Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Part I
June 2019
© June 6, 2019: J Jericho & The Free School www.thefreeschool.education Price: ₭ 0
Author Jay
This educational book is not for commercial sale. It strives to inform diligent researchers and
scholars of developments that relate to NESARA and GESARA. Images in this book acknowledge
sources. Royalty free use is claimed under the fair illustration purposes in education. The cover
page image is an extract of the 88-page document annexed in this document’s prime appendix.
This public exposure draft was penned without assistance. I am grateful to receive feedback
about errors and ideas from any source. You may e-mail the author at jay@journalistethics.com
This book has no sponsors, contributor or editors. All opinions are those of the author.
You may download a free copy of this book in PDF or print format at these home pages:
Part 2 Methods p. 9
Fables p. 15
Part 3 Planets p. 18
Part 4 Pharaohs p. 19
Part 5 Plunderers p. 20
Part 6 Petrodollars p. 22
Part 7 Parables p. 24
Facts p. 27
Part 9 Documentations p. 37
Part 11 Discussions p. 46
Part 12 Disinformation p. 52
Part 13 Deeds p. 56
Fakery p. 68
Feasibility p. 70
Finalization p. 74
Part 5 Usury p. 21
Facts p. 27
Figures
Appendices
This book is about a theory that a NESARA Bill was presented to America’s Congress in prior
decades. As discussed in Chapter 12, it is not clear if the acronym NESARA stands for the National
Economic Stabilization and Recovery Act or the National Economic Security and Recovery Act.
This book’s first objective, Parts 3 to 7, provides brief context to what I term ‘NESARA Fables’. I
next investigate a set of concrete facts that relate to NESARA in Parts 8 to 13. The final discussion
section explores arguments that NESARA is a hoax and/or a scam. I conclude this book by briefly
exploring the feasibility of introducing a NESARA financial reset in America in the current political
climate. I extend this discussion to consider GESARA – the global version of NESARA.
The inspiration behind this book centers around electioneering statements made by American
President Donald Trump during 2016. I contextualize this political rhetoric to information about
NESARA that exists in the public domain pre 2016. A book titled Draining the Swamp, ostensibly
published by Dr. Harvey Francis Barnard in 1996 is credited by many respected public
commentators as the original source of the NESARA Bill. The authenticity of this bill is contested.
I engage with a vast body public material about NESARA from sources such as government
websites and mainstream media articles. This includes primary and secondary evidence.
I encourage critical inquirers to search for a range of original primary source documents and
secondary source materials beyond those discussed in this introductory book to draw their own
GESARA which are not listed in the references section of this book are available via databases
listed in the next section of this text. This open-access book is available online via Google Books.
This publication by Massieu (2012) is 638 pages long and is written in Spanish. This book is an
illustration example that may inform or remind researchers that some data sources may not be
accessible due to language issues. This lengthy book has not been translated into English.
I use critical-thinking research methodologies and triangulate multiple data sources and multiple
methods to draw inferences and validate findings. My analysis eliminates the influence of known
contaminated data such as false information, misleading statements, bias and errors.
Mention of these basic research methods principles above aims to guide critical-thinkers who
conduct their own research into NESARA and GESARA. Whether you agree with the research
methodologies and conclusions in this document are of secondary importance. The primary
objective of this book seeks to empower individuals and collectives to conduct free-willed,
rigorous research by critically evaluating multiple quality, relevant materials that relate to known
and suspected facts about essential information about NESARA and GESARA.
The table overleaf offers an introduction to sound research methodologies. It explains how
critical researchers can successfully use this information to evaluate the reliability of original
primary source data such as government policy documents and interviews with eyewitnesses
whose legitimacy is established. Original evidence is usually more accurate than secondary data.
An example of secondary data are documentaries (e.g. p. 10) and official government statements
such as the senate.gov illustration on the same page. Where possible, researchers should confirm
the existence and accuracy of all primary and secondary evidence cited by other sources.
This section lists databases that provide information about NESARA and GESARA that are useful
to support the objectives of this research. This inventory should aid others who aim to replicate
or extend my research. I list a sample of databases that provide no evidence. This inclusion aims
1. Academia www.academia.edu
2. Popular search engines e.g. Yahoo, Google, Bing e.g. www.bing.com
3. Research Gate www.researchgate.net
4. Public library databases e.g. www.nypl.org/collections/articles-databases
5. Deep archives e.g. https://web.archive.org/web/*/nesara
6. Document repositories e.g. www.scribd.com and www.slideshare.net
7. Independent documentaries e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDR2RjVP9DY
8. Social media e.g. https://www.facebook.com/enactNESARAnow/
9. United States Government archives e.g. https://senate.gov/
Data saturation was achieved after sampling 10 primary and 20 secondary data sources listed in
the references section of this document. The vast bulk of the evidence sourced is secondary.
Example: The CEO of the Shanghai Stock Exchange releases a forecast claiming
that she does not believe that the American Government will ever implement a
NESARA initiative. The CEO of the Shanghai Stock Exchange is a political
appointment that is accountable to Beijing – China’s national government. By
global standards, administrative heads of stock exchanges do not publicize such
predictions. She has no authority to speak about US Government policy.
2. Errors Data sources that are influenced by factual errors in content and opinions should
be ignored or analyzed with extreme caution.
(accidental)
Example: The errata section on a consulting report published by Price
Waterhouse Coopers’ Public Sector Division states that “this report contains a
small number research errors about the feasibility of the NESARA initiative”.
3. Falsities Data sources that are influenced by incorrect/fake content and opinions should
be ignored or analyzed with extreme caution.
(deliberate)
A public speaker issues a notice declaring that some claims made at global
conferences about NESARA were fake and aimed to maximize publicity.
Critical-thinkers should consider the net benefits gained from ignoring all
material originating from that speaker. It is difficult to know if any statements
they made were true or false if that person admits to multiple deceptions.
4. Misleading Data sources that are influenced by misleading content should be ignored or
analyzed with extreme caution.
Example: A Treasury official states that there are no plans to implement NESARA
in the short term. This statement is misleading if ‘short term’ is not defined. The
phrase ‘no plans’ does not mean that a course-of-action will not be
implemented, if for example, the government changed its mind tomorrow.