Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Customer Loyalty
Published 22 December 2020 - ID G00739324 - 5 min read
Customer Service and Support Research Team
Initiatives: Service and Support Customer Experience (CX) and VOC
Overview
While customer service and support leaders have traditionally focused on measuring
customer effort score (CES) to mitigate customer disloyalty, value enhancement score
(VES) provides service organizations with an opportunity to predict positive customer
loyalty outcomes. Our analysis shows CES and VES are complementary and critical
metrics for service organizations to measure and manage. Value enhancement can only
occur if the customer has had a low-effort interaction with the customer service
organization. Thus, service organizations need to monitor both CES and VES together to
ensure customers remain loyal to their organizations.
Key Findings
■ CES and VES metrics work in tandem to mitigate disloyalty and boost customer
loyalty toward an organization.
■ CES moderates the achievable levels of VES, that is, a low-effort customer
interaction is an important prerequisite for achieving high VES scores.
While CES is a critical metric for service leaders, it does have its limitations. CES can only
tell leaders whether a customer is likely to be disloyal following an interaction —- not
whether they will be more loyal. While a high-effort experience will lead to disloyalty, a low-
effort experience does not necessarily lead to increased loyalty. Rather, low-effort
interactions simply return a customer back to neutrality. To measure and manage the
service organization’s positive impact on customer loyalty, service and support leaders
should implement value enhancement and measure success with VES.
Contrary to CES, VES does not assess a customer’s perception of the service interaction
itself. Rather, it assesses how the service interaction impacted a customer’s views of the
product or service offering. VES measures the customer’s perceptions of the project or
service offering and whether the service interaction made those perceptions more
favorable. Specifically, VES is an index of two post-transaction questions:
■ After the customer service interaction, I am able to achieve more with the product or
service … (7-point scale, from “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree”).
These questions provide insight into different elements that comprise customers’ sense of
product or service value, functionality and confidence. Customers who respond positively
are much more likely to continue to do business with the organization.
Figure 4 shows the influence CES has on the value of VES. Average CES scores of 4 or
below lead to low VES scores and results in reduced possibility of customers remaining
loyal.
Only when the average CES value reaches the value of 5 does the average VES score rise
to 4.5. To build customer loyalty through VES, organizations need to maintain the CES
scores of 5 and above. Service organizations could consider the average CES scores of 5
as a benchmark of an average customer whose perceptions of the product or service is
enhanceable through value enhancement.
Hence, CES moderates the achievable levels of value enhancement; in other words, low-
effort interaction opens the door for a higher VES. To achieve a high score on VES, the
customer service experience first and foremost must remain low-effort.
Conclusion
A service strategy aimed at customer loyalty should focus on two important aspects:
mitigating customers’ disloyalty and enhancing their perception about the product or
service. While tracking an individual customer’s VES can be easily used to predict the
probability of loyalty in the future, service organizations should continue measuring CES
to ensure customer interactions are low effort.
Endnotes
1
Shifting the Loyalty Curve: Mitigating Disloyalty by Reducing Customer Effort
2
Engineering the Low-Effort Customer Service Experience
3
2020 Gartner Loyalty Through Customer Service and Support Survey
© 2021 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of
Gartner, Inc. and its affiliates. This publication may not be reproduced or distributed in any form
without Gartner's prior written permission. It consists of the opinions of Gartner's research
organization, which should not be construed as statements of fact. While the information contained in
this publication has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, Gartner disclaims all warranties
as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. Although Gartner research may
address legal and financial issues, Gartner does not provide legal or investment advice and its research
should not be construed or used as such. Your access and use of this publication are governed by
Gartner’s Usage Policy. Gartner prides itself on its reputation for independence and objectivity. Its
research is produced independently by its research organization without input or influence from any
third party. For further information, see "Guiding Principles on Independence and Objectivity."