Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Boletus Clintonianus Boletus Cavipes Boletus Pal-Uster Boletus Chrysenteron Sphagnorum
Boletus Clintonianus Boletus Cavipes Boletus Pal-Uster Boletus Chrysenteron Sphagnorum
#{149}An
extract of this plant agglutinated rabbits’ corpuscles in a
dilution of one-tenth of the juice coming from 5 grams of the fun-
gus in 50 cc. 1120. This agglutinin was not destroyed by boiling
half an hour. The extract was not haemolytic. It was poison-
ous to guinea-pigs one animal weighing 95 grams dying in ten
days from 5 cc. and another weighing 420 grams succumbing in
sixteen days to a dose of the same character. No evidence of
the presence of muscarine in the plant was presented by these
animals. Rabbits were not affected by the plant juice. The
guinea-pigs developed a progressive emaciation but nothing
characteristic could be determined at autopsy. According to
Mcllvaine (5) this fungus is an edible species but Collins (6) has
reported the variety “sensibilis” as possessing poisonous prop-
erties. Other authors fail to mention the character of the species.
It should probably be classed with the poisonous forms, at least
until we have more knowledge of its effect when eaten.
page of the heart had developed and more than one hour later
the application of a drop of the atropine solution brought back
the heart’s action to normal within fifteen minutes. This long-
continued pause is characteristic of muscarine, piocarpine pro-
ducing but a temporary cessation of the heart’s activity as Har-
nack and Meyer have shown (22).
It is thus evident that Clitocybe dealbata sudorifica PECK con-
tains a poison similar in its action to muscarine or piocarpine,
with the probability vastly in favor of the poison being muscarine.
The absolute identification of this body can only be accomplished
by a chemical analysis of the plant. We expect to undertake
this analysis in the near future. In view of the poisonous action
of this fungus upon man when ingested nd upon animals as
a result of subcutaneous injection it should probably be given
specific rank and not be regarded as a variety of Clitocybe dealbata
SOWERBY which apparently contains no poisonous principles
acting upOn man.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
(1) Ford: Jour. Pharmacol. and Exp. Therap., vol. ii, no. 4, March, 1911.
p. 285.
(2) Kobert: Lehrbuch der Intoxikationen, 1906, Bd. ii, 2, s. 1224.
(3) Peck: Boleti of the United States. Bulletin of the New York State
Museum, vol. 2, no. 8, Sept., 1889.
(4) Atkinson: Mushrooms, edible, poisonous, etc., 1903.
(5) Mcllvaine and Macadam: One Thousand American Fungi, 1900, p. 424.
(6) Collins: Rhodora, vol. i, Feb., 1899, no. 2, p. 21.
(7) Mcllvaine and Macadam: One Thousand American Fungi, 1900, p. 464.
(8) Mcllvaine and Macadam: One Thousand American Fungi, 1900, p. 448.
(9) Mcllvaine and Macadam: One Thousand American Fungi, 1900, p. 440.
(10) Mcllvaine and Macadam: One Thousand American Fungi, 1900, p. 425.
(11) Hard: The Mushroom, edible and otherwise, 1906, p. 352.
(12) Mcllvaine and Macadam: One Thousand American Fungi, 1900, p. 445.
(13) Hard: The Mushroom, edible and otherwise, 1908, p. 369.
(14) Atkinson: Mushrooms, 1903, p. 184.
(15) Mcllvaine and Macadam: One Thousand American Fungi, 1900, p. 475.
(16) Hard: The Mushroom, edible and otherwise, 1908, p. 380.
(17) Mcllvaine and Macadam: One Thousand American Fungi, 1900, p. 93.
(18) Hard: The Mushroom, edible and otherwise, 1908, p. 104.
(19) Stevenson: British Fungi, 1886, vol. i, p. 78.
(20) Peck: Bulletin of the New York State Museum, no. 150, p. 43.
(21) Kobert: Lehrbuch der Intoxikationen, 1906, Bd. ii, 2, s. 1223, 1224.
(22) Harnack and Meyer: Arch. f. exp. Path. u. Pharmakol., 1880, Bd. 12, s. 366.