356

Ser.B, 2007,19(3):356-364

NUMERICAL PREDICTION OF DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE OF PELTON

TURBINE*

XIAO Ye-xiang, HAN Feng-qin, ZHOU Jing-lin, KUBOTA Takashi

College of Electric Power, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China,
E-mail: xiaoyx@scut.edu.cn

(Received November 3, 2006; Revised January 23, 2007)

ABSTRACT ： Different from the reaction turbines, the turbines[2-6]. The time-averaged steady
hydraulic performance of Pelton turbine is dynamic due to the performance prediction has little contribution to the
unsteady flow in the rotating buckets in time and space. The study of the negative scale effect of the Pelton
dynamic energy efficiency of bucket ηEB and power efficiency turbines[7].
of bucket ηPB within a short period can be predicted from the
dynamic flow pattern of the free-surface sheet flow in the
rotating bucket, whereas the dynamic discharge efficiency of
bucket ηQB is defined as the resident discharge in the bucket at
the respective moment. Under the operation of higher unit
speed nDH than the optimum one, the power efficiency of
bucket is deteriorated by the jet interference with the rear
surface of bucket ΔPrear at the first stage of the dynamic
performance, as well as the loss power due to the spilt flow
from the cutout of bucket at the later stage of performance.
Based on the dynamic performance prediction presented, the
future possibility of the quantitative investigation for the
negative scale effect of Pelton turbines was discussed.

KEY WORDS: dynamic energy efficiency, dynamic discharge

efficiency, dynamic power efficiency, rotating bucket, Pelton
turbine
1. INTRODUCTION
In a Pelton turbine, the rotating buckets
consecutively penetrate a water jet to have the
inflow under the atmospheric environment as
shown in Fig.1. In the figure, the three buckets
receive the different amount of water jet,
respectively[1]. The above unsteadiness in time and
space, even under the constant rotating speed, is the
main reason why the numerical prediction of its
performance is difficult compared with the reaction
Fig.1 Interaction of a jet to buckets
By applying the numerical approach of
animated-cartoon frames[1,8] to discretize the
analogous unsteady flow, it is possible to adopt the
usual angular momentum equation for the inlet and
outlet of the free-surface sheet flow in a bucket
under the respective frame[9,10]. Based on the
consecutive frame of flow analysis, the dynamic
performance of the specific hydraulic energy, the
relative discharge and the hydraulic power of
rotating bucket can be determined numerically[11].
The aim of this article is to present the numerical
procedure for acquiring the dynamic characteristics

* Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50379015).
Biography：XIAO Ye-xiang(1978-), Male, Ph. D. Student, Lecturer
 357

to investigate the negative scale effect of the Pelton The jet is discretized into multi-layers and
turbines. represented by the streamlines at the center of the
respective layer as shown in Fig.3. The jet enters
the splitter of bucket, then becomes the water sheet
2. NUMERICAL APPROACH TO PREDICT flow having the free-surface with the Inner Moving
DYNAMIC PERFORMANCE Boundary (IMB) and the Outer Moving Boundary
2.1 Numerical procedure of dynamic flow analysis (OMB) on the inner surface of bucket[15]. Figure 4
shows an example of the free-surface flow pattern
In order to predict the dynamic performance of
with the various depths on the upper half of rotating
the Pelton turbines, it is necessary to perform the
bucket[16,17]. The color of water sheet illustrates the
fundamental dynamic flow analysis of the rotating
distribution of water depth H in the flow pattern.
multi-buckets for a single jet. By applying the
On a relevant flow strip, all of the fluid particles
method of animated-cartoon frames[1], the
entered the bucket simultaneously[18].
fundamental flow analysis was executed for the
consecutive frames.
To consider the negative scale effect of the
Pelton turbines[7], the expansion of water jet along
the jet axis was modeled by introducing the radial
jet expansion rate kRj = (Rj–R0)/(Xj–X0), where R0,
and X0 is the jet radius and the axial position of jet
contraction, respectively, and Rj is the radius at the
position Xj as shown in Fig.1[12,13]. Under the
assumption of the constant kRj for the specific
operating condition, the dynamic jet radius RJ,i at
the entrance of the rotating bucket at a moment of Fig. 3 Fluid particle on bucket surface
Frame #i was computed for the position XJ,i as
follows:

RJ ,i = R0 + k Rj ( X J ,i − X 0 ) (1)

The dynamic jet velocity CJ,i at the relevant

entrance was computed from the contraction
velocity C0 as follows:
R0 2
CJ ,i = C0 ( ) (2)
RJ ,i Fig. 4 Free-surface flow pattern

The contraction jet data C0, R0, X0, and the
radius expansion rate kRj for the fundamental single
jet were numerically predicted from the
axi-symmetric two-phase flow analysis[14] as shown
in Fig. 2.
After the head of the water flow has reached
the brim, the water sheet flowed out of the brim of
bucket. The instantaneous specific hydraulic energy
Eijk, the relative discharge Δ Qijk, and the hydraulic
power Δ Pijk of a fluid Particle #k on the flow Strip
#
j in the water sheet flow in the rotating bucket at
the moment of Frame #i were computed from the
flow analysis data as follows[1]:

Eijk = U ijk Cuijk (3)

ΔQijk = Wijk Bnijk H ijk (4)

Fig.2 Jet contraction at nozzle outlet ΔPijk = Eijk ρΔQijk (5)

358

where Uijk, Cuijk, Wijk, Bnijk, and Hijk are the
peripheral speed, the absolute circumferential
velocity, the relative velocity, the breadth normal to
Wijk, and the depth of water sheet for the fluid
particle, respectively.
2.2 Numerical procedure of performance prediction
2.2.1 Jet energy and jet discharge
Under the constant specific hydraulic energy
ET of turbine, ET= gH, where H is the net head of
the turbine, and the fixed needle stroke Sn and the
instantaneous kinetic energy of free jet EJ,i at the
moment of Frame #i was computed as follows:
C J2,i
E J ,i = , (i < ilastIn ) (6a)
2 jet velocity C0 decreases under the constant
C J2,i _ lastIn
E J ,i = , (i > ilastIn ) (6b)
2
where CJ,i is the dynamic jet velocity at the splitter
position XJ,i according to Eqs. (1) and (2), and ilastIn
the frame at the last inflow to the bucket,
respectively. The turbine discharge per a single
nozzle Q0 was computed referring to the jet
contraction:
Q0 = C0π R02 (7)
2.2.2 Inflow discharge, power and specific energy
to bucket
The instantaneous inflow discharge Qin,i, the
power Pin,i and the specific energy Ein,i at the
moment of the relevant Frame #i were obtained by
integrating with the Particle #k along the Splitter #j,
respectively, as follows:
according to the equations similar to Eqs. (8) to
(10), respectively.
2.2.4 Cutflow discharge, power and specific energy
from bucket
If a part of water sheet flow in the bucket
spilled out of the cutout, the instantaneous cutflow
discharge Q cut ,i , the power P cut ,i and the specific
energy E cut ,i i at the moment of the relevant Frame
#
i were obtained by integrating with the Particle #k
along the Cutout #j according to the equations
similar to Eqs. (8) to (10), respectively.
2.2.5 Loss power with rear-interference and
discharge loss
In the operation of higher unit speed nDH, the
peripheral speed Uref, and the rear surface of bucket
pushes the trailing-edge of the retarded jet truncated
by the bucket. This rear-interference[19] at the
moment of the Frame #i was numerically acquired
by the instantaneous negative power Δ Prear,i
ΔVrear,i
ΔPrear,i = Ω ( ρ Ω Rrear,
2
i) (11)
Δt F
where Δ Vrear,i is the virtual volume of the jet
trailing-edge to be displaced by the rear surface,
Δt F the elapsed time per a frame, and Rrear,i the
rotating radius of the virtual volume, respectively,
as shown in Fig.5.

Qin,i = ∑ k (ΔQijk ) (8)

Pin ,i = ∑ k (ΔPijk ) (9)

Fig. 5 Loss power with rear-interference
P E ΔQ
Ein ,i = in ,i = ∑ k ijk ijk (10) Moreover, there is a possibility of the unsteady
ρ Qin ,i Qin ,i
discharge loss Δ Qjet due to the ineffective jet that
does not enter the bucket as shown in Fig.6. The
2.2.3 Outflow discharge, power and specific energy
amount of ΔQ jet was acquired through the
from bucket
The instantaneous outflow discharge Q out ,i , numerical analysis.
2.2.6 Dynamic performance EB, QB, and PB of a
the power P out ,i and the specific energy E out ,i at
B B B

rotating bucket
the moment of the relevant Frame #i were obtained At the moment of the relevant Frame #i, the
by integrating with the Particle #k along the Brim #j dynamic specific hydraulic energy EB,i of a bucket
 359

is η QB,i is defined based on the jet discharge Q0 as

follows:
EB ,i = Ein,i − Eout,i − Ecut,i , (i < ilastIn ) (12a)

ηQB ,i =
QB ,i
=
∑Q i in,i − ∑ i Qout,i − ∑ i Qcut,i
=
EB ,i = Ein,i_lastIn − Eout,i − Ecut,i , (i > ilastIn ) (12b) Q0 Q0

The dynamic residing discharge in a bucket

QB,i is ∑ q −∑ q
i in i out − ∑ i qcut (17)

QB ,i = ∑ i Qin,i − ∑ i Qout,i − ∑ i Qcut,i (13) where qin= ∑Q i in / Q 0 , are the non-dimensional

discharges, respectively.
and the dynamic hydraulic power of a bucket PB,i is The dynamic power efficiency η PB ,i of a
bucket is defined based on the bucket input power
PB ,i = Pin,i − Pout,i − Pcut,i − ΔPrear,i (14) EB ,i ρ QB ,i as follows:

The dynamic performance of a bucket for a

PB ,i Pin,i − Pout,i − Pcut,i − ΔPrear,i
single jet was obtained by computing Eqs. (12) to η PB ,i = = =
(14) from the Frame #0 at the first contact of the EB ,i ρ QB ,i EB ,i ρ QB ,i
splitter tip on the jet surface till the Frame #ilastOut at
the discharge of the last fluid particle from the pin − pout − pcut − Δprear (18)
bucket.
where pin= Pin,i/(EB,i ρ QB,i), is the non-dimensional
power.
The dynamic hydraulic efficiency ηhB ,i of a
bucket is

PB ,i EJ ,i EB ,i QB ,i PB ,i
ηhB ,i = = =
ET ρ Q0 ET EJ ,i Q0 EB ,i ρ QB ,i

Fig. 6 Unsteady discharge loss due to ineffective jet η J ,iη EB ,iηQB ,iη PB ,i (19)

2.2.7 Dynamic efficiency of Pelton turbine At the moment of the relevant Frame #i, the
The dynamic jet efficiency η J ,i instantaneous three or four buckets are simultaneously interacting
at the Frame #i is with a single jet as shown in Fig.1. The dynamic
hydraulic efficiency η hT,i of the Pelton turbine was
E J ,i computed by integrating the respective bucket
η J ,i = (15)
ET efficiency η hB,i in Eq. (19) for the whole relevant
buckets in a runner.
The dynamic energy efficiency η EB,i of a
bucket is defined based on the jet energy EJ,i at the 2.2.8 Time-averaged overall efficiencies and
entrance of bucket as follows: deficiencies in Pelton turbine
In order to get the time-averaged overall
E B ,i Ein,i − Eout,i − Ecut,i efficiency of the Pelton turbine, the dynamic
η EB ,i = = = ein − eout − ecut hydraulic power PB,i of a bucket in Eq. (14) was
E J ,i E J ,i
integrated to get the power PR,i of a runner and
(16) time-averaged to obtain the overall output power PT.
where ein=Ein,i/EJ,i, etc. are the non-dimensional By applying the usual turbine energy ET and the
specific hydraulic energies, respectively. turbine discharge QT specified in the IEC model
The dynamic discharge efficiency of a bucket acceptance code, the time-averaged overall
360
efficiency η hT of the turbine is
PT
ηhT =
ET ρ QT
Corresponding to the dynamic jet efficiency η J,i,
the dynamic jet deficiency δ J,i is
ET − EJ ,i
δ J , i = 1 − η J ,i =
ET
The deficiency includes the hydraulic losses in
the distributing pipe with the branches, in the
nozzle/needle, and in the free jet from the nozzle
throat to the entrance of bucket at the moment of
Frame #i. The dynamic energy deficiency δ EB ,i of
a bucket was determined from Eq. (16) as follows:
E J ,i − E B ,i Ecut,i
δ EB ,i = 1 − η EB ,i = = (22)
E J ,i E J ,i
At the moment when the relative cutflow
velocity Wcut.i has the similar direction as the
peripheral speed Ucut,i, the absolute cutflow velocity
Cucut,i is large, resulting in the large cutflow
deficiency δ EB ,i .The dynamic discharge deficiency
of a bucket δ QB ,i was directly determined from Eq.
(17):
ΔQjet
δ QB ,i = 1 − ηQB ,i =
Q0
The dynamic power deficiency δ PB ,i of a
bucket was determined from Eq. (18) as follows:
ΔPrear,i
δ PB ,i = 1 − η PB ,i =
EB ,i ρ QB ,i
The dynamic hydraulic deficiency δ hB ,i of a
bucket is approximately
δ hB ,i = 1 − ηhB ,i ≈ δ J ,i + δ EB ,i + δ QB ,i + δ PB ,i
The dynamic hydraulic deficiency of the
Pelton turbine was computed with the sum of four
component deficiencies of Eqs. (20) to (23) at the
moment of Frame #i.
(20)
3. NUMERICAL RESULTS OF DYNAMIC
PERFORMANCE PREDICTION
3.1 Numerical setup
A Pelton runner having the geometrical
specific speed B/Dref of 0.35 with 18 buckets was
chosen to be the numerical analysis, where B is the
bucket inner breadth and Dref the reference runner
(21) diameter. Under the optimum unit speed nDH = 40
rpm, the needle stroke Sn/Rt was set to 0.892 where
Rt is the nozzle tip radius, and the jet radius
expansion rate was assumed as kRj = 0.05 %. The
value of kRj varied with nDH, 0.2 % for 30 rpm and
50 rpm[13]. The infinitesimal rotating angle Δθ F
per a frame was set to the 1.0o by equally dividing a
pitch angle between the two buckets into 20 frames.
The Frame #i corresponds to the rotational angle of
Δθi = i* ΔθF in space, and simultaneously
Δti = i* ΔθF / Ω in time. Hereunder, the Frame #i
is used as the abscissa in the dynamic curve of the
performances.
3.2 Dynamic discharge efficiency of bucket
At the optimum unit speed nDH = 40 rpm as
shown in Fig. 7 (b), the non-dimensional inflow
discharge qin= Qin/Q0 to the bucket rapidly increases
with increasing penetration of bucket to the jet up to
the Frame #14. The full jet enters the bucket
during the frames from Frame #14 to Frame #43.
The inflow decreases from Frame #43 to Frame #60
due to the penetration of the following bucket to the
jet. The outflow discharge qout = Qout/Q0 from the
(23)
bucket has the similar locus as that of qin with the
time shift of flowing in the bucket from the splitter
to the brim. There is a small amount of cutflow
qcut = Qcut/Q0 out of the cutout during the frames
between Frame #60 and Frame #80. The discharge
efficiency of bucket η QB = QB/Q0 implies, by
B
(24) definition with Eq. (17), the amount of discharge
residing in the bucket at the every moment, and
reaches the maximum of 13.5 times of the jet
discharge Q0. Since all of the jets enter the bucket,
there is no discharge loss δ QB ,i =Qjet/Q0 due to the
ineffective jet.
When the unit speed is lower than the
(25) optimum as shown in Fig. 7 (a), the jet velocity
becomes higher under the constant peripheral speed.
All of the dynamic discharges happen within the
shorter frames without the occurrence of qcut. The

discharge efficiency η QB of bucket decreases to
11.2. There is no discharge loss due to the
ineffective jet.
Fig. 7 Dynamic discharge efficiency
In the case of higher unit speed as shown in
Fig. 7 (c), it takes more time to inflow and outflow
with decreasing jet velocity. The amount of
cutflow, as well as the amount of unsteady
discharge loss Δ Qjet due to the ineffective jet
increase with increasing nDH.
3.3 Dynamic energy efficiency of bucket
At the optimum unit speed as shown in Fig. 8
(b), the dynamic jet efficiency η J,i = Cj,i2/(2ET)
slightly decreases with increasing flow distance due
to the small expansion of jet toward downstream,
kRj = 0.05 %. On the contrary, the
non-dimensional inflow energy ein = Ein,i/EJ,i tends
to increase with frames, because the splitter tends to
be perpendicular to the jet with its rotation. After
the frame of the last inflow to the Bucket #60, both
the jet efficiency and the inflow energy are assumed
to be constant irrespective of the frame. The
outflow energy eout=Eout,i/EJ,i has the negative value
361
because the outflow emerges from the brim in the
reverse direction to the rotation of bucket. The
amount of the cutflow energy ecut = Ecut,i/EJ,i is not
negligible due to the large circumferential
component Cucut of the cutflow velocity. The
variation of dynamic energy efficiency η EB of the
bucket, η EB = EB/EJ,i is not remarkable.
B
When the unit speed is lower than the
optimum as shown in Fig. 8 (a), the dynamic jet
efficiency η J ,i decreases rapidly due to the
increased expansion rate kRj = 0.2 %. The inflow
energy ein = (Uin,i Cuin,i)/(CJ,i2/2) ≈ Uin,i/CJ,i tends
to decrease with increasing CJ. The absolute value
of the negative outflow energy eout is larger because
of the larger outflow velocity. There is no cutflow
energy ecut due to the absence of cutflow discharge.
Fig. 8 Dynamic energy efficiency
In the case of higher unit speed as shown in
Fig. 8 (c), the dynamic jet efficiency η J,i decreases
more rapidly due to the more increased expansion
rate kRj = 0.2 % for nDH = 50rpm. The level of the
inflow energy ein increases with increasing nDH.
362
The absolute value of the negative outflow energy
eout becomes smaller, and turns to be positive
because of the higher positive component of the
outflow velocity. The cutflow energy ecut becomes
very large with increasing nDH.
3.4 Dynamic power efficiency of bucket
At the optimum unit speed as shown in Fig. 9
(b), the non-dimensional inflow power pin=
Pin,i/(EB,i ρ QB,i) to the bucket is very large (out of
scale close to 1.0) at the beginning stage of frames
due to the small denominator, and decreases toward
zero at the frame of the last inflow. The outflow
power pout is negative corresponding to the negative
outflow energy eout, and sharply increases from the
Frame #77 to the last outflow from Bucket #91 due
to the small positive eout. There is a small amount
of cutflow power pcut during the frames between
Frame #60 and Frame #80. The dynamic power
efficiency η PB of the bucket η PB = PB/(EBI, ρ QB,i)
B
rapidly decreases with frames down to the negative
value due to the large positive pout.
Fig. 9 Dynamic power efficiency
When the unit speed is lower than the
optimum as shown in Fig. 9 (a), the dynamic power
efficiency η PB,i once decreases with decreasing pin,
and turns to increase by the decrease of pout. There
is no cutflow power pcut.
In the case of higher unit speed as shown in
Fig. 9 (c), the rear-interference power deficiency
δ PB,I = Δ Prear,i/(EB,i QB,i) occurs in the first stage.
The amount of cutflow power pcut increases with
increasing nDH. As a result, the dynamic power
efficiency η PB,i is damaged by the rear-interference
power deficiency δ PB,i at the first stage and by the
cutflow power deficiency at the last stage of
Frames.
3.5 Dynamic hydraulic efficiency of Pelton turbine
According to Eqs. (15) and (16), the product of
η J and ηEB gives the energy efficiency η E of
turbine as follows:
EB ,i
η E ,i = = η J ,iηEB ,i (26)
ET
The dynamic energy efficiencies η E of the
turbine for the various nDH are summarized in the
upper part of Fig. 10. The final stage of the
dynamic curves for nDH of 50 is deteriorated by the
serious cutflow. The dynamic behavior of the
hydraulic efficiency ηhB of a bucket is
summarized in the lower part of Fig. 10. The
deterioration of the dynamic efficiency at lower nDH
is small, on the contrary, its deterioration is serious
with nDH higher than the optimum due to the
dynamic rear-interference power deficiency δ PB ,
the dynamic discharge deficiency δ QB due to the
ineffective jet, and the dynamic cutflow power
deficiency pcut even under the single jet operation.
Fig. 10 Dynamic hydraulic efficiency

Those deficiencies have the tendency to
increase with increasing Reynolds number, and
become more serious in the multi-nozzle Pelton
turbines[20]. The quantitative study of those dynamic
deficiencies will be the urgent future task to clarify
the negative scale effect of the Pelton turbines.
The performance equations presented are not yet
elegant, nevertheless, may be a milestone for the
dynamic performance prediction considering the
negative scale effect.
Fig. 11 Dynamic water flow in model test of Pelton turbine
3.6 Time-averaged overall efficiency ηhT of
turbine
The hydraulic performance of this Pelton
turbine was resulted from model experiment. At the
optimum unit speed as shown in Fig.11(b), the
absolute outflow velocity is close to zero. When the
unit speed is lower than the optimum as shown in
363
Fig.11(a), the absolute outflow velocity is very
large and its direction is opposite to jet. In the case
of higher unit speed as shown in Fig.11(c), besides
the outflow, there are cutflow and ineffective jet
within it.
In Table 1, the computational results are
compared with the experimental results for the
time- averaged overall efficiency ηhT at different
nDH. The errors between the computed and
experimental results for the various nDH are about
1.2%, 1.4% and 2.1%, respectively. In the case of
lower nDH, the key factor to decrease the efficiency
is the shorter residence of water flow in the open
bucket. On the contrary, in the case of higher nDH,
the rear-interference, the ineffective jet and cutflow
cause the efficiency deterioration rapidly.
Table 1 Comparison of time-averaged overall efficiency 
ηhT
Unit speed 30 rpm 40 rpm 50 rpm
Computational result 80.6% 92.4% 80.3%
Experimental results 81.7% 91.1% 78.6%
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS
The fundamental equations of dynamic
hydraulic performance have been derived for the
Pelton turbine under the single jet operation through
the flow analysis based on the animated-cartoon
frame method. As a result of the dynamic
performance prediction for the various unit speed
nDH under the optimum needle stroke, the following
conclusions can be reached.
(1) The smaller efficiency decrease at the
lower nDH is mainly resulted from the shorter
residence of water flow in the open bucket.
(2) On the contrary, the larger efficiency
deterioration at the higher nDH is due to the
rear-interference deficiency in the first stage, the
discharge deficiency due to the ineffective jet, and
the cutflow deficiency due to the spilt flow from the
cutout of the bucket in the last stage of the dynamic
performance.
(3) The ineffective jet and the cutflow may
introduce the jet interference in the multi-nozzle
Pelton turbines.
(4) The three dynamic deficiencies are the key
words for the negative scale effect of the Pelton
turbines.
364
REFERENCES
[1] KUBOTA T., XIA J., TAKEUCHI H. et al. Numerical
analysis of free water sheet flow on Pelton buckets[C].
Proceedings of 19th IAHR-Symposium. Singapore,
1998, 316-329.
[2] BERNTSEN G., BREKKE H., HAUGEN J. et al.
Analysis of the free surface non-stationary flow in a
Pelton turbine[J]. International Journal on
Hydropower and Dams, 2001, 8(6) :79- 84.
[3] LIU Shi-he, DUAN Hong-dong. Simulation of the
atomized flow by slit type bucket energy dissipater[J].
Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B , 2005 ,17 (6) :758-
763.
[4] DENG Jian, REN An-lu, ZOU Jian-feng. Numerical
simulation of three-dimensional vortex dynamics in
wake of a circular cylinder[J]. Journal of
Hydrodynamics, Ser. B , 2005, 17(3) :344- 351.
[5] WANG Fu-jun, LI Yao-jun, CONG Guo-hui et al. CFD
simulation of 3D flow in large-bore axial-flow pump
with half-elbow suction sump[J]. Journal of
Hydrodynamics, Ser. B , 2006 ,18 (2) :243- 247.
[6] HUANG Zhen-yu, MIAO Guo-ping. Matrix-free
implicit method for incompressible flow around 3D
complex underwater bodies[J]. Journal of
Hydrodynamics, Ser. B , 2006 ,18 (2) :192- 198.
[7] KUBOTA T., HAN Feng-qin. Performance conversion
considering scale effect for Pelton turbines[C].
Proceedings of 19st IAHR Symposium. Singapore,
1998, 46-58.
[8] HAN Feng-qin, KUBOTA T., LIU Jie.Numerical
simulation of unsteady flow on Pelton buckets[J].
Journal of Huazhong University of Science and
Technology, 2000, 28(11): 14-16 (in Chinese).
[9] NAKANISHI Y., KUBOTA T., XIA J. Numerical
simulation of water sheet flow on Pelton buckets (1st
report, discretization of unsteady flow using animated
cartoon method) [J]. Transactions of the Japan Society
of Mechanical Engineers, Part B, 1997,
63(615):3617-3622 (in Japanese).
[10] DAI Hui-chao, LIU Yu-ling, WEI Wen-li. Simulation of
strong turbulence flow with free surface including the
effects of streamline curvature [J]. Journal of
Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2005, 17 (5):629-635.
[11] DUBAS M. Some theoretical considerations on energy
exchange in Pelton turbines[J]. International Journal
on Hydropower and Dams, 1995, 2(1) :28- 32.
[12] LIU Jie, HAN Feng-qin, KUBOTA T. et al. Effect of
free jet enlargement on the bucket flow in Pelton turbine
[C]. Proceedings of 21st IAHR Symposium. Lausanne,
Switzerland, 2002, 97-103.
[13] LIU Jie, WEI Cai-xin, HAN Feng-qin. Effect of enlarged
free jet on energy conversion in Pelton turbine [J].
Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2006,18(2):
211-218.
[14] HAN Feng-qin, XIAO Ye-xiang, KUBOTA T. et al.
Study on the contraction mechanism of free jet[J].
Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2004, 25(3):
421-423 (in Chinese).
[15] XIAO Ye-xiang, HAN Feng-qin, KUBOTA T.
Mechanism of unsteady free water sheet flow on Pelton
bucket surface[J].Journal of South China University
of Technology (Natural Science), 2006,34(4):75-79,90
(in Chinese).
[16] HAN Feng-qin, XIAO Ye-xiang, KUBOTA T.
Numerical simulation of free water sheet flow on Pelton
bucket using 3-D body-fitted coordinate systems[J].
Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 2006, 27(4):
601-603 (in Chinese).
[17] XIAO Ye-xiang, HAN Feng-qin, KUBOTA T.
Hydraulic gradient in free surface flow on rotating
bucket of Pelton turbine[C]. The 8th Asia International
Conference on Fluid Machinery. China, Yichang,
2005, 323-330.
[18] PARKINSON E., VULLIOUD G., GEPPERT L. et al.
Analysis of Pelton turbine flow patterns for improved
runner-component interaction[J]. International Journal
on Hydropower and Dams, 2002, 9(5) :100-103.
[19] ZHENG Ai-ling, HAN Feng-qin, XIAO Ye-xiang et al.
Unsteady interference between free water jet and rear
surface of rotating buckets in Pelton turbine[C]. The 8th
Asia International Conference on Fluid Machinery.
Yichang, China, 2005, 302-310.
[20] NAKANISHI Y., KUBOTA T., FUKUI M. Jet
interference in multi-nozzle Pelton turbines (2nd report,
prediction of jet interference intensity with relative jet
path considering the velocity decay) [J]. Transactions
of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part B,
1995 ,61 (591) :3939- 3944(in Japanese).