Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by acknowledging that slavery was a crime against humanity and compensating the
victims’ families?
*Can you narrow down your thesis statement and make the claim more specific?
*Which 3 arguments?
*Counter-argument and rebuttal?
*How do you cite?
*Can you think of a catchy hook?
*Can you describe the setting of this controversy?
*Which main point do you want to make? What is your purpose?
*Who is your audience?
*Can you think of a call for action?
*Can you think of a creative title?
TRC chair Murray Sinclair in a statement in May. Other survivors spoke of infants
fathered by priests at the school, taken from their mothers at birth and thrown into
furnaces, he said. In 2015, it was estimated some 6,000 children had died while at
residential schools. So far, more than 4,100 children have been identified. "We know
there are lots of sites similar to Kamloops that are going to come to light in the
future," Mr Sinclair said. "We need to begin to prepare ourselves for that."
What has been done?
In 2015, the TRC issued 94 calls to action, including six recommendations regarding
missing children and burial grounds. Prime Minister Trudeau promised to "fully
implement" all of them.
• According to a running count by the CBC, 10 of the projects have been
completed, 64 are in progress and 20 have not begun
• The TRC, struck in 2009, fought for the issue of unmarked burial sites to be
included in its mandate
• In 2019, the government committed C$33.8m ($28m; £19.8m) over three
years to develop and maintain a school student death register and set up an
online registry of residential school cemeteries
• So far, the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation says it has received
just a fraction of this money
What has been the reaction?
In June, Mr Trudeau said he was "appalled" by Canada's legacy of residential
schools and pledged "concrete action" - but provided few details.
"Trudeau has been willing to move on this, he's got a lot of words, but we really need
to see action," Ms Scott said. Ms Scott, along with Chief Bellegarde and other
Indigenous leaders, have pressed the government for a thorough investigation of all
130 former school sites to find any unmarked graves. These children have been
"discarded", Chief Bellegarde said. "That's not acceptable."
First Nations community members gather for a vigil in Marieval after a discovery of
unmarked graves - MAGE COPYRIGHT GETTY IMAGES
The discoveries also cast a shadow over the country's 1 July Canada Day holiday.
Municipalities across Canada called off celebrations this year in recognition of the
findings.
The preliminary findings have also renewed demands for an apology from the
Catholic Church - one of the calls to action in the TRC report.
In 2017, Mr Trudeau asked Pope Francis to apologise for the church's role in running
Canada's residential schools - but the church has so far declined. The United,
Anglican and Presbyterian churches issued formal apologies in the 1980s and
1990s. An apology from the Catholic church would be "healing", said Chief
Bellegarde. "It's part of closing that wound." News of the BC discovery spurred a
global response, prompting statements from Human Rights Watch and the United
Nations.
Canada’s government needs to face up to its role in Indigenous children’s
deaths
It’s time for ministers to stop consigning the residential schools scandal to a ‘dark
history’, and deal with ongoing injustices
Ground-penetrating sonar found the children’s bodies that the survivors of Canada’s
“residential schools” always knew were there. For more than a century, these
schools functioned as re-education camps run by the Canadian government and
Catholic church to assimilate Indigenous children. Children were raped, locked in
chicken coops, shocked in an electric chair, subject to medical experiments, confined
by electric fences and all too often dug the graves of other children who were buried
in unmarked graves. This happened under the cover of the Bible, while the Canadian
government promoted itself as a bastion of human rights.
More than 1,000 unmarked children’s graves have been discovered at former
residential schools. Why was the truth buried for so long? The answer lies in the
weaponisation of history. In his presidential address to the Royal Society of Canada
in 1922, Duncan Campbell Scott, the Canadian civil servant who ran the residential
schools at their peak between 1913 and 1932, noted that historians had a “duty and
obligation to accept no statement without documentary evidence”. For years, the
Canadian government mounted a potent colonial propaganda campaign that was
abetted by the churches to cover up wrongdoing. Leading perpetrators in the
residential school scandal were exalted in history books while statues of them were
erected in prominent places. Meanwhile, Indigenous peoples were dehumanised,
ensuring that any leaked reports or evidence of wrongdoing would receive little
attention.
The Canadian government is now doubling down on the narrative that the residential
schools are part of its “dark history”. This detracts from ongoing injustices in the
present day, such as its litigation against First Nations children and residential school
survivors in court. The Catholic church has sent prayers, but has refused to issue a
papal apology or make proper financial reparations to survivors and disclose
residential school records.
For years, the Canadian government promoted the myth that “people back then did
not know better”. Yet there were whistleblowers who had attempted to raise the
alarm. In the same year that Scott gave his address to the Royal Society of Canada,
the public health physician Peter Bryce published The Story of A National Crime, a
report detailing Scott’s stonewalling of public health measures in residential schools,
where child death rates were 25% a year. Bryce had been raising the alarm since
1907, when his first report linking inequalities in Indian public health and terrible
health practices in residential schools to prolific death rates was leaked to the
newspapers.
Bryce refused to stay silent, despite the efforts of the church and the Canadian
government to discredit him. So the government erased Bryce and others like him
from history, ensuring there was no mention of Bryce or his report in school
curriculum. He was buried in Canada’s national Beechwood cemetery; for decades,
only his family visited his grave.
Bryce was not the only whistleblower. Children in the “schools” pleaded for help too.
A 1923 letter written by little Edward B to his parents said the boys in the schools
were so hungry that they were eating cats and wheat. His letter found its way to
Scott, who responded that “99% of the children in the schools were too fat anyway”.
Scott was initially acclaimed by the government of Canada as a loyal public servant
and confederate poet. But as the children who survived the residential schools
summoned the strength to tell their truths, Bryce’s report resurfaced alongside the
reports of hundreds of other whistleblowers. Scott’s image was slowly tarnished, but
the rust only set in when the children’s bodies were found. In fact, until just a few
weeks ago, the government of Canada website listed Scott as a “Person of National
Significance” for being an “advocate for education”. This is despite the fact that Scott
himself admitted that “50% of the children who passed through these schools did not
live to benefit from the education which they had received therein”.
As historians try to educate Canadians and peel back the colonial propaganda that
allowed the truth of Canada’s residential schools to go unexamined for so long,
others are taking matters into their own hands by burning churches and removing
colonial statues. In 2015, after the Truth and Reconciliation Commission released its
final report documenting the horrors of the “schools,” a plaque was unveiled beside
Bryce’s gravesite in Beechwood Cemetery. Duncan Campbell Scott is buried there
too; a year later a historical plaque with the phrases “confederate poet” and “cultural
genocide” was revealed. The aim of these plaques is to give proper weight to the
historical legacies of these individuals. The historical research behind the plaques
informed the school curriculum, and now Bryce’s grave is one of the most visited in
Beechwood.
In 2013, Bryce was mentioned in legal proceedings against the Canadian
government for discriminatory underfunding of First Nations children’s public
services. In 2016, a legal ruling was issued ordering the government to cease its
discriminatory conduct Government ministers welcomed the decision but have done
little to fix the problem. It has taken 19 further orders and counting to get Canada
closer to ending the inequities in First Nations children’s public services that Bryce
pointed to 114 years ago. But the people who were unheard are now coming
forward. It’s long past time to listen, make reparations and end the injustices and
propaganda that led to the deaths of so many young children.
Cindy Blackstock, a member of the Gitxsan First Nation, is the executive director of
the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society and professor at McGill University.
Pamela Palmater, a member of Ugpi’ganjig (Eel River Bar First Nation), is professor
and chair in indigenous governance at Ryerson University
Practice Topic 2 China’s Silk Road: a form of neo-colonialism?
Chinese President Xi Jinping believes the revival of the spirit of Silk Road will
strengthen China's commercial tentacles and its soft power. But not everyone
agrees with him.
The initiative covers more than half of the world's population and a total infrastructure
investment need of around 5 trillion dollars. (TRT World and Agencies)
Last week, China delayed its 1.1 billion-dollar investment in a Sri Lankan port to build
an industrial zone after hundreds of people protested against being evicted from their
land.
The investment formed part of China's modern-day Silk Road project, that President
Xi Jinping calls the "One Belt, One Road" (OBOR) initiative.
But some people are worried that the project might represent a new kind of
colonialism.
Similar scenes occurred in Bangladesh early this month. One person was killed and
a dozen others were injured in a protest against a Chinese-backed power plant in the
capital of Dhaka. (TRT World and Agencies)
"We are against leasing the lands where people live and do their farming, while there
are identified lands for an industrial zone. When you give away such a vast area of
land, you can't stop the area becoming a Chinese colony," DV Chanaka, a local
politician in Sri Lanka said.
Sri Lankan Buddhist monks in Ambalantota also protested against the project. The
banner reads "peaceful protest against selling of Hambantota port and land
grabbing. (TRT World and Agencies)
But authorities argue that the partnership arrangement with China is necessary to fix
Sri Lanka's economy.
Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe blamed the country's debt on former president
Mahinda Rajapaksa, whose government was friendly to Beijing.
He said the industrial zone was necessary to make the port and the nearby Chinese-
financed airport, also running at a heavy loss, viable.
"The port can't be taken away," Wickremesinghe said, adding that his country's
former British colonial rulers did not take away the Trincomalee harbor or the
Colombo port.
The Chinese economy contributes more than 30 percent to the global economic
growth. (TRT World and Agencies)
What is the OBOR?
Xi revealed the OBOR initiative in 2013, a year after he came in power.
It's an intercontinental trade and infrastructure project that opens up new land and
sea routes for Chinese goods. The project includes building roads, railways, ports
and other links and conjures the spirit of the ancient Silk Road back.
Silk Road was an international commercial line where the globalisation started. But it
became unusable due to wars. (TRT World and Agencies)
The revival of the Silk Road is a central feature of Xi's grand foreign policy.
The Chinese leader believes it would strengthen China's commercial tentacles and
its soft power by binding the country with more than 60 countries around Europe, the
Middle East and Africa.
"The initiative aims to achieve complementary advantages, narrow down the
development gap among regions, speed up the process of regional integration so as
to realize joint development and common prosperity among Asian and European
countries and related regions," Wang Yi, China's Foreign Minister said.
China plans to
invest a 4 trillion dollars in OBOR countries. (European Parliament)
What has been done so far?
Companies in China have mobilized to kick-off trading in OBOR countries. Besides,
many big state owned enterprises have an OBOR department.
Wang Yi announced that the country will organize a summit forum on OBOR in
Beijing in May. "We believe the forum will be a great success and make the initiative
better serve the world," he said.
China in Africa: win-win development, or a new colonialism?
By Nick Van Mead in Bagamoyo, 31 Jul 2018
Fishermen near Bagamoyo, Tanzania. In 10 years the sleepy fishing villages here
could be razed to create space for Africa’s largest port. Photograph: Gideon
Mendel/Corbis/Getty
The tiny fishing village of Bagamoyo is set to become Africa’s largest port in a $10bn
Chinese development. Are locals right to be optimistic? As their hand-built wooden
dhow approaches the shore, Ibrahim Chamume and his fellow fishermen take in the
sail and prepare to sell their catch to the small huddle of villagers waiting on the
white sand. He has been making a living like this on the Indian Ocean since he was
14. His father was a fisherman, too.
Now in his 30s, Ibrahim says earning enough from traditional fishing is tough, but
has its compensations. There is the view across the tranquil lagoon to the mangrove
swamps; the unspoiled beaches and bays; the lush vegetation and smallholdings
growing maize, cassava, cashews and mango. Such scenes must have played out in
the tiny Tanzanian village of Mlingotini for centuries.
The new colonialism: China’s BRI or Silk Road project is coming to be seen
across Asia as the road to ruin
Nayan Chanda in TOI, August 24, 2018
Five years ago, amid great fanfare, the Chinese president launched the new Silk
Road project, since then termed the Belt and Road Initiative. The massive
infrastructure project, involving 78 countries and $1.2 trillion in investment, was said
to have been inspired by the ancient Silk Road Spirit of “peace and cooperation,
openness and inclusiveness, mutual learning and mutual benefit.” It was thus a bit of
a shock to hear Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad -– standing in Beijing’s
Great Hall of the People – call BRI a “a new version of colonialism”. He even
compared the Chinese-Malaysian deal with “unequal treaties” that Britain had
imposed on China after the Opium War. The ripple of Mahathir exemplifying the
growing concern about non-transparent deals of BRI is likely to be felt far and wide.
Mahathir announced the cancellation of the $23 billion rail and pipeline project as he
feared it would place his country under a crippling debt burden. In fact, risk among
some of the BRI loan recipient countries has grown enough for the managing
director of IMF to issue a warning. The latest example of the danger is Sri Lanka
which, unable to pay off its debt, handed over an entire port to China for 99 years.
China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, the flagship of China’s Silk Road project costing
some $60 billion, has now brought Pakistan perilously close to a balance of
payments crisis. Left with foreign exchange worth two months of imports Pakistan is
close to seeking an IMF bailout, which would not only require painful structural
reform but hurt the Chinese project by forcing the revelation of terms of agreement.
Meanwhile US secretary of state Mike Pompeo has warned that the US would
oppose an IMF bailout. Pakistan also would not have missed a Pentagon report last
week that stated, “countries participating in BRI could develop economic
dependence on Chinese capital, which China could leverage to achieve its interests.”
Malaysia has now unveiled the closed bidding benefiting Chinese companies, not to
mention import of Chinese labour. They also found shoddy planning that condemned
the railroad to be a losing concern. More shocking, the BRI invested money was
siphoned off to a corruption-ridden Malaysian state fund. There is growing concern in
other countries. Indonesia’s $5.5 billion Jakarta-Bandung rail project has stalled over
concerns about its high cost. Myanmar and Nepal too have slowed down Chinese-
backed infrastructure projects. According to US-based consultancy RWR Advisory
Group, some 14% of the Chinese-invested BRI projects have run into trouble
because of various concerns.
In Pakistan, where China has invested $62 billion to build road, energy and power
networks, its projects have raised concerns. While much of the details of bidding in
CPEC projects remain opaque they have brought in a flood of Chinese workers. In
addition to workers brought in by companies many enterprising Chinese have come
on their own thanks to a bundle of 30,000 visas that were granted. Over the years
their presence has begun to cause social problems and provoke security threats.
Although Pakistan has deployed 15,000 military personnel as part of the Special
Security Division to protect BRI projects, it is impossible to guard every Chinese
national working in the country. Since 2014 some 44 Chinese citizens are reported to
have been killed – some by Islamist militants and others by Baluchis.
The fact that massive Chinese investment in Gwadar deep water port in Balochistan
and highways linking it to China brought benefits mainly to China and in a small
measure, to the federal government has provoked Baluchi nationalist anger. One
report says over 90% of the revenue from Gwadar port would go to the Chinese
operators and most of the power generated in the province would go to China. It is
not hard to see why Baluchis are angry and Mahathir sees China’s new Silk Road
project as a road to ruin.
Practice Topic 3 The Dutch government should take more action to ensure a safe
environment for all journalists lest we become a second America
In a joint statement, two experts on freedom of expression - David Kaye, who was
appointed by the UN human rights council, and Edison Lanza, who holds the
corresponding position at the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, said:
“These attacks run counter to the country’s obligations to respect press freedom and
international human rights law.”
Trump’s attacks “are strategic, designed to undermine confidence in reporting and
raise doubts about verifiable facts”, they added, while noting the president “has failed
to show even once that specific reporting has been driven by any untoward
motivations”.
“We are especially concerned that these attacks increase the risk of journalists being
targeted with violence.” The rebuke comes as Trump has intensified his criticism of
the media and appeared to embrace the hostile attitude among his supporters
towards members of the press.
The president unleashed a Twitter tirade against the media on Sunday, labeling
reporters as “unpatriotic”.
The Dutch state broadcaster has removed its logo from outside broadcast vans as
politicians complained of a steep rise in threats and the national counter-terrorism
agency warned of a heightened risk of far-right violence in the Netherlands.
The broadcaster, NOS, said it had been forced to take the unprecedented step
because “almost daily, journalists and technicians on the road to report are
confronted with verbal abuse, garbage is thrown, vans are blocked [and] people
bang on their sides or urinate on them”.
Attempt to murder Dutch reporter – “even in a country ranked 6th in the press
freedom index!”
John de Wit, RSF, July 7, 2021
Following the arrests of three suspects in last night’s shooting attack on crime
reporter Peter R. de Vries in the heart of Amsterdam, Reporters Without Borders
(RSF) calls on the Dutch authorities to conduct a swift and thorough investigation
and to protect journalists who could be targeted by organised crime, so that this
murder attempt does not have a chilling effect on journalism.
Peter R. De Vries was badly injured in the attack, which occurred shortly after he
participated in an RTL Boulevard TV program about a criminal case. A specialist in
covering crime for more than 40 years, this veteran reporter enjoys a great deal of
respect in both the journalistic community and Dutch public. At the same time, he
has received threats from within organised crime circles in connection with his
coverage of both old and ongoing cases. The police said they have detained three
suspects in the shooting.
“The attempted murder of Peter R. de Vries shows the scale of the increase in
threats against journalists in Europe” RSF secretary-general Christophe Deloire said.
“It is staggering to see that such an attack can be carried out in one of the countries
where press freedom is guaranteed most, the Netherlands being ranked 6th in RSF’s
World Press Freedom Index. Deloire added: “We ask the Dutch authorities to
conduct a swift and thorough investigation and to guarantee the protection of
journalists who could be targeted by organised crime. Everything possible must be
done to prevent this cowardly attack from having a chilling effect on journalists.”
Deliberate killings of journalists have become more frequent in the European Union
in recent years. After the murders of Daphne Caruana Galizia in Malta in 2017 and
Jan Kuciak in Slovakia in 2018, Greek crime reporter Giorgios Karaivaz was
murdered in Athens in April.
Assailant fires five rounds from close range in attack family describe as ‘worst
nightmare’
The shooting took place in the vicinity of the Leidseplein, a local hub of restaurants
and bars, and police immediately began gathering forensic evidence, interviewing
eyewitnesses and downloading video footage from surveillance cameras.
YouTube said it had removed “hundreds” of videos of the immediate aftermath of the
attack and arrival of emergency services.
Amsterdam police chief Frank Pauw said two men had been arrested after a suspect
car was stopped on the A4 motorway near Leidschendam on the outskirts of The
Hague. He said officers believed one might be the gunman.
The two were described as a 21-year-old man living in Rotterdam and a 35-year-old
Polish national living in Maurik, east of Rotterdam. They’re to appear in court on
Friday.
A third suspect, an 18-year-old man arrested as the manhunt got under way in
Amsterdam, was released without charge.
Award winner
After the Heineken kidnap, Peter De Vries wrote a novel which became a film,
Kidnapping Freddy Heineken, starring Anthony Hopkins.
He won an Emmy Award for his investigation into the disappearance of Natalee
Holloway, an American teenager who disappeared on the Dutch Caribbean island of
Aruba in 2005.
Recently, De Vries has been an “adviser” to Nabil B, a witness in the high-security
trial of Ridouan Taghi, arrested in Dubai in 2019 in connection with a string of drugs-
related killings – including the shooting dead of Nabil B’s lawyer, Derk Wiersum, the
same year.
With the country on tenterhooks, acting prime minister Mark Rutte described the
attack as “shocking and inconceivable”, while acting justice minister Ferd
Grapperhaus said it was “a black day” for freedom of the press.
Amsterdam’s mayor, Femke Halsema, condemned the “cowardly and brutal attack”.
EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen described investigative journalism
as “an asset for democracies”.
The National Union of Journalists said violence against journalists had to be taken
more seriously by governments.
The latest Freedom of the Press report has rated the press in the Netherlands as the
equal freest in the world, along with those of Sweden and Norway.
Across the world, on the other hand, press freedom has fallen to its lowest point in
over a decade, with set-backs to the open reporting of news by journalists apparent
in most continents. The world’s worst-rated countries were Belarus, Cuba, Equatorial
Guinea, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.
The report is compiled by analysts who reach their conclusions after gathering
information from professional contacts, the findings of other human rights and free
press organisations, specialists in geographic and geopolitical areas, government
and multilateral reports, and domestic and international news media.
"In every region of the world last year, we found both governments and private actors
attacking reporters, blocking their physical access to newsworthy events, censoring
content and ordering politically motivated firings of journalists."
Press freedom in the Netherlands
Along with Norway and Sweden, the Netherlands was rated as having the world’s
freest press, up from second place last year. This comes from having strong legal
protections for the press and all citizens being able access to diverse content in all
media forms, with governments that respect media freedom and editorial
independence.
Also, last year Dutch newspapers launched a website called Publeaksthat allows
whistle- blowers to securely and anonymously leak information to the press, to help
denounce abuses and stimulate investigative journalism. The one area of difficulty
the report identified their struggles with regulating hate speech without imposing
burdensome legal restrictions.
On the other hand, Italy’s score improved slightly, as self-censorship and the
influence of advertising revenue on content decreased after Silvio Berlusconi
stepped down as premier in late 2011.
Index details by Reporters Without Borders (rsf.org)
Anti-coup protesters prepare for a clash with riot police on March 02, 2021 in
Yangon, Myanmar. Myanmar's military government has intensified a crackdown on
protesters in recent days, using tear gas and live ammunition, charging at and
arresting protesters and journalists.
This year’s World Press Freedom Day highlights the importance of information as a
public good, a theme of huge importance as the Covid-19 pandemic still grips the
world and fake news and disinformation continue to harm health, human rights and
democracy alike.
And as Covid-19 ravages India, hit by the worst second wave of the virus, the
government focuses on censoring Twitter, compelling the removal of tweets from
professional reporters and citizens revealing the reality of the country’s health
disaster. In a world still consumed by the pandemic, journalists have themselves
been key workers – keeping populations informed, highlighting and combatting
orchestrated disinformation campaigns and helping to connect populations shut in
and fearful.
But as these examples from Myanmar, India and elsewhere show, the classic role of
the press remains as essential – and as under attack – as ever: to hold governments
to account, to shine a light on human rights violations, to give a platform to citizens in
need. In a rapidly evolving media and information landscape, the only certainty is of
change, and the disruption caused by the digital transformation is profound: on
finances, on quality and balance, on competition with other sources, from citizen
journalism to official propaganda. Partisanship in the press is high, trust in the media
low, and the future impact of unregulated and unregulatable social media platforms
is unknown.
Yet all of this only underlines the courage of individual journalists to report the news.
To have faith in the power of honest story-telling to make a difference. To represent
people’s interests, give them a voice and drive positive change.
Around the world, in fact, local voices are making themselves heard. For every act of
government repression, there is a resistance, and in this Spotlight we highlight many
inspirational successes of people finding ways to make themselves heard.
People like Abjata Khalif, who runs a not-for-profit organisation in northern Kenya
producing untold and under-reported stories in local languages for often extremely
marginalised communities. As part of an innovative “listening programme,” people in
remote villages gather together to listen to solar powered radio or a package on a
USB stick. “People are kept abreast of the news, they listen and learn to see how
they can replicate ideas from around the world into their own remote setting,” he
said.
Or like Saeb Daoud,director of the Voice of Peace radio in Iraq’s Nineveh province,
who is working to rebuild trust and unity among the area’s diverse religious and
ethnic communities. Given the fierce backlash against the media’s attempts to hold
government and officials to account, he said, “I’m not sure what the future will look
like for freedom of the press.”