Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Topic 6.
COMMERCIAL EXPERIMENTATION. PART I
Lecturer: Inna Alexeeva A.
inna.alexeeva@uneatlantico.es
6.1. Commercial Experimentation
1
• Compensation and planning of the problem
2
• Election of treatments and levels
3
• Specification of the experimental units
4
• Selection of the response variable
5
• Delimitation of the test market. External variable
6
• Election of the experimental design
7
• Experimentation running
8
• Information analysis
9
• Conclusions and recommendations
This point looks obvious but in reality it is not easy to realize that
there is a problem or opportunity that require experimentation or
design a clear and acceptable planning.
The object of the study are the individuals, firms or markets with response
to the experimental treatment. They are testing units, that is, those that
are really are submitted to change, or they are control units – they are
simply observed during the testing period without being submitted to
treatment, with the aim to contrast the results obtained with the those of
testing units.
Example: we can ask different people to try a product to measure their
attitudes towards it. Alternatively, the product can be presented in a new
packaging and put for sale in some supermarkets (testing units) and
compare these sales with those obtained with a traditional packaging put
for sale in other supermarkets with similar characteristics (control units).
The researcher will analyse the effect of the variable “packaging” on the
“sales” (dependent variable).
Marketing Research. Topic 6: Commercial Experimentation. Part I
6
6.1. Commercial Experimentation
Guide for recommended proceeding
7 Experimentation running
8 Information analysis
8 Information analysis
Number of factors
EG = global effect
Yj = N(µi, σ)
Ojos
Front Back
Manos Pies
Middle
40 40 15
45 30 25
35 45 30
50 35 25
Totaltreatments
Total tratamientos 170 150 95
Mediatreatments
Mean tratamientos 42,5 37,5 23,75
GlobalGran
Total total 415
Gran
Global media
Mean 415/12=34,58
The Company wants to know if this strategy is benefitial for its sales.
𝑛𝑗 𝑌ത 𝑗 − 𝑌ത 2
2
𝑌𝑖𝑗 − 𝑌ത 𝑗
𝑖 𝑗
(40 – 42,5)2 + (45 – 42,5)2 + (35 – 42,5)2 + (50 – 42,5)2 + (40 – 37,5)2 +
+ (30 – 37,5)2 + (45 – 37,5)2 + (35 – 37,5)2 + (15 – 23,75)2 + (25 – 23,75)2 +
+ (30 – 23,75)2+(25 – 23,75)2 = 368,7125
We note down all the intermediate results in the ANOVA table that facilitates
the interpretation of the analysis.
Treatment: comparison among the groups.
Residual: comparison within the groups (internal interaction).
We compare the F value obtained in the analysis with that from the distribution
table of F - Fisher Snedecor of significance level 0,05 (confidence level of 95%).
Marketing Research. Topic 6: Commercial Experimentation. Part I
30
6.3. ANOVA. Completely Randomized Design
Solution to the Example 1.
ratamiento Treatment
754,1668
754,1668
t-1=2
t-1=2 377,0834
377,0834 377,0834
= 9,204 F2;9;0,05
F2;9;0.05 =
=4,26
40,9680 4,26
Residual 368,7125 N-t=9 40,9680
esidual 368,7125 N-t=9 40,9680
The F value obtained in the analysis is higher than the statistical value from
the table (4,26) we reject the null hypothesis.
The conclusion is that the treatment (allocation of the books on different
levels of display is a computer section of the book shop) DOES produce
significate effects on sales.
Example 2.
A company wants to determine energy needs of a person by walking, eating
or sport training.
Suppose that there are 10 people available for our experiment. The number
of calories consumed per second is considered as response variable. The
results will vary according to the individual who takes part in the
experiment.
Determine what is the FACTOR and the possible LEVELS.
Observations:
The word ‘completely’ indicates that all the levels of the variable treatment
fixed by the researcher are tested in each block.
The variable ‘block’ DOESN’T present interaction with the factors in the
study.
The model is said to be of completely randomized blocks when in each block
all possible treatments are presented (or a multiple of this number) and
within the block the treatments are assigned randomly.
Sometimes it’s impossible to assign all the treatment to each block
incomplete randomized blocks.
Hypothesis • The rest of the variables DOESN’T affect the testing units
ഥ + 𝒀𝒊 − 𝒀
𝒀𝒊𝒋 = 𝒀 ഥ + 𝒀𝒋 − 𝒀
ഥ + 𝒀𝒊𝒋 − 𝒀𝒊 − 𝒀𝒋 + 𝒀
ഥ
𝟐 𝟐
ഥ
𝒀𝒊𝒋 − 𝒀 ഥ𝒊 − 𝒀
= 𝒕 𝒀 ഥ 𝟐 ഥ𝒋 − 𝒀
+ 𝒃 𝒀 ഥ 𝟐 ഥ𝒊 − 𝒀
+ 𝒀𝒊𝒋 − 𝒀 ഥ𝒋 + 𝒀
ഥ
𝒊 𝒋 𝒊 𝒋 𝒋 𝒊
Total N-1
In each block the retailers are assigned randomly to treatments. The duration
of the experiment is one month. We will need to analyse the interactions
through ANOVA model by complete blocks (with a confidence level of 95%).
1.318,25 – 465,93 – 721,5 = 130,82 (difference between the total dispersion and the
other two)
Marketing Research. Topic 6: Commercial Experimentation. Part I
43
6.4. ANOVA. Randomized block design
Solution to the Example 2. Price fixing for a new product
Fb=16,55 F2;6;0,05=2,6
Residual 130,82 6 21,8
Total 1.318,25 11
Conclusions: both prices and type of shops produce significate effect on sales.
45