Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M Arroyo-Kalin
3.1 Introduction
The majority of terra preta expanses in the central Amazon region are open air
archaeological sites that track the location of pre-Columbian settlements on relatively
flat, mostly non-flooding landforms in the immediate vicinity of rivers, lakes and
streamlets (Hilbert 1968; Simões 1974; Heckenberger et al. 1999; Neves 2003). The
distinctively dark topsoil at these locales often includes abundant charcoal and
archaeological artefacts. Vertical exposures through ‘flat’ areas reveal an A horizon
of deeper reach than the surrounding soil mantle in which it is generally possible to
distinguish one or more subhorizons – A1, A2, A3 and so forth – based on subtle
contrasts in soil structure, texture, colour and inclusions. The transition from A to
underlying B horizon sediments, in turn, oftentimes appears as an AB, A/B and/or
B/A sequence that shows down-mixing of enriched A horizon material into deeper B
horizon sediments. These characteristics appear to be shared by many exemplars of
anthropogenic dark earths in the tropical lowlands of northern South America (e.g.
Mora 1991; Kern 1996; Vacher et al. 1998; see Kämpf et al. 2003 for an overview).
Although it cannot be doubted that the A horizon of artefact-rich anthropogenic
dark earths, or terras pretas, is a result of the deposition and/or decomposition of
debris associated to pre-Columbian settlement dynamics (Sombroek 1966; Smith
1980; Kern and Kämpf 1989; Kern 1996; Kern et al. 2004; Woods 1995; Woods and
McCann 1999; Woods and Glaser 2004; see also Erickson 2003), to characterise the
dark and organic-rich sediments of these soils as thick A horizons that have
expanded downwards understates the exact nature of the processes that resulted in
their formation. Over 35 years ago, Lathrap (1970) vehemently defended the sug-
gestion that stratigraphic distinctions were visible or inferable in vertical sections
of Amazonian open air sites and advocated their study as an integral part of recon-
structions of pre-Columbian history (see also discussions in Eden et al. 1984;
Lathrap and Oliver 1987; Myers 2004). Echoing his remarks over two decades later,
excavations by the Central Amazon Project (Heckenberger et al. 1999; Petersen
et al. 2001; Neves 2003) show that ceramic shards found embedded in expanses of
terras pretas can be classified into distinct phases, complexes and/or traditions.
Importantly, radiocarbon dates show that ceramic phases are constrained chrono-
logically to a few hundred years yet, with some important gaps in the early part of
the first millennium AD, span in excess of 1,000 calendar years (Neves 2003;
Petersen et al. 2003; Petersen et al. 2004; Lima et al. 2006; Moraes 2006; Arroyo-
Kalin 2008).
Archaeological investigations of terra preta expanses demonstrate that single-
phase sites show a relatively thin and less strongly melanised A horizon compared to
multi-phase sites. In the latter, archaeological remains are deposited within often
thicker and darker A horizon sediments in generally ‘good’ stratigraphic order, i.e.
older artefacts are generally found underlying younger ones (Hilbert 1968; Donatti
2003; Machado 2005; Moraes 2006). It is important to highlight that the stratigraphic
integrity of these remains cannot be explained by invoking their concerted sinking as
a result of faunally-induced gravitational displacement (Darwin 1881; Johnson 1990):
not only do vertical exposures of anthropogenic dark earths lack horizontally-trans-
gressive alignments of ceramic shards that could be interpreted as analogues of
biotically-produced stone lines, but carefully-controlled excavations also frequently
record archaeological features – pits, post hole negatives, and the like – whose very
presence and edge definition contradicts the suggestion that these deposits have been
reworked by soil fauna to the point of obliterating stratigraphic distinctions. In addi-
tion, a growing body of evidence shows that broad stratigraphic contiguity can be
ascertained at the level of the expanse in different terra preta deposits (Heckenberger
et al. 1999; Rebellato 2007, and this volume Chapter 2; Arroyo-Kalin 2008).
In another chapter, my colleagues and I have summarised a series of findings,
questions and hypotheses about the composition of anthropogenic dark earths in the
central Amazon region (Arroyo-Kalin et al., this volume). In this complementary
contribution, I examine the development of these soils as an outcome of the pro-
gressive burial of subsequent land surfaces, i.e. the build-up of the soil mantle over