Malixi vs. Mexicali Philippine

2/7/22, 3:39 PM G.R. No. 205061, June 08, 2016 - EMERTIA G. MALIXI, Petitioner, v.
Petitioner, v. MEXICALI PHILIPPINES AND/OR FRANCESCA MABANTA,…
Live Virtual Event

Click to learn more and register now
Acronis Open
Home Law Firm Law Library Laws Jurisprudence
Search

ChanRobles Professional
Review, Inc.

June 2016 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions
Philippine Supreme Court

Jurisprudence

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2016 > June 2016 Decisions >
G.R.
No. 205061, June 08, 2016 - EMERTIA G. MALIXI, Petitioner, v. MEXICALI
PHILIPPINES AND/OR FRANCESCA MABANTA, Respondents.:

ChanRobles On-Line Bar

Review
G.R. No. 205061, June 08, 2016 - EMERTIA G. MALIXI, Petitioner, v. MEXICALI
PHILIPPINES AND/OR FRANCESCA MABANTA, Respondents.
SECOND DIVISION
G.R. No. 205061, June 08, 2016
EMERTIA G. MALIXI, Petitioner, v. MEXICALI PHILIPPINES AND/OR

FRANCESCA MABANTA, Respondents.
https://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016junedecisions.php?id=394 1/32
2/7/22, 3:39 PM G.R. No. 205061, June 08, 2016 - EMERTIA G. MALIXI, Petitioner, v. MEXICALI PHILIPPINES AND/OR FRANCESCA MABANTA,…

DECISION
Ads by
DEL CASTILLO, J.:
Send feedback Why this ad?
Before us is a Petition for Review on Certiorari1 seeking to set aside the August 29,
2012 Decision2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 115413, which
dismissed the Petition for Certiorari filed therewith and affirmed the May 28, 2010
Resolution3 of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reinstating

respondents Mexicali Philippines (Mexicali) and Francesca Mabanta's appeal, partly
granting it and ordering petitioner Emerita G. Malixi's (petitioner) reinstatement but
without the payment of backwages. Likewise assailed is the December 14, 2012
Resolution4 of the CA denying petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration.5
Antecedent Facts
ChanRobles CPA Review
Online
This case arose from an Amended Complaint6 for illegal dismissal and nonpayment of

service charges, moral and exemplary damages and attorney's fees filed by petitioner
against respondents Mexicali and its General Manager, Francesca Mabanta, on
February 4, 2009 before the Labor Arbiter, docketed as NLRC NCR Case No. 12-
17618-08.

Petitioner alleged that on August 12, 2008, she was hired by respondents as a team
leader assigned at the delivery service, receiving a daily wage of Three Hundred
Eighty Two Pesos (P382.00) sans employment contract and identification card (ID). In
October 2008, Mexicali's training officer, Jay Teves (Teves), informed her of the
management's intention to transfer and appoint her as store manager at a newly
opened branch in Alabang Town Center, which is a joint venture between Mexicali and
Calexico Food Corporation (Calexico), due to her satisfactory performance. She was
apprised that her monthly salary as the new store manager would be Fifteen
Thousand Pesos (P15,000,00) with service charge, free meal and side tip. She then
ChanRobles Special Lecture
Series
subsequently submitted a resignation letter7 dated October 15, 2008, as advised by

Teves. On October 17, 2008, she started working as the store manager of Mexicali in
Alabang Town Center although, again, no employment contract and ID were issued to
her. However, in December 2008, she was compelled by Teves to sign an end-of-
contract letter by reason of a criminal complaint for sexual harassment she filed on
December 3, 2008 against Mexicali's operations manager, John Pontero (Pontero), for
the sexual advances made against her during Pontero's visits at Alabang branch.8
When she refused to sign the end-of-contract letter, Mexicali's administrative officer,
Ding Luna (Luna), on December 15, 2008, personally went to the branch and caused
the signing of the same. Upon her vehement refusal to sign, she was informed by
Luna that it was her last day of work.
Respondents, however, denied responsibility over petitioner's alleged dismissal. They

averred that petitioner has resigned from Mexicali in October 2008 and hence, was no
longer Mexicali's employee at the time of her dismissal but rather an employee of
Calexico, a franchisee of Mexicali located in Alabang Town Center which is a separate
and distinct corporation.
In her reply, petitioner admitted having resigned from Mexicali but averred that her
resignation was a condition for her promotion as store manager at Mexicali's Alabang
Town Center branch. She asserted that despite her resignation, she remained to be
an employee of Mexicali because Mexicali was the one who engaged her, dismissed
her and controlled the performance of her work as store manager in the newly
opened branch.
Proceedings before the Labor Arbiter
In a Decision9 dated August 27, 2009, the Labor Arbiter declared petitioner to have
been illegally dismissed by respondents. By piercing the veil of corporate fiction, the
Ads by
Labor Arbiter ruled that Mexicali and Calexico are one and the same with interlocking
Send
board of feedback WhyLabor
directors. The this ad?
Arbiter sustained petitioner's claim that she is an
employee of Mexicali as she was hired at Calexico by Mexicali's corporate officers and
also dismissed by them and hence, held Mexicali responsible for petitioner's
dismissal. The Labor Arbiter then observed that petitioner was only forced to resign
as a condition for her promotion, thus, cannot be utilized by Mexicali as a valid
defense. As the severance from employment was attended by fraud, petitioner was
awarded moral and exemplary damages. The dispositive portion of the Decision
reads:
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
WHEREFORE, premises considered, respondents are hereby declared

guilty of illegal dismissal and ORDERED to reinstate complainant to her
former position even pending appeal. All the respondents are hereby
jointly and severally ordered to pay complainant the following:
1. Full backwages from date of dismissal to date of actual

reinstatement which to date amounts to P139,013.94.
2. Moral damages in the sum of P100,000.00.
3. Exemplary damages in the sum of P50,000.00.
SO ORDERED.10
ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
Proceedings before the National Labor Relations Commission
On October 26, 2009, respondents filed an Appeal Memorandum with Prayer for
Injunction11 with the NLRC, averring that the Labor Arbiter erred in: (1) holding them
liable for the acts of Calexico, which is a separate entity created with a different
purpose, principal office, directors/incorporators, properties, management and
business plans from Mexicali as evidenced by their respective Articles of Incorporation
and By-Laws;12 (2) ruling that petitioner's resignation was not voluntary; and, (3)
ruling that there is an employer-employee relationship between petitioner and
Mexicali on the basis of petitioner's mere allegation that she was hired and dismissed
by Mexicali's officers.
In a Resolution13 dated November 25, 2009, the NLRC dismissed the appeal for
having been filed beyond the 10-day reglementary period to appeal. The NLRC rioted
that the Appeal Memorandum was filed only on October 26, 2009 despite
respondents' receipt of the Labor Arbiter's Decision on October 13, 2009 (as stated in
the Appeal Memorandum).
Respondents filed a Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for Issuance of
TRO/Injunction14 explaining that the Appeal Memorandum filed by them contained a

typographical error as to the date of actual receipt of the Labor Arbiter's Decision;
that while a copy of the said decision was received by them on October 13, 2009, the
same was only received by their counsel of record on October 15, 200915 which is the
reckoning date of the 10-day reglementary period within which to appeal.
In a Resolution16 dated May 28, 2010, the NLRC granted respondents' motion and
reinstated the appeal. The NLRC ruled that pursuant to its Rules of Procedure, the
date to reckon the 10-day reglementary period should be the date when the counsel
actually received the copy of the Labor Arbiter's Decision and that respondents'
appeal was filed on time.
The NLRC likewise ruled on the merits of the appeal. It partly granted it by sustaining
respondents' contention that Mexicali and Calexico are separate and distinct entities,
Calexico being the true employer of petitioner at the time of her dismissal. Contrary
Ads by
to the findings of the Labor Arbiter, petitioner voluntarily resigned from Mexicali to
Sendto
transfer feedback
Calexico inWhy this ad? of a higher pay and upon doing so severed her
consideration
employment ties with Mexicali. The NLRC, nevertheless, ordered Mexicali, being the
employer of Teves and Luna who caused petitioner's termination from her
employment with Calexico, to reinstate petitioner to her job at Calexico but without
paying her any backwages. The dispositive portion of the NLRC Resolution reads:
chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary
WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Commission GRANTS the Motion,

for Reconsideration of its 25 November 2009 Resolution which dismissed
the appeal for having been filed out of time.
This Commission also PARTLY GRANTS the appeal of respondents-

appellants and the Decision of the Labor Arbiter dated 27 August 2009 is
MODIFIED ordering Mexicali Food Corporation to cause the reinstatement
of complainant-appellee to his former position as store manager at its
franchisee Calexico Food Corporation within ten (10) days from receipt of
this Resolution without backwages.
SO ORDERED.17
ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
Proceedings before the Court of Appeals
Petitioner sought recourse with the CA via Petition for Certiorari.18 It was petitioner's
contention that the NLRC erred in reinstating respondents' appeal despite being filed
beyond the reglementary period; in resolving the issue of dismissal considering that
only the timeliness of the appeal was the sole issue raised in respondents' motion for
reconsideration; and in holding that she was not illegally dismissed but voluntarily
resigned from Mexicali.
In a Decision19 dated August 29, 2012, the CA dismissed the Petition for Certiorari
and affirmed the May 28, 2010 Resolution of the NLRC. The CA ruled that the NLRC
correctly reinstated respondents' appeal and properly resolved the issues raised
therein to conform with the well-settled principle of expeditious administration of
justice. The CA also agreed with the NLRC that there was no illegal dismissal since
petitioner voluntarily tendered her resignation to assume a position in Calexico.
Petitioner moved for reconsideration which was denied by the CA in its Resolution20
of December 14, 2012.
Hence, this Petition.
Issues
WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN SUSTAINING THE

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION'S DECISION REINSTATING
THE RESPONDENTS' APPEAL DESPITE BEING FILED OUT OF TIME.
II

WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN SUSTAINING THE

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION'S RESOLUTION (TO THE
RESPONDENTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION) PARTLY GRANTING
THE RESPONDENTS' APPEAL (REGARDING THE ISSUE OF ILLEGAL
DISMISSAL) DESPITE BEING A NON-ISSUE IN THEIR MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION.
Ads by

Send feedback Why this ad? III

WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS COMMITTED A REVERSIBLE ERROR IN

HOLDING THAT THERE WAS NO ILLEGAL DISMISSAL.
IV

HOLDING THAT THE PETITIONER RESIGNED FROM HER EMPLOYMENT
WITH THE RESPONDENTS.

FAILING TO RULE ON THE ISSUE OF WHETHER OR NOT THE PETITIONER
IS ENTITLED TO THE AWARD OF MORAL AND EXEMPLARY DAMAGES
RENDERED BY THE LABOR ARBITER, DESPITE BEING RAISED IN THE
PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR CERTIORARI.21 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary
Petitioner maintains that the CA gravely erred in affirming the NLRC's reinstatement
of respondents' appeal despite being filed out of time and the NLRC's ruling that
there was no illegal dismissal, arguing that it is a non-issue in respondents' motion
for reconsideration and there was absence of any valid cause for terminating her
employment with Mexicali.
Our Ruling
The Petition has no merit.
The appeal before the NLRC was filed on time.
Section 6, Rule III of the 2005 Revised Rules of Procedure of the NLRC (2005 NLRC
Rules) expressly mandates that "(f)or purposes of appeal, the period shall be counted
from receipt of such decisions, resolutions, or orders by the counsel or representative
of record." This procedure is in line with the established rule that if a party has
appeared by counsel, service upon him shall be made upon his counsel.22 "The
purpose of the rule is to maintain a uniform procedure calculated to place in
competent hands the prosecution of a party's case."23 Thus, Section 9, Rule III of the
NLRC Rules provides that "(a)ttorneys and other representatives of parties shall have
authority to bind their clients in all matters of procedure x x x."
Accordingly, the 10-day period for filing an appeal with the NLRC should be counted
from the receipt by respondents' counsel of a copy of the Labor Arbiter's Decision on
October 15, 2009. Petitioner's contention that the reckoning period should be the
date respondents actually received the Decision on October 13, 2009 is bereft of any
legal basis. As mentioned, when a party to a suit appears by counsel, service of every

judgment and all orders of the court must be sent to the counsel. Notice to counsel is

an effective notice to the client, while notice to the client and not his counsel is not
June-2016 Jurisprudence
notice in law.24 Therefore, receipt of notice by the counsel of record is the reckoning

point of the reglementary period.25 From the receipt of the Labor Arbiter's Decision

by respondent's counsel on October 15, 2009, the 10th day falls on October 25, 2009
G.R. No. 175085, June 01,
which is a Sunday, hence, Monday, October 26, 2009, is the last day to file the
2016 - TAN SIOK1 KUAN AND
appeal. Consequently, respondents' appeal was timely filed.
PUTE CHING, Petitioners, v.

FELICISIMO "BOY" HO, RODOLFO
The NLRC has authority to resolve the appeal on its merits despite being a non-issue
C. RETURTA, VICENTE M. SALAS,
in respondents' motion for reconsideration.
AND LOLITA MALONZO,
Ads by
Respondents. Petitioner still argues that the NLRC gravely abused its discretion in ruling on the

Send
merits of feedback Why this
the case despite ad?
being a non-issue in the motion for reconsideration, She
G.R. No. 211672, June 14, contends that in resolving the issue of the legality or illegality of her dismissal, which
2016 - PEOPLE OF THE was not raised in respondents' motion for reconsideration, the NLRC deprived her of
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. the opportunity to properly refute or oppose respondents' evidence thereby violating
JOHN HAPPY DOMINGO Y CARAG, her right to due process.
Accused-Appellant.

The contention is untenable. The essence of procedural due process is that a party to
G.R. No. 204056, June 01, a case must be given sufficient opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.26
2016 - GIL MACALINO, JR., Indeed, petitioner had this opportunity to present her own case and submit evidence
TERESITA MACALINO, ELPIDIO to support her allegations. She has submitted her position paper with supporting
MACALINO, PILAR MACALINO, documents as well as reply to respondents' position paper to refute respondents'
GILBERTO MACALINO, evidence before the Labor Arbiter.
HERMILINA MACALINO,
EMMANUEL MACALINO, EDELINA On the basis of these documents submitted by the parties, the NLRC then resolved
MACALINO, EDUARDO the merits of respondents' appeal. The Court finds that the NLRC has authority to rely
MACALINO, LEONARDO on the available evidence obtaining in the records. Article 221 of the Labor Code
MACALINO, EDLLANE** allows the NLRC to decide the case on the basis of the position papers and other
MACALINO, APOLLO MACALINO, documents submitted by the parties without resorting to the technical rules of
MA. FE MACALINO, AND GILDA
evidence observed in the regular courts of justice.27 After all, the NLRC is not bound
MACALINO, Petitioners, v.
by the technical niceties of law and procedure and the rules obtaining in the courts of
ARTEMIO PIS-AN, Respondent.
law.28 In any event, the NLRC is mandated to use every and all reasonable means to

ascertain the facts in each case speedily and objectively, without regard to
G.R. No. 211290, June 01,
technicalities of law or procedure, all in the interest of due process.29
2016 - OMBUDSMAN-MINDANAO,

Petitioner, v. LILING LANTO

Petitioner voluntarily resigned from Mexicali. No employer-employee relationship
IBRAHIM, PROJECT MANAGER,
between petitioner and Mexicali at the time of alleged dismissal.
NATIONAL IRRIGATION

ADMINISTRATION, NIA-PIO,
Ruling on the substantive matters, the Court finds that there exists no employer-
LANAO DEL NORTE, Respondent.
employee relationship between petitioner and respondents as to hold the latter liable

for illegal dismissal.
G.R. No. 205061, June 08,

2016 - EMERTIA G. MALIXI,

The CA, affirming the NLRC, found that petitioner voluntarily resigned from Mexicali.
Petitioner, v. MEXICALI
Petitioner, however, claims that she was induced into resigning considering the higher
PHILIPPINES AND/OR
position and attractive salary package; moreover, she avers that her resignation
FRANCESCA MABANTA,
cannot effectively sever her employment ties with Mexicali.
Respondents.

We disagree. "Resignation is the voluntary act of an employee who is in a situation

G.R. No. 208137, June 08,
where one believes that personal reasons cannot be sacrificed in favor of the
2016 - MARIA CECILIA OEBANDA,
exigency of the service, and one has no other choice but to dissociate oneself from
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND/OR
employment. It is a formal pronouncement or relinquishment of an office, with the
THE OCCUPANTS AND
intention of relinquishing the office accompanied by the act of relinquishment. As the
EMPLOYEES OF VISAYAN FORUM
intent to relinquish must concur with the overt act of relinquishment, the acts of the
FOUNDATION, INC., Petitioners,
employee before and after the alleged resignation must be considered in determining
v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent. whether he or she, in fact, intended to sever his or her employment."30 Here,

petitioner tendered her resignation letter preparatory to her transfer to Calexico for a
G.R. No. 203750, June 06, higher position and pay. In the said letter, she expressed her gratitude and
2016 - JORGE B. NAVARRA, appreciation for the two months of her employment with Mexicali and intimated that
Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE she regrets having to leave the company. Clearly, expressions of gratitude and
PHILIPPINES, HONGKONG AND appreciation as well as manifestation of regret in leaving the company negates the
SHANGHAI BANKING notion that she was forced and coerced to resign. In the same vein, an inducement
CORPORATION, Respondents. for a higher position and salary cannot defeat the voluntariness of her actions. It

should be emphasized that petitioner had an option to decline the offer for her
G.R. No. 209146, June 08, transfer, however, she opted to resign on account of a promotion and increased pay.
2016 - PROVINCE OF ANTIQUE "In termination cases, the employee is not afforded any option; the employee is
AND MUNICIPALITY OF CALUYA, dismissed and his only recourse is to institute a complaint for illegal dismissal against
Petitioners, v. HON. RECTO A. his employer x x x."31 Clearly, this does not hold true for petitioner in the instant
Ads by
CALABOCAL, JUDGE-DESIGNATE, case. Further, as aptly observed by the CA, petitioner is a managerial employee, who,
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, Send feedback Why this ad?
by her educational background could not have been coerced, forced or induced into
BRANCH 43, ROXAS, ORIENTAL resigning from her work.
MINDORO, PROVINCE OF
ORIENTAL MINDORO, AND Upon petitioner's resignation, petitioner ceased to be an employee of Mexicali and
MUNICIPALITY OF BULALACAO, chose to be employed at Calexico. Petitioner, however, claims that Mexicali and
Respondents. Calexico are one and the same and that Mexicali was still her employer upon her

transfer to Calexico since she was hired and dismissed by Mexicali's officers and that
G.R. No. 200180, June 06, Mexicali exercised the power of control over her work performance.
2016 - BENJAMIN H. CABAÑEZ,
Petitioner, v. MARIE JOSEPHINE We rule otherwise. The Labor Arbiter's finding that the two corporations are one and
CORDERO SOLANO A.K.A. MA. the same with interlocking board of directors has no factual basis. It is basic that "a
JOSEPHINE S. CABAÑEZ, corporation is an artificial being invested with a personality separate and distinct from
Respondent. those of the stockholders and from other corporations to which it may be connected

or related."32 Clear and convincing evidence is needed to warrant the application of

G.R. No. 207811, June 01,
the doctrine of piercing the veil of corporate fiction,33 In our view, the Labor Arbiter
2016 - PEOPLE OF THE
failed to provide a clear justification for the application of the doctrine. The Articles of
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.
Incorporation and By-Laws of both corporations show that they have distinct business
DELIA MOLINA Y CABRAL,
locations and distinct business purposes. It can also be gleaned therein that they
Accused-Appellants.
have a different set of incorporators or directors since only two out of the five

directors of Mexicali are also directors of Calexico. At any rate, the Court has ruled
G.R. No. 212493, June 01,
that the existence of interlocking directors, corporate officers and shareholders is not
2016 - GABRIEL YAP, SR. DULY
enough justification to disregard the separate corporate personalities.34 To pierce the
REPRESENTED BY GILBERT YAP
veil of corporate fiction, there should be clear and convincing proof that fraud,
AND ALSO IN HIS PERSONAL
CAPACITY, GABRIEL YAP, JR., AND illegality or inequity has been committed against third persons.35 For while
HYMAN YAP, Petitioners, v. respondents' act of not issuing employment contract and ID may be an indication of
LETECIA SIAO, LYNEL SIAO, the proof required, however, this, by itself, is not sufficient evidence to pierce the
JANELYN SIAO, ELEANOR FAYE corporate veil between Mexicali and Calexico.
SIAO, SHELETT SIAO AND
HONEYLET SIAO, Respondents.; More importantly, there was no existing employer-employee relationship between
G.R. No. 212504 - CEBU SOUTH petitioner and Mexicali. To prove petitioner's claim of an employer-employee
MEMORIAL GARDEN, INC., relationship, the following should be established by competent evidence: "(1) the
Petitioner, v. LETECIA SIAO, selection and engagement of the employee; (2) the payment of wages; (3) the power
LYNEL SIAO, JANELYN SIAO, of dismissal; and (4) the power of control over the employee's conduct."36 "Although
ELEANOR FAYE SIAO, SHELETT no particular form of evidence is required to prove the existence of the relationship,
SIAO AND HONEYLET SIAO, and any competent and relevant evidence to prove the relationship may be admitted,
Respondents. a finding mat the relationship exists must nonetheless rest on substantial evidence,

which is that amount of relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as
G.R. No. 182537, June 01, adequate to justify a conclusion."37 We find that petitioner failed to establish her
2016 - MACTAN-CEBU claim based on the aforementioned criteria. As to petitioner's allegation that it was
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Teves who selected and hired her as store manager of Calexico and likewise, together
AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. with Luna, initiated her dismissal, suffice it to state that bare allegations,
RICHARD E. UNCHUAN,
unsubstantiated by evidence, are not equivalent to proof.38 Nevertheless, Teves
Respondent.
merely informed petitioner of the management's intention to transfer her and

thereafter advised her to execute a resignation letter, to which she complied.

G.R. No. 187462, June 01,
Nowhere was there any allegation or proof that Teves was the one who directly hired
2016 - RAQUEL G. KHO,
her as store manager of Calexico. Also, Teves and Luna merely initiated petitioner's
Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF THE
dismissal. The end-of-contract purportedly signed by Luna to effectuate her
PHILIPPINES AND VERONICA B.
termination was not presented. Again, mere allegation is not synonymous with proof
KHO, Respondents.
No substantial evidence was adduced to show that respondents had the power to

wield petitioner's termination from employment. Anent the element of control,

G.R. No. 206419, June 01,
petitioner failed to cite a single instance to prove that she was subject to the control
2016 - PEOPLE OF THE of respondents insofar as the manner in which she should perform her work as store
manager. The bare assertion that she was required to work from Friday through
RUBEN DELA ROSA, Accused-
Wednesday is not enough indication that the performance of her job was subject to
Appellant.
the control of respondents. On the other hand, the payslips39 presented by petitioner

reveal that she received her salary from Calexico and no longer from Mexicali starting
Ads by
G.R. No. 202047, June 08, the month of October 2008.
2016 - LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT

AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. NOEL B. This Court is, therefore, convinced that petitioner is no longer an employee of
PILI, MEDEL I. LIRIO, RODERICK respondents considering her resignation. In the absence of an employer-employee
B. JAMON, VICTORINO A. relationship between petitioner and respondents, petitioner cannot successfully claim
MACHICA, RONNIE C. VALORIA, that she was dismissed, much more illegally dismissed, by the latter. The dismissal of
VIRGILIO M. FLORES, RENATO C. petitioner's complaint against respondents is, therefore, proper.
PALMA, ANGELITO V. GUINTO,
RAMIRO M. FELICIANO, ENRIQUE In the Resolution dated May 28, 2010, however, the NLRC ordered respondents to
L. CIUBAL, ELMER P. TABIGAN, reinstate petitioner as store manager at Calexico but without the payment of
VENANCIO T. MADRIA, MAXIMO backwages, ratiocinating that Mexicali's officers (Teves and Luna) wrongly arrogated
M. VITANGCOL, RODOLFO L. upon themselves the power to dismiss petitioner. We view that the NLRC erred in this
PAGUIO, ARNEL F. MAGSALIN, respect. It is to be noted that Calexico is not a party to this case."It is well-settled
JULIANA N. DOLOR, NOEL C. that no man shall be affected by any proceeding to which he is a stranger, and
CRUZ, SANDY C. JARILLA, strangers to a case are not bound by a judgment rendered by the court."40 "Due
BERTITO I. SERVIDAD, ALAN R. process requires that a court decision can only bind a party to the litigation and not
CORPUZ, ROBERT D. PABLO,
against one who did not have his day in court."41 An adjudication in favour of or
ROBERT H. MONTEREY, HENRY L.
against Calexico, a stranger to this case, is hence void.
chanrobleslaw
LIAO, ROLANDO C. CEBANICO,

VELIENTE S. FANTASTICO, MA.

WHEREFORE, the Petition is DENIED. The August 29, 2012 Decision and December
EMILIAN S. CRUZ, EDGARDO G.
14, 2012 Resolution of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 115413 affirming the
GAMBAYAN, GERARDO M.
May 28, 2010 Resolution of the National Labor Relations Commission are AFFIRMED
RUMBAWA, DANTE D. PALOMARA,
with MODIFICATION that the order for respondent Mexicali Food Corporation to
MA. TERESA B. DE LOS REYES,
cause the reinstatement of petitioner Emerita G. Malixi to her former position as store
JOSE ALLAN S. PACIFICO,
manager at Calexico Food Corporation without backwages is DELETED. The
RESTITUTO R. MALAPO, EARL G.
Complaint against respondents Mexicali Philippines and/or Francesca Mabanta is
PONGCO, LUCILO C. DEL MONTE,
DISMISSED.
RUEL F. MAGBALANA, MARLYN V.

VILLANUEVA, JUDITH C. BANEZ,

SO ORDERED.
GERMAN N. DE LUNA, FREDERICK

B. DEL CORRO, CLODUALDO B.

Carpio,*(Chairperson), Mendoza, and Leonen, JJ., concur.
PASIOLAN, ROLANDO I.
Brion, J., on official leave.
NAVARRO, AND PACIANO J.

chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary
VILLANUEVA,*, Respondents.
Endnotes:
G.R. No. 211026, June 27,
* Per Special Order No 2353 dated June 2, 2016.
RENATO B. SUEDAD, Accused-
1Rollo, pp. 10-29.
Appellant.

G.R. No. 204441, June 08, 2 CA rollo, pp. 191-201; penned by Associate Justice Amelita G. Tolentino
2016 - PEOPLE OF THE and concurred in by Associate Justices Ramon R. Garcia and Socorro B.
PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. Inting.
MICHAEL KURT JOHN BULAWAN Y
ANDALES, Respondent. 3 Id. at 131-145; penned by Commissioner Pablo C. Espiritu, Jr. and

concurred in by Presiding Commissioner Alex A. Lopez and Commissioner
G.R. No. 201834, June 01, Gregorio O. Bilog, III.
2016 - ANDRES L. DIZON,
Petitioner, v. NAESS SHIPPING 4 Id. at 226-227.
PHILIPPINES, INC. AND DOLE UK

(LTD.), Respondents.
5 Id. at 202-209.
G.R. No. 196962, June 08,

6 Id. at 20-21.

7 Id. at 41.
JOAN SONJACO Y STA. ANA,
Ads by
Accused-Appellant. 8 See Malixi's Complaint Affidavit, id. at 34-35.

Send

feedback Why this ad?

G.R. No. 191936, June 01, 9 Id. at 51 -55; penned by Labor Arbiter Ariel Cadiente-Santos.
2016 - VIRGINIA D. CALIMAG,

Petitioner, v. HEIRS OF
10 Id. at 54-55.
SILVESTRA N. MACAPAZ,

REPRESENTED BY ANASTACIO P.
11 Id. at 57-66.
MACAPAZ, JR., Respondents.

12 Mexicali's Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws, id. at 68-93;

G.R. No. 193374, June 08,
2016 - HEIRS OF THE LATE Calexico's Articles of Incorporation and By-laws, id. at 94-112.
GERRY* ECARMA, NAMELY:
13 Id. at 114-116.
AVELINA SUIZA-ECARMA,
DENNIS ECARMA, JERRY LYN
ECARMA PENA, ANTONIO 14 Id. at 117-119.
ECARMA AND NATALIA ECARMA
SANGALANG, Petitioners, v. 15 See Postmaster's Certification dated December 14, 2009, id. at 120.
COURT OF APPEALS AND RENATO

A. ECARMA, Respondents. 16 Id. at 131-145.
G.R. No. 175592, June 14,

17 Id. at 144.

18 Id. at 2-19.
EDISON C. MAGBITANG,
Accused-Appellant.
19 Id. at 191-201.
G.R. No. 174838, June 01,
2016 - STRONGHOLD 20 Id. at 226-227.
INSURANCE CO., INC., Petitioner,
v. PAMANA ISLAND RESORT 21Rollo, pp. 16-17.
HOTEL AND MARINA CLUB, INC.,
Respondent. 22 Rules of Court, Rule 13, Sec. 2.
G.R. No. 185331, June 08,

23Mancenido v. Court of Appeals, 386 Phil. 627, 636 (2000).
2016 - SPOUSES ABELARDO

VALARAO AND FRANCISCA

24Ramos v. Spouses Lim, 497 Phil. 560, 564-565 (2005).
VALARAO, Petitioners, v. MSC

cralawred
AND COMPANY, Respondent.

25Waterfront Cebu City Casino Hotel, Inc. v. Ledesma, G.R. No. 197556,
G.R. No. 205097, June 08, March 25, 2015.
2016 - CORAZON D. ISON,
Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE 26Robusta Agro Marine Products, Inc. v. Gorombalem, 256 Phil. 545, 550
PHILIPPINES, Respondent. (1989).
cralawred
G.R. No. 211212, June 08,

27Suarez v. National Labor Relations Commission, 355 Phil. 236, 243
2016 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA
(1998) citing Manila Doctors Hospital v. National Labor Relations
(PHILIPPINES), INC., Petitioner, v.
Commission, G.R. No. 64897, February 28, 1985, 235 SCRA 262, 265-
MA. DAISY'S. SIBYA, JESUS
267.
MANUEL S. SIBYA III, JAIME LUIS

S. SIBYA, AND THE ESTATE OF

28Bantolino v. Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils., Inc., 451 Phil. 839, 846 (2003).
THE DECEASED ATTY. JESUS

SIBYA, JR., Respondents.
29 The 2005 Revised Rules of Procedure of the National Labor Relations

G.R. No. 208646, June 15, Commission, Rule VII, Section 10.
PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 30Bilbao v. Saudi Arabian Airlines, 678 Phil. 793, 802 (2011).
LORETO SONIDO Y CORONEL, 31Samaniego v. National Labor Relations Commission, G.R. No. 93059,
Ads by
Accused-Appellant. June 3, 1991, 198 SCRA 111, 118.

Send

feedback Why this ad?

G.R. No. 207517, June 01, 32Kukan International Corporation v. Hon. Judge Reyes, 646 Phil. 210,
232 (2010).
PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. RAUL

AMARO Y CATUBAY ALIAS

33Manila Hotel Corp. v. National Labor Relations Commission, 397 Phil. 1,
"LALAKS," Appellant.
19 (2000).
G.R. No. 200081, June 08,

34Velarde v. Lopez, Inc., 464 Phil. 525, 538 (2004).

35Philippine National Bank v. Hydro Resources Contractors Corporation,
EDGARDO T. CRUZ, Accused-
Appellant. 706 Phil. 297, 308-309 (2013).
36McBurnie v. Ganzon, G.R. Nos. 178034 & 178117, 186984-85, October

G.R. No. 194605, June 14,
2016 - PEOPLE OF THE 17, 2013, 707 SCRA 646, 690.
MARIANO OANDASAN, JR., 37Legend Hotel (Manila), v. Realuyo, 691 Phil. 226, 236-237 (2012).
Accused-Appellant.

38Martin v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 82248, January 30, 1992, 205
G.R. No. 214440, June 15, SCRA 591, 597.

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. 39 CA rollo, p. 31.
cralawred
ALEX MENDEZ RAFOLS, Accused-

Appellant.
40Atilano II v. Judge Asaali, 694 Phil. 488, 495 (2012).
G.R. No. 217732, June 15,
41Fermin v. Hon. Judge Esteves, 573 Phil. 12, 18 (2008).

2016 - EMILIO S. AGCOLICOL,
JR., Petitioner, v. JERWIN

CASIÑO, Respondent.

G.R. No. 172352, June 08,

2016 - LAND BANK OF THE Back to Home | Back to Main
PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v.
ALFREDO HABABAG, SR.,
SUBSTITUTED BY HIS WIFE,
CONSOLACION, AND CHILDREN,
NAMELY: MANUEL, SALVADOR,
WILSON, JIMMY, ALFREDO, JR.,
AND JUDITH, ALL SURNAMED
HABABAG, Respondents.; G.R.
NOS. 172387-88 - ALFREDO
HABABAG, SR., SUBSTITUTED BY
HIS WIFE, CONSOLACION, AND
CHILDREN, NAMELY: MANUEL,
SALVADOR, WILSON, JIMMY,
ALFREDO, JR., AND JUDITH, ALL
SURNAMED HABABAG,
Petitioners, v. LAND BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINES AND THE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN
REFORM, Respondent.

G.R. No. 215994, June 06,

2016 - OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN AND FIELD
INVESTIGATION OFFICE,
Petitioner, v. ROLANDO B.
Ads by
FALLER, Respondent.

A.C. No. 11069, June 08, 2016
- RONALDO C. FACTURAN,
Complainant, v. PROSECUTOR
ALFREDO L. BARCELONA, JR.,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 208475, June 08,

MANUEL REBANUEL Y NADERA,
Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 168749, June 06,

2016 - SUGARSTEEL
INDUSTRIAL, INC. AND MR. BEN
YAPJOCO, Petitioners, v. VICTOR
ALBINA, VICENTE UY AND ALEX
VELASQUEZ, Respondents.

G.R. No. 160071, June 06,

2016 - ANDREW D. FYFE,
RICHARD T. NUTTALL, AND
RICHARD J. WALD, Petitioners, v.
PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC.,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 217943, June 06,

2016 - J. MELLIZA ESTATE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR,
ATTY. RAFAEL S. VILLANUEVA,
Petitioner, v. ROSENDO SIMOY,
GREGORIO SIMOY AND CONSEJO
SIMOY, Respondents.

G. R. No. 185169, June 15,

2016 - HEIRS OF CATALINO
DACANAY, HIS WIFE ERLINDA
DACANAY, THEIR CHILDREN
AURORA D. CONSTANTINO AND
REYNALDO DACANAY; LOLITA
DACANAY VDA. DE PARASO;
HEIRS OF SOLEDAD APOSTOL,
NAMELY: HER HUSBAND
LEONARDO CAGUIOA, THEIR
CHILDREN AMALIA, DANILO,
RONALD, MARLENE, ROBERT,
ROLDAN, THELMA AND TERESA,
ALL SURNAMED CAGUIOA,
Petitioners, v. JUAN SIAPNO, JR.,
MARIO RILLON, SPOUSES JOSE
TAN AND LETICIA DY TAN,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 201016, June 22,

Ads by
2016 - LEONCIA A. YUMANG,
Petitioner, v. RADIO PHILIPPINES Send feedback Why this ad?
NETWORK, INC. (RPN 9), MIA A.
CONCIO, LEONOR C. LINAO, IDA
BARRAMEDA AND LOURDES O.
ANGELES, Respondents.

G.R. No. 189401, June 15,

2016 - VIL-REY PLANNERS AND
BUILDERS, Petitioners, v.
LEXBER, INC., Respondent.; G.R.
NO. 189447 - LEXBER, INC.,
Petitioner, v. STRONGHOLD
INSURANCE COMPANY, INC.,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 203057, June 06,

2016 - BUREAU OF INTERNAL
REVENUE AS REPRESENTED BY
THE COMMISSIONER OF
INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v.
MANILA HOME TEXTILE, INC,
THELMA LEE AND SAMUEL LE,E,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 204769, June 06,

2016 - MAGSAYSAY MARITIME
CORP., CSCS BMTERNATIONAL NV
AND/OR MARLON* RONO,
Petitioners, v. RODEL A. CRUZ,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 203336, June 06,

2016 - SPOUSES GERARDO AND
CORAZON TRINIDAD, Petitioners,
v. FAMA REALTY, INC. AND FELIX
ASSAD, Respondents.

G.R. No. 208524, June 01,

BERNARDINO PERALTAJ MORILLO
AND MICHAEL AMBAS Y REYES,
Accused, BERNARDINO PERALTA
Y MORILLO, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 209038, June 08,

RONALD BACALAN GABUYA AND
RYANNEAL MENESES GIRON,
Accused-Appellants.

G.R. No. 197393, June 15,

2016 - PHILIPPINE SAVINGS
BANK, Petitioner, v. MANUEL P.
BARRERA, Respondent.
Ads by
A.C. No. 11246, June 14, 2016
- ARNOLD PACAO, Complainant, Send feedback Why this ad?
v. ATTY. SINAMAR LIMOS,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 181353, June 06,

2016 - HGL DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY
ITS PRESIDENT, HENRY G. LIM,
Petitioner, v. HON. RAFAEL O.
PENUELA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS
ACTING PRESIDING JUDGE OF
THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT,
6TH JUDICIAL REGION, BRANCH
13, CULASI, ANTIQUE AND
SEMIRARA COAL CORPORATION
(NOW SEMIRARA MINING
CORPORATION), Respondents.

G.R. No. 217575, June 15,

2016 - SOUTH COTABATO
COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION AND GAUVAIN J.
BENZONAN, Petitioners, v. HON.
PATRICIA STO. TOMAS,
SECRETARY OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ROLANDO
FABRIGAR, MERLYN VELARDE,
VINCE LAMBOC, FELIPE
GALINDO, LEONARDO MIGUEL,
JULIUS RUBIN, EDEL RODEROS,
MERLYN COLIAO, AND EDGAR
JOPSON, Respondents.

G.R. No. 213919, June 15,

PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v.
VIRGILIO A. QUIM, Appellant.

G.R. No. 203152, June 20,

2016 - GEORGIA ROYO
ADLAWAN, IN HER OWN BEHALF
AND AS SURVIVING SPOUSE OF
ALFONSO V. ADLAWAN, Petitioner,
v. NICETAS I. JOAQUINO,
FLORENCIA J. SON, EUSTOLIA J.
MATA, BEATRIZ J. SATIRA,
TERESA J. BERMEJO, CORAZON J.
COGINA, MARIA J. NOVAL AND
VISITACION J. DELA TORRE,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 193075, June 20,

2016 - EMMANUEL REYES, SR.
AND MUTYA M. REYES,
Petitioners, v. HEIRS OF
DEOGRACIAS FORLALES,
NAMELY: NAPOLEON FORLALES,

Ads by
LITA HELEN FORLALES-
FRADEJAS, JAIME FORLALES, JR., Send feedback Why this ad?
JULIUS FORLALES FORTUNA,
HORACE FORLALES, GALAHAD
FORLALES, JR., INDEPENDENCE
FORLALES-FETALVERO, MELITON
FORLALES, JR., MILAGROS V.
FORLALES AND MERCEDES
FORLALES-BAUTISTA,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 208146, June 08,

2016 - VIRGINIA DIO, Petitioner,
v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES
AND TIMOTHY DESMOND,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 208586, June 22,

2016 - HEIRS OF DATU
MAMALINDING MAGAYOONG,
REPRESENTED BY DR. MAIMONA
MAGAYOONG-PANGARUNGAN
WITH HER SPOUSE DATU SA
MARAWI RASID PANGARUNGAN,
AND DR. ANISHA* MAGAYOONG-
MACABATO WITH HER SPOUSE
DATU KHALIQUZZAMAN
MACABATO, Petitioners, v. HEIRS
OF CATAMANAN MAMA,
REPRESENTED BY HASAN MAMA,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 189516, June 08,

2016 - EDNA MABUGAY-OTAMIAS,
JEFFREN M. OTAMIAS AND
MINOR JEMWEL M. OTAMIAS,
REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER
EDNA MABUGAY-OTAMIAS,
Petitioners, v. REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY
COL. VIRGILIO O. DOMINGO, IN
HIS CAPACITY AS THE
COMMANDING OFFICER OF THE
PENSION AND GRATUITY
MANAGEMENT CENTER (PGMC)
OF THE ARMED FORCES OF THE
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.

G.R. No. 214122, June 08,

2016 - AUTOZENTRUM ALABANG,
INC., Petitioner, v. SPOUSES
MIAMAR A. BERNARDO AND
GENARO F. BERNARDO, JR.,
DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND
INDUSTRY, ASIAN CARMAKERS
CORPORATION, AND BAYERISHE
MOTOREN WERKE (BMW) A.G.,

Ads by
Respondents.

G.R. No. 195382, June 15,
2016 - ORION WATER DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL
MANAGER, CRISPIN Q. TRIA, ET
AL., Petitioner, v. THE
GOVERNMENT SERVICE
INSURANCE SYSTEM (GSIS),
Respondent.

G.R. No. 201584, June 15,

APOLONIO "TOTONG" AVILA Y
ALECANTE, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 210936, June 28,

2016 - TEODORO B. CRUZ, JR.,
MELCHOR M. ALONZO, AND
WILFREDO P. ALDAY, Petitioners,
v. COMMISSION ON AUDIT,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 196329, June 01,

2016 - PABLO B. ROMAN, JR.,
AND ATTY. MATIAS V. DEFENSOR,
AS OFFICERS OF THE CAPITOL
HILLS GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB,
INC., Petitioners, v. SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
ATTY. FRANKLIN I. CUETO, ATTY.
EMMANUEL Y. ARTIZA AND
MANUEL C. BALDEO, AS
MEMBERS OF THE MANAGEMENT
COMMITTEE; JUSTINA F.
CALLANGAN, AS DIRECTOR OF
THE CORPORATION FINANCE
DEPARTMENT; ATTY. NARCISO T.
ATIENZA, EUSEBIO A. ABAQUIN,
ATTY. CLODUALDO C. DE JESUS,
SR., ATTY. CLODUALDO ANTONIO
R. DE JESUS, JR., ATTY. IRENEO
T. AGUIRRE, JR., SUNDAY O.
PINEDA, PORFIRIO M. FLORES,
AND ATTY. ZOSIMO PADRO, JR.,
Respondents.

A.C. No. 7330, June 14, 2016

- JUDGE GREGORIO D.
PANTANOSAS, JR., Complainant,
v. ATTY. ELLY L. PAMATONG,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 211604, June 08,

DARYL POLONIO Y TUANGCAY,

Ads by
Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 203932, June 08,
2016 - PHILIPPINE AIRLINES,
INC., Petitioner, v. ENRIQUE
LIGAN, EDUARDO MAGDARAOG,
JOLITO OLIVEROS, RICHARD
GONCER, EMELITO SOCO,
VIRGILIO P. CAMPOS, JR.,
LORENZO BUTANAS, RAMEL
BERNARDES, NELSON M. DULCE,
CLEMENTE R. LUMAYNO, ARTHUR
M. CAPIN, ALLAN BENTUZAL,
AND JEFFREY LLENES,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 209344, June 27,

JAIME BRIOSO ALIAS TALAP-
TALAP, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 206294, June 29,

CERILO "ILOY" ILOGON, Accused-
Appellant.

A.C. No. 9871, June 29, 2016

- IN RE: A.M. NO. 04-7-373-RTC
[REPORT ON THE JUDICIAL
AUDIT CONDUCTED IN THE
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT,
BRANCH 60, BARILI, CEBU] AND
A.M. NO. 04-7-374-RTC
[VIOLATION OF JUDGE
ILDEFONSO SUERTE, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 60,
BARILI, CEBU OF
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 36-
2004 DATED MARCH 3, 2004],
PROSECUTOR MARY ANN T.
CASTRO-ROA, Respondent.

G.R. No. 210673, June 29,

PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff and
Appellee, v. GILBERT CABALLERO
Y GARSOLA, Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 206880, June 29,

ENRIQUE MIRANDA, JR. Y PAÑA
@ "ERIKA" AND ALVIN ALGA Y
MIRANDA @ "ALVIN," Accused-
Appellants.
Ads by
G.R. No. 205871, June 27,
2016 - RUEL TUANO Y Send feedback Why this ad?
HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v.
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 207231, June 29,

PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. ROGER
GALAGATI Y GARDOCE,
Appellant.

G.R. Nos. 183200-01, June 29,

2016 - PHILIPPINE NATIONAL OIL
COMPANY-ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
AND/OR PAUL AQUINO AND
ESTER R. GUERZON, Petitioners,
v. AMELYN A. BUENVIAJE,
Respondent.; G.R. Nos. 183253 &
183257 - AMELYN A. BUENVIAJE,
Petitioner, v. PHILIPPINE
NATIONAL OIL COMPANY-ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
PAUL A. AQUINO AND ESTER R.
GUERZON, Respondents.

G.R. No. 219468, June 08,

2016 - JOSE BURGOS, JR.,
Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ELADIO
SJ. NAVAL AND ARLINA B. NAVAL,
AND AMALIA B. NAVAL,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 194664, June 15,

2016 - FLORITA LIAM, Petitioner,
v. UNITED COCONUT PLANTERS
BANK, Respondent.

G.R. No. 194235, June 08,

JAY GREGORIO Y AMAR @ "JAY,"
ROLANDO ESTRELLA Y
RAYMUNDO @ "BONG," DANILO
BERGONIA Y ALELENG @
"DANNY," EFREN GASCON Y
DELOS SANTOS @ "EFREN,"
RICARDO SALAZAR Y GO @
"ERIC," AND JOHN DOE, Accused-
Appellants.

G.R. No. 187696, June 15,

2016 - FILOMENA CABLING,
Petitioner, v. RODRIGO
DANGCALAN, Respondent.

G.R. No. 211065, June 15,

Ads by
2016 - HEIRS OF JOSE
EXTREMADURA, REPRESENTED Send feedback Why this ad?
BY ELENA H. EXTREMADURA,
Petitioners, v. MANUEL
EXTREMADURA AND MARLON
EXTREMADURA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 190876, June 15,

2016 - YELLOW BUS LINE
EMPLOYEES UNION (YBLEU),
Petitioner, v. YELLOW BUS LINE,
INC. (YBLI), Respondent.

A.C. No. 8677, June 15, 2016

- MARITA CABAS, Petitioner, v.
ATTY. RIA NINA L. SUSUSCO AND
CHIEF CITY PROSECUTOR EMELIE
FE DELOS SANTOS, Respondents.

G.R. No. 196557, June 15,

2016 - GREGORIO "TONGEE"
BALAIS, JR., Petitioner, v. SE'LON
BY AIMEE, AMELITA REVILLA AND
ALMA BELARMINO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 195224, June 15,

2016 - VIRGINIA JABALDE Y
JAMANDRON, Petitioner, v.
Respondent.

G.R. No. 199422, June 21,

2016 - COMMISSIONER OF
INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v.
KEPCO ILIJAN CORPORATION,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 189851, June 22,

2016 - INTEC CEBU INC.,
AKIHIKO KAMBAYASHI AND
WATARU SATO, Petitioners, v.
HON. COURT OF APPEALS,
ROWENA REYES, ROWENA
ODIONG, HYDEE AYUDA,
TERESITA BERIDO, CRISTINA
LABAPIZ, GEMMA JUMAO-AS,
SIGMARINGA BAROLO, LIGAYA B.
ANADON, DONALINE DELA
TORRE, JOY P. LOMOD,
JACQUELINE A. FLORES, SUSAN
T. ALIÑO, ANALYN P. ABALLE,
CAROLINE A. LABATOS, LENITH F.
ROMANO, LEONILA B. FLORES,
CECILIA G. PAPELLERO, AGNES
C. CASIO, VIOLETA O.
MATCHETE, CANDIDA I.
CRUJIDO, CLAUDIA B.
CUTAMORA, ROSALIE R.
Ads by
POLICIOS, GENELYN C. MUÑEZ,
ALOME MIGUE, ELSIE ALCOS, Send feedback Why this ad?
LYDIALYN B. GODINEZ AND
MYRNA S. LOGAOS, Respondents.

G.R. No. 214503, June 22,

RICO ENRIQUEZ Y CRUZ,
Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 181369, June 22,

2016 - TALA REALTY SERVICES
CORP., INC., PEDRO B. AGUIRRE,
REMEDIOS A. DUPASQUIER,
DOLLY LIM, RUBENCITO M. DEL
MUNDO AND ELIZABETH H.
PALMA, Petitioners, v. BANCO
FILIPINO SAVINGS & MORTGAGE
BANK, Respondent.

G.R. No. 170966, June 22,

2016 - REPUBLIC OF THE
THE DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE, Petitioner, v.
ALBERTO LOOYUKO, DOING
BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME
AND STYLE OF NOAH'S ARK
SUGAR HOLDINGS AND WILSON
T. GO, Respondents.

A.C. No. 9226 (Formerly CBD

06-1749), June 14, 2016 - MA.
CECILIA CLARISSA C,
ADVINCULA, Complainant, v.
ATTY. LEONARDO C. ADVINCULA,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 214473, June 22,

EMETERIO MEDINA Y DAMO,
Accused-Appellant.

G.R. No. 208393, June 15,

2016 - CITY OF TAGUIG,
Petitioner, v. CITY OF MAKATI,
Respondent.

A.C. No. 9574, June 21, 2016

- MYRNA M. DEVEZA,
Complainant, v. ATTY.
ALEXANDER M. DEL PRADO,
Respondent.

A.M. No. P-16-3459 [Formerly

Ads by
OCA IPI No. 13-4119-P], June 21,
2016 - ATTY. JOSELITA C. Send feedback Why this ad?
MALIBAGO-SANTOS, CLERK OF
COURT VI, OFFICE OF THE CLERK
OF COURT, REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT, ANTIPOLO CITY, RIZAL,
Complainant, v. JUANITO B.
FRANCISCO, JR., SHERIFF IV,
OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF COURT
[OCC], REGIONAL TRIAL COURT,
ANTIPOLO CITY, RIZAL,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 200072, June 20,

2016 - PHILIP YU, Petitioner, v.
VIVECA LIM YU, Respondent.

G.R. No. 183543, June 20,

2016 - NATIONAL HOUSING
AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. MANILA
SEEDLING BANK FOUNDATION,
INC., Respondent.

A.M. No. MTJ-16-1877

(Formerly OCA IPI No. 13-2635-
MTJ), June 13, 2016 - MOAMAR
PANGANDAG, Complainant, v.
PRESIDING JUDGE OTTOWA B.
ABINAL, 8TH MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT
TRIAL COURT IN MULONDO,
MAGUING, LUMBA-BAYABAO,
AND TARAKA, LANAO DEL SUR,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 154069, June 06,

2016 - INTERPORT RESOURCES
CORPORATION, Petitioner, v.
SECURITIES SPECIALIST, INC.,
AND R.C. LEE SECURITIES INC.,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 193455, June 13,

2016 - NATIONAL POWER
HEIRS OF GREGORIO RAMORAN,
NAMELY: DELFIN R. PINEDA,
ESPERANZA PINEDA MAGPALI,
DIGNA PINEDA ARZADON,
CARIDAD R. PINEDA, IMELDA
ZIAPNO, TERESITA PINEDA
DELFIN, ESTER R. PINEDA, FE Y.
UZON, PACENCIA ERFE VERSOZA,
IMPRESSION V. CLEMENTE, ALL
REPRESENTED BY DELFIN R.
PINEDA, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT,
Respondents.; SPOUSES
ARNULFO R. VERSOZA AND
PRISCILLA M. VERSOZA;
Ads by
SPOUSES DOMINGO AND
DOMINGA GOMEZ; AND ERLINDA Send feedback Why this ad?
GOMEZ-OCAY, IN HER BEHALF
AND IN BEHALF OF CARLITO,
MEDELINA, ANGELISTA, SILVERA,
LOLITA, & ROMBERTO, ALL
SURNAMED GOMEZ, Intervenor-
Respondents.

G.R. No. 183794, June 13,

2016 - SPOUSES JAIME AND
MATILDE POON, Petitioners, v.
PRIME SAVINGS BANK
REPRESENTED BY THE
PHILIPPINE DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION AS STATUTORY
LIQUIDATOR, Respondent.

G.R. No. 190644, June 13,

2016 - NDC TAGUM
FOUNDATION, INC., ANITA B.
SOMOSO, AND LIDA U. NATAVIO,
Petitioners, v. EVELYN B.
SUMAKOTE, Respondent.

G.R. No. 208205, June 01,

2016 - ATTY. ROMEO G. ROXAS,
Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC REAL
ESTATE CORPORATION,
Respondent.; G.R. No. 208212 -
REPUBLIC REAL ESTATE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 188829, June 13,

PHILIPPINES, HON. RAUL S.
GONZALEZ, IN HIS CAPACITY AS
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, HON. ALIPIO F.
FERNANDEZ, JR., IN HIS
CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF
THE BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION,
HON. ARTHEL B. CAROÑONGAN,
HON. TEODORO B. DELARMENTE,
HON. JOSE D. CABOCHAN, AND
HON. FRANKLIN Z. LITTAUA, IN
THEIR CAPACITY AS MEMBERS
OF THE BOARD OF
COMMISSIONERS OF THE
BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION,
Petitioners, v. DAVONN MAURICE
C. HARP, Respondent.

G.R. No. 197122, June 15,

2016 - INGRID SALA
SANTAMARIA AND ASTRID SALA

Ads by
BOZA, Petitioners, v. THOMAS
CLEARY, Respondent.; G.R. No. Send feedback Why this ad?
197161 - KATHRYN GO-PEREZ,
Petitioner, v. THOMAS CLEARY,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 213054, June 15,

2016 - TERESITA TAN, Petitioner,
v. JOVENCIO F. CINCO, SIMON
LORI HOLDINGS, INC.,
PENTACAPITAL INVESTMENT
CORPORATION, FORTUNATO G.
PE, RAYMUNDO G. PE, JOSE
REVILLA REYES, JR., AND DEPUTY
SHERIFF ROMMEL IGNACIO,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 214901, June 15,

2016 - LAND BANK OF THE
APOLONIO KHO, REPRESENTED
BY HIS HEIRS, NAMELY: PERLA
LUZ, KRYPTON, KOSELL, KYRIN,
AND KELVIN, ALL SURNAMED
KHO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 211015, June 20,

2016 - CAGAYAN ELECTRIC
POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, INC.
(CEPALCO) AND CEPALCO
ENERGY SERVICES
CORPORATION (CESCO),
FORMERLY CEPALCO ENERGY
SERVICES & TRADING
CORPORATION (CESTCO),
Petitioners, v. CEPALCO
EMPLOYEE'S LABOR UNION-
ASSOCIATED LABOR UNIONS-
TRADE UNION CONGRESS OF
THE PHILIPPINES (TUCP),
Respondent.; G.R. No. 213835 -
CAGAYAN ELECTRIC POWER &
LIGHT COMPANY, INC. (CEPALCO)
AND CEPALCO ENERGY SERVICES
CORPORATION (CESCO),
FORMERLY CEPALCO ENERGY
SERVICES & TRADING
CORPORATION (CESTCO),
Petitioners, v. CEPALCO
EMPLOYEE'S LABOR UNION-
ASSOCIATED LABOR UNIONS-
TRADE UNION CONGRESS OF
THE PHILIPPINES (TUCP),
Respondent.

G.R. No. 215348, June 20,

2016 - ELDEFONSO G. DEL
ROSARIO AND JOSEFINO R.

Ads by
ORTIZ, Petitioners, v. CRISTINA
OCAMPO-FERRER, Respondent. Send feedback Why this ad?

G.R. No. 203527, June 27,

2016 - SPS. AURELIO HITEROZA
AND CYNTHIA HITEROZA,
Petitioners, v. CHARITO S.
CRUZADA, PRESIDENT AND
CHAIRMAN, CHRIST'S
ACHIEVERS MONTESSORI, INC.,
AND CHRIST'S ACHIEVERS
MONTESSORI, INC.,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 212960, June 08,

2016 - SAMAHANG
MANGGAGAWA SA GENERAL
OFFSET PRESS, INC., Petitioner,
v. GENERAL OFFSET PRESS, INC.,
JUANITA TIU AND JOJI TIU,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 210565, June 28,

2016 - EMMANUEL D.
QUINTANAR, BENJAMIN O.
DURANO, CECILIO C. DELAVIN,
RICARDO G GABORNI, ROMEL G
GERARMAN, JOEL JOHN P.
AGUILAR, RAMIRO T. GAVIOLA,
RESTITUTO D. AGSALUD, MARTIN
E. CELIS, PATRICIO L. ARIOS,
MICHAEL S. BELLO, LORENZO C.
QUINLOG, JUNNE G. BLAYA,
SANTIAGO B. TOLENTINO, JR.,
NESTOR A. MAGNAYE, ARNOLD S.
POLVORIDO, ALLAN A. AGAPITO,
ARIEL E. BAUMBAD, JOSE T.
LUTIVA, EDGARDO G. TAPALLA,
ROLDAN C. CADAYONA,
REYNALDO V. ALBURO, RUDY C.
ULTRA, MARCELO R. CABILI,
ARNOLD B. ASIATEN, REYMUNDO
R. MACABALLUG, JOEL R.
DELEÑA, DANILO T. OQUIÑO,
GREG B. CAPARAS AND ROMEO T.
ESCARTIN, Petitioners, v. COCA-
COLA BOTTLERS, PHILIPPINES,
INC., Respondent.

G.R. No. 191087, June 29,

2016 - DELIA L. BELITA,
SALVADOR ILARDE, JR.,
GENEVIEVE BELITA, MA. CHERYL
DAVA, BRAULIO LEDESMA, JR.,
FLORENCE B. OLSEN, KATHY
GERMENTIL, ROSITA ESTUART,
ARDELIZA LIM, ELSA RAFANAN,
ERLINDA V. GAERLAN, PERLA

Ads by
FERNANDEZ, DELBEN "NOY"
BELITA AND JOSEPH AVACILLA, Send feedback Why this ad?
Petitioners, v. ANTONIO S. SY,
ROBERTO CARONAN, WILFREDO
CIRIACO, NORMA S. WONG,
SONIA C. BENERO, MARIA L.
PINEDA AND CRISTINA V.
CARAMOL, Respondents.

G.R. No. 204264, June 29,

2016 - JENNEFER FIGUERA, AS
SUBSTITUTED BY ENHANCE VISA
SERVICES, INC., REPRESENTED
BY MA. EDEN R. DUMONT,
Petitioner, v. MARIA REMEDIOS
ANG, Respondent.

G.R. No. 205544, June 29,

2016 - MUNICIPALITY OF
CORDOVA, PROVINCE OF CEBU;
THE SANGGUNIANG BAYAN OF
CORDOVA; AND THE MAYOR OF
THE MUNICIPALITY OF CORDOVA,
Petitioners, v. PATHFINDER
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
AND TOPANGA DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, Respondents.

G.R. No. 206484, June 29,

2016 - DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND
COMMUNICATIONS (DOTC),
Petitioner, v. SPOUSES VICENTE
ABECINA AND MARIA CLEOFE
ABECINA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 210761, June 28,

2016 - KILUSANG MAYO UNO,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CHAIRPERSON, ELMER LABOG;
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF
LABOR UNIONS-KILUSANG MAYO
UNO, REPRESENTED BY ITS
VICE-PRESIDENTS, REDEN
ALCANTARA AND ARNOLD DELA
CRUZ, CENTER FOR TRADE
UNION AND HUMAN RIGHTS
(CTUHR), REPRESENTED BY ITS
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DAISY
ARAGO, VIRGINIA FLORES AND
VIOLETA ESPIRITU, Petitioners, v.
HON. BENIGNO SIMEON C.
AQUINO III, AND PHILIPPINE
HEALTH INSURANCE
CORPORATION (PHIC),
Respondents; MIGRANTE
INTERNATIONAL, REPRESENTED
BY ITS CHAIRPERSON GARRY

Ads by
MARTINEZ, CONNIE BRAGAS-
REGALADO, PARALUMAN Send feedback Why this ad?
CATUIRA, UNITED FILIPINOS IN
HONGKONG (UNIFIL-HK), AND
SOLEDAD PILLAS, Petitioners-in-
Intervention.

G.R. No. 188020, June 27,

2016 - REN TRANSPORT CORP.
AND/OR REYNALDO PAZCOGUIN
III, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL
LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION
(2ND DIVISION), SAMAHANG
MANGGAGAWA SA REN
TRANSPORT-ASSOCIATION OF
DEMOCRATIC LABOR
ASSOCIATIONS (SMART-ADLO)
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
NESTOR FULMINAR,
Respondents.; G.R. No. 188252 -
SAMAHANG MANGGAGAWA SA
REN TRANSPORT-ASSOCIATION
OF DEMOCRATIC LABOR
ASSOCIATIONS (SMART-ADLO)
REPRESENTED BY NESTOR
FULMINAR, Petitioner, v. REN
TRANSPORT CORP. AND/OR
REYNALDO PAZCOGUIN III,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 208759, June 22,

DIONE BARBERAN AND DIONE
DELOS SANTOS, Accused-
Appellants.

G.R. No. 209714, June 21,

2016 - RAPHAEL C. FONTANILLA,
Petitioner, v. THE COMMISSIONER
PROPER, COMMISSION ON
AUDIT, Respondent.

A.C. No. 10465, June 08, 2016

- SPOUSES LAMBERTO V.
EUSTAQUIO AND GLORIA J.
EUSTAQUIO, Complainants, v.
ATTY. EDGAR R. NAVALES,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 203458, June 06,

PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v.
QUIRINO BALMES Y CLEOFE,
Appellant.

G.R. No. 203924, June 29,

Ads by
2016 - ROGER CABUHAT AND
CONCHITA CABUHAT, Petitioners, Send feedback Why this ad?
v. DEVELOPMENT BANK OF THE
MANAGER PERLA L. FAVILA,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 211141, June 29,

2016 - HILARIO DASCO, REYMIR
PARAFINA, RICHARD PARAFINA,
EDILBERTO ANIA, MICHAEL
ADANO, JAIME BOLO, RUBEN E.
GULA, ANTONIO CUADERNO AND
JOVITO CATANGUI, Petitioners, v.
PHILTRANCO SERVICE
ENTERPRISES INC/CENTURION
SOLANO, MANAGER,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 211526, June 29,

2016 - PMI-FACULTY AND
EMPLOYEES UNION, Petitioner, v.
PMI COLLEGES BOHOL,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 184666, June 27,

PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. MEGA
PACIFIC ESOLUTIONS, INC.,
WILLY U. YU, BONNIE S. YU,
ENRIQUE T. TANSIPEK, ROSITA Y.
TANSIPEK, PEDRO O. TAN,
JOHNSON W. FONG, BERNARD I.
FONG, AND *LAURIANO A.
BARRIOS, Respondents.

G.R. No. 208383, June 08,

2016 - FIRST MEGA HOLDINGS
CORP., Petitioner, v. GUIGUINTO
WATER DISTRICT, Respondent.

G.R. No. 186050, June 21,

2016 - ARTHUR BALAO,
WINSTON BALAO, NONETTE
BALAO, JONILYN BALAO-
STRUGAR, AND BEVERLY
LONGID, Petitioners, v. EDUARDO
ERMITA, GILBERTO TEODORO,
RONALDO PUNO, NORBERTO
GONZALES, GEN. ALEXANDER
YANO, GEN. JESUS VERZOSA,
BRIG. GEN. REYNALDO MAPAGU,
LT. P/DIR. EDGARDO DOROMAL,
MAJ. GEN. ISAGANI CACHUELA,
COMMANDING OFFICER OF THE
AFP-ISU BASED IN BAGUIO CITY,
PSS EUGENE MARTIN, AND
SEVERAL JOHN DOES,

Ads by
Respondents.; G.R. NO. 186059 -
EDUARDO SECRETARY TEODORO, Send feedback Why this ad?
RONALDO SECRETARY
GONZALES, SECRETARY ERMITA,
GILBERTO SECRETARY PUNO,
NORBERTO GEN. ALEXANDER
YANO, P/DGEN. JESUS VERZOSA,
BRIG. GEN. REYNALDO MAPAGU,
MAJ. GEN. ISAGANI CACHUELA,
AND POL. SR. SUPT. EUGENE
MARTIN, Petitioners, v. ARTHUR
BALAO, WINSTON JARDELEZA,
AND BALAO, NONETTE BALAO,
CAGUIOA, JJ. JONILYN BALAO-
STRUGAR, AND BEVERLY
LONGID, Respondents.**

G.R. No. 203538, June 27,

2016 - ARTEX DEVELOPMENT
CO., INC., Petitioner, v. OFFICE
OF THE OMBUDSMAN, ATTY.
MARISSA E. TIMONES, ERLINDA
O. MARTEJA, ELIMAR N. JOSE,
AND ATTY. LUIS Y. DEL MUNDO,
JR., Respondents.

G.R. No. 202830, June 20,

2016 - SPOUSES ADRIANO
SALISE AND NATIVIDAD
PAGUDAR, SPOUSES TEODORO
VIRTUDAZO AND NECITAS
SALISE, JEROME G. DIOLANTO,
SPOUSES EULALIO D. DAMASING
AND POTENCIANA LABIA,
SPOUSES FRANCISCO AND
SIMPLICIA BABAYA-ON, SPOUSES
RUFINO BUTIHIN AND CECILIA
CAGNO, SPOUSES EFITACIO G.
PAMISA AND VIRGELIA
VIRTUDAZO, DELFIN B. SARINAS,
SPOUSES FELIPE C. VIRTUDAZO,
JR. AND GRACE TUTO, SPOUSES
ANGEL BARBOSA AND
FLORENCIA SALISE, SPOUSES
FRANKLIN AND LEONORA
PAMISA, SPOUSES MARCELO
MANIQUE AND CECILIA CARBON,
LARRY PAMISA, SPOUSES
ENRIQUE CARBON AND ERLINDA
SOMO, SPOUSES WILFREDO A.
JUANILO AND MINDA VILLARMIA,
SPOUSES FELIX REQUILME AND
CERINA SALVO, SPOUSES
CARLITO FABE AND EMELITA
MANGGANA, LUIBEN MAGTO,
SPOUSES SERAFIN AND LILIA
SURIGAO, SPOUSES HILARIO
BACABIS AND RETIFICACION

Ads by
DABLO, SPOUSES REYNALDO S.
SALUCOT AND ANECITA Send feedback Why this ad?
DESCALLAR, SPOUSES HAGENIO
PAUG AND EVELITA VIRTUDAZO,
SPOUSES MAXIMO BORREZ AND
VILMA SALISE, SPOUSES
FELIMON V. SALVO, JR., EVA
MACATOL AND RITA V. SALVO,
Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF
AGRARIAN REFORM
ADJUDICATION BOARD REGION X
ADJUDICATOR ABETO SALCEDO,
JR. AND RICARDO GACULA,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 202621, June 22,

2016 - ZAIDA R. INOCENTE,
Petitioner, v. ST. VINCENT
FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN
AND AGING, INC./VERONICA
MENGUITO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 209384, June 27,

2016 - URBANO F. ESTRELLA,
Petitioner, v. PRISCILLA P.
FRANCISCO, Respondent.

G.R. Nos. 185857-58, June 29,

2016 - TRIFONIA D. GABUTAN,
DECEASED, HEREIN
REPRESENTED BY HER HEIRS,
NAMELY: ERLINDA LLAMES, ELISA
ASOK, PRIMITIVO GABUTAN,
VALENTINA YANE; BUNA D.
ACTUB, FELISIA TROCIO,
CRISANTA D. UBAUB, AND TIRSO
DALONDONAN, DECEASED,
HEREIN REPRESENTED BY HIS
HEIRS, NAMELY: MADELYN D.
REPOSAR AND JERRY
DALONDONAN, MARY JANE
GILIG, ALLAN UBAUB, AND
SPOUSES NICOLAS & EVELYN
DAILO, Petitioners, v. DANTE D.
NACALABAN, HELEN N.
MAANDIG, SUSAN N. SIAO, AND
CAGAYAN CAPITOL COLLEGE,
Respondents.; G.R. NOS.
194314-15 - DANTE D.
NACALABAN, HELEN N.
MAANDIG, AND SUSAN N. SIAO,
AS HEIRS OF BALDOMERA D.
VDA. DE NACALABAN, Petitioners,
v. TRIFONIA D. GABUTAN, BUNA
D. ACTUB, FELISIA D. TROCIO,
CRISANTA D. UBAUB, AND TIRSO
DALONDONAN, DECEASED,
HEREIN REPRESENTED BY HIS

Ads by
HEIRS, NAMELY: MADELYN D.
REPOSAR AND JERRY Send feedback Why this ad?
DALONDONAN, MARY JANE
GILIG, ALLAN UBAUB, AND
SPOUSES NICOLAS & EVELYN
DAILO, CAGAYAN CAPITOL
COLLEGE, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRESIDENT, ATTY. CASIMIRO B.
SUAREZ, JR., PRIVATE
Respondent; HON. LEONCIA R.
DIMAGIBA (ASSOCIATE
JUSTICE), HON. PAUL L.
HERNANDO (ASSOCIATE
JUSTICE), HON. NINA G.
ANTONIO-VALENZUELA
(ASSOCIATE JUSTICE), HON.
EDGARDO T. LLOREN (ASSOCIATE
JUSTICE), HON. MICHAEL P.
ELBINIAS (ASSOCIATE JUSTICE),
AND HON. JANE AURORA C.
LANTION (ASSOCIATE JUSTICE,
ACTING CHAIRMAN), COURT OF
APPEALS, CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY
(FORMER SPECIAL TWENTY-
SECOND DIVISION), PUBLIC
Respondents.

G.R. No. 209794, June 27,

2016 - LAND BANK OF THE
SPOUSES JOSE AMAGAN AND
AURORA AMAGAN, DOING
BUSINESS UNDER THE TRADE
NAME AND STYLE "A & J
SEAFOODS AND MARINE
PRODUCTS," AND JOHN DOE,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 163157, June 27,

2016 - SPOUSES BERNABE
MERCADER, JR. AND LORNA
JURADO MERCADER, OLIVER
MERCADER, GERALDINE
MERCADER AND ESRAMAY
MERCADER, Petitioners, v.
SPOUSES JESUS BARDILAS AND
LETECIA GABUYA BARDILAS,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 215950, June 20,

2016 - TRIDHARMA MARKETING
COURT OF TAX APPEALS,
SECOND DIVISION, AND THE
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL
REVENUE, Respondents.

G.R. No. 216452, June 20,

Ads by
2016 - TING TRUCKING/MARY
VIOLAINE A. TING, Petitioner, v. Send feedback Why this ad?
JOHN C. MAKILAN, Respondent.

G.R. No. 214399, June 28,

2016 - ARMANDO N. PUNCIA,
Petitioner, v. TOYOTA
SHAW/PASIG, INC., Respondent.

G.R. No. 166890, June 28,

APOLONIO BAUTISTA, JR.,
Respondent.

G.R. No. 218240, June 28,

2016 - ENGR. PABLITO S.
PALUCA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS
THE GENERAL MANAGER OF THE
DIPOLOG CITY WATER DISTRICT,
Petitioner, v. COMMISSION ON
AUDIT, Respondent.

G.R. No. 212186, June 29,

2016 - ARIEL LOPEZ, Petitioner, v.
Respondent.

G.R. No. 194065, June 20,

2016 - PHILIPPINE BANK OF
COMMUNICATIONS, Petitioner, v.
REVENUE, Respondent.

G.R. No. 213582, June 28,

2016 - NYMPHA S. ODIAMAR,1
Petitioner, v. LINDA ODIAMAR
VALENCIA, Respondent.

G.R. No. 211269, June 15,

2016 - RUBEN E. TIU, Petitioner,
v. HON. NATIVIDAD G. DIZON,
ACTING CHAIRPERSON OF THE
BOARD OF PARDONS AND
PAROLE, HON. FRANKLIN JESUS
BUCAYU, DIRECTOR OF THE
BUREAU OF CORRECTIONS, HON.
SECRETARY LEILA M. DE LIMA OF
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
HON. PAQUITO N. OCHOA JR.,
THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY,
Respondents.

G.R. No. 190506, June 13,

2016 - CORAL BAY NICKEL
Ads by
REVENUE, Respondent.

G.R. No. 206528, June 28,
2016 - PHILIPPINE ASSET
GROWTH TWO, INC.
(SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST OF
PLANTERS DEVELOPMENT BANK)
AND PLANTERS DEVELOPMENT
BANK, Petitioners, v. FASTECH
SYNERGY PHILIPPINES, INC.
(FORMERLY FIRST ASIA SYSTEM
TECHNOLOGY, INC.), FASTECH
MICROASSEMBLY & TEST, INC.,
FASTECH ELECTRONIQUE, INC.,
AND FASTECH PROPERTIES, INC.,
Respondents.

Ads by
Copyright © 1995 - 2022 REDiaz

Malixi vs. Mexicali Philippine

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Malixi vs. Mexicali Philippine

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

2/7/22, 3:39 PM G.R. No. 205061, June 08, 2016 - EMERTIA G. MALIXI, Petitioner, v.

Petitioner, v. MEXICALI PHILIPPINES AND/OR FRANCESCA MABANTA,…

Live Virtual Event

Home Law Firm Law Library Laws Jurisprudence

June 2016 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions

Philippine Supreme Court

ChanRobles On-Line Bar

G.R. No. 205061, June 08, 2016

EMERTIA G. MALIXI, Petitioner, v. MEXICALI PHILIPPINES AND/OR

Resolution3 of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) reinstating

Resolution4 of the CA denying petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration.5

ChanRobles CPA Review

Respondents, however, denied responsibility over petitioner's alleged dismissal. They

Proceedings before the Labor Arbiter

WHEREFORE, premises considered, respondents are hereby declared

1. Full backwages from date of dismissal to date of actual

2. Moral damages in the sum of P100,000.00.

3. Exemplary damages in the sum of P50,000.00.

Proceedings before the National Labor Relations Commission

Respondents filed a Motion for Reconsideration and Motion for Issuance of

TRO/Injunction14 explaining that the Appeal Memorandum filed by them contained a

WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Commission GRANTS the Motion,

This Commission also PARTLY GRANTS the appeal of respondents-

Proceedings before the Court of Appeals

Hence, this Petition.

WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN SUSTAINING THE

WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS ERRED IN SUSTAINING THE

Send feedback Why this ad? III

WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS COMMITTED A REVERSIBLE ERROR IN

WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS COMMITTED A REVERSIBLE ERROR IN

WHETHER THE COURT OF APPEALS COMMITTED A REVERSIBLE ERROR IN

PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR CERTIORARI.21 ChanRoblesVirtualawlibrary

The Petition has no merit.

The appeal before the NLRC was filed on time.

PUTE CHING, Petitioners, v.

AND LOLITA MALONZO,

Petitioner, v. LILING LANTO

for illegal dismissal.

G.R. No. 205061, June 08,

2016 - EMERTIA G. MALIXI,

We disagree. "Resignation is the voluntary act of an employee who is in a situation

2016 - BENJAMIN H. CABAÑEZ,

or related."32 Clear and convincing evidence is needed to warrant the application of

SIAO, SHELETT SIAO AND

thereafter advised her to execute a resignation letter, to which she complied.

wield petitioner's termination from employment. Anent the element of control,

2016 - LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT

PALMA, ANGELITO V. GUINTO,

LIAO, ROLANDO C. CEBANICO,

VELIENTE S. FANTASTICO, MA.

RUEL F. MAGBALANA, MARLYN V.

VILLANUEVA, JUDITH C. BANEZ,

GERMAN N. DE LUNA, FREDERICK

B. DEL CORRO, CLODUALDO B.

NAVARRO, AND PACIANO J.

1Rollo, pp. 10-29.

MICHAEL KURT JOHN BULAWAN Y

2016 - ANDRES L. DIZON,

Petitioner, v. NAESS SHIPPING 4 Id. at 226-227.

PHILIPPINES, INC. AND DOLE UK

G.R. No. 196962, June 08,

2016 - PEOPLE OF THE

JOAN SONJACO Y STA. ANA,

feedback Why this ad?