Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
and Cambridge University Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Journal of Southeast Asian History
67
way the student will be able to understand more clearly the charac
teristics of Indonesian Nationalism so that a classification can be
made of the trends prevalent within this movement. An identifi
cation of Indonesian Nationalism will also provide an explanation
of the meaning of nationalism in general.
It appeared that, with regard to terminology, there exists no un
animity among scholars when denominating the historical pheno
menon of the genesis of nationalism. Blumberger and Pluvier use
the term "Nationalist Movement", while Kahin calls it the "Natio
nalistic Movement". In addition there are also names such as
"National Awakening" (Vandenbosch) or "National Reveille"
(A. von Arx).
The use of the term "National Movement" is found in the works
of Ramsay Muir (1917), of F. Hertz (1951), and in the report of
the Royal Institute of International Affairs. (1939) The latter says
that the word "National is used as the adjective form of nation in
both senses and in the political sense has a further significance that
it refers to the whole body of citizens. .." With respect to the
word "nation" the report says that the term is ". . .to denote an
aggregation of individuals united by other, as well as political ties ?
ties, commonly of race, religion, language, or tradition." (ibid, p.
xvii).
The fact that the word "national" is used in this paper as an
adjective of movement does not refer to ties as said in the citation,
but it is only used with the purpose to comprise the totality of acti
vities pertaining to the movement in all fields of life with the un
animous objective to fight against the colonial power. Further
more, the term National Movement refers to the whole process of
genesis and growth of Indonesian Nationalism in its manifestations
as nationalistic organizations based on the consciousness, common
sentiment and desires to fight for the freedom of the people within
the frame of a unitary state. The terminological enigma, how
ever, still exists in the study of nationalism and no solution can be
found which will be completely satisfactory.
The use of these terms should be put back into the context of
its historical milieu, thus enabling us to discover its real connota
tion or the user's bias when encountering or experiencing the
process as is indicated by the terms.
At the outset Dutch authors used the term "Jong Java Beweging"
(Young Java Movement), (Het Tijdschrift, 1911-12, p. 95); later
the term "Inlandsche Beweging" ?- Native Movement (De Gids,
1914, p. 23) was generally accepted in order to include all move
ments of other Indonesian groups. The term "Indische Beweging"
(Koloniaal Tijdschrift 1913, II, p. 1312) was associated with the
movement aiming at integration of all groups of people in Indo
nesia. The contemporary usage of these terms showed a parallel
68
ism with the growth of nationalism itself. The use of the word
"nationalism" in the early stages of the history of the movement
was usually accompanied by a qualifying attribute, such as Java
nese Nationalism, Indies' Nationalism, etc. and only later the term
Indonesian Nationalism became known. With the spread of the
idea of unity and the idea of freedom this term became a generally
adopted phrase among the nationalists. On the other hand the
terminology used by the colonizer was an indication of a state of
inertia in the colonial ideology.
At the same time the name "Indonesia" has a symbolizing func
tion in the history of the National Movement and the springing up
of movements with the appellation "Indonesia" is historically deter
mined and formed a new phase in the development of Indonesian
Nationalism.
What is usually called the History of the National Movement is
that part of Indonesian history covering the period beginning as
from 1908, i.e. the establishment of Boedi Oetomo as the first natio
nal organization, up to 1942, the outbreak of the Pacific War.
The National Movement as a historical phenomenon is a product
of various factors such as economic, social, political, and cultural,
with all their interrelations, involving thus a complexity and multi
dimensionality. The application of this multidisciplinary approach
will permit us to explain the various aspects of the National Move
ment. Hence it can be considered as an economic, social, political,
as well as a cultural movement or process. This is also rationalized
in the various national organizations and explicity defining its pur
poses which provide an orientation of their respective activities.
In order to comprehend the characteristics of Indonesian Natio
nalism such as manifested in the Nationalist Movement, besides
concentrating on different aspects by applying a multidisciplinary
approach, a methodological conceptualization is also necessary which
will yield concepts to be used as principles in order to enable us
to draw up characterizations and classifications.
Furthermore a chronological method will give a historical per
spective so that the dynamics of the National Movement might be
viewed clearly as a progressive movement. The scope of this paper,
however, does not allow the application of such a method; therefore,
this analysis of several aspects with the use of some concepts as a
starting point of discussion is intended merely as an introduction
to some problems of the history of the National Movement in
Indonesia.
When we take nationalism in its state of genesis as object for
study, it is necessary to keep a distance from this object. This can
be acquired through objectivication; in our case it means that we
must try to bring back every event to its situational context. Natio
nalism is a "state of mind", according to H. Kohn (1944), thus
69
added to the basic aim, i.e. the battle against "political domina
tion". (Mededeelingen, 1918, p. 2-3) Since that event the economic
struggle assumed the character of a mass movement, hence its stimu
lating influence on the political movement.
This economic movement since the end of the World War I grew
steadily to a pitch culminating in the communistic revolution of
1926.
During this period the antithesis between colonizer and colonized
became increasingly sharper. On the one side the big capitalists
with an accumulated profit of millions and millions, on the other the
mass of people suffering a "Verelendung". (Gedenkboek I.V., 1923,
p. 37) The Government of the liberal Governor General Fock (1921
26) exercized a policy of economizing, adopting exorbitant rights
while putting restrictions to the freedom of holding meetings and
of speaking, increased taxes to be borne by the people and from
which the colonial capitalist group was exempted. (Indonesia Mer
deka, 1924, p. 28-32) All these things constituted a step backward
from the policy as carried out by Governor General Van Limburg
Stirum (1916-21) who in his November-promise presumed an in
creased tempo of change in the colonial government. (Bergmeijer,
1925, p. 36, 37)
The ever deteriorating socio-economic situation urged the move
ment to switch into a more radical and revolutionary direction.
The strike of the pawnshop workers in 1922 and of the railway
labour group in 1923 were outlets of this socio-economic crisis
which the people had to go through.
The political aspects of the National Movement in those years
showed a shift towards an anti-Dutch and a non-cooperative trend.
Discrimination in the economic field such as restrictions and the
levying of special taxes on private rubber income, or the ordinance
with regard to the establishment of native sugar factories, intensi
fied the economic conflict and caused a deeper economic conscious
ness among the nationalists. (Koch, 1950, p. 61-74)
The colonial capital hampered every effort toward economic
emancipation, because the quintessence of the colonial policy
which was carried by capitalist interests was to keep colonies for
the benefit of the mother-country.
As the National Movement became aware of such a colonial
policy which granted monopolistic privileges to the group of colo
nizers, the movement moved gradually to the political plane. The
struggle against economic subjection and exploitation was fought
especially with political means based on the consciousness of the
nationalists that economic freedom would be obtained only after
political independence had been realized.
This does not mean that the plurality of the independent activi
73
ties has been abandoned; only the economic aspects however, is now
being subordinated to the political.
Rigorous measures from the side of the colonial government stir
red up much more economic orientation in some organizations such
as the Boedi Oetomo and the Partai Bangsa Indonesia (Party of the
Indonesian People). (Blumberger, 1931, p. 277-293, 433-436) Con
structive work of these parties in the economic sphere on a modest
scale gave concrete forms to the national economic aspirations and it
regarded as a stronger evidence of the self-help principle.
2) Social aspects.
When studying the history of the National Movement one observes
a tangible socio-historical phenomenon, i.e. the emergence and
development of organizations as an institutionalization of social
actions directed toward economic, political or cultural ends. Social
tensions brought about the formation of groups according to the
new stratification and differentiation. By introducing a modern
system of production and technology, Western education and
government organization, the colonial society with its semi-feudal
structure underwent a modernization with all its adherent social
changes. It resulted into the weakening of authority and prestige
of the feudal group, and the transfer of these powers to the intellec
tual group as a new ?lite; a new group-formation according to the
new social foci was going on, particularly with regard to the
National Movement. The teleological orientation of the collective
activity as exercized by these organizations expressed the specific
group-interests which was determined by the "Situation-gebunden
heit" of its constituent members.
The formation of the nationalist organizations was encouraged
by the conflict of social interests with the colonizers' group which
was the more serious because of racial differences. The organiza
tion functioned more distinctly and emphasized the difference of
interests, thus forming a means to a building-up of social power.
The Boedi Oetomo attracted members from the nobility, intellec
tuals and government employees of different strata, who were
usually called collectively by the name of "priyayi". The govern
ment employees element gave it a moderate political orientation
cooperative to the colonizer, such as preferred by the nobility.
From the time it was founded the Boedi Oetomo had never been
a mass organization as it did not succeed to draw people from the
lower classes within its circle. (Soembangsih, 1918, p. 19) Much
later, in the twenties, when the younger elements in the Boedi
Oetomo stepped to the foreground, its orientation switched to a
more progressive course. (Indonesia Merdeka, 1924, p. 19-24) The
74
4) Political aspects.
The National Movement as a form of general revivalism in a
community of colonial relation is necessarily experiencing a poli
ticalization and ever since its early stages it has actually showed
a general political orientation.
In a colonized territory the economic and political interests are
78
79
80
81
82
These principles became the guide lines for the national struggle
in the subsequent period. These formulations were the expression
of the most pure national consciousness, hence the parties which
are to realize them were regarded by the colonizer as the most
The aspect of goal-orientation is closely related to the focusing
of attention to the teleological idea of the National Movement
expressed as the objective of nationalist organizations and which
became the motivation of its activities. Viewed with the crit?rium
of freedom and national unity as essential elements of nationalism,
the objective of the National Movement experienced a progress.
The growth of this objective can be seen as a facet of the process
of integration to which the Indonesian society is being submitted.
All organizations in their respective levels were experiencing this
development. A correlation among these organizations, the inter
extreme and radical group.
2) Goal-orientation Aspect.
Action between colonial government and the nationalist groups in
their individual situation became the pushing factor towards a per
fection of the target.
With the founding of the "Volksraad" the organizations adopted
a political orientation with the aim of co-partnership in the govern
ment and democratization. The attitude towards the colonizer was
cooperative. (Koloniale Studien, 1917, II) As stated above, the
bitter experiences in the "Volksraad" which was considered as a
pseudo-parliament by the nationalists, resulted into a non-coopera
tive attitude. (Gedenkboek I. V., 1923, p. 37)
The sharpening of the conflict of interests directed the national
struggle towards the idea of liberation, also called the "Free from
Holland" movement. The conception of the idea of unity was
hampered by the basic problem regarding the leading ideology in
the independence struggle, i.e. the alternative between a religious
nationalism and an Indonesian nationalism. (Timboel, 1930, p.
300-301) The political unity of the National Movement found its
manifestations in the organizing of Permufakatan Perhimpunan2
Politik Kebangsaan Indonesia (P.P.P.K.I.) (Union of Political Asso
ciations of the Indonesian People) in 1927, as a concentration of
national organizations with the aim of political and economic inde
pendence. Although its form was federative, its idea was Indo
nesian Unitarian which fitted in the idea of unity within Indonesian
nationalism. The religious principle was recognized, but as a basis
no single religion was chosen. Herewith a firm goal of nationalism
was attained.
The next idea for unity which came up later was realized at the
Indonesia Raya Congress (Great Indonesia Congress) in 1937 and
the Political Alliance of 1939. The political aspiration was also
84
3) Affective Aspects.
Hand in hand with the various forms of consciousness and
rational confrontation against the colonial situation, we can still
point out some psychological response as a result of the social condi
tions in a colonial society, but which are not directly related to the
intellect: feelings of inferiority, fear, hostility, need for security,
desire for protection, sense of belonging, etc. These emotional
factors constituted a location of a reservoir of passions, forming
a pushing power for the National Movement. The antagonistic
relationship in a colonial society provoked passions and affectively
charged situations. What is meant by affective aspects here are the
emotional reactions which are usually designated by: sympathy, anti
pathy, hate, fear, anger, pity, etc.
The National Movement with an emotional involvement could
create a situational conflict which could be very explosive. The
affective state in the nationalist organizations may be expressed as
approval or disapproval, avoidance or intimacy toward the coloni
zer, or an attitude of loyalty or disloyalty, cooperative or non-coope
rative. At certain moments in the National Movement there were
group actions which were not based on full consciousness, but which
were caused by the effective power of common sentiments.
Sentiments of justice, solidarity or sense of belonging, feelings of
conflict, opposition or discontentness, all of these belong to the
affective elements of nationalism.
The situational conflict in a colonial society made this reservoir
of passions and emotions as a potential force of the National Move
ment, e.g. by strengthening solidarity, fostering anti-colonial or anti
Western attitudes, opposing capitalism, widening of social distances
between the colonizer and colonized, radicalism, etc.
In the National Movement moments can be pointed out in which
85
4) Colonial antithesis.
The colonial society consisted of two distinct groups, the colonizer
and the colonized, who, being two entities of opposing interests,
created a permanent situational conflict in various fields of activi
ties. The principle of discrimination in a colonial society as a
means to maintain colonial rights worsened this conflict. National
ism which was born, developed as well as realized by the National
Movement, is a form of response to that situation. Nationalism as
86
was also admitted that the Indonesian people possessed a new poli
tiacl bond the importance of which was growing gradually and be
coming more important. (Koloniaal Tijdschrift, 1925, p. 204-206)
If the Leyden-group may be considered as the idealistic exponent
of colonialism, the Utrecht group and the group of enterprisers led
by Treub could be called the materialistic group. In this antagon
ism Colijn as the leader of the Anti-Revolutionary Party represented
the middle group.
After the revolution of 1926 a violent reaction materialized in
the form of the V.C. organization and colonial materialistic ideas
as formulated by Treub came to the fore. (1927)
The importance of the social force of the National Movement was
categorically denied. The Indonesian people was regarded as im
mature for a parlementary system and autonomy, thus it was op
posed to all kinds of government change. It suggested a return to
the situation of 1900 by forming again a distance between the
people of the Netherlands and Indonesia; the government should
resume its autocratic character. (Koloniale Studien, 1928, I, p.
117-121)
Being a representative of the group of entrepreneurs it tackled
the Indonesian problem from the viewpoint of capitalistic interests
only so that it could curb by political means the emancipation efforts
of the Indonesian people.
Colijn's viewpoint (1928) was almost similar to the policy of
Treub, viz. non-acknowledgement of Indonesian unity, the Indies
were incapable of standing on its own; he was of the opinion that
one could not be certain when the time would be ripe to grant
Indonesians autonomy. (Timboel, 1928, p. 305-309)
Based on the essential differences between East and West, he re
commended that the indigenous oriental characteristic should be
maintained. Moreover he stressed affirmatively that the eastern
people had not the characteristics to enable them to assume auto
nomy. He agreed upon the idea of an eternal relationship be
tween Indonesia and the Netherlands such as professed by the
Leyden-group; the difference with Colijn was that the latter wanted
to foster this relationship by materialistic ties whereas the Leyden
group stressed on spiritual bounds.
The development of the colonial ideology as the antithesis of a
contemporary nationalistic utopism involved a most extensive prob
lem, namely, the relations between East and West.
The problem of East-West relations was contemplated by the
colonial groups and idealists of colonialism, in which the relations
between East and West were treated nomatively by presuming the
principle of Western superiority and its substantial difference with
the East. This way of thinking may, therefore, be considered as a
rationalization of colonial policy which desired paternalization and
89
REFERENCES
94