Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/312297668
CITATIONS READS
10 266
2 authors, including:
Jacek Kawalec
Silesian University of Technology
45 PUBLICATIONS 125 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
The reuse of crushed concrete (spoil material): composites, stone columns, gabions View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Jacek Kawalec on 13 January 2017.
RÉSUMÉ Dans l’article sous la forme d'étude d’un cas on présente la solution géotechnique non-standard pour un haut remblai routier si-
tué sur un sol faible. On a utilisé pour les études des colonnes formées par une méthode d’échange dynamique liées avec une zone de tran-
sition sous la forme du géomatelas, c’est à dire - un granulat non lié stabilisé par une géogrille triangulaire. Au cours de la réalisation du
projet on a effectué les analyses numériques pendant lesquelles on a déterminé les déformations du sol situé au-dessous du remblai et du
géomatelas. Pendant les analyses on a pris en compte l’influence de la mise en œuvre de colonnes sur l'état de la contrainte et l’état de la
déformation dans la couche de transition. Donc, une solution qui est unique c’était l’utilisation un granulat anthropogénique (les schistes de
charbon) qui a coopéré avec une géogrille dans la zone de transition au-dessus des colonnes
Infrastructure development in Poland in recent years Project selected for further analysis was part of new
results in numbers projects where new technologies high speed, collision free road (G class) open to pub-
or combinations of them being used widely. As many lic and toll free. Road has to connect industrial zone
lands where road infrastructure development is ongo- of town with main motorway network providing both
ing are geotechnically degraded there is a need for heavy traffic and passenger traffic. Typical cross sec-
improvement technologies to be used. In industrial tion contains 2x2 lines, design speed of road was V d
areas of Poland it’s typical that man-made soils in = 120 km/h and max wheel load 115kN/axle. Part of
form of uncontrolled deposits are building relatively the road which is subject of interest is nearly 3 km
thick surface layers. Such deposits in depth of several long. Design works started in 2005 however when
meters are likely to be found by geotechnical reports construction started in 2012 Contractor had option to
done prior to design stage of projects in area reserved propose alternatives to optimize cost of original solu-
for road construction.
1511
Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development
tion. Presented application is result of such search for 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD FOR SOIL
alternatives which was approved by Client. IMPROVEMENT BY STONE COLUMNS
INSTALLATION
3 GEOTECHNICAL CONDITION UNDER Stone column allows, as in the case of gravel col-
EMBANKMENT umns, the elimination of large settlements and
providing additional bearing capacity to embank-
Soil formation along the embankment at depth of 4- ment.
13,5 m consist Miocene sediments in form of hard Due to larger diameter of stone columns vs gravel
plastic clays locally interbedded by sands. The above columns (cca 2,0-2,5 m) formed in rapid process
is a series of Pleistocene and Holocene inseparable there is no risk for column dehiscence in weak organ-
non-cohesive sediments in form of coarse and medi- ic ground. Impacts of high energy allows partial re-
um sands. The thickness of the layer is 0,40-10,20m. placement of weak soil on aggregate , while remain-
At the top there is a non-continuous layer of organic ing organic soils is compacted between columns
deposit in form of peat of thickness up to 1,1m. (density increase). Technology for dynamic replace-
ment stone columns makes large diameter columns in
Table 1. Derived geotechnical parameters of the layers from ge- a cohesive soil. In most cases columns are made up
otechnical report. to top of underlying layer with sufficient bearing ca-
pacity. Stone columns are formed by hammering ag-
gregate by heavy burden dropped down from a height
of 10 to 30 m directly into top of weak layer. Col-
umns are formed until final impact gives small set-
tlement versus prior one, what is an indicator of suf-
ficient bearing capacity. Schematic foundation of
stone columns is given on Fig.2.
1512
Kawalec and Warchał
1513
Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development
1514
Kawalec and Warchał
1515
Geotechnical Engineering for Infrastructure and Development
REFERENCES
1516