasa yang diawali dengan
spesifikasi hasil belajar yang menjadi dasar untuk pegembangan proses dan masukan pembelajaran (Richards,
2013). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menampilkan analisis teoritis tentang bagaimana integrasi Backward
Design Model (BDM) berdampak pada kelas bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing. Penelitian ini merupakan hasil
dari telaah artikel berbasis penelitian tentang bagaimana integrasi BDM bermanfaat bagi para guru dan siswa
EFL. Manfaat ini berkaitan dengan elemen utama BDM yaitu merancang pembelajaran untuk pemahaman yang
bertahan lama, penilaian kinerja siswa berdasarkan bukti yang dapat diterima, dan merencanakan pengalaman
dan instruksi pembelajaran berdasarkan hasil yang diinginkan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa BDM
memang membawa manfaat bagi para guru dan siswa. Hasil penelitian juga mengungkapkan bahwa penerapan
model yang efisien ini membantu para guru untuk memiliki pemahaman yang lebih baik tentang pengetahuan
prosedural pembelajaran dan juga membantu siswa untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berbahasa Inggris mereka.
Kata Kunci: Backward Design; EFL; Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris; Desain Kurikulum
How to Cite: Llerena C. (2020). The Benefits of Backward Design in The English As a Foreign Language Context.
IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 7(2), 145-158. doi:10.17785/ijee.v7i2.17785
Wiggins and McTighe (1998) are templates that cover the three main
established three stages when planning stages of the BDM. Wiggins and
backward. The first stage deals with McTighe (2005) indicated that the first
identifying the desired results or big part of the unit plan focuses on the
ideas based on skills, understandings, desired results based on students’
and knowledge teachers want their knowledge in new learning and
students to achieve. These desired authentic situations. Moreover,
results are based on performance tasks concepts of knowledge, understanding,
defined as authentic tasks where and essential questions are integrated
students demonstrate their knowledge, into this stage's main aspects.
understanding, and skills by
The second part of the unit plan is
performing real or simulated tasks to an
called evidence. In this stage, the
identified audience (Wiggins &
performance task and other assessment
McTighe, 2005). The second stage
aspects are integrated to check
focuses on determining assessment
students’ progress during learning.
evidence to validate and check if
Finally, the third stage is called the
students have acquired enough
learning plan. In this stage, the teachers
knowledge and understandings to
decided which content, strategies,
achieve the desired results established
techniques, materials, and learning
in stage one. This stage deals with
experiences will be applied during the
integrating different instruments to
learning process to assist students in
assess students’ performance during
achieving desired results.
the process of learning.
These desired results deal with
Finally, the third stage emphasizes
applying the performance task to
learning experiences and instruction
transfer their knowledge to new
that teachers will apply to lead students
contexts; thus, transferability is
to achieve the desired results. In this
considered one of the main foundations
stage, teachers prioritize the content to
of the BDM. Childre, Sands, and Pope
be taught and choose the learning
(2009) explained that transferring
experiences that students will do
knowledge into the BDM focuses on
during the unit or course to develop the
how students show their long-term
performance tasks.
understanding by using their
Planning the BDM is based on knowledge and skills to achieve the
designing unit plans. Yurtseven and desired results established in the unit
Altun (2017) explained that unit plans plan.
Education, (9) Perfusion Journal, (10) The Backward Design Model in EFL
Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Education
Research, and (11) New Waves Curriculum design is one of the
Educational Research & Development. fundamental pillars of education. In
Articulating key areas of analysis language teaching programs, Richards
(2013) stated that curriculum design is
In this step, the chosen articles
branched into three approaches:
were shown to articulate two main
forward, central, and backward design.
themes: integrating the BDM to assist
The researcher also indicated that each
EFL teachers’ procedural knowledge of
curriculum differs from how the
learning and improving students’
syllabus is addressed in connection
English skills.
with input and methodology to achieve
Analysis of the content students’ learning outcomes:
The eleven studies were coded and
shared with another researcher who
verified the documents’ consistency.
The author analyzed the data from the
eleven studies through comparison and
interpretation to determine themes
Figure 1. The Backward Desing Process
based on the benefits of integrating the
(Richards, 2013)
BDM model into EFL contexts. Findings
from this process are presented in the Whitehouse (2014) indicated that
next section. BDM in language learning provides a
framework for curriculum planning
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION that can be applied at the unit, course,
Findings or school level. In the same way,
McTighe and Thomas (2003)
This section presents and explains emphasized the importance of using the
the outcomes of this study that collects BDM to help teachers develop unit
the benefits of integrating the BDM in plans or course designs that focused
EFL contexts. Findings from the mainly on the learning outcomes that
electronic sources, mentioned in the they expect from their students’
methods parts, were gathered into learning process.
themes, and they are detailed in the
following explanation: During the last decade, much
empirical research has been conducted
tasks based on applying the BDM. The Upon the completion of the service-
researcher indicated that the unit plan learning project, the researchers stated
is based on the integration of the three three main benefits. First, designing
central aspects of the backward design unit plans based on the BDM allowed
model, namely (1) Identify Desired teachers to fulfil the established goals.
Results, (2) Determine Acceptable Second, by applying the BDM unit
Evidence, and (3) Learning experiences plans, teachers could reflect on their
and Instructions. Thus, the researcher teaching practices' weaknesses and
stated that designing a unit plan helps strengths. Finally, with the integration
teachers and instructional leaders of the BDM, teachers and community
follow and maintain articulation on the stakeholders reported satisfaction with
planning goals and the transfer tasks the projects’ goals, procedures, and
that students will develop during the outcomes.
learning process.
Backward Design Model: Teachers’
Backward Design to Develop Service- professional development
Learning in Preparation
Yurtseven and Altun wrote
Jozwik, Lin, and Cuenca-Carlino Understanding by Design (UbD) in EFL
wrote this article in 2017. It aimed at Teaching in 2017. It focused on
reporting the effectiveness of the investigating the change the BDM made
application of the BDM to develop and on teachers’ professional development
implement a service-learning project. and students’ achievements. This action
Thirty-seven teachers participated in research was conducted with ten
this action research that was carried out teachers and 436 students from a state
in the United States of America. This university in Turkey.
study focused on the teachers’
This study showed that
application of the BDM principles to
implementing the backward design
design a unit plan. The teachers’ unit
model had a positive impact on
plans' principal components were:
teachers’ professional development.
Focus on the Project: Literacy Tutoring,
First, the researchers mentioned that
Goals of the Project and Desired
designing the unit plan based on the
Outcomes, Assessment of Students’
BDM allowed teachers to improve their
Growth and Leaning, Project Activities
pedagogical instructions by having a
and Implementation Plan, and
clear idea of how the instruction will be
Demonstration and Celebration.
conducted. Second, by implementing
the unit plan, teachers could improve
their time management, prioritize After comparing the pre- and post-
content to be covered, and provide task of the control and experimental
enriching materials and activities to groups, the researchers indicated that
help students achieve the desired the BDM was pedagogically superior to
results. the traditional model in improving
Iranian EFL learners’ writing ability. In
Benefits of applying the Backward
Design Model in EFL Learning terms of enhancing writing abilities, the
researchers stated that the experimental
In the English as a Foreign group learners experienced significant
Language learning setting, performance improvements in their pre and post-test
tasks based on the unit plan from the scores, which indicate the effectiveness
BDM have been applied to efficiently of the BDM in boosting EFL learners’
integrate students’ knowledge into real- writing abilities.
life situations (Manzano, 1992). By
developing performance tasks, students Effect of the BDM on L2 Reading
Comprehension
interact, collaborate, and create final
products based on the desired results Maryam Hodaeian and Reza Biria
established for each unit plan conducted this study in 2015. This
(Daughtery, 2006). study determined whether the
application of the BDM significantly
Impact of BDM on improving
learners’ writing ability affects intermediate EFL learners’
reading comprehension. The
This paper was written by Hossein investigation was conducted in Iran
Hossein, Azizeh Chalak, and Biria in with 150 EFL students from a private
2019. This study's main focus was to institute. Control and experimental
determine whether the integration of groups were assigned to this study.
the BDM significantly improves Iranian
EFL learners’ writing ability. One The researchers indicated a
hundred students participated in this significant increase between the
research, divided into control and experimental group’s pre and post-test
experimental groups. The control group based on the comparison between the
received writing instruction through control group's pre and post-test. Thus,
the forward or traditional design EFL learners from the experimental
during the experimental group through group obtained better results, which
the integration of the BDM. indicates that they were more
successful in reading comprehension by
implementing the BDM. Furthermore,
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JA
/download?doi=10.1.1.1060.77&rep= LLR/article/view/162
rep1&type=pdf
Hosseini, H., Chalak, A., & Biria, R. (2019).
Daugherty, K. K. (2006). Backward course Impact of backward design on
design: Making the end the improving Iranian advanced
beginning. American Journal of learners’ writing ability: Teachers’
Pharmaceutical Education, 70(6), 135. practices and beliefs. International
http://10.5688/aj7006135 Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 33-50.
https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1211038
Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated
curriculum as an effective way to Jozwik, S., Lin, M., & Cuenca-Carlino, Y.
teach 21st-century capabilities. Asia (2017). Using backward design to
Pacific Journal of Educational develop service-learning projects in
Research, 1(1), 31-50. teacher preparation. New Waves-
https://bit.ly/3oFm2rI Educational Research and Development
Journal, 20(2), 35-49.
Eddy, J. (2017). Unpacking the standards
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1
for transfer: Intercultural competence
211391.pdf
by design. NECTFL Review, 79, 53-72.
https://www.nectfl.org/wp- Korotchenko, T. V., Matveenko, I. A.,
content/uploads/2017/02/NECTFL- Strelnikova, A. B., & Phillips, C.
SPECIAL-ISSUE.pdf#page=55 (2015). Backward design method in
foreign language curriculum
El Ghany, M. A. O., Salem, M. Z. M., Amin,
development. Procedia-Social and
M., & Yousif, A. (2019). Using
Behavioral Sciences, 215, 213-217.
performance assessment tasks for
http://earchive.tpu.ru/handle/1168
developing EFL listening
3/33666
comprehension skills among
preparatory stage pupils, Journal of Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of
College Education, 30(118), 1- classroom: Teaching with dimensions of
20. https://doi.org/ learning. Association for Supervision
10.12816/JFEB.2019.61557 and Curriculum Development.
Fox, B. E., & Doherty, J. J. (2012). Design to McCusker, K., & Gunaydin, S. (2015).
learn, learn to design: Using Research using qualitative,
backward design for information quantitative, or mixed methods and
literacy instruction. Communications choices based on the
in Information Literacy, 5 (2), 144-155. research. Perfusion, 30(7), 537-542.
https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659114
10.15760/comminfolit.2012.5.2.109 559116
Hodaeian, M., & Biria, R. (2015). The effect McTighe, J., & Thomas, R. S. (2003).
of backward design on intermediate Backward design for forward
EFL learners’ L2 reading action. Educational leadership, 60(5),
comprehension: Focusing on 52-55.
learners’ attitudes. Journal of Applied http://edml260.pbworks.com/f/Bac
Linguistics and Language Research, 2(7), kward+Design+for+Forward+Action
80-93. +.pdf
http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/ijee | DOI: http://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v7i2.17785
157-158
P-ISSN: 2356-1777, E-ISSN: 2443-0390 | This is an open access article under CC-BY-SA license
IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 7 (2), 2020
Pérez, Y., Rey, L., & Rosado, N. (2019). assessment in teaching. School Science
Characteristics of EFL curriculum in Review, 95(352), 99-104.
the Colombian Caribbean Coast: The https://bit.ly/3m5lv0r
case of 12 state schools. English
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005).
Language Teaching, 12(11), 85-96. doi:
Understanding by design (2nd ed.).
10.5539/elt.v12n11p85
Association for Supervision and
Sideeg, A. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy, Curriculum Development.
Backward Design, and Vygotsky’s https://doi.org/10.14483/calj.v19n1.
Zone of Proximal Development in 11490
crafting learning
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). What is
outcomes. International Journal of
backward design. Understanding by
Linguistics, 8(2), 158-186.
design, 1, 7-19. Retrieved from:
https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9252
https://valenciacollege.edu/faculty/
Rahimi, M., & Alavi, J. (2017). The role of development/courses-
teaching experience in language resources/documents/WhatisBackw
teachers’ perceptions of a top-down ardDesignWigginsMctighe.pdf
curriculum change. The Curriculum
Yurtseven, N., & Altun, S. (2017).
Journal, 28(4), 479-503.
Understanding by Design (UbD) in
https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.20
EFL teaching: Teachers’ professional
17.1344134
development and students’
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum achievement. Educational Sciences:
approaches in language teaching: Theory & Practice, 17(2).
Forward, central, and backward https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.2
design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5-33. .0226
https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212
Yurtseven, N., & Altun, S. (2015).
473293
Understanding by design (UbD) in
Wach, E., & Ward, R. (2013). Learning about EFL teaching: The investigation of
qualitative document analysis. IDS students’ foreign language learning
Practice Paper in Breif. 13(1), 1-10. motivation and views. Journal of
https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendoc Education and Training Studies, 4(3),
s/handle/20.500.12413/2989 51-62.
https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i3.12
Whitehouse, M. (2014). Using a backward
04.
design approach to embed