Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kunal Dasgupta
CONSUMPTION
1/68
Figure 1: Consumption as a share of GDP (2010)
2/68
Figure 2: Drivers of GDP growth in India
3/68
Private consumption expenditure has the following features:
4/68
In this topic, we shall discuss
5/68
Keynesian consumption function
John Maynard Keynes made the following conjectures about
how individuals consume:
6/68
The Keynesian Consumption function takes the following form:
C = α + βY,
where
• Y is disposable income.
• α is the “minimum” level of consumption.
∆C
• ∆Y = β, where 0 < β < 1.
7/68
Evidence
8/68
The data was supportive of the following hypotheses:
9/68
From individual to per capita
Dividing by N ,
C̄ = α + β Ȳ ,
where
10/68
Based on the empirical success of the Keynesian consumption
function, economists predicted that consumption should closely
follow income over time.
11/68
Evidence
12/68
Putting together all the evidence, it seems that income
13/68
Life-Cycle hypothesis
Life Cycle hypothesis (LCH)
14/68
• Tintin became a reporter today.
He is 20 years old.
• He plans to work until age 60 and
expects to die at age 80.
• He expects to earn 150 francs
every year he works (Y ).
• Spreading resources earned
during his service life (S) over the
remaining years of life (T ), Tintin
will spend
S×Y
C= .
T
or 100 francs every year.
15/68
Tintin’s wealth (W) evolves in the following way:
• Is 0 at age 20.
• Is 0 at age 80.
• Is maximized at age 60.
• Until retirement, Wt = 50 × (t − 20) at age t.
• Since retirement, Wt = Wt−1 − 100.
16/68
Figure 5: Lifetime consumption and saving
17/68
Application 1: mpc and nature of income
18/68
Application 2: mpc and age distribution
19/68
Deviations from LCH:
1. Borrowing constraints
2. Myopia
3. Precautionary savings
4. Bequest
• The theory assumes that when current desired consumption
is more than current income, an individual can borrow.
• But borrowing may not be an option for every individual
due to financial market frictions.
20/68
Deviations from LCH:
1. Borrowing constraints
2. Myopia
3. Precautionary savings
4. Bequest
• The theory assumes that when current desired consumption
is more than current income, an individual can borrow.
• But borrowing may not be an option for every individual
due to financial market frictions.
21/68
Deviations from LCH:
1. Borrowing constraints
2. Myopia
3. Precautionary savings
4. Bequest
• The theory assumes that individuals are able to correctly
value future consumption.
• But individuals could attach too much importance to the
present relative to the future.
22/68
Deviations from LCH:
1. Borrowing constraints
2. Myopia
3. Precautionary savings
4. Bequest
• The theory assumes that individuals save/dis-save only to
smooth consumption over the lifetime.
• But individuals could also save for future contingencies such
as unexpected healthcare expense.
23/68
Deviations from LCH:
1. Borrowing constraints
2. Myopia
3. Precautionary savings
4. Bequest
• The theory assumes that individuals only save for personal
consumption.
• But individuals could also save for consumption of future
generations.
24/68
Inter-temporal model
• Until now, we had simply assumed that individuals would
want to smooth consumption.
• Next, we consider a model where an individual optimally
chooses current and future levels of consumption.
• The key feature of this model is that consumer choice must
satisfy an inter-temporal budget constraint.
25/68
The basic two-period model
26/68
• Period 2 budget constraint is:
C2 = Y2 + (1 + r)S
= Y2 + (1 + r)(Y1 − C1 ).
• Re-arranging terms
(1 + r)C1 + C2 = (1 + r)Y1 + Y2 .
27/68
..... the inter-temporal budget constraint:
C2 Y2
C1 + = Y1 + .
| {z1 + r} | {z1 + r}
Present-value of consumption Present-value of income
28/68
The intertemporal budget constraint
C2
(1 + r )Y1 +Y 2
Consump =
Saving income in
both periods
Y2
Borrowing
C1
Y1
Y1 +Y 2 (1 + r )
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 14
29/68
The intertemporal budget constraint
C2
The slope of
the budget
line equals 1
-(1+r ) (1+r )
Y2
C1
Y1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 15
30/68
Consumer preferences
Higher
C2
An indifference indifference
curve shows curves
all combinations represent
of C1 and C2 higher levels
that make the of happiness.
consumer
equally happy. IC2
IC1
C1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 16
31/68
Consumer preferences
C2 The slope of
Marginal rate of an indifference
substitution (MRS ): curve at any
the amount of C2 point equals
the consumer the MRS
would be willing to 1 at that point.
substitute for MRS
one unit of C1.
IC1
C1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 17
32/68
Optimization
C2
The optimal (C1,C2)
At the optimal point,
is where the
MRS = 1+r
budget line
just touches
the highest
indifference curve. O
C1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 18
33/68
How C responds to changes in Y
C2 An increase
Results:
in Y1 or Y2
Provided they are
shifts the
both normal goods,
budget line
C1 and C2 both
outward.
increase,
…regardless of
whether the
income increase
occurs in period 1
or period 2. C1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 19
34/68
How C responds to changes in r
C2
As depicted here, An increase in r
pivots the budget
C1 falls and C2 rises.
line around the
However, it could point (Y1,Y2 ).
turn out differently… B
A
Y2
Y1 C1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 21
35/68
How C responds to r depends on two effects.
36/68
• In the inter-temporal theory, the timing of income is
irrelevant: the consumer can borrow and lend across
periods.
• For example, if the consumer learns that her future income
will increase, she can increase current consumption by
borrowing in the current period.
• This prediction could change under credit constraints.
37/68
Constraints on borrowing
C2
The budget
line with no
borrowing
constraints
Y2
Y1 C1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 24
38/68
Constraints on borrowing
C2
The borrowing
constraint takes
the form: The budget
line with a
C1 £ Y1
borrowing
Y2 constraint
Y1 C1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 25
39/68
Consumer optimization when the
borrowing constraint is not binding
C2
The borrowing
constraint is not
binding if the
consumer’s
optimal C1
is less than Y1.
Y1 C1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 26
40/68
Consumer optimization when the
borrowing constraint is binding
C2
The optimal
choice is at
point D.
But since the
consumer
cannot borrow, E
the best he can D
do is point E.
Y1 C1
CHAPTER 17 Consumption 27
41/68
• In the above example, the consumer’s borrowing constraint
binds – her current consumption is sub-optimal.
• Accordingly, following an increase in future income, she is
not able to increase current consumption.
• Hence, her consumption behaves as in the Keynesian
theory even though she is rational and forward-looking.
42/68
INVESTMENT
43/68
Figure 17: Investment rate and GDP growth for India
44/68
Figure 18: Investment and growth (2000 - 2013)
45/68
Private investment expenditure has the following features:
46/68
Keep in mind that
47/68
In this topic, we shall discuss
48/68
Business fixed investment
Definition
Business fixed investment refers to private firms’ spending on
equipment and structure for use in production.
Observe that
49/68
The Cost of Capital
cK = PK (r + δ),
50/68
Firm’s problem
51/68
Capital stock and Investment
Kt+1 = Kt + It − δKt ,
52/68
Investment and real interest rate
55/68
Example:
56/68
57/68
Application: Credit rationing
p(1 + i∗ ) = 1 + i.
=⇒ i∗ > i.
59/68
Definition
Residential investment refers to the construction of
single-family and multi-family houses.
Observe that:
60/68
The return from housing depends on
• Benefit
• The rent for a landlord or implicit value for owner
• Any capital gains
• Cost
• Mortgage interest rate
• Real estate taxes and depreciation
61/68
House prices and risk
62/68
House prices and finances
63/68
64/68
65/68
Inventory investment
Definition
Inventory investment consists of raw materials, goods under
production and any change to the existing inventory of finished
goods.
Observe that:
66/68
Some benefits of holding inventory
67/68
• BMW has an extremely complex
supply chain, with 12,000
suppliers in 70 countries.
• Despite this complexity, BMW
has adopted a just-in-time
inventory method.
• On average, a BMW assembly
line has just one and half hours of
inventory at any given point in
time.
68/68