Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
Damsin and neoambrosin are two important anticancer phytopharmaceuticals of Ambrosia maritima (Damsissa).
Despite their importance, no report has yet discussed their extraction from plants on lab or industrial scales.
Consequently, the present article aims to develop an ultrasonic-assisted extraction (UAE) model for their
extraction on the lab scale. Box-Behnken model was applied to investigate the effects of ethanol strength (X 1: 40-
100%), drug solvent ratio (DSR, X2: 1:20-1:60), and time (X3: 30-90 min) on the yield of damsin and
neoambrosin in damsissa extract. Surprisingly, only ethanol strength was the significant factor in damsin yield
with an optimum value of 55%. Time and DSR played no significant roles in damsin content. No statistically
significant model could be deduced for neoambrosin. The model is a preliminary step to elucidate factors
affecting the UAE of sesquiterpene lactones from plants and a preamble for its large scale green extraction.
Keywords: Damsin; Neoambrosin; Ultrasonic-assisted extraction; response Surface method; sesquiterpene lactones;
Ambrosia.
Large scale extraction of STL is imperative materials were previously isolated and authenticated
to secure enough supply. Chemical synthesis [16, 26].
of damsin required eighteen reactions and was 2.2. Model construction
found intricate because of the many chiral Box-Behnken design was constructed for the
centres of the molecule [17-20]. optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of
Phytochemical isolation would be a cheaper sesquiterpene lactones from A. maritima. Three
and reliable alternative to chemical synthesis. parameters were selected for optimization of the
Compared to conventional extraction extraction process, namely, Ethanol ratio (Ethanol
techniques, ultrasound-assisted extraction is %, X1), Drug solvent ratio DSR (X2), and
better in terms of saving time, energy, solvent extraction time (X3). Three levels for each
volume, CO2 emission [21, 22]. Although independent variable were selected as in table 1
cavitation was known as the main mechanism The design consisted of 15 runs; however, 14
of action of UAE, several other mechanisms were used in analysis after the omission of an
are involved, e.g., fragmentation, erosion outlier. The model proposed for each response Y
capillarity, detexturation and sonoporation was
[21]. Several factors affect the yield of the Y = β0 + β1X1 + β2X2 + β3X3+ β12 X1X2 + β13
process, e.g., ultrasonic power, time, X1X3+ β23 X2X3 + β11 X12+ β22 X22+ β33 X32
temperature, etc. [21, 22]. Response surface (equation 1)
method (RSM) is a statistical method utilized Y is the response, i.e., damsin or neoambrosin
to evaluate the effect of different variables on content (μg/g dry powder). X1, X2, X3 are the
one or more responses of variables. This can independent variables, namely, ethanol percentage,
be achieved from a lower number of DSR, and time, respectively. β0 is the intercept. β1,
experiments and in a shorter time compared to β1, β1, are the linear coefficients. β12, β13, β23,
other optimization methods [23-25]. are the interaction coefficients; β11, β22, β33, are
The current work is the first report about the the quadratic coefficient terms.
extraction of damsin and neoambrosin from Box-Behnken design was set up using JMP
damsissa. Ultrasound-assisted extraction was software Statistical DiscoveryTM from SAS
utilized and response surface model was employed (Germany). The established model was validated by
to optimize the extraction condition. Hopefully, the Regression value (R2), p-value (p<0.05), and lack
present work would be a step for scaling up the of fit testing. Significance of the tested independent
extraction of STLs from Damsissa as well as other variables and interactions were determined form
plants rich in STL. Pareto-graph, ANOVA testing.
________________________________________________
Egypt. J. Chem. 64, No.3 (2021)
ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED EXTRACTION OF DAMSIN AND NEOAMBROSIN FROM…… 1435
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 2 Box-Behnken design with coded and real values as well as the observed responses in
different extracts
Alcohol Percent Drug solvent ratio, Damsin Neoambrosin
Run Time, X3 (min)
(A%), X1 (%) (DSR) (1-X2) (μg/g powder)* (μg/g powder)
1 1 (100) 0 (40) 1 (90) 104.44 24.246
2 0 (70) -1 (20) -1 (30) 432.53 63.019
3 0 (70) -1 (20) 1 (90) 539.75 110.94
4 1 (100) 0 (40) -1 (30) 101.24 18.595
5 0 (70) 1 (60) -1 (30) 555.57 112.34
6 -1 (40) 0 (40) 1 (90) 623.84 193.27
7 0 (70) 0 (40) 0 (60) 506.38 113.48
8 1 (100) -1 (20) 0 (60) 47.884 19.723
9 -1 (40) 0 (40) -1 (30) 565.77 155.63
10 -1 (40) 1 (60) 0 (60) 525.44 148.23
11 0 (70) 0 (40) 0 (60) 538.87 121.68
12 -1 (40) -1 (20) 0 (60) 524.47 141.53
13 0 (70) 0 (40) 0 (60) 474.59 90.563
14 0 (70) 1 (60) 1 (90) 723.32 135.55
________________________________________________
Egypt. J. Chem. 64, No.3 (2021)
ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED EXTRACTION OF DAMSIN AND NEOAMBROSIN FROM…… 1437
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Table 3: Estimated regression coefficient and ANOVA of the fitted second-order polynomial models of the
investigated parameters
Damsin Neoambrosin
source p-value <0.05
Model 0.008 0.018
Lack of fit 0.139 0.333
A% (X1) 0.032 0.749
DSR (X2) 0.603 0.413
Time (X3) 0.505 0.696
X1X2 0.470 0.987
X1X3 0.675 0.463
X2X3 0.645 0.565
X12 0.004 0.229
2
X2 0.708 0.490
X32 0.297 0.562
________________________________________________
Egypt. J. Chem. 64, No.3 (2021)
ULTRASOUND-ASSISTED EXTRACTION OF DAMSIN AND NEOAMBROSIN FROM…… 1439
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________
Egypt. J. Chem. 64, No.3 (2021)