Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In my opinion, the differing fundamental relationship between the two NGOs and
the Haitian governments boils down to leadership. Strong leaders who initially stay true
to their values when dealing with donors have fewer regrets about what they become
later down the road. When the NGOs give an inch, the donors take a mile. While NGOs
and their leaders have good intentions in seeking or making deals with donors, they fail
to see the possible consequences. These consequences can lead NGOs to make
choices they may have otherwise not have made. The choices may not always be
through a written contract. The pressure to bend to the donors can also come from the
The Sove Lavi had less participation from their team than the Fanm Tet Ansanm
from the very beginning negotiations with donors. Not to say that Mme Versailles's
choices were wrong and Mme Dominique's choices were right, but I believe the
inclusion of staff in meetings is a great way to keep even leaders honest. Discussions
being out in the open so that staff can listen in and give their opinion is essential,
especially when the staff is a part of the community who have skin in the game.
Conversations were often held in the open, as were most aspects of work at Fanm Tet
Module 5 1
Ansanm. (Schuller, p.128) I believe this was powerful for the NGO to realign with its
values and goals and see that there could be other options. The more diversity involved
in the discussion, the better. Perhaps if Mme Versailles and Sove Lavi took this
approach within the NGO, it would have come naturally in the decision-making process.
Instead, out of what felt like a necessity, plans were pushed aside to be considered
later. They agreed because they felt they needed the donors and immediately. There
were many contradictions, but through the unprofessionalism of the meeting, it just went
I believe that Fanm Tet Ansanm was able to balance their internal management
with the management of relationships in the broader environment within which the
NGOs operate because they stayed true to their values and didn't fall victim to the
pressure of striking a deal for funding. I find this quite honorable as with many
organizations in the United States; an organization rarely refuses funding from a donor.
America and many other places and how flexible their stances are when they get
significant funding. They most likely run from a good place with good values but are
forced to stand behind promises made to donors. Sove Lavi's balance with their internal
management and the management with the broader environment quickly disintegrated
as they described the relationship internally as a form of slavery, making way for the
help.
Resources
Module 5 1
Schuller, M. (2012). Killing with Kindness: Haiti, International Aid, and Ngos.