Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 1
Introduction
PRESENTATION
2
The global environment of business
Firms operate in a dynamic
environment
Influence on firms?
The Dynamic Business Environment (Attribution: Copyright Rice University, OpenStax, under CC-BY 4.0 license)
The structure of the course
Claudio Brenna
Gong Zheng
Activities
• Lectures
– Lecture notes &
readings
– Participation
7
Exam
OR …
• 2 partial exams (50% -- 50%)
– 30 minutes
– 2 essay question
THE LONG RUN: MOTIVATION
9
Motivation: why the long run?
“Economists set themselves too easy, too useless a task if in tempestuous seasons
they can only tell us that when the storm is long past the ocean is flat again”
10
Motivation: why the long run?
Warren Buffett
11
Motivation: why the long run?
Dominic Barton, “Capitalism for the Long Term”, Harvard Business Review, March 2011
13
Motivation: Why the long run?
Dominic Barton, “Capitalism for the Long Term”, Harvard Business Review, March 2011 14
Short-termism vs. long-term firms
Long-term firms are defined accordingly to a five-factor Corporate Horizon index, based, among other factors, on consistency of
investment rates and quality of earnings
More info in: "Measuring the Economic Impact of Short-Termism", McKinsey Global Institute, Discussion paper, February 2017. 15
OVERVIEW OF PART 1
16
The economic environment
in which firms operate
Determinants of Long-Run Economic Growth(L2-L3)
The Slowdown in Productivity (L4-L5)
Globalization (L9-L10)
LONG-RUN ECONOMIC GROWTH
18
Long-run growth: focus on “potential” GDP
Actual GDP
Observed!
Cyclical component included
Potential GDP
highest level of output an economy can sustain over a period of time
“Full employment” GDP
!!! Not observed!!!
19
Growth is quite a recent phenomenon…
21
Log of GDP per capita (1820-2018)
Campante, F., Sturzenegger, F. and Velasco, A. 2021. Advanced Macroeconomics: An Easy Guide. Ch. 2. ‘Growth theory
preliminaries’, pp. 7–22. London: LSE Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.ame.b License: CC-BY-NC 4.0
Log of GDP per capita (1820-2018)
Campante, F., Sturzenegger, F. and Velasco, A. 2021. Advanced Macroeconomics: An Easy Guide. Ch. 2. ‘Growth theory
preliminaries’, pp. 7–22. London: LSE Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.ame.b License: CC-BY-NC 4.0
A new gravity center?
OECD (2016), OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016, OECD Publishing, Paris.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-en
24
Introduction: long-run growth
26
Definition of Economic Growth
• 𝑦 ≡ per−capita GDP
• 𝑔 ≡ growth rate of per-capita GDP
𝒚𝒕 − 𝒚𝒕−𝟏 𝒚𝒕
𝒈≡ = −𝟏
𝒚𝒕−𝟏 𝒚𝒕−𝟏
• Alternatively:
𝐥𝐧 𝒚𝒕 − 𝐥𝐧 𝒚𝒕−𝟏 = 𝐥𝐧 𝟏 + 𝒈 ≈ 𝒈
Small differences make the difference!
28
Small differences in growth rates result in large
differences in standards of living
In 2014
Jones, C. I. (2013), Macroeconomics, (3rd edition), W. W. Norton & Company. 29
Per capita GDP, US… growth rate?
𝑦𝑡 = 𝑦0 1 + 𝑔 𝑡 𝑦𝑡 = 𝑦0 𝑒 𝑔𝑡
In logs: In logs:
ln 𝑦𝑡 = ln 𝑦0 + 𝑡 ln 1 + 𝑔
𝐥𝐧 𝒚𝒕 = 𝐥𝐧 𝒚𝟎 + 𝒈𝒕
ln 𝑦𝑡 ≈ ln 𝑦0 + 𝑔𝑡
The Ratio Scale or Log Scale
33
Ratio Scale
26000
21000
16000
11000
6000
1000
1874
1880
1886
2012
1850
1856
1862
1868
1892
1898
1904
1910
1916
1922
1928
1934
1940
1946
1952
1958
1964
1970
1976
1982
1988
1994
2000
2006
36
10000
1000
1850
1856
1862
1868
1874 (ratio scale)
Italy, US$ 2011
100000 GDP per capita
1880
1886
1892
1898
1904
1910
1916
1922
1928
1934
1940
(ratio scale)
1946
1952
1958
1964
1970
1976
1982
1988
1994
2000
Real GDP per capita (US$ 2011) – ITALY
2006
2012
37
Real GDP per capita (US$ 2011) – ITALY
(ratio scale)
100000 GDP per capita
Italy, US$ 2011
(ratio scale)
g ≈ 1.8%
10000
1000
1856
1886
1952
1850
1862
1868
1874
1880
1892
1898
1904
1910
1916
1922
1928
1934
1940
1946
1958
1964
1970
1976
1982
1988
1994
2000
2006
2012
38
Real GDP per capita (US$ 2011) – ITALY
(ratio scale)
100000 GDP per capita
Italy, US$ 2011
(ratio scale)
g ≈ 1.8%
10000
g ≈ 2.9%
g ≈ 0.7%
1000
1856
1886
1952
1850
1862
1868
1874
1880
1892
1898
1904
1910
1916
1922
1928
1934
1940
1946
1958
1964
1970
1976
1982
1988
1994
2000
2006
2012
39
Real GDP per capita (US$ 2011) – ITALY
(ratio scale)
100000 GDP per capita
Italy, US$ 2011
(ratio scale)
g ≈ 1.3%
g ≈ 1.8%
10000
g ≈ 6% g ≈ 2.9%
g ≈ 0.7%
1000
1856
1886
1952
1850
1862
1868
1874
1880
1892
1898
1904
1910
1916
1922
1928
1934
1940
1946
1958
1964
1970
1976
1982
1988
1994
2000
2006
2012
40
Properties of growth rates
𝑥
• 𝑖𝑓 𝑧 = ⇒ 𝑔𝑧 ≈ 𝑔𝑥 − 𝑔𝑦
𝑦
• 𝑖𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑥𝑦 ⇒ 𝑔𝑧 ≈ 𝑔𝑥 + 𝑔𝑦
• 𝑖𝑓 𝑧 = 𝑥 𝛼 ⇒ 𝑔𝑧 ≈ 𝛼 𝑔𝑥
𝐺𝐷𝑃
• Example: 𝐺𝐷𝑃 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎 =
𝑃𝑜𝑝
– In growth rates: 𝑔𝑦 = 𝑔𝑌 − 𝑔𝑃𝑜𝑝
41
DETERMINANTS OF ECONOMIC
GROWTH: A SIMPLE MODEL
42
Production function
• Why a model?
• Assumptions:
– Single, closed economy
– One good, Two inputs: Labor (𝐿) & Capital (𝐾)
• Production function:
– Amount of output (Y) produced given any number
of inputs
Production Function
Production Function: properties
1 2
𝑔𝑌 = 𝑔𝐴 + 𝑔𝐾 + 𝑔𝐿
3 3
• Growth Accounting:
– Decomposes growth rates of GDP into its
determinants
47
Growth accounting
Growth Accounting 2000-2007
6.00
5.00 5.04
4.00
3.00
2.48 2.61
2.00
1.88
1.32
1.00 1.11
0.00
United States United Kingdom Germany France Italy Korea
-1.00
Hours worked Productive capital stock Capital quality Multifactor productivity GDP growth, 2000-2007
https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/f25cdb25-en/1/3/2/index.html?itemId=/content/publication/f25cdb25-
en&_ga=2.170310304.1032747907.1635328012-
170235285.1626793023&_csp_=f3624e8b770eac8d5dc12a37d86e806e&itemIGO=oecd&itemContentType=issue#section-d1e819
Key concepts