ICoSeMT 2019 Full Paper Evaluation Form

Paper ID :

Title :

Evaluator’s Name :

Organisation/Company/Institution :

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Technical Criteria
 Scientific merit: notably scientific rigour, accuracy and correctness. (YES/NO)
 Clarity of expression; communication of ideas; readability and discussion of concepts.
(YES/NO)
 Sufficient discussion of the context of the work, and suitable referencing. (YES/NO)

Quality Criteria
 Originality: Is the work relevant and novel? (YES/NO)
 Motivation: Does the problem considered have a sound motivation? All papers should clearly
demonstrate the scientific interest of the results. (YES/NO)
 Repetition: Have significant parts of the manuscript already been published? (YES/NO)
 Length: Is the content of the work of sufficient scientific interest to justify its length?
(YES/NO)

Presentation Criteria
 Title: Is it adequate and appropriate for the content of the article? (YES/NO)
 Abstract: Does it contain the essential information of the article? Is it complete? Is it suitable
for inclusion by itself in an abstracting service? (YES/NO)
 Diagrams, figures, tables and captions: Are they essential and clear? (YES/NO)
 Text and mathematics: Are they brief but still clear? If you recommend shortening, please
suggest what should be omitted. (YES/NO)

Comment:

 Conclusion: Does the paper contain a carefully written conclusion, summarizing what has
been learned and why it is interesting and useful? (YES/NO)
 Comment:

Please provide your overall evaluation. Tick and provide a detailed review (in the
justification sections), including justifications for your scores. Both of the score and the
review text are required.

Tick Evaluation Score

Strongly accepted for publication 3
Accepted for publication 2
Weakly accepted for publication 1
Borderline paper for publication 0
Weakly rejected for publication -1
Rejected for publication -2
Strongly rejected for publication -3

Your justification of the above evaluations. Please include all corrections for authors to
improve the manuscript (if any):

Publication Type (Please select and tick suitability of publication in Journal or Proceeding) :

Journal

Proceeding

Confidential remarks for the program committee. If you wish to add any remarks intended
only for PC members please write them below. These remarks will only be seen by the PC
members having access to reviews for this submission. They will not be sent to the authors.
(This field is optional):

Thank you for evaluating this article.

Please email this evaluation form to editor_icosemt@usm.my within 7 days.