accountability in the healthcare divisionof a local self- government. It highlights theunderlying tension between the elected representatives'need to control the divisionand the executive's need for basic functionaland financial autonomy in developing and maintaining the division as a useful andresponsive facility to the public. It raises questions as to the concept of cost andresponsibility centres in local self-governmentsand what happens when one of theresponsibility centres starts generating revenue and becomes a truly profit centre.Since the basic nature of the service is more of a responsibility — do the surpluses generated by the new profit centre get ploughed back to the same facility or should it get into the general pool of the Panchayat? If the argument is that it should be ploughed back to the responsibility centre to improve the overall facilities of the division, then should the objectives of the division be redefined and what should be the most appropriate institutional mechanism to grant autonomy for a division that is doing well? How would these mechanisms work in the long run? The case tries to sensitize the discussants to the issues and tensions that emerge in a well-managed division of a local-self-government. It also raises the larger issue of autonomy and accountability in democratic institutions.
Problem:
The main problem faced by nagar panchayat was the lack
in payment for the employees selected on a ad hoc basis i.e unplanned ,was to be given by the panchayat. And there was serious l ack of inventory management mechanisms at the pharmacy division and dependency on private labs for tests.,the main problem is that there was no direct executionary power to the CMO, and the panchayt do not invest more in buying equipments rather they did spend on other resources which are not related to health care facilities or to the hospital.The main core problem in this case is about the donation, where watever money comes under the name of hospital goes to panchayat ,there is no proper sufficient dunds supplies to the hospital and also as mentioned in the case that there is only 9staff working in the hospital, there is lacl in doctors and as Mr.balu only the physian it takes longer waiting time for the patient to do their checking.final problem was that whether the hosptal will remain or sustain in the future when there is absence of the present CMO.
Solutions :
It is better to meke the hospital autonomy to l increase
the value of the hospital.and they can Appoint qualified people in the hospitalto reach the objective of the hospital, through Effective communication between the CMO and the panchayat people, can make the issue understandable nad try to sole the issue and also they can see to that they can Maintain separate doc’s specialized in their fields to the patients,
Implementations::
As said in the problem s that they should revenue generate
from the hospital should be used only for the health care services. And they should Create a formal hierarchy in the hospital right from superior to lower level inorder to have a proper suppl of information and in mean to run the hospital very smoothly.