Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUMMARY of dissent:
-Should an industrial partner be responsible for such losses, for
such obligations in favor of third persons? Article 141
expressly states that he shall not.
- An industrial partner has not contributed any property
whatever; he therefore offers no subject for the
principal and direct seizure when the assets of the
copartnership are attached. How is it possible to
conceive any ulterior, subsidiary, indirect responsibility
over the property which it was not even thought to be
included, since he only contributed to the company his
industry and work, not property of any class whatever?