RUBRICS (PERFORMANCE CRITERIA) PROJECT – COMPLEX PROBLEM (CLO3-PLO2)(CLO2-PLO6)

(CP1: KP3 -Engineering Fundamentals; KP4 -Specialist Knowledge; KP6 – Engineering Practice and KP8 – Research Literature)
(CP2 – Conflicting requirement, CP6 – Extent of stakeholder and CP7 – Interdependence)
OCT 2021 – JAN 2022

CP Descriptors for 1 2 3 4 5 Sub- Total

Rubric Design E, F C-, D B-, C, C+ A-, B, B+ A, A+ marks
Below 49 marks (40 -49) (50 - 64) (79 – 65) (80 marks above)
Analyse the Students address Students able to Students able to Students able to Students able to address
CP1 - Depth of unfamiliar ONE (1) KP address two (2) address three (3) address four (4) more than four (4) KPs
Knowledge problem using KPs KPs KPs with a very good
required = in- specified fundamental of quality
depth knowledge tools (KP1, KP3). The
engineering profile (KPs) students able to
knowledge at the formulate causes of the
level of one or unfamiliar problem
more of KP1, using quality tools (KP3
KP3, KP4, KP6 and KP4) based on their
and KP8 (KP’s) exhaustive research
fundamental, literature (KP8) to show
first principles mastery in the
and specialist principles of quality
knowledge on management system
quality (KP4) that feasible to be
management translated into practice /2.5 marks
system and tools (KP6).
(CLO2-PLO6)

SUB-TOTAL

/2.5 marks

1
 RUBRICS (PERFORMANCE CRITERIA) PROJECT – COMPLEX PROBLEM (CONT’D)
(CP1: KP3 -Engineering Fundamentals; KP4 -Specialist Knowledge; KP6 – Engineering Practice and KP8 – Research Literature)
(CP2 – Conflicting requirement, CP6 – Extent of stakeholder and CP7 – Interdependence)
OCT 2021 – JAN 2022

CP Descriptors for Rubric 1 2 3 4 5 Sub- Total

Design E, F C-, D B-, C, C+ A-, B, B+ A, A+ marks
Below 49 (40 -49) (50 - 64) (79 – 65) (80 marks above)
marks
CP2 – Range Compare the conflicting Provide only Compare 2 issues Compare 3 issues Compare 4 issues Compare more than
of Conflicting technical, engineering 1 issue with acceptable with accordance with acceptable 4 issues lead to
requirement and other issues to solve discussion discussion problem with
= wide & the problems acceptable discussion /2.5 marks
conflicting (Task b)
technical, Assess the conflicting Assess but Assess with 1 Assess with 2 Assess with 3 Assess with more
engr & other requirements and no proposal proposal proposals proposals than 3 proposals
issues provide a satisfactory (mitigation plans and
(CLO3- proposal towards solving solutions to problem
PLO2) the problems that hinder
(Task b) achievement of /2.5 marks
quality objectives)
Assess the parameters of Students Students able to Students able to Students able to Students able to
the products that can be able to identify ONE (1) identify ONE (1) identify TWO (2) identify THREE (3)
measured identify or TWO (2) parameters of the parameters of the parameters of the
(Task a) ONE (1) parameters of the products/services, products/services, products/services,
parameter of products/services illustrate data, illustrate data, illustrate data
the product and illustrate analysis technique analysis collection and
data. for monitoring technique for analysis technique
quality and monitoring for monitoring /10 marks
improvement quality and quality improvement
improvement

SUB-TOTAL /15
marks
2
 RUBRICS (PERFORMANCE CRITERIA) PROJECT – COMPLEX PROBLEM (CONT’D)
(CP2 – Conflicting requirement, CP4 – Familiarity of issues, CP6 – Extent of stakeholder and CP7 – Interdependence)

CP Descriptors for Rubric 1 2 3 4 5 Sub- Total marks

Design E, F C-, D B-, C, C+ A-, B, B+ A, A+
Below 49 marks (40 -49) (50 - 64) (79 – 65) (80 marks above)

CP6 - Extent of Differentiate the diverse Provide one (1) Compare and Compare and Compare and Compare and
stakeholder groups of stakeholders with group differentiate 2 differentiate 3 differentiate 4 differentiate more
involvement and widely varying needs groups groups groups than 4 groups of
conflicting (Task a) stakeholders/custo
requirements = mers that varying
diverse groups of in needs /2.5 marks
stakeholders with
widely varying
Select stakeholder interests Select ONE (1) Select TWO (2) Select TWO (2) Select THREE (3) Select more than
needs
and requirements that give stakeholder and stakeholders and stakeholders and stakeholders and THREE (3)
(CLO2-PLO6)
impact on the problem discuss impact. compare impact. justify impacts. justify impacts. stakeholders and
(Task a) justify impacts.
/2.5 marks

SUB-TOTAL

/5 marks

3
 RUBRICS (PERFORMANCE CRITERIA) PROJECT – COMPLEX PROBLEM CONT’D)
(CP2 – Conflicting requirement, CP4 – Familiarity of issues, CP6 – Extent of stakeholder and CP7 – Interdependence)

CP Descriptors for 1 2 3 4 5 Sub- Total

Rubric Design E, F C-, D B-, C, C+ A-, B, B+ A, A+ marks
Below 49 marks (40 -49) (50 - 64) (79 – 65) (80 marks above)
CP7- Analyse high level Use 1-sub Use 2 sub- Use 3 sub- Use 4 sub- Use more than 4 sub-
Interdependence problems including problems arise problems arise problems arise problems arise problems arise from
= high level many component from the House from the House from the House from the House the House Quality
problems with parts or sub- Quality Quality Quality Quality developed and
many parts problems & developed but developed with developed and developed and differentiate
(CLO2-PLO6) do not elaborate acceptable differentiate differentiate /5 marks
elaboration
Propose problem Propose 1 Propose 2 Propose 3 Propose Propose more than 5
broken down into component of components of components of 4components of components of HOW
smaller components HOW and HOW and WHY HOW and WHY HOW and WHY and WHY with
or sub-problems WHY only only with acceptable with acceptable acceptable /2.5 marks
justification justification justification

SUB-TOTAL
/7.5 marks
TOTAL
/30

Prepared and Marked By : Verification By: Resource Person Complex Problem Committee Verification:

25 Nov 2021 4 Dec 2021

4
5