You are on page 1of 8

Transport Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers

Volume 168 Issue TR3 Transport 168 June 2015 Issue TR3
Pages 231–238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/tran.12.00058
Serviceability and structural performance of Paper 1200058
asphalt overlays Received 23/06/2012 Accepted 22/10/2013
Published online 23/01/2014
Cülfik Keywords: bitumen & tar/field testing & monitoring/pavement design

ICE Publishing: All rights reserved

Serviceability and structural


performance of asphalt overlays
Mehmet Sait Cülfik PhD
Secretary General, BEBKA Development Agency, Bursa, Turkey

The serviceability and structural performance of pre-constructed thin asphalt overlays, laid on an existing concrete
base, were tested and the correlation between them was observed. Based on the results of present serviceability
index readings, the change in serviceability of different types of asphalt concrete was observed and a statistical test
was conducted to see if there was a significant change in the present serviceability index of each highway test
section. Two present serviceability index measurements and three visual pavement condition surveys were conducted
on eastbound and westbound test sections on IH-20 in Atlanta, USA. The results from field tests conducted on thin
(100 mm) asphalt concrete overlays on Portland cement concrete pavements indicated that the change in present
serviceability index of asphalt concrete is affected by the type of mixture and the aggregate used in the design and
the initial condition of the concrete base. A high correlation between structural performance and the serviceability of
thin asphalt concrete overlays was observed.

Notation serviceability index (PSI), which is the performance measure


di difference between the ith observed values from the used in this study.
two populations
mD difference between group means The PSI was developed as a result of AASHTO road tests in
P-value area under the t-distribution curve for t , t-statistics 1960. It is calculated for flexible pavements based on observa-
S 2D variability of groups tions of rut depth (RD), slope variance (SV) and extent of
t-statistic ratio of difference between group means and cracking (C) and patching (P) (in ft2 per 1000 ft2 (1 ft2 ¼
variability of groups 929 cm2 ) using (Bednar, 1989)
tÆ critical value of the t-distribution at Æ significance
Æ level of significance PSI ¼ 5:03  1:91log10 (1 þ SV)

1:  1:38RD2  0:01(C þ P)0:5


1. Introduction
A central principle of the design methodology of the American
Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials The index has a range from 0 to 5, with 0 being the worst and 5
(AASHTO, 1993) is the relationship between serviceability and the best serviceability performance. As can be seen in Equation
performance (Carey and Irick, 1960). There are three accepted 1, the PSI is driven primarily by the slope variance, which
measures of pavement performance – safety, structural perform- represents pavement roughness, with the other factors providing
ance and functional performance (serviceability). Safety is most only small contributions.
commonly measured in terms of the frictional characteristics of a
pavement. Structural performance is a measure of the pavement’s Among the various options for rigid pavement restoration works,
ability to resist deformation under traffic loads. It is most the construction of a hot-mix asphalt (HMA) overlay over an
commonly measured in terms of distress such as cracking or existing concrete pavement is considered to be the most common
rutting. Serviceability is a measure of the pavement’s ability to (PCS, 1991; Timm and Warren, 2004). Thin asphalt concrete
serve users over time. It is usually measured in terms of the (AC) overlays have been proven to be a cost-effective means to
roughness or ride quality of the pavement surface (Hand et al., extend pavement service life (Chou et al., 2008), with benefits
1999). Serviceability is the most commonly modelled measure including improved ride quality and pavement surface condition.
and this is partially attributable to the fact that most network Thin asphalt overlays, however, are effective only when placed in
performance measurement systems in use today are designed to accordance with the pavement preservation philosophy that
measure pavement functional condition. This is achieved through requires the application to be before the pavement has reached a
the use of a previously calibrated performance index formula to critical distress level (Newcomb, 2009).
weigh each of the measured distress modes. One of the most
widely used functional performance indicators is the present Thin asphalt overlays are expected to increase service life by 10

231
Downloaded by [ University of Hong Kong] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Transport Serviceability and structural performance
Volume 168 Issue TR3 of asphalt overlays
Cülfik

years for asphalt pavements and 6–10 years for concrete or binder. The asphalt binder can influence both the adhesion
composite pavements (Newcomb, 2009). Trevino et al. (2004) between itself and the aggregate, and cohesion of the asphalt.
studied the applicability of thin asphalt overlays on continuously Adhesion is influenced by the chemistry of the asphalt and the
reinforced concrete pavements. They attributed the increase in stiffness of the binder. The cohesive strength of an asphalt matrix
service life to a reduction in dynamic impact loading as a result in the presence of moisture is also influenced by the chemical
of the overlay. However, this benefit is only redeemable if timely nature of the binder and processing techniques (Little and Jones,
application is carried out. An AC overlay is also effective in 2003).
reducing the noise that is generated at the road and vehicle tyre
interface; pavement serviceability and skid resistance are consid- The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation
erably improved and rutting distress is effectively corrected between structural performance and serviceability of AC layers of
(Huddleston, 2009). different highway test sections with different mix designs or
aggregates.
Thin asphalt overlays (less than 5 in (12.7 cm) thick) only improve
functional performance and in no way impact the structural load-
2. Experimental design
carrying capacity of the pavement, either positively or negatively.
It is thus essential to use an overlay only on a structurally sound 2.1 Test sections
pavement, otherwise the benefits are lost (Trevino et al., 2004). In total, nine different test sections on the eastbound and
Before application, any distress in the pavement should be westbound IH-20 in Atlanta, USA were considered. Each test
corrected and all cracks should be sealed (Newcomb, 2009). In section had a different mix design or aggregate type. Three
the case of an excessively cracked and rough surface, milling different mix designs (CMBH-C, type C and Superpave) and
should be considered (Newcomb, 2009). If not repaired, cracks three different aggregates types (quartzite, gravel and sandstone)
may reflect through the asphalt overlay, thus defeating its very were combined, resulting in a total of nine mix designs. For all
purpose (Trevino et al., 2004). The term given to this process is test sections, the thickness of the asphalt overlay, laid on an
‘reflection cracking’ and it results in a significant reduction in existing concrete base, was 100 mm. The location of the test
pavement serviceability (Ceylan et al., 2008). The movement of a sections is shown in Figure 1. The section names and properties
Portland cement concrete pavement (caused by dynamic traffic of the eastbound and westbound lanes are listed in Table 1.
loading or thermally induced expansions and contractions, or
both) causes excessively high strains to develop at the bottom of 2.2 Materials
the HMA overlay above the joints and cracks of the pavement; Table 2 shows the aggregate type and surface mixes for the nine
this leads to progression of the crack upwards, resulting in sections considered in this study. A PG 76-22 was used for all
reflection (or reflective) cracking (Johnson and Freeman, 2002). nine mix designs prepared for this project. A type B base course
In climates such as Wisconsin, USA, initial reflection cracks often was used as a base for all AC overlays in all sections. The milled
appear within a year or two (Makowski et al., 2005). Debonding concrete pavement was overlaid with this 5.1 cm thick type B
is also a common problem with overlays (Trevino et al., 2004). base course. The base course was designed as a mixture of
90% limestone from Hanson, TX and 10% field sand from
Aggregate properties are critical to thin asphalt overlay perform- Marshall, TX.
ance. Aggregates can greatly affect the bond strength in a mixture
depending on its susceptibility to moisture. The aggregate surface 2.3 Mix designs
chemistry and the presence of clay fines are also important Three 12.5 mm Superpave mixes, three CMHB-C mixes, three type
factors affecting the adhesion between aggregate and asphalt C mixes and one type B base course were designed for this project.

Beginning End
of project of N
station 1135⫹00 project
Weight-in-motion
43
Westbound

3 8 5 2

20 20

6 9 1 4 7

3251 Eastbound
Weight-in-motion

Figure 1. Layout of test sections

232
Downloaded by [ University of Hong Kong] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Transport Serviceability and structural performance
Volume 168 Issue TR3 of asphalt overlays
Cülfik

Sandstone
Section Station numbers Mixture type Aggregate
100
1 1218–1245 Superpave Gravel Quartzite

Cumulative pass: %
2 1278–1321 Superpave Sandstone 80
3 1135–1188 Superpave Quartzite
Siliceous gravel
4 1245–1285 CMHB-C Gravel 60
5 1235–1278 CMHB-C Sandstone
6 1135–1185 CMHB-C Quartzite 40
7 1285–1321 Type C Gravel
20
8 1193–1235 Type C Sandstone
9 1190–1218 Type C Quartzite
0
0·075 0·15 0·3 0·6 1·18 2·36 4·75 9·5 12·5 19
Table 1. Test sections
Sieve size: mm

Figure 2. Aggregate gradations for Superpave mixes

12.5 mm CMHB-C Type C Total


Superpave (voids filled with asphalt) specification was set between 65 and
75%. At the initial number of gyrations, the densification
Gravel 1 1 1 3
requirement is a maximum of 89.0%; at the maximum number of
Quartzite 1 1 1 3
gyrations, the maximum densification requirement is 98.0%.
Sandstone 1 1 1 3
Acceptable dust portion values are between 0.6 and 1.2 for all
Total 3 3 3
Superpave mixes. All three mixes used in this study satisfied
Table 2. Aggregates used for different surface mix designs these requirements.

2.3.2 CMHB-C mixes


The three CMHB-C mixes were made of
For each Superpave mix design, three trial blends were attempted.
These trial blends were evaluated by compacting specimens and j 79% siliceous gravel, 20% igneous screenings and 1% lime,
determining the volumetric properties of each trial blend. Accep- with a DAB content of 4.7%
table trial blends were selected for each Superpave mix design. j 87% quartzite, 12% igneous screenings and 1% lime; DAB
After the selection of trial blends, specimens were compacted at content of 4.8%
three different asphalt contents. Volumetric properties were calcu- j 87% sandstone, 12% igneous screenings and 1% lime; DAB
lated at the design number of gyrations. Based on the estimated content of 4.8%.
relations between asphalt content and volumetric properties, the
design asphalt contents were established at 4% air voids. Figure 3 shows the aggregate gradations for these mixes. The
level of air voids at design was 3.5% for the CMHB-C mixes.
2.3.1 Superpave mixes
Three Superpave mixes were studied
Quartzite
j 67% siliceous gravel, 32% limestone screenings and 1% 100
Sandstone
Cumulative pass: %

lime; the design asphalt binder (DAB) content for this mix
80
was 5.0%
Siliceous gravel
j 91% sandstone, 8% igneous screenings and 1% lime, with
60
DAB content of 5.1%
j 89% quartzite, 10% igneous screenings and 1% lime, with 40
DAB content of 5.1%.
20
Each Superpave mix designs’ gradations falls below the Super-
pave restricted zone. The aggregate gradations for these mixes 0
are shown in Figure 2. #200 #80 #40 #10 #4 3/8⬙ 5/8⬙ 7/8⬙
Sieve size

In keeping with standard Superpave design requirements, the Figure 3. Aggregate gradations for CMHB-C mixes
12.5 mm size mandated a minimum VMA (voids in mineral (1/80 ¼ 3.175 mm)
aggregate) of 14%. Assuming a standard traffic level, the VFA

233
Downloaded by [ University of Hong Kong] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Transport Serviceability and structural performance
Volume 168 Issue TR3 of asphalt overlays
Cülfik

2.3.3 Type C mixes severity of different types of distress as explained in the Strategic
Aggregate gradations for type C mixes are shown in Figure 4. Highway Research Program (SHRP) distress identification man-
The three types used are ual (Hawks et al., 1993).

j 61% siliceous gravel, 30% limestone screenings, 8% igneous On both the eastbound and westbound lanes, PSI values were
screenings and 1% lime; the DAB content for this mix was estimated for the inside and outside lanes separately. PSI values
4.4% obtained just after construction of the new asphalt overlay (PSI-
j 91% quartzite, 8% igneous screenings and 1% lime; DAB Fin) and PSI values obtained 11 months after (PSI-Nov02) are
content of 4.6% compared for each test section separately. The data were collected
j 99% sandstone and 1% lime; DAB content of 4.5%. with high-speed PSI measurements using two lasers, one on each
wheel path, and an accelerometer. The lasers allowed calculation
3. Visual condition survey and PSI of the profile of the longitudinal sections on each wheel path and
measurements the PSI values were then calculated from these data.
Three visual condition surveys were conducted. The first was
carried out on the concrete base, after milling and before 3.1 Visual pavement condition survey results
placement of the asphalt overlay. The second and third surveys Table 3 shows the number of transverse cracks observed on the
were conducted on the new asphalt overlay after 1 and 11 months. AC overlay after 1 and 11 months, classified as low, moderate
The surveys included the collection of general information on the and high transverse cracks as defined in the SHRP distress
identification manual (Hawks et al., 1993). Table 3 clearly shows
Siliceous gravel that there were no cracks on the newly placed AC overlay and the
100
number of cracks increased with time. Table 4 shows the existing
cracks on the concrete base after milling and before the new AC
Cumulative pass: %

Quartzite
80 layer was placed. In addition to some patching, there were low
Sandstone and moderate transverse cracks on the concrete base.
60
Figure 5 shows the number of transverse cracks on the AC
40
overlay. In all sections apart from sections 3 and 5, the number of
20 cracks increased between the second and the third set of readings.
After 1 month, the best performance in terms of structural
0 performance was observed in section 3 (Superpave with quartzite
#200 #80 #40 #10 #4 3/8⬙ 5/8⬙ 7/8⬙ aggregate) where no cracking was observed. The aggregate type
Sieve size
used in each section is also shown in Figure 5 (sections 2, 5 and
Figure 4. Aggregate gradations for type C mixes 8, sandstone; sections 3, 6 and 9, quartzite; sections 1, 4 and 7,
(1/80 ¼ 3.175 mm) gravel). The asphalt sections containing sandstone showed the
highest number of cracks and the lowest number of cracks

Section Number of transverse cracks

Initial After 1 month After 11 months

Low Moderate High Total Low Moderate High Total

2 0 2 2 0 4 1 5 2 8
5 0 2 1 0 3 1 1 0 2
8 0 5 0 0 5 3 4 2 9
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2
9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 3
4 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 3
7 0 1 0 0 1 3 2 0 5

Table 3. Number of transverse cracks in test sections at different


survey times

234
Downloaded by [ University of Hong Kong] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Transport Serviceability and structural performance
Volume 168 Issue TR3 of asphalt overlays
Cülfik

Section Low transverse Moderate transverse Patching Total number of


cracks cracks cracks

2 30 33 28 119
5 12 66 27 132
8 15 115 39 208
3 8 15 10 43
6 190 0 29 248
9 219 0 37 293
1 129 0 31 191
4 141 6 39 225
7 89 1 30 150

Table 4. Existing number of cracks on concrete base

Initial 1-month 11-months 300 Patching


Moderate transverse cracks
Number of cracks in concrete base

10 Sandstone
250 Low transverse cracks



Number of transverse cracks

9 37
8 0
200 29
7 0
6 Gravel 39


5 150 39 31 6
0
4 219
3 Quartzite 100 190 30
27 1


28 141
2 115 129
1 50 33 66 89
0 10
30 15
2 5 8 3 6 9 1 4 7 12 15 8
0
Test sections 2 5 8 3 6 9 1 4 7
Test sections
Figure 5. Number of transverse cracks in asphalt pavement for
each section at different survey dates Figure 6. Number of cracks in concrete base

occurred on the sections including quartzite; for the sections cracks in the concrete base. This supports the conclusion that
including gravel, the number of cracks was in between those of both the type of aggregate and the initial concrete base condition
the sandstone and quartzite pavements. In summary, the type of affect crack formation in AC overlays.
aggregate used in the test sections seems to affect crack forma-
tion in the pavement over time and the best results were achieved 3.2 PSI measurement results
on the sections where quartzite was used. For each test section at the same station, two sets of PSI
measurements were taken: just after the AC pavement was placed
In addition to the effect of aggregate type on asphalt pavement (PSI-Fin) and 11 months later (PSI-Nov02). On both eastbound
performance, it was noted that the initial condition of the and westbound lanes, the PSI values were calculated for the
concrete base can affect the formation of cracks. Table 4 and inside and outside lanes separately. Table 5 shows the average PSI
Figure 6 show the number of cracks – including both transverse values for each section and it is clear that PSI-Fin and PSI-Nov02
cracks and patching on the concrete base – before the asphalt values are very close. A t-test was thus performed on the PSI
pavement was placed. Existing transverse cracks and the edges of measurements to see if the changes were significant.
patching on the concrete base were expected to affect crack
formation in the asphalt pavement. Comparison of Figures 5 and 4. Statistical analysis of PSI data
6 shows the difference between the last condition of the asphalt In order to assess the change in PSI of the AC overlays in
pavement and the initial condition of the concrete base, and 11 months, a t-test was conducted for each set of data from each
reveals the possible effects of distress in the concrete base on section. The t-test assesses whether the means of two groups of
crack formation in the AC overlay. Figure 5 shows that the data are statistically different from each other. When looking at
highest number of cracks in the AC overlays in the first month the differences between scores for two groups, the difference
occurred on sections 2, 5 and 8 while Figure 6 shows that these between their means relative to the spread or variability of their
were the sections with the greatest number of moderate transverse scores must be judged. The formula for the t-test is

235
Downloaded by [ University of Hong Kong] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Transport Serviceability and structural performance
Volume 168 Issue TR3 of asphalt overlays
Cülfik

Section Average Average 1 X n


S 2D ¼ (di  mD )2
PSI-Fin PSI-Nov02 5: n  1 i¼1

Eastbound outside lane 6 4.469 4.486


9 4.459 4.401 and
1 4.570 4.506
4 4.670 4.711 6: di ¼ (PSI-Fin)i  (PSI-Nov02)i
7 4.470 4.493
Eastbound inside lane 6 4.604 4.629
9 4.464 4.406 in which (PSI-Fin) i and (PSI-Nov02) i are the ith observed values
1 4.519 4.507 from the two populations PSI-Fin and PSI-Nov02.
4 4.574 4.684
7 4.157 4.147 Once the t-statistic is computed, a table of significance is
Westbound outside lane 2 4.386 4.405 consulted to test whether it is large enough to say that the
5 4.408 4.393 difference between PSI-Fin and PSI-Nov02 is not likely to have
8 4.562 4.430 been a chance finding. To test the significance, a risk level is set
3 4.667 4.673 (called the level of significance) as Æ ¼ 0.05. This means that, on
Westbound inside lane 2 4.229 4.363 average, five times out of a hundred there would be a statistically
5 4.219 4.260 significant difference between the means given that there were
8 4.119 3.993 none (i.e. ‘by chance’). Having the Æ ¼ 0.05 level of significance,
3 4.520 4.546 the degrees of freedom (v ¼ n  1) and the t-statistic value, a
standard table of significance can be consulted to determine
Table 5. Average PSI values of each section whether the t-statistic is large enough to be significant. If it is,
the difference between PSI-Fin and PSI-Nov 02 is statistically
significant and thus it can be concluded that the PSI of the AC
overlay decreased in 11 months.

Difference between group means


t-statistic ¼ The hypotheses for testing whether the difference between the
2: Variability of groups two group means is significant in a one-tailed problem are as
follows.

The denominator of Equation 2 is called the standard error of j Null hypothesis: for a given section, PSI-Fin ¼ PSI-Nov02.
difference. In this study, the means of PSI values measured at the j Alternate hypothesis: for a given section, PSI-Fin . PSI-
same station points at different dates were compared. The two Nov02.
sets of data (PSI-Fin, PSI-Nov02) for each section are thus said j Criteria: reject the null hypothesis and accept alternate
to be paired, meaning that PSI-Fin and PSI-Nov02 represent the hypothesis if t-statistic . tÆ, where tÆ is the critical value of
same variable under two different conditions. In other words, the t-distribution at Æ ¼ 0.05 significance level.
these two random samples are not independent. Consequently, for
the t-test, the paired sample test was used, a criterion of which is A one-tailed t-test was performed because the question that
that the number of points in each dataset must be the same and needed to be answered by means of the t-test was: is PSI-
they must be organised in pairs such that there is a definite Fin . PSI-Nov02? If PSI-Fin , PSI-Nov02, the null hypothesis is
relationship between each pair. Therefore accepted regardless of how much smaller PSI-Fin is than PSI-
Nov02.
mD
t-statistic ¼
3: S D =n1=2 Another way of comparing PSI-Fin and PSI-Nov02 values with
the t-test is to calculate the P-value for each test section, this
value being the area under the t-distribution curve for t ,
where the difference between group means is given by t-statistic. Since in this t-test the significance level was 0.05, it
needs to be checked whether or not the P-value is greater than
1X n 0.05 for each section. If P-value . 0.05, the null hypothesis is
mD ¼ di accepted and it is concluded that PSI-Fin ¼ PSI-Nov02.
4: n i¼1

The t-test results are given in Table 6: mD , SD , t-statistic, tÆ and


P-values are given for each section. The results show that, only
the variability of groups is for the inside and outside lanes of section 8, the t-statistics are

236
Downloaded by [ University of Hong Kong] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Transport Serviceability and structural performance
Volume 168 Issue TR3 of asphalt overlays
Cülfik

Section mD SD tÆ t-statistic P-value

Eastbound outside lane 6 0.017 0.109 1.943 0.415 0.654


9 0.057 0.078 1.943 1.927 0.051
1 0.064 0.116 1.943 1.470 0.096
4 0.041 0.116 1.943 0.949 0.810
7 0.023 0.153 1.943 0.395 0.647
Eastbound inside lane 6 0.024 0.062 1.943 1.043 0.831
9 0.059 0.101 1.943 1.528 0.089
1 0.011 0.111 1.943 0.272 0.397
4 0.110 0.200 1.943 1.456 0.902
7 0.010 0.296 1.943 0.089 0.466
Westbound outside lane 2 0.019 0.103 1.895 0.520 0.689
5 0.015 0.139 1.895 0.306 0.384
8 0.132 0.168 1.860 2.360 0.023
3 0.006 0.155 1.833 0.122 0.547
Westbound inside lane 2 0.134 0.155 1.895 2.443 0.978
5 0.041 0.096 1.895 1.216 0.868
8 0.126 0.156 1.860 2.415 0.021
3 0.026 0.140 1.833 0.588 0.715

Table 6. t-test results for each test section

larger than tÆ and, for the same section, P-value , 0.05. This sections, the serviceability index did not change significantly over
means that, for this section, the null hypothesis is rejected and this period of time.
the alternate hypothesis is accepted, meaning that PSI-Fin . PSI-
Nov02. For all other sections, t-statistic , tÆ : the null hypothesis Both visual pavement condition surveys and PSI measurements
is thus accepted, meaning that PSI-Fin ¼ PSI-Nov02 with a thus showed that the worst serviceability and structural perform-
significance level of 95%. In other words, except for section 8, all ance was given by section 8, which is probably a result of
sections’ serviceability indices did not decrease with a signifi- material properties and the initial condition of the concrete base.
cance level of 95% over the 11 month period. The test results show a high correlation between structural
performance and serviceability of thin AC overlay sections,
5. Conclusion especially for section 8, and this highlights the importance of
Based on the results of the visual pavement condition surveys and aggregate properties and initial base conditions for AC overlay
PSI measurements, the structural performance and serviceability performance.
of different types of AC overlays were assessed. A statistical test
was conducted on the PSI data to determine the change in On the other hand, the test results did not show any clear
serviceability index of each highway test section. evidence for the effect of different mix designs on the overall
performance of AC overlays placed on an existing concrete base
Visual surveys showed that, compared with other sections, a and this needs further studies. Similarly, although there were
significant number of cracks occurred on sections 2, 5 and 8. significant numbers of cracks on test sections 5 and 2, no change
Although the mix design was different for each of these sections, in PSI value was observed for these sections. Further study is
the type of aggregate used in these sections was the same, namely thus needed to assess the effect of existing concrete base
sandstone. It is notable that among these sections, the highest conditions on AC overlay serviceability.
number of cracks occurred on section 8. Significantly, the initial
condition survey revealed that there were a significant number of REFERENCES
moderate transverse cracks in the concrete base of sections 2, 5 AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and
and 8 before placement of the AC layer, with the highest number Transportation Officials) (1993) Guide for Design of
on section 8. Pavement Structures. AASHTO, Washington, DC, USA.
Bednar J (1989) Pavement performance curves: four case studies.
Statistical analysis of the PSI data showed that, for the inside and Public Roads 53(3): 90–99.
outside lanes of section 8, the serviceability index changed Carey W and Irick P (1960) The pavement serviceability-
significantly during the 11 month study period. For the other performance concept. HRB Bulletin 250: 40–58.

237
Downloaded by [ University of Hong Kong] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
Transport Serviceability and structural performance
Volume 168 Issue TR3 of asphalt overlays
Cülfik

Ceylan H, Gopalakrishnan K, Coree BJ, Kota T and Mathews R Little DN and Jones IVDR (2003) Chemical and mechanical
(2008) Rehabilitation of concrete pavements utilizing processes of moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt pavements.
rubblization: a mechanistic based approach to HMA overlay Transportation Research Board National Seminar, San Diego,
thickness design. International Journal of Pavement CA, USA, pp. 37–70.
Engineering 9(1): 45–57. Makowski L, Bischoff DL, Blankenship P, Sobczak D and Haulter
Chou E, Datta D and Pulugurta H (2008) Effectiveness of Thin F (2005) Wisconsin experiences with reflective crack relief
Hot Mix Asphalt Overlay on Pavement Ride and Condition projects. Transportation Research Record 1905:
Performance. Ohio Department of Transportation, Columbus, 44–55.
OH, USA, Report FHWA/OH-2008/4. Newcomb DE (2009) Thin Asphalt Overlay for Pavement
Hand AJ, Sebaaly PE and Epps JA (1999) Development of Preservation. National Asphalt Pavement Association,
performance models based on department of transportation Lanham, MD, USA, Information series 135.
pavement management system data. Transportation Research PCS (Pavement Consultancy Services) (1991) PCS Guidelines and
Record 1684: 215–22. Methodologies for the Rehabilitation of Rigid Highway
Hawks N, Teng T, Bellinger W, Rogers R, Baker C, Brosseau K Pavements using Asphalt Concrete Overlays. Executive
et al. (1993) Distress Identification Manual for the Long Summary. PCS, Beltsville, MD, USA.
Term Pavement Performance Project. National Research Timm DH and Warren AM (2004) Performance of Rubblized
Council, Washington, DC, USA, SHRP-P-338, pp. 375–379. Pavement Sections in Alabama. Highway Research Center,
Huddleston J (2009) Thin and ultra thin asphalt overlays for Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA, IR-04-02.
pavement preservation. Proceedings of NW Pavement Trevino M, Dossey T, McCullough BF and Yildirim Y (2004)
Management Conference, Vancouver, WA, USA. Applicability of Asphalt Concrete Overlays on
Johnson D and Freeman R (2002) Rehabilitation Techniques for Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavements. Center for
Stripped Asphalt Pavements. Western Transportation Institute, Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, TX,
Montana State University, Bozeman, MY, USA, Report USA, Research TDoTOo, Implementation T, Research
FHWA/Mt-002-003/8123. UoTaACfT.

WHAT DO YOU THINK?


To discuss this paper, please email up to 500 words to the
editor at journals@ice.org.uk. Your contribution will be
forwarded to the author(s) for a reply and, if considered
appropriate by the editorial panel, will be published as a
discussion in a future issue of the journal.
Proceedings journals rely entirely on contributions sent in
by civil engineering professionals, academics and students.
Papers should be 2000–5000 words long (briefing papers
should be 1000–2000 words long), with adequate illustra-
tions and references. You can submit your paper online via
www.icevirtuallibrary.com/content/journals, where you
will also find detailed author guidelines.

238
Downloaded by [ University of Hong Kong] on [16/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.

You might also like