CONTENTS

DATA SHEET OF SECTION ‘A’ , ‘B’ AND ‘C’

INTRODUCTION
 ANALYSIS OF DATA THE BATCH
 ANALYSIS OF FEMALE OF THE BATCH
 ANALYSIS OF SECTION ‘A’ DATA
 ANALYSIS OF MALE VS FEMALE OF SECTION
‘A’
 ANALYSIS OF MY DATA
 CONCLUSION

1
 INTRODUCTION ABOUT MY ASSIGNMENT

This assignment is based on statistical software which is

called MINITAB. All the calculations in this assignment
are based on this software. In this assignment we are
given the academic record of students of our batch 2018-
19.And we have to analyze it briefly using descriptive
statistics or different graphs which we have learned in our
class and made a complete report of all these given data.

2
 ACADEMIC ANALYSIS OF THE BATCH 2018-19
 Using the CGPA of section A,B and C
Applying basic statistics on the CGPA data

CGPA DATA
section A section B section C
3.300 3.167 2.737
2.200 2.897 3.253
3.250 3.513 2.243
3.340 3.427 3.220
2.913 3.347 3.683
3.580 3.507 3.580
1.430 3.410 3.577
3.200 2.493 2.587
3.243 2.783 3.540
3.667 3.257 2.650
3.613 3.107 2.563
3.410 3.133 3.223
3.406 2.833 2.757
3.563 3.240 3.220
2.307 2.511 2.413
2.290 1.696 3.347
3.030 3.713 3.150
2.407 3.127 3.193
3.100 3.197 3.153
3.043 3.610 3.127
2.593 3.760 3.053
2.517 3.833 3.130
2.860 2.407 2.907
3.480 3.130 3.107
2.990 3.407 3.123
2.630 2.993 2.927
2.270 3.270 3.643
3.110 3.413 3.690
3.630 3.453 2.440

3
3.000 2.910 2.530
3.307 2.910 3.110
2.260 3.320 3.300
2.960 3.643 2.890
3.393 3.600 3.878
3.290 2.903 3.878
2.993 3.170 3.775
3.813
Variables Section A Section B Section C
Mean 2.9882 3.1866 3.1277
Median 3.0715 3.2400 3.1400
Mode 0 2.91 3.22,3.87
Standard 0.5138 0.4393 0.4323
deviation
Variance 0.2640 0.1930 0.1869
Range 2.2370 2.1370 1.6350
Skewness -0.97 -1.18 -0.12
Kurtosis 0.84 2.44 -0.65
Count 36 37 36

4
 Chart of Count( section A, section B, section C )
In the above table we 40

calculate the mean, median,

mode, standard deviation, 30

variance, skewness, kurtosis

and count by using

Data
descriptive statistics tool of 20

Minitab.

From all these information 10

we analyze the academic

record of IM-batch 2018- 0
section A section B section C
19.By using different graphs
or charts from Minitab.

Histogram of section A
3-Parameter Weibull
INTERPRETATION 9
Shape
Scale
2126
811.7
Thresh -808.5
8 N 36

OF CHART OF COUNT: 7

6
Frequency

This bar graphs shows that the highest 4

which section has the highest cgpa , from 3

the following above data that in section 1

B students scored the highest CGPA 0

1.5 2.0 2.5
section A
3.0 3.5

among all sections ,contains the highest

position in the graph.

INTERPRETATION HISTOGRAM AND FREQUENCY CURVE:

From the histogram frequency curve of the three sections we conclude that:

Section A:

5
 Histogram of section C
3-Parameter Weibull

The data is left skewed which 12

Shape 3.575
Scale 1.495
Thresh 1.783

means that the maximum 10

N 36

number of students scored cgpa 8

nearest to mean, median>mean.

Frequency
6
The range is from 3 to 3.5 which
is a good result. 4

0
2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4.0
section C
Section B:
The data of section B is also left skewed which means the students scored
cgpa nearest to mean. The range of this class is from approx 3 to 3.8.

Section C:
The data of section C is left skewed too, that is the mean<median. From this
graph we conclude that range of this class is from 3.4 to 3.7.the data of section
C is more spread than the other two.

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF A,B AND C:

Section B students are good and scored higher cgpa as compared to section A
and C because the histogram frequency curve of section B has longer tail on
the left side that mean the measure of
distribution of values is greater to the Histogram of section B
3-Parameter Weibull

mean. The data of section A is 12 Shape 2832

Scale 953.3
Thresh -949.9

dispersed more than B and C because 10

N 37

have greater range. the data of section 8

Frequency

C is less dispersed because of less 6

range value. 4

0
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5
section B
6
 SUBJECT WISE ANALYSIS
 Using the mean data of gp of subjects of section A,B and C to check
which section is good in their subjects
 The mean data of subjects of three section is given below

Subjects GP sec A GP sec B GP sec C

Calculus 10.6528 10.6405 11.1250
Engineering Mechanics 10.0889 11.2649 9.9556
Basic electrical Engineering. 8.5944 8.6432 8.8944
Pak.studies 4.9500 5.0919 5.5056
Workshop 6.6944 6.6733 6.6944
Applied physics 9.1056 12.9432 13.0889
English 6.2833 6.4162 6.6639
Eng.drawing 6.2833 6.4162 6.6639
Thermo 10.6000 11.4730 11.5273
Computer 10.2083 10.8108 10.6727
application eng.

INTERPRETATION OF BAR CHAT:

7
From the data of subjects of gps we obtain this bar graph from this graph we
see that section b and c scored good marks in APPLIED PHYSICS where as
section A scored good marks in calculus. In Pakistan studies all three sections
scored lowest marks. In English and engineering drawing students of section
A B and C obtained same marks mostly.

COMPULSORY SUBJECT ANALYSIS

 Using the data of GPS of compulsory subjects Pakistan studies

and English and see which section scored good marks
Subjects section A section B section C
English 6.28333 6.41622 6.66389
Pak.studies 4.95000 5.09189 5.50556

INTERPRETATION OF THE BAR GRAPHS:

From the below graph we conclude that in the both compulsory PAKISTAN
STUDIES and ENGLISH section C students obtained good marks, because from
Chart of CGPA sec A, CGPA sec B, CGPA sec C
14

12

10

8
Data

0
subjects

8
 the mean of their gps we obtained this graph showing the highest position of
section C on both subjects.

ACADEMIC ANALYSIS OF FEMALE OF THE BATCH

 using the cgpa of girls of all three sections and apply basic
statistics to see which section girls scored good cgpa
 The data of cgpa of girls of section A,B and C is given below

section A girls section B girls section C girls

3.250 3.167 3.253
3.243 3.507 3.683
3.100 2.833 3.580

Chart of section A, section B, section C

Chart of section A, section B, section C
7
6

6
5

5
4
4
Data

Data

3
3

2 2

1 1

0
subjects english english english 0
subjects pak.studies pak.studies pak.studies
section A section B section C
section A section B section C

9
 3.043 3.240 3.223
2.517 3.127 2.757
3.480 3.197 3.220
2.260 3.270 3.347
3.393 3.413 3.150

By using the descriptive statistics tool of Minitab software

calculating the different parameters and analyze the results using
different graphs.

Mean StDev Variance Median Mode Skewness

SECTION A GIRLS 3.036 0.429 0.184 3.17 0 -1.09
SECTION B GIRLS 3.291 0.201 0.040 3.21 0 -0.64
SECTION C GIRLS 3.343 0.331 0.110 3.25 0 -0.04

10
INTERPRETATION OF BAR GRAPH OF MEAN OF CGPA OF GIRLS
From the mean of
Chart of Mean( section A girls, section B girls, section C girls )
section A ,B and C 3.5

we obtain this bar

3.0
graph , we find
that the highest 2.5

cgpa among the 2.0

Data
girls of three 1.5

sections is
1.0
obtained by a
section C girl 0.5

because in the bar 0.0

section A girls section B girls section C girls

graph the highest

position is obtain section C, the second highest cgpa obtain by section B and
then section A.

HISTOGRAM
Histogram of section A girls, section B girls, section C girls
ANALYSIS: 3 -Parameter Weibull
3.5 Vari able
sec tion A girl s

From the mean and standard 3.0

sec tion B girls
sec tion C girl s

deviation of section A B and C 2.5

Shape
4511
Scale
1272
Thresh
-1269
N
8
7.417 1.252 2.046 8

girl’s data we obtain this 2.0

5.214 1.286 2.094 8
Density

multiple group histogram

1.5
frequency curve graph. This
graph shows that the data of 1.0

all three sections is left 0.5

difference skewed. But the 0.0

2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6
most skewed one is the data D a ta

of section C girls .there is

slightly in data of B and C.then data of section A is more dispersed as the
standard deviation is greater, the section B is data mostly near to the mean
and less dispersed.

11
 ACADEMIC ANALYSIS OF SECTION A
 Using the data of GPS of subjects of Section A of fall semester and
Spring semester and apply basic statistics

Fall semester GPs mean Spring semester GPs mean

Calculus 10.6528 CAE 10.2083
Eng.mech 10.0889 Applied physics 9.1056
Pak.studies 4.9500 Eng.draw 6.2833
BEE 8.5944 Thermo 10.6000
Workshop 6.6944 English 6.2833

By applying basic statistics we calculate following parameters

12
 Histogram of fall semester, spring semester
3 -Parameter Weibull
Variable
0.4 fall semester
spring semester

Shape Scale Thresh N

1494 2551 -2542 5
0.3 7.847 12.75 -3.489 5

Density
0.2

0.1

0.0
2 4 6 8 10 12
D at a

spring semester 8.49 2.09 4.38 9.10 4.31 2 -0.32

Chart of fall semester
12

10

Interpretation of bar
graph 8
fall semester

6
From the bar graph we interpret
that the students of section A 4

scored good GPs in spring

2
semester as compare to fall
semester. The mean of spring 0
calculus engineering mechanics basic electrical eng. pak.studies workshop

semester is higher than fall 9

Chart of Mean( fall semester,
subjects spring semester )

semester that’s why in the bar 8

graph spring semester bar is 7

higher than fall semester. 6

5
Interpretation of histogram
Data

frequency curve graph 3

Histogram of fall semester, spring semester

2
This graph shows the data is Normal
Variabl e
1 0.4
continuous. From this graph we
fall semester
spri ng semester
0 Mean StDev N

conclude that the both data of

fall semester spring semester 8.196 2.375 5
0.3 8.496 2.093 5

spring and fall semester is left skewed.

Density

0.2

0.1 13

0.0
4 6 8 10 12
D at a
That is median>mean. The data of fall semester is dispersed the most because
of higher standard deviation value.

Interpretation of chart of fall semester

From this bar graph we conclude that the mostly students scored good marks
in calculus as the longest bar in the graph shows that. And the lowest mark in
fall semester scored by the students is in Pakistan studies.

Interpretation of chart of spring semester

This graph shows that the mostly students scored good marks in thermo and
lowest marks in English and engineering drawing.

ANALYSIS OF MALE VS FEMALE DATA

 Using the cgpa of male and female of the class we
calculate who gets the high cgpa.

Mean StDev Median Mode Skewness

MALE 2.975 0.542 3.015 0 -0.95
FEMALE 3.036 0.429 3.172 0 -1.09

Chart of spring semester

12

10

8
spring semester

0
Applied physics english eng.drawing thermo computer application eng.
subjectss

14
Interpretation of bar graph:

From the mean of the data we obtain this graph as we calculate above the
mean of both male and female , the of females of this class is greater than male
mean. That means that the
Histogram of FEMALE
females of this class scored 3-Parameter Weibull
good cgpa as compared to 3.0
Shape 4511
Scale 1272
male students. Thresh -1269
N 8
2.5

Interpretation of male
2.0
histogram:
Frequency 1.5
This histogram shows
Chart of Mean( MALE, FEMALE )
that the data of male 1.0

student is left skewed , 3.0

0.5
the value we calculate
2.5
above which is - 0.0
2.0 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6

0.95.which means that 2.0

FEMALE

median>mean. About 7
Data

to 8 students scored 3 1.5

cgpa in male students ,

1.0
the highest cgpa in male
students is about 3.6 to 0.5

3.7.the lowest cgpa is

1.5 scored by one male 0.0
MALE FEMALE

student.
Histogram of MALE
3-Parameter Weibull

Interpretation of female 7
Shape
Scale
2149
870.5
Thresh -867.3

histogram: 6
N 28

5
from this graph we
Frequency

conclude that the data is 4

left skewed , as we 3

calculate the value of 2

skewness comes out 1

0
1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 15
MALE
--1.09.three female students scored cgpa around 3.2 and the highest cgpa
scored in female is around 3.4.the lowest cgpa which we found from this
graph is around 2.3.

4 CREDIT HOUR COURSES ANALYSIS

 Using the data of 4 credit hour courses of the both spring
and fall semester and calculate the mean of the subjects
and analyze in which subject Section A shows good result.

ENGINEERING THERMO FLUIDS APPLIED PHYSICS

MECHANICS
10.09 10.66 11.22

16
INTERPRETATION OF BAR
GRAPH: Chart of Mean( ENGINEERING MECHANICS, THERMO FLUIDS, APPLIED PHYSICS )
12

From the data of 4 credit hour

courses of both fall and spring 10

semester we calculate the mean 8

and from mean we obtain this
bar graph showing the

Data
6

comparison between the these

4
subjects. We saw that in Applied
Physics most of the student 2

scored good marks and in

engineering mechanics students 0
ENGINEERING MECHANICS THERMO FLUIDS APPLIED PHYSICS

scored lowest marks.

Histogram of Engg. Mech., Thermo. (GP), App. Phy.

3-Parameter Weibull
0.20 Variabl e
Engg. Mech.
INTERPRETATION OF Thermo. ( GP)
App. Phy.
HISTOGRAM: Shape Scale Thresh N
0.15 7.972 21.61 -10.26 36
264.2 731.2 -718.9 36
From this histogram we 690.6 1725 -1712 36

conclude that the data of

Density

0.10
all three subjects is left
skewed.
0.05

0.00
0 4 8 12 16
Data

17
 COMPULSORY SUBJECT ANALYSIS
 Using the data of compulsory subjects of fall and spring
semester determine in which subject section A scored good
marks

Chart of Mean( PST, ENGLISH )

7

4
Data

0
PST ENGLISH

Fall semester Pakistan studies GP mean 5.9500

Spring semester English GP mean 6.2833

INTERPRETATION OF BAR GRAPH:

This graph is obtained by the mean of GPs of compulsory subject of fall and
spring semester. From this graph we conclude that the section A scored marks
in their compulsory subject of spring semester which is English as compare to
the Pakistan studies of fall semester.

3 CREDIT HOURS COURSE ANALYSIS

18
  Using the data of 3 credit
Chart of GPs mean
hour course of both
10

semester calculate in
which subject section A 8

scored good marks.

GPs mean
6

0
basic electrical eng. eng.drawing computer application eng.
3 credit hour course

3 credit hour GPs mean

course
basic electrical 8.5944
eng.
Eng.drawing 6.2833
CAE 10.2083
INTERPRETATION OF BAR GRAPH:
From the data of three credit hour course of section A we conclude from the
graph that this class has scored highest marks in computer application
engineering and lowest marks in engineering drawing , as the bar graph
shows the highest position of class in CAE and lowest in ED.

 Comparison between 4 credit hours 3 credit hours and compulsory

courses.

19
 4 CREDIT HOUR 3 CREDIT HOUR COMPULSORY
COURSE GPs MEAN COURSE GPs MEAN COURSES GPs MEAN
10.6 8.59 5.95
11.2 6.28 6.28
10.20

INTERPRETATION OF BAR GRAPH:

this graph is obtained by the mean of gps of both spring and fall semester
courses .From this bar graph we conclude that section A students obtained
good marks in 4 credit courses and lowest marks in compulsory courses.

ACADEMIC RECORD OF FEMALE OF SECTION A

 Using the CGPA of females of section A calculate whose CGPA is

highest or lowest in the class.

FEMALE CGPA

Chart of Mean( 4 credit hours, 3 credit hours, compulsory )

12

10

8
Data

0
4 credit hours 3 credit hours compulsory

20
 AIMAN 3.250
SHIBRAH 3.243
RAWABI 3.043
IQRA 3.100
ARISHA 2.517
NASHMIYA 3.480
HADIA 2.260
DUA 3.396

Interpretation of bar graph:

From the data of cgpa of female we obtain this bar graph which
shows the position of female of this class. The highest cgpa is
obtained by NASHMIYA and the lowest cgpa among the females is
obtained by HADIA.

COMPULSORY SUBJECT DATA ANALYSIS

Chart of CGPA
4

3
CGPA

0
AIMAN SHIBRAH RAWABI IQRA ARISHA NASHMIYA HADIA DUA
21
FEMALE
 using the data of compulsory subjects of both semester and
calculate the results
FEMALE Pakistan studies English
AIMAN 5.4 6.8
SHIBRAH 4.0 8.0
RAWABI 5.4 5.4
IQRA 3.4 6.8
ARISHA 4.0 8.0
NASHMIYA 6.0 8.0
HADIA 3.0 6.8
DUA 7.4 6.8

Chart of pakistan studies, english

9
8
7
6
5
Data

4
3
2
1
0
FEMALE

22
Interpretation of multiple bar graphs:
This multiple bar graph shows the gps scored by the females in their
compulsory subjects. From Pakistan studies bar graph we conclude that
maximum student did not scored as such good marks in this subject. The
highest GP in Pakistan studies obtained by DUA and the lowest GP obtained
by HADIA.From the second graph of compulsory subject , English we conclude
that the most of students scored good marks in this subject. The highest GP in
this subject is scored by NASHMIYA, SHIBRAH and ARISHA and the lowest
by HADIA.

3 CREDIT HOUR COURSE DATA ANALYSIS

 using the data of 3 credit hour course

FEMALE BEE ENG.DRAW CAE

AIMAN 8.1 9.0 10.2
SHIBRAH 11.1 12.0 9.0
RAWABI 10.2 8.1 12.0
IQRA 10.2 10.2 9.0
ARISHA 9.0 9.0 9.0
NASHMIYA 10.2 11.1 12.0
HADIA 6.0 6.0 3.0
DUA 9.0 12.0 10.2

Interpretation of multiple bar graphs;

This graph shows the GPs of 3 credit hour course of both fall and spring
semester. In BEE mostly students scored GPs above 8 .the highest GP is scored
by SHIBRAH, about 11 .In Engineering drawing students scored average
marks the highest marks are obtained by DUA and SHIBRAH. In CAE there is
also a good marks ratio in the class .the highest GPs are scored by RAWABI

23
and NASHMIYA.The overall good marks are scored by in ENGINEERING
DRAWING.

Chart of BEE, ENG.DRAW, CAE

12

10

8
Data

0
FEMALE

ACADEMIC ANALYSIS OF MY DATA

 Using the data of my academic record applying the statistical
operations using Minitab software and analyze my academic
record.

 z-score
Z-score use to measure how many standard deviations and observation
is above and below the mean.
So, firstly I calculate my score in the whole batch and secondly in my
class, section A.
24
Z-score = x-μ /σ

Z-score in the batch:

Total mean of cgpa of the batch (μ) = 3.1008
Total standard deviation of cgpa of the batch (σ) = 0.4618
My cgpa (x) = 3.396
Z-score = 3.396-3.1008/0.4618
= 0.6392
Interpretation:
Hence, my z-score is positive i.e., 0.6392 means that the mean and
standard deviation of my cgpa is above the mean.I scored good GPA in
the batch.

Z-score in female students of the batch:

Total mean of cgpa of female of the batch (μ) = 3.177
Total standard deviation of females cgpa of the batch (σ) = 0.303
My cgpa (x) = 3.396
Z-score = 3.396-3.177/0.303
= 0.722

Interpretation:
Among the females of the batch my cgpa is above the mean and
standard deviation of the given data , the z-score is positive and my cgpa
is good among all.

Z-score in my class:
Mean of cgpa of the class (μ) = 2.988
Standard deviation of cgpa of the class (σ) = 0.5138
My cgpa (x) = 3.396
Z-score = 3.396-2.9882/0.5138
= 0.7936

Interpretation:

25
 Z-score my cgpa in my class is 0.7936, i.e. above the mean and
standard deviation of the class. I scored good cgpa in my class as in the
whole batch.

COMPARING FALL SEMESTER VS SPRING SEMESTER

 using the GPs of both semester comparing my result

Subjects Fall semester subjects Spring

gps semester gps
Calculus 12 CAE 10.2
Pak.studies 7.4 Thermo 13.6
Workshop 8 Eng.draw 12
Eng.mechanics 10.8 English 6.8
BEE 9 Applied 12
physics

Interpretation of bar graph:

From the mean of al subject GPs of both spring and fall semester we
obtained this graph. From this graph we conclude that, scored good
marks in spring
Chart of Mean( fall semester, spring semester )
semester as compare 12

to fall semester as
this bar graph shows. 10

SUBJECT WISE
Data

ANALYSIS 4

0
fall semester spring semester

SUBJECTS fall semester GPs

26
Calculus 12.0
Pakistan. studies 7.4
Workshop 8.0
Eng.mechanics 10.8
basic electrical engineering 9.0

Z-score of the subjects:

1. Calculus:
My GP (x) = 12
Mean (μ) = 10.614
Standard deviation (σ) =2.397
Z-score = 12- 10.614/2.397
= 0.578

2. Pakistan studies:
My GP (x) = 8
Mean (μ) = 4.946
Standard deviation (σ) = 1.120
Z-score = 8-4.946/1.120
= 2.726

3. Workshop:
My GP (x) = 8
Mean (μ) = 6.657
Standard deviation (σ) = 0.906
Z-score = 8-6.657/0.906
= 1.482

4. Eng.mechanics:
My GP (x) = 10.8
Mean (μ) = 10.069
Standard deviation (σ) =3.132
Z-score = 10.8-10.069/3.132

27
 = 0.342

5. Basic electrical engineering:

My GP (x) = 9
Mean (μ) = 8.583
Standard deviation (σ) = 2.541
Z-score = 9-8.583/2.541
= 0.1641

Interpretation:
From all the z-scores we conclude that I scored good marks in Pakistan
studies as compare to other subjects. My result is good in Pakistan
studies in fall semester.
My z-score in other subjects is also good and all are positive which
means my gp is above the value of mean and standard deviation.

subject spring semester GPs

Computer application eng. 10.2
thermo 13.6
Eng.draw 12.0
English 6.8
Applied physics 12.0

1. Computer application engineering:

My GP (x) = 10.2
Mean (μ) = 10.209
Standard deviation (σ) =2.506
Z-score = 10.2-10.29/2.506
= -0.0359

2. Thermo:

28
 My GP (x) = 13.6
Mean (μ) = 10.514
Standard deviation (σ) = 3.950
Z-score = 13.6-10.514/3.950
= 0.7812

3. Engineering Drawing:

My GP (x) = 12
Mean (μ) = 9.023
Standard deviation (σ) = 2.511
Z-score = 12-9.023/2.511
= 1.185

4. English:

My GP (x) =6.8
Mean (μ) = 6.269
Standard deviation (σ) = 1.592
Z-score = 6.8-6.269/1.592
= 0.333

5. Applied Physics:

My GP (x) =12
Mean (μ) = 11.200
Standard deviation (σ) = 3.528
Z-score = 12-11.200/3.528
= 0.226

Interpretation

29
 From the z-score of spring semester subjects we conclude that I scored
good marks in engineering drawing as the z-score is maximum in
engineering drawing.
All the values of z-score is positive except computer application
engineering , which is negative one that means , the marks scored by me
in this subjects is below the mean and standard deviation of the class.

CONCLUSION:
I made this assignment using all the possible tools of Minitab
software which we have learned in our class. I analyze the data in
many different ways and show the result of every outcome. While
making this report I came to know that this software is very helpful
in calculating large amount of data with a less error chance.
From all these analysis of data record of batch 2018-19 we conclude
that overall section B students scored good CGPA but the highest
CGPA is contained by a section C student.
In female of the batch analysis we conclude that the section C girls
obtained good result among all.
In Section A females students are better than male students.
In Section A data analysis we conclude that over class report is good
because all the data of cgpa is left skewed. Section A scored good
result in spring semester as compare to fall semester. In 4 credit
hour course students obtained good marks in thermofluids.In 3
credit hour course student obtained good marks in computer
application engineering. In compulsory courses student obtained
good marks in English. on comparing 4 credit hour , 3 credit hour

30
and compulsory courses we conclude that this class has scored good
result in 4 credit hour courses.
By the female data analysis of this section we conclude that
Nashmiya has the highest cgpa among the female students. In
compulsory subjects they scored good marks in English and in 3
credit hour courses they scored good results in computer
application engineering.
By the analysis of my academic record we conclude that I am good in
mostly all subjects, my z-score is positive in all subjects except
computer application engineering. I scored good result in spring
semester as compare to fall semester.
It is a brief analysis of the academic record of industrial and
manufacturing department students of batch 2018-19.i hope this
report gives you a detailed analysis of academic record of the
students.

31