You are on page 1of 37

STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM

STUDENTS

CHAPTER I

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction

Many learning habits were developed over time as students gets more and more

accustomed to school. Likewise, students have disregarded other habits due to the

limitation of their capacity. Students also adjusted their study habits according to the

changes happening in the environment. One of the study habits included is their

preference on what time they study.

People can be classified as a morning person or a night person. A morning person

is more productive when doing work during the day while a night person is more

productive during at night. For some students, focusing on schoolwork is easier during

the morning hours of the day, while others may find that studying at night works better

for them (Oxford Learning, 2017). Different students may learn better at different times

of the day due to their unique learning styles.

Around the world, researches about study time of students refer to the length or

the duration of their study period. Specifically, studies are more focused on the number of

hours a student a lot when they study and its relation and effect to academic performance.

One study, according to Ukpong and George (2012), stated that academic performance of

those with long study time behavior was significantly different from that of students with

short study time behavior. The difference of this research, however, is that the study will

only focus on the relation and not in its effect.

Unlike those in the western part of the globe, Asian learners spend more time

studying. Chinese students allotted more time for studying. They have twice the time

1
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

spent on learning compared to regular western learner. According toHelmke and Tuyet

(2006),the results of their study showed that the two group of respondents, Western;

German and South East-Asian: Chinese students, have a difference on the amount of

study time spent by the students.

Filipino students have different learning styles. One of these learning styles is

about the time they chose to study. As stated by James (1995) in his article entitled

“Learning Styles in the Philippines,” Filipino students appear to learn best in the early

morning since they are most alert, most easily attentive and best behaved at that time.

This could be said because Filipino students tend not to be persistent. Taking frequent

breaks while studying and preferring to work on several things simultaneously appears to

be the reason why they want to study in the morning.

According to an online based organization, K12 Philippines (2015), the K-12

program offers a decongested a 12 year program that gives students sufficient to master

skills and absorb basic competencies. With this said, mastering skills and absorbing basic

competencies require enough time. Furthermore, due to the curriculum, this will increase

the need to have a proper study time that fits to the students’ schedule and capacity.

People are now attached to social networking sites. According to Cortez (N.D) in

a research about Study Habits of College Students in Bulacan, due to the development of

web as a mean of communication, students have formed different study time. There are

factors that were considered before arriving at a certain study time. These factors are

essential because they affect how students choose their study time. However, there were

no study conducted in Bulacan about the connection of a student’s study time to

academic performance.

2
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

In this world, students have different study habits. One of which to consider is the

time they study. Student preferred study time may have or have not a relation to their

academic performance. Therefore, the researchers want to identify the relationship of

study time to academic performance.

This research aims to discuss the correlation of study time preference and

academic performance. Also, the objectives of this research is to provide the students

necessary information that may be helpful to them in choosing what time to study once

the relationship between study time and academic performance is known. The researchers

want to help students attain a higher academic performance that may affect their future by

giving them ideas using the results of this study as basis for preference.

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEMS

General Problem:

This study entitled “A Correlational Research about Study Time Preference and

Academic Performance of STEM Students of St. Dominic Academy of Pulilan, Inc.

school year 2018- 2019” aims to answer the question- How is study time preference

related to the students’ academic performance?

Specific Problem:

Specifically, the researchers will also answer the following questions:

1. What is the profile of the students in terms of:

1.1. Age

1.2. Grade level

1.3. Preferred time of studying

3
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

1.4. Final average grade on the previous school year

2. What is the most preferred time of STEM students to study?

3. What is the relationship of study time to academic performance?

4. What research implications could be derived from the results of this study?

Research Objectives

1. This research aims to study the relationship between study time preference

and academic performance.

2. This research aims to provide the students necessary information that may

be helpful to them in choosing what time to study once the relationship

between study time and academic performance is known.

3. This to help students attain a higher academic performance that may affect

their future by giving them ideas using the results of this study as basis for

preference.

Scope and Delimitation

This research will only focus on identifying the relationship of study time

preference to academic performance and will not discuss about the effect of the study

time preference to academic performance. The respondents of the study will be 150

Senior High School STEM Students of St. Dominic Academy of Pulilan Inc. The study

will only be conducted within the academic year 2018-2019 and within the school

campus only. The variable, Academic Performance, will be based on the final average

grade of the students’ on the previous school year. Also, external variables that are

4
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

related to the study will not be used by the researchers but will be understood and

acknowledged.

Significance of the Study

Administrators. The administrators may use this research to provide a more

organized schedule for the students to have a longer time to study.

Teachers. The teachers will be aware of the study time of the students and

therefore may manage the loading of school works to the students.

Parents. Parents will be familiarized with the usual time their children studies,

therefore will comprehend to their study time schedule.

Students. The students will be knowledgeable to the different effective study time

therefore may urge them to have their own study time in order to have a better

performance at school.

Researchers. The researchers will achieve their objectives and will be familiar to

the different study time of the students

Future Researchers. The future researchers may use this study as their reference

to improve their own research that is related to this study.

5
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

CHAPTER II

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

This chapter contains the different studies that are related and was used to come

up with the hypothesis. The parts of this chapter are Theoretical Studies, Review of

Related Literature and Studies, Conceptual Framework, Hypothesis and Definition of

Terms. In this chapter, the variables of the study will be classified as independent and

dependent variable.

THEORETICAL STUDIES

Palm Beach Study Time Theory

The Palm Beach Study Time Theory of Professor Palm Beach (1864) states that

study time has a role in the learning outcomes of the students. Study time has the ability

to control and predict the learning performances of an individual. Although this theory is

in regard to the length of study time, the idea that study time provides basis on the impact

to academic performance is essential to the study. This could mean that there is a

significant relationship between study time preference and academic performance.

The theory further states that there is a difference in the study times of the

students in the past and present. Thus, by identifying the relationship of the study time

preference to academic performance, a more concrete idea will improve the Palm Beach

Study Time Theory.

Pickle Jar Theory

Another theory that is related to the research is the Pickle Jar Theory. The theory

is proposed by Jeremy Wright in 2002 wherein Wright stated that time management is

similar to a pickle jar. Time management is related to study time preference. In order to

6
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

conduct time management, a student must have a time of preference to study. Wright

have tested different theories regarding time management but none worked until finding

out about the pickle jar theory.

The pickle jar theory is consist of the jar as the container, large rocks as top

priorities and small pebbles as less priorities. In order to fit everything in the jar, one

must pickle everything inside and this includes balancing everything and organizing

them. The research can use this theory because of the concept of balancing. To determine

the relationship of the study time preference to the academic performance, the use of

balance is partially helpful.

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

What is Study Time Preference?

Study time preference is the desired time of a person to study that deals with his/

her personal interests at a certain time of the day. The time might be either at day time or

night time based on the students’ preference depending on how students learn better.

According to Oxford Learning (1984) stated that people have the most productive time of

the day when a person have the most energy. Some people are classified as morning

people with a lot of energy while others have more energy in the evening hours.

Day Time Studying Preference

Since the research is tackling about study time preference, the researchers used

the term day and night to classify the preference. Day time studying is the early and

middle part of the day; Morning and afternoon, latter part of the day; evening and night.

7
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

Some says morning time is the best time of effective studying because it is the

time that the brain is ready for new information, refreshed and energized. Energized mind

makes it easier to focus on what is being learned, and absorb the information more

effectively (Oxford Learning, 1984). Energized mind functions well because the brain

had enough time to rest and is ready to take in new information needed to attain academic

proficiency.

Early morning is a time when there is very less movement of any form (Quora,

2017). Less movement during day time will help brain to effectively absorb information

in effective studying. This is related to the research because it help in identifying the time

preference whether day or night. Also, it will provide more information to the people and

to the researchers.

Most people are contactable during the day so it’s easier to communicate with a

friend or teacher during day time if you have any questionsQuora, (2017). The statement

stands that if there is help necessary, day time is the better time to study because of the

availability of the people a student can ask to other people. There are many sources of

other answers that can be taken not within the self alone. Communication with others

when the task is difficult to handle alone is essential. The idea will help you add more

information and this added information will be helpful in performing a better academic

performance.

The memory is the one responsible to equip and store the information to be used

later on. And according to science, there is a time that is best suited for it to acquire new

information. According to Dr. Jane Oakhill (2018), if preparing for reading heavy task

such as History, afternoon is the best time of day to study. This states that not just by

8
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

studying in the morning is effective for better academic performance but also the

afternoon time of the day can be useful for a student to learn specially for studying

literature and history.

“Filipino students appear to learn best in the early morning since they are most

alert, most easily attentive and best behaved at that time” (James, 1995). This could be

said because Filipino are most unlikely to be persistent. There are many other things that

a Filipino does instead of focusing solely on one thing. Since early morning gives more

concentration because the atmosphere and other premise such as being alone, make its

more comfortable for Filipinos to study early in the morning.

Night Time Studying

As Oxford Learning (1984) stated, difference makes a student learn during

different times of the day. While for some, night time is an effective time for studying

because the surrounding is peaceful and quiet. It says that peaceful surrounding improves

concentration and recall. Clearer mind and creative thinking functions more in night time

and sleeping after studying can consolidate information and also improve recall.

In a purely physiological outlook, the body is better equipped to study later at

night than in the morning.  Blood sugar is at its lowest in the morning, which means that

students have less of an ability to concentrate. Not only that, but for most students, or at

least those who are night owls, their peak melatonin levels are around 5:30 a.m. This

increased level of melatonin, according to the National Sleep Foundation, will cause

sleepiness, so at that time, anyone trying to study in the morning will have trouble

focus on the material or will simply fall back asleep. Studying at night may also be more

beneficial because night-studying will result in more retained information than studying

9
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

in the morning by The Oracle (2012). The statement based upon the body’s blood sugar

level that supports the answer that night time is the better time to study in order to have a

good academic performance.

Some people find it easy to learn and remember things in the morning, while

others do it better as the day advances and many function best when the stars are out and

the whole world has gone to sleep. If you are a morning person, you will do better in the

morning and the early hours of the school. But if you are a night person, you will find

studying before going to bed or after everyone else is asleep, more effective. But night

people should remember that effective studying and good memory retention is also

related to the amount of sleep you get. So if you need to stay up late in the night to study,

then make sure to take a nap in the afternoon, or if in the morning, then sleep in time to

get at least seven to eight hours of sleep in the night to wake up bright early the next

morning. (Dawn, ND). The statement simply said that the time preference of a student

depends on that person, personally. People were classified as morning people and night

owls. Morning people find it easier to learn during day time while night owls prefer to

study at night.

Many researches were conducted but few have tacked about the specific time

study preference of the students. This pushed the researchers to further discover about the

relationship of the two variables of the study. Hence, the study took used other types of

research to determine if there is a possible or no possible relationship.

There is No Relationship Between Study Time and Academic Performance.

Other type of research such as a causal comparative research may be a basis in

determining the relationship. If one variable affects the other, the probability of having a

10
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

relationship is high. Thus, the researchers used the following to prove, support, or negate

their hypothesis.

According to a study conducted by Michael Murphy et al. (2013), students’

allocated preferences is not related to their grades. The study recommended that students

who are brighter tend to create a more revised version of modules rather than those of

low performing students. The relationship of the two variables are relatively small to

even be considered. There is no convincing evidence of the improvement or not of the

academic performance.

In the study of Non and Templaar (2016), they have used impatience as an

indicator of time preference. If a students is impatient, the time preferences differs and

thus, matters. Moreover, conclusion states that there is no significant relationship

between preference and study effort for academic performance. The researches can use

this study because of the similarity in the variables used and to generate idea of time

preference.

There is a Relationship Between Study Time and Academic Performance

According to Foen Ng (2016), “Educational planners, school administrators,

teachers and parent teacher associations should be encouraged to promulgate the findings

of studies dealing with the impact of time use on academic success to parents and

adolescents.” If there is a need to support the research on time use, thus time preferences

has a significant relationship to academic performance. Since Ng said that if the students

are aware of the relationship, there is a high chance of getting a higher academic

performance and everything that goes under it.

11
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

Another study by David Kember et al. (1995) said that there is an effect of study

time to academic performance. The result is based on an experiment made by the

researcher to a class of mechanical engineering students. Since study time in this study is

used determined as the length of the time studies, therefore proves that one chooses a

time to study first. Making a relation to time study preference. The idea of this research

will be used by the researchers as a reference to the hypothesis.

According to Pope (2016), after analyzing middle school students based on their

performances in the Math and English examination in the morning, there have been a

significant relation to when the students prefer to study. Cognitively, taking the exam in

the morning resulted to a lower score. The hypothesis of Pope was contradicted by the

result that was taken from his experiment. The performance of the students were best

during the afternoon. Even though the hypothesis was contradicted, there is a relationship

present. Having said that when a variable affects the other, there is a relationship either

positively or negatively.

Conceptual Framework

Independent Variable Dependent Variable

Study Time Academic


Preference of STEM Performance of
students STEM students

Figure 1: Relationship between Study Time Preference and Academic Performance

12
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

Figure 1 shows the relationship between the two variables’ study time preference

and academic performance. The independent variable of the research is study time

preference and the dependent variable is the academic performance. Since study time

preference depends on the respondents, the researchers cannot control the variable.

However, the academic performance of the students is dependent on the study time

preference.

In relation to the conceptual framework, the researchers formulated a hypothesis

that there is a relationship between study time preference and academic performance.

Hypotheses

The following are the null and alternative hypotheses of the researchers:

H1: (Alternative) The study time preferences of the students have a relationship to

their academic performance.

H0: (Null) The study time preference of the students does not have a relationship

to their academic performance.

The research used the alternative hypothesis regarding the variables of the study.

The researchers agreed that study time preference has a relationship to academic

performance.

Definition of Terms

The following are the terms used according to the purpose in the study:

Communication. A process by which information is exchanged between

individuals through a common system.

13
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

Cognitively. Based on or capable of being reduced to empirical factual

knowledge

Contradict. To imply the opposite or denial of something

Correlation. The degree to which two or more attributes or measurements on the

same group of elements show a tendency to vary together

Preference. To set or hold before or above other

Variables. Represents a measurable attribute that changes or varies across the

experiment whether comparing results between multiple groups, multiple people or even

when using a single person in an experiment conducted over time. 

Disseminate. To scatter or spread widely

STEM. Science Technology Engineering Mathematics. is an educational

program developed to prepare primary and secondary students for college and graduate

study in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

Elaborate. Worked out with great care and nicety of detail; executed with great

minuteness

Tallied. A number or group of items recorded

Consolidate. To bring together (separate parts) into a single or unified whole;

unite; combine

Decongest. To diminish or end the congestion of.

14
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

CHAPTER III

METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY

This chapter contains the elaboration of the research methodology used and

research design of this study. This chapter involves the method and techniques,

respondents of the study, instrument of the study, data gathering procedure, and lastly,

the data processing and statistical treatment of the gathered data utilized in this research

Methods and Techniques Used

In this study, the researchers will make use of a non-experimental research

utilizing a correlational approach in a form of a survey method. As cited by Chiang et al.

(Copyright 2018) in their article “Overview of Non-Experimental Research”, the

researchers lack control or manipulation to the independent variable of the study. Since

the research uses a correlational approach, the researchers will only be identifying the

relationship between the two quantifiable variables. Correlational research focuses on the

statistical relationships of the variables without manipulation (Chiang et al., copyright

2018).

The data will be gathered with the use of correlational survey method in which the

researchers will choose a group of people as their sample who will take the survey. The

researchers used a survey method rather than naturalistic observation in order to gather

primary data. Primary data gathered are direct data coming from the participants of the

study. Survey method is best used in collecting data as reported by individuals. Surveys

can be administered through online, paper, or telephone interviews (DeLecce, 2003).

15
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

Respondents of the Study

Keeping in line with this study's research design, this study will utilize the Grade

11 and 12 STEM students in the school year 2018-2019 of St. Dominic Academy of

Pulilan Inc. Poblacion, Pulilan, Bulacan who uses different time of study. The total

population of the study is 195 students with the sample of 131 respondents according to

the slovin’s formula.

Instrument of the Study

The researchers are going to use the Questionnaire Method to measure the key

variables of the study. The questionnaire that will be used by the researchers are validated

by the experts. It was composed of one set of test. The test is composed of statements and

the respondents are asked to check the given options appropriate to their choice in each

number to get the student’s reactions and responses to the study time preference and

academic performance.

The questionnaire is composed of twenty-one (21) questions in measuring the

Study time preference where the respondents are expected to rate through rating scale

including strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree. In measuring the

Academic Performance, the students will indicate their final average grade in their

demographics located on the top of the questions. The researchers develop close-ended

items of statements that are grounded from the specific objectives of the study.

Before asking the respondents, a section will be presented for the respondents’

demographics wherein the respondents need to provide important information such as

their age, gender, grade level, preferred time of studying and their final average grade in

16
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

previous year. The researchers used this questionnaire for them to identify the answers of

the respondents as they tally all the data from the survey that they will conduct.

Validation of the Instrument

Related research papers’ data gathering method was used as a reference in

choosing the right instruments for the study. After the first validation from the research

adviser, the eight numbered close ended questionnaire underwent through revisions of

text and addition of thirteen more questions with a total of twenty-one closed ended

questions still having the same scale; strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly

disagree, relevant to the study with to further interpret the data that will be gathered.

Data Gathering Procedure

As the researcher’s survey questionnaires are validated by the experts, the

researchers asked permission to the director principal and administrators of St. Dominic

Academy of Pulilan Inc. to conduct the survey. The survey questionnaires made were

disseminated to 150 STEM Senior High School students of St. Dominic Academy of

Pulilan Inc. in the school year 2018-2019.

Furthermore, the name of the respondents asked by the researchers were optional.

The information shared are assured to be confidential between the researchers and

respondents only. Respondents were free to accept or decline to answer the survey

questionnaires but the researchers asked for their cooperative participation to answer the

research questionnaires accurately.

17
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

Answering the survey questions took about five (5) to ten (10) minutes for each

respondents. There were no incentives offered for participating in this research. The

researchers will handout the survey questionnaires all at once and will give the

respondents enough time to answer the questionnaire before collecting it all together.

Data Processing and Statistical Treatment

In data processing, the information collected will be tallied and tabulated. The

researchers will use the Average Weighted Mean (X) and Pearson (r) to determine the

significant relationship of the variable, study time preference of the students to their

academic performance that is perceived by their final average grade from the first

semester. Furthermore, the Likert Scale will be used for the questionnaire.

The researchers also used the Slovin’s formula to determine the total number of

respondents needed.

Average Weighted Mean

In determining the assessment of the respondents with regards to their personal

profiles. Also this formula was also used in order to support the results of the study by

computing for the mean of the likert scale in the different subtopics of the questionnaire.

The formula of the average weighted mean will be used as follows:

Fx
Formula: X =
N

Where: X= weighted mean

F= Frequency

x= weight of each item

N= number of cases

18
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

Pearson

Pearson (r) is used in measuring the linear correlation between two variables X

and Y. The value taken can be between +1 and -1. The total positive linear correlations is

perceived as 1, no linear correlation is 0, and total negative linear correlation is -1. The

Pearson (r) has the formula below:

r = n¿¿

Where: r= Pearson

n= Number of respondents

x= First variable

y= Second variable

∑ x = Summation of first variable


∑ y= Summation of second variable
∑ xy = Summation of x as multiplied to y

Likert Scale

In order to utilize the questionnaire, the researchers will use the Likert Scale with

the following categories and corresponding values:

5- Strongly Agree (SA)

4- Agree (A)

3- Neutral (N)

2- Disagree (D)

1- Strongly Disagree (SD)

19
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

Slovin’s Formula
This formula was used to identify the number of samples or the total number of

respondents for the study. The used margin of error is 0.05%.

N
1+ N ¿ ¿

Where:

e is the margin of error, and

N is the total population size

20
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

CHAPTER IV

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter describes the analysis of data followed by a discussion of the

research findings. The findings are being related to the hypothesis and research questions

that guided the study. Data were analyzed to identify, describe and explore the

relationship between students’ study time preference and their academic performance. In

this study, the researchers’ alternative hypothesis is that students’ study time preference

has a relationship with academic performance. A total of 150 respondents answered the

distributed questionnaire.

Results and Discussion

Demographic Variables

Although this question was not part of the purpose of the study, the set of data

regarding age and grade level was intended to gather demographic variables from the

respondents. Moreover, the set of data from preferred time of studying and final averaged

grade was intended to be used in identifying the relationship of study time preference and

academic performance.

Table 1. Age of the Respondents and its Frequency and Percentage

AGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

15 2 1.54%

16 34 25.95%

17 65 49.62%

21
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

18 28 21.37%

19 1 0.76%

20 1 0.76%

TOTAL 131 100%

Table 1 shows that according to the data, the age bracket of the respondents range

between 15-20 years old. However, majority of the respondents are 17 years old with a

total percentage of 49.62% followed by the 25.95% of the respondents who are 16 years

old.

Table 2. The General Weighted Average of the Respondents and its Frequency and

Percentage

General Weighted Average Frequency Percentage


82 1 0.76%
83 1 0.76%
84 2 1.53%
85 13 9.92%
86 8 6.11%
87 12 9.16%
88 23 17.56%
89 19 14.50%
90 18 13.74%
91 15 11.45%
92 13 9.92%

22
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

93 5 3.82%
95 1 0.76%
TOTAL 131 100%

Table 2 shows that the general weighted average of the respondents are ranged

from 82-95 with most of the students (N=23) having a grade of 88 during the first

semester. This is equivalent to a percentage of 17.56. The highest grade was followed by

the grade of 89 with a frequency of 19 and a percentage of 14.50. All of the grades

obtained are above the required passing grade for the semester.

Table 3. The Grade Level of the Respondents and its Frequency and Percentage

Grade Level Frequency Percent


11 66 50.38%
12 65 49.62%
Total 131 100%

The respondents of the study are senior high students of the STEM strand that are

grades 11 and 12. According to the data in table number 3, there are more grade 11

students with a 50.38% than grade 12 students with a 49.62%.

Analysis and Interpretations

In order to understand the results of the study based on the collected data, the

researchers have arranged the results in the same manner the questions in the statement of

the problem are ordered.

23
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

STEM Students have different preferred study time as shown in the table below

(Table 1), the given set of data for preferred time of study- evening (4), late night (3),

midnight (2), and early morning(1), are presented together with their frequency and

equivalent percentage.

Table 4. Study Time Preference and its Frequency and Percentage

Study Time
Study Time
Preference Frequency Percentage
Preference
(coded)

Evening 4 41 31.30%

Late Night 3 37 28.24%

Midnight 2 30 22.90%

Early Morning 1 23 17.56%

Total 131 100%

In this table, the study time preference are coded as numerical digits from 1-4.

The table interprets that majority of the respondents- 31.30% or 41 students from the total

number of respondents, prefer to study at evening or 6:00pm-8:00pm. More so, 28.24%

or 37 students from the total number of respondents chose to study late night or 9:00pm-

11:00 pm. 22.90% or 30 students out of the total number of respondents prefer to study at

midnight or 12:00am-3:00am. Lastly, the least number of students study at early morning

or 4:00am-5:00am compromise the 17.56% or 23 students out of the total number of

respondents.

24
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

To further understand the relationship of the variables of the study, the table

below (Figure 2), shows the final average grade of the respondents and corresponding

study time preference as answered by the respondents.

5
Study Time PReference

0
80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96

Academic Performance

Figure 2: Study Time Preference and Academic Performance Scatter Diagram

In this figure, the academic performance and the study time preference are plotted

against the x and y axis respectively using the scatter diagram chart. The chart shows a

low positive correlation to no correlation between the variables of the study. This can be

also be seen using the Pearson formula.

Pearson-Correlated Value Interpretation

0.00932101 Weak Positive Correlation


Table 5. Pearson Value and its Interpretation

As shown in table 5, the obtained person value is a weak positive correlation. This

shows that there is a relationship between the variables however the degree is weak.

25
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

Table 6. Mean of the Sum of Question per Subtopics and its Interpretation

Number Of Number Of
Mean
Questions Answers Below Answers Above Total
Obtained
The Mean The Mean

1-7 24.00667 73 58 131


8-11 12.16667 64 67 131
12-15 12.91333 61 70 131
16-18 9.09333 70 61 131
19-21 9.48667 55 76 131

In the given table, the researchers computed for the mean in order to interpret the

correlation obtained in the Pearson Formula and Scatter Diagram. The questionnaire was

divided into five subtopics with a minimum of 3 statements each. Statements number 1-7

is regarding about study time preference in general.

The following are the statements included in the topic, Study Time Preference.

1. Having a study time is important

2. Having a consistent study time preference results in a better academic

performance.

3. My academic performance is independent from my study time preference.

4. Study time preference is not related to my academic performance.

5. Study Time preference has a high relativity to Academic Performance.

6. There’s no need for consistent study time preference.

7. Studying at Evening, Late Night, Midnight, or Early morning is different

from one another.

26
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

The mean obtained was 24.00667. To interpret this data, the researchers counted

the answers of the respondents that are below and above the mean. Moreover, 73

response in the first topic out of the 131 responses fell below the mean while 58

responses totaled above average out of the 131 responses. More than half of the responses

fell below the mean.

The second subtopic contains the questions regarding “Studying at Evening”. The

mean obtained was 12.16667.

The following are the statements included in the topic, Studying at Evening.

1. I study right after I finish school.

2. I can do more studying when I start between 6:00pm-8:00pm

3. Studying at evening has a relation with my academic performance.

4. Studying at evening is better than other time preference.

More than half of the respondents (N=64) is above the mean and the rest falls

below the mean (N=67).

The third subtopic is about studying at late evening wherein the mean obtained is

12.91333. Majority of the response (N=70) are above the average mean obtained.

The following are the statements included in the topic, Studying at Late Evening:

1. I study after I do some other non-related to school works.

2. I usually start to study on or between 9:00pm-11:00pm.

3. Studying late at night has a relation with my academic performance.

4. I do not study right away after my class.

The fourth subtopic about studying at midnight obtained a mean of 9.09333 where

majority of the responses fell below the mean (N=70)

27
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

The following are the statements included in the topic, Studying at Midnight:

1. My brain is more active when I study at midnight

2. I am more functional and can absorb information between 12:00pm-

3:00am

3. Studying at midnight has a relation with my academic performance.

The fifth subtopic obtained a mean of 9.48667 where majority of the response fell

above the mean (N=76).

The following are the statements included in the topic, Studying at Early

Morning.

1. Rest is the reason why I only study in the early morning.

2. My mind is more refresh during 4:00am-5:00am.

3. Studying at early morning has a relation with my academic

performance.

This gathered data shows that most of the respondents are above the mean that

can be translated to a positive correlation, however, due to the responses that fell below

the mean, the data gathered is weak.

Moreover, to further support the results gathered, the table below shows the

average weighted mean taken from each questions from the sample of the study.

Table 7. The Mean of the Likert Scale and its Interpretation

Question Summation ¿ Mean ( x ) Interpretation


1 539 4.114504 A
2 489 3.732824 N
3 431 3.290076 N
4 371 2.832061 N
5 457 3.48855 N

28
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

6 356 2.717557 D
7 486 3.709924 N
8 327 2.496183 D
9 403 3.076336 N
10 423 3.229008 N
11 422 3.221374 N
12 417 3.183206 N
13 378 2.885496 N
14 411 3.137405 N
15 466 3.557252 N
16 412 3.145038 N
17 384 2.931298 N
18 399 3.045802 N
19 415 3.167939 N
20 437 3.335878 N
21 430 3.282443 N

The table above shows the summation of the Likert Scale as answered by the

respondents in the questionnaire. The interpretation is identified as SA for Strongly

Agree, A for Agree, N for Neutral, D for Disagree, and SD for Strongly Disagree as

dependent on the given scale for each degree. Majority of the statements in the Liker

Scale is interpreted as neutral and with only two statements as disagree. Meanwhile, only

one of the statements in the questionnaire obtained an agree interpretation. This result

support that the obtained Pearson value is a weak positive correlation since most of the

statements are interpreted as neutral.

29
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

CHAPTER V

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter includes the Conclusions and Recommendations of this research.

This chapter will show the conclusions derived from the data gathered which will answer

the stated problems of this research and will also give the recommendations for those

who wish to pursue similar studies about the study time preference of students and their

academic performance.

Summary of Findings

From the analysis of the data in the previous chapter, the following are the

findings and are summarized as follows:

The major findings of the study is that the Pearson-correlated value obtained is

0.00932101 which is interpreted as a weak positive correlation and the Alternative

hypothesis of the research is accepted.

Since the major finding of the study is that there is a weak positive correlation

between the variables of the study which are study time preference and academic

performance. This can mean that as there is a change in the study time preference or as

the variable increase or decrease, there is a lower chance for the other variable which is

the academic performance to be related to the study time preference.

Conclusion

The following are the questions from our statement of the problem that the

researchers have found answers and conclusion.

30
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

1. What is the profile of the students in terms of:

1.1. Age

The gathered data about the respondents’ age ranges from 15-19 years old

1.2. Grade level

The year level of the chosen respondents is from 11th and 12th grade with similar

academic track which is STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics).

1.3. Preferred time of studying

The preferred time of studying, majority of the respondents (31.30%) answered

that their preferred time of studying is at evening or 6:00pm-8:00pm followed by the

second to the highest percentage (28.24%) gathered which studies during late night at

9:00pm-11:00 pm.

1.4. Final average grade on the previous school year

The final average grade for the first semester collected ranges from 82% to 95%

based on the participants’ answers.

2. What is the most preferred time of STEM students to study?

The results about the preferred time of STEM students to study are during

evening or 6:00pm-8:00pm. This research shows that 31.30% or 47 students among

the 131 respondents prefers to study at late night time while the rest of the 84 students

is divided into studying during early morning, midnight and late evening.

3. What is the relationship of study time to academic performance?

This research shows that there is a weak positive correlation between the study

time preferences to the academic performance of the respondents based on the

31
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

gathered information solved by the researchers. The Pearson calculated is valued at

0.00932101.

4. What research implications could be derived from the results of this study?

The research implication from this study is that study time preference of students

has little to no relationship to their academic performance since the interpreted

Pearson is a weak positive correlation. This could be implied that students may study

any time they prefer but their preference has a weak correlation to their academic

performance.

Objectives of the research

The researchers have met their research objectives. The study was able to identify

the relationship of the study time preference and academic performance. Furthermore, the

results of this study provided that the academic performance of the students are most

likely associated to their study time preference.

Hypothesis

The hypothesis of the study was accepted because the results showed a weak

positive correlation which mean that there is a relationship between study time preference

and academic performance.

Recommendations

Every research has holes or gaps that can still be fixed by further study or

researchers. Researchers of this study recommend to do the following to enhance the

research:

32
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

1. Widening of the sample population in order to maximize the number of

answers that will be gathered from the respondents. This will results to a

more generalized outcome since the scope of this study is limited to

STEM students only.

2. Future researchers might also add up questions to the questionnaire that

they will disseminate in order to get the time preference to study of the

respondents more specifically. It is important to improve the statements

that is being used in the questionnaire because an unclear statements may

cause confusion to the respondents.

3. Maximize the time given in order to have a good outcome that will satisfy

them, as they conduct their research, and satisfies the people that will see

the research and look for their output.

4. Future researchers are recommended to work hard and be persistent in

reading related studies that may help them to conduct their own research

and fill the gaps made by other researchers study.

5. Having a wide number of respondents requires a lot of encoding and

evaluations that will be time consuming. Patience and persistence is truly

needed in conducting this kind or research.

33
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Andrietti, V., & Velasco, C. (2015). Lecture Attendance, Study Time, and Academic

Performance:A Panel Data Study. Taylor& Francis Online. Retrieval date:

September 6, 2018

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00220485.2015.1040182

Devlin, T. (2017). Day or Night: When is the Best Time to Study?. Oxford Learning.

Retrieval date: September 05, 2018.

https://www.oxfordlearning.com/best-time-day-to-study/?

fbclid=IwAR1K3hSgmwIWC2KJrmJ1BcNtrIVv8YS5sNBGQ2Gef0iR2Rw-

TkQqMzpWsGs

Dolmans, D., & Wolfhagen, H. (1998). The Relation Between Time Spent on Individual

Study and Academic Achievement in a Problem-Based Curriculum. Springer.

Retrieval Date: August 30, 2018.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1009732511707

Fry, N. (2017). New Research Reveals that College Students Study Best Later in the Day.

Nevada Today. Retrieval date: September 05, 2018.

https://www.unr.edu/nevada-today/news/2017/best-time-of-day-to-study?

fbclid=IwAR3DY85wDKB_vg-

a_spJR4UuSPZ7IM9zaKeP42KAaBkYhzaPe649O3n08mk

Gortner, A., & Zulauf, V. (1999). Use of Time and Academic Performance of College

Students Does Studying Matter? Agecon. Retrieval Date: September 05, 2018.

34
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/21547/1/sp99zu01.pdf

James, D. (2018). When is the Best Time to Study? The Loop. Retrieval date: September

05, 2018.

https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/blog/2015/08/14/st-day-vs-night-when-is-the-

best-time-to-study-and-why/

Levesque, R. (2017). Memory Improvement – Why Is Your Memory Better in the

Morning? Rocket Memory. Retrieval date: September 05, 2018.

http://www.rocketmemory.com/articles/memory-improvement/?

fbclid=IwAR3p4GROwo68JRLoRxqR9LCkzSOJxPgwW3QaiqLVUQ6pPHn3Su

niVU8VY8o

Mukesh, S. (2017). What would the best time for studying? Quora. Retrieval date:

September 5, 2018

https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-best-timing-for-study

Nony, A., & Tempelaarz, D.(2016), Time Preferences, Study Effort, and Academic

Performance. Creative Commons Attribution. Retrieval date: September 05, 2018.

https://cris.maastrichtuniversity.nl/portal/files/12524535/3848562.pdf

Oakhill, J. (2018). Morning Memory vs. Afternoon Memory. Rocket Memory. Retrieval

date: September 5, 2018

http://www.rocketmemory.com/articles/memory-improvement/

Qureshi, K. (2017). What is the Best Time to Study? Dawn. Retrieval date: August 22,

2018.

https://www.google.com.ph/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https%3A%2F-

%2Fwww.dawn.com%2Fnews%2Famp%2F1308334&v-

35
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

ed=2ahUKEwiauvb7soDdAhWJro8KHa06AdIQFjAl-

egQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw2jAiP0ee7j4HG6qe0WOmMB&ampcf=1

Ukpong, D., & George I. (2013). Length of Study-Time Behavior and Academic

Achievement of SocialStudies Education Students in the University of Uyo.

International Education Studies. Retrieval date: September 05, 2018.

https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067747.pdf?

fbclid=IwAR2hEc5d4DEHwT90I3tWWmihwn1NTSdIoEHNULbRGUBbW1xvB9

iiNwHtY0

Wright, J. (2002). Time Management: The Pickle Jar Theory. Project Management.

Retrieval date: September 05, 2018.

https://alistapart.com/article/pickle

Zhang, L. (2012). Studying at Night Provides More Benefits. The Oracle. Retrieval date:

September 05, 2018.

https://gunnoracle.com/1950/forum/studying-at-night-provides-more-benefits/?

fbclid=IwAR24oz9PHUiSaiGfFOazntrnLP6u5kJ56ssiSXXXm6K1DJttw5aUnY

Y_qO4

Zulauf, C., & Gortner, A. (1999). Use of Time and Academic Performance of College

Students: Does Studying Matter. American Agricultural Economics Association.

Studies. Retrieval date: September 05, 2018.

https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/21547/1/sp99zu01.pdf?

fbclid=IwAR2hEc5d-

4DEHwT90I3tWWmihwn1NTSdIoEHNULbRGUBbW1xvB9iiNwHtY0

36
STUDY TIME PREFERENCE TO ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STEM
STUDENTS

37

You might also like